What Murdoch sees as the rise of anti-Semitism is, in fact, the rise of anti-Israelism.

By Alan Hart — Veterans Today

In a recent speech at an ADL (Anti-Defamation League) dinner, Rupert Murdoch, arguably the most influential mainstream media chief on Planet Earth, made some extraordinary statements which must be challenged. But first it’s necessary for us all to be clear about what ADL’s role is.

Its proclaimed objective is to “fight anti-Semitism”. In reality its main purpose under the leadership of Abe Foxman is to smear, harass, silence and preferably destroy those of all faiths and none who are critical of Zionism in action – critical of Israel’s policies in general and its contempt for international law in particular; and critical of the awesome power of the Zionist lobby, in America especially.

In his speech Murdoch said his own perspective on the evil of anti-Semitism was “simple”. He put it this way (my emphasis added):

“We live in a world where there is an ongoing war against the Jews. For the first decades after Israel’s founding, this war was conventional in nature. The goal was straightforward – to use military force to overrun Israel.”

That was Murdoch’s carefully understated way of endorsing Zionism’s assertion that for the first decades of its life Israel lived in danger of annihilation, the “driving into the sea” of its Jews. As I document in detail through the three volumes of the American edition of my book Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews, Israel’s existence was never, ever, in danger from any combination of Arab force. Zionism’s assertion to the contrary was the cover that allowed Israel to get away where it mattered most (in America and Western Europe) with presenting its aggression as self-defense and itself as the victim when, actually, it was and is the oppressor.

The main event during the period in which Murdoch asserted that the Arabs were trying to “overrun” Israel was the 1967 war. Zionism’s story of it, which the mainstream media still peddles to this day, is that Israel went to war either because the Arabs attacked first or were intending to attack. Both, the either and the or, are Zionist propaganda nonsense. It was a war of Israeli aggression.

I don’t expect Murdoch to pay any attention to what the Gentile me has to say on the subject, but if he is not an agent of Zionist deception (i.e. if he is merely ignorant), he ought to consider what various Israeli leaders have said. I quote them in America Takes Sides, War With Nasser Act II and the Creation of Greater Israel, Chapter 1 of Volume Three the American edition of my book, which is sub-titled Conflict Without End?

I preface the quotes of Israeli leaders with this observation.

“If the statement that the Arabs were not intending to attack Israel and that the existence of the Jewish state was not in danger was only that of a goy, it could be dismissed by Zionists as anti-Semitic conjecture. In fact the truth the statement represents was admitted by some of the key Israeli players – after the war, of course. Before we look at what actually happened in 1967 and why, here is a short summary of some pertinent, post-war Israeli confessions.”

In an interview published in Le Monde on 28 February 1968, Israeli Chief of Staff Rabin said this: “I do not believe that Nasser wanted war. The two divisions which he sent into Sinai on 14 May would not have been enough to unleash an offensive against Israel. He knew it and we knew it.”

On 14 April 1971, a report in the Israeli newspaper Al-Hamishmar contained the following statement by Mordecai Bentov, a member of the wartime national government. “The entire story of the danger of extermination was invented in every detail and exaggerated a posteriori to justify the annexation of new Arab territory.”

On 4 April 1972, General Haim Bar-Lev, Rabin’s predecessor as chief of staff, was quoted in Ma’ariv as follows: “We were not threatened with genocide on the eve of the Six-Days war, and we had never thought of such a possibility.”

In the same Israeli newspaper on the same day, General Ezer Weizman, Chief of Operations during the war and a nephew of Chaim Weizman, was quoted as saying: “There was never any danger of annihilation. This hypothesis has never been considered in any serious meeting.”

In the spring of 1972, General Matetiyahu Peled, Chief of Logistical Command during the war and one of 12 members of Israel’s General Staff, addressed a political literary club in Tel Aviv. He said: “The thesis according to which the danger of genocide hung over us in June 1967, and according to which Israel was fighting for her very physical survival, was nothing but a bluff which was born and bred after the war.” In a radio debate Peled said: “Israel was never in real danger and there was no evidence that Egypt had any intention of attacking Israel.” He added that “Israeli intelligence knew that Egypt was not prepared for war.”

