Gordon Duff is a Marine combat veteran of the Vietnam War. He is a disabled veteran and has worked on veterans and POW issues for decades.

Gordon Duff is an accredited diplomat and is generally accepted as one of the top global intelligence specialists. He manages the world's largest private intelligence organization and regularly consults with governments challenged by security issues.

Gordon Duff has traveled extensively, is published around the world and is a regular guest on TV and radio in more than "several" countries. He is also a trained chef, wine enthusiast, avid motorcyclist and gunsmith specializing in historical weapons and restoration. Business experience and interests are in energy and defense technology.

He is co-host of the popular VT Radio show Jim and Gordie Show.

Visit Gordon Duff's YouTube Channel


View Latest Posts >>>

Odd Connections: Murdoch, Wikileaks and Everything

Is Murdoch the Bald One on the Left?

No, Mr. Murdoch, We are the Ones Who Have Been Humbled

By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor

 

Murdoch seems to have his “ducks in a row,” the “fall guys” are falling, the press is showing the appropriate sympathy for a poor old man betrayed by bad employees.  Politicians in the US are lining up behind Murdoch, the curtain of silence, of course many of them have been on his payroll in one way or another, more of his “creatures,” the army of “living dead” that feed on all of us.

Of Murdoch’s “assets,” his most lethal “stinger” has been Julian Assange and Wikileaks.  Their secret love affair is subject to continual obfuscations and denials though they are the political sweetheart team of all time, a veritable “Dr. Evil and MiniMe” of journalism.

From the Guardian, a Julian Assange “love tap” threat against Murdoch, his secret patron:

Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, claimed today (July 20, 2010) he was in possession of “insurance” files on Rupert Murdoch and his global media company, News Corporation.

Assange also claimed that WikiLeaks holds more than 500 confidential US diplomatic cables on one broadcasting organisation.

Speaking to journalist John Pilger for an interview to be published tomorrow in the latest edition of the New Statesman, Assange said: “There are 504 US embassy cables on one broadcasting organisation and there are cables on Murdoch and News Corp.”

Pilger, as with Assange, another Murdoch asset, can be seen peddling war on Iran, a Murdoch/Assange/Israel/Neocon project now seemingly slipping between their fingers.  The video “evidence” is presented below.  Runtime 1 hour 48 minutes…background for when you have time.


vimeo - Veterans Today -

From Veterans Today:

AUSSIE “PEACENIKS”…DRUMBEAT FOR WAR ON IRAN

STOPPED JUST SHORT OF HANDING OUT WEAPONS…

Remember the old Hitler joke, “We want peace…a piece of Poland, a piece of France…”

To some Australians, peace has a different meaning than to the rest of us. When you get some folks together, Australia’s powerful Israel lobby, the “old line” Marxists, and the America haters, reality goes right out the window. If this represents “peace activists,” war as a business, war as a way of life, endless war is under very little threat.

The video below is recommended for only the strong of stomach or for the French who find that special “Jerry Lewis” humor in absurdity.

The theatrics are clear, carefully timed and have specific purposes:

The tone is unmistakeable, pure hate for America. The problem isn’t opposition to America’s failed policies, its the purposeful use of obfuscation to cover the root of those policies.

Murdoch is working, is spending and spending to break the connections that will break him, connections to his Jewish background, connections to Israeli intelligence and spying activities, connections to political bribery in a dozen countries, connections to an agenda that looks, more and more, like war crimes than scandal mongering.  One connection that is protected with the same vigor as his high level ties to Israel is Murdoch’s “man behind the scenes” role in managing Julian Assange and Wikileaks.

Today,  Australian Prime Minister Gillard called for investigations paralleling those in Britain.  Yesterday, she was marching to Rupert Murdoch’s tune.  She drew criticism from the masters at News Corp who are still able to “sting” in Australia.

Today, Prime Minister Cameron is explaining to parliament why he employed a criminal as one of his highest advisors.  His explanation will be no more meaningful than the apology Britain received for decades of base deception and more, so much more.  Cameron is Murdoch’s creature.

The US says it has its own plans but no one believes it, America is too far gone.  It has no will of its own, not anymore.  When the “Fox News” can of worms is opened, it can never be closed, a decade of rigged elections, millions in bribes, perhaps even ties to the Bush insiders who helped plan 9/11 and the subsequent coverup might surface.  Fox News, the “brand” Americans know Murdoch by is more than simply conspiracy theories and racial hate in the form of news.  That’s simply the ugly surface.

Video runtime, 6 minutes.


YouTube - Veterans Today -

 

Beloved Philanthropist Dame Elisabeth Murdoch with Rabbi Chaim Herzog

There will be no investigation of any consequence in the U.S.

But can we blame Rupert Murdoch, the mystery-man claiming to be the son of an impoverished Australian “something or other” and a mother “hard wired” to the biggest banking houses of Europe.

Murdoch doesn’t pretend to be a “born again” PT Barnum, not hardly.  His public persona is very much that of the villain and power mad tyrant.

Rupert, for some reason, told an Israeli audience presenting him a humanitarian award in 2009 that he was not Jewish. So I guess this is Father McDuffy here paying his mother a visit in a Rabbi costume as a joke?

Why the deception? Dame Elisabeth is revered from one end of Australia to the other for her many years of philanthropy to numerous institutions there. Why publicly deny his mother legacy?

Eye of Newt…

Murdoch kept no secrets, not many at least.  He started by pouring millions into politics.  There it is legal, somewhat at least.  Laundering bribes through book deals like the one he had with Newt Gingrich, is legal, somewhat. Congress spent decades installing the needed laxity that allows special interest money to move straight into tax free retirement accounts.  Gingrich didn’t invent the system, he just plays it better than anyone else.

Gingrich managed to survive an ethics investigation though his obvious lack of character has left him nonviable, even in American politics.

There are dozens, perhaps hundreds of ways to turn money into power, especially in Washington, home of not just congress but the FBI, CIA, Pentagon and a hundred other shadowy organizations filled with petty bureaucrats feeding on the American taxpayers.  They can write imaginary books, advise publications, go on radio or TV and mumble unintelligibly.

