9/11: Open Letter Challenge to ADL’s Abe Foxman

Abraham Foxman has been the national director of the Anti-Defamation league since 1987

by Alan Hart

 

Mr. Foxman, your assertion that criticism of Israel is by definition a manifestation of anti-Semitism, is Zionist propaganda nonsense for a blackmail purpose, the purpose being to silence criticism and prevent informed and honest debate about Israel’s policies and actions.

Dear Abe Foxman,

In your lengthy article Decade of Deceit: Anti-Semitic 9/11 Conspiracy Theories 10 Years Later, you label a number of named writers and commentators including me who say that Israel’s Mossad was or even might have been involved in the 9/11 terror attack as anti-Semitic, and you assert that they are demonizing “the Jews”.

You also say: “Anticipating criticism, a number of these anti-Semitic conspiracists now try to immunize themselves against charges of anti-Semitism by making disclaimers up front about not being anti-Semitic. Their own works and record, however, blatantly contradict their innocuous self-characterizations.”

I have to assume that I am one of the “number” in the above quotation because when you introduce at the end of your piece a few sentences of what I have said on the subject of 9/11, you do so with these words: “After pre-emptively trying to dismiss charges of anti-Semitism, Hart asserts…”

I also have to assume that you have not read (surprise! surprise!) my epic book, Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews, three volumes in its American edition (www.claritypress.com). Except those who are brainwashed by Zionist propaganda and deluded to the point of clinical madness, nobody could read this book and conclude that I was anti-Semitic.

Images from the Alan Hart collection

The first picture in it is of Golda Meir when she was prime minister, inscribed it in her own hand “To a good friend, Alan Hart.” Do you believe, Mr. Foxman, that old lady was so stupid that she couldn’t have seen through me if I was anti-Jew?

As I say in the book and on every public platform on which I speak, THE key to understanding is knowledge of the difference between Judaism and Zionism. Here is how I am going to summarise this difference in a speech in Germany on this September 11.

JUDAISM is the religion of Jews, not “the” Jews because not all Jews are religious. Like Christianity and Islam, Judaism has at its core a set of moral values and ethical principles.

ZIONISM is a sectarian, colonial-like nationalism which created a state for some Jews in the Arab heartland mainly by terrorism and ethnic cleansing, and by doing so demonstrated contempt for, and made a mockery of, Judaism’s moral values and ethical principles. In reality mainstream Judaism and Zionism are total opposites.

I’m also going to wonder aloud how many in my German audience are aware of two particular background facts. One is of that the return of Jews to the land of biblical Israel by the efforts of man – one possible but wholly inadequate definition of Zionism – was proscribed by Judaism. The other is that prior to the obscenity of the Nazi holocaust, the vast majority of Jews everywhere, and especially many eminent American Jews including the then owner of The New York Times, were totally opposed to Zionism’s Palestine project. Why?

They believed it to be morally wrong. They feared it would lead to unending conflict with the Arabs and the wider Muslim world. But most of all they feared that if Zionism was allowed by the big powers to have its way, it would one day provoke violent anti-Semitism on a grand scale.

I am then going to give the two main reasons why knowledge of the difference between Judaism and Zionism is the key to understanding.

The first is that when you know the difference, you can understand why it is perfectly possible to be passionately anti-Zionist (anti Zionism’s colonial enterprise) without being in any way, shape or form anti-Semitic in the sense of loathing and even hating all Jews everywhere just because they are Jews.

The second is that when you know the difference between Judaism and Zionism, you can understand why it is wrong to blame all Jews everywhere for the crimes of the hard core Zionists in Israel.

Defenders of Israel right or wrong assert that Judaism and Zionism are one and the same in order to make the charge, as you do Mr. Foxman, that criticism of Israel is by definition a manifestation of anti-Semitism. That, I will tell my German audience, is Zionist propaganda nonsense for a blackmail purpose, the purpose being to silence criticism and prevent informed and honest debate about Israel’s policies and actions.

And I will add this: “When you know the difference between Judaism and Zionism, you don’t have to be frightened about being falsely accused of anti-Semitism for speaking and writing the truth of history as it relates to the making and sustaining of the conflict in and over Palestine that became Israel. You can say to your Zionist accuser, ‘Go to hell!’”.