In the same program Chaim Herzog (former DMI, future Israeli Ambassador to the UN and President of his state) said: “There was no danger of annihilation. Neither Israeli headquarters nor the Pentagon – as the memoirs of President Johnson proved – believed in this danger.”

On 3 June 1972 Peled was even more explicit in an article of his own for Le Monde. He wrote: “All those stories about the huge danger we were facing because of our small territorial size, an argument expounded once the war was over, have never been considered in our calculations. While we proceeded towards the full mobilisation of our forces, no person in his right mind could believe that all this force was necessary to our ‘defense’ against the Egyptian threat. This force was to crush once and for all the Egyptians at the military level and their Soviet masters at the political level. To pretend that the Egyptian forces concentrated on our borders were capable of threatening Israel’s existence does not only insult the intelligence of any person capable of analyzing this kind of situation, but is primarily an insult to the Israeli army.”

The preference of some generals for truth-telling after the event provoked something of a debate in Israel, but it was short-lived. If some Israeli journalists had had their way, the generals would have kept their mouths shut. Weizman was one of those approached with the suggestion that he and others who wanted to speak out should “not exercise their inalienable right to free speech lest they prejudice world opinion and the Jewish diaspora against Israel.”

It is not surprising that debate in Israel was shut down before it led to some serious soul-searching about the nature of the state and whether it should continue to live by the lie as well as the sword; but it is more than remarkable, I think, that the mainstream Western media continues to prefer the convenience of the Zionist myth to the reality of what happened in 1967 and why. When reporters and commentators have need today to make reference to the Six Days War, they still tell it like the Zionists said it was in 1967 rather than how it really was. Obviously there are still limits to how far the mainstream media is prepared to go in challenging the Zionist account of history, but it could also be that lazy journalism is a factor in the equation.

For those journalists, lazy or not, who might still have doubts about who started the Six Days War, here’s a quote from what Prime Minister Begin said in an unguarded, public moment in 1982.  “In June 1967 we had a choice. The Egyptian army concentrations in the Sinai approaches did not prove that Nasser was really about to attack us, We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him.”

My own favourite Israeli quote is the one I use to draw the Prologue to Volume One of my book to a conclusion. In 1980 I had a number of conversations with the best and the brightest of Israel’s Directors of Military Intelligence, Major General (then retired) Sholmo Gazit. Over coffee one morning I said to him: “I’ve come to the conclusion that it’s all a myth. Israel’s existence has never, ever, been in danger.” He replied: “The trouble with us Israelis is that we’ve become the victims of our own propaganda.”

In his speech to the ADL dinner, Murdoch said that phase two of the “ongoing war against the Jews” (after the failure to “overrun” Israel by force) was “terrorism” He seems to have no idea of reality on this front either.

One of a number of summary truths about terrorism is this. In Palestine that became Israel, it was the Zionists who turned to terrorism first – to drive out the occupying British and then the indigenous Arabs.

Murdoch spoke of the terrorists targeting Israelis at home and broad – “from the massacre of Israeli athletes at Munich to the second intifada.” Fact: All but two of the Israeli athletes in Munich were killed by German security forces after Israeli Defense Minister Dayan insisted, against Prime Minister Golda Meir’s own best judgement, on a shoot-out to prevent a negotiated end to the hostage drama. Fact: The second intifada, which PLO Chairman Arafat was doing his best to prevent, was provoked by Ariel Sharon to improve his prospects of becoming prime minister by seeing off a challenge from Netanyahu.

A second summary truth about Palestinian terrorism is this. The Palestinians were not and are not “at war with the Jews”. Black September’s Munich operation, for example, was terrorism for a public relations purpose – to draw the attention of the world to the fact that the Palestinians existed, were occupied and oppressed and in need of some justice.