Gingrich is Murdoch’s “thing” his creature.   Millions have gone to Gingrich through Murdoch and the reciprocation has been epic, paid for by the lives of thousands of Americans, more around the world, paid for in, not only blood but history, paid for by selling out America’s future:

In 1994, Gingrich’s wife, Marianne, was hired by the Israel Export Development Company. This was while her husband, Congressman Newt Gingrich had just announced support for that company’s free trade zone in Israel. Gingrich had already established himself as “fair game” after a series of ethics and IRS investigations involving the GOPAC organization and its questionable financial practices. Sources:

(“Gingrich Aided Export Firm That Employed His Wife”, NY Times News Service, San Francisco Chronicle, February 7, 1995 pA7)

(“Gingrich, Critic of ‘Business as Usual,’ Helps Out Special Interests Like ‘Any Member of Congress’”, Phil Kuntz, Wall Street Journal, April 3, 1995 pA16)

Both articles, exposing the Gingrich/Israel connection were in the Wall Street Journal, a newspaper later purchased by Murdoch, a paper unlikely to carry such as story ever again.

Soon afterward, Newt was called on to aid Murdoch in an FCC complaint made by NBC. They contended that foreign ownership of Fox, Murdoch was not an American, was illegal. Murdoch then gave Gingrich $4.5 million through his publishing company, Harper Collins, to write a book. Murdoch had offered similar deals to Margaret Thatcher and other politicians where Murdoch had regulatory problems. This time, when Newt was found to be meeting with Murdoch’s lobbyists, it all blew up in his face and he was forced to give the money back.

When it came down to “splainin’ time,” Newt and Murdoch denied it all, then it came out that they met secretly on a park bench. Then they claimed Murdoch’s agent, Lynn Chu and Gingrich’s “associate” Jeff Eisenach had cut the deal and forgot to tell them about it. Rupert Murdoch got to keep Fox News and the Neocons gained control of content, making Fox the unofficial voice of Israel, the Republican Party and the military/industrial complex.

Thus began the Gingrich/Murdoch partnership which continues to this day. Sources:

(“Gingrich’s political education”, Jeff Gerth and Stephen Labaton (NY Times News Service), San Francisco Examiner, February 12, 1995 pA6)

(“IRS clears Gingrich donation that led to his House censure”, Capitol Hill Blue Website, February 4, 1999)

(Ethics Committee Drops Last of 84 Charges Against Gingrich ,By Curt Anderson (Associated Press), Washington Post, October 11, 1998, Page A13)

“Use of Tax-Exempt Groups Integral to Political Strategy”, by Charles R. Babcock, Washington Post, January 7, 1997, Page A01)

(“Jump-Start: How Speaker Gingrich Grabbed Power and Attention So Quickly”, Wall Street Journal, January 19, 1995 pA1

(“The Inner Quest of Newt Gingrich”, Gail Sheehy, Vanity Fair, September 1995 p147 “Gingrich, Murdoch reveal lobbyist’s role at meeting”, Katharine Seelye (NY Times News Service), San Francisco Examiner, pA1 “Murdoch, Gingrich Admit They Talked”, San Francisco Chronicle, January 13, 1995)

(“The Mysterious Mrs. Newt”, Martin Fletcher (London Times News Service), SF Examiner, January 15, 1995 pA4 “Newt’s Near Misses”, Ron Curran, The Bay Guardian, January 11, 1995 p10)

(“Newt, Inc.”, Dennis Bernstein, Bay Guardian, February 1, 1995 p19)

With the new Supreme Court ruling making unlimited corporate contributions acceptable, in reality, of course, legalizing bribery of public officials on an unprecedented scale as a form of “free speech” (money talks), Murdoch has ramped up his efforts, openly buying politicians.  Murdoch money may have purchased, during our last congressional election, 125 seats.  With 480 members of congress “sworn” to support Israel, right or wrong, no matter the cost to the United States, is this same list also Murdoch’s list?  How many are owned, borrowed or rented, maybe blackmailed?  Do they trade like baseball cards, do they spoil if not refrigerated after opening?

The court that “elected” Bush based on “equal protection” allowed corporations feudal rights in America under “freedom of speech.”  What better nation could Murdoch put under his greasy thumb.

Whatever has been done, is done, half of Washington is on a hidden payroll of some special interest group, invariably one filled with bad intentions for the United States, and uncovering the real “Murdoch” may be the key toward breaking this process down and beginning to reassert American influence in Washington.

He has been caught.  Now he fights to break the “connections.”  Murdoch isn’t “Murdoch,” he is a conspiracy within conspiracies, he is political parties, he is a law onto himself, he is, to the weak and fearful, the voice and presence of the creator of the universe himself.

He has chosen to “rule in hell,” and rule he does.  As for “hell,” he brought it with him in his bag of tricks.

Wiki-Hacking

What was called “hacking,” really “spying,” has turned out to be a major national security scandal in Britain.  This week, the head of Scotland Yard resigned because of bribery issues as did their chief of counter-terrorism.  This sure as hell doesn’t sound much like the usual naughty sex and celeb gossip the newsies are trying to color this as.  Is someone ever going to ask why the head of Scotland Yard’s counter-terrorism unit got burned for dealings with a simple smut publisher?  We are supposed to accept that, and put our heads back into the sand?

Of course, it isn’t just Murdoch and Newcorp/Fox that is dirty here.  It’s all of them.


I am surprised no one has made the tie in yet.  Where has Wikileaks gone?  Isn’t poor Julian Assange, secret protege of Rupert Murdoch, still under “house arrest” somewhere?  Fox News had a role early on, building the credibility of Julian Assange as a “hacker” and “enemy of the state” though Assange prove to be everything but.

What did Fox do? It orchestrated attacks, half hearted at best, against Assange, using New Gingrich, Murdoch associate (as is Assange) and Bill O’Reilly, next to Sean Hannity, the saddest part of the Fox “humbug” stable of talking heads.

