By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor

One out of seven news outlets have noticed, thus far, that Wikileaks seems to have a “soft heart” when it comes to Israel and India.  Zbigniew Brzezinski caught on, finally, declaring that Wikileaks is an “intelligence operation” using “pointed” information carefully “seeded” into a combination of minor scandals and chickenfeed.

There is absolutely no question for the press that Wikileaks is totally phony, we all know it, it is blatantly slanted, clearly not only anti-American but aimed at Islam, the easy target of all time.  Wikileaks is also trying to be more and more clever about seeming less the Mossad “game theory” construct that we all know it is.   The “clever” is fun to watch, more “ham handed” than esoteric.


Much of the press seems to have gotten “talking points” from somewhere, leading them to the material Brzezinski picked up when he “trashed” Wikileaks.  We did the “math” on the Afghanistan leak.  80% of the stories to hit the media mentioned Pakistan aiding the Taliban.  We did the actual count and found 38 reports out of 92,000 documents that were unsubstantiated reports of Pakistani activity in Afghanistan.

Something about this had a terrible smell.  It should have taken weeks to find the Pakistan stuff but the press had it all immediately.  Brzezinski is right, Wikileaks is something very wrong packaged to look very innocent.  We saw the same thing in the Iraq “dump,” all about imaginary secret agents from Iran.

We are seeing it again, Israel the hero, sparkling clean, a land of angels and wizards, surrounded by dirty Arabs and Paki’s and now, seemingly worst of all, the corrupt and inept Americans, exposed for what they are, OK, almost exposed except for one thing, everything Americans are accused of in Wikileaks was done in support of Israel, at the direction of their powerful AIPAC lobby.  Nothing of this is mentioned nor the fact that the leaders in Washington who formulated the policies Wikileaks is trashing are, largely, Israeli citizens.

Is Wikileaks planning, some day, to expose this gang, and show America to be the biggest victim of all?

If it looks too good to be true, trust me on this, run like hell!


Put yourself in the place of a decent and honest reporter.  You wait, your pulse pounding, 92,000 documents.  You have your entire staff, the obits guy, the restaurant critic, all sitting up at your house, pounding down tequila and espresso.  Five of you and 92,000 documents, that’s 18,400 each.  You can each scan only 500 documents an hour, that’s a day and a half, but you have a deadline and your Wikileaks lead story has to be in for the morning paper.

You get a text message to check your email.  You have a list of articles there, the real “gold” among the senseless time wasting “chaff.” You have one of those moments of moral dilemma.   For a real reporter, in the real world, that moment came and went without notice.


You can now make the deadline, and you have the lead story, Pakistan is running the Taiban, murdering American troops, Iranians are swimming the Euphrates, bringing IED’s into Iraq and a 74 year old grandfather from Rawalpindi is managing world terrorism when he isn’t on CNN.

You’ve been Wiki-had!


With reporters finding, just the right places in Wikileaks, we wanted to look at the odds.  Golfing is a good comparison, so we checked the odds of someone getting a “hole in one” playing golf.  Is finding the right articles in Wikileaks easier or harder than getting a “hole in one” playing golf?

In 1999, Golf Digest reported, “One insurance company puts a PGA Tour pro’s chances at 1 in 3,756 and an amateur’s at 1 in 12,750.”

That same issue reported that the “odds of an amateur making two holes-in-one in a round are 9,222,500 to 1.”

Ireland’s National Hole in One Club puts the odds a little lower for one ace: “The estimated odds of acing a hole with any given swing are one in 33,000.”

And an article in the magazine Navy Newsstand, citing Sports Illustrated as its source, put the odds at 45,000 to 1 for “scoring a hole-in-one on a typical par-3 golf hole.”

This is the comparison we came up with.  With our odds, were there only one Wikileak, at 4,130 compared to “hole in one” odds for a golfing pro at 3,756, the analogy works.  Thus, 38 out of 92,000 articles is about the same as getting a hole in one.  However, when you consider this is the 3rd straight hole in one for Wikileaks, the odds figure to be well over 20 million to one against.  Wikileaks beats the odds bigtime. 

We call this “the luck of the press.”  

I am a member of the press, maybe, if I am lucky, I can find a $50,000 check and first class air to Israel in my mailbox.  Any bets on my chances?



Oh, you didn’t know we “farmed out” our intelligence?  This is illegal, of course.  Did America have private companies, some owned by Israelis, operating in Afghanistan, companies tied directly to the Mossad, producing intelligence reports that were then picked out by Wikileaks then hand fed to the press.  Let’s do the math.

This is the kind of thing former National Security Advisor Brzezinski is talking about.  It is also what  others in the media are talking about.  Today, Wayne Madsen on Russia Today spoke of the same thing, how Wikileaks seems aimed directly at the enemies of Israel.  Madsen, as with so many others, makes the point that Wikileaks is, as he says it, “cherrypicking” intelligence that seems to make Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu very happy.

