A Modern Kidnapping on U.S. Soil

Ernst Zundel - politically targeted by the Holocaust Lobby

by Dr. Ingrid Rimland Zundel


By the time the New Millennium rolled around, Ernst Zundel and I had been engaged for several years in a precarious but emotionally rewarding battle for Freedom of Speech, so poignantly described by Dr. Robert Faurisson, acknowledged “Dean of the Holocaust Deniers” world-wide, as “…. the great intellectual adventure at the end of the Twentieth Century.”

We saw ourselves as Europeans of the classical tradition – pure at heart, splendidly accurate in what science had discovered, engaged in a noble endeavor, determined to win at all costs. That our rivals shrieked like banshees about to be castrated whenever we challenged the hoary argument of the “six million” did not matter to us, in the beginning.

We were used to be shrieked at – to be called all kinds of nasty names. Name-calling came with the terrain where even the bravest tread gingerly, as you do in a minefield that a hitherto unopposed enemy has strewn with explosives. We told ourselves that sometimes freedom is expensive. That was the price to be paid so that the people of the Western nations could breathe freely again and not have to look over their shoulder.

Twelve years ago, Fred Leuchter, dispatched by Ernst in the middle of his Second Great Holocaust Trial in Toronto, had gone to Auschwitz, looking for holes in the ceiling through which the hapless Jews, so untold Holocaust Survivors claimed, had been murdered with Zyklon B, by the millions. Fred didn’t find what he had expected to find – and Dr. Faurisson, that master of exactitude, coined four immortal words:

“No holes, no Holocaust.”

Instead, Fred found enormous holes in the traditional account of what was alleged to have happened.

It was a buoyant time. T-Shirt appeared, bumper stickers, cartoons, posters, articles. More articles. And yet more articles. All claiming victory. Forensic science had made mincemeat of a nauseating tale –but there was still no end to arguments. And why? Because out of the woodwork came scores of Chosenites who shrieked, as they had always shrieked: “You no-good effing racists! Prove it!”

We thought we had. What were they – dense? Bloated like ticks with false information? We didn’t realize, at first, this was war of a different kind – NOT war like any other war that had so far been fought!

After the Leuchter Expedition, filmed every millimeter for posterity, Ernst certainly thought that the battle was over. I remember I asked him at the time what else there was to be done, and he said: “Mopping up!”

Holocaust revisionism had reached a plateau – maybe some mopping up was needed, some polishing of arguments, defining terms, buffing statistics? You could argue numbers, or footnotes, or splitting yet another hair five ways – but, as I used to say when I came aboard in 1994, “Do you need to swallow a camel to know what a cutlet tastes like …?”

Both Ernst and I agreed that the Auschwitz details were grindingly boring after the main dispute was settled by forensic science. When one discovers after prodigious detective work that one single murder alleged to have happened did not, in fact, happen as claimed – what do you do? You try to nail down the liar and call his story bluff.

And you expect the relatives to be delighted – not turn on you and call you names. Right? Wrong. Not if you are collecting insurance on a so-called crime that never was.

We found ourselves in a strange bind. It is a platitude to say you cannot “prove” a negative. No murders by gassing had happened. We knew that much. That those who had a stake in claiming what they did would argue otherwise is understandable because a great deal was at stake. Who wants to be defrocked and shown up as a liar and a fraud?

Ernst’s hard-fought-for scientific victory slipped through his fingers like drops of mercury. I don’t think many realized why.

We all agreed that a gigantic fraud had been committed, but then – why preen oneself on one’s political “neutrality”? Why share our dearly bought platform with fraudsters, inviting our deadly enemies to speak at our conventions to make sure every obscure argument could still be aired for them? Why always cover both sides of the issues? There were no two issues.  There were no two sides. Science had spoken. That should have been enough.

A book needs to be written, a song be composed, a film needs to happen to explain why gentiles start squirming like spinsters the moment some oaf starts to call us some names.

That’s our Achilles Heel. We cannot bear to have our spirit impugned – we’d rather smooch with our deadly foes and fawn over their falsehoods and deceptions. Let not our neighbor think we might be “antisemites”, ohmygod!