This, in itself, isn’t enough.

  • Fox is “Islamophobic”…and Wikileaks material continually bashed Arabs and, in particular, Pakistan
  • Fox protects Israel and so does Wikileaks, perhaps more than that:

“Assange met with Israeli officials in Geneva earlier this year and struck the secret deal. The Israel government, it seems, had somehow found out or expected that the documents to be leaked contained a large number of documents about the Israeli attacks on Lebanon and Gaza in 2006 and 2008-9 respectively. These documents, which are said to have originated mainly from the Israeli embassies in Tel Aviv and Beirut, where removed and possibly destroyed by Assange, who is the only person who knows the password that can open these documents, the sources added.”

  • Fox (except for a short period in late 2010) opposes any new investigation into 9/11.  Julian Assange is a powerful opponent of a new and open investigation of 9/11 for “reasons unknown and unknowable.”

“More importantly, Wikileaks has never had a document mentioning the 9/11 investigation, the controversy over the “9/12″ secret flight to Israel or the “dancing Israeli’s,” the 5 Mossad agents arrested on the George Washington bridge on 9/11 in a van with 2,000 pounds of explosives. This group, admittedly “documenting” the 9/11 attack for the Israeli government was kept in custody for 10 months and only released after diplomatic wrangling and a major lobbying effort.

Hundreds of cables were generated by this issue and thousands, perhaps tens of thousands, tied to 9/11. All magically disappeared at the hands of Julian Assange whose public statements on 9/11 now make him suspect.Fox supports an attack on Iran, something also openly supported by Julian Assange.  Iran had been a continual target of Wikileaks.

  • Fox has continually called for an attack on Iran.  Assange has supported this position and Wikileaks has been filled with “seeded material” condemning Iran.  This made Assange more good friends along with his “pretend” enemies:

“Following the leak (and even before), Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a press conference that Israel had “worked in advance” to limit any damage from leaks, adding that “no classified Israeli material was exposed by WikiLeaks.” In an interview with the Time magazine around the same time, Assange praised Netanyahu as a hero of transparency and openness!”

  • Newscorp/Fox’s downfall hasn’t been charges of “hacking.”  The real crimes that were covered up were tied to blackmail and corruption.  The new crimes are simply the bribery used to cover the old crimes.  Newscorp has been about blackmail, political blackmail.  Here, Wikileaks and Murdoch parallel, leaks leaked and leaks not leaked.  When Assange “withheld” or “censored” material, what was the reward, the “tit for tat” as it were?  Who collected?  Who or what was the organization that built Assange, the “heroic figure,” always photographed like Mussolini, from nothing?  Only Murdoch has that power, has the “moral laxity,” now well established, for such an “operation.”

The current scandal, initially spying or “hacking” and now public bribery, top officials for some reason, centered around, not “gossip” but terrorism, resignations from officials tied to the investigations of the 7/7 bombings in particular, has clear national security implications for Britain and, of course, the United States.

Is Wikileaks connected somehow?  We think so.  For those who have forgotten, this is the cover story of why Wikileaks was discredited;

Assange was found to be working directly with major papers, the New York Times, the Guardian, and others.  Items that were “unfavourable” to Israel were edited out.  Other items, as we learned from Zbigniew Brezenski, were “edited in” or “seeded.”  These items were false, planted by a national security agency, which we tracked to Israel.

Reports have come in today, tying Wikileaks founder, Julian Assange, directly to Israeli intelligence and “Israel friendly” media outlets. We are told Assange, while at a Geneva meeting, agreed to allow Israel to select or censor all Wikileak output.

Despite the dramatic arrest of Julian Assange for rape, a story long hyped by the media, Assange “the martyr” now appears to be Assange “the Israeli spy.” Reports from inside Wikileaks differ greatly from the image presented by the press, an Assange tied to ultra-nationalist Israeli groups, an Assange with an extremist agenda, an Assange who sees himself as a geopolitical player, willing to censor, willing to fabricate and willing to betray.

On the Brezenski interview with Judy Woodruff that helped Wikileaks implode:

ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI: But I think the most serious issues are not those which are getting the headlines right now. Who cares if Berlusconi is described as a clown. Most Italians agree with that. Who cares if Putin is described as an alpha dog? He probably is flattered by it.

The real issue is, who is feeding Wikipedia on this issue — Wiki — Wiki — WikiLeaks on this issue? They’re getting a lot of information which seems trivial, inconsequential, but some of it seems surprisingly pointed. …The very pointed references to Arab leaders could have as their objective undermining their political credibility at home, because this kind of public identification of their hostility towards Iran could actually play against them at home.

Editor’s note: The use of the term, “pointed” is key. This indicates two classes of information and also begins building a hypothesis to support “intent.” If there is “intent” in the leaks, then they are an intelligence operation, not a leak.

It’s, rather, a question of whether WikiLeaks are being manipulated by interested parties that want to either complicate our relationship with other governments or want to undermine some governments, because some of these items that are being emphasized and have surfaced are very pointed.

And I wonder whether, in fact, there aren’t some operations internationally, intelligence services, that are feeding stuff to WikiLeaks, because it is a unique opportunity to embarrass us, to embarrass our position, but also to undermine our relations with particular governments.

Editor’s note: Brzezinsky goes exactly there, indicating his belief that Wikileaks is tied to an intelligence agency. This is a full and direct challenge to the credibility of wikileaks showing no reservations whatsoever.

For example, leaving aside the personal gossip about Sarkozy or Berlusconi or Putin, the business about the Turks is clearly calculated in terms of its potential impact on disrupting the American-Turkish relationship….the top leaders, Erdogan and Davutoglu and so forth, are using some really, really, very sharp language.

JUDY WOODRUFF: But this is 250 — it’s a quarter-of-a-million documents.

ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI: Precisely.

JUDY WOODRUFF: How easy would it be to seed this to make sure that it was slanted a certain way?

ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI: Seeding — seeding it is very easy. I have no doubt that WikiLeaks is getting a lot of the stuff from sort of relatively unimportant sources, like the one that perhaps is identified on the air. But it may be getting stuff at the same time from interested intelligence parties who want to manipulate the process and achieve certain very specific objectives.