A summary truth about general Arab and wider Muslim terrorism is this. It is primarily a response of the weak and oppressed to Israel’s arrogance of power and insufferable self-righteousness; to the impotence, corruption and repression of Arab and other Muslim regimes which are correctly regarded by their masses as little more than puppets of America-and-Zionism; and to the deadly double-standard of Western foreign policy – in particular its unconditional support for Israel right or wrong. (In at least one respect the  Arab and other Muslim masses have much more wisdom than Western leaders. They, Arab and Muslims masses, know that unconditional support for Israel right or wrong is not in anybody’s best interests, not even those of Israel’s Jews).

According to Murdoch “the war against the Jews” has now entered a new phase. “This,” he said, “is the soft war that seeks to isolate Israel by delegitimizing it. The battleground is everywhere – the media… multinational organizations … NGOs. In this war, the aim is to make Israel a pariah.”

It is true that in the eyes of many if not most peoples of the world (and probably many of their governments behind closed doors) Israel is increasingly being seen as a pariah state. But that’s a consequence of Israel’s policies and actions, war crimes and all.

What Murdoch sees as the rise of anti-Semitism is, in fact, the rise of anti-Israelism. The danger for the Jews of the world is that it will be transformed into violent anti-Semitism at a foreseeable point in the future if the Zionist state is not called and held to account for its past crimes and is allowed by the major powers to go on committing new ones.

It is a fact that prior to the obscenity of the Nazi holocaust, most Jews were opposed to Zionism’s colonial enterprise. One of their fears was that Zionism would one day provoke anti-Semitism if it was allowed by the big powers to have its way. As I never tire of writing and saying, this fear was given a fresh airing by Yehoshafat Harkabi, Israel’s longest serving Director of Military Intelligence. In 1986 he published a remarkable book, Israel’s Fateful Hour. It contains this warning (my emphasis added):

Israel is the criterion according to which all Jews will tend to be judged. Israel as a Jewish state is an example of the Jewish character, which finds free and concentrated expression within it. Anti-Semitism has deep and historical roots. Nevertheless, any flaw in Israeli conduct, which initially is cited as anti-Israelism, is likely to be transformed into empirical proof of the validity of anti-Semitism. It would be a tragic irony if the Jewish state, which was intended to solve the problem of anti-Semitism, was to become a factor in the rise of anti-Semitism. Israelis must be aware that the price of their misconduct is paid not only by them but also Jews throughout the world.

Nearly a quarter of a century on I think it can and should be said that Israel’s “misconduct” has become the prime factor in the equation that could transform anti-Israelism into anti-Semitism.

If I had the opportunity to address Mr. Murdoch directly, I would say to him the following. If you really care about the Jews (I mean the Jews as people as opposed to their money), you would put your media empire at the service of the truth of history.

I would also tell him that when I joined ITN (Independent Television News) as a very young reporter many years ago, its great editor-in-chief, Geoffrey Cox, gave me the mission statement in one short sentence. “Our job is to help keep democracy alive.”

I would then say to Murdoch that my charge today is (generally speaking) that the mainstream media has betrayed democracy. And I would add, “You, sir, are the greatest betrayer, traitor, of them all.”

Alan Hart is a former ITN and BBC Panorama foreign correspondent who covered wars and conflicts wherever they were taking place in the world and specialized in the Middle East.  His Latest book Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews, is a three-volume epic in its American edition.  He blogs on and tweets on

Related post:


The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on October 30, 2010, With Reads Filed under World. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.


  1. Joe Jack Merryweather  November 6, 2010 at 2:01 pm

    I doubt the esteemed Mr. Hart peruses the comments posted after his articles, but I would still like to bestow my heartfelt gratitude upon him and his wonderful insight into the world’s affairs and the state of the media today. You are a very brave man, Mr. Hart, and I thank you. I am also worried that someone may take a disliking to what you have to say, so please be careful. It is all too often that the most rational of us are silenced because their observations shed light upon the true nature of TPTB.

  2. Penumbra  November 1, 2010 at 4:57 pm

    “Lay off the Tin Foil, your conspiracy theory is nuts!”

    Ah the ‘ol classic anti-intellectual mantra raises its head as expected.

    True, no no Zionists under the bed, no evil Islamic “terrorists” either. The latter doesn’t exist and the former prefer more opulent living conditions than I can provide.

