Israel’s Fingerprints Are All Over 9/11 (And I’m Not Afraid to Say It!)

Over the last week or so I’ve engaged in some vibrant email exchanges with some of the most prominent movers and shakers in the 9/11 skeptics community, most of whom are reluctant to emphasize the Israeli dimension of 9/11. While I would not publish the private correspondences of others without their permission, I thought some readers might like to appraise what I had to say.

By Joshua Blakeney STAFF WRITER

I wrote this in response to two 9/11 academics who had taken issue with me distinguishing between different states (i.e. the U.S. and Israel):

Thank you both for your responses. Here’s my two-penneth; I agree that attempting to discuss politics based on ethnic or religious distinctions is usually misguided (although the various groups which constitute the ‘Israel Lobby’ are almost totally motivated by ethnic and religious based ideologies and imperatives). But it gets more tricky when it comes to analyzing the interface between states. I think we do need to recognize that the U.S. and Israel are two different, autonomous, sovereign states whose interests often differ markedly in the Middle East. It is commonly held in international relations theory that states act in their own interests.

This is the so called “realist” school of thought. What many scholars, such as Walt and Mearsheimer, James Petras, Jonathan Cook, Stephen Sniegoski, Virginia Tilley and others, have observed is that due to the influence of a foreign state, Israel, the U.S. often acts against its interests in the Middle East. This geopolitical reality has garnered a great deal of attention from political scientists because U.S. policy in the Middle East often falsifies “realist” theory. The neoconservatives and those partisan to Israel have invested much energy and money trying to persuade the U.S. elite and U.S. electorate to view Israel’s priorities as its priorities.

One of you contended that it is better to view the world through a horizontal lens (people vs. power, oppressed vs. oppressor) rather than through a vertical lens (i.e. distinguishing between states or ethnic groups); I think we need a bit of both. Could we call this a diagonal lens? It is true that there is overlap in the intelligence community between MI5, MI6, CIA, Mossad, ISI etc. But they are not the SAME agencies with the same goals ALL of the time. The goals of those agencies converge at some points and diverge at others. Israel has a long history of spying on the U.S., infiltrating its government with agents and has even attacked the U.S. on several occasions (1954, 1967, 9/11??) often evoking the wrath of those in the higher echelons of the CIA as well as the Brzezinski faction who are schooled in the “realist” mindset of prioritizing U.S. imperial interests over those of Israel. You should check out Brzezinski’s criticism of the neoconservative movement. A good example of the U.S. putting its interests over Israel’s in the Middle East was the Gulf War of 1991 where Bush senior successfully secured Kuwaiti oil and then withdrew WITHOUT deposing Saddam Hussein. Bush, as an oil man, wanted to return to the status quo ante of stability in the Middle East rather than create the kind of ethnic and religious civil war which we’ve seen since 2003. For doing so, Bush senior angered the neoconservatives, angered Israel lobbyists (who began supporting his opponents) and angered the government of Israel. Israel always hated Saddam because he was one of the only regional threats and he supported the Palestinian resistance. This is why in Iran-Contra we see Israel channeling weapons to Iran. A strong Iran attacking Iraq was good for Israel. What we’ve seen since 9/11 is the putting of Israel’s interests over those of the U.S. non-Israelcentric elite.

I feel in the 9/11 truth movement there has been a failure to engage with the scholarship which provides evidence to suggest that the war against Iraq and the broader ‘war on terror’ was primarily waged at the behest of a Likudnik faction. This essay by Walt and Mearsheimer ignited the whole debate in 2006 and many scholars have discussed and debated the issue since.

During my undergraduate degree in Sociology James Petras’s scholarship was required reading. Thus, I was surprised when I read his books on the Israel/Palestine conflict to see that he explicitly lays most of the blame for the ‘war on terror’ on what he identifies as the “Zionist Power Configuration.” This is pretty forthright coming from a scholar held in such high regard by establishment academics.

If I am barking up the wrong tree (as alleged by one professor) I would appreciate some further debate, discussion etc. In these recent emails I’ve been hoping to edify 9/11 Studies by bringing my own readings and understanding of geopolitics to the discussion. To repeat, I think it is important we understand 9/11 and the 9/11 wars in the correct context.

I wrote this to one prominent 9/11 academic:

Thank you for your response. I appreciate you taking the time to write back to me.

Firstly, I felt that Professor X’s attempt to discredit Dr. Kevin Barrett’s vast and extensive oeuvre based on his alleged views about events in 1930s and 1940s Europe (a subject which neither I nor I suspect Prof. X are experts in) was intellectually disrespectful and thus beneath my contempt. I do believe that Dr. Barrett’s contribution to the quest for 9/11 truth has been indispensable. You are welcome to attempt to persuade me otherwise, although I doubt you would be able to.

Dr. Kevin Barrett has conducted vital research into the Israeli dimension of 9/11

[The 9/11 academic had claimed in his email to me that the Bush family are anti-Semitic]

I think we need to distinguish between Prescott Bush, his son and his grandson. George W. Bush is far from anti-Semitic. Indeed if ‘W’ was anti-Semitic he wouldn’t have been able to go to work each day because a preponderance of his foreign policy advisors were Jewish. Although George W. Bush isn’t noted as a prolific reader or scholar, his support for the Middle East interventions was compounded to a large extent from his reading and rereading of the book “The Case for Democracy” by Natan Sharanky, the Israeli minister of social and Diaspora affairs in the Sharon government who was described in the Washington Post as “so hawkish that he accused Ariel Sharon of being soft on Palestinians”. ‘W”s speech writer David Frum according to journalist Robert Novak “repeatedly refers to his own Jewishness. It is hard to recall any previous presidential aide so engrossed in his own ethnic roots. Frum is more uncompromising in support of Israel than any other issue.”