Editor’s note: Brzezinski’s assertion is that “chickenfeed,” things off the news, low level “junk” intel is being “seeded” by an intelligence service to serve an agenda with “very specific objectives.” Can anything be more clear?

STEPHEN HADLEY : The — what we know or what has been said publicly is it looks like a data dump through a pretty junior-level person. So, in terms of that material, it looks like a data dump. Generally, in Washington, I have had the rule that, if there are two explanations, one is conspiracy and one is incompetence, you ought to go with incompetence. You will be right 90 percent of the time.

Editor’s note: The Obama administration withdrew the AIPAC spying convictions when it was clear that Stephen Hadley would be put on the stand by the defense. Hadley’s very close relationship with the defendants in this spy trial brings up a number of interesting questions which are not hard to answer if you read his response above.

ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI: But, Steve, the other foreign intelligence services don’t have to wait for me to make that suggestion. I think they can think of it themselves, particularly

Why Tie Them Together At All?

Would you allow a 4 year old to have a loaded gun?  If you were a prime minister or president, there are ways you could be “encouraged” to do pretty much exactly that.  What we have been doing, we being the press, we being too many of the public, we have been allowing that 4 year old to walk among us, Glock in hand, picking one of us off every so often, silent as long as we were allowed to go our merry way.

When the British Parliament lets Murdoch off the hook, not even a hand slap, when Attorney General Eric Holder walks away from the investigation of Fox News that was requested by the few remaining “clean” members of congress, we will have only given that 4 year old a bigger gun.

As the world closed in on Assange, his powerful protectors, Dershowitz and the unseen others, raised their finger on his behalf.

Was it Murdoch pulling his strings and, if so, who is the real master puppeteer?



The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on July 20, 2011, With Reads Filed under Veterans. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

46 Responses to "Odd Connections: Murdoch, Wikileaks and Everything"

  1. Peter Wakefield Sault  July 21, 2011 at 5:49 pm

    “In 1994, Gingrich’s wife, Marianne, was hired by the Israel Export Development Company”

    The president of which was one LARRY SILVERSTEIN.

    Small world, innit?

  2. tony_opmoc  July 21, 2011 at 10:49 am

    Sky News appear to have shaken off Murdoch – and are now doing real investigative reporting from Libya. I find this very encouraging.

    “West Ignoring Rebel War Crimes, Claim Civilians Fleeing To Tripoli’ In Libya”

    By Sky News

    Video Posted July 21, 2011

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-Juh1IGBUc

    Tony

    • Gordon Duff  July 22, 2011 at 5:21 am

      tony
      you missed this one
      israel is orchestrating the news attacks on the rebels
      some of our friends are helping them
      hope it helps pay the bills

    • tony_opmoc  July 22, 2011 at 2:05 pm

      Gordon,

      Now that doesn’t surprise me. Before the Libyan thing actually kicked off, some prominent right wing UK journalists who have always been very supportive of Israel – were dead against it – and even Obama and the rest of the US Military Establishment seemed far from keen.

      I admit it is all extremely confusing, and I fail to understand the logic.

      Check out the UK Daily Telegraph now for the photo of a woman today in the Oslo bombings.

      Look at the photo very closely – and draw your own conclusions.

      It helps if you have done a lot of photography and have witnessed your daughter and her friends from film school using fake blood in the back room of your house when you are away. They never manage to completely clean up the mess – so you know what they have been up to.

      The AK47 African Ape thing was great – but the Fox “watermark” kind of gave the game away. Most people don’t notice things like that.

      Tony

  3. Tom Valentine  July 21, 2011 at 10:24 am

    Machiavelli would love this; not only are the hopelessly dismal peasants confused, but now pundits and blog responders are in the thick of the confusion game. The whole idea has been for the money elites to manipulate until we crumble into a whipped puddle begging to be saved from “it all” by some cockamamy Messiah. We, the people have never been in charge of anything, and we aint seen nothing yet; Just wait till the next Messiah comes down in a holograhic glory and “saves us” The price people are paying for trampling on the words of the true savior. Palin, Bachmann and the ilk of the neocon Zionists have not upheld Christ any more than Hollywood, MTV plus evil Fox news pundits have. What was so hard about letting truth set us free, and learning to use our minds?

    • Anthony Clifton  July 23, 2011 at 7:59 am

      It is simply too easy, and LOVING YOUR NEIGHBOR, LIKE KNOWING TRUTH is of course “Anti-Semitic”. The {faux}word anti-semitic like the word “JEW” are fairly recent additions to the lexicon; Some people have such a convoluted/inverted perspective on “Reality” [TRUTH] they simply cannot “UNBELEIVE” a lie, to Know Truth…a paradox or conundrum {manufactured to mystify or mentally handicap BRAINDEADGOY/Jew Worshipping morons…like Peter Sault}? “The paradox concerning the nature of objective validity is by design and degree instinctual”…Jews will never be Israel simply because Israel has never been “Jewish”. Which Israelite in the Old Testament had a Talmud & Hated Jesus ? .If there is no history of the Children of Israel, as Peter claims {flasely} then there is no reason to know the truth that the “JEWS” don’t want people {Israelites/White people} to know…..Just repeating “JEWISH” lies, PETER, not only makes you stupid, it proves your a “JEW WORSHIPPER”…way to go !!! So tell me Peter, who put the explosives in the Murrah Building, and the WTC ? the tooth fairy ? Santa Clause, The Easter Bunny ? Who has a “JEWISH” state called Israel ? Al Quida ? How many “WHITE MEN” are there in the FIRST WORLD countries/Nations, that could given access to TRUE INFORMATION put a stop to Global Insanity…”Jew Worshipping” {Moneychangers/Freemasons…”Jews”?} Printing currency & Owning the Media doesn’t confer “AUTHORITY”, and will never change the TRUTH…800 million braindeadgoy watching Talmudvision and repeating every “JEWISH” lie ever manufactured by the stool Sculpture deity cult will never alter or change the TRUTH. Project Bluebeam , . {who Owns the Space StaTion ?} The Braindeadgoy ?