That’s why there was never a draw. In fact, the war heated up.

Ernst and I chafed under the appalling situation inside Germany. Sack cloth and ashes for our blood relations – a Nobel Prize for Elie Wiesel who, to this day, insists he has a tattoo on his forearm that nobody has ever inspected. “I don’t like to expose my body,” he says.

As we began to realize, the Leuchter findings were not the end result. The were merely a means to an end – meaning: Lifting the guilt from our pathologically guilt-ridden brothers and sisters who had NOT gassed six million Jews, who had not even dreamed of such a grotesque idea – but who meekly agreed that they had.

THAT was the task at hand – regardless of how often and how pathetically that trickster, Elie Wiesel, moaned about smoke coming out of postwar-reconstructed chimneys, as admitted by Auschwitz curator Dr. Franciszek Piper to one of Ernst’s young Jewish friends who put on his yarmulke and got Piper to admit it on tape. That chimney had been “reconstructed.” As David Irving put it: “I’d like to hav e some ‘reconstructed’ money…”

I speak of disenchantment. I do not mean to minimize our Revisionist comrades’ research. They had done a magnificent job, putting nail after nail in the Holocaust coffin. That tiny handful of revisionists all over the world had demolished a gargantuan swindle – yet all that exacting labor for naught? If yet another Chosenite appeared and shrieked at them that they were Nazis, Racists, White Supremacists, the absolute scum of the earth – why, they would fall all over themselves to find additional data, more charts, more detailed footnotes, yet more and more obscure quotations –the better if it came straight from the horse’s mouth!

“All our mannerly pals need”, was my refrain to Ernst, impatient with the direction of Holocaust Revisionism, “is ear locks.”

Look, once upon a time I wrote a dissertation. I know where footnotes come from. I am with David Irving on that issue also – what is the point of quoting each other, or worse, quote yet another professional “survivor” who grins right in your face while lying through his teeth? How often do you have to dig up yet another archeological site and come up with yet another formless shard? What is the point of all that effort, all that sweat, all that money in bringing to the fore the evidence of criminal behavior – and keep on toadying up to the criminal?

Both Ernst and I felt that a course correction was called for.

I was still living in San Diego. Ernst ran his outreach operation from Toronto. That once pristine realm called Canada, asleep at the switch for too many years, by then was mired in a political cesspool, thanks to a bunch of Marxists of the reddest dye who palmed themselves off as Human Rights crusaders. They even had the gall, to my chagrin, to finger and attack my nascent website, baptized ”The Zundelsite”.

One thing led to another. We knew we did not need to be at the receiving end of endless unjust slander. There was no point in arguing what had already been argued to exhaustion. All the crucial information on the Hoax was neatly parked in cyber space, and folks with eyes to see and ears to hear could find out what we said – and didn’t say – about Auschwitz.

What I am telling you is that both Ernst and I essentially withdrew from the original “denial” battlefield. We were looking for a different venue where we could be pro-active. We wanted to find Spartans of the Spirit who would roll up their sleeves and map out where we needed to go.

After Y2K came and went and the world did not come to an end, our world together began.

We hat no idea we were being stalked. My spouse is a romantic fellow, of a caressing warmth. He had made me a bench high up on our hill for my birthday, with a heart in the middle and a breathtaking view of the National Park called the Smokies. Up there, it was peaceful and heavenly quiet. No ARAs to plague us. No fire bugs to burn up Zundel’s house. We both are introspective souls, and we enjoyed our silences as much as we enjoyed our vigorous discussions. We wanted to regroup.

Yet every once in a while, Ernst would say quietly: “Every day is precious. Every day.” And one day, he added: “I know it will not last.”

I said that that was defeatist talk. He just took my hand, looking stubborn.

Onother day we drove to Maryville, a nearby town. There was a stoplight next to a prison. As we were waiting for the light to change, Ernst said while staring straight ahead: “That’s where I’ll end up. You’ll see.”

I hated that. I said: “Whatever do you mean? You haven’t done anything wrong. You are here legally. You are my husband. I am a US citizen. We have applied for a green card and have been tentatively approved. We are in the telephone book. It’s not as if you are some scruffy wetback from Mexico. They can just haul you into some dungeon, with nobody any the wiser!”

