Dimitri Khalezov on 9-11

Veterans Today Staff Writer Dimitri Khalezov Talks on 9/11 and the Mysterious Death of Nick Rowe

By J B Campbell STAFF WRITER

You may not remember Nick Rowe. His 1971 book, Five Years to Freedom, told the story of his being captured by Viet Cong after a hellacious gunfight in October, 1963 and his five years as a POW, followed by his escape just before being executed. The Vietnamese Communists had just learned that he had deceived them for five years and kept from them the fact that he was in Special Forces, rather than in the engineers.


YouTube - Veterans Today -

American students had passed on to the Viet Cong Central Committee their research on Nick. Hiding his true identity and the loss of face to the Reds resulted in a death sentence. He was being marched to the place of execution when a B-52 air raid scattered the firing squad and Nick whacked the one remaining guard with a limb and a circling Huey picked him up.

Dimitri Khalezov explains about the nuclear-tipped "Granit" missile with 500 kiloton warhead used in the Pentagon attack.

I met Nick when he came to Monterey in ’87 to take a crash course in Tagalog at the Defense Language Institute. A mutual friend asked me to help him find a place to stay. Then he was off to a new job in Manila as the chief of the anti-terror unit of the Military Advisory Group. The Filipino Communists and the Vietnamese Communists very much wanted him assassinated, the latter just for old times’ sake. And he was, but not by them.


YouTube - Veterans Today -

On April 21, 1989 Nick was in an unprotected car supplied to him by the US Embassy in Manila. Bullet resistant cars for guys on the known assassination list were taken out of the budget. A car pulled up next to Nick’s car and opened fire with an M-16 and a .45. He was hit in the head and elsewhere and died instantly.

Willis Carto told me shortly after Nick was shot that the infamous Mossad agent, Mike Harari, had organized the assassination.

I have been fortunate to be in contact with Dimitri Khalezov, whose blockbuster revelations about 9-11 are about to change our perception of reality for the better just as profoundly as 9-11 changed them for the worse. He has revealed from first-hand knowledge that Mike Harari organized the 9-11 massacre. First-hand means in this case, Mike Harari told him.

The world first heard about Mike Harari during the US invasion of Panama in 1989. He was known in Panama as Mr. 60%, because that’s how much he took from any business deal done between Israel and Panama. He and Noriega split the take. The US invasion of Panama began at 0100 on December 20. Harari and a couple of Israeli colleagues had been warned hours earlier to get out but were caught at the airport by the 82nd Airborne. Here was the chief advisor to Manuel Noriega in drug smuggling and arms smuggling, the very crimes for which Liberace-Bush ordered the invasion. Once the paratroopers figured out who they had, they put him on the plane for Tel Aviv.

Dimitri Khalezov says that Harari told him in Bangkok that he had organized the 9-11 massacre. I mentioned Nick Rowe to Dimitri and he immediately confirmed that Harari had admitted this to him also. Harari said that he’d had to depart Manila for Bangkok because of an American colonel he’d assassinated there. Dimitri investigated and found that the colonel was James Nicholas Rowe. Harari’s actual assassin had been careless and had left clues that would tie him to the Israeli. So this shows that Dimitri truly had a confidential relationship with Mike Harari, who he says is an Israeli national hero smaller in stature only to Ben-Gurion or Golda Meir. His revelations about Harari must be taken very seriously, just as his explanations of the nuclear demolition of the three WTC buildings and the Granit missile attack on the Pentagon must be taken seriously. All in all, Dimitri Khalezov has solved the (so far) crime of the 21st Century.

Dimitri will be a guest on Kevin Barrett’s Truth Jihad radio show on Thursday February 10, 9-10AM, the first of no doubt many interviews to come.

Dimitri’s video series on the nuclear demolitions and the missile attack have been heavily suppressed by YouTube and Google over the past year, but are now quite available from various on-line sources. His latest interview is here.

His explanation is devastating in its simplicity. The conversion of three steel-built skyscrapers to fine powder is only possible with nuclear explosions underneath them. Thermite, nano-thermite and thermate may well have been used by the killers to cut beams and girders but they would not have turned concrete to powder, or steel for that matter. For those not familiar with his basic position, gained from his professional experience as a Soviet nuclear security officer, a joint US/USSR treaty called the Peaceful Use of Nuclear Explosions allowed the use of nukes for the demolition of tall buildings, specifically the WTC and Sears Tower in Chicago (which is now reportedly owned by Lucky Larry Silverstein). The New York Port Authority insisted that the architects provide a means for demolition of the buildings when their useful lives inevitably ended. The famous Maryland firm of Controlled Demolition, Inc – the Loizeaux family – came up with the nuclear demolition plan after the WTC architects could offer no other way to bring down their massively-built towers. Dimitri points out that this was a theoretical plan, made to satisfy the Port Authority that the buildings could be demolished. But the plan was there from the beginning. And it was Controlled Demolition, Inc that was put in charge of removing the debris of the 9-11 attack.

The twelve-foot round holes punched through six steel-reinforced structural walls of the three rings of the Pentagon could only have been produced by the seven-ton steel Granit (“Shipwreck”) naval cruise missile, which is designed to strike aircraft carriers right at the waterline. Hence, the very low entry point on the outer wall that left no damage to the lawn.

Dimitri has also been pressed into service to Viktor Bout, a fellow Russian who was lured into Bangkok by the Americans to be framed for supplying the stolen Granit missile, stolen from the sunken submarine Kursk. Dimitri says that the Granit that hit the Pentagon was carrying a disconnected 500 kiloton warhead that would have flattened Washington DC. The yield by comparison of our Hiroshima uranium bomb was estimated at 15 kilotons, or 15,000 tons of TNT. And our Nagasaki plutonium bomb’s yield was estimated at 21 kilotons. So, we can now grasp how easily our national capital could have been moved to Denver, as some say is the plan after the destruction of Washington DC.

The reader should become familiar with Dimitri Khalezov and his great contributions to our understanding what the hell happened on September 11, 2001.



The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on February 8, 2011, With Reads Filed under Veterans. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

154 Responses to "Dimitri Khalezov on 9-11"

  1. Joshua Fielden  March 31, 2011 at 10:40 am

    More on this fakery on http://www.drjudywood.com.
    The whols site is worth spending time on to study her research.

  2. Joshua Fielden  March 31, 2011 at 10:35 am

    There is a picture of an excavator moving “Molten steel”. (1.40 minutes into the 1st Vid)
    1. That picture is fake. The orange color is what is fake. The picture was touched up with orange to make it look like there was molten steel. Unfortunately for the faker he didn’t know anything about hydraulic systems !
    2. The hydraulic system on the excavator would fail in less than a minute. YOU CANNOT USE AN EXCAVATOR TO MOVE MOLTEN STEEL.

  3. DR.NUR  March 12, 2011 at 5:22 pm

    Beslan School Massacre ..a Mistaravim black op
    3 posts – 2 authors – Last post: 25 May
    http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t152958/

    Zionists Nuke The Australian Embassy in Indonesia
    – [ Translate this page ]
    File Format: Microsoft Word – View as HTML
    Ketika mikro-nuklir meledak di Kedutaan Besar Australia Jakarta,
    ledakan bertekanan tinggi menghancurkan semua kaca jendela berlapisan
    tebal dan kuat pada …
    d.yimg.com/kq/groups/1016492/…/name/Zionis+Meledakkan+C-4.doc

    2002 Bali bomb and 2004 Jakarta were ‘ Micro Nukes ‘

    The attack

    At 10.30 a.m. local time on Thursday September 9, a miniature fireball
    formed in the sewers ten feet below the street outside the Australian
    Embassy in Jakarta, Indonesia. As the weapon went critical with an
    ultrasonic screech and the fireball reached half the temperature of
    the sun, a huge chunk of atomized roadbed was blown out at nearly one
    million feet per second, shaking the ground up to one mile away, and
    causing hearing impairment at ranges out to five miles.
    Originally Posted by Mark Twain
    At 10.30 a.m. local time on Thursday September 9, a miniature fireball
    formed in the sewers ten feet below the street outside the Australian
    Embassy in Jakarta, Indonesia. As the weapon went critical with an
    ultrasonic screech and the fireball reached half the temperature of
    the sun, a huge chunk of atomized roadbed was blown out at nearly one
    million feet per second, shaking the ground up to one mile away, and
    causing hearing impairment at ranges out to five miles.

    http:[email protected]/msg115464.html

    Beslan Psyop and Jakarta Nuke Reports

    As with the Beslan report above, my analysis of the micro nuke outside
    the Australian Embassy in Jakarta, Indonesia, has been delayed by the

    earthhopenetwork.net/forum/showthread.php?tid=3851 – Cached
    Get more discussion results
    #
    Micro Nukes (WMD) in the WTC – 911 Inside/Outside Job | Wake Up …
    26 Mar 2008 … Another Vialls’ article dealing with the supposed
    vehicle bombing of the Australian embassy in Jakarta, “Zionists Nuke
    the Australian …
    wakeupfromyourslumber.com/node/6209 – Cached

    http://www.forumpakistan.com/marriott-bombmossad-pulls-off-another-false-flag-operation-t15930.html

  4. Dr.Nur  February 27, 2011 at 5:42 am

    Exactly the syndrome of death by “strange weapon”: soft-pulverized-bones-blood-dripping-at-mouth were seen in the civilian genocide of Fallujah and Gaza and the battles of Baghdad and Kabul where micronukes/neutron bombs were used by the sisters-mothers of international talmudic narcopetrol terrorism … Another testimony to their war crimes files.

  5. Anonymous  February 26, 2011 at 9:02 pm

    Dr. Nur: You do not get a REAL EDUCATION anymore while attending the educational centers of this world. The smartest people on this planet are self-educated. The more “educated” you are from mainstream sources, the more likely that you are deceived. You might be able to parrot lies taught to you by fools, but that does not make you intelligent, only “educated” (i.e., dumb).

  6. Stratus Blue  February 25, 2011 at 11:16 pm

    Nice moderation of comments Mr. Campbell. In 1984, while Dimitri was detecting nuclear tests as a career, and with his co-workers discussing the nuclear demolition plans at Sears Tower & WTC, I was a Radiation Protection Tech at Three Mile Island. As a result of that nuclear plant’s catastrophic failure a need for Rad Techs in the USA sky rocketed which I helped fill. 5 years after the accident, while I worked there, the “recovery effort” focused on establishing tunnel routes for robots to go where no human could go. My co-workers were a cross section of USA Army Nuclear Test veterans and Rickover’s swabbies from HIS nuclear navy. Just as Dimitri was aware of Operation Plowshares and its application, I learned of the phenomena whereby pulverization of rigid material could be achieved without obliteration of surrounding less rigid material. The example I was enlightened by involved pigs. At certain distance from ground zero, shielded from the direct effects, the bones of the pigs were pulverized and yet contained within their flesh. This was tested and retested. On 9-11 we witnessed the application of what was learned from that testing but kept secret from 99% of humanity. The curve of binding energy is only a starting point for study. If you cannot explain what holds matter in place, you will not comprehend what tore the WTC apart.

  7. DR.NUR  February 25, 2011 at 8:37 am

    FOR CONFIRMATION OF PREPLANNED DEMOLITION PLANS AT THE BUILDING TIME OF WTC,HERE IT IS!! AND KHALEZOV IS RIGHT AND I FOUND THIS MYSELF. HE WAS STILL A TEEN AT THE TIME AND SO WAS I. SO HE DID NOT MAKE IT UP. PLEASE READ THIS CAREFULLY HERE AND THOSE WHO ARE TOO LAZY TO READ SWITCH TO HARD LIQUOR THANKS.. AND THOSE WHO KEEP DENYING WE WILL KNOW WHO ARE THE HEAVY DRINKERS!: http://Www.just-another-inside-job.blogspot.com/2007/04/building-wtc-to-detonate-it.html
    and http://www.factsnotfairies.blogspot.com

  8. Edward Rynearson  February 21, 2011 at 1:28 pm

    February 17, 2011 – Kevin Barrett Show
    Kevin Barrett speaks with intelligence community whistleblower Dmitri Khalezov and Veterans Today editor Gordon Duff. They discuss whether an infamous Mossad agent named Mike Harari brag of organizing 9/11? Dmitri Khalezov, author of The Third Truth About 9/11, was arrested in Thailand along with Mike Harari. Khalezov says Harari was his friend at the time of 9/11, invited him to a party on 9/12/01 celebrating the successful operation, and subsequently let it be known, in so many words, that he, Harari, was an organizer of the 9/11 false-flag event. Gordon Duff, editor of Veterans Today, knows the intelligence community well and says Khalezov should be taken seriously as a potential witness in the 9/11 mass murder case.
    http://eddieleaks.org/barrett-khalezov-duff/

  9. Mike  February 20, 2011 at 5:04 pm

    Wrong Hnrey B…he is a jew, and they stick together NO MATTER WHAT. The Sayanim network is how they have so much support, they are ALL SAYANIM.