    • Peter Wakefield Sault  July 25, 2011 at 5:37 pm

      Logic isn’t your strong point, is it, Anthony?

  4. Alexander  July 21, 2011 at 9:09 am

    Gordon,

    If we go back to one of the pivotal events, GORE vs. Bush, in November 2000? What role did Murdoch plat in the set-up of Bush being placed in office. Check this out if you haven’t read it already:

    ***********************************************************************************************************************

    Murdoch’s Minions Helped Steal 2000 Election for Bush

    Great Article From : opednews.com 7/21/2011

    The same Rupert Murdoch Fox team headed by network boss Roger Ailes not only helped fan the flames for the invasion of Iraq. It was necessary first to install the right trusted neoconservative team in the White House and this was accomplished through stealing the election for George W. Bush.

    With Florida regarded as the crucial state that would provide the election winner and keys to the White House in 2000, the Republican team had a trump card in place with Bush’s younger brother Jeb serving as Florida’s governor. By scrubbing numerous minorities legitimately qualified to vote from voters’ lists on grounds that they were felons, the Bush clan felt it was in good shape where the Sunshine State was concerned.

    As the Bush brothers and father sat in their hotel suite election night, shock waves emerged when it was announced that Florida had been projected into Gore’s column. Shortly thereafter a first in presidential election politics occurred. The three Bushes were shown in their suite. An obviously pre-arranged script was followed and it was simple enough that even George W. was able to follow it.

    The snippet began with candidate George W. warning that their best evidence, meaning the calculations of brother Jeb, revealed that they would win Florida. To provide evidence on why caution was needed, former President George H.W. Bush reminded his presidential candidate son that the networks had forecast a loss to Bill Clinton in Florida in 1992. Father and son sought to convince viewers that the Bush patriarch’s nugget from his last political race was occurring in direct response to his son’s warning about calling the Florida race prematurely.

    Later the Bush message conveyed by foot soldier John Sununu and others, who noted that their hated adversary Dan Rather of CBS had called the race first, registered with their best self righteous anger tones that votes had not yet been counted in the northernmost section of the state beyond Tallahassee and into the beginning of the Central Time Zone. Since God fearing Christians lived there, the announcement of Rather and later commentators threw a pallor of gloom over them and they went home rather than voting, which they assuredly would have done otherwise.

    The complaint carried the contradictory stigma so ingrained in the far right. After all, if these ardent Republicans from the rural northern tip of Florida were true believers, were they not convinced that the networks were part of a vast left wing media conspiracy?

    Was this factor not enhanced by the fact that implacable enemy Dan Rather, whose reporting helped bring down Richard Nixon, had made the initial call for Gore?

    If reporting from the left wing conspiracy is not to be believed then why were these committed Republicans so willing to accept the projection of Gore winning Florida?

    After a long nail-biting evening of twists and turns a win projection was delivered. It came from Fox News, the sole network of reliable reporting to Republican right true believers. It was Fox that had hammered home relentlessly the Karl Rove promoted theme that character was the election’s deciding issue with George W. Bush standing superior to Vice President Al Gore in that vital area.

    Never mind that Bush by his own admission had been a heavy drinker until he was said to reform at age 40. He had also been an admitted sexual carouser in early adulthood. Bush had not only received a coveted position in the Texas National Guard through his father’s heavy influence while Gore had served in the Army during the Vietnam War. He had also bolted National Guard duty.

    The presidential call made by Fox was unsurprisingly for Bush, but there was an important additional element. Working the call desk that evening at Fox was John Ellis. He was not a household name that would send ripples of shock throughout America.

    There was an all-encompassing element involved in Fox boss Roger Ailes, who cut his teeth in politics working as a media consultant in Richard Nixon’s first winning presidential campaign in 1968, assigning John Ellis to such a strategically sensitive election night post. Ellis happens to be George W. Bush’s cousin.

    Once that the Fox projection engineered by Cousin John Ellis was made a ripple effect promptly emerged. The other networks followed the Ellis directed Bush projection.

    When Gore observed the trend he called Bush to congratulate him and was set to deliver a concession speech. Some alert staffers, after carefully observing Florida returns, concluded that there was no basis for the Ellis generated projections. Gore was actually blocked from entering the stage so he could be told that a concession would be premature and potentially harmful.

    The response from Bush when Gore called him to reveal that he would not concede after all was a snippy response that his brother Jeb had assured him that he had won. Gore asserted that Jeb Bush was not the deciding authority. Gore was almost certainly unaware of it at the time, but a Bush relative assisted by Roger Ailes and Fox had emerged as would be election decider regarding presidential projections.

    Ellis’ election night call gave Bush a decided psychological edge. It gave voters in general the idea that the Republican was president-elect or close to that pinnacle. Gore was seen as the challenger with Bush the leader. The Rove driven forces pushed this idea forcefully.
    Like

    • Smitty  July 21, 2011 at 11:01 am

      That’s interesting. If Gore won the election, there would not be enough neocons in the the defense and justice departments to orchestrate and cover up 9/11. They also wouldn’t have been there to convince anybody to go to war with Iraq based on their Feith-written grade school propaganda and false intelligence. Even with Jewish Lieberman as a VP, things would’ve been a lot different. At least until 2005. This agenda was in the making since the late 70s. For 8 years it sat incubating during the Clinton era, otherwise we might’ve had a 9/11/93 followed by an invasion of Iraq in ’95

    • Denys Picard  July 21, 2011 at 1:10 pm

      With your insight I guess that history will remember Murcdoch as a hate monger and Barack as the man with the beautiful smile. Viva sodomia!

      Murdoch has taken control of politics, he and all of the Jewish MSM. If you think we are not getting the same crap no matter who occupies the white house, welcome delusion!!! (But then again, if you are jewish, homosexual, black, or a minority, you have been getting gifts for 30 years.)