David Frum according to journalist Robert Novak "repeatedly refers to his own Jewishness. It is hard to recall any previous presidential aide so engrossed in his own ethnic roots. Frum is more uncompromising in support of Israel than any other"

One could speculate that there might be a relationship between the media promoted perception of the Bush family being anti-Semitic and the fact that Bush senior was one of the only U.S. presidents to publicly denounce the Israel lobby and stand up to Israel on several issues, including asking Congress to stop loan guarantees to Israel until they ceased settlements. Indeed, one could speculate, I repeat speculate, that 9/11 was done to prevent the political representatives of Big Oil and the detentist, isolationists in the Republican Party (who typically advocated market imperialism as opposed to military imperialism) from continuing Bush senior’s Middle East policy of putting Israel in its place and strengthening relations with Arab strongmen who might threaten Israel. Without 9/11 Israel would have ended up in the same position apartheid-South Africa found itself in. Once the U.S. empire realized it was against it’s interests to support the pariah state of apartheid South Africa it abandoned it.

You ask “who manufactured Al Qaeda?” I think we need to understand that not all Islamic patsies are necessarily connected to the Afghanistan based mujaheddin of the 1980s. We know that nearly all powerful governments in the world from China to Russia to the U.S. to Israel to Britain to France (in Algeria for example) have Islamic terror cells who work for them. I think it would be a mistake to conflate all these cells under one rubric “Al Qaeda” as the propagandists for the ‘war on terror’ did. I think it is hard to gauge the extent to which U.S. support for certain theocrats in Afghanistan is demonstrably and directly relevant to 9/11. Most powerful governments supported theocrats during the Cold War. In his book “Dollars for Terror” Richard Labeviere has a chapter called “Islamism and Zionism: Complimentary Enemies” which details the utility of Islamic theocrats in the Zionist project. Furthermore, Bin Laden himself has been quoted on several occasions, including in CNN, denying any involvement in 9/11. So why should we assume that the alleged hijackers had anything to do with the Islamic patsies who were used by the Brzezinski faction in the Cold War and afterwards in Yugoslavia and other conflict theatres? Wayne Madsen has reported that according to British Intelligence the 9/11 hijacker cells were penetrated by Mossad.

You ask:

  • Who disabled the US air defenses on 9/11?
  • Who disabled the US chain of command on 9/11?

Mr. Cheney and Mr. Rumsfeld

When it comes to answering these questions we have to then deal with Mr. Cheney and Mr. Rumsfeld both of whom are not Jewish and who are therefore falsely assumed to be ideologically different from the likes of Wolfowitz, Perle, Mr. and Mrs. Wurmser, Feith, Libby, etc. If you read Karen DeYoung’s biography of Colin Powell you’ll see that she notes that Powell (who wasn’t a neoconservative, “Israel firster” himself) used to refer to the “Cheney-Rumsfeld axis” as the “JINSA crowd” because both Cheney and Rumsfeld supported the Israel firsters’ position on most Middle East matters (Cheney was on the board of advisors of JINSA (the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs). Had the neocons not come along with grand proposals for invading and Lebanizing the Middle East Cheney and Rumsfeld would have been redundant Cold Warriors with no purpose in life. Plus, both had something to gain personally from the 9/11 wars. The fact that they had something to gain personally doesn’t mean that Cheney and Rumsfeld represented traditional U.S. imperial interests and weren’t pursing a Likudnik agenda. It just means that they were opportunists who jumped at the chance given to them by the “Israel firsters” to wage wars which they could benefit from. Rumsfeld in particular wanted to test his unconventional military strategies. As Dr. Sniegoski writes in his excellent history of the neocons:

“The neocon Iraq policy provided him [Rumsfeld] with the type of war to demonstrate the merits of his military thinking…In a mutually beneficial symbiotic relationship, the neocons praised and supported Rumsfeld, while Rumsfeld enabled the neocons to play a fundamental role in shaping foreign policy.”

Karen Kwiatkowski’s testimony suggests that the Pentagon had effectively morphed into an embassy for Likudnik foreign policy crystallizing most transparently in the Office_of_Special_Plans in 2002. The likes of Feith and Wolfowitz filled Pentagon offices full of “Israel firsters” from think tanks such as the American Enterprise Institute and the Washington Institute for Near East Affairs. So when we’re talking of the “chain of command” the unconventional operation and priorities of the Pentagon which I’ve mentioned should be considered.

You ask: Who destroyed the WTC buildings?

This is the million dollar question. I’m sure you know more about this than me. I’m not claiming to be an expert on every facet of 9/11 studies. Indeed it was Prof. X’s immediate, expedient, dismissal of a facet of 9/11 Studies which I’ve focused on that irked me. We all need to do our bit and then put our conclusions out there for others to read.

I think my attempt to get people to seriously think about who had a motive to do 9/11 and who benefitted from 9/11 is of some use. These are the sorts of questions any detective would ask. I hope more will engage with the evidence linking the State of Israel with the actual events of 9/11 which I’ve drawn attention to as well.

I listed a number of topics that imply Israeli fingerprints being on the 9/11 incident in a previous email. I adumbrated the following: “the dancing Israelis, the art students, Larry Silverstein’s Israelcentrism, the Likudnik nature of the neoconservative cabal, Mohamed Atta speaking Hebrew, British Intelligence reports that the 9/11 hijacker cells were Israeli run, recent reports that Mossad agent Mike Harari boasted about planning 9/11.”

Prof. Y characterized this evidence implicating Israel with 9/11 as “circumstantial, but it is at this point strong circumstantial evidence” he added “Josh has listed some of this evidence…there’s more.” I agree with Prof. Y that the evidence is best characterized as strong circumstantial evidence. We should remember that much of the evidence adduced by 9/11 researchers who are not hard scientists is often circumstantial, some of it strong and some of it weak. That reality makes my contribution similar to that of others’.