    As for taskmasters, I have none, but talk to those who enjoy the TalmudVision spotlight, they could tell you all about them, or not if they wish to continue enjoying the fruits of compliance.

    All said and done, I’ll stick with my aforementioned analysis. Thanks.

  3. OMAtE  November 1, 2010 at 10:57 am

    Lay off the Tin Foil, your conspiracy theory is nuts! There’s no evil Zionist or Jew hiding under your bed, pulling the strings, or controlling anything but their own interests. Your ‘evil’ task masters are much more likely to be found in a church than a temple.

  4. Gordon Duff  October 31, 2010 at 11:14 pm

    No single individual has done more to harm Jews in this world than Rupert Murdoch, not even Abe Foxman.

  5. vinnie  October 31, 2010 at 11:14 pm

    all a bunch of zionist Is–ra–hell bull shit.

  6. Penumbra  October 31, 2010 at 6:40 pm

    Sorry EHM, but there is no such thing as a “jewish genepool” for there is no “Jewish gene”. True Judaism has cultural aspects and codified ritualistic practices of both religious and juridical/societal nature, but they remain predominantly Caucasian (as much as any WASP) at the biological level with some of Berber and a minority of actual semite extraction.

    This concept of “race” to which Zionist lunatics subscribe is kith and kin to the ideological hogwash put forward by those historically identified as NAZIs.

    The reason is that those who provided Nazism with its “philosophical” underpinnings and steered its course in German political history were in fact Jews themselves, or more accurately Frankist Luciferian occultists of “Jewish” descent (Himmler, Goering, Goebbels and others in the top Party positions, even so – it is charged – was Hitler himself).

    To grasp the significance of this is to bring what is otherwise a fairly confusing and conflicting populist narrative of the collaborations and motivations of that era back into a coherent picture. A picture, I might add that also encompasses the earlier and vastly more barbaric Soviet massacre of far greater numbers.

    Frankists, for all that they present themselves as “Jews” (when unavoidably identifiable as such) are nonetheless adherents of the practices of deception and misdirection, often representing themselves as anything (adherents to other religions – Christianity and Islam mostly, even as being Gentiles) that will gain them entrance into whatever fold they seek to disperse, degrade and ultimately destroy. As mentioned in another article’s comments section, even Attaturk the Turkish icon and folk hero, has been shown to have been such a Frankish agent to undermine previous religious underpinnings of Turkish society and to utilize its state to visit brutality and death upon both Turkish-Greek Christians and Armenian Christians.

    With Frankists pulling the strings behind the scenes, even many Zionists have served as useful tools to steering history toward desired pre-determined goals (the establishment of the state of Israel being one such) which ultimately can be seen as a step toward provoking world anger against unwitting Jews in all countries through guilt by association. Because of excommunication of the Frankists/Sabbateans for their vile practices centuries past, they have long vowed to see their religiously Jewish counterparts destroyed along with Christians and Muslims precisely because as “religions of the book” diametrically opposed to humanocentric, NWO aims of Luciferian (Theosophic) occultism.

    Thus, whilst some “jews” are wittingly complicit as occultist agents (Talmudics, Kabbalists), other pawns are drawn from the purely nationalistic Zionist ranks and others from deluded Apocalyptic Christian fundamentalist ranks and yet others for purely self-interested reasons of profit and the illusion of power. But the overarching script has been guided by centuries-old powerful dynastic families who form the core of the Luciferian cabal.

    So in conflicts, whether national or global, they remain behind the scenes, financing both sides, manipulating the rise and fall of leaders, playing the grand chess game whilst letting the front men appear to the public as the ones calling the shots (and taking the blame for failure), while the game progresses in fits and starts all the same. Thus also the illusion of “coincidence” and “chaos theory” that keeps public perception compartmentalized, in the moment, and never connecting the dots back to the actual puppet masters nor to the interconnectedness of events themselves.

