Suppressed News: “False Flag” Whistleblower Acquitted in Britain

Britain’s Largest Terror Attack Likely “Mossad/MI-5” Operation

Anthony John Hill, “Maud dib” Found Not Guilty for Exposing 7/7 “Inside Job”

By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor

The story has been censored from the American media.  Few Americans know of or remember the “British 9/11.” Fewer still are aware that a powerful legal case has been made showing full government complicity in the planning and execution of the attack and the extent the British government has gone to in order to suppress information about one of the worst kept secrets in history.  The film “Ripple Effect,” considered a threat to British “security” led to one of the most incomprehensible criminal cases in recent years.

Anthony John Hill "NOT GUILTY"

On July 7, 2005, Britain suffered its largest terror attack, what they call “7/7,” their “9/11.”  However, a wealth of evidence, much incontrovertible, has shown these terror attacks to have been something else, “false flag” terror meant to support the Blair government’s policy of continuing and even expand its participation in the “Global War on Terror.”

The 4 Muslim “suicide bombers” once believed responsible for the incident are now believed to have been recruited as part of a well documented mock terror drill scheduled for that day that included 1000 participants, some of them paid actors hired to carry dummy explosives.

YouTube - Veterans Today -

Nick Kollerstrom, author of Terror on the Tube writes:

It’s the opinion of Sheffield University social-sciences professor Ridley-Duff, that Mr Hill’s Ripple Effect’s narrative of what happened on that day, is more plausible and better fits the facts than did the BBC’s 7/7 ‘Conspiracy Files‘ program. His well-referenced study focussed very much on what happened at Canary Wharf on that morning, seeing the Ripple narrative, whereby the young alleged bombers had been inveigled into a terror drill that morning, then fled to Canary wharf where they were shot – as the best account yet.

The new 3rd edition of my book Terror on the Tube endorses this view. In contrast, the so-called ‘July 7th Truth Campaign’ has scoffed at the Ripple narrative calling it ‘evidence-free conjecture,’ a quite breathtaking (and very revealing) remark.

As part of what has been called “the continuing coverup of 7/7,” Britain reached across international borders and extradited a journalist, attempting to impose a 20 year sentence for an alleged infraction of British law that happened in another country.

In doing so, Britain has claimed the right to censor any and all communication, print, video and internet in any country around the world that agrees support extradition under these circumstances.

One nation complied, Ireland.

YouTube - Veterans Today -

After 151 days in dismal Wandsworth Prison, much of it in solitary confinement, John Anthony Hill is finally free. The crime he was accused of was the mailing of a “7/7 truther” DVD from Ireland to the United Kingdom.  Yes, you are hearing me right, he was extradited from Ireland for sending a copy of the film, “Ripple Effect,” which outlines complicity by the Blair government in terror attacks that killed 56 back in 2005, including 4 “suicide bombers” now believed by many to have been murdered in a bizarre plot.

More frightening still is the idea that mailing a DVD, available worldwide on Youtube to anyone, could be considered “perverting the course of justice.”

YouTube - Veterans Today -

Kollerstrom’s  website, Terror on the Tube, describes the trial and acquittal:

Muad’Dib’s trial started on Monday 9th May, with a challenge to the monarchy and, hence, the authority of the court. This was ruled ‘out of order’ by the judge. On Tuesday a jury were sworn in.

On Wednesday they watched all of his film, ‘The Ripple Effect’, in open court.

Over the Tuesday and Wednesday the jury heard in-depth discussions of both 7/7 and 9/11, with Mr Hill laying out clearly, and at his own leisurely pace under cross-examination, the reasons he believes that both these ‘attacks by terrorists’ were, in fact, false flag attacks by agencies of the state against its own people carried out with the purpose of providing a pretext for invasion of innocent countries in the middle east in order to control their natural resources.

This was surely the first ever fully-explored set of such allegations of false flag terror made against any state before an ordinary collection of the citizens of that state.

It is also clear from the verdict that, when such information is placed before such ordinary citizens the majority of them ‘get it.’ The jury had announced that it could not be unanimous, so the judge allowed a ‘majority verdict’, i.e. ten or more of the 12.

Hill was found not guilty, not because his actions were considered legal but rather because his testimony made a powerful case against the British government.  The jury was pressed to convict Hill but refused.  The 10 members who sided with Hill and refused the instructions of the Crown did so, out of utter shock at the powerful case Hill made demonstrating that, not only 7/7 was an “inside job” but 9/11 as well.  Hill took on both attacks and 10 of 12 jury members sided with what has been often called “conspiracy theory.”