Prof. Y sent me some documents two days ago including one compelling article by Mark Gaffney about the former IDF paratrooper, Eddie Shalev, who gave Hani Hanjour good ratings as a pilot even though all other instructors had deemed him to be a shoddy pilot. He also sent me a document pertaining to the Israeli “art student” spy ring. He also sent me information to do with Israeli security companies at airports. I think there is indeed strong circumstantial evidence linking 9/11 and the State of Israel.

[The emailer had claimed that without providing “actual” evidence of Israeli involvement in 9/11 I was only hurting the 9/11 truth movement]

I think the evidence I have directed you to is “actual” rather than virtual evidence. I am attempting to ascertain whether or not a Likudnik faction might have instigated 9/11. One is often forced to start with the circumstantial evidence first in such a line of inquiry. This is what researchers do with the Saudi dimension or Pakistani dimension of 9/11. Are researchers of the Saudi dimension of 9/11 or Pakistani dimension of 9/11 “simply hurting the 9/11 truth movement” when they invoke circumstantial evidence? It seems even more necessary to explore and make room for evidence pertaining to the Israeli dimension of 9/11 because the State of Israel clearly had agents shaping foreign policy within the Bush administration and working throughout the North American media unlike the Saudis (other than overemphasized Bush family connections) and Pakistanis. It must be acknowledged by 9/11 skeptics that the Likudnik faction is one obvious beneficiary of 9/11.

I think I am barking up the right tree and if it weren’t for the pervasive fear of being called anti-Semitic more would be joining those of us who acknowledge the Israeli dimension of 9/11. If it hurts a “movement” to speak the truth then that movement ought to consider abandoning the word “truth” from its sobriquet.

I posted this on 9/11 Blogger in response to those who felt it was wrong for me to emphasize the reality that Israel’s fingerprints are all over 9/11 during an academic Skype conference I participated in at McMaster University:

Firstly, it is not anti-Semitic to indict agents of the Israeli government anymore than it was anti-Afrikaner to indict agents of the racist government in apartheid South Africa or anti-German to indict Nazis during WWII. If viewers of the You Tube video fail to fathom this elementary point then I can hardly be blamed for such ignorance.

YouTube - Veterans Today -

If you had bothered to watch the rest of this video you would have seen that the next time I was provided with an opportunity to speak I began to elaborate on my irrefutable contention that the fingerprints of elements within the Israeli government are all over 9/11.

According to Israeli media source Haaretz Larry Silverstein and Benjamin Netanyahu were such close friends that they spoke on the phone every Sunday

I mentioned for example Larry Silverstein’s close relationship with Netanyahu. I mentioned the Mossad agents apprehended after dubious activity in NYC on 9/11. I provided an historical context by partially adumbrating Israel’s extensive history of false-flag terrorism. I mentioned the Likudnik inclination of many neocons. I then went on to say that I wasn’t talking about all people in Israel but only certain elements who support Likudnik reordering of the Middle Eastern ensemble. I also affirmed that I wasn’t claiming that I had full evidence that Israeli agents were behind 9/11. I was merely trying to include what I’ve studied about the neoconservative movement, Israel, and 9/11 in the discussion.

I recommend you read ex-CIA asset Susan Lindaur’s recent testimony in which she provides evidence that some affiliates of the CIA were aware of Mossad involvement in 9/11.

I refuse to deny the documentary record out of fear that the National Post’s Jonathan Kay might exploit historic Jewish suffering and label me an anti-Semite. Again, I cannot be blamed for others’ ignorance.

If other scholars haven’t had the time or will to investigate or acknowledge the Israeli aspect of 9/11 then that is up to them. I’ve done my homework on this issue and refuse to shy away from mentioning the documentary record out of fear that Jonathan Kay (who is a neocon himself) will criticize me.

One owes it to oneself to read the scholarship of James Petras – who mentions the Israeli dimension of 9/11 in his books. He is one of many credible scholars who have taken the inexpedient decision to expose the Likudnik dimension of the lies and crimes of 9/11 and the fraudulent war on terror.

There are many other professors including Walt and Mearsheimer who have argued that most neocons were “Israel firsters” and that the attack on Iraq served Israel’s interests rather than the interests of Big Oil. The University of Chicago and Harvard professors wrote in this seminal piece in the London Review of Books “Pressure from Israel and the Lobby was not the only factor behind the decision to attack Iraq in March 2003, but it was critical. Some Americans believe that this was a war for oil, but there is hardly any direct evidence to support this claim. Instead, the war was motivated in good part by a desire to make Israel more secure.”

Furthermore, Dr. Kevin Barrett has done some groundbreaking work on this issue which seldom gets the recognition it deserves. Jonathan Cook’s “Israel and the Clash of Civilizations” is worth consulting with too. I think this scholarship should be considered when we discuss the events of 9/11 because the Lebanization of Iraq could not have happened without 9/11. I am not claiming that I have proof Likudniks did 9/11 but I do claim that Likudnik fingerprints are all over 9/11. I think those who really aspire to find out who orchestrated 9/11 should contemplate the vast literature which suggests that the Global War on Terror was primarily a construct of a Likudnik faction which used the political tactic of entryism to guide Republican Middle East policy towards what they perceived were Israel’s interests. In any investigation the first question which should be asked is: cui bono?

YouTube - Veterans Today -

I also posted this on 9/11 Blogger: 

Naomi Klein author of "The Shock Doctrine" argues that the "Likudisation of the world is the real legacy of 9/11"

I’m merely attempting to keep the Likudnik faction on the suspects list as we move into the important period of the 10th anniversary of 9/11. The contention that “Israel’s fingerprints are all over 9/11” seems irrefutable to me. I would like to see the individuals who constitute the Likudnik faction brought before a court of law. They are innocent until proven guilty nonetheless.