    • Peter Wakefield Sault  July 21, 2011 at 6:09 pm

      “Beautiful smile”? In the eye of the beholder, I guess. To me he looks like the guy from ‘Mad’ magazine.

  5. Denys Picard  July 21, 2011 at 5:48 am

    Gordon,

    Some of the work here is great, I personally always held the view that Assange was a mole, that he should not be trusted, that he was heavily Zionist bias and had a highly gay and lesbian agenda.

    That is why, when I see the picture of minime and Dr evil, I see Murdoch on the right and Assange as minime.

    But, what surprises me the most is that in your passion to support the Democrats you flamboyantly put Murdoch as a strait Neocon only. Sometimes people seem to have very short memories. Don’t you remember that Murdoch supported Hilary Clinton as a presidential candidate? That is Hilary, the categorized extreme lefty, over Obama, whose campaign ideology appeared lefty yet whose senatorial record was central left and a blue dog or conservative demeanour. Now, Obama is just a Zionist.

    Yet Murdoch is very fond of Obama. And he was very fond of George Bush. Murdoch only cares about what is good for the Jews and the NWO; and all of Main Stream Media also. Barack has a MWO agenda, and look at the propositions we have on the republican side, its a contest to who can brush out the best essay of “How I have always wanted to be a Jew and live in Israel”; this is true from Romney to Bachmann. While I am happy of the events that are occurring around Murdoch, it should be the opportunity to see how all the Jewish held MSM are the same as News Corp. So we should not let Murdoch and News Corp get away with this, and we should use the momentum to do the same with all of the Jewish owned Western Medias.

    And look at Barack now, don’t you think that in all honesty, he looks more like a Neocon than anything else. You know that Neo-Conservatism is a Jewish created intellectual and political movement.
    On this, because most people believe it is a Christian initiative, if you really want to know how we are being fooled I suggest you read: “Understanding Jewish Influence III: Neo-conservatism as a Jewish Movement” by Kevin MacDonald. You can get a copy of it at his site http://www.kevinmacdonald.net, you go in the section -Essays on Jews and other Diaspora people- at the bottom of the page you will see a heading NEOCONSERVATISM. It’s the second text.

    Take care,

    Denys

    • Sally  July 21, 2011 at 10:55 am

      Am just listening to a Jewish radio host mocking the USA and am struggling with all my might not to send an abusive e-mail- which would likely see me arrested.

      What didn’t help was this article that i’d come across re Is Being Anti White Good for Jews.

      In the case of multiculturalism and the White minority future, Jews are actively making alliances with non-Whites. That strategy, maintained by media control and a huge ethnic infrastructure of activist organizations like the ADL and the SPLC that function to police and pathologize White advocacy, is working very well. It’s not obviously irrational, although Jews like Steven Steinlight have doubted the wisdom of admitting Muslim immigrants (see previous link).

      In any case, whether supporting Israel and supporting massive non-White immigration and multiculturalism are rational strategies is fairly irrelevant given the intense emotions involved. The Israeli government is in the hands of the extremists for whom turning back on the territorial gains of the 1967 war is unthinkable. And American Jews, with their lachrymose view of Jewish history, simply can’t get over their fear and loathing for the West.

      But it must concentrate the minds of Jewish activists to realize that Jews like Charles Bloch are openly acknowledging the Jewish role in the destruction of the West. When multiculturalism is eventually seen by the great majority of honest, intelligent Westerners as a cataclysmic disaster—as I think is inevitable, then it’s a short step to look for whom to blame. And at that point, charges of “virulent anti-Semite” will fall on deaf ears.

      http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2011/06/charles-bloch-is-being-anti-white-good-for-the-jews/http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2011/06/charles-bloch-is-being-anti-white-good-for-the-jews/

      Reply.

      Heather Blue July 2, 2011 – 1:35 pm | Permalink Is anti white good for the Jews?

      Well, they must think so since they developed an agenda to exterminate us. Jews have just about ruined America. They have nearly ruined Europe. We can give their agenda names like Zionism, Marxism, Leninism, communism, perhaps even liberalism, etc., and point out the terrible influence on the west, but the truth is we are dealing with a Jewish agenda of white genocide. It’s brutal and real. We are struggling with it not knowing exactly what it is or what force is behind it.

      Those who are aware seem to be looking at the Jew’s agenda piece meal, bits and pieces of the parts, plans, components and strategies of the agenda when we should be looking at it as a whole….all rolled up in one extensive package. It is brilliant, certainly clever and efficient.
      Taking on one issue at a time does not seem to be serving our interests. Why don’t we just call it what it is – the Jewish agenda and deal with it. It is imperative for us to take on the whole ball of wax and nail the Jews to the wall.

      No group anywhere has an agenda like the Jews. Other groups do not plot and plan to wipe out an entire race of people and their culture. They don’t have that kind of hatred. Jews can incite them to resentment by making them believe we hate them – it’s part of the strategy in the agenda – but, on their own, non-Jewish groups are not that low and evil. We’ve never had an agenda like that although the Jews scream about a holocaust – which is also part of their agenda to present us as having motives we do not have and to keep the rest of the Tribe on the job.

      Nothing excuses the Jew’s agenda to destroy us.

      There are some very interesting comments from the USA.

  6. Project Humanbeingsfirst.org  July 21, 2011 at 12:48 am

    “Was it Murdoch pulling his strings and, if so, who is the real master puppeteer?”

    Is that really such a big mystery?

    What’s the overarching agenda behind all these puppetshows?

    If you can name that agenda, then you can ask cui bono and there you have the answer.

    But you knew that.

    Murdoch is but a dishwasher in that overarching scheme of things. Assange is merely a distraction to draw public attention on the left field while the real game is played on the right field.

    Zahir

    • Smitty  July 21, 2011 at 10:52 am

      That’s why even if Murdoch is ousted not much will change. Things may appear to changed, but the real puppet master(s) has no face.