    They laugh at people’s stupidity for not figuring it out. They have changed their “name” a thousand times from illuminati to communist to jesuits to neocons and Zionists. The fact is they are all jews, and have some non-jews they put up as front men/women.

    There are no good jews. As a rule I can count on ONE HAND how many so called good jews have ever come out and said the truth, and they are all dead.

    They play head games with people using psychological warfare, and until a large % of the “truth movement” understands this, they will keep you all trapped in a corner fumbling in the dark.

    Code Pink, We are change, Democracy now….the list is nearly endless…..are all jew ran websites that use bait and switch and clever propaganda to keep you thinking a certain way, and make you think not all jews are on the same team. Just like liberal vs republican, fox vs CBS etc.

    Maher had democracy now or we are change burst onto his set during an interview….it’s all fake, a show!…..a setup!

    Learn their playbook, study them, and you will see what I mean. Give them a free pass…….and you will also see what I mean!

    No organization or movement can survive if they are let in the door.

    Check out http://www.subvertednation.net

  10. DR.NUR  February 17, 2011 at 5:33 pm

    http://www.ghosttroop.net link for survivor of american nukes in Baghdad

  11. J.F.E.  February 14, 2011 at 2:38 pm

    Bruce, thank you for conveying my statements & questions to Mr. Khalezov and then placing Dimitri’s responses in the thread. Dimitri, thank you for responding. I appreciate your taking the time & effort to answer my questions.

    Hopefully, Veterans Today readers will see more from Dimitri Khalezov, when his experience, training, and former service in the Soviet Union’s military can shed light on a given situation — or any other post service experiences that can shed light on a given situation.

    Thanks, again.

  12. DR.NUR  February 13, 2011 at 5:03 pm

    YES! ANYBODY WORRIED ABOUT IRAN HURTING ISRAEL OR AMERICA,WHICH IT CANNOT DO EVEN IF IT WANTED TO, IS PUSHING THE ZIOCON PROPAGANDA LINE. THEY TRIED TO TALK ABOUT AN INEXISTENT NUCLEAR PRODRAM WITHOUT SUCCESS WHILE THEY ARE THE ONES NUKING EVERYBODY FOR CASPIAN AREA NARCOS AND PETROL,SO NOW THEY INVENT SCARY STORIES ABOUT “SUPERSONIC” MISSILES (is there any missile that is not supersonic by the way?)AND THEY FIND PSEUDO SCIENTISTS TO SPONTANEOUSLY PARROT THEEIR LINE..? HUMMM…STRANGE INDEED MY DEAR WATSON…! YES YOU RIGHT MR.HOLMES!..

  13. Tom Mysiewicz  February 13, 2011 at 4:05 pm

    The nano-thermite, which I’m sure is present, only accounts for the softening/cutting of steel structural elements. It does NOT account for the huge amount of dust under 10 microns–detected by organizations such as USGS–characteristic of demolitions. Nor does it account for the simultaneous pulverization of 500,000 fluorescent lighting fixtures, releasing substantial amounts of mercury into the environment. Nor does it account for the fact that we have a 50-foot debris pile rather than a 50-story-high MOUNTAIN of debris with collapsed ceilings and office furniture. Sorry, but a lot of that mass simply disappeared into the dust that covered lower Manhattan. Why was it so important to get rid of the WTC steel QUICKLY? Could it be because nuclear detonations changed the isotope ratio in the steel? From my days covering industrial radiation processing, I recall that all iron of terrestrial origin has a set ratio of Fe isotopes with very long half lives–Fe-56, Fe-57, Fe-59 and Fe-60. (Meteorites and steel from nuclear blasts and space has a different ratio.) Only nuclear demolition could have accomplished what was done–the placement of tens of thousands of high-explosive charges would have been impossible.

  14. J. Bruce Campbell  February 13, 2011 at 2:18 pm

    J.F.E. says:

    uary 12, 2011 at 6:23 pm (Edit)

    To Bruce and/or Dimitri:

    I appreciate the statements, answers, and followup. I hope this process continues because Mr. Khalezov has valuble information regarding his contacts with Mossad and senior Mossad agent Mike Harari.

    I do have a question for Dimitri (I apologize if this is in Dimitri’s book or video):

    How do you arrive at the 150 kiloton figure?

    ————————————- I remembered this digit was discussed in my former organization – the Special Control Service. Besides, this digits corresponds to all visible effects (the cavity size and the earthquake intensity feeling), it also corresponds to the duration of time during which the hot matters remained hot at ground zero (as bigger is the yield as longer it will retain hot temperatures), and it also corresponded to logic – the 150 kiloton was the limit set by the Peaceful Nuclear Explosions Treaty, so they apparently used the very maximum of what was allowed by it, and, still, it was not enough to pulverize the entire Twin Towers, as you can see. They should use perhaps 200 kilotons, but they were allowed the maximum of 150. Hence my claims.

    Also, perhaps, Dimitri has reviewed this thread and read DR.NUR’s comments relating credible evidence about Israeli government, Mossad, use of micro-nukes. How much knowledge does Mr. Khalezov have about these micro-nukes?

    ————————————— I have some knowledge as a former officer of the organization dealing with nuclear weapons. Besides I just see the effects of these “car-bombings” with my very eyes (such as hundreds of tons of TNT yields, sizes of craters, “ground zero” definitions of the places of “car-bombings”, mushroom clouds, radiation sickness of people around, etc.), plus I had a several discussions with acting intelligence officers on this topic. All of it is more than enough to have an opinion.

    I guess the basis for my questions is this: Is it possible that Mr. Khalezov is correct about WTC being a nuclear demolition (in which I agree with him based on the facts & evidence from ground zero and immediate vicinity), but is not accurate about specifics?

    —————————– may be. But even if I am wrong is some particular details, the deviation from the reality is not big. I might, for example, mistakenly believe that it was 150 kiloton while it was 120 kiloton in reality, but by no means could I mistake a 150 kiloton thermo-nuclear explosion with a laughable 1 kiloton mini-nuke’s explosion.

    Obviously, Mr. Khalezov had nothing to do with the planning, preperation, and execution of the WTC 911 nuclear demolition. Mr. Khalezov does sound like he could have been a PLAN B patsy, as in, should somehow the PLAN A 19 arab hijackers, official story go awry, and not be available, or viable with the public, then Mr. Khalezov could be a viable back-up fall guy — anything to hide the truth and maintain plausible deniability for the conspirators.

    ———————– it seems that I was earmarked to serve as a “valuable useful idiot” indeed. First of all I am an extremist by nature which could be used to convince some stupid security officials that “as an extremely dangerous person I am indeed capable of anything awful”. Secondly, as a former officer of the 12th chief directorate, who has also an extremist nature and also very free-minded (read “criminally minded”) I could be easily used to blame on me anything like “nuclear terrorism”. It would look plausible. Thirdly, I was indeed involved in the fake passports trade in the 90s together with the Mossad operatives (I am quite free-minded in this sense since as a Christian I could remember that the Lord God has forgotten to supply Adam and Eve with passports upon their emplacement Here and so I don’t see anything really criminal in dealing with these illegal papers, I mean “illegal” in the God’s eyes) and the secret services knew about this fact very well. So it could be used to claim that I was allegedly the one who supplied the 9/11 hijackers and 2002 Bali bombers with fake passports. It is not true at all, but if someone would claim so it would sound plausible. And indeed they claimed exactly that – that it was exactly me (along with one Mossad agent) who allegedly supplied Hambali and 9/11 hijackers with fake passports. This is an “intermediate” level of the “truth”, of course, since serious guys knew that there were no “hijackers”, but the mid-ranking security officials would believe that. The only mistake was in the basic presumption – to use some one as a “useful idiot” you should first make sure that you are dealing with a real “idiot’. Since I am not the one, this method will not work with me personally and it will eventually lead to disastrous results – which you could see right now when I began to explain all of this to public.

    Mr. Khalezov is candid to state he, himself, is not a nuclear physicist, but had tactical nuclear knowledge & information due to his experience and posting in the Soviet Union’s military.

    —————– yes, this is exactly the case. But even what I know about nuclear weapons is more than enough to make certain conclusions.

    The Mossad always seems to have something up their sleeve by way of deception.
    Is it possible that Mossad and the other conspirators had specific plans that Mr. Khalezov would not be aware of, and, also, be different from what Mr. Khalezov would expect based on his training & experience?

    ——————————– I don’t know. But it seems to me that the Mossad attempted (back in the 1998-2002) to make me responsible for alleged selling of mini-nukes and nuclear materials to “terrorists”. I could see that if looking back now. And indeed they did their best in this – particularly by connecting me to the 2002 Bali bombing that is known to be nuclear to any and every security official. But it did not work anyway. I don’t know what other plans they could have. Because I am not too valuable, actually. I quitted a military service a very long time ago and unlikely I could be useful in any game (except, of course, only to make a mockery of the very game, such as is the case now).

    After all, while the size & scope of the WTC destruction would be unprecedented, Mossad, apparently, had much actual practice & experience with micro-nuke field operations (successful nuclear detonations without getting caught or the method getting revealed).

    ————————- the Mossad started to use their mini-nukes in disguise of “car-bombings” (thanks to the stupidity of Reagan’s Administration who preferred not to disclose the nuclear truth to the public) from the beginning of the ‘80s (mostly against their own friends – the Americans, of course). Thus the Israelis apparently have a big experience in this field. No doubt.

    That practical experience may have led Mossad to devise unique ways & means to execute the attack and guarantee success (complete & total collapse while maintaining plausible deniability), which Mr. Dimitri Khalezov does not know about.

    ——————————- it seems that the 9/11 affair was not planned by the Mossad (which is a small organization with limited human resources and also limited intellectual capabilities), but rather by the Freemasons in collaboration with the best thinking brains from among the NWO flock. And that is why 9/11 was planned so well (relatively “well” actually – they forgot that aluminum can not penetrate steel). The Mossad could only have a smaller part of this that had to do with the execution, but not with the planning. When it comes to my personal knowledge, I indeed don’t know much about this. All I know is about the fact that the “emergency nuclear demolition scheme” of the WTC existed and this was the matter of fact + that the Mossad was interested in this + that the WTC was finally demolished + that the Mossad was in a genuine celebratory mood over this otherwise awful fact. The rest are merely my conclusions as a researcher. Certainly I don’t know and I can’t know everything.

    That is what I could say in reply.

    Sincerely yours,

    Dimitri.

  15. Bill  February 13, 2011 at 12:05 pm

    Those groups are full of government agents, or people from independent groups that are equally dubious. And, of course, what would a pilot know about how a plane would behave if it hit layers of thick steel?

    Steve Jones was a leader in destroying cold fusion, which was a threat to the military-industrial complex, the oil barons, and the hot fusion physics labs that get more than the lion’s share of US research money. He’s supposed to be an alternative?

    Finally, it does matter what the details were. Khalezov’s idea is that the minions, such as the FBI or Congress Critters, are told about mini-nukes being the reason for the War on Terror, and that these terrorists and sellers of WMDs have to be stopped at all costs. So, if you convince a Senator that mini-nukes were used, he may vote for more war.

  16. Dr.Nur  February 13, 2011 at 2:55 am

    Mr.Throb: you are a throbbing donkey. I am 99% convinced you don’t have even have a highschool diploma by the way you pretend to know about nukes. Am I wrong ?

  17. J.F.E.  February 12, 2011 at 6:23 pm

    To Bruce and/or Dimitri:

    I appreciate the statements, answers, and followup. I hope this process continues because Mr. Khalezov has valuble information regarding his contacts with Mossad and senior Mossad agent Mike Harari.

    I do have a question for Dimitri (I apologize if this is in Dimitri’s book or video):

    How do you arrive at the 150 kiloton figure?

    Also, perhaps, Dimitri has reviewed this thread and read DR.NUR’s comments relating credible evidence about Israeli government, Mossad, use of micro-nukes. How much knowledge does Mr. Khalezov have about these micro-nukes?

    I guess the basis for my questions is this: Is it possible that Mr. Khalezov is correct about WTC being a nuclear demolition (in which I agree with him based on the facts & evidence from ground zero and immediate vicinity), but is not accurate about specifics?

    Obviously, Mr. Khalezov had nothing to do with the planning, preperation, and execution of the WTC 911 nuclear demolition. Mr. Khalezov does sound like he could have been a PLAN B patsy, as in, should somehow the PLAN A 19 arab hijackers, official story go awry, and not be available, or viable with the public, then Mr. Khalezov could be a viable back-up fall guy — anything to hide the truth and maintain plausible deniability for the conspirators.

    Mr. Khalezov is candid to state he, himself, is not a nuclear physicist, but had tactical nuclear knowledge & information due to his experience and posting in the Soviet Union’s military.

    The Mossad always seems to have something up their sleeve by way of deception.