I found this interesting analysis of the post 9/11 world order by Naomi Klein yesterday. She opines:

“Common wisdom has it that after 9/11, a new era of geo-politics was ushered in, defined by what is usually called the Bush doctrine: pre-emptive wars, attacks on terrorist infrastructure (read: entire countries), an insistence that all the enemy understands is force. In fact, it would be more accurate to call this rigid worldview the Likud doctrine. What happened on September 11 2001 is that the Likud doctrine, previously targeted against Palestinians, was picked up by the most powerful nation on earth and applied on a global scale. Call it the Likudisation of the world: the real legacy of 9/11.

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on March 23, 2011, With Reads Filed under Veterans. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

41 Responses to "Israel’s Fingerprints Are All Over 9/11 (And I’m Not Afraid to Say It!)"

  1. Tahir  March 31, 2011 at 9:26 pm

    I am a Pakistani muslim, who was educated in Western New York, with a quite a number of Jewish friends. Judaism, Christianity and Islam all have common Messangers of God starting from Abraham, Solomon, David, Moses and Jesus. The political conflict only starts with human arrogance, deception and rubbish. We have to remember that arrogance started with the Satan not appreciation creation of Adam. Satan and other beings (call them aliens?) far more powerful physically than humans started with arrogance with first the Creation of Adam. Deceit and deception comes with jeolousy on misleading Eve, but that was planned to happen since the challenge was on planet earth and evolution. Remember the jeolousy and violence of Cain. I site all of this as a Muslim so where is the controversy with Judaism and Christianity? Muslims believe it will be Jesus who returns (not Mohammad) because his mission on planet Earth was completed. Although the British SIS edited the English version of Nostradamus’s predictions I think the world global culture prays for peace and elimination of violence, stable economies, and all common folk not too suffer.

    There is a distinction between Hissidic (conservative jews) and some they were exported from Europe and America. The word Zionist has entirely different meaning much as Evangelicans (an “Born-Again Christians). By concept Saint Thomas Acquinas may be deemed as a “good practising muslim”. That last word which annoys te West these days simply means as the one who yields to God. It is will be up God to judge, not the Western Governments. The biggest single enemy of the world and mankind was not the USSR, but the Neocons and Envgelicans who assasinated President John Kennedy, (the man that prevented World War-III, during the Cuban Missile Crisis). My message to the famous Dane on Freedom of expression, as a true muslim I would be annoyed with a Nord who drew cartoons of Abraham, Solomon, David, Moses and Jesus. Yes I would hate the morons who would burn the Bible, the Torah or the Dead Sea Scrolls. Jews and Christans are referred to as the “People of the Book” and not infidels as wrongly reported by Foxnews (Trashnews), Evengelican and some Isreali conjured up websites (not jewish websites). The Obama Admistration almost started another war with Korea, prior to the wonderful activity in Middle East and Africa. The evil is in Russia?

  2. Jeremy Haiti  March 30, 2011 at 6:19 pm

    Hey Moshe Sharon, take a hike. There is no place for you in this post with your disgusting propaganda. The entire world hates you freeking khazar ass and the only reason you can still be this arrogant is because the shipple in the US are still sound asleep and under the firm command of CNN, CBS, NYT and the rest, coincidentally all of them run by murderers and money worshippers like your kind.

  3. Marti  March 29, 2011 at 8:56 pm

    This whole thing is Jew against gentile. Look at the teachings of their disgusting Babylonion Talmud. How about the sermon by that looney rabbi saying gentiles were only created to serve Jews or that Jews are the only one with souls and gentiles are animals. Also the book called ‘The Complete Guide to Killing Non Jews’ that was written by another nutcase rabbi. You bet Israel was involved in 911 – make no mistake about it. One of the main things about the war in Iraq is that it was a war for Israel against one of it`s most feared enemies, Saddam Hussein.

  4. mystic  March 29, 2011 at 1:23 pm

    “only G-d knows that and He already told us what to do”
    I admire your respect in elliminating the vowel in G-d, but that’s hypocritical because most Jews have trashed the Torah and its Commandment “Thou Shalt Not Kill” in favor of the satanic Talmud written by psychotic rabbis which permits usury and the killing of non-Jews and even permits pedophila, like having sex with a 3 year old bride. By the way I was born and raised a REAL Jew who respects the Torah not the rubbishy murderous Talmud.

  5. mystic  March 29, 2011 at 12:54 pm

    Let’s not forget that they just happened to be Mossad agents, and the truck just happened to be full of explosives and that they just happened to be disguised in Arab dress. And later they just happened to be released by Chertoff whose mother just happened to be a Mossad agent.

  6. mystic  March 29, 2011 at 12:48 pm

    I have to laugh at your pathetic quaint desperation when you call Israel a “democracy”..a theocracy that demands to be be called Jewish state no less. A lawless pirate pariah racist rogue thieving fascist Nazi garrison state that plunders corpses for body organs, an apartheid state whose apartheid is diabolically worse than that in South Africa, a war criminal state as cited by a Jew called Justice Richard Goldstone.

  7. Derek  March 27, 2011 at 3:41 am

    Yawn. So much to let this supposed vet know but how I feel but why waste time on this imbecile, I shall be brief.

    So “Paul W” how do you feel about the fact Israel keeps a raft from the USS Liberty as a “war trophy”?