YouTube - Veterans Today -


In a terror incident curiously time to support a political attack on the Blair government’s complicity in what has been increasingly characterized as an illegal attack on Iraq based on “sexed up” intelligence, now subject to one of the longest inquiries in British history, accusations have been made and strongly supported that place responsibility on British intelligence services aided by Israel.  Sources high in the Bush administration tell us that the 7/7 attacks were staged to coincide with a push to attack Iran from Iraq while troop levels were high.

YouTube - Veterans Today -

Hundreds of millions of dollars were paid out to militia leaders and clerics in Iraq during what was called “the Sunni awakening” to temporarily end combat there to allow for staging of the Iran attack.  More “false flag” attacks were planned, this time on American forces in the Persian Gulf, to coincide with “7/7” but were prevented by commanders in the region.  Since 2005, the groups funded by the American “payoffs” have reconstituted Saddam’s Baathist regime and have continued a reign of terror across Iraq that continues to this day.

YouTube - Veterans Today -


Kev Boyle, gives us the best look at Anthony John Hill, a man, as with so many, pushed into direct confrontation with a powerful government intent on crushing him (or her).  This was written prior to yesterday’s aquittal:

The first person to present an alternative and more credible narrative for 7/7 was Yorkshireman Anthony John Hill, in his documentary ‘7/7 The Ripple Effect’ (this is a must-see. Please watch if you don’t know the film). Hill, a very unusual character in many ways, has renamed himself Muad’Dib, after a character in Frank Herbert’s sci-fi epic ‘Dune’. It is his basically his interpretation of events that have been presented above, excepting that ‘Dib did not know of the pregnancy problems of Khan’s wife, nor about the 4.35 text-messages, nor Khan’s failure to contact his wife after leaving her on the evening of the 5th of July at the time of making his film.

When a group of ‘Islamic terrorists’, allegedly associates of Khan, went on trial for offences in 2008 at Kingston Crown Court, Hill posted two copies of his DVD to the court. One envelope was addressed to the judge, the other to the foreman of the jury. Neither DVD reached its target but shortly afterwards a request for Hill to be extradited from Ireland (he lived in Kells, County Meath at the time) was sent to the Irish Ministry of Justice. The request was successful and Hill was collected by a British policeman, accompanied across the water and incarcerated in Wandsworth prison shortly before the start of the 7/7 Inquest.

Hill relates, amusingly, that he asked the policeman in whose charge he was placed, “Have you watched my film.” The constable replied, “Yes.” “What did you think of it?” asked Hill. The PC offered a look that was wide-eyed and grim. Hill asked him, “Shouldn’t you be arresting Tony Blair and not me?” and the policeman sheepishly went back to reading his newspaper.

Hill made immediate applications for bail but was only released once the Inquest was finished.

His documentary has been copied and handed out at mosques to thousands of Muslims in the UK. Most Muslims now believe ‘The Four’ to be innocent, largely because of ‘Dib’s work. The authorities were obviously determined he would not upset the 7/7 Inquest operation by getting his film into the hands of family members, press and God knows who else. This man scares them and has suffered accordingly.

YouTube - Veterans Today -


What Britain has done or has tried to do is beyond draconian.  By the standards that Britain is calling “justice,” their reach has no end and their arrogance no limits.

Nothing said, nothing written, nothing filmed, perhaps even nothing “thought’ is protected, any place on earth.

If a case can be made to put Bush and Blair on trial for terrorist acts, Britain’s actions against Anthony John Hill makes that case.

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on May 18, 2011, With Reads Filed under Veterans. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

58 Responses to "Suppressed News: “False Flag” Whistleblower Acquitted in Britain"

  1. mullerohana  June 8, 2011 at 11:24 am

    Gordon – very interesting (and suspicious) problem I’m having. I am a member of a British blog website. I am trying to share this link with my Brit friends there, and when I copy and paste the link, there are spaces that are automatically added to make the link disfunctional. When I try to edit out those spaces on the blog itself, the spaces aren’t shown. I had to explain to everyone on the blog what to delete to make the link functional. Are things that far gone already?!

