Dimitri Khalezov talks about nuclear terrorism, 9/11 and who is responsible for terror attacks that have killed thousands of Americans.

By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor

What if someone could prove that the terrorist bombs, Oklahoma City, Beirut Marine Barracks, the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia, the Bali attacks and more, many more weren’t car and truck bombs at all, not the kind we were told, what then?  Buildings thrown into the air like toys, mushroom clouds rise a dozen miles, explosions larger than anything known previously, many times larger than the biggest bomb, even larger than exploding munition ships from World War 2.  These have happened over and over, been misreported in our news, nuclear attacks, new precision weapons that emulate conventional explosives.

[youtube 4aGY5oWffas]

Khalezov says that when we hear truck or car bombs, sometimes something else is going on, something sinister.  One case in particular stands out, the murder of over 200 US Marines in Lebanon in 1983.  Americans are told that a truck bomb blew up a four story building, heavily reinforced, killing everyone in and near it.  The explosion could be seen in Israel and felt in Cyprus.  We are told this was the largest non-nuclear explosion in history:

The suicide bomber detonated his explosives, which were equivalent to 12,000 pounds (about 5,400 kg) of TNT. The force of the explosion collapsed the four-story cinder-block building into rubble, crushing many inside.It is said  to have been the largest non-nuclear blast ever (deliberately) detonated on the face of the earth. “The force of the explosion,” “initially lifted the entire four-story structure, shearing the bases of the concrete support columns, each measuring fifteen feet in circumference and reinforced by numerous one and three quarter inch steel rods. The airborne building then fell in upon itself. A massive shock wave and ball of flaming gas was hurled in all directions.”

About 20 seconds later, an identical attack occurred against the barracks of the French 3rd Company of the 6th French Parachute Infantry Regiment. Another suicide bomber drove his truck down a ramp into the building’s underground parking garage and detonated his bomb, leveling the headquarters.

The claim is that the explosives in the truck were equal to 6 tons of TNT and made the largest explosion known to man, even larger than the blast made when, in 1944, the munitions ship, USS Mt. Hood exploded.  However, the Hood was loaded with 4000 tons or as we call it now, 4 “kilotons” of explosives.  Beirut was bigger, much bigger, not 6 tons, not even 4000 tons but 10,000 tons.  The Marine and French barracks in Lebanon were destroyed by two variable yield nuclear weapons, each set to 10 kilotons, roughly half the size of the nuclear weapon that destroyed Hiroshima.


Until 1992, Dimitri Khalezov was a Soviet military specialist.  His job?  He tracked the use of nuclear weapons around the world, not just from known nuclear states and not just the bombs we all fear will rain Armageddon on us and our


children by other nuclear weapons as well.  Dimitri Khalezov says that nuclear weapons and been used many times, “micro-nukes” and he can prove it.  Khalezov says that small nuclear weapons, known as “dial a nukes” with selected output of as low as 10 tons of TNT and up to 100,000 tons are commonly used for car and truck bombs.

We talked about this today.  I was skeptical.  Then he sent me something that hit me between the eyes.  I was asking him if he knew about the January 24, 2010 “suicide bombing” in Moscow that killed 35 and injured over 100.  He sent me an article from CNN, something I had never seen and something that, if read carefully will take your breath away.


The BBC said it “sounds like a car bomb.”  They also quoted it as being described as an “almighty explosion.”  This was how the explosions two weeks ago were described in Moscow, but this wasn’t the first time.

We have seen these bombs before, damage on a massive scale, and were told it was fertilizer in the trunk of a car set off by a mobile phone.  Then I read the statement carried in the CNN article, one I have been told has been suppressed.  This was another similar bomb, a truck bomb used to attack a Moscow apartment complex.  The year was 1999.

This time, the truth got out, for a while at least, picked up by CNN but quickly suppressed.  This is what the authorities in Russia said:

“The force of the blast was equivalent to about 100-300 tons of TNT, it said.”

The link to the CNN video has been disabled, but we have the description as given to CNN by Russian officials:

“At least 17 people were killed and more than 115 injured when explosives hidden in a truck or an underground pipe blew off the front of a nine-story apartment block in Volgodonsk, about 800 kilometers (500 miles) south of Moscow, Russian security officials said.”

A truck can carry 2 or 3 tons of the explosives described, no more, certainly not 100 tons or 300 tons.  However a rail car holds 60 tons of fertilizer, a common way of transporting this material.  The problem is, there are no railroad tracks in the area and no one saw a train explode.

This explosion could have been nothing but a nuke.  Figure a ton of TNT is roughly the size of a Russian car.  Did someone miss 100 cars?  300 cars?  A small train, no tracks mind you, just a train driving down the road?



In 1996, a United States Air Force housing complex was destroyed by a “truck bomb” in an attack almost identical to Oklahoma City.  20 were killed, 19 Americans and 372 were injured.  The explosion was, as with Beirut, the “largest conventional explosion known to man.”

Not all large truck bombs have used ANFO. On June 25, 1996, Saudi terrorists sponsored by Iran attacked the Khobar Towers barracks, a high-rise building complex in a densely populated urban environment in Saudi Arabia. T tanker truck loaded with at least 5,000 pounds of plastic explosives was driven into the parking lot in front of the Khobar Towers residential complex in Dhahran. Nineteen American service members were killed in the blast, and hundreds of other service members and Saudis were injured. There is no doubt that the extent of the casualties at Khobar Towers resulted, in part, from the extraordinary size of the terrorist bomb. Reports initially estimated that the bomb contained the equivalent of 3,000 to 8,000 pounds of TNT, but a study by the Defense Special Weapons Agency concluded that the power of the bomb was actually closer to 20,000 pounds of TNT.(100 tons)


  We can talk all day about imaginary explosives that can equal a hundred tons of TNT.  We can talk ten trucks or twenty but we had one hole and a blast radius of such power and acceleration that, again, no conventional explosive could come close.  The story is almost a perfect match for Oklahoma City.


