Gilad Atzmon: Talmudic Logic for Beginners

12
1721

It is possible that when they circumcised Alan Dershowitz, they binned the wrong bit. Following the recent devastating chain of nuclear disasters in Japan, the lame Zionist advocate has managed to draw the most astonishing conclusion: “Israel Has the Right to Attack Iran’s Nuclear Reactors Now”

Here is Dershowitz’ fascinating, logical, algorithm for us to consider:

1. “The recent disaster in Japan has shown the world the extraordinary dangers posed by nuclear radiation”

2. “If Iran were to develop nuclear weapons, the next ship destined to Gaza might contain a nuclear dirty bomb”

3 “A dirty bomb detonated in tiny Israel would cause incalculable damage to civilian life.”

Dershowitz is obviously a complete ignorant — a ‘nuclear dirty bomb’ is not exactly something you blithely throw over the fence onto your next-door neighbour: the Palestinians in Gaza do not need a ‘dirty bomb,’ and have never expressed any desire to have one. All they want is their land back. And they would be the last to radioactively contaminate their beloved soil.

However, unlike the Jewish state that possesses hundreds of nuclear bombs and have also been using WMD against civilians, no one has managed to prove that Iran plans to produce an atomic bomb, or any other weapons of mass destruction. [1]

“Israel” says Dershowitz,   “has the right to prevent its civilians from being murdered by Iranian weapons, especially weapons of mass destruction.”

Yet, if Dershowitz’ logic is valid and consistent, then surely every Arab and Muslim country in the world should also have  the right to prevent its own civilians from being murdered by Israel’s  weapons of mass destruction.

If Dershowitz is correct, the Jewish state would have ‘no legal standing to protest a surgical attack on its nuclear facilities’, for Israel is a volatile nuclear super power that so far has refused to sign any non-proliferation of nuclear weapons treaty.

In his absurd piece, war enthusiast Dershowitz pretends to present reasonable argument: he says “this is not to say that Israel should attack Iran’s nuclear reactors now. That it has the right to do so does not mean that it should not wait for a more opportune time …But under no circumstances should the military option ever be taken off the table. Israel must preserve its ability to exercise its fundamental right of preventive self defense.”

And what about the rest of us Mr. Dershowitz? Do we also have the right of ‘self-defense’?

I think that the message is clear. The time is ripe to defend the rest of humanity from the Jewish State and its poisonous messengers. Zionist advocates like Dershowitz should, once and for all, be seen for what they really are, and rejected by our society and academia.

Similarly, Israel must be stripped of its nuclear capacity and military might. The Jewish state must be dismantled, before it is too late.

And a No Fly Zone over Gaza and the West Bank is long overdue.

 


[1] In the past I expressed the idea that an Iranian bomb would  be a desirable step towards peace. It could only deter Israel from celebrating its murderous symptoms.

ATTENTION READERS

We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed
In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.

About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT.
Previous articlePLAYBOY INTERVIEW: HELEN THOMAS
Next articleAUSSIE “PEACENIKS”…DRUMBEAT FOR WAR ON IRAN
Gilad Atzmon is an Israeli-born British jazz saxophonist, novelist, political activist and writer. Atzmon's album Exile was BBC jazz album of the year in 2003. Playing over 100 dates a year,[4] he has been called "surely the hardest-gigging man in British jazz." His albums, of which he has recorded nine to date, often explore the music of the Middle East and political themes. He has described himself as a "devoted political artist." He supports the Palestinian right of return and the one-state solution in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. His criticisms of Zionism, Jewish identity, and Judaism, as well as his controversial views on The Holocaust and Jewish history have led to allegations of antisemitism from both Zionists and anti-Zionists. A profile in The Guardian in 2009 which described Atzmon as "one of London's finest saxophonists" stated: "It is Atzmon's blunt anti-Zionism rather than his music that has given him an international profile, particularly in the Arab world, where his essays are widely read." His new book The Wandering Who? is now availble at Amazon.com