    Is it possible that Mossad and the other conspirators had specific plans that Mr. Khalezov would not be aware of, and, also, be different from what Mr. Khalezov would expect based on his training & experience?

    After all, while the size & scope of the WTC destruction would be unprecedented, Mossad, apparently, had much actual practice & experience with micro-nuke field operations (successful nuclear detonations without getting caught or the method getting revealed). That practical experience may have led Mossad to devise unique ways & means to execute the attack and guarantee success (complete & total collapse while maintaining plausible deniability), which Mr. Dimitri Khalezov does not know about.

  18. J. Bruce Campbell  February 12, 2011 at 4:41 pm

    Not 75 feet – 77 meters. It wasn’t earth, it was granite. The skeptics still have to demonstrate how solid steel columns can be turned to dust with conventional demolition materials. Never been done and can’t be done. Or how molten materials could stay molten for many weeks. Or how the leukemias and deaths of first responders could be from the effects of thermite. No one ever heard of “nano-thermite” before Stephen Jones coined the word.

    You’re also mixing the Hiroshima air blast at 1,900′ with an underground explosion in granite.

    We’ve got a witness to the nuclear demo plan for WTC and Sears. We’ve got a witness to the super-Mossadnik confessing and celebrating his exploiting the nuke demo plan. Can you impeach him with anything better than calling it “disinformation?” How would you turn high-grade steel into dust?

  19. tom  February 12, 2011 at 3:24 pm

    Very good stuff. But: 1) Geiger and radiation detectors, like plain cameras too were banned on ground zero. Dmitri spends a few pages on this curious detail. 2) Most of the radiation was contained below the rubble. 3) An epidemiological study on survivors and first responders may be a good idea.

  20. tom  February 12, 2011 at 3:01 pm

    “checktheevidence” is a lot of B/S: Dmitri offer proofs in his book that the “bathtub” was effectively damaged. Other allegations are laughable for anyone who did read the book.

  21. tom  February 12, 2011 at 2:50 pm

    If you read Khalezov’s book, you will find that he says that the demolition plan involved two tunnels to deliver the nukes under the WTCs FROM WTC7 (and that is a reason why WTC7 had to be destroyed -to cancel the evidence according Khalezov)

  22. DR.NUR  February 12, 2011 at 12:30 pm

    ANY DOUBTS?? MOSSAD’S WARNING TO DUBAI: A NUKE! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRws9eHvVgw AND http://wn.com/DUBAI_EXPLOSION AND 1983 ARMY BARRACKS BEIRUT: http://www.disclose.tv/forum/dimitri-khalezov-wtc-nuclear-demolition-full-playlist-t21675.html
    Because the 1983 Beirut
    711 × 593 – 253 ko – gif
    bibliotecapleyades.net

  23. DR.NUR  February 12, 2011 at 10:39 am

    Marriot bombing Reply with quote
    Car or truck bombs DO NOT leave craters : EVER. Only explosive
    ordnance that is buried below ground or penetrates the ground (aerial
    bomb/ missile) will do this.
    The photo of the cars is a give-away. See the attached url for Dr.
    Judy Woods website that investigates the deployment of directed energy
    weapons for reference and comparisons of WTC 9/11 and the Marriot
    aftermath, especially the cars.
    http://www.drjudywood.com/articles/DEW/StarWarsBeam5.html
    My humble opinion, as a 60-years old retired military ordnance
    specialist : this one joins a long list of similars and has all the
    classic fingerprints of a Mossad false flag op.
    Crater and shearing / delaminating of vertical frontage of hotel : a
    micro nuke, slightly larger than the unit deployed by Mossad in Bali.
    Radioactive residues : very hard to pin down to the fact only Alpha
    radiation emitted.
    A Tesla / HAARP / Hutchinson effect type Scalar / directed energy
    weapon deployed in conjunction with Israeli-Dimona micro-nuke? Very
    likely.
    Rusty al Haq
    Mon Sep 22, 2008 11:05 pm View user’s profile Send private message
    #
    Joe Vialls Passed Away Today
    – 7:52am
    Oh and pdove: “Thanks for revealing that Bali bombing is the result of
    a small neutron bomb.” Indeed, but please do the man the honour of …
    http://www.iraq-war.ru/article/57230 – Cached – Similar

  24. DR.NUR  February 12, 2011 at 10:10 am

    http://mikephilbin.blogspot.com/2010/04/daniel-estulin-dmitri-khalezov-tag-team.html
    As to nukes under the WTC (150mt nukes!!LOL), sure there were, but
    they were micro nukes..like Bali, Oklahoma, Taba, Jakarta Australian
    Embbasy and Jakarta Marriott, to mention just a few.
    http://dkhalezov.com/

    http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=109250

    In 1993, Joe Vialls exposes some facts about single explosions that
    were very similar to the 2001 WTC bombing. The article, “Micro Nukes
    in London,” notes the sudden usage of massive explosions in business
    districts by the IRA with a brief mention of the 1993 bombing of the
    WTC. In the supposed first mega-bombing by the ‘IRA’, an eyewitness
    stated, “The ground shook under our feet. There was a brilliant white
    flash and a tall vertical column of smoke.” Significant information
    about the Special Atomic Demolition Munition (SADM – the general class
    of the W54 warhead). While the government was working on the usage of
    a conventional bomb to the corporate media, there was accidental
    filming of investigators of the bombing in full radiation protective
    gear. Description of the crater created by the second explosion
    reveals a hole 60 feet wide and 40 feet deep. Quotes of physicists’
    Galen Winsor, John McPhee and Theodore Taylor are prophetic for the
    usage of micro nukes. Taylor specifically notes the future usage of an
    extremely small micro nuke being used in the WTC in the year 1973.

    Another crater 22 feet wide and 5 feet deep is noted in the article
    “Bali Micro Nuke – Lack of Radiation Confuses Experts.” Within 48
    hours the Bali government found traces of C4 explosive. Next came the
    revised explanation of explosives on top of gas containers. After that
    failed to explain noted facts, the next theory was explosives with
    napalm. The final explanation from London quoted a reliable source
    that an IRA style bomb mixture was used. Still, there were significant
    problems with the story as the IRA had detonated 1,000 pounds of the
    mixture and there was no crater produced. The US bomb, BLU-82 – used
    for clearing helicopter landing zones in the jungles of Vietnam,
    contains 6.3 Tons of high grade military explosive with an aluminum
    additive for increased heat does not create a crater. The 1/4 inch
    steel encased explosive is parachuted to its target and detonated 1 to
    2 feet above ground. Approximately 40 people close enough to be
    vaporized simply vanished without a trace. Insights on Israel’s .01 kt
    Dimona nuke are also related in this article. According to the
    information presented, the bomb uses highly enriched Plutonium 239,
    99.78% pure, and only emits alpha radiation which is invisible to most
    Geiger counters.

  25. Shallel  February 12, 2011 at 12:48 am

    Looks a termite infestation.

  26. shallel  February 12, 2011 at 12:45 am

    Khalezov says 150 KT 75+ feet underground.

  27. Shallel  February 12, 2011 at 12:43 am

    They are all fake.

  28. Shallel  February 12, 2011 at 12:42 am

    Good stuff but, “It seems the planes flew into those buildings using approach patterns that would rival the best “heavy” pilot skills available could be easily explained if we accept 1) the plains were be directed from somewhere other than their cabins, and 2) that the air defense drills were ordered to assure nothing interfered with their murderous robotic flight paths.”

    Having robotic control does dot alter the flight envelope of the aircraft.

  29. Shallel  February 12, 2011 at 12:39 am

    Hi again Andrew!

  30. Shallel  February 12, 2011 at 12:37 am

    I volunteer to be a passenger, it’s the least I can do for what’s left of my country. Besides I am so sick of this ten year lie that death would be a welcome relief.

  31. Shallel  February 12, 2011 at 12:34 am

    Any pilots here care to comment on the realities of Vmo (360 Kts) at this altitude, and the ability of a B767 traveling over 500 MPH to remain in one piece let alone be controllable by man or computer?

  32. Shallel  February 12, 2011 at 12:29 am

    Classic controlled demolition does not destroy the tops of buildings first. They use the weight of the structure to destroy the building as it hits the ground after the lower support is taken out, this allows a lot less explosive to be used and is standard procedure.

  33. Steve J.  February 12, 2011 at 12:26 am

    Actually When I first Interviewed Dimitri Khalezov, over a year ago. I was initially confused about the lack of NUCLEAR explosive force shown on the windows of the lower floors as the blast wave moved up from 100 meters underground. This puzzled me for about a week, so I returned to his 24 part video series and watched it ALL over again, and THEN after hours of pondering it struck me like a baseball between the eyes.

    8 Seconds before collapse initialisation we see a camera mounted on a neighbouring building shake inexplicably. This was the Zero point of nuke detonation.

    Watching footage of a typical nuclear blast, it does take roughly about 8-10 seconds for the mushroom cloud to reach maximum altitude. It does not take 10 seconds however for 110 floors to come down. This is actually 11 floors a second and beyond the realms of the laws of physics to be explained how it met ZERO resistance on the way down.

    The “Squibs” that we all saw (as the buildings came down, and thought were evidence of explosive charges bringing the BUILDING down,) were in fact evidence of the nuke blast wave MOVING UPWARDS (escaping at points that were not airtight) as the top of the building (Sheared off by thermite + other compounds) came Down ON TOP of the obvious mushroom like cloud, squashing it amidst particulate matter and nano-particulate material that was the building pulverised by the force of the weapon(s).

    Very effective way of disguising the blast(s) using a combination of restricted Military grade nano-thermate and other explosives to bring the steel structures down, while the nuclear shockwave pulverised and mangled everything including the floors, the walls and of course the massive core columns, moving upwards as we saw in all the footage of the collapses.

    Never before has such detail about “Demolition plans being submitted with the Construction plans” at the time of the buildings creation been forthcoming. Dimitri has provided the world this evidence NOT from his research as some mistakenly say, but by his former position in the USSR Soviet Army as a Nuclear Specialist. BY HIS JOB, he came across this evidence some 30 years ago.

    Evil men succeed when Good men say nothing. Dimitri is one very “good man” that has refused to stay silent and I honour him for for his patriotism (to humanity) in revealing the true terrorists of the 9-11 Federal Crime that has now cost over 1.5 million Iraqis lives and over 6.6 million Afghanis.
    God Bless U Dimitri, and thank Goodness there are brave people like yourself in this world.

    I can only see The Viktor Bout arrest as one political statement:

    A shot across the BOW of Dimitri.
    A way to attack him indirectly.
    Arrest his friend living near him in Thailand, this is the message the USA are sending him. Obviously not many in the US State Dept. are happy with his coming out with “solid evidence” of this criminal event.

    -Steve Johnson

  34. Shallel  February 12, 2011 at 12:24 am

    Hi Andrew!

  35. Shallel  February 12, 2011 at 12:22 am

    Bill speaks the truth! These “plane impacts” are easily disproved with high school physics, and the videos are akin to using TV footage of Superman to prove he can really fly.

    I say arrest the news networks FIRST!

  36. Dr.Nur  February 11, 2011 at 9:53 pm

    Mister Ron Paul: it just shows you have the IQ of a donkey and you may have watched the video but did not download/read Khalezov’s book nor would you have the schooling to understand the physics involved. I pray the original Ron Paul is neither you or like you.

  37. Dr.Nur  February 11, 2011 at 9:34 pm

    Rubbish my friend. He is not close to Rockefellers but did interview for Iran’s Presstv in Japan.Ben Fulford was many years Asia’s Forbes editor,he is a japanese citizen of canadian origin and was proposed the finance ministry which he declined. He has tremendous influence there. He documented the US earthquake blackmail and subsequent Haarp attacks on Japan and also on China. Your gratuitous attack shows you know nothing about him and are probably jealous to be a nobody whereas he is remarkable as he is.

  38. arthurdecco  February 11, 2011 at 8:36 pm

    Thank you for your thoughtful post.

    You reminded of a quote:
    “When you hear hoof beats, think horses not zebras.”

    In other words, the simplest explanation is usually the correct one.

  39. J. Bruce Campbell  February 11, 2011 at 4:48 pm

    Dimitri has corrected my seven points above. [My points are in brackets.]

    Hi Bruce.

    I received all your letters.

    Yes, you are right in using the word “cultivated” by the Mossad. This was exactly the case. But you know, I am not too “cultural” to be really cultivated. Many people had broken their teeth on me before and the Mossad will not be an exception to this rule. This is sure.

    Regarding the rest – please see my comments below:

    Friday, February 11, 2011, 2:04:15 AM, you wrote:

    [Hi, Dimitri –

    Spent the day reading all the deniers and attackers and your very good responses to them.] —– I will try to send you one more of such piece today. I am preparing one with answers to certain Yan Zeman – one of the recent most spiteful critics of mine. Hope to finish it soon, perhaps today.