  8. Moshe Sharon  March 26, 2011 at 8:18 pm

    The politicians always think that they know what’s best for the Jewish people, but only G-d knows that and He already told us what to do–-fight for the land and get rid of those who refuse to live in peace. The “House of Darkness” (UN) is already stirring, demanding a ceasefire, which is another word for surrender to terror and hope they won’t hit us again. Of course, the current unnamed leader of Hamas lost no time in getting in front of the TV cameras and said, “Israel must pull out of Gaza and stop the blockade. Then we will talk.” What a big surprise! That’s what happened in 2009 and their “talk” was more rockets being lobbed at Jewish homes. [Sigh] Let’s hope Bi Bi doesn’t wimp out like all the others. No Ceasefire until there is total victory!!! More at

  9. hareli  March 26, 2011 at 9:57 am

    Even more to the point, AJHenry, is that they were celebrating and videoing the FIRST tower going down. The South Tower. That’s what no one seems to be able to get through their heads. These guys set up shop on top of that van before the first tower went down.

    So when these cretins showed up on Israeli TV, and declaimed that their sole purpose IN LEAVING ISRAEL AND GOING TO THE USA was to ‘document the event’ it was a stunning admission that should have put them in the slammer immediately. Our guys should have crawled over to Israel and yanked them back here. Our police and intel forces should never have let these killers return to Israel in the first place.

    For anyone who doesn’t believe me, watch this:

  10. hareli  March 26, 2011 at 9:07 am

    Paul W,

    Something is not anti-semitic if it’s true. Get that through your head.

    The ONLY thing that made the anti-semitism in WWII repellent is that people were being persecuted for being Jewish, for the “concept of the Jew” as Yehuda Bauer of Yad Vashem in Israel wrote in his definition of anti-semitism.

    Criticism of Jewish vices or Israeli vices is not anti-semitism. And this notion of this article stoking anti-semitism is moronic. What will bring back anti-semitism, should it appear again en masse, is covered in this statement by David Habakkuk:

    Alliance with neoconservatives has in fact been a poisoned chalice for Israel. The last thing that country needs is friends like Michael Gove, who encourage Israelis to believe that attitudes to them have nothing whatsoever to do with actions of theirs which others may find objectionable, and are purely to do with their virtues.

    Your statement To link Israel with 9/11 is like linking Germany with sour Bratwurst is particularly galling (putting aside the stupidity of the analogy) in the face of the Israelis (who were caught high-fiving, lighting lighters and VIDEO-ING the FIRST tower — the first≤/i> — going down) going on Israeli television and saying their sole purpose was to “photograph the event.” You will remember they were caught with box cutters, explosives, and between $4-5,000 in cash near the GWBridge. These guys, later identified as Mossad, spent 60 days in jail until the Israeli Embassy sprang their release.

    And I wouldn’t be wagging my finger at Mr. Duff, if I were you. He’s got a Jewish mama just like you. Surprised?

  11. 9/11 researcher  March 26, 2011 at 4:40 am

    pinning the tail on the Israeli mossad donkey for the destruction of ‘3’ buildings in NYC on 9-11-2001, gets your bank accounts seized by the U.S. Government under NSL’s issued by the Dept. of JUST US.

    it’s dangerous business pinning the tail on this mass murdering, globe enslaving donkey of the Rothschilds banking cartel.

    anyone ever notice that the Secret Service, who jumped off J.F.K.’s motorcade just seconds before the CIA murdered him, is a TREASURY DEPT entity, and hence, whether you like it or not, they work directly for the Rothschilds and the FED?

    No, I didn’t think you noticed that. Maybe next time, tune in to; “As The World BURNS”, starring Benjamin Netanyahu, his marionette, Barry ‘Obummer’ Soetoro, aka, P.O.T.U.S. (puppet in the untitled snakes), and Stephen Harper, who’s government just got tossed out on it’s ass under a ‘no confidence’ vote.

    until this mass murder of 9/11, and the ensuing ILLEGAL AND WHOLLY CRIMINAL WARS gets aired out, there will be no chance of peace anywhere.

    these perpatrators must be tried, and once convicted, face CAPITAL PUNISHMENT, as it is the only punishment fitting the global destruction and usury, and indeed, global hegemony meted out for Israel and the Rothschilds Banking Cartel that owns and operates all nations except China and Russia.

    I continue to fight on because, as someone once said recently; “you cannot kill ideas with bullets..”or in my case, threats, harassment, and persecution. All of us has a moral obligation to continue to pin this infamous tail on the Israeli / Rothschilds donkey. Or else we are slaves. What be your choice?

  12. Artashes Ashkharhakal  March 25, 2011 at 6:17 pm

    Stop the Press
    First off these Jewnited States of America is controlled by Ashkenazim Jews(95% of World Jewry are Ashkenazim) and THEY are NOT even Semitic (sons and daughters of Shem) so forget the BS, “you’re anti-Semitic if you criticize Israel”! Read the work of Benjamin Freedman (formerly Friedman, himself an Ashkenazim HONEST Jew) who revealed the background of these Barbaric people the Khazars who occupied the land between the Black and Caspian Seas, and who converted to Judaism in 740AD and were 300,000 Khazarians were mass circumcised then.

    Re: 9/11 I have been following the excellent journalism of Christopher Bollyn and you will understand who is really behind the wars, Ezra Pound and his student Eustace Mullins clearly shows the influence these hateful people force upon “Gentiles”. They started the custom of Male Genital Mutilation and blamed it on the ancient Egyptians. How can this 8 day old Jewish helpless baby EVER trust another human being. That my friends is the basis of violence, greed and of course the Greed of the Rothschilds, the Schiffs, the Warburgs who brought Fractional Reserve Banking (or printing money out of thin air) onto this planet, these “Central Bankers” corrupted, bankrupted Europe and brought it to the US via Woodrow Wilson’s allowing this to happen.