Once we came back from our morning walk, and there stood a girl by our driveway. With a camera. She turned her back to us as we passed by. There was no reason for her to be there, and to this day I scold myself that we did not confront her and ask what she thought she was doing.

We very seldom watched TV, so we missed the 9/11 morning drama until our meter man told us. Later, we were sitting in the kitchen, stuffing letters for our supporters. An iron fist got hold of my heart, and I could feel my face getting hot. After what seemed an eternity, Ernst said in a voice that was not his voice:

“That was a coup. Henceforth, this will no longer be a kinder, gentler nation.”

Ernst is a horse-and-buggy man. He has never, to this day, sent an email. He wouldn’t know what to do with a website. I used to run off articles for him that he would read at breakfast.

On the other hand, and this needs to be said and understood, Ernst has an infallible radar for things that are not of this world – that are, to use a fancy term, preternatural. I have often heard him say: “Why do I know these things? Where does this knowledge come from?”

About two weeks after the attack, Ernst started brooding on “the dust.” He used to ask three, four times a day: “Why so much dust? Somebody ought to analyze that dust…”

He talked about the dust, again and again, weeks and then months after the Twin Towers shattered.

He knew instinctively that there was something wrong with the official story – this long before there was a 9/11 Commission, before there were suspicious citizens groups, years before there was aggressive alternative media.

I printed out an article. It was written by “Anonymous” who blamed the Chosenites. Recall that, in the early days, all talk was of the Arabs. Today we know who wrote that lengthy, meticulously researched essay – a fellow by the name of Albert D. Pastore, Ph.D. But then, we didn’t know – and neither did the New World Order guys who somehow got wind of what Zundel had read.

Not written, mind you! Merely read! Not even officially published. Ernst merely ran off some 50 or so copies amid the clutter in our garage on our second-hand copier, gave it a blue cover, and sent it to some friends.

Ernst kept obsessing on “the dust.” It was at hand to think of Fred Leuchter, whom Ernst had sent to Auschwitz as a forensic sleuth, and who might be enticed, Ernst told me casually, to go and see if there was something he might find that would explain “the dust”.

Maybe our phone was bugged. Maybe Ernst sent that booklet to Fred – and maybe it was intercepted. He doesn’t remember he did, and I don’t recall details either.

Somebody must have clear freaked out. Remember the collapse of the official Holotale right in the court room in Toronto in 1988? Was Zundel unto something again? He had that reputation.

Several years later, after Ernst had already been taken into custody, a friend of ours who is a European diplomat with contacts within the UN, called me one merry morning and told me: “It was the blue booklet that did it!”

“They kept watching him,” explained our friend. “After you guys moved to the hills of Tennessee, they watched him. They were biding their time. When Ernst published that blue booklet, that was the last straw! That’s when it was decided to take him out for good.”

“Who decided?”

“Somebody at the State Department. At the highest level.”

“Who? At what ‘highest level’”?

“At the VERY highest level,” our friend told me, and that is all he ever said to me, though I pushed him and pushed him for details.

“Colin Powell? Dick Cheney? Maybe even Bush? Who?”

He wouldn’t say. He hasn’t told me to this day. He only added: “I have already said too much.”

You be the judge as to how it was done. Here are a few of the documents I have since secured and squirreled away. You judge for yourself what went on.

So now you know that the Powers-that-be were freaked out very early – by what Ernst Zundel’s radar had picked up brooding on “the dust” in the spring-scented hills of Tennessee.

All this to prevent the distribution of a little saddle-stitched booklet that pointed a finger at the Usual Suspects? I do believe that our enemies freaked out. They acted on their fear – and thus transported Zundel back into the Vaterland where he is now the best-known dissident, much like that famous Russin nonconformist, Solzhenitsyn.

I believe there is a lesson there for the 9/11 warriors. They might want to borrow a page from the Revisionist crowd and the opportunities lost chasing footnotes and splitting hairs five ways. The crucial question was not EVER for Revisionists – nor is it now for 9/11 Truthers – HOW it was done. There is Building 7. What more does one need? The crucial question is: WHO did it – and WHY. Ernst lost his freedom. In seven years of prison, he almost lost his life. I might lose mine. You might lose yours. Why lose America because somebody calls you a name?