YouTube - Veterans Today -


The last few days, Paul Craig Roberts and I have been trading emails, a three way debate with Robbie the Pict (actual name), a well known UK activist.  Paul wrote this today:

“For example, the US print and TV media and the US government have made it completely clear that they have no regard for the First Amendment. Consider CNN’s Wolf Blitzer’s reaction to the leaked diplomatic cables that reveal how the US government uses deceptions, bribes, and threats to control other governments and to deceive the American and other publics. Blitzer is outraged that information revealing the US government’s improprieties reached the people, or some of them. As Alexander Cockburn wrote, Blitzer demanded that the US government take the necessary steps to make certain that journalists and the American people never again find out what their government is up to.”
So many, honorable people who have “fought the good fight” so long, like Roberts, have been hungry for something to hold on to that Wikileaks is defended to the last without the objectivity such things require.  I was someone who, on 9/11, never imagined Osama bin Laden.  My first words, “Oh g-d, I didn’t think they would do it.”

I meant Bush and Cheney.  This is how I think, after all, I grew up “bad,” a Detroit kid.  Now, finally, Geraldo Rivera tells me I was right all along.  I never had doubts, I only wondered how long it would take, not for the truth to come out, nobody wants the truth, but for it to become profitable to exploit the conspiracy.  Welcome to that one.

Now we have divisions, those I call “Israeli shills” teamed with those who see the extremely flawed and even diseased Wikileaks as a big win because it supports the fight they have had against American duplicity.  When is a “big win” a big loss?
My good friend, Paul Andrew Mitchell, had to remind me, Assange is an “odd duck” as a “whistleblower.”  He supports war, any war, anytime, anywhere.  Assange may be the last man alive to support, without question, the 9/11 Commission but is planning to revealing the truth about space aliens and UFO’s.  In fact, as Mitchell points out, there isn’t a hair’s difference between the Mossad and CIA agenda and Wikileaks.
Even better, the Neocons are using Wikileaks as an excuse to censor the internet, multiple bills are in the works already, all conveniently timed to control the explosive 9/11 and AIPAC scandals that are the only real threats to Israel.
No wonder Assange is able to hide in plain site.

Those of us who know the real power in America, how Israeli “firsters” managed the Bush administration, always under AIPAC’s thumb, not just into two wars but financial disaster.  It is in the news now, every day and has for years, for those who care to read it.   People like Roberts and Cockburn are right, America has been a nightmare.  What they seem to be hiding from, that infamous “third rail” in American journalism, the one that took down Helen Thomas and so many others, they are hiding from the obvious truth that the corrupt government they are trying to unmask doesn’t have an American face underneath.

It is Israel behind that mask and Wikileaks is simply a mask beneath a mask, or as Jeff Gates puts it, “psyops and game theory.”
When are we going to read a Wikileak about organ theft rings or white phosphorous and American cluster bombs used against civilians in Gaza?  Instead, we get “chickenfeed” about a politician?
Where are the Wikileaks on torture, rendition, Dr. Aafia or the phony intelligence on Iraq that led to the invasion in 2003?  We are still waiting for a Wikileak on Israel’s friend, Chalabi, the wanted criminal America made Prime Minister of Iraq, a decision that led to a full scale civil war.

Wikileaks is like mother’s milk to people who have starved for openness and justice.

Wikileaks is mother’s milk laced with arsenic.

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on December 6, 2010, With Reads Filed under Veterans. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.


  1. AgainJihadistsMurderGloballyAndIdiotsBlameTheVictim  December 9, 2010 at 2:50 pm

    Oh boy, I have seen “thoeries” but not as bad as this one, oh, well why not dump everything on the zionists, an easy target, but it really doesn’t add up. What is “soft” spot for Israel? exposing ANY (!!!) anti-terror security files is BAD for Israel, you fool.
    Has it ever occured to youy that most of wikileak files are simply the TRUTH-FILES? Truth hurts, huh?

    In this age of cooperation of KKK/Neo-Nazis working together with ‘inferior’ Arab-Muslim extremist-jihadiosts, anything demonizing anti-Zionists is OK.
    And, with that all garbage: the never-self-convinced-911conspiracy-theroies… the Jihadi murderers will continue to target the innocent in: Britain, Denmark, Spain, Israel, Lebanon, Iraq, Afghjanistan, Pakistan, Thailand, Russia, Somalia, Nigeria, etc,…

  2. Michael J Volz  December 9, 2010 at 9:57 am

    Exactly –That has been the plan from the beginning. Make the USA the scapegoat for the Jewish war on Islam.


  3. Michael J Volz  December 9, 2010 at 9:51 am

    Gordon is a little weak on his knowledge of Detroit. Maybe he knows more on Windsor ON? Their strip joints are better than Five Mile in Detroit. He got all the negative defamation on Henry Ford (from the jews?) but missed the real story. Henry Ford, not Obama may be America’s messiah.


