38 HIROSHIMAS HIDDEN: How’d The Army Do That?

Why not a matchBox sized nuke? Easy to use, not detectable.

Why not a matchbox sized nuke? Easy to use, not detectable.

(San Francisco) – Dr. Chris Busby, a world famous UK based physicist, was at the UN last week with the results of his health survey comparing the health of the city of Fallujah, Iraq with 38 Hiroshimas.

The results were truly astonishing, even to the jaded eyes of UN representatives, old retired war fighters and politically connected bureaucrats. No armed force had accomplished this level of death and disease in a civilian population before.

What Weapons Do Many Hiroshimas?

There it was in black and white, on paper, from an internationally respected physicist – the utterly unbelievable, but certified results: Fallujah’s leukemia rate was 38 times higher than Hiroshima after the US Atomic Bombing in 1945. The questions were fast and furious.

Questions include:

  1. How did the US do that? and,
  2. What weapons did the US deploy on the civilian population to cause so much cancer? and,
  3. Did the US nuke weapons labs develop a Cancer Bomb?

Many diplomatic representatives were probably wondering how their government could get some of those weapons, though they had no idea what the weapons were. Neither do I.

This is a whole ‘nother level of warfare, to paraphrase Maj Doug Rokke, USArmy, Ret., former Director of the Pentagon’s Depleted Uranium Project. The US Army and Marines visited upon the isolated, small Iraqi city of Fallujah, somehow, 38 times the killing and cancer causing power of the Atomic Bomb that devastated Hiroshima 65 years ago. That is a big improvement in war fighting lethality. What on Earth did you guys use?

The Livermore Nuclear Weapons Lab in California and the Lethality Center at Picatinney Aresenal in New Jersey were most certainly involved, among others, in this monumental breakthrough in war fighting capability. This is a really big deal! War fighting is all about delivering death and disease to the enemy population and enemy war fighters.

Was Fallujah a “Field Test” for New Hiroshima Weapons?

A reliable “Cancer Bomb” that nations can deploy while the whole world is watching is a long sought after Holy Grail of the US Weapons Program. A “Cancer Bomb” that politicians and Generals can deploy with arguable deniability, as if it was just another conventional weapon, would be absolutely Priceless to War Makers, War Planners and War Targeters at the Pentagon. They have long dreamed of just such a weapon.

The Cancer Bomb Results in Fallajuh do look like the answer to many a War Planners’ Prayer. This is a good report from Dr. Busby. I highly recommend it to all you guys at the Pentagon, gals too. This is the answer to your Prayers.

US Def Sec Robert Gates

US Def Sec Robert Gates is the Man. The Nuke Labs really work for him.

It is not so good for ordinary grunts slogging through house-to-house urban warfare. The distinction between targeted civilian and US grunt is non-existent. This stuff does not discriminate. It just kills, or sickens with death as the exit strategy.

Why, even the Roman Catholic Church and the Pope endorse whole heartily the concept of slaughtering people and leaving the legacy infrastructure and buildings standing. “In 1979, Pope John Paul II conferred on … Sam Cohen a peace medal for his invention, the neutron bomb.” (1)

What weapons did you use, guys? It would seem that the logical choices are dialed down B61-11 nuclear weapons set to less than 5 kt to cover up their use. Fourth Generation nuclear weapons for heavy neutron doses to the civilian population and other rumored neutron weapons. Doctors have told us that heavy neutron warfare would produce these disease and cancer characteristics and Male/Female sex ratio changes. What else did you use?

Here’s the results, all scientific like, of what you guys did.