  2. David Williamson  June 4, 2011 at 2:58 pm

    I’ve read Peter Power admitted in 2009 that the “trial” company was publishing group “Reed Elsevier”. If this is correct the links are scary. The Reed share of the publishing industry is Orwellian. (up there with Murdoch’s New’s Corp in their ability to control what we know about our world). Intrestingly enough Reed Elsevier purchased “Choicepoint” in 2008. Checkpoint is the company behind Jeb’s florida voting crime that got his brother Bush II elected. If you want to “write” global history as you go along what better organisation to ask than this? 7/7 is a mere citation for them. Ripple Effect is one history lesson I am giving my children.

  3. ProudPrimate  May 23, 2011 at 2:24 am

    I can’t remember if I sent you this

  4. Ben  May 22, 2011 at 11:45 am

    Wow, you might want to write a book, it might make a great movie on the Syfi channel!

  5. ProudPrimate  May 22, 2011 at 6:28 am

    Actually, I see now, Muad is not a word, but ad’dab is, and m- is the typical Semitic associative prefix, meaning “from” in the literal sense, as muslim from islam, or Hebrew mqdm (“east”) from qdm (“rise”), hence the Greek mythological character Cadmus who brought the early, ie., Phoenician (Cadmean) alphabet. Wikipedia:

    In Arabic, مؤدّب mu’addib means “educator”, “he who disciplines/teaches manners” or “chastiser”.[6]Ad’dab or A’adaab أدب are “manners” or “literature”

  6. ProudPrimate  May 22, 2011 at 6:20 am

    One quibble: your headline misspells the Arabic male name Muad as the western female name Maud (a derivative of Magdalene, she first at Jesus’ tomb)

  7. ProudPrimate  May 22, 2011 at 5:58 am

    No doubt in my mind about this one. This is the greatest story I’ve read since 9/11. The second greatest was the jury verdict acquitting James Earl Ray produced by the noble William Pepper.

    Next thing to be taken away from us: trial by jury — obviously the people can’t be trusted to produce the correct verdict!

  8. Marc C. Daniele  May 21, 2011 at 10:09 pm

    Hey Gordon,
    I don’t know if you will actually get this or not, but I at least hope you will, and will know who I am! I am the one that has emailed you about “Homeland Security” coming to my home for some comments I had supposedly made eventhough I have done NOTHING WRONG!
    I have written you an email since your last reply, but have not heard anything back from you. Can you at least tell me if you got it or not, and if at all possible answer my questions please? The reason I ask this about you even receiving the email should be obvious, I would hope! I would like to know how Dr Sabrosky is doing, and why nothing has been done about what he has to say, if you can help me!
    I also wanted to let you know that I have tried to tell other American’s about what is going on about 9/11, etc. and the clear cut connections to Isreal! I did this on a MSN News Story recently about the Palestinians Peaceful Protest, and then how they were fired upon by IDF Forces, but as always I was attacked by “Trolls” that cannot dispute the facts about the King David Bombings, The USS Liberty, The Lavon Affair, Dr. Sabrosky, The Dancing Israeli’s, Building Seven, The owner of The World Trade Centers and his Insurance, all the ties to the US Government, etc., etc! They can ONLY attack me as a person! The next day I received an email from MSN about how my comments were inappropriate, and then deleted! Imagine that! I said nothing but the TRUTH, and I am deleted, and now at this time am unable to comment on ANY of their so-called stories, but this WILL NOT keep me from telling people the REAL TRUTH! I also mentioned VT in my comments for people to see some REAL facts etc. we are not told about in the bought and sold MSM in the US, and was told by one of the “trolls” that VT is only a Anti you know what website! We ALL know that is not true! I just thought you should know this!
    Please keep telling us the TRUTH about stories like this one, and other we will not hear about in our MSM BS!

    US Army Veteran, and Proud American,
    Marc C. Daniele
    Herculaneum, Mo.

  9. Erica Stuart  May 21, 2011 at 12:33 am

    Gordon please explain, today article states as usual “read more” but when you click it states you are not authorized to read blog??????

  10. ,  May 20, 2011 at 1:12 am

    The bombs used in the terrorist attacks were of “military origin”, according to a senior French policeman sent to London to help in what has become the biggest criminal investigation in British history.

    Christophe Chaboud, head of the French Anti-Terrorism Co-ordination Unit, told Le Monde newspaper that the explosives used in the bombings were of “military origin”, which he described as “very worrying”. ” We’re more used to cells making home-made explosives with chemicals,” he said. “How did they get them? Either by trafficking, for example, in the Balkans, or they had someone on the inside who enabled them to get out of the military establishment.”

    100% inside job.