Mr. Foxman, I’m not going to tell you to go to hell. I have a constructive suggestion to make. If you truly believe that I am anti-Semitic, why don’t you say so explicitly in writing (on ADL’s web site will be fine) and then I can sue you. And that will give us the Mother and Father of a test case to determine what anti-Semitism is and is not. (For some of my in-depth thinking on this matter you may care to visit Kanan 48 . There you’ll find an article of mine with the headline Anti-Semitism – Zionist myth vs truth and reality.)

While you are thinking about how to respond to my suggestion, you might like to consider two particular statements I make in my book and on most public platforms.

The first is this. I do not blame the Zionist lobby for acting in the way it does. It is only playing the game according to the rules. I blame a corrupt, pork-barrel system of American politics which puts what passes for democracy sale up to the highest bidders.

The second is this. The Jews, generally speaking are the intellectual elite of the Western civilization and the Palestinians are by far the intellectual elite of the Arab world. What these two peoples could do together in peace and partnership is the stuff that dreams are made of. They could change the region for the better and by doing so give new hope and inspiration to the whole world.

And I’ll add this. I have two driving motivations.

One is to contribute to the understanding needed if there is ever to be an acceptable amount of justice for the Palestinians. Without it the future is predictable – catastrophe for all, possibly in the shape of a Clash of Civilizations, Judeo-Christian v Islamic.

The other is to contribute to the understanding needed to stop Holocaust II, shorthand for another great turning against the Jews. My Gentile views on this aspect of the matter are in tune with the warning words of Yehoshafat Harkabi, Israel’s longest serving Director of Military Intelligence. In his book Israel’s Fateful Hour, published in 1986, he wrote this:

Israel is the criterion according to which all Jews will tend to be judged. Israel as a Jewish state is an example of the Jewish character, which finds free and concentrated expression within it. Anti-Semitism has deep and historical roots. Nevertheless, any flaw in Israeli conduct, which initially is cited as anti-Israelism, is likely to be transformed into empirical proof of the validity of anti-Semitism.

It would be a tragic irony if the Jewish state, which was intended to solve the problem of anti-Semitism, was to become a factor in the rise of anti-Semitism. Israelis must be aware that the price of their misconduct is paid not only by them but also Jews throughout the world.

In the world today we are witnessing a rising tide of anti-Israelism provoked by Israel’s arrogance of power, its contempt for international law and its appalling self-righteousness. (In Harkabi’s view self-righteousness is the biggest threat to Israel’s existence).

If Israel stays on its present course, the danger is, as Harkabi warned, that anti-Israelism will be transformed into anti-Semitism, leading to another great turning against Jews everywhere and quite possibly starting in America. In my view the real danger of that happening will be greatly reduced if those (mainly Westerners) among whom most of the Jews of the world live are made aware of the difference between Judaism and Zionism.

Also to be said is that the Jews of the world (those in North America and Europe especially) could and should act to best protect their own interests by distancing themselves from the Zionist state and its crimes. In the Prologue to Volume One of my book which is titled Waiting for the Apocalypse, I quote Dr. David Goldberg, a prominent liberal London rabbi, as saying the following in 2001: “It may be time for Judaism and Zionism to go their separate ways.”  Today I would say to him, it’s not “may be” time, it is time.

Awaiting your response.

Sincerely,

Alan Hart

Extended Footnote for the record: Text of my overview of 9/11

 

The starting point for any serious and honest discussion of 9/11 has to be this question: Did the impact of the planes and the heat of their burning fuel bring the Twin Towers down? If the answer is “Yes”, there’s no need for conspiracy theories. If the answer is “No”, the speculative question has to be – Who did it and how and why?

My own answer is “No”. In my analysis there’s enough evidence – visual, technical and scientific, and from eye-witnesses including fire fighters – to invite the conclusion that the Twin Towers, like Building Seven, were pre-wired for controlled demolition.

For context, the first observation I’d like to offer is that the mainstream media’s complicity in suppressing even questions and debate about what really happened on 9/11 is consistent. What I mean is that for the past 63 years – from the creation of the Zionist (not Jewish!) state of Israel mainly by terrorism and ethnic cleansing to the present – the mainstream media has been complicit in Zionism’s suppression the truth about the making and sustaining of the conflict in and over Palestine that became Israel.