    [I’m having the same stuff in the piece I wrote the other day so I put this in the comments:

    Dimitri has several main points that should be kept in mind.

    1. He was approached around January, 2001 by Mossad agents in Bangkok, who “befriended” him.] ————– no, the Mossad agents befriended me long before that. In 1997 I guess. In the beginning of 2001 it was Harari, but those who introduced me to him knew me long before that.

    [2. He was introduced by them to Mike Harari, who became very friendly and wanted to know from him, did the Soviet military know about the nuclear demolition plan for the WTC buildings? (answer: yes)] —————– this is correct.

    [3. On September 12, 2001 he was a guest of Harari and the other Mossadniks at a celebration of the successful attacks of the day before. Harari said happily that it was the greatest thing he had ever done.] ———————— no we were only three there – Harari, me and his son. The rest of the Mossad people are too young to be in friendly terms with Harari – it is just like captains in comparison with 4 star general. Subordination would not allow him to be so close with the rest. But with me personally it is another story – because we were friends (or at least so it seemed). When it comes to the rest of the Mossad operatives in Bangkok – they were indeed celebrating and I also saw it, but it was separately and later in the day. While Harari had a celebratory breakfast early in the morning 12 of September 2001 (about 6 AM or so Bangkok time), younger Mossad guys were celebrating it later in the day and in a different location.

    [4. The FBI had him and Harari, who used an Arabic name and French ID, arrested for extradition to the US for selling nuclear weapons to terrorists and for supplying false passports to them. Harari escaped but Dimitri did over a year in jail fighting extradition and was successful. It was during his time in jail that he decided to tell what he knew to the public, since the US authorities already knew the truth but were trying to frame him. Now they are framing Viktor Bout for the same thing, and he, too, is totally innocent.] ————————– more or less correct, but Harari did not actually “escape”. He just arranged an unprecedented trick by hiring someone to stay in prison in his stead and the Thais and the French just pretended “not to notice” this fact. When it comes to Victor – it is 100% correct.

    [5. Dimitri is simply saying that because of his highly-specialized work in the Soviet nuclear security department, the 12th Chief Directorate, he and his colleagues were aware of the decades-old nuclear demolition plan for the WTC towers and the Sears Tower in Chicago. He does not attempt to present himself as an expert in nuclear demolition able to answer myriad technical questions on every aspect of the demo job. Although mini-nukes have been used maybe a dozen times to wreck targets and slaughter people, the three WTC buildings are the only ones to his knowledge that were obliterated and turned to powder. He suspects that this will not be done again due to the catastrophic results which would be easily compared with 9-11. Mini-nukes, of course. But the WTC yields were 150 KT each.] —————— yes, this is correct. But I can’t say that am an expert in particularly “nuclear demolition” since such things were not even conceivable in the former USSR. I am not even a big specialist in nuclear weapons in general, to be honest, because I lack a special education in this field, but, still, I could say that I know about nuclear weapons more compare to just an approximate military officer, due to my specific position in service – as you can see I know the basics that allow me to explain the physics of underground nuclear explosions and nuclear weapons designs, for example (not enough knowledge to make the actual nuclear bomb, still, hope you realize this).

    [6. In 2007 he discovered the truth about the Granit naval cruise missile, which was that the 500 KT nuclear warhead was left on it as evidence to US officials that terrorists had one more in each WTC tower that if detonated would flatten NYC and this threat persuaded US officials to bring the towers down using the thermonuclear devices placed below the sub-basements. He doesn’t claim to know the motive for bringing down #7 other than to destroy evidence of the whole plot. The Granit missile in the Pentagon was necessary to bluff US officials to destroy the towers.] ————— no it was a bit earlier than that. I knew about the Granit missile from my conversations with Mike Harari in 2002-2003, though I did not suspect that the nuclear warhead was on. But I got to know about the nuclear warhead in 2005 only. And, still, only in 2007 I finally learned that the fact of the nuclear warhead was used as a prop to “convince” the US officials that other similar nukes were allegedly planted by “terrorists” in the upper floors of the Twins and were allegedly “about to explode.”

    [7. The Mossad had him as the perfect fall-guy, since the cruise missile was Soviet and “everybody knows” about all the mini-nukes for sale from the old Soviet Union. As he says, “It’s not that easy to find a former Soviet nuclear security officer.” But they did and brought the chief (Harari) in to make him part of the family. Harari wound up in Bangkok to escape justice in Manila for killing Nick Rowe.] ——————————– correct. I noticed (though belatedly) some dirty game around me with constant attempts to connect me to nuclear trade even back in the end of the 90s. But I duly appreciated all of that only after the Bali bombing of 2002 when I realized the game. I don’t think they would be able the “Granit” missile on me, it will be a bit too much. It was mini-nukes only. But when it comes to Victor Bout – yes, in his case they made him a complete “culprit” – just for everything ranging from the “Granit” missile to the “mini-nukes” and enriched Uranium of weapon-grade.

    [Dimitri, like Lee Oswald, was set up long in advance to take the fall for this monster crime that would put America in its long-planned war against Islam on behalf of Israel.] —————– looks like, at least to a certain extent.

    [If these are good, you might consider them as introductions to yourself, as they seem to me to be important points. Please correct any errors. I should have made it clearer that the WTC weapons were not mini-nukes, as far as I understand them, but rather conventional-sized devices.] ———— correct. The WTC demolition devices were by no means “mini-nukes”, but huge hydrogen charges, a size of a barrel each and with yields 150 times that of a “mini-nuke” set at its maximum yield – 1 kiloton.

    ADDITIONALLY. I strongly suggest you to download and look carefully at these photos:
    http://www.911-truth.net/911_molten_rock_on_ground_zero.zip

    I guess you will understand that it had nothing to do with “mini-nukes” (judging by the size of the cavities and by the amount of molten rock). Also you might be interested in this 1998 article:
    http://www.rossie.com/harari.htm

    If you can pass this info to those people who are about to make the today’s interview, I will greatly appreciate this, so that they could have some ideas or adjust their questions to these points.

    Sincerely yours,
    Dimitri.

  40. J.F.E.  February 11, 2011 at 3:10 pm

    People interviewed contemporaneous at the scene saw the plane hit the South tower before they ever got home to watch the T. V. news.

    But in your view all these people were lying or mistaken or subject to subliminal suggestion?

    I’d say you bought into a forum and now can’t face up to the physical evidence. The holes in the buildings? With the colums (outer wall) bent inward.

  41. J.F.E.  February 11, 2011 at 2:33 pm

    Davol says:
    February 10, 2011 at 6:43 pm
    “No wrong. It’s one explaination or the other. Choose your exteme and stick to it. I’m with the nuke theory. That’s the only thing they could have used and nothing else assisted the controlled demolition of the towers. You can’t even believe in planes hitting the towers if you endorse the nuke theory because that’s just hypocracy. There were not hijacked planes on 9/11! Gawd how can you be so stupid to think there were planes that day. Gawd! The morons I have to deal with on these comment sections.”

    Elevated levels of strontium and barium found in the WTC dust – products of nuclear reactions. China syndrome molten metal in the WTC footprints, burnt cars far away from the WTC footprints. Temperatures far exceeding anything a mechanical gravity collapse could generate.

    Nanothermite also found in WTC dust.

    The two theories are not mutually exclusive. Nuclear micro-nuke for destroying the core columns, nanothermite for cutting charges on outer perimeter columns.

    Davol, you are the most intentional disinfo agent on this post’s thread. Contemptuous sarcasm to all 911 truth is your goal.

    The reality ALL 911 truth movement supporters subscribe to:

    911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB.

  42. James  February 11, 2011 at 12:27 pm

    I read Mister Khalezov’s ebook, the short version. One thing that jumps out at me is the point about the outer lattice of steel on the twins. I’m certainly not a scientist, however, I am clear on the fact that aluminum does not penetrate steel.
    The 911 event must be revisited in it’s entirety. We can’t go on beating a dead horse, so lets bring the nag back to life.

  43. Bill  February 11, 2011 at 11:44 am

    The speed is low. It takes tungsten (Wolfram) or depleted uranium for anti-tank shells, and they have to go very much faster than 500 mph. And the towers were multi-layered with this steel.

    Why aren’t anti-tank shells made out of, say, copper or rocks, and shot at, say, a low speed of 500 mph? That would be a lot cheaper and easier than what is used.

  44. Bill  February 11, 2011 at 11:34 am

    Aluminum can’t do much to several layers of thick steel. Not even close, and not even to just one layer. Of course, cutter charges or missiles or something else might have permitted aluminum planes to go in, but this would have been a lot trickier.

  45. Bill  February 11, 2011 at 11:26 am

    You seem to be intentionally confusing everything in your posts. The 500KT nuke was on the Granit missile that hit the Pentagon. It was intentionally disabled, as the perpetrators were not actually trying to blow up the East Coast, just get certain reactions. Promoting the global slavery agenda and war being a couple. 150KT nukes were under the towers, at something like 80-100 meters.

    And the rest of your posts are also like this.

  46. BILL  February 10, 2011 at 10:51 pm

    more bad acting from ‘eye witnesses’

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GLs8Fa7biQU&feature=related

  47. abubaqar  February 10, 2011 at 8:42 pm

    reading your comments fills me with admiration knowing that there are people among you fully aware and willing to share information of the real trouble makers in the world!
    but i like to ask, what now??
    how are you going to stop this madness and the guilty party trying to start world war 3?

    how can we all take our countrys back and live in peace and security for all?

    what should we do besides endless talk to ensure fair play and human dignity for all with justice and true freedom?

    your institutions are all in the hands of the evildoers,i feel so despondent thinking how such a mighty country as america is ruled by a bunch of international mafia,s from tel aviv, how could this have happened and what time scale did it take to achieve this end?

    i wish peace for all believers in god and his messengers and may he protect you from all that is evil induced!

  48. BILL  February 10, 2011 at 8:29 pm

    Yes, All the broadcast vids are fake, the witnesses are shills here’s a classic: Gary Welz

    http://www.youtube.com/user/ghana25#p/f/7/V4yIFnq1wkU

    Here’s the short version: buildings mostly evacuated, daylight demolition, explosions, CGI cartoons on TV, media insiders as ‘witnesses’ on TV, you bought it, I didn’t, we disagree

  49. I1  February 10, 2011 at 7:10 pm

    No, they don’t. I should know. I’m King.

  50. Davol  February 10, 2011 at 6:43 pm

    No wrong. It’s one explaination or the other. Choose your exteme and stick to it. I’m with the nuke theory. That’s the only thing they could have used and nothing else assisted the controlled demolition of the towers. You can’t even believe in planes hitting the towers if you endorse the nuke theory because that’s just hypocracy. There were not hijacked planes on 9/11! Gawd how can you be so stupid to think there were planes that day. Gawd! The morons I have to deal with on these comment sections.

  51. Gordon Duff  February 10, 2011 at 6:42 pm

    throb
    what would have happened…steel would have melted…concrete would have formed a slurry and it would have stayed molten hot for 2 weeks
    or..it was kerosene…which suddenly burns with the heat of the sun
    choose

  52. J.F.E.  February 10, 2011 at 5:39 pm

    Sorry, too many videos, too many witnesses.

    Oh, by the way, do you also claim that ALL video and ALL pictures are fakes?

    The claim that there were “no planes” is not disinfo for people that already support 911 truth, for them it’s only a distraction.

    The real target is the people who haven’t investigated the evidence and still support the “official” story. They hear “no planes” and conclude that 911 truth is nuts, just like all the mainstream pundits claim.

    Shame on you BILL.

  53. Davol  February 10, 2011 at 5:31 pm

    I did a drawing back in 2002 of the 9/11 attack that included two nuclear mushroom clouds that have had me wondering ever since if there wasn’t some kind of cutting edge hydrogen or nuclear devise used to melt those buildings from the inside out. Remember the explosions in the basement before any planes hit, and the fireball that blew the main floor elevator doors off and devestated the lobby. It’s at least safe to conclude that a lot of energy brought those 3 buildings down, which is not explained by upper floor fires started by jet aircraft.

  54. J.F.E.  February 10, 2011 at 5:20 pm

    What does a plane impact have to do with a nuclear explosion?

    Nothing directly.

    But it goes directly to Khalezov’s credibility.

    I read this simonshuck’s forum and Khalezov’s statements at the forum. As poorly as Khalezov was treated, what struck me was his statement that he concluded there were “no planes” and figured that would gain his theory acceptance at simonshuck’s forum — although, all Khalezov got was ridicule.

    I’m sorry, but that kind of rational coming from Khalezov does not win my confidence.

    As I stated before, I subscribe to the micro-nuke theory, but that’s because there is a substantial amount of facts & evidence independent of Khalezov.

    150 kiloton nuke in the basement that was there from the construction of the building — that doesn’t sound realistic to my ears.

    I appreciate Veterans Today bringing forth the micro-nuke theory, but a full embrace of Khalezov seems premature.