  4. Michael J Volz  December 9, 2010 at 9:07 am

    I think you forgot the AIG fraud——how a “smart” jew (Morris Hank Greenberg) lost over 208 billion in 2008? Even that figure is understated because the assets on the statement for 2008 were over valued.

    The entire GM bankruptcy assets amounted to only 75 billion. Hank’s loss for 2008 had to be a worlds record for a one year loss but not mentioned in the Zio-Media .


  5. Michael J Volz  December 9, 2010 at 9:02 am

    Good questions Fix. Did you mention the wikileaks on the Talmud or did I miss it?


  6. Michael J Volz  December 9, 2010 at 8:58 am

    There was no need for him to know ; better if he didn’t know because he might spill the beans. All Bush knew was to do what the “smart” jews tell you to do and all will be well!


  7. Craig Pepe  December 7, 2010 at 11:26 pm

    the thing is, I am not fighting you,

    sometimes you strike a nerve, and I react agressively

    but I am really not fighting you

    I told you

    I hate the guy RON Paul

    we have a naturaly antagonism

    but I dont see myself at war with you

  8. Craig Pepe  December 7, 2010 at 11:24 pm

    I have fought 1000′s of assholes like you.


    I sense that you have experience

  9. John  December 7, 2010 at 11:19 pm

    “I’m calling Duff on his bullshit.”

    That’s YOUR domain.

    “He’s no different that Assange and MSM.”

    You’re not too swift, either.


  10. John  December 7, 2010 at 11:12 pm

    “You can’t get cell phone calls at 30,000 feet. The call was the only source of information to mention terrorists with box cutters, and now we know from the FBI that it was faked.

    In 2006 the truth movement learned that flight 77 had no onboard phones. The boing 757′s made for America had no onboard phones. In 2006 the FBI’s new story is that there were no calls from Barbara Olson.”

  11. Ron Paul 2012  December 7, 2010 at 10:40 pm

    I love watching you try do do damage control Pepe.
    Do you think the moderators of V.T. were born yesterday?
    I have fought 1000’s of assholes like you.

    I love watching you think your clever, because you’re not.

    Another shill bites the dust.


  12. Craig Pepe  December 7, 2010 at 10:33 pm

    your other accusations are subjective,

  13. Craig Pepe  December 7, 2010 at 10:33 pm

    I am gonna have to say

    no I am not a shill

    based on those two deifinitions

  14. Craig Pepe  December 7, 2010 at 10:29 pm

    from dictionary dot com

    shill   /ʃɪl/ Show Spelled
    [shil] Show IPA
    Slang .
    1. a person who poses as a customer in order to decoy others into participating, as at a gambling house, auction, confidence game, etc.
    2. a person who publicizes or praises something or someone for reasons of self-interest, personal profit, or friendship or loyalty.

    wasnt exact;ly sure what a shill was

    now I am gonna read the definition and see if I am a shill

  15. Ron Paul 2012  December 7, 2010 at 10:07 pm

    Pepe is a pathetic, desperate shill.
    I love watching him suffer in defeat.

    Right Pepe?
    It was a passive but valiant attempt, I’ll give you that.
    But unfortunately, you still suck at this.

  16. Ron Paul 2012  December 7, 2010 at 10:02 pm


    Pepe, your shilling is becoming more obvious by the second.
    And very desperate I might add.


  17. Craig Pepe  December 7, 2010 at 9:44 pm

    of course you would have to know the holy spirit in order to frogive it


    of course you would have to know the holy spirit in order to blaspheme it

  18. Craig Pepe  December 7, 2010 at 9:43 pm

    Intenionally decieving people is NEVER forgivable

    well again,

    its about blaspheming the holy spirit

    that specifically is what is unforgiveable

    of course you would have to know the holy spirit in order to frogive it

    so, even an asshole like you B Gush is OK

    I dont think you know the holy spirit, so you cant blaspheme something you dont know

    you can still end up in hell for your stubborn refusal to accept Jesus Christ

    and hell of course sucks

    but you dont have to end up there

  19. Craig Pepe  December 7, 2010 at 8:35 pm

    just in case the guy i called an asshole

    is reading this and is not sure what to say

    and he doesnt have a bible

    go to


    there is a passage that I want to talk about with you

  20. Craig Pepe  December 7, 2010 at 8:32 pm

    ron paul is the kind of that guy that shows up at exactly the wrong time saying exactly the wrong thing

  21. Ron Paul 2012  December 7, 2010 at 7:59 pm

    Do us a favor and leave troll/shill.
    You are clearly only here to disrupt the conversation.

    You’re not fooling anyone.