Since 9/11, it’s been ten years. Much work has been done, and much time has been lost. Wherever you look, good people play ostrich from fear. So what if someone calls you a “conspiracist” – and worse?! Consider the source. Consider how much is at stake. Is it not prudent to put all those scholarly egos aside – and ferret out the culprits?

Remember: Sometimes freedom is expensive.


Video clips featured in this article are from a remastered DVD titled “Off Your Knees, Germany!” Available at cost – $ 5.- plus courtesy postage. Write for an order blank. [email protected]

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on July 24, 2011, With Reads Filed under Government. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

22 Responses to "A Modern Kidnapping on U.S. Soil"

  1. Daniel Berg  August 14, 2011 at 8:45 am

    I think this is a very excellent article. The only issue I have with it is the suggestion to read Mark Weber’s writings. He was very involved in the illegal takeover of IHR from its founder, Willis Carto, just as he was “probably” instrumental in the closing down of the Spotlight newspaper. This is not to say that his writings are inaccurate. I just think he is a backstabber that can’t be trusted.

  2. Crazy Horse  July 30, 2011 at 10:41 am

    I was especially struck by the following words that Dr. Zundel wrote above:

    About two weeks after the attack, Ernst started brooding on “the dust.” He used to ask three, four times a day: “Why so much dust? Somebody ought to analyze that dust…”

    He talked about the dust, again and again, weeks and then months after the Twin Towers shattered.

    Ernst kept obsessing on “the dust.” It was at hand to think of Fred Leuchter, whom Ernst had sent to Auschwitz as a forensic sleuth, and who might be enticed, Ernst told me casually, to go and see if there was something he might find that would explain “the dust”.

    So now you know that the Powers-that-be were freaked out very early – by what Ernst Zundel’s radar had picked up brooding on “the dust” in the spring-scented hills of Tennessee.

    There is another individual that also, almost immediately, started looking for some kind of explanation with regard to “the dust” … and that person is Dr. Judy Wood. In fact, Dr. Wood has even come up with a new word – “dustification”. VT readers may wish to visit her two websites —



    She has had two quite recent radio interviews with Jeff Rense talking about her work and her new book, Where Did The Towers Go. Listening to these two interviews may be the quickest way to come up to speed with regard to this lady’s research if you are not, as yet, familiar with her:

    Rense interview #1 – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bkvmS53QVv0

    Rense interview #2 – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8b_jdIaPYE

    I hope folks will take a look at what Dr. Wood has come up with. She may, indeed, have done the forensic investigative work that Ernst Zundel so wanted Fred Leuchter to perform in order to satisfy his troubled mind about … “the dust”.

    Lastly, of course he was quite right when he said …

    “That was a coup. Henceforth, this will no longer be a kinder, gentler nation.”

  3. Oklahoma  July 29, 2011 at 3:42 pm

    Dr. Ingrid Rimland Zundel,

  4. Oklahoma  July 29, 2011 at 3:39 pm

    Tonight: the ADL peddles the New Age.

    In the summer of 1989, the entire world was reeling in shock and horror over the discovery of a Satanic burial ground on a ranch in Matamoros, Mexico. Dozens of mutilated, cannibalized corpses were discovered.

    The grisly details of the kidnapping and human sacrifice of one of the cult’s victims–Texas college student, Mark Kilroy–prompted Texas State legislators to draft a law stiffening the penalties for Satanic, ritualistic crimes, and making it a criminal offense to conduct certain occult rituals. The Governor of Texas convened a Special Session of the legislature to get the bill passed.

    But, ladies and gentlemen, the ADL–the Anti-Defamation League–while peddling bills all across the country that would make it a crime just to think anti-semitic thoughts–launched an all-out effort to defeat the Texas crack-down on Satanic crimes, branding the bill “anti-semitic”.

    Now, if it was true that the bill was “anti-semitic”, it would be an admission by the ADL that “semitic” means “Satanic”. However, that’s not true, as you will see. “Semitic” does not mean “Satanic”. However, that’s what this reaction by the ADL would imply.