  55. J. Bruce Campbell  February 10, 2011 at 5:10 pm

    Dimitri has several main points that should be kept in mind.

    1. He was approached around January, 2001 by Mossad agents in Bangkok, who “befriended” him.

    2. He was introduced by them to Mike Harari, who became very friendly and wanted to know from him, did the Soviet military know about the nuclear demolition plan for the WTC buildings? (answer: yes)

    3. On September 12, 2001 he was a guest of Harari and the other Mossadniks at a celebration of the successful attacks of the day before. Harari said happily that it was the greatest thing he had ever done.

    4. The FBI had him and Harari, who used an Arabic name and French ID, arrested for extradition to the US for selling nuclear weapons to terrorists and for supplying false passports to them. Harari escaped but Dimitri did over a year in jail fighting extradition and was successful. It was during his time in jail that he decided to tell what he knew to the public, since the US authorities already knew the truth but were trying to frame him. Now they are framing Viktor Bout for the same thing, and he, too, is totally innocent.

    5. Dimitri is simply saying that because of his highly-specialized work in the Soviet nuclear security department, the 12th Chief Directorate, he and his colleagues were aware of the decades-old nuclear demolition plan for the WTC towers and the Sears Tower in Chicago. He does not attempt to present himself as an expert in nuclear demolition able to answer myriad technical questions on every aspect of the demo job. Although mini-nukes have been used maybe a dozen times to wreck targets and slaughter people, the three WTC buildings are the only ones to his knowledge that were obliterated and turned to powder. He suspects that this will not be done again due to the catastrophic results which would be easily compared with 9-11. Mini-nukes, of course. But the WTC yields were 150 KT each.

    6. In 2007 he discovered the truth about the Granit naval cruise missile, which was that the 500 KT nuclear warhead was left on it as evidence to US officials that terrorists had one more in each WTC tower that if detonated would flatten NYC and this threat persuaded US officials to bring the towers down using the thermonuclear devices placed below the sub-basements. He doesn’t claim to know the motive for bringing down #7 other than to destroy evidence of the whole plot. The Granit missile in the Pentagon was necessary to bluff US officials to destroy the towers.

    7. The Mossad had him as the perfect fall-guy, since the cruise missile was Soviet and “everybody knows” about all the mini-nukes for sale from the old Soviet Union. As he says, “It’s not that easy to find a former Soviet nuclear security officer.” But they did and brought the chief (Harari) in to make him part of the family. Harari wound up in Bangkok to escape justice in Manila for killing Nick Rowe.

    Dimitri, like Lee Oswald, was set up long in advance to take the fall for this monster crime that would put America in its long-planned war against Islam on behalf of Israel.

  56. BILL  February 10, 2011 at 4:26 pm

    someone above wrote that ‘no planes’ is cia disinfo. The opposite is true. Planes and hijackers is the official version, and that was a cia psyop.

  57. Wikispooks  February 10, 2011 at 3:54 pm

    Dimitri’s original Wikipedia article on nuclear demolition from March 2010, which didn’t survive long, was tidied up (English-Language-wise) and posted on Wikispooks summer 2010. It’s a good introduction to the subject.

    Glad to hear he’s still in circulation since our email exchanges ceased abruptly around the time Victor Bout was shipped to the US

  58. Syed Zaidi  February 10, 2011 at 3:32 pm

    I wonder what Dr. Nur’s real name and identity are. His comment that Brother Nathanael Kapner thinks Christopher Bollyn is a disinformation agent is complete nonsense. Here is a link to an article by Brother Nathanael, “9/11 and the Jewish Gatekeepers,” where Bollyn is very respectfully featured as the major source:

    http://www.realjewnews.com/?p=206

  59. BILL  February 10, 2011 at 2:47 pm

    the ‘truth’ movement is a waste of time -I don’t know how the buldings came down, could be lighter fluid for all I care. But I know there were no planes, it was a media hoax, at this stage only perps and their proxies believe in planes, which means we get a lot of ziobots. Get it through you numb skull- wheather there were planes or not is generally illeveant- unless you are the PERPS, because ‘no planes’ means no arabs which leaves- Israel, CIA, CNN etc

  60. Andrew Johnson  February 10, 2011 at 1:24 pm

    Dimitri Khalezov admits that he cannot explain the evidence

    http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=288&Itemid=60

    http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=290&Itemid=60

    Keep it real – by looking at the evidence and explaining it – not by ignoring it. Conclusions should be revised when new evidence is found – they should not remain static.

  61. Andrew Johnson  February 10, 2011 at 1:24 pm

    Wow – the 4 year old Jenkins interview – which you didn’t describe the circumstaances of, so here is more information

    http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=46&Itemid=60

    See the video at the bottom of the article for an analysis of what Jenkins was up to and what he failed to achieve or the evidence he would not address or was not aware of.

    Please find any of Jenkins’ own 9/11 research outside of this video, that doesn’t try to “debunk” the evidence uncovered by Dr Wood.

    Please look at the Qui Tam case started by Dr Judy Wood:

    http://tinyurl.com/911qtam

    Finally, Dimitri Khalezov admits that he cannot explain the evidence

    http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=288&Itemid=60

    http://www.checktheevidence.co.uk/cms/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=290&Itemid=60

    Keep it real – by looking at the evidence and explaining it – not by ignoring it. Conclusions should be revised when new evidence is found – they should not remain static.

    – yet he STILL gets posted on places like Vets today… weird…

  62. rachel  February 10, 2011 at 12:43 pm

    Is Demetri a new addition to VT? if so, welcome abourd. I believe he would bring much valuable info to the world today.

  63. S. Johnson  February 10, 2011 at 10:48 am

    Well, conventionally YES>> There should be radiation.
    According to the standard beliefs about Nuclear Blasts and effects.

    However times have changed. Since the 1950’s the US government has embarked on an adventure known as Project PlowSHARE, which basically developed high yield blasts with low radioactive counts. Over 60 years of experiments and implementation of R+ D has resulted in what we see today. Minimal radioactive devices that project maximum destruction sanitization. Was there radiation counts measured at the dumpsites of the 9-11 steel?

    SURE WAS =
    http://www.nysun.com/new-york/elevated-levels-of-radium-found-in-area-of-fresh/40174/
    Elevated levels of RADIUM found at fresh kills dumpsite. Also across much of Manhattan especially the NY Israeli embassy:

    See:
    http://cleveland.indymedia.org/news/2006/10/22798.php

    and:
    http://opposingdigits.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=4074

    Much of the evidence of contamination has been swept under the carpet. ESPECIALLY concerning the DUMPED emergency vehicles. Many of which were never even scratched during 9-11 yet dumped as if they were toxically contaminated.
    http://cryptome.info/wtc-fk/wtc-fk-full.htm

  64. S. Johnson  February 10, 2011 at 10:46 am

    Adding to the last comment… Simon SHACK has been PROVEN that he is deliberate DIS-INFO. Please just ask Dimitri Khalezov for further clarification of this fact.

  65. S. Johnson  February 10, 2011 at 10:44 am

    CBS is divided over the use of false images in real broadcasts…

    Please read completely..

    http://www.nytimes.com/2000/01/13/business/cbs-is-divided-over-the-use-of-false-images-in-broadcasts.html?src=pm

    What this means basically is that anything is possible.

    Game plans just got changed.

  66. Gordon Duff  February 10, 2011 at 10:37 am

    jd
    what does a plane impact have to do with a nuclear explosion?
    and..no…the plane at 500 mph is going to do very minimal damage
    the plane is aluminum…
    we have tons of extra buildings and tons of extra planes…
    glad to test it
    could make up a list of suggested passengers
    hell..we could have a national lottery
    g

  67. JD  February 10, 2011 at 7:45 am

    I’m on board with Khalezov’s theories about nuclear detonation below the towers as a component of their controlled demolition, but his assertion that both WTC planes and their impacts were faked? I don’t believe this, there were way too many camera angles and people who witnessed the South Tower impact. It would’ve been way too difficult for them to fake this many videos, to create the Hollywood CGI effects required to make the plane and explosion look as realistic as it did. Also the Boeing 767 weighs 300,000 pounds and it was traveling over 500 mph when it struck the South Tower. Of course it’s going to smash through the outer steel columns and into the open office area of the building. Those outer perimeter columns weren’t very big and robust. It definitely destroyed the outer perimeter columns at its point of impact, but there’s no way it could’ve completely destroyed the huge inner core columns. It’s far more plausible to place the blame on Dov Zakheim and his System’s Planning Corporation’s remote controlled airliners precision guided path into the towers.

  68. Hnery Balfour  February 10, 2011 at 7:14 am

    Bill Maher is a total tool, and despite his wry humour (which can be funny) I find him nauseous. Like many Jews, he lives a separate life where matters concerning Israel are concerned. It annoys me that many Jews anywhere in the world still put away their ethics, fairness, balance and so on where the issues concern Israel. They will never be free of this contamination. Maher is typical of the breed, scratch the surface and out pops a Zionist, or at least an apologist for Zionism.

  69. Dave Ambleton  February 10, 2011 at 5:28 am

    Interesting arithmetic – the incredible numbers

    Have a look at a typical account by one of the seemingly endless number of survivors: Olga Lengyel’s Five Chimneys: a woman survivor’s true story of Auschwitz (Granada/ Ziff-Davis, 1947, 1972).

    According to Lengyel, ‘After June, 1943, the gas chamber was reserved exclusively for Jews and Gypsies.. Three hundred and sixty corpses every half-hour, which was all the time it took to reduce human flesh to ashes, made 720 per hour, or 17,280 corpses per twenty-four hour shift. And the ovens, with murderous efficiency, functioned day and night. However, one must also reckon the death pits, which could destroy another 8,000 cadavers a day. In round numbers, about 24,000 corpses were handled each day. An admirable production record, one that speaks well for German industry.’ (Paperback edition, pp80-81). [No trace of any remains of or in ‘death pits’ has been found.]

    This implies almost 100,000 corpses per four working days, or a million in 40 days, or six million in 240 days (eight months). Notice the bald precision of the figures without any explanation, the utter confidence in the reader’s credulity.

    The blurb on the cover of the book quotes the New York Herald-Tribune: “Passionate, tormenting”. Albert Einstein, the promoter of the US construction of the bombs used at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, is quoted as offering “You have done a real service by letting the ones who are now silent and most forgotten speak.”

    Could this claim be a misprint?

    Kitty Hart, in spite of her name a Jewish survivor born in Poland, fully confirms these figures:

    ‘Working around the clock, the four units together could dispose of about 18,000 bodies every twenty-four hours, while the open pits coped with a further 8,000 in the same period.’ (p 118; Return to Auschwitz – paperback edition by Granada (1981, 1983).

    According to the cover blurb, ‘The subject of the award-winning Yorkshire television documentary of the same name.’ ‘Both engaging and harrowing…an important addition to the growing holocaust literature, very little of which conveys so courageously both the daily torment and the will to survive’ – Martin Gilbert, The Times.

  70. Dave Ambleton  February 10, 2011 at 5:25 am

    http://www.codoh.com/ – Committee for Open Debate on the “Holocaust”

    http://vho.org/

    http://vho.org/Links.html

  71. Dave Ambleton  February 10, 2011 at 5:23 am

    Elie Wiesel vs Encyclopaedia Britannica

    Wiesel has been one of the most prominent spokesmen for the very sizable group of people known as Holocaust survivors. Wiesel has chaired the US Holocaust Memorial Council and has been the recipient of a Congressional Gold Medal and Nobel Peace Prize..

    Time Magazine, March 18 1985:

    ‘How had he survived two of the most notorious killing fields [Auschwitz and Buchenwald] of the century? “I will never know” Wiesel says. “I was always weak. I never ate. The slightest wind would turn me over. In Buchenwald they sent 10,000 to their deaths every day. I was always in the last hundred near the gate. They stopped. Why?”

    Compare this with Encyclopaedia Britannica (1993), under ‘Buchenwald’:

    “In World War II it held about 20,000 prisoners.. Although there were no gas chambers, hundreds perished monthly through disease, malnutrition, exhaustion, beatings and executions.”

  72. Dave Ambleton  February 10, 2011 at 5:22 am

    It’s now official – there’s been no actual shortage of Holocaust Survivors :

    Quote from The Holocaust Industry by Norman G. Finkelstein of the City University of New York, published by Verso in the year 2000:

    ‘The Israeli Prime Minister’s office recently put the number of “living Holocaust survivors” at nearly a million.’ (page 83)

    ________________

    I’ve checked out the six volumes of Churchill’s Second World War and the statement is quite correct – not a single mention of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ‘six million’ Jewish victims of the war.

    Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; Churchill’s Second World War totals 4,448 pages; and De Gaulle’s three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages.

    In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi ‘gas chambers,’ a ‘genocide’ of the Jews, or of ‘six million’ Jewish victims of the war.