    Also Visit IAmTheWitness dot com, Keep The Truth Alive dot com and get a clue
    Watch “Missing Links” but the other so called 9/11 truth movement (Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth) Pilots for 9/22 Truth, Loose Change people, 9/11 and others, including David Ray Griffin who will never come out and say “Israel did 9/11” They are obfuscating and telling half-truths, (which is worse than telling a lie)

    By the way, the word “Jew” was NOT even included in the First English Dictionary (the Ben Johnson Edition of 1797) so its a fairly recent “concoction” Those ancient “money lenders” were Talmudic Pharisees and NOT Jewish. The original Sephardic Jews were Gypsies so these so called White Eastern European Jews were really Khazarians, so DO NOT BE AFRAID OF BEING CALLED “Anti-Semitic”

    Remember these people are NOT Semites and their land is NOT in Palestine, its 800 miles North of Palestine in Khazaria, or at least what used to be called Khazaria.


  13. Terry  March 25, 2011 at 5:41 pm

    I believe the truth of the attack on Peal Harbor is the stick used to disipline those in the U.S who would dissobey Isreal. You would be well advised, if you love your country, to leave this alone.

    The recent Egyptian civillian takeover of the secret service building should tell you all you need to know about how international diplomacy is run.

    Isreal will continue to do as it pleases and 911 will officialy continue to be blammed on Muslim extremists.

  14. brilmusic  March 25, 2011 at 3:17 pm

    That new tel-aviv appointed blogging team didn’t waste any time!

  15. Lem G.  March 24, 2011 at 10:22 am

    Its too bad ALL the assembled video tape of the Twin Towers and the Pentagon cannot be acquired under the FOIA. Little segments like a local TV news NYC traffic helicopter crew’s footage get released on a rare occasion. The security tapes from ground level at the Pentagon from several different gates and checkpoints when the
    “aircraft” embedded itself, would bring about some significant shifts in public perception about the depth and sophistication of this clandestine operation.
    Suppression of vital and telling information is an integral part of this program.

  16. john  March 24, 2011 at 9:09 am

    Derek says, There definitely needs to be an investigation into 911 for the sake of the victims families.

    i say, there will never be an investigation into 911, because i hate to say this, America people are cowards, yes cowards, why, because all you have is complaint complaint complaint, but no actions in any way, meanwhile the zionists of this world are laughing all the way to the bank. sorry to say this but this is my thought

  17. Tunga  March 24, 2011 at 5:59 am

    Follow the chain of command one step beyond Israel and you’ll find all roads lead to Rome.

  18. sharkey  March 24, 2011 at 5:41 am

    It is sad that in the USA, a Republic that is governed by the rule of law, no rule nor law was followed in the investigations. Someone has to pay for this crime.

  19. sharkey  March 24, 2011 at 5:35 am

    Sorry, that was wrong.

  20. sharkey  March 24, 2011 at 5:34 am

    “As a Jewish VietNam Vet”

    So, you are the one.

  21. kisakhani  March 24, 2011 at 3:39 am

    It had been known that AlQaida had been penetrated by Mossad.They had assumed role
    model play in Kabul in 1996 and now operate on bothsides of all the borders under
    the flagship of NATO.

  22. Go11Bravo  March 23, 2011 at 11:38 pm

    We need to make it law that governent officials and elected officials are only US citizens, that is they owe no allegience to any other country. That would rid us of thosuands of Israeli citizens working in our government. That would be a good start I think we could rally people around.

    We need to continue pressure ont he media. The left wing bias denounced by the neo cons is just a smoke screen. It is the pro zionist bias we need to expose.

  23. Nelson_2008  March 23, 2011 at 10:48 pm

    Oh I almost forgot, according to the dictionary (pick your favorite one), the most common meaning of the word “Gentile” (noun) means simply “a non-Jewish person”; which is exactly the sense in which I used the term.

    Moreover, it is not derived from “ethnos” it is derived from the Latin term

    I hope that clears up some of your confusion.

    BTW what’s wrong, you can’t say anything without putting “Zionist” in front of it?

    I hate to be the bearer of bad news, “Virg”, but the problem is Jews, not “Zionism”. Zionism is merely the latest Jewish “ism”.

    You disagree? Then find me a single prominent self-professing Jew who will publicly admit that the Jewish holocaust tale is a lie. Find me a single prominent Jew who will admit that the attack on the USS Liberty was not an accident. Find me a single prominent Jew who will admit that 9/11 was planned and carried out by Jews.

  24. vinnie  March 23, 2011 at 10:17 pm

    What more proof does the people need that ISRAHELL was involved in 9/11. The best thing that can be done IS NUKE ISRAHELL. Blow the bastards off the map.

  25. Nelson_2008  March 23, 2011 at 9:44 pm

    I agree with you that Jews were the reason that there was a WW2. If they hadn’t treacherously sold out Germany and conspired to get the U.S. into WW1, I believe there never would’ve been a WW2.

    That’s what I was implying when I said that the Jews turned WW1 into the “worst catastrophe in human history”; meaning to say I hold them responsible for the consequences that followed.

    Once WW2 started, however, it was Jewish machinations that made it worse than it had to be. I believe that if it wasn’t for the Jewish zeal to destroy Germany, WW2 could’ve ended sooner with fewer casualties.

    I was short on time and I didn’t want to write a book.

  26. Nelson_2008  March 23, 2011 at 9:26 pm

    Virg said: “Secondly, it was NOT Jews who started WWI and they haven’t been kicked out of every country they’ve been in.”

    I didn’t say they STARTED WW1, nor did I say they’ve been kicked out of EVERY country.

    Let’s start clearing up some confusion by having you not put words in my mouth.

