Zahir Ebrahim: WOW – Israel Shamir Works for Wikileaks!

WOW: Israel Shamir Works for Wikileaks – And He Did Not Tell Us About This When He Called Us ‘Denier’!

By Zahir Ebrahim | Project

My response to the unexpected confirmation that ASSANGE & SHAMIR – DISINFORMATION AGENTS?, is reproduced below. This case once again underscores the fact that the beleaguered public, wildly searching for leaders and guidance among the alternate media and the various dissent-chiefs who dominate it, simply cannot trust anyone to be who they claim they are just because they play dissent. See my report Manufacturing Dissent. As also my recent discovery concerning the famous rebel-author on banking reform, Ellen Brown, J.D.!

The photograph of Israel Shamir with Julian Assange lifts the fog on Israel Shamir's bizarre support of Wikileaks! But why did Israel Shamir not disclose his close association with Julian Assange when he called Zahir Ebrahim a 'denier'? (Image via aangirfan via the Swedish

While dissent-chief extraordinaire, recovering former Israeli Military Occupation Forces Russian-Jewish soldier for Zion, turned Swedish-Christian pacifist-soldier for Jesus, a favorite of many beleaguered Muslims, speaker to many an audience worldwide, Israel Shamir’s bizarredom is cogently explained by this new revelation of his association with Julian Assange, Ellen Brown’s bizarre statements: Of course the oligarchy is the problem, but that doesn’t mean we can’t steer the Fed. Bernanke drives a Ford Falcon. I think he’s one of us!”, and “the U.S. is the last holdout, and the Fed is what’s holding us out. Bernanke is standing up to the Gnomes of Zurich and Basel”, still remain inexplicable. Are these two secretly friends too?

This explains much to me. Thanks [to blogger writing under the nom de plume aangirfan] for discovering the references that Israel Shamir actually works for Wikileaks!

I was initially very surprised when Israel Shamir, with whom I had corresponded a few times over the years, mentioned my name in one of his articles along with others, and wrote:

‘Theirs are familiar and respected names of the free web: F. William Engdahl, Gordon Duff, Zahir Ebrahim.’

‘They are not to be accused of collaboration with Pentagon and the CIA.’

And then he went on to strangely label me a “denier”:

‘A second denier, young Pakistani intellectual cum American Ivy League graduate Zahir Ebrahim, writes: “The core-lies retained in the Wikileaks’ disclosure is to once again reaffirm that there is a real nemesis called “Osama Bin Laden”, that the “war on terror” is real, that it is being inflicted upon the West from the Pakistan-Iran nexus, in order to re-substantiate the handoff of former President George W. Bush’s clairvoyance to the Obama Administration that “If another September 11 style attack is being planned, it probably is being plotted in Pakistan, and not Afghanistan”!

Zahir makes the same mistake. The files are the reports of what US officials believe or claim to believe. I’d ask Zahir: if you were to get hold of all reports sent from and to Afghanistan, would you censor them to remove ideas and names that are not to your liking? Remember, these are not files from God Almighty, this is the kind of stuff that spooks and soldiers write, and it naturally reflects their view of the world. So it is not “core-lies”, but “core-truth”: US officials express under the stamp of “top secret” the very same views they openly espouse.’

I couldn’t believe this load of crap – he first published it in the article titled “Wikileaks: The Real Stuff” (subsequently also published under other titles I believe), and then forwarded it to me and others mentioned for comment without disclosing that he actually worked for Wikileaks (!!)

While I had him pegged as a disinfo artist immediately, I couldn’t really grasp his motivation.

Why would a stellar dissent-chief coasting on his reputation with a loyal following of sycophant (like all other dissent-chiefs) be so stupid as to believe any of that Wikileaks business when it was all so transparent, and he was supposedly a very learned person with command of this and that, and all that? But Chomsky and Ellsberg believed it too – and I already knew them to be controlled dissent. So, since a man is known by the mantras he echoes, was Israel Shamir too one of them? How did that transpire – for it wasn’t at all obvious from what little I knew of his background. I had in fact met him at Stanford University many years ago when he came there to give a talk, and I had come away rather impressed by the metanoia of this fellow, even mentioning his metanoia in one of my essays.

The fog is lifted here, just by looking at the photograph above!

Zahir Ebrahim | Project

January 19, 2011 Comment for:

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on January 22, 2011, With Reads Filed under Government. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

11 Responses to "Zahir Ebrahim: WOW – Israel Shamir Works for Wikileaks!"

  1. AS  January 24, 2011 at 5:58 am

    Dr Nur

    ‘where you will see my pictures about my astronomical verifications that ancient Juddah was located bet Yemen and Saudia by the tribes of “bin Yamin” or “sons of Yemen” which was a caravans pirates kingdom’

    I could not find the astronomical verifications ?