  11. ,  May 20, 2011 at 1:07 am

    Verint Systems is the security firm that is responsible for the CCTV surveillance cameras in the London Underground rail network, and it is an Israeli company, with approximately 1000 employees.There is no footage of the four Muslims boarding the tube-trains because Verint claim that their cameras were not working.

  12. JD  May 20, 2011 at 12:01 am

    New video about Dov Zakheim and his connections to the 9/11 attacks,

    9/11 Suspects – Dov Zakheim

  13. Louise  May 19, 2011 at 8:25 pm

    I knew there would be a ‘terrorist’ attack on Britain because the British did not support the war in Afghanistan and they were against invading Iran. The attack was support to raise support for the ‘wars.’

  14. Garibaldi  May 19, 2011 at 8:21 pm

    I can’t help but wonder if Hill has ever met, or might otherwise know the current whereabouts of a certain malefactor by the name of Peter Power, who briefly appears in the 4th video at 3:55, and was certainly a kingpin of the entire botched affair.;read=118940
    Peter Power’s response to Bollyn can be found further down on this page-

  15. B.A. Gilmore  May 19, 2011 at 1:10 pm

    Very interesting videos. I remember hearing about 7/7 when it happened but there wasn’t anything else released after it happened. These videos show me we can all be used by our government. We can all be deceived by our government and that our government doesn’t have OUR best interests at heart.

  16. NadePaulKuciGravMcKi  May 19, 2011 at 10:03 am

    to our honest mates in the UK
    for those about to rock
    we salute you

  17. Duffster  May 19, 2011 at 9:45 am

    strange story there which i cannot convey

  18. Pantagruella  May 19, 2011 at 9:45 am

    The documentary shows the spokesman for the security company that ran the four training exercises that fateful day. Even he was a bit surprised that terrorists used the same railway stations that they using for the exercises. I have heard from a few sources that American security services and British equivalents are completely compromised by Mossad agents. Even NCIS has a Mossad agent working openly with them.

  19. Friends of Muad'Dib  May 19, 2011 at 8:45 am

    Gordon, we hope this finds you well and in good spirit. Thank you for this write-up and for helping alert American (and other) readers. Our website (Friends of Muad’Dib) compiled much information regarding Muad’Dib’s entire ordeal, including the evil, dirty tricks the establishment pulled, which readers may like to take a look at. In it, one will also find the Lawful reason why Elizabeth II is not the legitimate monarch of Great Britain and has no Lawful sovereignty, and why any of her (“Regina’s”) judges in countries belonging to the Commonwealth have no Lawful jurisdiction. The latter is vital info that needs highlighting and spreading.

  20. NadePaulKuciGravMcKi  May 19, 2011 at 8:19 am


  21. NadePaulKuciGravMcKi  May 19, 2011 at 8:17 am

    to our honest mates in the UK
    for those about to rock
    we salute you

  22. Frank Jr Molley  May 19, 2011 at 4:32 am

    Hi, nice write up but could you cite any other news clippings or links about the recent acquittal? And who was acquitted in the top photo in the article. And finally can you get court records about that case and post it? Thanks!

  23. ,  May 19, 2011 at 12:57 am

    The London Police claim the bombers were photographed at the Luton station, then rode the 7:40 train to King’s Cross, where they were photographed again. But according to the actual train timetable, the 7:40 train was CANCELLED that day.
    leave\ arrive
    Luton\ Kings X
    7.04 7.40
    7.08 8.26
    7.16 8.18
    7.20 8.18
    7.24 8.20
    7.38 8.40
    7.58 8.43

    Thameslink supplied ‘Actual Train Times’ as opposed to Original Timetable.

    Netanyahu said 9/11 was good for Israel,the same could be said of 7/7.

  24. jj  May 18, 2011 at 7:50 pm

    You said: “On May 7, 2005, Britain suffered its largest terror attack, what they call “7/7,” their “9/11.” I believe you meant “On July 7…”

  25. NineEleven IsAn InsideJob  May 18, 2011 at 7:49 pm

    I don’t know much about 7/7 Which incidently should be July 7th not May 7th as mentioned above.

    If you wish to learn more about the CONTROLLED IMPLOSION of Building-7 on 9/11 goto

  26. vinnie  May 18, 2011 at 7:39 pm

    Blow the crappy zionist government off the map. all governments are terriorist. ( IN FACT WHO NEEDS GOVERNMENT. ) better off without any Governments. —— PERIOD —————-.