  73. J.F.E.  February 10, 2011 at 3:26 am

    Ron Paul 2012:

    Your thought experiment doesn’t work because a controlled demolition isn’t analogous to a stick of dynamite.

    Obviously, whether the demolition was nuclear or non-nuclear, it was planned & executed to pass (plausible deniability) some minimal level of scrutiny by the general public (and that’s all the perpetrators cared about). So, it was designed to collapse from points of impact. In that regard, the basement nuke was not designed to collapse the building, itself, but to prepare the building for total collapse. These were very strongly designed buildings, designed to survive a Boeing 707 impact (roughly the same size of a 767).

    Even thermite, by itself, likely would not have collapsed the buildings.

    Although, I agree, a single 150 kiloton bomb wouldn’t work. That’s where Khalezov’s theory is wrong in my opinion and Dr. Deagle’s theory makes more sense.

  74. Ron Paul 2012  February 9, 2011 at 11:54 pm

    William says:

    “you sound like one of those Israeli trolls”

    And William, you sound like either:

    A brainwashed hyper-reactionary chimp that isn’t too bright.

    OR

    You are trying to use reverse psychology to push people towards a straw man argument.

    Which one is it?

  75. Ron Paul 2012  February 9, 2011 at 11:03 pm

    William says:

    “Israel must be hard up to hire a troll as stupid as you”

    Thanks for proving you are not very bright, now move along….

  76. Ron Paul 2012  February 9, 2011 at 11:01 pm

    Maybe to make sure that no matter what happened the idiotic public (you) saw what they wanted you to see?

  77. William  February 9, 2011 at 10:58 pm

    you sound like one of those Israeli trolls

  78. William  February 9, 2011 at 10:56 pm

    Loser, what are you a retard? Why would MSM fake the footage if they had real plane footage? Israel must be hard up to hire a troll as stupid as you

  79. Ron Paul 2012  February 9, 2011 at 10:31 pm

    And here is Judy Wood looking like a complete fool.

    “Dr. Greg Jenkins Interviews Dr. Judy Wood”

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-558096240694803017#

  80. Ron Paul 2012  February 9, 2011 at 10:26 pm

    Okay, let me use a simple physical example to explain why this theory doesn’t hold up.
    ( I assume you all watched all 2-3 hours of Dimitri presentation )

    Lets say you blow up a stick of dynamite.
    Who is going to take the full force of the blast?
    Someone standing right next to it, or someone standing 40 feet away?
    Obviously the guy standing right next to it…

    Now if a nuclear detonation sends a shock wave up through the building which part of the building would receive the most damage?
    In this case obviously the bottom, because it was closest to the source.

    So the bottom of the building would take the most damage, not to mention there are millions of tons of weight pressing down on it from the structure above it.

    That would cause the BOTTOM of the building to collapse first.
    So, did the bottom of the building collapse first like it should have?

    NO, for some reason the top of the towers collapsed FIRST, and in a classic controlled demolition fashion.

    Sorry, the underground nuke theory just doesn’t hold up..

  81. J.F.E.  February 9, 2011 at 10:13 pm

    Hugh, you now totally come off as an intentional disinfo agent.

  82. J.F.E.  February 9, 2011 at 10:04 pm

    Hugh Manatee:

    I don’t know if you are a intentional disinfo agent (in fact, I’d prefer to think you’re just misguided). But the third link you provide comes off as pure intentional disinfo agent. Never do the administrators discuss Khalezov’s facts & evidence, instead all they try and do is run down Khalezov (even accuse him of just being a “virtual” person, and get hung-up on some incidental 911 pictures that Khalezov picked up from the internet as illustrative for his Bangkok video interview.

    This is why I suspect you are an intentional disinfo agent: Your two comments, here, are contradictory. You claim that “All the videos and photos are fake”.

    (Now, I apologize if you aren’t a disinfo agent, but frankly it’s hard to tell either way.)

    This is the same gambit as simonshack declares over at your third link and I suspect a component of the September Clues video.

    What better way to throw a spanner in the works of the 911 truth movement than claim ALL videos and picures of 911 are fake, then go onto claim that since ALL videos and pictures are fake…well, then, you can only believe OUR interpretation of the fake videos and pictures… and WE say, “There were no planes.”

    This may make sense to the bamboozled audience following the blog or forum (any doubters are quickly put down hard by the blog’s authors & leaders), but, when these people go out and spread the “truth”, it is so incredible, that others won’t even bother to investigate the salient facts & evidence, no matter how incriminating those facts & evidence may be.

    In effect, to say ALL videos & pictures are fake, is to say, you can never know what happened by close examination of those videos & pictures. In one stroke these disinfo agents have wiped-out a huge body of evidence from consideration.

    Evidence which any person who hasn’t investigated 911, yet, would almost immediately first encounter upon an investigation.

    Now, I understand disinfo tactics: Set up a blog or forum, attract a stream of traffic, then put out a ridiculous hypothesis, and have all the “followers”, once indoctrinated, go out and spread the disinfo.

    Myself, I never did follow one forum, I’ve researched all over the internet. In fact, I did not come to the micro nuke theory by way of Khalezov. There are several different takes on the micro nuke theory.

    (Perhaps, that’s why I never got hung-up on the ridiculous “no plane” disinfo.)

    Rather, after researching all the different ideas, I take a composite approach: There was more than one nuke for each building, but the biggest were in the basements, and as Deagle (another micro nuke proponent) states, there were smaller micro nukes, in a “string of micro nuke pearls” running up the core columns with thermite cutting charges situated at the outer columns.

    Regarding the specifics, I could be wrong — I wasn’t there — but I come back to the China Syndrome pools of molten metal in the footprints, and the cars far away from the WTC which were burned, some totally, some in unusual fashion, but totally inconsistent with mechanical gravity collapse and highly unlikely by thermite alone.

    To burn cars far away from the WTC there is a need for high temperatures generated by large energy sources. Not to mention over a third of the towers were turned to dust and around a thousand persons where atomized to the extent that even their DNA was not identifiable — simple burning doesn’t do that.

  83. Ron Paul 2012  February 9, 2011 at 10:02 pm

    Disregard Fulfords B.S.
    He has been 100% WRONG about everything for the past 4 years.
    Either his sources are intentionally feeding him lies or he is a shill.

  84. Ron Paul 2012  February 9, 2011 at 10:00 pm

    Wrong.

    “X-51 Hypersonic Cruise Missile – Fastest Cruise Missile”

    http://www.futurefirepower.com/x-51-hypersonic-cruise-missile-fastest-cruise-missile

  85. Ron Paul 2012  February 9, 2011 at 9:58 pm

    Your idiotic theory doesn’t prove there were no planes.
    At best it only says the MSM footage was fake.
    Learn how to think straight please.
    *rolls eyes*

  86. Hugh  February 9, 2011 at 9:58 pm

    ‘Also, note the “no planes” idea is based on strictly video — no physical evidence’

    physical evidence is the fact that every rule for a hijacked plane (interception, shoot down) was Not followed- why bother, there was no plane

  87. Hugh  February 9, 2011 at 8:45 pm

    If anyone is interested here is a link to a lot of Judy Wood’s 911 research.
    http://www.checktheevidence.com/cms/

  88. J.F.E.  February 9, 2011 at 7:09 pm

    I watched the Youtube — it does not persuade me that there were in fact “no planes”. Too tortuous. Also, it should be noted that while many people on the ground didn’t see the plane hit, others did report seeing the second plane approach and hit the South tower.

    There is evidence, i.e., the French documentary film, and the live news video, which captured the sound of the first plane hitting the North tower.

    The “ball” is just the second plane approaching the South tower at an poor angle, lighting, and t.v. quality video for high resolution observation and discernment.

    There were limited amounts of plane wreckage identified on the ground.

    Is it intentional disinfo? Probably not, just folks letting their imagination get the best of them (there certainly could be disinfo agents running with it). Many claim the holes in the buildings are not consistent with what an aluminum plane could do (as in aluminum planes could not make holes at all), others claim the shapes are not the right size and shape, or the broken columns are pointed out (actually the columns are not pointed out) and so on.

    Also, note the “no planes” idea is based on strictly video — no physical evidence, while the over all 911 inside job theory is solidly based on physical evidence, physics, known architectural properties, and numerous witness reports, both in New York and at the Pentagon.

    I want to be easy on the “no plane” people because some are good faith folks who have bought into a weak idea, but others are definitely disinfo agents running with an idea that makes the 911 truth movement look ridiculous to average folks who haven’t critically examined the facts & evidence.

    Remember, defeating an idea is similar to defeating a political group, divide into competing rival ideas, instead of one challenging idea. Atomize the people into as many different groups as possible, hopefully fighting with each other, but if not that, at least presenting a confusing multiplicity of ideas. This way, people throw up their hands and don’t know what to believe — this is a victory for the status quo idea.

  89. John Kountouris  February 9, 2011 at 7:04 pm

    I am certainly EXCITED about this info to say the least. Let’s pray for Dimitri and all of the VT staff as they are on the front lines here.

  90. Ron Paul 2012  February 9, 2011 at 6:08 pm

    +1

  91. Hugh Manatee  February 9, 2011 at 5:13 pm

    they use computers

  92. bf  February 9, 2011 at 4:52 pm

    “No-planes” is bogus, absurd and meant to discredit… who is manning the camera, Cass Sunstein?

  93. wolf  February 9, 2011 at 4:33 pm

    Tex:
    How can YOU as an engineer, physicist and mathematician look at that video clip of WTC7 collapsing neatly into its own footprint at freefall speed and not realize that it could ONLY collapse that way from controlled demolition???

    You are probably aware that WTC7 was NOT hit by an airplane that day and that the melting point of structural steel is MUCH higher than the temperature produced by a hydrocarbon-fueled fires?? Besides which, any kid that builds a tower out of blocks knows that these collapses just don’t LOOK right…that they SHOULD have been asymmetrical which wasn’t the case. All THREE buildings collapsed as if their supports had been simultaneously yanked out from under them…which they were by pre-planted explosives and thermite cutter charges.

    I know you don’t want to believe that your government could DO this…but it is the sad and shocking TRUTH. The evidence is overwhelming for those who have the courage to overcome their cognitive dissonance about this. It is NOT a case of ‘he said – she said’. It is science…physics, metallurgy, structural engineering. DO THE MATH!!! The official story doesn’t add up. It is a huge LIE!

  94. TYLER KENT  February 9, 2011 at 4:16 pm

    james johnson,
    shill

  95. Ingrid B  February 9, 2011 at 3:51 pm

    you have to hand it to them, the Israeli/Mossad are nothing if not thorough..

  96. ron101  February 9, 2011 at 3:43 pm

    Hi J.F.E

    New analysts of the plane shots by Richard D. Hall in 2010 has shed light over the planes/no planes debate.

    Very convincing

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ShbY0Oa-6v8

  97. Ingrid B  February 9, 2011 at 3:34 pm

    yes, it is pointless trying to talk to people who don`t want to know.. a friend sent me a link to a show, a big mouthed pea brain called Maher interviewing an Egyptian woman and Maher managed to slip in a degrading comment about Iran, it`s contageous..

  98. Hugh Manatee  February 9, 2011 at 3:27 pm

    Dimitri says holgrams. i agree with simon shack, ace baker, killtown etc. no planes, just CGI. The perps own all the networks. All the videos and photos are fake. People, like Bollyn, still analyze them. In fact it should make no diff if there were planes or not. But to the perps it makes all the difference in the world, so they spend millions trying to kill ‘no planes’ theory. No planes= MSM complicity= a legal liability beyond belief !

    http://killtown.blogspot.com/2007/05/why-they-didnt-use-planes-to-hit-wtc.html

    Here is some very interesting reading:

    http://www.septemberclues.info/historical.htm

    http://z6.invisionfree.com/Reality_Shack/index.php?showtopic=166

  99. Dr.Nur  February 9, 2011 at 2:52 pm

    As said above plutonium leaves almost no gamma rays but kills via alpha rays unseen to Geiger radioactivity counter. Please read Vialls and Khalezov before confusing others with idle ignorant questions. It is time to get oneself a complete education !

  100. AS  February 9, 2011 at 2:50 pm

    seems more probable then that the lower radiation level, depends on the exposure to it… leukemia, thyroid etc.. are some of the ones appearing after radioactive exposition… if we rely on chernobyl reports

  101. AS  February 9, 2011 at 2:46 pm

    supersonci missiles are defensive weapon… not offensive !

  102. AS  February 9, 2011 at 2:45 pm

    I am fully aware of the kalhesov explanation Dr Nur and red it long time ago… still though I am not convinced that micro nukes alone can generate controled demolition like we saw as too powerful, knowing that white smoke is one of the sgintaure of micro-nuke… that’s why I brought the nanthermite on… not to undermine that kind of explanation…

    if micro nukes at the basement… there should be a radioactive remaining even at lower levels…and a combination of micro-nuke and hyperconcentrated thermonanite might have been used… as explained in some posts…

    for your information supersonic lmissiels are defensive missiles aimed a carier not to attack… so Iran had the capability to break any war boat in the area

  103. Vladimir  February 9, 2011 at 2:30 pm

    Another puzzling 9/11 anomaly that doesn’t seem to garner much attention yet should at least be discussed – was it just a coincidence that there was massive hurricane(bigger than Katrina) parked just offshore of NYC on 9/11/01 ?