  22. Craig Pepe  December 7, 2010 at 5:14 pm

    do me a favor take out your bible

  23. Craig Pepe  December 7, 2010 at 5:10 pm

    but lucky for you I am in the mood to work on you a little bit

  24. Craig Pepe  December 7, 2010 at 5:09 pm


  25. Craig Pepe  December 7, 2010 at 5:09 pm

    two words

    Jesus Christ

    your what I would call


    difficult person

  26. B. Gush  December 7, 2010 at 4:47 pm


    Please don’t insult my intelligence with references to religion until you can grasp the fact that every empire since the beginning of time used religion as a tool to control the populace and make them docile, except of course when violence suited them in their conquests. “god wills it” has been the battle cry for many a slaughter in the name of various deities, none of which showed up to protect their proponents from being destroyed themselves.

    Intenionally decieving people is NEVER forgivable, as is the case in matters of which I speak.

    Alpha Beta espiritu santo mucho gusto abe men

  27. OS  December 7, 2010 at 3:08 pm

    Be careful, email account was just hijacked.

  28. Craig Pepe  December 7, 2010 at 2:10 pm

    I look jewish, you are not the only one

  29. Craig Pepe  December 7, 2010 at 1:24 pm

    b gush

    Jesus Christ forgives you no matter how much of an asshole you are

    just dont blaspheme the holy spirit

    thats unforgiveable

  30. Craig Pepe  December 7, 2010 at 1:21 pm

    dont ask dont tell—> dont ask dont care or maybe dont ask

    or maybe just


  31. Craig Pepe  December 7, 2010 at 1:18 pm

    yes I am a CHristian

    I cuss too much

    I am working on that and other self improvement projects as well

  32. B. Gush  December 7, 2010 at 1:03 pm

    Looks like I have been censored for my opinion. People need to beware Mr. Duff is on the same side as Assange and al-CIAduh.

    “Zbigniew Brzezinski caught on, finally, declaring that Wikileaks is an “intelligence operation””

    Anyone portraying Brzezinski as symathetic, when he was the mastermind behind getting the Mujahadin to “go over there and take that land. It’s yours. God gave it to you” when the CIA, ISI, and Mossad were creating al-CIAduh, is being deliberately misleading.

    I’m calling Duff on his bullshit. He’s no different that Assange and MSM. At a time when the spin on everything is enough to give you a headache people need to realize this guy is a TOOL of the government and their disinformation agents.

    It won’t be up for long so I hope enough people get the message to be careful with this guy.

  33. Syed Zaidi  December 7, 2010 at 10:57 am

    Chris Bollyn’s website has some fascinating pictures of the former and current Mrs Ted Olsons. The underlying bone structure is very similar, but the more malleable parts of the “two ladies” are different. Remember all the fantasies in the early days of the 9/11 truth movement that Barbara Olson had been found. Well, it seems she might just have been. Not somewhere in Eastern Europe, but right there with Mr Olson.

  34. Syed Zaidi  December 7, 2010 at 10:43 am

    ZB — along with his four offspring — was slated for some prominence in the Obama administration, but it didn’t work. He is an old-fashioned American imperialist impatient with Israel, and once gleefully spoke of American forces knocking out Israeli bombers over Iraq on their way to Iran. But there is just no space for a non-Zionist in any top position in the American establishment. Chas Freeman’s nomination to a post not requiring Congressional approval was as close as Obama got, and look what happened there. ZB is talking like the non-insider he is, and probably getting a little satisfaction out of it. But I am sure it burns him that American imperialism is not really American any more.

  35. Craig Pepe  December 7, 2010 at 9:49 am

    A lot of people think George Bush ordered 911

    not me

    I think thats a bunch of bull shit

  36. Wiki Warts  December 7, 2010 at 7:16 am

    Wikileaks founder Julian Assange arrested in London
    Julian Assange denies sexually assaulting the two women
    7 December 2010 bbc

    WikiLeaks will release encrypted ‘doomsday file’ if site blocked December 5, 2010 ny post

    That instantaeous diplo-bomb didnt go off…?

  37. Ron Paul 2012  December 7, 2010 at 3:37 am


    He wouldn’t take it down.

    1. First the perps would short the stock.
    2. Then the “leaks” are released.
    3. The bank in question takes a serious financial hit.
    4. The perps cash in on their put options.
    5. Then the government bails out the bank with taxpayer money.

    In other words, it’s just another way for the perps to loot the taxpayers of more money and the bank walks away…

  38. Miller  December 7, 2010 at 3:29 am

    True, we are amazingly slow on the take here. I think if the NWO ever announced the US as the First Place candidate for its advanced eugenics program, millions of idiots here would be hooting and high-fiving each other over beating out the worldwide competition- no interest at all in learning what the word means. 🙂

  39. Behold a Pale Horse  December 7, 2010 at 2:30 am

    There were others who supposedly did make cell calls. All fake, esp as the charges didnt show up on relatives perusal of the “deads” phone bill.