  27. Gordon Duff  March 23, 2011 at 8:29 pm

    Israel did it.
    Your post is absurd and every word utter nonsense.
    Watch the Sabrosky videos…
    not every jew hates the united states….
    as Israel does
    oh…tell us about the USS Liberty…
    my guess…you never heard of it
    catch up….learn…or use a more civil tone to cover your ignorance
    what are you trying to do…turn the world into antisemites all by yourself?

  28. AJHenry  March 23, 2011 at 8:14 pm

    While innocents jumped from the 100th floor to their deaths, 5 Israeli spies celebrated the event, high-fiving each other, jumaping up and down, and posing for photos holding cigarette lighters. The NY Times found it “fit to bury” in late November 2001 (

  29. Bill  March 23, 2011 at 7:37 pm

    Guilt is a prepondrance of evidence beyond which no reasonable person can deny involvement-and then sort out the details..My impression of it all? We’ve been waterboarding the wrong people; Dominic Suter, Michael S. Goff, Dov Zakheim, Silverstein, Jerome Hauer, Rudy Guiliani-these guys would break under skilled, televised, cross-examination.

  30. Paul W  March 23, 2011 at 5:27 pm

    As a Jewish VietNam Vet I was somewhat perplexed with this article. Yes, I can separate Israel vis a vis the “Jews” but that’s like separating the Vatican from the Roman Catholics. Furthermore, the accusation that Israel spies on the US should not be an eye opener any more than it would be stating that the US spies on all of its allies as well as enemies, and that includes Israel.

    To link Israel with 9/11 is like linking Germany with sour Bratwurst. You have some gaul to expect that there will NOT be some folks who will read this article and add it to their ammunition against the Jews. When you come down to it, who is our staunch ally in the MidEast – and, the ONLY democracy? You have a very large pair of cajones Mr. Blakeney, and you are stoking the fires of anti-semitism whether you agree to that or not. I respect that you have the right to say what you want, and therefore you should respect my right to write and respond. I served my country just like anyone else did – Christian, Muslim, Jew,. and even I dare say, Atheist. I consider myself a Jewish American, not an American Jew. And, as a Jewish War Veteran, I find your article repulsive and disgustingly abhorrent.

    Respectfully (although you don’t deserve the respect),
    Paul W.
    Teaneck, NJ

  31. Virg  March 23, 2011 at 5:08 pm

    Let’s clear up some confusion.

    First of all, “gentile” means nation or tribe. It comes from the Greek word “ethnos” where we get the word ‘ethnic.’

    Secondly, it was NOT Jews who started WWI and they haven’t been kicked out of every country they’ve been in. ZIONIST/BANKERS started WWI and they are race that has been kicked out of every country – and need to be kicked out of the United States!

    Zionist/bankers are Ashkenazi/Sephardic Mongols and Huns who claim to be Jews. (Even the Bible at Rev. 2:9 says they are not Jews, “but are a synagogue of Satan.”) Furthermore, THEY ARE NOT SEMITES! They have no claim whatsoever to the Palestinian land, which they’ve been planning to steal – to my knowledge – since the 1800s. That was the whole/sole reason America was brought into WWI – the Balfour Declaration!

    Our young men have been dying in all the wars started by Zionist/bankers since the Revolutionary War. Even the Civil War was their doing, and the assassination of Lincoln by Zionist Booth.

    Mr. Blakeney has very courageously “called a spade, a spade!”

    16. Nazi Zionist

    1.a Nazi Zionist is a person who supports/expresses Zionism using Nazi fundamentals.

    2. a prejudice person who claims Israel is the birth right of all followers of Judaism.

    3. a person who denies the existence of Palestinians Muslims and Christians.

    4. Nazi Zionism refers to the Israeli government which is currently committing a Genocide against the Palestinian population.
    -Ethnically cleansing the land of all Palestinians (as Hitler had done with the Jews)

    5. Nazi Zionist commits crimes against humanity and gets away with and says the whole world is racist when questioned.

    6. a delusional creature, might be schizophrenic, believes the whole world is out to get him when in fact he is out to get the whole world.

    7. A Jew who brings pain to the Palestinian people/who makes them suffer and acts and commits the same acts of cruelty that Hitler committed on the Jewish population.

    8. Nazi Zionist, clearly a hypocrite.

    9. A person who oppresses Christian and Muslim Palestinians.

    10. one who drops 1 million cluster bombs on an innocent population and gets away with it.

    11. an ideology which goes unpunished with the highest # of UN violations.

    12. group that controls AIPAC which essentially controls the United States.

    13. Group that imprisons children in unbearable prisons and gets away with it.

    14. is the best liar, cheat, murderer, manipulator, evil and inhumane person.

  32. peter  March 23, 2011 at 3:32 pm

    Very comprehensive – good comments to a good article….thanks to all

  33. JD  March 23, 2011 at 2:40 pm

    Excellent piece Josh,

    You need to watch Mike Delaney’s 9/11 film Missing Links, it’s two hours long and it’s by far the most comprehensive movie to date about the Jewish/Israeli connection to 9/11. A definite must-watch, here are the links to it below.

    Missing Links ~ The Definitive Truth About 9/11 ~ Part 1 of 12

    Rabbi Dov Zakheim: The Real 9/11 Mastermind

  34. LILI  March 23, 2011 at 2:20 pm

    The Jews my dear were the reason why WW2 began! They were the staunch supporters and creators of the communist movement.

    When Jews were kicked out of Russia for trying to instigate and raise a communist movement, and drained the banking system of Russia, most came to Germany, however, since they controlled the banking and trade in Germany, soon they brokered a secret deal with the U.K to fight the Germans again, but this time the British were promised a victory by the now German Jews in return for Israel.The document still exist today.