Put another way, the mainstream media has been content to peddle Zionism’s propaganda lies. The two biggest lies can be summed up in a very few words:

Alan Hart -- veteran journalist and reporter

The first is that poor little Israel has lived in constant danger of annihilation, the “driving into the sea” of its Jews. The truth, as I document in detail through the three volumes of the American edition of my book Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews, is that Israel’s existence has never, ever, been in danger from any combination of Arab force.

Zionism’s assertion to the contrary was the cover that allowed Israel to get away where it mattered most – in the Western world and America especially – with presenting its aggression as self defense and  itself as the victim when it was and is the oppressor.

The second is that Israel “never had Arab partners for peace” That is complete nonsense. Just two of many examples to make the point… From almost the moment he came to power in 1951, Eygpt’s President Nasser wanted an accommodation with Israel.

He had secret exchanges with Israel’s foreign minister, Moshe Sharret, who was in my view the only completely rational Israeli leader of his time. For wanting to make peace with Nasser and the Arabs, Sharett was destroyed by Israel’s founding father and first prime minister, David Ben-Gurion…

Example number two: By the end of 1979, the pragmatic Yasser Arafat, Chairman of the PLO, had prepared the ground on his side for peace with Israel on the basis of a genuine and viable two-state solution – peace on terms which any rational government and people in Israel would have accepted with relief. But then, as is still the case today, Israel’s leaders and most of its Jewish citizens were not rational.

Prior to 9/11, the best single example of the mainstream media’s complicity in the suppression of the truth as it relates to conflict in the Middle East is Israel’s attack on the American spy ship, the USS Liberty, on 8th June 1967, the 4th day of the 6-Day war. (I was the first Western correspondent to the banks of the Suez Canal with the advancing Israelis, so I was in the Sinai desert at the time).

That attack killed 37 Americans and seriously wounded more than 90 others. If things had gone according to the plan of the man who ordered that attack, Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Dayan, the Liberty would have been sunk with all hands on board, leaving nobody to tell the story of what really happened… If it had been an Arab/Muslim attack on an American vessel, it’s reasonable to speculate that America would have resorted to a military strike, if not war, on the country or countries it held responsible.

What did President Johnson do? Out of fear of offending the Zionist lobby and its stooges in Congress, he ordered a cover-up which remains in force to this day. And the mainstream media went along with it. As it still does.

The following are my summary thoughts on the possible/probable involvement of Israel’s Mossad in 9/11. Two scenarios – A or B.

In Scenario A it’s not impossible that 9/11 started out as an Arab/Muslim idea. But even if this was the case, Mossad would have had an inside track very quickly. From almost the moment of the Zionist state’s birth, Mossad put great effort into placing agents inside every Arab regime, every Arab military and security establishment and every Arab/Muslim liberation movement and terrorist group.

Many of Mossad’s best and most effective agents were Moroccan and other North African Jews because they could pose most perfectly as Arabs. (In a moment I’ll tell you the short story of Mossad’s penetration of the Abu Nidal terrorist group).

In Scenario A the question is: Did Mossad tell anybody? My speculation is that it told some in the CIA and a few of Zionism’s neo-con associates, Jews and non-Jews, including Vice President Cheney (I call him the real Doctor Strangelove) and the likes of Paul Wolfowitz and Richard Perle. In this scenario Mossad could have asked,  “What do we do about this?” And the answer could have been something like, “We’ll use it for the Pearl Harbour-like pretext we need.”

In this scenario, 9/11, even if it started out as an Arab/Muslim idea, was a joint Israeli/Mossad and American/neo-con conspiracy.

For background a very short story about Mossad’s penetration of the Abu Nidal terrorist group. Abu Nidal was a member of Arafat’s Fatah but he broke with it when Arafat had come to terms with the reality of Israel’s existence and was preparing the ground on his side for compromise with Israel.

The Abu Nidal group, based mainly in Iraq, was responsible for the assassinations, mainly in Europe, of more than 20 of Arafat’s emissaries who were telling Western governments behind closed doors that the Fatah-dominated PLO was serious about compromise with Israel.