  40. Gordon Duff  December 7, 2010 at 1:56 am

    barbara olsen used the seat back phones for her calls….phones that were not installed on that plane

  41. Behold a Pale Horse  December 7, 2010 at 1:41 am

    Great Patriot Navy Vet William Cooper on the coming UFO scam as the ‘ultimate psyops’ to bring in World Gov:


  42. Behold a Pale Horse  December 7, 2010 at 1:36 am

    If you travel across the world, its clear talking to most people: they already know Israel and CIA were behind 911. Many knew from the very beginning. The world is not in the same kind of denial as we natives are, nor are they seduced by wur aggrandised self-image as we are. Plus many have been at the receiving end of US foreign policy firsthand and see the signs.

    In the 2000 elections, a Panamanian friend asked if there were riots over the “election” coup being staged by the gov? “They dont know thats what it is- America has no idea.” He couldnt believe it.

  43. Behold a Pale Horse  December 7, 2010 at 1:30 am

    Bush Jr may have been too indiscrete a loose cannon to be pre-informed on 911, too drugged, drunk or fractured. Recall at times he spoke with a slur. His handlers must have white knuckled his ad hoc ad libbed Q & A’s as God only knows what classified info could have slipped off that dingbat’s tongue. Its one thing to control a criminal by blackmail, alot harder to control one who is impetuous or unstable.

  44. Behold a Pale Horse  December 7, 2010 at 1:22 am

    Ted Olson’s wife Barbara who was on one of the flights and made the famous cell call to Ted (3 yrs before that technology existed from that altitude) was allegedly arrested at a border crossing in eastern Europe.

  45. Behold a Pale Horse  December 7, 2010 at 1:17 am

    Wiki leakage is nothing more than the mainstream media masquerading as whistleblowers. CASS SUNSTEIN folks. He wrote the policy on this strategy.

  46. Brian  December 7, 2010 at 1:14 am

    Perhaps later on Bush realized the “Osama did 911” scenario wasn’t bolstered by any evidence. Perhaps he learned Osama wasn’t wanted for the crime by the FBI.

    He may have been concerned about talking to the 911 commission because he was going to be asked in a nice way why he was so incompetent on the day of the 911 attacks.

    I think major 911 websites are run by Zionists. They won’t allow any information about the Mossad 911 connection at the websites. They will allow information that indicates Bush and Cheney did it.

    The Zionists are surreptitiously pushing the “Bush did 911” theory as a distraction from the real culprits, the Mossad.

  47. Miller  December 6, 2010 at 11:55 pm

    All I know is he sure was visibly nervous when the press queried him about answering questions for the 9/11 Commission. He definitely knew something and that’s why he wasn’t permitted to testify under oath but finally agreed to “drop by and chat” (or however he phrased it). And if he was kept in the dark prior to 9/11 Jeb (PNAC) and Marvin set their own brother Fredo up bigtime to be the stooge who they could all count on to play the useful idiot.

  48. Brian  December 6, 2010 at 11:29 pm


    A lot of people think George Bush ordered 911. Perhaps you’re suggesting he just wasn’t involved in the planning of the attacks.

    He may have been part of the cover up. He was a stooge for AIPAC. I agree with Gordon’s anonymous Whitehouse insider.

    Bush was clueless. I don’t think he knew that it was a Mossad operation and I don’t think he knew who the 911 traitors within the US government were. He used to take naps during the day when he was governor of Texas.

    AIPAC and Cheney ran the Whitehouse. Bush ws told what to do. If you look at the time-line of what Bush did after the second plane hit the twin towers it’s hilarious. He did not act like a Commander and Chief.

    The real power players wanted him out of the way and via his lack of action he became the #1 suspect to the alternative theory crowd. Well played by the Mossad and their helpers.

  49. foo  December 6, 2010 at 10:58 pm

    The WikiLeaks events are not just political theater — they are political theater of the absurd.

    The WikiLeaks site — wikileaks.org — is down. Well, no, it isn’t. It has been taken off DNS (Domain Name Servers) — the computers that translate the name of a site to its actual numerical address.

    If you enter the actual numerical address:

    you will access wikileaks.org. I got that address by typing wikileaks into google; the sixth entry shows that address. Hiding in plain site (pun fully intended.)

    According to the New York Post


    Assange has posted an encrypted “insurance file” on the site:

    “Assange has warned he can divulge the classified documents in the insurance file and similar backups if he is detained or the WikiLeaks website is permanently removed from the internet…”

    I’m surprised that he hasn’t threatened to hold his breath until he turns blue.

    Karl Marx got it right:

    “History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce.”

  50. Miller  December 6, 2010 at 10:37 pm

    Yeah, if they really wanted to silence him he’d have been dead a good while ago. Instead he’s utilizing mainstream media outlets to spread his info. That in combination with his total acceptance of the official 9/11 story is enough to discredit him.