    That is how America was allied with the British. The Jewish movement that controlled all the media,and publications in the U.S. began a anti German movement in a country that was mostly German. By brining in America they were given Israel.

    When Germany found out that it’s loyal Jewish bankers, and tradesmen had brokered a secret deal, and had begun to attack German political leaders, and it’s economy from the inside, and across Europe they began to attack the Jewish people..but only specific groups that they knew had a hand in the conspiracy to destroy Germany in order to gain Israel.

    It is interesting how Germany had always supported the Jewish communities, and no where else did the Jews live better than in the German Nation. All that turned against them when they backstabbed the one nation that had always supported them. So the Germans attacked back with hate.

  35. Dan  March 23, 2011 at 2:13 pm

    Since when is circumstantial evidence impermissible in establishing an account of the events of 9/11? Who says so and on what authority? The question is not whether evidence is circumstantial, but whether that circumstantial evidence is competent, material, and relevant; that is, that it provides the most plausible, adequate, and consistent explanation of the events. In fact, it would be hard to come up with a more comprehensive case against the Israelis and their agents than what has already been established by circumstantial evidence. The evidence regarding the dancing Israelis, furthermore, provides direct, material evidence of Israel’s involvement. To comprehend all the circumstantial evidence amassed against the Israelis and their American agents and deny that it provides an adequate, consistent, and coherent case against them is to establish oneself as part of the cover-up itself.

  36. LILI  March 23, 2011 at 1:53 pm

    I came across an interesting point recently, 9/11 is the beginning of the Ethiopian calender!

    Now Ethiopia Historically was part of Maka Kingdom that began in Sudan, Mount Sinai, and continued all along the coast on both sides of the red sea until reaching Somalia, Yemen, Zanzibar, Oman, and the Makran cost into Pakistan. Otherwise known in the ancient times as the Lahmu/Lahamu Dynasty. The Snake Worshiping Dynasty.
    Abrahamic religions have all been shaped by this particular Kingdom because they were the sea faring nation, who later became known as the Canaanites, Phoenician, from which the (Ancient) Hebrew and Aramaic as well as the Greek alphabets evolved, including religious practices, and languages.
    All of Saudi Arabia in fact was under control of the Eastern African Kingdom even until the rise of Islam. Saudi Arabia as we know them today, is a puppet kingdom of the U.K, and Druz/Jewish Nation of Israel. The Saud family from Najd, a Jewish dominated region, both in ancient history, and during the Islamic era, were not even Muslims, they are of Jewish descent. Even today most in the Arab world including historians know their true lineage, and the founder of the Wahab nation.

    The Wahab people actually come from the Druz clan, their are Druz today that still carry the last name of Wahab or Wahabi. The family name Wahab actually comes from the various Druz clans that once lived and dominated that region. Any one who knows about the Druz, could tell you that they feel at home in Saudi Arabia..Yes these are the same Druz who are not only in Syria, Lebanon, Israel, and run the Masonary groups of U.K, Scotland, Ireland..and even France.

    9/11 involves all of the nations of the Maka…which is why no one from Afghanistan, Iraq, or Iran was on that plain or cared to be.
    The date is significant, it carries with it the ancient date of Ethiopian calender..

    Ancient history dominates all of the east today.

  37. Edward Rynearson  March 23, 2011 at 12:56 pm

    The Zionists are playing this as an all-or-nothing exercise

    March 11, 2011

    Dr. Kevin Barrett speaks with military affairs expert Alan Sabrosky (Ph.D. University of Michigan, former Director of Studies, Strategic Studies Institute, US Army War College). Dr. Sabrosky who pulls no punches when he states, “I have had long conversations over the last two weeks with contacts at the Army War College and the headquarters, Marine Corps, and I’ve made it absolutely clear in both cases that it is 100% certain that 9/11 was a Mossad operation.’ Period. “The Zionists are playing this as an all-or-nothing exercise. If they lose this one, they’re done.”

  38. Nelson_2008  March 23, 2011 at 12:44 pm

    When the Jews were thrown out of almost every country in Europe, it was Jew vs. Gentile. When the Jews turned WW1 from a tragedy into perhaps the worst catastrophe in human history, it was Jew vs. Gentile. When the Jews decided that they had to destroy Germany in WW2, it was Jew vs. Gentile. On 9/11, it was Jew vs. Gentile.

    I keep trying to tell myself that this is NOT ABOUT JEW AND GENTILE, but it is. It really is. That’s ALL it’s about, unfortunately. I wish it wasn’t, I really wish it wasn’t, but it is.

  39. Nelson_2008  March 23, 2011 at 12:39 pm

    Then of course, there is the Jewish involvement in the cover-up. My favorite example is what I call the “Hymie Brown incident”, where Hymie Brown somehow got himself on National TV on 9/11, got NBC to falsely introduce him first as the “architect” and then as “project engineer” of the WTC towers. Of course, Hymie then went on to make series of ridiculous, demonstrably false statements in support of the official theory.

    When the “truth movement” began looking at imposter Hymie’s role in the cover-up, he fled to Israel.

  40. Doug  March 23, 2011 at 12:33 pm

    Excellent article, Joshua and well written. Your search for the truth is exactly what we all need to be doing. This is not about jew or gentile. This is about murder and criminal activities that go beyond what most of us can imagine. ‘Keep up the fire’, and know that many support your efforts to bring this large cabal of darkness into the light and a big courtroom. Thanks and Best Wishes, Doug

  41. Derek  March 23, 2011 at 11:54 am

    Thanks for the brilliant article Joshua. I will hold up my hands & say for a while I thought 911 false flag was just a conspiracy theory myself but thanks to brave people for speaking out I am no longer a sceptic. There definitely needs to be an investigation into 911 for the sake of the victims families.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

From Veterans Today Network