  5. Oklahoma  July 29, 2011 at 4:32 am

    And if verifies everything that I have ever said to you, ladies and gentlemen, about how we are manipulated by these people–the Illuminati, the secret societies–for the ADL does not represent the Jewish people.

    It represents a secret organization, a secret society, a branch of the Illuminati known as B’nai B’rith, controlled by the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry.

    I’ve been telling you this for a long, long time.

    Many of the victims of the ADL have been Jews over the years. And as you will see, as you continue to listen to the expose of the ADL, as written in a report by the editors of the “Executive Intelligence Review”, as you will see, ladies and gentlemen, all of us are being manipulated.

    And for any of you out there who may be Jewish, this is not an anti-Jewish program; it is not anti-semitic. And if you blindly support the ADL without thoroughly investigating them as the “Executive Intelligence Review” has done, and as we have done, it would be exactly the same as if I blindly supported anti-semitic organizations simply because they claimed to be acting in the best interest of the Caucasian race, or of Christianity. So, don’t be foolish in this.


  6. DaveE  July 28, 2011 at 9:55 am

    Well said. Thank you so much for your (and your husband’s) courage and candor. We have the data, we have the science, we have the research. Now we just need a megaphone to compete with “the noisy lobby” as you so aptly call it and make the TRUTH heard, everywhere we can. WE need to OUT NOISE the noisy lobby!

    Thanks so much to VT for giving us a voice. Great work, friends.

  7. kashu  July 26, 2011 at 5:49 pm

    Zionists are not really worried about financial crisis or revolutions. their financial institutions are not part of our national entity anymore. they are historically parasitic. they always need a host country to depend on and tax the life out of the poor people in the host country. but in order for people to bring about any strike or street demonstration they need to be organized which they are not unlike the organized Jewry. Zionists control every opposition group or any voice of descent. all the union leaders, leftist leaders, activists, intellectuals are Zionists. they push this idea so aggressively that their created personalities are to be followed like a prophet. if you ask any question you will be labeled either as someone who is unqualified or a conspiracy theorist or an anti Semite. so, in case there is a big crisis or a great depression they will make sure that they are the ones to offer the solutions and they are the ones to lead the fake revolution to take over the nation again. be aware of their tricks.

  8. Doug  July 26, 2011 at 1:36 pm

    Whoa, got cut off…..and can only pray that we bring our country back to some system of justice. Best, Doug

  9. Doug  July 26, 2011 at 12:36 pm

    ‘May the truth set us free’, as painful as it may be…..Most all wars and conflicts throughout history are based on deceiving large groups of people and using these people to kill one another for the gains of a small group of elite’.
    We now find ourselves in a very difficult situation and can only pray

  10. Dr. Ingrid Rimland Zundel  July 26, 2011 at 3:59 am

    I appreciate the technical information. I was primarily arguing that while Revisionist science was (and is) airtight that demolished the Hoax about the “gassings”, the political will was lacking in the Revisionist community to take the next important step, namely to hold the criminals to account for their various extortion games.

    Revisionists have always prided themselves on being “neutral” politically. How can one be “neutral” when so much is at stake? All of Germany is still held hostage because of this all-pevervasive temporal religion that allows the fraudsters to pick good people’s pockets?

    But I am not a critic of Revisionist research. Revisionists are a motley crew; as a rule, they are not political animals. Politically, they are passive to a fault. It all boils down to people having different abilities and different agendas. I think the next step in this spiritual struggle to neutralized a harmful fraud and its perpetrators is precisely what VT is doing in allowing revisionists a legitimate platform that helps to take their findings mainstream.

    Ingrid Rimland

  11. Jim W. Dean  July 25, 2011 at 5:31 pm

    Astro, Ingrid and Ernst have earned a right to be heard. If not them, then no one has it.

    VT does not shy away third rail issues, and in this case what has happened to revisionists is a threat to us all as the precedent is now set to expand the definition of dangerous and inciteful ideas. These terms anti-semite and holocaust denier have become lynch mob terms. There are many in the Intel biz who just consider in an Intel operation to incite hate and feat themselves. I will let you guess you they are.

