15 Responses to "9/11 Unveiled (part 1 of 10): Attack, Response"

  1. sam  August 29, 2011 at 7:35 am

    Good news, bad news..The UFO’s are coming and their insignia is the Star of David!

  2. sharkattack1313  August 29, 2011 at 6:56 am

    If an honest investigation does happen, it will most likely happen outside of the USA. Sadly it will get no press coverage. It will bounce around the “compartmentalized” walls of our internet rooms, but get no traction. We are like Dead Heads following the same bread trail of info set in front of us by our pied piper of propaganda. Action, in the form of lawsuits, seldom happen. They got to the victim’s families first, now they are getting to the dying first responders setting them up with losing Lawyers and compromised Judges. It is way too late for Us. All we can do is expose the enemy to our loved ones and friends. Make sure that they know that our politicians are bought and paid for by special interests groups. Let them know that the media is a mouthpiece for the PTB to promote their evil Blueprint for mankind. Educate them on Usry and how a central bank can manipulate the laws of the land and create economies good or bad by contracting and expanding money supply. Use real examples they happen everyday. Even read up about Islam and the Talmud. Compare them and realize that what they say about the Muslim’s is really out of their book. Get out of the line and think for yourselves and see the absurdity of the path your pied piper is taking you, us.

  3. Todd Marshall  August 28, 2011 at 4:30 pm

    Who is the intended audience for these pieces?

  4. adeUK  August 28, 2011 at 8:29 am

    The quest for the minds of “young people” continues unabated. The pusher of deception in this instance is ColoringBook.com publisher Wayne Bell. I will no longer purchase his books.

    The question arises, is he aiding abetting and protecting the 911 perpetrators by spreading a false narrative ? In effect providing cover. If so here is a video confession.

    (WXYZ) – On the brink of the 10th anniversary of September 11th a new children’s ‘graphic coloring novel’ has emerged.

    We want to know; is it appropriate for kids?

    According to the publisher, the book entitled ‘We Shall Never Forget 9/11 – The Kids’ Book of Freedom’ is “designed to be a tool that parents can use to help teach children about the facts surrounding 9/11.”

    The book opens on September 11, 2011 with a picture of Osama Bin Laden as he plots the US attacks. It ends nearly 10 years later with the raid of Bin Laden’s Abbottabad compound and his death.

    Several pages show both American military and Muslims with guns. The final page of the story shows a bullet flying toward Bin Laden before his death.

    Publishers say the book ‘demonstrates honesty, reverence, integrity and good character,’ with ‘a historic and educational perspective.’

    Read more: http://www.wxyz.com/dpp/lifestyle/family/new-9_11-graphic-coloring-book-emerges-on-brink-10-year-anniversary#ixzz1WKqxpOU4

  5. Trowbridge Ford  August 28, 2011 at 2:32 am

    And can you believe it, the addressee of the e-mail: info@9-11Commission.gov has been erased from it, apparently by NSA and its eavesdroppers around the world.
    Will try to post it again with the address shown if anyone suggests it, or will supply it to anyone who e-mails me, and wants to see it.
    Most serious incident I know of regarding US government hacking of one’s correspondence.

  6. Trowbridge Ford  August 28, 2011 at 2:22 am

    In my opinion, there is no question who permitted the 9/11 attacks to occur, as this e-mail I sent to the 9/11 Commission indicated, and I failed to include as the party to whom I sent it when I posted it on another thread:

    —– Original Message —–
    From: “TROWBRIDGE FORD”
    To:
    Sent: Friday, April 11, 2003 9:03 AM
    Subject: feedback from editor about 9/11 article

    >
    > —– Original Message —–
    > From: “Mark Ian Birdsall”
    > To: “TROWBRIDGE FORD”
    > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:06 PM
    > Subject: FROM EYE SPY
    >
    >
    > Dear Trowbridge
    >
    > Many, many thanks for your letter. Before commenting, let me say your
    > feature that I called THE PRELUDE has been received very, very well in
    > Washington D.C. It is excellent. Usually there is a backlash from the
    > Establishment, but not on this occasion. As one says, you have hit the
    > jackpot!
    >
    > Now, on to the Chinook affair. No Trowbridge, I do not believe the pilots
    > are guilty of gross negligence, far from it. The Eye Spy report proposes
    > several different scenarios, but pilot error is not really one of them,
    > although cannot be ruled out of course.
    >
    > Yes the Castlereagh break-in is causing mayhem over here – as you would
    > expect. Some 200 names and addresses of agents, handlers and other
    > intelligence officers are now in the hands of those who perpetrated the
    > raid.
    >
    > There has been a clampdown of information on the affair, but I was speaking
    > with one the agent¹s who is undoubtedly on that list. He now fears for his
    > life and was sent a bullet only recently through the post.
    >
    > Warm regards Trowbridge and will let you know what is coming up in issue 9.
    > Have you received issue 8 yet?
    >
    > Mark

    ——————————————

    Of course, the Commission never even acknowledged my e-mail, much less investigated it – what happened several times subsequently with the same result, and I am willing to post them if posters want.

    The government is never going to allow any serious new inquiry into its own cockup.

  7. Snoopy  August 27, 2011 at 8:15 pm

    PS: Not USA.

  8. Snoopy  August 27, 2011 at 8:12 pm

    If I were a writer I’ll attempt to research and present the following theory, but I’m not so I’ll just chum the water, as it were, and see if anyone else agrees;

    We were attacked all right. Not only that, our government was overthrown beforehand. Watch “September Clues” then ask “just where did those missiles come from?”. There’s really only one answer.