  104. J.F.E.  February 9, 2011 at 2:25 pm

    People tend to “latch onto” or hold onto initial ideas and defend those initial ideas, inspite of new facts & evidence, this is where I think a majority of “thermite alone” proponents stand, also, I think this is where the Directed Energy Weapon (DEW) people stand. I don’t think Judy Wood is a disinfo agent nor is Khalezov a disinfo agent. I suspect both have come to different conclusions based on their training & experience, leading to different interpretations of the same events.

    Sure, I’m no nuclear or DEW expert, but considering the two theories, the nuclear theory has more supporting and consistent facts & evidence going for it, in my opinion.

    Are there disinfo agents and “limited” hangout agents of disinfo? Undoubtedly yes, but one needs to be careful deciding that just because someone has a different interpretation of events from their own, doesn’t necessarily mean that person is a “disinfo” agent.

  105. kelli  February 9, 2011 at 2:08 pm

    Alright, you mentioned Ben Fulford. Is he disinfo. and if not, why haven’t the assassins started kicking some ass yet?

  106. J.F.E.  February 9, 2011 at 2:08 pm

    As stated previously, I subscribe to the micro nukes theory of the WTC demolition, but the one aspect of Khalezov’s theory I have problems with is the “no planes” hit the building assertion.

    People on the ground were not necessarily looking up at the South tower, high over head, a plane going 500 miles an hour would plunge into the building and be “gone”, literally in a blink of an eye, before the sound wave reached the ground, so, of course, many people would not look up in time to see the plane’s impact. And, many viewing from a distance, would be blocked from seeing the second plane approaching. Or be diverted to looking at the North tower’s flames and smoke at the top.

    There are many, too many, in my opinion, videos showing the second plane’s impact. Also, the shape and progression of the explosion, as it ripped through the South tower, from the point of impact to the other side, is consistent with a plane impact.

    Was the first impact on the North Tower faked, too?

    We have the film of the impact, but also in the Youtube video I linked to in a previous comment, you can hear the plane approaching and hitting the North tower, with contemperaneous witnesses heard commenting it sounded like a plane impact.

    Unfortunately, Khalezov’ claim of “no airplanes” gives many sceptics (and supporters of the “thermite alone” theory) the golden opportunity to write-off the nuclear demolition thesis without closely examining the supporting facts & evidence.

    The amazing thing is that of the people who do examine the facts & evidence (and who also don’t have an agenda to debunk 911 truth for whatever reason) come away by substantial margins, 8 out of 10, or higher, that 911 was an inside job, and of those people, I suspect if they examine the facts & evidence of micro nukes, a similar high proportion would also subscribe to the nuke thesis.

    People tend to “latch onto” or hold onto initial ideas and defend those initial ideas, inspite of new facts & evidence, this is where I think a majority of “thermite alone” proponents stand. As pointed out by Khalezov, the amount of thermite or even superduper nanothermate required to bring down the buildings the way they were (China sydrome, cars burnt out far-off from the WTC footprints and so on) would be huge, but the amount of thermitic material needed if accompanied by micro-nukes, would be much more managable for the perpetrators to pull off.

  107. kelli  February 9, 2011 at 2:02 pm

    What I can’t wrap my head around is why the elites would go for all out nuclear war when they would have to live through it too. What would they have left to themselves? A little parcel of paradise in the southern hemisphere? Decadent undergound bunkers? I’m not trying to diss your statement but the same question occurs to me when people mention chemtrails. Don’t they breath the same air?

    Can anyone explain this?

  108. Hugh Manatee  February 9, 2011 at 1:52 pm

    his job is to present an alternative to Dr Judy Wood, who I believe hit the nail on the head with directed energy weapons. If nukes were being used why would Rothschild want to be present -to get irradiated?

  109. TYLER KENT  February 9, 2011 at 1:24 pm

    Texas Grunt,
    Do Engineers or Physicists or Mathematicians ever lie?

  110. Hugh Manatee  February 9, 2011 at 1:06 pm

    Let’s recap Demitri’s published stroy: a Russian is friends with a Mossad perp who confesses to him at a party. The Russian proceeds to ‘spill the beans’ all over the net- with impunity (and publishes his address and phone # on the net). ………..ok! I thought Cheney did it in the oval office with a Tesla coil

  111. J.F.E.  February 9, 2011 at 12:56 pm

    The basement explosions were necessary to undermine the foundations, in preperation for upper level explosions to collapse the whole buildings.

    Keep this in mind: Once the decision by the perpetrators was made to destroy the Twin Towers, that destruction had to be insured to be complete. Think what would have happened if the demolition only partially or didn’t bring down the buildings — evidence of demolition would have been very hard to cover-up.

    So, the perpetrators had to guarantee complete distruction.

    The perpetrators had to go for broke.

    Micro nukes go the farthest to guaranteeing complete distruction. There were even plans for “nuclear demolition” of the Twin Towers in the 60’s as part of the permitting process before the towers were okay’d for building.

  112. J.F.E.  February 9, 2011 at 12:22 pm

    No, you haven’t studied the evidence. Khalezov presents evidence that advanced micro nukes, as part of 1960’s “nuclear demolition” projects were designed to give off as little measureable radiation as possible. 30 plus years on, that technical sophistication undoubtedly had only increased.

  113. J.F.E.  February 9, 2011 at 12:15 pm

    Cancer has been reported in First Responders, a whole series of cancers, many not related to the lungs, but consistent with radiation exposure.

    And, as everybody knows, cancer from exposure to intermediate radiation levels can take years to activate. It is now going on 10 years from 911 and cancers in First Responders is dramatically higher than the general population, even the New York City population, blood cancers and organ cancers.

  114. PAUL LEO FASO  February 9, 2011 at 11:20 am

    Unless you had a 6000 pound anvil fall on your skull and then be run over by an M 1 A 1 ABRAMS BATTLE TANK, you have figured correctly that the entire W.T.C. complex was blasted off the face of the earth by controlled nuclear devices.

    Nealy 10 years after the detonation, the site is a cover-up of the radiation that explains the lack of any new replacement towers to this day and the installation of “REFLECTING POOLS” directly above the footprints of the demolished towers to contain the residual radiation.

    The continuing death of the workers and the fight for their health benefits stand as a reminder of the nature of the criminal demolition and the deceit of all those in our government to suppress the truth.

    For those who would like to further study this evidence:

    http:www.wtcdemolition.blogspot.com/

    While at the website, go and view complete profile under “about us” for more links to the evidence.

  115. AS  February 9, 2011 at 10:36 am

    someone has any link about radioactive levels measured … lung cancers and cancers can be trigger by asbestos in the dust as well … but evidence of radiactivity would definitevly settle the Khalezov explanation…

  116. AS  February 9, 2011 at 10:33 am

    it can be Greg… as Rafik Hariri was killed with these micro nuke

  117. AS  February 9, 2011 at 10:32 am

    use of micro nuke in the basement can be an explantion to start the full sequence of demolition but it does not explain all of it, we lack knoweledge of comparison between tempareture that can be reached with hyper concentration of thermite and comparison with micro nukes

  118. james johnson  February 9, 2011 at 10:32 am

    If mini nukes were used in the destruction of the WTC, radioactive residual will be found in the dust. Samples can be found now, and tested.
    If no evidence can be found of radioactive traces, than Khalezov is running a disinformation campaign for reasons yet to be revealed.

  119. AS  February 9, 2011 at 10:27 am

    explosion in the basement wer never denied here by anybody we wre not denying that… we are talking about the full picture… basement explosions took place but placing an extra charge in the basement like in this explanation would have provoke a fall of the towers not control demolition like we all saw during this day…

  120. AS  February 9, 2011 at 10:24 am

    we are talking scientific facts here not who’s who… are saying there was not nanothermite and no control demolition, obvisously there was… rest are different theories put forward by different countries and intel agencies… like meyssan and french DGSE, and other brought to people… but the thermonanite made in place by dual citizen, american-israeli companies is the one that looks to me the more plausible…

    who’s who and who is shooting at who… not my business , clear ?

  121. AS  February 9, 2011 at 10:19 am

    I am scientist too Dr Nur and certainly not … a zionist but it loosk to me that an explanation like thiss would have make the tower fallen not looks like a control demolition, that’s my point fo view… that’s why I raised the point so don’t picture people as zionist when they are not sharing your opinion… Ok ?

  122. Dr.Nur  February 9, 2011 at 6:46 am

    Bollyn and Jones have been shown to be powerfull “trojan”disinformation agents by no less than the great Michael Collins Piper,Mark Glenn, Brother Nathanael,etc. So is Brigham Young University for that matter. A “peer review”means zero in banana republic like American where elections and politicians are bought out criminals and fakes too. Where every war is caused by a by a false-flag or a farce from the zionist narco-military complex. So with 9/11 “commission”etc,etc. …Isramerica: the greatest plague of mankind since Gengis-Khan…

  123. Dr.Nur  February 9, 2011 at 6:23 am

    Whatever it is Iran may or may not have it is certainly defensive in intentions. Iran, a country that never attacked another in a few hundreds years is surroundered and threaten of nuclear genocide for nuclear weapons it never had or ever could use anyway by the Isramerican genocide narcopetrol doomsday mafia which used and uses such nukes everyday as well as Haarp weapons for earthquakes,floods,etc/ see http://www.haarp.net and Benjamin-Fulford-Japan’s future PM -for evidence of Haarp attacks and blackmail on Japan, China etc.,. By the way Iran has no bases on the US borders. What are the US and Mossad doing at Iran’s border? I am definitly on the side of truth,justice and Iran-a 3000 y.o civilized people,against the rat-cat talmudic and ziocon “lube-boys”cowboys.

  124. Greg Bacon  February 9, 2011 at 4:29 am

    Mini-nukes used in the basements of the ‘Twins’ and thermite used to cut steel beams to make sure that WTC 1 & 2 fell into their own footprints.

    Couldn’t take a chance that they’d fall onto their ‘Temples of Greed and Theft,’ the NYSE and the NY Federal Reserve building.

  125. ulysees  February 9, 2011 at 3:32 am

    Yeah LOL Liberace Bush HA!!

  126. ulysees  February 9, 2011 at 3:28 am

    It Smells of the TRUTH to me… that spire video needs to go VIRAL…

    They called back all the ambassadors for a very special reason, the towers have been hit and are on fire, the rats are getting out… We’re there and we need to get busier.

    I am so glad you go this together Bru-ster When i first watch Khalezov i believed him straight off. Now this feature of the melted granite beneath the site is awsome, thanks again for being invovlved

    Blessings to all of You…. DEFY, Do NOT Comply!! viva la EVOLUTION down with the Oligarchs

  127. Dr.Nur  February 9, 2011 at 3:21 am

    http://www.whale.to/b/vialls_h.html and http://www.web.archive.org/web/20030210220533/homepage.ntlworld.com/steveseymour/nuke/bali_micro_nuke.htm for detailed proof of molecular and atomic dissociation by the outstanding martyr-journalist-scientist Joe-Vialls

  128. J. Bruce Campbell  February 9, 2011 at 2:09 am

    Yeah, I’m not too slick on doing this yet. Here’s the piece:

    http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=625926

  129. Dr.Nur  February 9, 2011 at 2:01 am

    For the hard-to-convince above the nuclear blast is not an aerial blast for those who wanted to see the windows fly but a full underground nuclear explosion,the destruction power of which is in the high speed shock waves which induce atomic and molecular dissociation of concrete and steal to powder. Please before criticizing did you read Khalezov’s book carefully? For independent confirmation you only to google his leads. Here is my independent confirmation: http://www.just-another-inside-job.blogspot.com/2007/04/building-wtc-to-detonate-it.html or go to http://www.factsnotfairies.blogspot.com . The thermite is there as false-chemical-signature. Israel-mossad puts a cocktail of Syntex-TNT with every micronuke at mosks,markets,churches,hotels,etc..

  130. ProudPrimate  February 9, 2011 at 1:49 am

    “His latest interview is here.” Bruce — you’ve got a dead link there

  131. ProudPrimate  February 9, 2011 at 1:45 am

    “Liberace-Bush” LOL I remember the Hirschfeld cartoon of Bush in the 88 campaign, on the cover of Newsweek — title “The Wimp Factor”

  132. ProudPrimate  February 9, 2011 at 1:38 am

    correction — “only the” building exploding, not “the only”

  133. ProudPrimate  February 9, 2011 at 1:34 am

    For me, the duration of the hot spots can scarcely be explained by non-nuclear means. That above all was the most compelling new idea in Dimitri’s interview. I’ve seen enough molten metal to know that it doesn’t stay hot for 6 weeks. Even if residual thermite were at work, it could hardly hold on for that length of time. But if a mass of molten granite and steel mixed existed of the diameter (100m) he describes, well insulated by the earth, it is much more easily conceivable to have it maintain that level of temperature for that length of time — a matter of mass, diameter, insulation (and possibly residual radioactivity, like a nuke plant boiling water, but that’s a bonus to the foregoing.)