    We will be hearing and learning a lot more about all this and the historical sources are going to be much easier to show people with the tools we have now. Veterans particularly need to learn about the subversion of our institutions that has been going on at home while they are deployed overseas. And a lot of this is in our own declassified Intel archives

  12. astro3  July 25, 2011 at 1:34 pm

    Well done VT for giving Ingrid Zundel a column.
    The Leuchter Report kick-started the Revisionist movement, an awesome achievement by Ernst Zundel, Faurrison (his lawyer) and Fred himself.

    But, as regards ‘proof’ permit me to suggest to Ingrid that science is all about repeatability of data, and it was not until the brilliant PhD chemist Germar Rudolf took a fairly similar lot of wall-samples from similar locations and had them analysed for total iron cyanide using the same procedure as Leuchter – then obtained similar results – that we had real proof!

    The data was telling us (1) that the walls were porous to cyanide gas, they soaked it up. Walls of ‘gas chambers’ in German WW2 labour camps were exposed to many tons of the zyklon (granular cyanide). (2) Iron in the walls bonded permanently with the cyanide. These two principles establish the concept of memory, that chemical sampling today will tell us where the cyanide was used sixty years ago. (3) Alleged human gas chambers are found to have no significant elevation of wall cyanide above normal, background levels (as found in dormitories, washrooms etc). This is the bit that people call ‘Holocaust denial,’ and tells us that buildings alleged in the holo-textbooks to have been human gas chambers, were never regularly exposed to cyanide. (4) The delousing chambers have three orders of magnitude, i.e. a thousand times higher, levels of wall-cyanide, than these others.

    This 4th principle establishes that the insecticide zyklon was used in the German labour camps for its proper, normal function, i.e. killing lice in the clothing and bedding that was put into the delousing chambers. This normal hygiene technology held the typhus epidemic at bay. Thus a modern definition of what people call a ‘Holocaust denier’ is a person who affirms that the zyklon was used for its normal, proper purpose.

  13. Marc C. Daniele  July 25, 2011 at 1:12 pm

    I don’t know about you people, but I know it’s time to take back our “Republic” from these scum!

    Our young are dying for these scum!

    Grow some balls people!

    Show them what a REAL Holocaust is!

    After all they have brought it on themselves!

    Remeber the USS Liberty, and 9/11!
    Restore The US Constitution!
    US “Republic” First, Always!

    US Army Veteran,
    Marc C. Daniele
    Herculaneum, Mo.

  14. Wally58  July 25, 2011 at 5:44 am

    There were kamps, yes, but not any gas chambers or ovens, other than for disinfecting clothing and burning bodies with Typhus. Many call it “The Hoaxacost” and for good reason. Yet, we locked up ALL the Japs on the West Coast and literally STOLE all their land holdings. All they had left in 1945 was what they brought to Manzinar in suitcases. We NEVER hear them complain or say how they were Holocosted. Nothing on the TV about this crime. Why? Because the Edomites OWN the ENTIRE news media. That’s why. Remember, the Hoaxacost is the Edomite’s CASH COW. We pay them BILLIONS of $$$$ a year for their whining bullsh*t.

  15. Peter  July 24, 2011 at 6:54 pm

    Thank you Dr. Ingrid Zundel,
    I learn so much from you work here!
    I am constantly amazed at the absolute vengeful and genocidal nature of the Zionist attacks on those who speak the truth.
    When Napoleon was defeated, the European powers simply restricted him to an Island. On his second defeat, they sent him to a smaller Island. But when the Jews won the 2nd World War, they murdered anyone in a position of authority, after forcing them with torture to sign statements of guilt, and murdered untold millions of civilians, something not even dreamed of with Napoleon’s French citizens.
    We live in a dark time, when the horrifying murder of one million Iraqi children can occur without concern.
    The Babylonian Talmud states that non-Jews are not human beings, but only “animals that walk on two legs”. That Jews think little of mass-murdering non-Jews should be of little surprise, I suppose, though I fear what the future holds. The memory of 66 million Christian Russians, 8 to 14 million Ukrainian Christian farmers, and millions of Christian Germans and other Eastern European Christians, all murdered by the Bolshevik Talmudic Jews, worries me to no end. These demon-worshippers now have the nuclear bomb!
    Every day, we are bombarded by hypnotic media propaganda that constantly reminds us of the evil Germans under the label of Nazis. The Holocaust; the 6 million; and on and on it goes… Even the Harry Potter series had the compulsory evil Nazis!
    God help us all!
    If we don’t fight this our children, the few that remain, will all be slaves!