  51. plumbob  December 6, 2010 at 10:32 pm

    Of course George Bush was involved in 9/11 and played a crucial role in it’s implementation. It is obvious that all three buildings came down from controlled demolition, and it is a matter of public record that George’s brother, Marvin Bush was on the board of directors for Securacom, the security company in charge of security at the WTC complex as well as Dulles International Airport from which the Pentagon plane departed. (An Israelite run company named ICTS was in charge of security at all the other airports) Unlike the Kennedy Assassination, 9/11 was a relatively simple operation, and anyone can easily figure it out simply by putting all the numbered players on the board and connecting the dots. Hell, I don’t think they really care who knows it.

  52. Dave-O  December 6, 2010 at 9:40 pm

    Ok once again Gordon Duff opens my eyes to the truth, I must confess at first I’m all oh well on some things Duff is right on. But I thought any news is good news turns out that was a false understanding of the many different levels of information being released. The lack of Israel “sensitive leaks” are very telling indeed and this arrest on site media bull sh*t is a fn joke this was one of the major turning points of my opinion on this release of info.

    Question for G Duff, do you think this was moved forward as a psyop because the scanner scanning uproar was exposing the links between Homeland Security and the Neo Zions.

    Just wondering because the Israel Neo Con government of Canada made a little statement today that they are fast tracking the screening procedures of cargo and border traffic effective immediately.

  53. fixtheticket  December 6, 2010 at 9:23 pm

    …..If the Mossad becomes the #1 suspect throughout the world for the 911 attacks….
    …’IF’ ?? 🙂 🙂

  54. Miller  December 6, 2010 at 9:14 pm

    I don’t think anyone suspects George Bush of “masterminding” anything, but do you really think he was sincerely oblivious to taking part in the cover-up? Do you think Bush has been stating what he honestly believes to be true ever since 9/11?

  55. rachel  December 6, 2010 at 8:51 pm

    wikileaks is the next dog and poney show. it’s the next “obama” show. Most of the people know wikileaks cherry picks what it will release. It’s all he said/she said BS.

    wikileaks in itself is the distraction.

  56. rachel  December 6, 2010 at 8:51 pm

    wikileaks is the next dog and poney show. it’s the next “obama” show. Most of the people know wikileaks cherry picks what it will release. It’s all he said/she said BS.

    wikileaks in itself is the distraction.

  57. Brian  December 6, 2010 at 8:42 pm

    Oops! should be “attract” attention to themselves.

  58. Brian  December 6, 2010 at 8:35 pm

    Yes indeed it’s a great nugget.

    I have posted this at VT before but if you have not seen it the article from the link is a must read:

    Atta and the supposed hijackers were supposedly devout fundamentalist Muslims and their drinking and womanizing doesn’t make sense. Read this amazing article which is a must read about Mohamed Atta and two other supposed hijackers. This is from the article: “They were talking about what a bad place America is. They said ‘Wait ’til tomorrow. America is going to see bloodshed,”‘ said John Kap, manager of the Pink Pony and Red Eyed Jack’s Sports Bar. I don’t think terrorists would want to attack attention to themselves and jeopardize their mission. Kap said he also told the FBI they spent money on drinks and lap dances.

    Also, it would have been ridiculous for Atta and his two colleagues to be in Florida the eve before 911 because if the flight to Portland Maine or the connecting flight to the airport in Boston had been delayed the hijacking operation would have been at risk. The very stunning Atta information that shows he was being impersonated at bars and making a spectacle of himself starts with the paragraph that begins with: The Friday before the attacks.


  59. fixtheticket  December 6, 2010 at 8:32 pm

    be patient,wait for it ,
    the wikileak reality show

  60. fixtheticket  December 6, 2010 at 8:29 pm

    the UFO’s are powered by magical box cutters & fire-proof passports and have Dual-Planetship

  61. NightFlyer  December 6, 2010 at 8:25 pm

    It’s meant to not add up. It’s a great distraction by those who brought bthe world the USS Liberty, 9/11, and whose knows what! Definitely a wash women back fence gossip moment. Which brings me too, What isn’t there and should be? Ah, the real truth such as whose hand are all these pointing fingers from anyway? Yes, it’s probably Mossad and company. Might even be from whomever is the silent (karl rowe type) character working for the president himself.

    Definitely a distraction while end of the year money moves around. Check the yellow and pink sheets for bankrucpy and closings as of Dec 31. That list always reads like the ho’s who meaning those who received huge sums of money; pumped and dumped etc.

    Notice how slick willie has not been in the news? Leaks, rumors, a whole lot of humor as they laugh all the way to the bank. Is that bank now in Africa? Yeah,

  62. Soap Box  December 6, 2010 at 8:20 pm

    Please guys, don’t spoil the UFO release for me.. 🙂

  63. OS  December 6, 2010 at 7:55 pm

    Correction, exterminated. Good news huh.

  64. OS  December 6, 2010 at 7:54 pm

    Graig, no need to worry, I have already been terminated.