      When Andy Kaufman went through his professional wrestling phase he had an ongoing feud with Jerry Lawler. The feud was staged, the two were actually friends in real life. Obviously professional wresting itself is fake. That’s what we have with Assange/Murdoch. It’s also what we have in Washington. Republicans and Democrats disagreeing over minor pointless stuff when they’ve all pledged allegiance to Israel and the wars we fight for Israel that have destroyed our economy.

  7. Erica Stuart  July 20, 2011 at 10:48 pm

    Given the conditions in which we find our self now as a result of our innocent stupidity and gullibility, all I concentrate to determine a target is “who benefits” With Murdock I like to look behind the curtain, who really benefits, is he just part of an organic polyp with tentacles reaching out all over. Gordon would know exactly what I mean. Murdock, Koch brothers etc etc. all seem to be working on the same thing, getting rich along the way to get the power they need to buy prostitute Congresspeople. And then I look at our self, and while I am an Agnostic Catholic I remember the good book saying the serpent will work on your weaknesses to lure you to sin…” You can kill the serpent for sure BUT, that that make our bastard who sold our country into angels again.?

  8. wallytron  July 20, 2011 at 5:59 pm

    I just bought the Wall Street Journal from Murderer for 26 beads

  9. eileen fleming  July 20, 2011 at 5:40 pm

    BEFORE Assange and Manning there was Vanunu Mordechai:
    http://www.wearewideawake.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1997&Itemid=244

    On March 26, 2006, during one of my 7 trips to Jerusalem, Vanunu told me:

    “Many journalists come here to the American Colony, from CNN and NY Times. They all want to cover my story, but their EDITORS say no…CNN wants to interview me; but they say they can’t do it because they don’t want problems with the Israeli censor. BBC is doing the same thing. Sixty Minutes from the United States from the beginning they wanted to do a program, but because of the censor situation they decide not to do it. Also big media from Germany, France, Italy, Japan. None of them wants problems with the Israelis.”

    I was NOT a reporter until AFTER I met Vanunu for the first time in 2005 but I HAD NO PROBLEM doing what THE MEDIA failed at and that lead to the taping of “30 minutes with Vanunu”

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kwdz6dLbfok&feature=channel_video_title

    If you don’t have 1/2 an hour for Vanunu- PLEASE give him 78 seconds and hear his message to Hillary and USA Christians:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Omq-QG7isA&feature=channel_video_title

  10. Brian  July 20, 2011 at 3:52 pm

    James Murdoch, is the heir apparent to take over News Corp, the parent company of FOX News, the Wall Street Journal, the New York Post, and the rest of a vast media empire around the world.

    I found the information in this article very surprising. It’s hard to believe the Zionists would allow James Murdoch to take over News Corp one day unless he’s been properly blackmailed or threatened. Perhaps a few Israeli seductive Swallows will suffice, especially if the acts are caught on video. If James takes over perhaps James will be properly managed from Tel Aviv.

    Excerpts from the article:

    Murdoch, Son Differ Sharply Over Israel
    By JOSH GERSTEIN, Staff Reporter of the Sun | July 25, 2007

    The pro-Israel outlook of the Wall Street Journal and many News Corp. outlets could waver if one of Rupert Murdoch’s sons, James Murdoch, takes the helm of the publishing and broadcasting company, a new book suggests.

    The just-published diaries of a communications director for Prime Minister Blair, Alastair Campbell, indicate that James Murdoch launched into a foul-mouthed tirade that suggested that the behavior of Palestinian Arabs was justified by their poor treatment by Israelis. The outburst occurred at a private dinner with his father, his brother, Lachlan, Mr. Blair, and others at no. 10 Downing St. in January 2002.
    The elder “Murdoch was at one point putting the traditional very right-wing view on Israel and the Middle East peace process and James said that he was ‘talking f— nonsense.’ [Rupert] Murdoch said he didn’t see what the Palestinians’ problem was and James said that it was that they were kicked out of their f— homes and had nowhere to f— live,” Mr. Campbell recorded, adding that the News Corp. chairman was “very pro-Israel, very pro-Reagan.”

    The prime minister’s aide said James Murdoch’s outburst drew a rebuke from his father, who said “he didn’t think he should talk like that in the Prime Minister’s house.”

    Advocates for Israel expressed distress yesterday at the report of James Murodch’s stance on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. “Certainly, it’s troubling,” a spokesman for the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America, Alexander Safian, said. “It’s a little upsetting to hear that perhaps a son who might eventually have a lot of power is not favorably inclined towards Israel.”

    • azbbm1  July 20, 2011 at 6:40 pm

      -Could it be that the Murdoch-UK scandal was ‘engineered’? – and that James Murdoch, due to his pro-Palestinian stance, is the real target?

    • Peter Wakefield Sault  July 21, 2011 at 5:54 pm

      So when can we expect young Jimmy to spill the beans on daddy’s involvement in 9/11?

    • Gordon Duff  July 20, 2011 at 7:09 pm

      Yes, I saw this, the son is a wild eyed anti-zionist

      Then again, what do we know about Josh Gerstein of the Sun.

      Oooops.
      g

  11. tony_opmoc  July 20, 2011 at 3:52 pm

    Gordon,

    I have great respect for your website and many of the articles but I simply do not believe “Pilger, as with Assange, another Murdoch asset, can be seen peddling war on Iran” in the 1hr 48 minute video you posted at a peace conference in Australia.

    Pilger has always been vehemently anti-war especially with Iran – and has been warning and exposing the lies of the neocon crazies and Israel promoting a war with Iran for years. To describe Pilger as an Israeli asset simply doesn’t make sense.

    As to whether Assange is or has been an Israeli asset, I have reached no firm conclusions, but the fact of the matter is that the US Govt which is quite demonstrably an Israeli asset (judging by the standing ovations given by the US Congress to Netanyahu) desperately wants to extradite Assange and almost certainly send him to one of their Gulag’s.

    I can appreciate your enragegement with regards to Israel for hijacking the US Political process for their own ends, but the real position of Evil is far more complex than that and goes back before Israel even existed. Examination of the real history quite clearly shows the Anglo/Americans and their colonialism as far more destructive forces. We need to put our own house in order first, before blaming Israel.