  16. Rob  July 24, 2011 at 5:23 pm

    Thank you so much for what is a revelation to me, Dr. Ingrid. Ernst, by passing on the “blue book”,
    was sharing what he suspected to be some truth about 9/11. Previously, I couldn’t comprehend his kidnapping and subsequent persecution and torture. It seemed unnecessary. As you stated, the truth was exposed. The 9/11 info was the potential to expose another lie. Ernst was (is) highly respected. They couldn’t afford to have lies exposed. Thanks again, and all the best to y’all.

  17. Gordon "Gord" Pratt  July 24, 2011 at 4:00 pm

    Idaho journalist Michael A Hoffman ll has written a fine book called The Great Holocaust Trial, about the events referred to at the top of the article..

  18. Brian  July 24, 2011 at 3:14 pm

    A recent issue of the International Herald Tribune, April 21, 2005 included an Associated Press story about an official Israeli government report from 2004 in which the following words appear:
    “At the beginning of 2004, 1,092,000 Holocaust survivors were still living worldwide, about half of them in Israel.”

    The Holocaust story is indeed a monstrous hoax–and we are all victims of its madness–but the German people has suffered the most and deserves the greatest possible compensation, and an apology. As to the Americans, they should look at themselves in the mirror.


    Brian: If the Nazis want to exterminate the Jews but didn’t have the time to exterminate them via the gas chamber why didn’t they just kill them by denying them water and food? It doesn’t make any sense. According to German documents the people in the intern camp were valuable to Germany because they were making munitions for the war.

  19. Brian  July 24, 2011 at 2:50 pm

    From the article:

    The crucial question was not EVER for Revisionists – nor is it now for 9/11 Truthers – HOW it was done. There is Building 7. What more does one need? The crucial question is: WHO did it – and WHY.

    Here is the evidence that implicates the real culprits:

    I’m sorry about what happened to your husband. Just awful.

    For those who actually believe the Germans had a plan to exterminate the Jews and had gas chambers to kill them read this stunning evidence:


    A slight warning, the article includes a photograph of the insightful revisionist Robert Faurisson with a bloody mouth. You can scroll down and starting reading at The findings of revisionist research.

    Also read insightful, stunning articles written by Mark Weber about what really happened regarding the Holocaust at the ihr.org website.

    Not one autopsy of a person dying at the camps from being gassed. Not one document showing the Germans had a plan to exterminate the Jews or to build and operate gas chambers to kill people. The Germans kept extensive records and scholarly revisionists have read them.

    Abe Foxman was asked by Google to help them deal with supposedly racists websites showing up high in Google searches. Abe had been complaining about this.

    Google was co-founded by a Jewish person Sergey Brin. Wikipedia states he was born to Jewish parents in Moscow. Lawrence page the other co-founder, according to his Wikipedia page is Jewish on his mother’s side, and was raised without religion. However, I don’t know if their Jewish heritage is a factor in their rankings of Jewish related searches.

    Today I did a Google search: Mark Weber holocaust IHR. The two top entries on the page one search results are for the ADL website! The first entry for the IHR website is at #5. However, the rankings can change.

    I have to wonder if that was part of the algorithm adjustment Google made to downgrade supposedly racist websites in Google search results. I don’t know if Google considers IHR a racist website but I have to wonder if they tweaked the algorithm for IHR Google searches.

  20. John Taurus  July 24, 2011 at 2:12 pm

    The attack in Norway was to give the government an excuse to target Whites as terrorists if they speak out in opposition to the Zionist control of our governments. Such Whites will be arrested, taken away, and never heard from again. Israel is the capital of the United States and Europe. Norway was a warning to other public officials in Europe and America. Accidents happen all the time to people the traitors in our government don’t want to talk.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

From Veterans Today Network