  65. YIORKOS  December 6, 2010 at 7:47 pm

    Like always, Great, rational,brave analysis and fuctual view Gordon! Keep it up and, unless the Zionists control that organization too, you should receive the Nobel “TRUTH” prize!!! As the logical antidote to the phony masterminded wikileak I suggest you compile and release all your fine documentaries as the “TRUTH-LEAKS”!

  66. Cloak and Dagger  December 6, 2010 at 7:34 pm

    Thanks for that link. I had not read that article before and that nugget about Eddie Shalev is the clincher for this being a Mossad operation. Boggles the mind!

  67. Dan  December 6, 2010 at 7:11 pm

    Why is Assange threatening to reveal “lots” of damning information about BP? Could it be that this information would so devastate the Obama administration regarding its handling of the spill as to effectively neutralize any opposition to war with Iran on the President’s part? Some months ago on CNBC, for several days Larry Kudlow launched into vicious attacks on BP, not because of the spill, but for the involvement of BP (formerly the Anglo-Iranian Oil Co) with Iran. This was an agenda. So, are the people on Wall Street whom Kudlow speaks for part of the game? Can anyone connect the dots on WikiLeaks between the desire to punish BP for its Iranian connections, the threat to take down America’s banking system, and war on Iran?

  68. Cloak and Dagger  December 6, 2010 at 7:05 pm

    I speculated on the remote control myself. I am also of the belief that planes were empty – no passengers or pilots. Remember some of the 19 patsies showed up alive a few days later.

  69. Joe  December 6, 2010 at 7:05 pm

    I find it hilarious that Assange claims that he could take down a major US bank with his leaks. If he had that power, he would be dead before he could make the claim or he would be a member of the bank’s senior management. How ignorant does a person have to be of the way the world works to know that it does not work in the Assange would have us believe?

  70. Craig Pepe  December 6, 2010 at 7:02 pm

    instead of hardball it should be called

    a bunch of huge assholes that deserve to get their asses kicked

  71. Craig Pepe  December 6, 2010 at 7:00 pm

    Dan goes there

    what an asshole

  72. Craig Pepe  December 6, 2010 at 6:59 pm

    my bad I am making light of serious things

  73. Craig Pepe  December 6, 2010 at 6:57 pm

    If I were a bad person, I would have so much fun f—king with OS

  74. OS  December 6, 2010 at 6:11 pm

    Gordon, what years in the Banking Industry in this country, or there about. Abroad or in the States?

  75. Craig Pepe  December 6, 2010 at 6:07 pm

    fix wutcha drinking today?

  76. Brian  December 6, 2010 at 5:49 pm

    Why would terrorists ask incompetent pilots to fly the attacks planes? The Mossad used them as patsies because the planes were flown by remote control.

    Eddie Shalev was the man who certified the incompetent pilot Hanjour to rent a Cessna 172 just three days after Marcel Bernard the chief instructor at Freeway refused to rent Hanjour the very same plane. The shocker is that Eddie Shalev is an Israeli and served in the Israeli army.


  77. Brian  December 6, 2010 at 5:20 pm

    It’s good to hear Wayne Madsen is speaking up.

    BTW, Gordon the next time you have an email conversation with Paul Craig Roberts please ask him why he never mentions the Mossad 911 connections. He doesn’t have to accuse the Mossad he just has to mention all the connections and suggest that Israel has some explaining to do. He continually criticizes Israel yet avoids connecting Israel to the 911 attacks. I exchanged emails with Roberts on the 911 Mossad subject a few years ago.

    I’m still waiting for anyone to show me information that George Bush was involved in masterminding the 911 attacks. I don’t think he was involved.

    If the Mossad becomes the #1 suspect throughout the world for the 911 attacks the Mossad may be motivated to create some phony evidence connecting Bush to 911. Perhaps Rita Katz will authenticate a video of a gleeful George Bush and his wife planting explosives in the twin towers while snacking on custom made cheese puffs and listening to a collection of Puccini arias.

  78. fixtheticket  December 6, 2010 at 5:14 pm



  79. Cloak and Dagger  December 6, 2010 at 4:58 pm

    I have to hand it to you, Gordon. You nailed this almost 1 week ago. I have been sifting through the pile of documents for several days now with increasing doubts about what I was going to find. Needless to say, after all these days, I have only managed to sift through a fraction of the material, and so far I have found little of value. I think that you are spot on in your assessment.

    On a related note jumping off your comment about 9/11, I remember early morning on 9/11 here in California, I had the TV on while I was shaving and saw the reports of the planes crashing into the WTC. Being a private pilot myself, I listened with incredulity about these novice pilots who performed Top Gun maneuvers at incredible speeds using commercial airplanes to precisely hit two towers. I have been flying for 20 years, and I couldn’t have done it. Later, I heard about the crash into the pentagon – another feat that I would not have been able to perform – I could go into the details of ground effect and what it does to drag and speed – but I won’t bore you with the technical details. Suffice it to say that it is very hard to fly a plane close to the ground over a certain speed. For a handful of cave dwellers who weren’t able to pass muster at a flying school using a single engine plane and then climb into a sophisticated jetliner and fly it better than a combat ace is beyond belief.