    • Smitty  August 27, 2011 at 10:39 pm

      September clueless is propaganda and outdated.

      You’re right about our government being overthrown. It was overthrown by a terrorist organization.

      The proof is all in the name – Homeland Security

      Homeland? Nobody uses that word referring to the USA. Only the ‘tribe’ uses the word homeland. In Hebrew homeland means Moledet. Moledet is also Hebrew for the German concept of Heimat. The word translates into homeland in English. The meaning does not, it gets lost in translation.

      What does it mean? It is a lot more complicated than simply translating it as ‘homeland’ and the definition has been twisted over time to support ideologies like fascism and Zionism. Moledet is also a ‘nationalist’ (fascist) political party in Israel that advocated the transfer of Palestinians from the West Bank. It is very small these days although Herut which later became Likud supports the notion as well. In Moledet’s case it was just really their only platform. Moledet allied with the revisionist Zionists (terrorists rooted in Irgun) over the years. Netanyahu is a member of Likud

      The “homeland” in Homeland Security is NOT the USA. It is Israel. Zionism. The Jewish people. Or as eluded to in Kafka’s writings (especially “The Trial”) it refers to the truth. The Zionists are hiding something from us. They’ve been hiding it for centuries.

    • Smitty  August 27, 2011 at 10:58 pm

      It’s in the Bible too although probably not in most of the Christian ones. Specifically in Genesis 12 YHWH tells Abraham to lead his people to the Moledet.

      Moledet is the ‘chosen land’ and is often used in conjunction with Eretz Israel (Greater Israel).

      Homeland Security refers to the tribe, not the USA

    • foo  August 27, 2011 at 11:42 pm

      @ Smitty

      “You’re right about our government being overthrown. It was overthrown by a terrorist organization.”

      You got the time frame wrong.

      That terrorist organization overthrew the United States government on November 22, 1963.

      Yes, the assassination of JFK was a coup, orchestrated by Israel.

  9. Smitty  August 27, 2011 at 6:00 pm

    Great piece. Looking forward to the rest.

    I believe we will all be successful in getting a new investigation eventually. The hard part will be making sure it cannot be set up for failure. There will also be difficulty in charging the neocon and Zionist criminals who pulled it off. Many of them are the same criminals who pushed for a war with Iraq and nobody ever charged them for that despite the false accusations that got us into it.

    JFK has gone nowhere in 48 years and questioning the Holocaust is mostly taboo. The Internet didn’t exist back then though and it is a very powerful tool that these criminals are unable to control. That nearly half Americans don’t buy the 9/11 OS Kool-Aid means that anybody who violently defends it should be questioned. I have hardly met anybody IRL who believed the Nosama story.

    The Norway attacks proved they are losing their grip. It was ridiculously filed under ‘lone wolf did it all, don’t ask questions, shut up about it’ yet even among the sheeple people are not buying it. 4chan was full of trolls pushing the lone wolf narrative and insulting anybody who questioned it proving these criminals will do whatever it takes to try and push their narrative as history.

    Libya’s PR coverage sealed the deal IMHO. Don’t believe a word of what they are saying about Syria either, that was also on the PNAC agenda.

    Americans still care about 9/11 and 9/11 is relevant today since we are still experiencing the consequences. Prove to them and the world that the whole thing was a lie and the house of cards falls apart. Expect them to play their UFO invasion card

    • foo  August 27, 2011 at 11:02 pm

      Any investigation of 9/11 is doomed to failure.

      1) No governmental body would conduct an investigation. No legislative or judicial body would touch it. It would be a civilian inquiry only.

      2) Only a governmental body has the power to subpeona witnesses and to prosecute perjury. Appearance before a non-governmental body would be voluntary only, and it’s only perjury to lie to a governmental body.

      3) Who would be invited to appear, and who would be excluded, and who would make that determination? How would the leadership of the investigation be established?

      4) Jim Fetzer says that no planes hit the towers, that the TV images of a plane’s hitting the south tower were done with FX. Others say that a missile, covered with a hologram, hit the south tower. Some say that Flight 175 hit the south tower; others say that it was a remote-controlled military plane.

      Stephen Jones says that the towers were brought down with nano-thermate. Others says that nano-thermate was used only to cut the steel beams; explosives brought down the towers. Was there a 100 KT nuclear bomb down deep in the basements, were there several micro-nukes, was/were the weapon(s) nuclear or fusion only — opinions vary there, too. Let’s not forget Judy Woods’ (supported by Jim Fetzer) particle beam weapon.

      Did Flight 93 crash into the smoking hole in the ground near Shanksville, or was it shot down, scattering its pieces down an eight mile stretch?

      Did Flight 77 crash into the Pentagon, or was it a Global Hawk or a missile? Or did nothing hit the Pentagon? Was the Pentagon exploded from inside, and Flight 77 flew over the Pentagon?

      5) Who did 9/11? Again, a wide range of opinions.

      6) Which of those regarded as researchers are expressing an honest difference of opinion, and which ones are disinfo agents? How would the investigation team make that determination?

      7) Those were excluded from testifying and those who testified and whose theories were discarded would cry, “Foul!”

      In short, after the investigation, we’d still be at the same point where we are now, with competing theories being voiced by their competing advocates.

    • smacko  August 28, 2011 at 2:11 pm

      Yes, of course, the individuals obstructing justice will have to be dealt with first!

      As has been pointed out several times, and nevertheless, should not be hard to understand.

      😉

You must be logged in to post a comment Login