  27. Earlaiman  May 18, 2011 at 4:42 pm

    One might hope, or pray, that this exoneration and evident “proof of Black Flag conspiracy ” in ter’rist attacks by a Government against its own people, might create a “ripple effect” in the US and clear up a lot of similar criminal and treasonous matters.


  28. Soap Box  May 18, 2011 at 4:41 pm

    May the truth prevail and the criminal scoundrels brought to trial.

  29. Brian  May 18, 2011 at 2:23 pm

    The official 7/7 London bombing is absurd. Here again, Jewish Zionist controlled media and government means the Israeli government and the Mossad can do as they please and nothing will happen to them.

    Elite Jewish Zionists have hijacked governments and media across the world. US, Great Britain, Canada, Australia and France are major pawns.

    Whenever a terrorist attack is done and blamed on angry Muslims the #1 suspect is the Mossad. Some Mossad members could admit on live television they did 9/11 and the 7/7 London bombing and nothing would be done. Oh my.

  30. AS  May 18, 2011 at 1:34 pm

    very good brian

  31. Alan  May 18, 2011 at 12:40 pm

    Nick Kollerstrom has done some great research on 7/7 and has been intewrviewed several times by Jim Fetzer on his real Deal internet radio show. Always interesting.

  32. onehaitian  May 18, 2011 at 12:24 pm

    Thank you Gordon, I have posted here on one of Mr. Lawson’s articles asking for something just like this about this great man, a true world citizen and hero, Mr. Hill. Of course you won’t hear about this on the BS, sold out, traiterous MSM, they rather talk about sex scandals and celebrities and the bought and paid by Israel US congress, senate and WH. It is beyond me that people still believe in the lies given by the US and UK government concerning 911 and 7/7 respectively. Cameras at the airport and the pentagon here did not work that day, and coincidentally, same thing in Britain for 7/7 in the tubes and buses? Give me a break. Long live the great John Anthony Hill (Mua’h Dib).

  33. Brian  May 18, 2011 at 10:24 am

    I researched the 7/7 London attack a few years ago. It seems to me the Mossad is the most likely candidate for the false flag. Netanyahu receiving an advanced warning of the attack is very suspicious.

    Due to upload/download limits on my wireless Internet I can’t watch videos due their heavy data movement. Cable Internet is coming later this year to my area. Anyways, I don’t know if the videos cover the following intriguing information about Netanyhhu, the Mossad and the 7/7 London bombing. It’s from an unknown author but I’ve read other articles that supports his comments:

    For example, initial news reports on 7/7 stated that Israel’s (then) Finance Minister and former PM Binyamin “Bibi” Netanyahu was warned in advance of the explosions [Ref. 6]. Netanyahu, scheduled to speak at the 4th annual Tel Aviv Stock Exchange (TASE) Investors Conference in the Great Eastern Hotel, arrived in London on Wednesday night and was staying at a Mayfair hotel. Original reports stated that warnings before the attacks prompted him to remain in his hotel room, and revised accounts held that he was “on his way to the hotel” when he was warned “after the first explosion”.

    It was necessary to explain why Netanyahu did not show up at the TASE conference. The original plan (of Israel and the mainstream media) was to report that Scotland Yard warned the security officer at the Israeli Embassy who in turn warned Netanyahu, a few minutes in advance of multiple simultaneous explosions on the London Underground, which were followed by a bus bombing. The simultaneity of the Tube bombings would “prove” that the attack had “all the hallmarks of al Qaeda”. When Scotland Yard refused to play along, Israel could not admit foreknowledge, leaving the original “warned by Scotland Yard before the attacks” claim dead in the water.

    Following negotiations, the UK authorities did agree to a minor rewriting of the script. A version where the three Tube explosions were spread over a period of 26 minutes, from 08:51 to 09:17 allowed the Netanyahu warning story to be revised to “after the first explosion”. With several detonations occurring after the warning, the decision to avoid the conference would have been vindicated. It was hoped that the warning story would be forgotten two days later, by which time the simultaneous Tube explosions account would be resurrected.

    Unfortunately, the new improved script still incriminated Israel. Until the bus bombing, almost an hour after the attack began, the British police believed that the incidents were related to “power surges” rather than bombs [Ref. 7] [cached]. In fact, the explosions caused power surges after rails were shorted out by metal debris.