    I thought I remember Dimitri mentioning that thermite would have been part of the scenario as well, perhaps (can’t remember for sure) having to do with the scissoring out the silhouette of the plane for the supposed impact hole. Ha! Like a kid in a cartoon that runs through a screen door, the silhouette shows his ears and all his fingers. That’s how bogus the profile of the plane was.

    I remember marking that part of the interview, because I was very conscious of the amount of nanothermite in the dust samples, unburned, being really quite high, proportionally. Perhaps the microspheres of iron were nuclear in origin, but that would mean they were steel, not iron, ie., contain iron carbide (pearlite), which Harrit, Jones, & al. seemed to rule out.

    But the testimony of reporters on the ground that saw no planes but the only building exploding — three separate witnesses as I recall, plus the video of the nose of the plane — as pristine as Arlen Specter’s magic bullet after making seven wounds — coming out the other side of the building: that was either faked to look fake, after the fact, by promulgators of this theory, or it’s irrefutable. Does anyone know for certain the provenance of that footage?

  134. Ann  February 8, 2011 at 11:11 pm

    Would this have anything to do with the Bushes’ purchase a few years ago of approx 100k acres of land in Paraguay?

  135. J.F.E.  February 8, 2011 at 10:55 pm

    The following youtube is a powerful presentation:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HI1mxHmxjKw

    Watch the video to the end: Witness testimony is clear that a bomb (s) detonated in the basement, but, also, at 6:58 in the video, a live remote T. V. video feed from the morning of 911 is presented. You hear the first plane approaching, but an instant before the first plane hits, there is a “boom” type noise, but more important, an electromagnetic distortion briefly disrupts the video image, then the next instant the plane can be heard hitting the WTC 1.

    (An explanation that does not include an EMP for the live video image being briefly distorted at the same time a “boom” is heard over the video, but happens before the plane impact is heard would be appreciated.)

    A plane hit at the top of the building would not cause an electromagnetic distortion on a remote live video, but a micro nuke would.

    This electromagnetic distortion is an Electro magnetic Pulse (EMP) caused by a nuclear detonation. So, there it is, the initial nuclear detonation is caught on a live video feed tape (at the time).

    At 4:44 of the video, witness testimony describes “hanging” skin of person in the basement (and hearing & feeling an explosion below him [this witness was in the basement] and then another more distant explosion above him).

    Another witness on the video describes “hanging skin” of persons in the basement of WTC 1.

    (“Hanging” skin and “melting” skin were reported after the Hiroshima nuclear bomb bast in Japan at the end of WWII.)

    Off video, but documented in other videos and witness testimony: The China Syndrome, pools of molten metal in the footprints of all three WTC buildings. And cars, whole parking lots of cars, well away from WTC 1 and 2 that are burned. Mechanical gravity collapse would not cause the temperatures required to burn cars that far away from the footprints of the buildings.

    Cars, burned in unusual patterns, half the car burned, car doors popping out of their frames, cars burned, but rubber untouched, cars burned from the inside out. This suggests electromagnetic plasma (free electrons & ions) were present within the pyroclastic flows causing electrical “shorts” upon contact with the metal components of the cars.

    People knocked over by a shock wave. A car door “popped” out of its frame and struck a woman first responder (she gave a statement).

    There are more facts & evidence of micro nukes and this explanation is the only explanation that takes into account all the physical evidence & witness testimony.

    Watch the video to the end!

    As to the “official” story:

    1) How can 100’s of columns of steel be turned to dust by gravity, aircraft and jet fuel fires? They can’t!

    2) How can cars near the WTC be turned upside down by gravity, “collapses” of buildings and jet fuel fires? They can’t.

    Why does the corner column (presumably much stronger than the outer-side columns) on WTC 2 give way at exactly the same time as all the outer colums (as opposed to maintaining strength & rigidity longer) at that corner (initial site of collapse?

  136. Ken Rechtstein  February 8, 2011 at 10:18 pm

    Focusing our efforts onto gathering evidence regarding fool play (9/11 and interrelated Financial Frauds) and putting together a team of EXPERT LAWYERS to prosecute in the USA and EU the Zion Talmudic Mafia Dons and its Sayanim-Helpers, is our ONLY chance to turn the tide and make the entire world rally in to eradicate once for all the Zios’ control of the Money-Media-politics and subversion of the peace in the planet for power and to make their psychopathic dream of world domination come true.

    Together with above stated way to proceed, other parallel-concurring actions might be considered too, like NO VOTE to Israel’s Friends-Supporters, Boycott of Israeli product and cultural academic exchange activities with Israel,rooting out Israel’s Sayanim in Academia and Official Institution-freezing them out, campaign: “Not my tax money to Israel”, etc., etc. Getting the Non-Zionist Jews to choose sides: America-peaceful living with mankind or the Talmud-Israel and its crimes…

  137. J. Bruce Campbell  February 8, 2011 at 9:48 pm

    Downright fascinating, I’d call it.

  138. Ron Paul 2012  February 8, 2011 at 9:46 pm

    @J. Bruce Campbell

    That’s interesting. Hmmmm

  139. J. Bruce Campbell  February 8, 2011 at 9:42 pm

    Check this out:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-dWBBEtA5bI

  140. Ron Paul 2012  February 8, 2011 at 9:37 pm

    And Steven Jones’ work has been acknowledged through peer review.

  141. Ron Paul 2012  February 8, 2011 at 9:36 pm

    Can you find that, I’d like to see it.

  142. Ron Paul 2012  February 8, 2011 at 9:35 pm

    http://www.ae911truth.org/en/evidence.html

    Dr. Robert M. Bowman:

    Head of Advanced Space Programs for DOD and retired Lt. Col for United States Air Force, a combat pilot who flew 101 missions in the Vietnam War, now a peace-activist criticizing the Star-Wars-program, talks about the impossibility of the official government story and the subsequent widespread and systematic destruction of evidence and cover-up. He also asks us to look at who benefited from 9/11. He holds a Ph.D. in Aeronautics and Nuclear Engineering from the California Institute of Technology.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlGm9ZorT4Q

    ( I think Robert Bowman knows better than you TexGrunt )

  143. J. Bruce Campbell  February 8, 2011 at 9:32 pm

    There is a video of the jagged spire of the central core still standing in the immediate aftermath of the explosive collapse of Building 1. Before our eyes it disintegrates to dust and blows away in the breeze. Stephen Jones’ thermate explanation does not address the explosions and disintegration of the three buildings as far as I’m aware.

  144. Ron Paul 2012  February 8, 2011 at 9:27 pm

    I think you need to go back to school and research the asymmetric advantage hypersonic missiles plays in modern warfare.

  145. Texas Grunt  February 8, 2011 at 9:27 pm

    So far, the best of a bad lot of conflicting testimony. BTW, Dr. Nur(d) what kind of mad scientist do you profess to be?

    Keep digging everybody. I hate to say it, but if you can convince me, rather than he says / she says. Then. you 9/11 truthers might have a solid starting place.

    T.G. Engineer, Physicist, Mathematician

  146. Doug  February 8, 2011 at 8:45 pm

    Well, we know that there was high tech thermite in the dust samples..Steven Jones was fired from Brigham Young University at the request of Mr. Dick Cheney (yes, he still lives), one of the main planners of this complex operation, for releasing his paper on the high tech thermite found in the dust samples. See Kevin Ryan’s paper on the implication of the thermite byproducts found in the lung samples of the first responders and other New Yorkers who were present and breathing amidst the pyroclastic clouds of toxic dust. let’s not make this more complicated that it need be as there is plenty of evidence to convict these many sick bastard traitors and when we find an attorney general with big enough testicles or ovaries..these people will he held accountable!

  147. Mallee  February 8, 2011 at 8:26 pm

    Everyone must read E. P Heidner’s 9/11 thesis in three papers under the heading;
    ‘9/11-commision-report-revised-december-2008’. One has to have a dark humour to realise that the gravity and heinousnesss of the 9/11 treasonous mass murders is a hoot.

    It takes time but it is a must.

    I can confirm the part about the Nugan Hand Bank and what they were reportedly up to in the late 1970’s, to the ‘suicide’ of Frank Nugan. Heidner is not quite fully informed on that aspect, there is more.

    The mystery is: who really is ‘Heidner’? Anyone know?

  148. Dr.Nur  February 8, 2011 at 8:01 pm

    Thanks for your little zionist stint Mr.A.S. I can’t believe you are the same AS as before. Iran is only a courageous little country with a tiny military budget. Your friends for whom you are worried about have budgets and military like this: the USA alone has a military budget equal to the rest of the world combined. Israel has the fourth mightiest army in material,firepower,assets,ahead of Britain and France. About WTC you cannot be “convinced” unless you are a scientist. I happen to be one. There are so many self appointed “thinkers”who like to say “I believe”or I am “convinced” about “thermite”just because they had a few beers… There is nothing one can tell them except to go back to school…

  149. tom  February 8, 2011 at 7:58 pm

    Read the free chapters of Khalezov’s book and you will be convinced too.

    Thermite would have taken a lot of time and produced a lot of fire, light and smoke before collapsing the towers in an uncontrollable fashion (i.e. asimmetrically). Khalezov also matematically shows why it could not be done realistically by conventional explosives. Then he reveal the original demolition plan required by NYC regulation, and how it was most likely implemented (that involves WTC7, and 2 150 Kiloton nukes about 70 meters underground).

    Something in Khalezov’s reconstruction remain unexplained to me: i.e. why we did not see all the windows of the towers explode (or at least break) a couple of seconds before collapsing? Only explanation that I can find is that the video were faked. He too suggest this whe he ridiculize the idea that aluminium jets could penetrate the massive steel frame bars of the towers.

    For general background on 9/11, look for “Collateral Damage” an ebook by By E.P. Heidner that you can find online for free. It is an absolute must read.

  150. AS  February 8, 2011 at 6:38 pm

    Theory brought by Bollyn and Pr Jones with thermonanite is far more convincing to me… but interesting

    Iran can sink US, brit and french carier with suspersonic missiles…do you really believe Israel can match Iran… ?

    Iran test-fires new supersonic missile

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/8309873/Iran-test-fires-new-supersonic-missile.html

  151. Dr.Nur  February 8, 2011 at 5:58 pm

    Note that Mike Harari was a close drugs trade partner of George H.Bush and for the above assassinations too

  152. Dr.Nur  February 8, 2011 at 5:51 pm

    Also it is good to mention that Dimitri Khalezov precised that it was most likely medium sized tactical nuclear bombs which the US army used in the subway tunnels near the Baghdad airport to melt the 20000 heroic iraki national guard that was hiding there and blocking the advance to Baghdad in the most difficult and finally most cowardly US army battle in history-which was reported as a “piece of cake”for public consumption-while 3000 US “cannon fodder”soldiers who were in close combat positions were nuked and melted as well. A secret “classified”to this day but their comrades and survivors have reported this in details at http://www.ghosttroop.net or http://www.ghosttroops.net. Every veteran should read about it. Indeed it was not micronukes or neutron bombs of the like the US used at Fallujah,and all over Irak,Afghanistan,etc.,the effects of which are explained as DU or “depleted uranium”when actually it was plutonium and the radiation sickness of which caused by alpha rays (not detected by Geiger counter) . Such are the true daily deeds of the Isramerican narcopetrol mafia on behalf of the Rothschild talmudic plunder-murder master-race scroundrels

  153. Dr.Nur  February 8, 2011 at 5:23 pm

    Absolutly , when I read Dimitri Khalezov’s book (available in the shorter version free as pdf download) it made perfect sense to me as clearly the WTC was pulverized into dust by powerful shockwaves from the basement up that no thermite or jet fuel could ever do. Mike Harari was involved in the murder of JFK as well as that of Jon-Jon JFK junior and at 84 or so is involved in running MI6 and CIA ops for Mossad out of Israel’s London embassy. Dimitri Khalezov has documented the regular use of micronukes by Mossad to assassinate Rafiq Hariri,to bomb the disco at Bali, the Mariott hotels in Jakarta and Islamabad,the american and french UN soldiers at Beirut (in order to avoid witnesses to Sharon’s further raping and sodomizing the screaming litte palestinian boys before shooting their brains point blank like at Sabra and Shatila). The great australian journalist Joe-Vialls also did complete studies on all these micronuke mossad crimes (as small as a golf ball) before being assassinated for it by Mossad in 2005.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH
From Veterans Today Network