An investigation by Arafat and Abu Iyad, Fatah’s counter intelligence chief, subsequently revealed that Abu Nidal was an alcoholic – he consumed between one and two bottles of whisky a day, and for much of most days he was drunk, not sober. His number two was running the show and targeting those to be assassinated and directing the killing. Abu Nidal’s number two was a Mossad agent.

It was, in fact, two Palestinian students in London who were activated by the Abu Nidal group to assassinate Israeli ambassador Argov. It was that assassination attempt in 1982 that gave Israeli Prime Minister Begin and Defense Minister Sharon the pretext they needed to launch their invasion of Lebanon all the way to Beirut, for the purpose of exterminating the entire leadership of the PLO and destroying its infrastructure… Ambassador Argov survived and quite some time after the event, he indicated that he suspected Israel’s involvement (he could only have meant targeting) in the attempt to kill him.

Scenario B has to be considered because it’s a fact that some of the Arab/Muslim plotters, actual or alleged, were under surveillance by various Western intelligence agencies for years before 9/11. The agencies who were tracking them as possible/probable terrorists included the those of America, Germany and Israel.

In this scenario it’s not impossible that the idea for 9/11 was put into the heads of possible/probable Arab/Muslim terrorists by Mossad agents.

In this scenario, Mossad was actually running the show with key American neo-cons fixing things in America to make sure the attack was successful. From all that happened on the day, I’m not convinced that President Bush was in the pre-9/11 fixing loop. I think Cheney was most probably in control of the American executive oversight of what was essentially a Mossad false flag operation.

Question: How did 9/11 serve the interests of the lunatic right in Israel and its neo-con associates in America?

In their view Saddam Hussein represented the only foreseeable potential Arab challenge to Greater Israel’s continued military domination of the whole Arab world. He had to be removed. By falsely claiming that Iraq was implicated in the 9/11 attack, Zionism and its neo-con associates in America set the stage for President Bush to be conned into going to war.

As we know, Zionism’s intention to get rid of Saddam Hussein was not a secret. In 1996, under the chairmanship of Richard Perle, widely known in informed circles as the “Prince of Darkness”, American Zionism presented a policy document with the title A CLEAN BREAK: A NEW STRATEGY FOR SECURING THE REALM.

It urged incoming Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu to have no second thoughts about making a clean break with the Rabin policy of negotiating with the PLO and trading land for peace. Israel’s claim to all the land it occupied was “legitimate and noble”, the policy paper said. “Only the unconditional acceptance by Arabs of our rights is a solid basis for the future.”

After the clean break Israel would be free to shape its “strategic environment”. What would that involve? Among other things, “re-establishing the principle of pre-emption (pre-emptive strikes)… focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq… weakening, containing and even rolling back Syria, Hizbollah and Iran.”

In fact the commitment of Zionism’s in-America fixers and their neo-con associates to getting rid of Saddam Hussein goes back further than 1996. They were angry when President Bush the First refused to complete the job when he assembled a coalition to eject Iraq from Kuwait. After that Zionism’s in-America fixers and their neo-con associates needed two things – a president who was dumb enough to buy their ideas – they got that with George “Dubya” Bush; and a “Pearl Harbour” like event to trigger the action. They got that with 9/11.

But there was much more to it. 9/11 was a win-win for Zionism in a number of ways.

Predictably it provoked a rising tide of Islamophobia throughout the Western world and across America especially. In the minds of uninformed and ignorant Americans (i.e. most Americans), that in turn gave added credibility to the Zionist state’s claim to be America’s only true and reliable ally in the whole of the Arab and wider Muslim world.

As I say in the Dear America introduction to the American edition of Volume 1 of my book, when Americans asked “Why do they hate us?”, they were more or less all Arabs and Muslims everywhere. And I ask this question: What would Americans have learned if, instead of rushing to declare his war on global terrorism, President Bush had caused the Why-do-they-hate-us question to be addressed seriously?

The short answer I give in my Dear America Introduction – the long answer is in the three volumes of my book – begins with the statement that the overwhelming majority of all Arabs and Muslims everywhere do NOT hate America or Americans.