Cancer, Infant Mortality and Birth Sex-Ratio in Fallujah, Iraq 2005–2009

Dr. Chris Busby

Abstract: There have been anecdotal reports of increases in birth defects and cancer in Fallujah, Iraq blamed on the use of novel weapons (possibly including depleted uranium) in heavy fighting which occurred in that town between US led forces and local elements in 2004. In Jan/Feb 2010 the authors organised a team of researchers who visited 711 houses in Fallujah, Iraq and obtained responses to a questionnaire in Arabic on cancer, birth defects and infant mortality. The total population in the resulting sample was 4,843 persons with and overall response rate was better than 60%. Relative Risks for cancer were age-standardised and compared to rates in the Middle East Cancer Registry (MECC, Garbiah Egypt) for 1999 and rates in Jordan 1996–2001. Between Jan 2005 and the survey end date there were 62 cases of cancer malignancy reported (RR = 4.22; CI: 2.8, 6.6; p < 0.00000001) including 16 cases of childhood cancer 0-14 (RR = 12.6; CI: 4.9, 32; p < 0.00000001). Highest risks were found in all-leukaemia in the age groups 0-34 (20 cases RR = 38.5; CI: 19.2, 77; p < 0.00000001), all lymphoma 0–34 (8 cases, RR = 9.24;CI: 4.12, 20.8; p < 0.00000001), female breast cancer 0–44 (12 cases RR = 9.7;CI: 3.6, 25.6; p < 0.00000001) and brain tumours all ages (4 cases, RR = 7.4;CI: 2.4, 23.1; P < 0.004). Infant mortality was based on the mean birth rate over the 4 year period 2006–2009 with 1/6th added for cases reported in January and February 2010. There were 34 deaths in the age group 0–1 in this period giving a rate of 80 deaths per 1,000 births. This may be compared with a rate of 19.8 in Egypt (RR = 4.2 p < 0.00001) 17 in Jordan in 2008 and 9.7 in Kuwait in 2008. The mean birth sex-ratio in the recent 5-year cohort was anomalous.

Normally the sex ratio in human populations is a constant with 1,050 boys born to 1,000 girls. This is disturbed if there is a genetic damage stress. The ratio of boys to 1,000 girls in the 0–4, 5–9, 10–14 and 15–19 age cohorts in the Fallujah sample were 860, 1,182, 1,108 and 1,010 respectively suggesting genetic damage to the 0–4 group (p < 0.01). Whilst the results seem to qualitatively support the existence of serious mutation-related health effects in Fallujah, owing to the structural problems associated with surveys of this kind, care should be exercised in interpreting the findings quantitatively.

Copyright 2010 – Bob Nichols. Feel free to distribute with attribution and Notes.


* Sources and Notes are an integral part of the article. Include when distributing.

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on October 15, 2010, With Reads Filed under Military. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

14 Responses to "38 HIROSHIMAS HIDDEN: How’d The Army Do That?"

  1. Henk Ruyssenaars  October 26, 2010 at 6:29 pm


    Why would those madmen who at present wield their deadly power hasten the end of humanity by mass murdering us all with radioactivity too? You, your family and friends? Are they – and that’s what it looks like and reports say – making us all victims of a planned collective suicide by their group of maniacal Dr. Strangeloves? Who actually – and you better believe it, just look at the links below – at present are slowly poisoning and killing us all with radioactivity spread all over the earth. Because the – mostly hidden – facts prove it: wherever on earth you are, you’re hit.

    But that definitely also means that all those evil planners, including their families, friends and their ‘Oppenheimers’ – the nuclear nuts – are committing suicide as well. Because there absolutely is no remedy against the negative effects of an overdose of nuclear radiation, the terminal cancers and ensuing death.


    Url.: http://www.perdana4peace.net/?p=1137

    Strange indeed…


  2. Bob Nichols  October 18, 2010 at 9:20 pm

    Wake up and smell the coffee, Luciano.

    The big nukes will not be used, there is little if any danger to that. However, this very much is a nuclear war, has been from the start, and nothing above 5 kt is used. There is too much danger of detection.

    Fact is, closed up in a bomb is probably the safest place to stash bomb grade Plutonium and Uranium. Too bad those citizens in Amarillo get to work at and live around the thermonuclear weapon refreshing stand.


  3. Bob Nichols  October 18, 2010 at 9:13 pm

    Every American War and many other countries wars offer a splendid opportunity to Field Test new weapons.

    These nuclear wars are no different than any other war.


  4. Bob Nichols  October 18, 2010 at 9:12 pm

    You hit the nail on the head, Chris.


  5. Bob Nichols  October 18, 2010 at 9:10 pm


    Randy, “coulda, woulda, shoulda” doesn’t count.

    The Pentagon does whatever they want to.

    The Pentagon is required to check the troops and the civilians of the area.

    The Pentagon decided not to. Simple as that.