    Sure we condemn Zionism (as an ideology) and the State of Israel/Mossad for false flag events, even the US government and military for its interventionist brutalities (overt and covert), and rightly so, but from my perspective they should be condemned as the TOOLS of agenda being played out. Those who scripted the agenda as a cabal, have passed the responsibility for its progress to their progeny and selected disciples from generation to generation and they guard their true convictions scrupulously, maintaining “plausible deniability” at all times in the public sphere.

    After all, when any dare suggest that there is even such thing as Satanists/Luciferians, the mainstream has been long conditioned to assign them to the ranks of UFO and lizard people advocates, regardless of the truth or falsehoods of those latter claims (which have never really grabbed my attention personally).

    Perspective is everything in unraveling the actors and their relative importance to the grand scheme under construction, public disbelief is the mechanism that silences that perspective and seeks to ensure it is not widely appreciated, lest the public awaken and seek to draw back that curtain.

  7. Zenith  October 31, 2010 at 6:26 pm

    Please wake up guys (those who don’t already know): Rupert Murdoch is actually Jewish himself.

    His mother was Elizabeth Joy Greene was a Jewish Australian heiress. This makes Murdoch JEWISH according to Jewish Halacha law.
    It would give this Khazar gentleman the ‘right’ of so-called ‘return’ to ‘Israel’ (i.e. Palestine).

    (Side note: His father, Keith Murdoch was a Scottish, lapsed-Gentile sperm donor.)

    This is why Rupert Murdoch is not ‘ignorant’ or an ‘agent’; he is of the (thirteenth) ‘tribe’.

  8. fixthefuture911  October 31, 2010 at 5:03 pm

    ……new buzzword! 🙂

  9. fixthefuture911  October 31, 2010 at 4:59 pm
    Female Bomb Suspect in Yemen Released, No Charges…
    LAWYER: Being set up…
    ‘Plotters’ Linked to Schools…
    Bomb plot just ‘narrowly averted’…
    …the bombs were set to explode over Western cities in massive mid-air ‘spectaculars’
    FEAR: White House warns there could be more ‘in the mail’…

  10. ElectricHiveMind  October 31, 2010 at 2:31 pm

    Zionism is a word construct. If you’re going to blame words then at least be logical and go to the source, which is Judaism. Research the issue and then realize all those anti-zionist jews and rabbis are deflecting the blame on a scapegoat, either consciously or unconsciusly. Zionism is a tool adapted to a certain political environment, which is now being cast a side like a used clothe.

    Anti-zionism is a theatre steered by kabbalists and rabbis.

    Judaism is no religion as we whites understand the term. It’s a culture, rule set, economical and legal system and codified experience to ensure the survival of jewish genepool amidst foreigners and to guide them to world dominion. Cultures are intellectual reproductions and realizations of respective genepools’ impulses. Think basic biological mating and territorial behaviour. Judaism is the rules of interaction between competing biological groups drawn to it’s ultimate end, which is the total subjugation of other groups and total territorial control. That springs ultimately from jewish genetics.

    ‘Racism’ etc. is to morally deny the other player from using effective moves. Accusing the other of what you are harboring to do to him. Perhaps the best strategy in team games is to aim at the position of rulemaker and umpire, especially if you are playing against an opponent who takes words and imaginary symbols as borders and limits made of stone, and who does not look at the playing field from the birds eye view. Do not get bogged down in analyzing words too much. Look at the power relations, direction of action and demographical dynamics.

    Jews are not part of ‘we’ or ‘us’, anymore than other semites or blacks.

    Religion and culture should be unseparable experience from the people’s existence, which objective should be to manifest the racial impulse and support individual’s intellectual and spiritual development. Our existence on this planet is through our biology. You know what is perhaps the biggest taboo and dogma of the NWO. Any ideology, societal order or religion that doesn’t contribute to it’s constituent biology is unnatural and satanically counter-existence. Civic society based on aracial citizenship is idiocy.

  11. Penumbra  October 31, 2010 at 11:13 am

    Concerning Rupert Murdoch, one must not forget he allowed Anthony Shaffer and Michaël Scheuer to speak out on 9/11.

    He did so because they are leading the way down a blind alley that doesn’t lead to exposure of Mossad/Israeli planning and orchestration of the events of that day.