What almost all Arabs and Muslims everywhere DO hate is American foreign policy – its double standards in general and, in particular, its unconditional support for an Israel which ignores UN resolutions, demonstrates its contempt for international law and human rights conventions  and resorts to state terrorism… A truth is that for decades very many Arabs and other Muslims would, if they could, have migrated to America to enjoy a better life there.

Today, however, the number of Arabs and other Muslims who would opt for American residence and citizenship if they could is greatly reduced because of the fact, sad but true, that the monster of Islamophobia is on the prowl across the Land of the Free and licking its lips.

Unlike most Americans, most Arabs and other Muslims know that America’s unconditional support for Israel is not in America’s own best interests. In fact it’s not in anybody’s best interests including those of the Jews of the world and Israel itself.

Alan Hart Breaks Silence About 9/11 on Kevin Barrett’s Show:


Alan Hart is a veteran reporter and former ITN and BBC Panorama foreign correspondent who has covered wars and conflicts wherever they were taking place in the world and specialized in the Middle East. Hart is the author of several books including a 1984 biography of Yasser Arafat, Terrorism or Freedom Fighters: Yasser Arafat and the PLO. More recently he has completed the trilogy Zionism: The Real Enemy of the Jews, Vol. 1: The False Messiah, is a three-volume epic in its American edition.  In an article discussing his book, Hart stated that “until enough Americans are made aware of the truth of history, no American president will have the space to break the Zionist lobby’s stranglehold on Congress. He blogs on AlanHart.com.



The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on September 7, 2011, With Reads Filed under Veterans. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

21 Responses to "9/11: Open Letter Challenge to ADL’s Abe Foxman"

  1. ProtectUSA1st  September 9, 2011 at 11:07 am

    Mr. Hart, thanks to you and people like you for educating the ill-informed and those who are bombarded by Israeli Zionist Propaganda, and helping them to separate the facts from fictions.

    What Foxman and his group are trying to do is to silence people like you, and in the process to take away our “Freedom of Speech,” and I say to him “NOT A CHANCE”

    __In order to solve any problem, one has to go to the source of the problem.

    __Here, the “operative word” or the source is “Semites or Hemites.

    __What & Who are the Semites or Hemites?

    __Semites (lighter skin) or Hemites (darker skin) is the ethnicity of a group of people in the Middle-East, the entire Arabian Peninsula, North Africa and some countries in Southeast-Asia and beyond.

    __What does it mean, when someone have been accused of being Anti-Semites or Anti-Hemites?

    __It means he/she is against of all these groups of people, NOT ONLY OF THOSE OF ISRAELI ORIGIN.

    __So, why do the Israeli Zionist (the political wing of Judaism) around the world, HIJACKED THE WORD “SEMITES” and made it their “OWN AND USED IT FOR YEARS.”

    __Because the Zionist wanted to use it as their propaganda tool, since they knew the majority of people in the world are lazy to investigate the meaning of “Semites.”

  2. Zissa Ramani Facebook  September 8, 2011 at 1:20 pm

    Please vote!

    Israel vs. Palestine | Share your opinion about Gaza Strip conflict …
    http://www.israel-vs-palestine.com/ – Cached
    – Israel is ready to accept a Palestinian state – why Palestinian do not …. to die in the name of Allah, but have not learned to live for God\’s sake! …
    Israel 48.4% – Vote – Israel 51.0% – 10

  3. Gray  September 8, 2011 at 12:19 pm

    Alan, I,too wonder why you would dignify that Bigoted Pig with ANY form of recognition.

    I believe, it was Al Gore who said,;
    “You’ll never get someone to Understand something that they’re Paid to “Not Understand”

    While a confirmed Belief in the “Holocaust”® Marketing Mantra requires a unique amount of Gullibility, Self-Centeredness and Hypocrisy, the Following Observation, Re: “Howling Anti Semite”, is helpful in further neutering that, tiresome, former “Epithet of Mass Destruction”

    “AUSCHWITZ SURVIVOR: “ISRAEL ACTS LIKE NAZIS”
    http://www.sodahead.com/united-states/auschwitz-survivor-israel-acts-like-nazis/question-842601/

    “Dr Meyer also insisted the definition of “anti-Semitic” had now changed, saying: “Formerly an anti-Semite was somebody who hated Jews because they were Jews and had a Jewish soul. But nowadays an anti-Semite is somebody who is hated by Jews.”