  6. James  October 18, 2010 at 12:32 am

    For a visual of this article use this link. – http://thewe.cc/weplanet/news/americas/us/war_crimes_fallujah.html

  7. Freeman  October 16, 2010 at 10:47 pm

    Ain’t heard I see.
    This was a test zone for all the new space age gadget weapons, and I do mean all of them.
    Any particle can accelerate another, etc. Use a dish impregnated with the right stuff, and you now have a portable nuclear gun so to speak…
    Several differing kinds of ‘dish’ weapons were used all over the place, ‘get sick’ ones, ‘mind control’ ones, and the very newest, neutron projectors…
    Awww CRAP!
    That be classified…
    Better put the gun my pocket an lock the door…set them booby traps, an sleep light…
    Don’t like spooks before Holloween.

  8. Bob Nichols  October 16, 2010 at 7:08 pm

    This guy Busby might be able to really kick some ass at the VA. I hear that anymore when he is scheduled to testify in England at a Coroner’s Inquest Hearing that the Ministry of Defense (MOD) doesn’t even bother to show up.

    Busby absolutely humiliates whatever doc or scientist the MOD sends with their focus group tested uranium oxide, aka, DU, lies. So, the MOD docs refuse to show up when Busby is testifying.

    The guy is that good, absolutely a world class physicist.

  9. Chris Palombi  October 16, 2010 at 6:50 pm

    If the residents of Fallujah are going down at this rate by whatever means WE’VE developed, then it stands to reason that in the ensuing years, thousands of our Marines and soldiers who are Fallujah veterans will be cancer victims and they will die away while the US Govt and the VA continues to claims their deaths are not service connected. Think of the Agent Orange [AO] cancers and how long it took to make them presumptive and how many died with no VA recognition. Oh yes, another Pandora’s Box and it is best that veterans group start to force the issue now of finding out what is in the box.

  10. EJLima  October 16, 2010 at 5:59 pm

    Laws permitting this are formed from the 500 year old “Doctrine of Discovery”, issued from pope Nicholes V. Its followers are hated by Jesus as it is written in REVELATION 2.6 and 2.15 and they are judged in REVELATION 20.12 and MATTHEW 25. They shall be joining their own kind and the pope in

  11. Randy L Benson  October 16, 2010 at 2:12 am

    well, some time back we developed neutron bombs, which would kill people without damaging infrastructure.

    what if a modified neutron bomb was developed. . .and then maybe some low-grade N-bombs or grenades were used in the assault?

    then there’s the research that’s been ongoing with particle beam weapons. . .

    i think i’d also want to check the radiation levels of the troops involved in the assault. it’s possible they could have been significantly affected by radiation.

  12. Cathy Garger  October 15, 2010 at 9:53 pm

    If we remember back to Afghanistan and Lebanon, researchers found radioactive isotope ratios indicating the use of munitions more radioactive than DU. It is, therefore, only logical to assume that, in an effort to weaken, sicken, and reduce populations, a nation(s) would use as strong a weapon as it (they) believed it (they) could get away with.

    I agree with the author’s assertion that the use of small nukes in Iraq is a very strong possibility. The art of “perfecting” radioactive weaponry began in the early 1940s and continues to this very day. After all, the proving grounds, the Picatinny “lethality” center, and the nuclear weapons labs are not continually doing R & D and “testing” Uranium and other radioisotopes just for the fun of it.

    Perfecting radioactive weaponry to an art form is apparently what certain nations do better than others. Looking at the research of Busby et. al., Afghanistan and Lebanon were just for starters… with Iraq’s disease and mortality numbers the crowning “achievement” to date.

    For most of us, it is inconceivable to consider killing babies and inducing large numbers of cancers and deadly blood diseases in small children merely for the “prize” of taking control of a nation and its resources.

    All of us who posssess working consciences are not even able to conceive of such sociopathological horror.

  13. Bob Nichols  October 15, 2010 at 6:43 pm

    Nobody even knows if they exist or not. All through the 1990s the US nuke weapons labs were full of talk about the coming arrival of small usable nukes.

    No mushroom cloud, lots of killing power, tons of neutrons delivered on target and not detectable by conventional means. Then when it was time for them in 2000; everything went Dark on 4th Gen Nuke weapons.

    But, something new and unheard of before was Field Tested in Fallujah and the Results are in. It was devastating to civilians and War Fighters alike.

    It wasn’t even necessarily nuclear; it was deadly.

    What was it? Armed Forces and politicians everywhere want to know.

  14. Bob Nichols  October 15, 2010 at 6:33 pm

    What is a 4th Generation nuclear weapon?

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

From Veterans Today Network