    Efraim Halevi’s piece [Ref. 8], in the July 7 online edition of the Jerusalem Post, was obviously mostly written in advance. The two paragraphs about Russell Square and Great Russell Street were an ad hoc insertion on the day. Although the bus explosion actually took place at the junction of Tavistock Square and Upper Woburn Place, the remark about Russell Square and its being “within a stone’s throw” of 77 Great Russell Street is fair comment, since early reports did quote Russell Square as a blast site. The true historical irony was that if the bomb had exploded even closer to Great Russell Street and the bombers had been capable of time travel into the past, they might have bombed away the cause of their bombing. Fortunately, the laws of physics prohibit such time travel.

    But how did Halevi, a former head of the Mossad, know that the explosions were simultaneous, two days before the London police knew (if the official story is correct, Israel is innocent, and Israel-UK negotiations on the warning story didn’t take place as above)? This was a pre-written paragraph that should have been revised on the day, but wasn’t.

    The Netanyahu warning fiasco, and Halevi’s prior knowledge that the explosions were simultaneous, are also events that are correlated with the truth-value of Israel’s guilt. Over recent times, the world has consisted of approximately 200 countries. It is rather telling that the country whose intelligence services, famous characters and online messaging services have the most foreknowledge of terror attacks, and whose spies are caught in compromising circumstances with astonishing regularity, invariably turns out to be Israel. The latter has less than 0.1% of the world’s population, and is dwarfed by Iran, Syria, the Netherlands, Brazil, South Africa, Japan, Indonesia, etc.

    There was also the report in the German newspaper Bild am Sonntag that the Mossad office in London received advance notice of the attacks, but only six minutes before the first blast [Ref. 9] (German) [Ref. 10] (English, Google translation works with Explorer 6.0). It might be thought that these three cases of foreknowledge are really just one case, since the parties would have been in contact with each other. But that would be the case if Israel is guilty. When we set the truth-value of the theory under test to false, i.e. if Israel is innocent, the events that had a causal link to the theory and hence were explainable become unexplained, unconnected, improbable coincidence. The likelihood of Israeli foreknowledge increases with the number of alternate Israeli characters or organizations reported as having prior knowledge.

    Another interesting test would be the nationality of the company that was selected by Metronet Rail to provide a “networked video solution” to be installed in the entire London Underground. The company is Verint Systems [Ref.12], previously known as Comverse Infosys (before February 1, 2002), and is a subsidiary of Israel’s Comverse Technology [Ref. 13]. Watch for incidents at Copenhagen Railway, Montreal Metro, the Bank of Montreal, Porto Portugal buses, Brazil’s Port of Santos, Washington Dulles airport, and Vancouver International airport, which have also selected Verint networked video. The Israeli security company’s control of the software and computers involved in Verint Systems’ “networked video solution” enable multiple ‘malfunctions’ to occur at the very times and places that a Mossad operation is in progress. Hence, a camera-free opportunity to install the 7/7 bombs. Along with a massive spy network, and puppet “leaders” of government and police etc who are either bribed, blackmailed, or brainwashed Masons, the Israelis have the means and opportunity.

    We conclude that Israel ordered the Mossad to carry out 7/7 with a high degree of certainty, with the odds against innocence being a minimum of tens of thousands to one.

  34. Kelli  May 18, 2011 at 10:01 am

    Well, that’s at least ten more people (those on the jury that voted to acquit) that are awake to false flag attacks. Bravo ‘Dib! Thanks Gordon!

  35. Subvet416  May 18, 2011 at 9:55 am

    Inquiring minds might like to know that Gordon Duff was on the set of Dune when it was being made.
    “Long live the fighters!”

  36. stevor  May 18, 2011 at 8:59 am

    Thanks for the video clips. By putting together all that I’ve seen, I’m coming to this conclusion:
    We’ve been prepared for a war with Pakistan, Iran, and probably more (WWIII). It’s likely to be nuclear. By being nuclear, it will “reduce” the population to a “manageable level” (“green”). This “war” will also screw up all governments except the USA. The USA government will not be screwed up but the USA, itself, will because there will be a False Flag operation (I figure it will be “rioting” but really the CIA “terrorists” posing as rioters) so Martial Law can be declared, the viability of the USA government could be questioned, the UN could “save” us, and the New World Order could take over.
    I think it’s also quite possible that Obummer will “admit” that he occupies the office illegally but nobody will want to change “presidents” (even an illegal one) during a “war” so that will help him point out how the Constitution is “out of date” (need to be “updated”), and they can throw the whole thing out and adopt some concoction from the UN.
    Oh yeah, I think it’s likely to happen before the 2012 election, that all the “leaders” have been clued in, and that nobody will really bother to put out energy to pretend to run against Obummer.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

From Veterans Today Network