    Tony

    • Gordon Duff  July 20, 2011 at 7:07 pm

      Tony,
      I don’t simply make this shit up.
      Watch the video……until you throw up.
      Really…I wouldn’t waste your time by bullshitting. If I didnt know I would keep my mouth shut.
      g

    • tony_opmoc  July 21, 2011 at 7:11 am

      Gordon,

      I have watched Pilger’s components of this video. He’s extremely passionate and powerful and very Anti-War, Anti-Torture and Anti US, UK and Australian Governments. His main attack is on the US Govt and their crushing of 50 Governments since WWII many of which were Democracies. His only reference to Iran in his speech: “..and it was Clinton in 2008 who said she was prepared to and I quote “annihilate Iran”. Pilger even answers a question from the audience about 9/11 more skillfully and getting much closer to the truth than any other Left Wing journalist – with references to Peter Dale Scott and the history of False Flags – but without coming to any firm conclusions. This is reasonable as any prominent journalist who goes further than that knows that he or she is in great danger. He also states as an Australian “When are we going to grow up and stop supporting Imperial Wars” He also makes references to the need for Direct Action and Civil Disobedience in order to fight for lost freedoms. His refernce to Murdoch – “How we have regressed when 70% of the Capital Press in Australia is owned by one man with extreme views”

      I am not bullshitting. Thanks for posting the video. Its very good.

      Tony

    • Anthony Clifton  July 21, 2011 at 9:04 am

      See Genesis 49. There are no “JEWS” in the Old Testament.The Children of Israel {Anglo-Saxons, Germanic & Celtic & Kindred Peoples}..existed long before the world saw or witnessed anyone being “JEWISH”. Jews are not Israel & Israel will never be “JEWISH”. Even if 300 million braindeadgoy called an elephant a giraffe the braindeadgoy would not change the Truth for the elephant or the giraffe. Ipso facto one simply cannot change the truth by repeating a lie. Furthermore, as Gordon has implied concerning the so-called Central Intelligence Agency …When the zionazi Talmudic terrorists Assassinated John F. Kennedy in Dallas, 22 Nov 63, the so-called CIA became a de facto fog bank for the Talmudic terrorists…[http://www.adl.org/PresRele/Mise_00/4643_00.htm] [http://regions.adl.org/north-texas/news/dallas-police-chief-david-1.html]…any questions ?

    • Peter Wakefield Sault  July 21, 2011 at 6:00 pm

      There is no ‘Old Testament’ in the ‘Old Testament’. It’s a pack of lies from start to finish, except for the bits where Jews massacre innocent women and children.

  12. rgalton  July 20, 2011 at 2:12 pm

    I believe that Assange has been doing plenty of work for the CIA too, with Wikileaks kind of a Mossad/CIA joint-venture. Thankfully the wheels now seem to have come off that rather ludicrous project.

    • Gordon Duff  July 20, 2011 at 7:06 pm

      Who is the CIA anymore? I am not sure anyone knows. I think it might have been sold off at a garage (boot) sale (floh makt).

    • Bob Loblaw Jr  July 21, 2011 at 5:40 am

      The Company was created by bankers. This is the action wing of the bankerocracy. Always has been.

    • Peter Wakefield Sault  July 21, 2011 at 5:57 pm

      Exactly. CIA and MI6 are provincial offices of Mossad, a Rothschild asset.

    • Garibaldi  July 23, 2011 at 8:25 am

      Whoever it is, the new head being screwed on is David Petraeus.

    • Peter Wakefield Sault  July 24, 2011 at 4:58 pm

      If they don’t like him or his attitude to their beloved ersatz “Israel” they’ll just stonewall him. If he then tries to do something about it he’ll get chucked out of a small window at the top of the Bethesda Naval Hospital.

  13. Audry  July 20, 2011 at 2:03 pm

    Anthony,

    Good points all. But TWA 800 for example looks like a tragic accident by the military, who were using the public air passengers as background noise, while testing new anti-missile technologies.

    But the focus on AMDOCS, Comverse, the company that made the “flight termination software”, PTECH and others all lead to 9/11. The focus on 9/11 and WTC Bldg 7 as Alan Sabrosky pointed out should receive our concentrated focus.

    2,000 pounds of explosives in a van at the Washington Bridge with Israeli’s inside on 9/11 looks like a fact that Murdoch buried, with the dancing Israeli’s. Wayne Madsen reported a plane, a 747, loaded with Israeli’s left FULL, (an El Al Flight in fact), on 9/11/01 from NY to Tel Aviv. If many Israeli’s left on that full plane on 9/11/01 and another bunch were picked up and held in the U.S. how many f___ing Israeli’s total? It’s a math question.

    And all the top leaders from Israel were in NYC that day 9/11/01 and probably left soon after the twin towers fell.

    HOW MUCH more incriminating does it need to get? But if they run the news and TV operations, many never learn of these facts.

  14. stevor  July 20, 2011 at 2:00 pm

    Why does Assange tell how he has 500 documents against Murdoch if they’re buddies?

    • Gordon Duff  July 20, 2011 at 2:04 pm

      Steve,
      read the damned article. you will never be a damned detective at this rate. not everyone is going to come out and scream “i did it” because it is easier for you.

      you have gotten lazy

  15. Anthony Clifton  July 20, 2011 at 1:18 pm

    Spot on, but there is a broader context…Amdocs, Comverse & Odigo..& What About the NeoCon Richard K. Armey ? House Majority “Leader” during the Clintoon MalAdministruations…WTC 1 & Waco, Foster, Boorda, Tower, JFK, Jr., Ron Brown, TWA800, ….Lot’s more. [Talley up Sr. “OFFICERS” dying in Plane Crashes!] But hey, it’s gettin’ harder and harder to ignore the Zionazi Elephant in the room..behind the “VEIL” of so-called “National Security”…so where are the nukes to be detonated ? Is the Jericho list plausable ?

    • wallytron  July 20, 2011 at 6:02 pm

      They redid the list, it is now called “Surf City List”

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH
From Veterans Today Network