    Yeah we have been had, and continue to be had.

  80. Dan  December 6, 2010 at 4:48 pm

    Very interesting point, RP. If WikiLeaks takes down what’s assumed to be the Bank of America, it may be a warning that they’ll bring down the entire house of cards if America doesn’t play ball.

  81. OS  December 6, 2010 at 4:31 pm

    Gordon, have someone delete the first comment. It’s a duplicate.

  82. Budreaux  December 6, 2010 at 4:30 pm

    Another good one Gordon, thanks again!

    I have a question for you G, or anyone else who might know the history: Why is the first glyph down from the hilt that is etched on both sides of a USMC ceremonial sword a star of david? Do you know when and how this came to be?

  83. OS  December 6, 2010 at 4:29 pm

    Don’t think this is the Banking Industry, just an interest in email.

  84. george beres  December 6, 2010 at 4:29 pm

    GORDON: As a native of Detroit, get off your duff and find out why the Wayne State award in the name of Helen Thomas has been dropped. What is going on? Seems to me this was instigated by Zionist groups and/or Israeli sympathizers. I have seen it happen at my University of Oregon, to John Mearsheimer (with whom I spoke) and Bishop Tutu (both of whom spoke in Oregon). This is part of a growing pattern of Israeli intimidation, and increasing control by Zionists of the U.S. legislature and presidency. I’ve done some significant research in the area, and would value sharing some of it with you. – George Beres in Eugene, Ore.

  85. johng  December 6, 2010 at 4:22 pm

    What a controlled AIPAC propoganda machine this has been from the start. It’s no secret that Israel has been suffering from a poor and sad self image in light of their recent atrocities in Gaza as well as illegal settlements along with the usual hits on effective Arab leaders by the Mossad. What a better way out of this than to use their favorite stooge and whipping boy America to somehow make Israel an innocent powerless victim once again. The only reason why Blitzer and others in Washington want prosecution of the leakers is that it would give “Israeli leaks” legitamacy.

  86. Gordon Duff  December 6, 2010 at 4:13 pm

    I spent years active in banking in China.

  87. OS  December 6, 2010 at 4:09 pm

    Nice article Gordon,

    You articles and comment section must be getting global attention, the person in link below invited me to be his friend on Facebook. ….What’s wrong with this picture, must have enjoyed some of my comments. (安研)

    Maybe you should connect with him?

  88. OS  December 6, 2010 at 4:08 pm

    Nice article Gordon,

    You comment section must be getting global attention, the person in link below invited me to be his friend on Facebook. ….What’s wrong with this picture, must have enjoyed some of my comments. (安研)

    Maybe you should connect with him?

  89. Craig Pepe  December 6, 2010 at 3:48 pm

    We are still waiting for a Wikileak on Israel’s friend, Chalabi, the wanted criminal America made Prime Minister of Iraq, a decision that led to a full scale civil war


  90. Gordon Duff  December 6, 2010 at 3:34 pm

    Zbig would never risk being wrong.
    Think about it.

  91. David Martin  December 6, 2010 at 3:31 pm

    O that the 2004 “leak” of the official investigation of the suspicious violent death of America’s first secretary of defense after 55 years of concealment would have received such publicity! See http://dcdave.com/article4/040927.html and http://www.dcdave.com/article5/080113.htm.

  92. Ross  December 6, 2010 at 3:29 pm

    So why is Zbig revealing Wikileaks as a false flag info source? I thought he was part of the scam.Are they anticipating wider public knowledge of 911 and thus want to set Bush Cheney etc as the chief patsies or as Gordon suggests,slant the debate towards blaming Iran/Pakistan and get their war.

    So the plan it seems is to gain credibility by revealing some truths and eventually spike the mixture with lies.

  93. Ron Paul 2012  December 6, 2010 at 2:51 pm

    If Assange realeases the so called “Doomsday” report about a failed American bank, all one has to do is follow the money and see who shorted the stock and made a killing.

    I have an inkling who the perps might be.

  94. Rehmat  December 6, 2010 at 2:51 pm

    the authors of the Wikileaks were not after making some sense but to isolate the US further from the world community, create more hatred among Muslim nation-states – making it easy for the Zionist entity to control the US and further weaken Israel’s neighboring countries.

    Wikileaks have fooled many world leaders with the exception of some, such as Iranian President Dr. Ahmadinejad, who dismissed the documents as “worthless mischief” which would not affect Tehran’s relations with its Arab neighbours, exposed as having pressed for a US military strike against its nuclear sites….


You must be logged in to post a comment Login

From Veterans Today Network