    Nothing was out of keeping with Faux News’ dedication to disinformation.

  12. Nicole  October 31, 2010 at 10:08 am

    T read these quotations of Zionist leaders is impossible to describe. They lack of everything. No decency, no respect, no exigence……………not even one human quality.

    Concerning Rupert Murdoch, one must not forget he allowed Anthony Shaffer and Michaël Scheuer to speak out on 9/11.

    Who knows the kind of threats Zionists are capable of actively put on a person ?

    These statements have been done after Judge Napolitano’s broadcast.

  13. Debbie Menon  October 31, 2010 at 6:00 am

    Yep! He’s come a long way.

    Read Investigative Journalist John Pilger’s latest :

    He says, if Rupert Murdoch wins control of Sky in Britain, he will command half the television and newspaper market and threaten what is known as public service broadcasting. Although the alarm is ringing, it is unlikely that any government will stop him while his court is packed with politicians of all parties.

  14. Penumbra  October 30, 2010 at 11:28 pm

    There are more than enough sources of mainstream rubbish, a glance at newspaper headlines will suffice, without having to subject your brain and body to the documented damaging effects of Television.

    The addiction that drives people (Lese?) to repeatedly revisit this medium is demonstrative of the narcotic effect it has upon the brain and means utilized by networks to ensure continued exposure and thereby the destructive of cognitive function.

    Better to read the top “stories” online and then proceed to search out reputable analysis from independent investigatory sources or, where possible, primary source data on the subject.

    It’s not even the message that it is most damaging, but rather the medium itself – a propagandists tool par excellence for that very reason.

  15. Debbie Menon  October 30, 2010 at 8:44 pm

    I agree with you Lese Majeste. ditto. We must know the spin first in order to reverse it. For example: Replace all mention of “al Qaeda” wherever it appears, with “Mossad” (who makes war by deception) and you will give readers the entire and accurate picture. Quote: Jeff Gates, Gordon Duff, Maidhc O’ Cathail, Alan Hart, Paul Balles, Franklin Lamb, Grant Smith, Phil Giraldi, Ray McGovern, Stuart Littlewood…

    “Israel and its’ apologists, need to be treated like it treats others, it doesn’t understand decent, democratic, diplomatic language.” The problem is that NOBODY is in a position to treat them as deserved and be heard.

    I was taught by my father, “that a bully will take your tolerance as weakness. You must respond in the same language he understands.”

    Gaza will continue to remain under siege, settlements will continue to be built, and Israel will continue to thumb its nose at everyone until enough of those who pretend to be fair overcome their fear of the main bully.

    Eventually, some of the so-called progressive Hosts on Cable TV will have to deal with the truth that haunts their sleepless nights. When that happens, Helen Thomas will have the support she deserves.

  16. Marvin  October 30, 2010 at 5:20 pm

    anti-GENTILISM preceeded “antisemitism”. Anti-GENTILISM is the cause of so-called “antisemitism”. HUMANITY did not invent “antisemitism” and then wait thousands of years for Jews to appear, just so everybody could “hate” them for absolutely no reason. Judaism codified anti-GENTILISM, their hatred of ALL NON-jews, and the only SANE reaction of any NON-jew is self defense, which the “Tribe” calls antisemitism. Judaism consciously chose to separate itself from the Family Of Man, labeling ALL non-Jews GOYIM, GENTILE, SHISKA, and infusing Judaism’s very soul with venom toward ALL NON-jews.
    Go research the instigators of the First Christian SHOAHs, that is RIGHT, instigated and carried out by Jews, what was Saul of Tarsus doing, HUH?!
    March 2000 Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, leader of Chabad-Lubavitch:
    “The difference between a Jewish and a non-Jewish person stems from the common expression: ‘Let us differentiate.’ Thus, we do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely on a superior level. Rather, we have case of ‘let us differentiate’ between totally different species. This is what needs to be said about the body: the body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of (members) of all nations of the world… A non-Jew’s entire reality is only vanity. The entire creation (of a non-Jew) exists only for the sake of the Jews.”