The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on February 10, 2011, With Reads Filed under Veterans. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.


  1. Jim K.  February 15, 2011 at 10:25 pm

    What’s Mr. Khalezov’s motive here? Why does he finger the Mossad? Don’t forget that the Soviets and Zionists were thick as thieves – think of Pollard. The Russians and Israelis are still crime partners of the Red Mafiya.

    • Blueyedevil88  March 1, 2011 at 6:23 pm

      What do you mean by his motive? Mike Harari was the head of the Mossad.Who is he supposed to finger,Lindsey Lohan? I guess hes just another evil anti-Semite.Zionists….lol. Are you a jew,Jim?

  2. Stevey C.  February 13, 2011 at 9:19 pm

    Gad sakes. Apologies, an’ I hope you will delete all those occidental multiple postings. Thanks ‘n best wishes, &c.

  3. Stevey C.  February 13, 2011 at 5:35 pm

    “…The evidence indicates that THE FLOORS WERE EXPLODED FROM THE TOP DOWN [empasis mine -SC] – one-by-one at the speed of a falling object. How would a nuclear device do that?”
    – (Q & A)

  4. Stevey C.  February 13, 2011 at 5:32 pm

    “…The evidence indicates that THE FLOORS WERE EXPLODED FROM THE TOP DOWN [empasis mine] – one-by-one at the speed of a falling object. How would a nuclear device do that?” (Q & A)

  5. Stevey C.  February 13, 2011 at 5:30 pm

    “…The evidence indicates that THE FLOORS WERE EXPLODED FROM THE TOP DOWN [empasis mine -SC] – one-by-one at the speed of a falling object. How would a nuclear device do that?” (Q & A)

    • J.F.E.  February 14, 2011 at 5:00 am

      One nuclear device in the basement would not do that in my opinion. But thermite cutting charges on the outer colums with a string of micro-nukes, timed to go off in succession, running down the core colums, could achieve the desired result in tandum with the thermite cutting charges.

      Bollyn’s response in toto on why nukes aren’t involved (one device in the basement):

      “I do not agree that the pulverization of the concrete was done by a nuclear device. The evidence indicates that a very large amount of highly explosive nano-composite thermite was used to demolish the Twin Towers. In my opinion, the nano-thermite had probably been applied as a spray coating to the floor pans and is what caused the pulverization of the 220 concrete floors and their floors pans. The evidence indicates that the floors were exploded from the top down – one-by-one at the speed of a falling object. How would a nuclear device do that?”

      That response does not answer all the anomalies that only the presence of micro-nukes can fully explain.

      Problem for Bollyn: Bathrooms were in the core, toilets & sinks are made out of porcelain, yet none were found, no broken pieces, not even chips, as I understand it. Thermite is more a cutting charge than an explosive charge, so, where did all the porelain fixtures disappear to? Also, massive amounts of steel, core columns, disappeared. Thermite is powerful, but it stretches the thermite “only” theory to its limit to assert that the core colums were vaporized into dust by thermite painted onto the floor pans as Bollyn asserts in his response.

      Also, Bollyn fails to explain the elevated levels of Strontiim & Barium observed & measured by the USGS at ground zero. As well as the Tritium Levels 55 times the normal environmental amount. Heat generation at ground zero for six months (china syndrome), inability to quench ground zero heat with water (thermite would not stay hot that long especially with it constantly being quenched with water, which ground zero was). Electro Magnetic Pulse (EMP) detected slightly before North tower hit by plane (remote live video news feed briefly electronically distorted at same time “boom” type noise is heard instant before plane is heard to hit building. EMP and electromagnetic plasma formation during tower destruction (exploding cars, partial burning). Melted, “hanging” skin in WTC survivor Felipe David in absence of fire. Vaporized press and crumpled steel door in WTC 1 basement reported by Pecoraro, just after basement explosion and plane impact at WTC 1. Small iron microspheres found by Jones et al in WTC dust— evidence of steel vaporization by high temps of nukes.

      Bollyn’s response is a throw away line, “pay no attention”, not a detained refutation of the micro-nuke theory, at best it only pertains to Khalezov’s hypothesis, not the string of micro-nukes running down the core colums. Bollyn in no way addresses all the facts & evidence, anomalies, supporting nuclear demolition.

  6. Stevey C.  February 13, 2011 at 5:29 pm

    Hey, I know I’ve made a few mildly impertinent comments i’ th’ past — but Bollyn’s analysis of the proposition ‘seems to me’ to be highly apposite. What say?

  7. brilmusic  February 13, 2011 at 4:31 pm

    So what happens to the perspective on Dr. Stephen Jones’ research? What about Christopher Bollyn’s? His book is pretty well documented.

  8. Stevey C.  February 13, 2011 at 2:49 pm

    “…The evidence indicates that THE FLOORS WERE EXPLODED FROM THE TOP DOWN [empasis mine] – one-by-one at the speed of a falling object. How would a nuclear device do that?” (Q & A)

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

From Veterans Today Network