    • Dr.Nur  January 24, 2011 at 11:49 am

      Mr. A.S:Astronomical meaning the sun dial experiment (the sun being one of the stars) in the summer solstice in the tropic area as predicted by prophet Isaiah 3000 years at Jerusalem which can only be located in tropic area. For english and go to

  2. Dr.Nur  January 23, 2011 at 10:38 am

    Dear Zaher Ebrahim:the more I read you the more I like you. You are using your brain for deep and useful research. Defeating the zionist plague ruining mankind and its dignity is the greatest mission one can have in these dark ages indeed. I have to your and I wanted to share materials with you but can find the email there. Try to visit our historical blog based on our revolutionary discoveries on the ground about the Abrahamic religions and the genesis of the zionist fraud at also at where you will see my pictures about my astronomical verifications that ancient Juddah was located bet Yemen and Saudia by the tribes of “bin Yamin” or “sons of Yemen” which was a caravans pirates kingdom. (Israel name is of secondary importance as zionism is the creation of the priests of Juddah). Israel and Jerusalem in Palestine are a modern zionist fraud put in the mind of european “crusaders”as a “trojan”hallucination thru their -300 B.C Thorah greek translation fraud known today as old testament. The Koran is correct to say that “the jews had holy books from their prophets but they frauded them by their hands for worldly gains…” . Also together with yours is highly recommended for sharp info.

  3. Lila Rajiva  January 22, 2011 at 11:43 pm

    Zahir –

    As I understand her, Ms. Brown has never had a problem with money printing per se, as long as it doesn’t incur debt.

    As long as the Fed prints money which puts the recipients into debt to the banking oligarchy, she is opposed to the Fed.But if it issues “debt-free” money, then she has no problem with the Fed.

    This is my understanding of her apparent about-face.

    Of course, the reasoning is astoundingly wrong, from an economic point of view.

    But by her own lights, she is actually consistent.

    Apparently, she thinks that by issuing debt-free (interest=free) money, Bernanke puts himself on the side the people….and against the loan sharks of Basel.

  4. Penumbra  January 22, 2011 at 10:53 pm

    Never been much of a follower of Shamir’s writing. I’ve read perhaps two or three items in my years of alternate-media research. Thus it doesn’t surprise me that he’s been caught out as another disingenuous gatekeeper in the image of Chomsky or Cockburn, KOS or Ariana Huffing-Puffington.

    However, I’d like to know more about the aspects you’ve found to denounce Ellsberg as one of the controlled-opposition brood. Some post-read fact checking only turned up one item which seems to question his integrity and even that is done in a veiled manner. The suggestion being that the “release” of the Pentagon Papers was actually intended to divert attention from ongoing CIA drug smuggling/dissemination operations.


    After Ellsberg leaked The Pentagon Papers, the CIA’s plot to cover-up its unilateral drug smuggling operation moved forward with greater gusto. According to the Justice Department’s still classified DeFeo Report, Conein in the spring of 1971 was called out of retirement by CIA officer E. Howard Huntand asked to become an advisor to President Nixon’s “drug czar” (and Plumber) Egil Krogh, on matters regarding “problems of narcotic control in Southeast Asia and the Pentagon Papers.”

    Consider that in 1971 the relationship between the French intelligence service and Corsican drug smugglers in its employ was exposed after a series of spectacular drug busts made in America with the assistance of the CIA. Concurrently, Conein was called out of retirement and immediately, in June 1971, told McCoy about the “truce” with the French-connected Corsicans, one of who put a gun to Ellsberg head.

    Consider also that Egil Krogh’s investigators stumbled upon the CIA’s unilateral drug smuggling operation at this time, and that in July 1971, President Nixon declared the burgeoning war on drugs to be a matter of national security. Nixon went after the CIA and quick as a flash, E. Howard Hunt (Conein’s comrade from OSS Detachment 202) bungled the bugging of the Watergate Hotel. Washington Post reporter and former Naval Intelligence officer Bob Woodward, then assigned to cover Nixon’s war on drugs, was approached by the still anonymous Deep Throat, and based on unsubstantiated rumors, incrementally engendered the Watergate scandal and effectively neutralized Nixon, and his war on drugs.

    In the summer of 1972 came the publication of McCoy’s book, which implicated the CIA in Corsican drug smuggling operation in Thailand, Vietnam, Burma and Laos. But no CIA officer was ever indicted for drug smuggling. In fact, the CIA boasted that it was actually helping, by infiltrating the Corsican operation, to wage the war on drugs. Amazing as it may sound, McCoy’s exposure in 1972 of the French Connection drug smuggling operation also helped to divert public attention from the CIA’s unilateral drug smuggling operations.

    [End excerpt]

    What puzzles me is that should Ellsberg in fact be another in a roster of controlled-dissent agents, what should be made of his announced involvement in the Sibel Edmonds case and what, most importantly, does Sibel make of his involvement?

    Would not such involvement be detrimental to her cause in the long run, should such allegations against Ellsberg prove to be true?

    • Penumbra  January 23, 2011 at 6:00 pm

      hmm, appears I won’t be getting an answer to my questions. How unfortunate.

  5. Peter Wakefield Sault  January 22, 2011 at 9:58 pm

    There are several more similar surprises awaiting you which I can’t name here because even the 9/11 truth movement has its thought police and I’m already in deep trouble with those guys so you’re going to have to identify the moles for yourself.

    • AS  January 23, 2011 at 12:48 pm

      lol Zahir well spotted… did not notice this ! Apparently I missed the train 🙂

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

From Veterans Today Network