  17. jack seyz  October 30, 2010 at 4:57 pm

    A,Murdock is a front man. He was recruited years ago when he owned 2 junk papers down under. His owners at the time were 4 guys with money. Rothchild. Broufman, oppenheimer, and amand hammer. The whole history and story was in the spotlight/american free press.

  18. Lese Majeste  October 30, 2010 at 4:32 pm

    No can do. Have to watch FOX and CNN at times to find out what sort of Zionist lies and BS they’re spinning.

    But I only allow myself 4-5 minutes at at a time, otherwise, I get this powerful urge to throw a heavy object at the TV—TALMUDVISION.

  19. Anthony Clifton  October 30, 2010 at 2:08 pm

    J. Speer Williams wrote a piece concerning the covinous cullusion between the currency printers and the “Media”. From Eustace Mullins’ work -The Curse of Canaan to the Encyclopedia of The Palestine Problem by Issa Nakhleh, the issue remains the same…The Children of Israel have never been “Jewish”, and the Khazar/Ashkenazim proselytes to Talmudic Judaism will never be the Israelites – EVER. Time for the world to demand the Khazars return to Khazaria…or be reduced to ashes, with the edomite MONEYCHANGERS…Say, did anybody see the Al Quida pancake makers in Dallas ? They levelled four buildings for the First Baptist Khazar worshipping CIRCUS in Downtown Dallas, not far from the Federal Reserve Bank, Masonic Lodge, and the infamous Dealey Plaza Sixth floor Window….that overlooks the REFLECTING POOL…..

  20. john  October 30, 2010 at 1:58 pm

    Koldo, you should no by now there is no honor amongst these people. They actual believe that every lie,action of deciet,murder, and historical falsehoods are excusable and approved by God if it is done for the advancement of Zionism. Only a pathetic and sick fool would believe this.

  21. Koldo  October 30, 2010 at 1:33 pm

    Abraham Foxman, wealthy and controversial chief of the Anti Defamation League, likes to refer to himself as a “Holocaust survivor.” As a biography on this website shows, he was not even born when Hitler invaded his native Poland, and he was looked after by Polish Catholics throughout the war; his parents also “survived”, in fact he also said “I’m becoming convinced more and more every day that the reason anti-Semitism is out there more is this highway, this transmitter belt,” Abraham Foxman told about 350 people gathered for the ADL’s national executive committee meeting, which runs through Sunday at The Breakers. “These blogs circulate it and reinforce it, and so there’s more of it.”On the Internet, neo-Nazis and Holocaust deniers have at least the same potential audience as Web sites that promote peace, love and understanding. But Foxman confessed frustration at finding an effective way to combat the Internet’s potential for inflaming bigotry.
    So, with kind of friends what can you expect of Murdoch? His daughter married a zionist, and so on. SO we only have Internet which has proved an outstanding weapon against the jews and zionist, because nobody believes the Media concerning the official version of WWII, and the Middle East (Gaza included).

  22. Penumbra  October 30, 2010 at 1:16 pm

    Lese, no matter what network you WATCH, you’ll never be watching NEWS. Mass media delivers only mental pablum, half truths and outright lies (in short: propaganda). To be informed requires active personal research, not passive reception of decontextualized, sanitized scripted drivel.

    My advice, turn off the TV and keep it off, it destroys the brain and actually interferes with bodily hormone levels that regulate sleep patterns and cognitive function.

  23. john  October 30, 2010 at 8:34 am

    Mr. Hart, what should be noted here is that Rupert Murdoch was not always this way. When he first bought the New York Post over 30 years ago the Jews were in an uproar. He actually ran editorials critical of Israel. He was an Australian who thought the media was truly “free”. His recent remarks are a by-product of years of Zionist intimidation, he has successfully been put in his place and is acting accordingly. Another once threat to the Zionist dominatiom of the American mass media was Ted Turner. He vowed that the Jews would not run him out of the media. Well history has shown us otherwise. The Zionists in America will not tolerate anything less than full obedience to Israeli Supremacy in the American media.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

From Veterans Today Network