    As to Foxman and his Hate Mongering Ilk, he’s simply preying on his very Profitable Deception Scheme to distract attention from the Hitlerian Atrocities of the Naziesque “State” to which he is loyal.

    I’m sure THIS Guy could help him Grasp what hes”Paid to “Not Understand”:

    “The Nazi-Zionist Connection”
    http://www.thefinalsolutiontoadolphhitler.com/

    “THE ZIONISTS BROUGHT US TO THE HOLOCAUST. IT IS WELL KNOWN THAT IT WAS POSSIBLE TO REDEEM JEWS FROM THE NAZIS WITH MONEY, AND SAVE THE MANY HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF JEWS IN HUNGARY…..
    THE ZIONIST LEADERS WHO NOW SIT IN GOVERNMENT PREVENTED IT”

    Rabbi Shlomo Zalman Ehrenreich (circa 1954)

  4. Zissa Ramani Facebook  September 8, 2011 at 10:52 am

    That last post was for Abraham Foxman not Allen.

    Abraham Foxman is abusive man. What happen to his military service he used to brag about? Did someone challenge him on that maybe me? We had our words before.

    Foxman I just want to say this to you and all your Zionist hardliner thugs.

    I won the war threw honor and all you lost threw corruption in my case. You showed the world what you really are human rights abuser abusing children women elderly Americans veteran families.

    What you did caused me to speak freely!

  5. Zissa Ramani Facebook  September 8, 2011 at 9:40 am

    Alan is a racist him self just listen to him babbling on
    Alan has never given thanks or support to WW2 Vets that saved Jews. Alan has never said with out GOYS Jews and Zionism would not be here.

    Here is what I believed really happen because Zionist demand for insurance scams is very important way to profit. I’M a victim by Zionist scams they raped me made millions off insurance for SEXUAL MOLESTATION SAFE-CO AMERICAN SELLS THEM. They all get % kickback even the rapist. They are corrupted violate your Constitutional rights and own Zionist Judges who sit on cases when they are closely connected to each other. They promise votes and donations to politicians. All are human rights abusers wicked mean greedy people.

    Deal of the Year: World Trade Center, New York, NY

    Weighing in at $3.2 billion, the acquisition of the 99-year leasehold of the World Trade Center was the largest of the year. “Notwithstanding the emotional difficulty of celebrating anything related to the World Trade Center is the fact that upon completion of its acquisition by Larry Silverstein, it was clearly the deal of the year for the industry, and now more than ever, a deal of [a] lifetime for Silverstein” said Ken Zakin, managing director at Insignia/ESG. [iiRealEstate]

    Silverstein Makes a Huge
    Profit off of the 9/11 Attacks

    Six months before the 9/11 attacks the World Trade Center was “privatized” by being leased to a private sector developer. The lease was purchased by the Silverstein Group for $3.2 billion. “This is a dream come true,” Larry Silverstein said. “We will be in control of a prized asset, and we will seek to develop its potential, raising it to new heights.”

    But the World Trade Towers were not the real estate plum we are led to believe.
    From an economic standpoint, the trade center — subsidized since its inception — has never functioned, nor was it intended to function, unprotected in the rough-and-tumble real estate marketplace. [BusinessWeek]

    How could Silverstein Group have been ignorant of this?

    Also, the towers required some $200 million in renovations and improvements, most of which related to removal and replacement of building materials declared to be health hazards in the years since the towers were built.
    It was well-known by the city of New York that the WTC was an asbestos bombshell. For years, the Port Authority treated the building like an aging dinosaur, attempting on several occasions to get permits to demolish the building for liability reasons, but being turned down due the known asbestos problem. Further, it was well-known the only reason the building was still standing until 9/11 was because it was too costly to disassemble the twin towers floor by floor since the Port Authority was prohibited legally from demolishing the buildings. [Arctic Beacon]

    Other New York developers had been driven into bankruptcy by the costly mandated renovations, and $200 million represented an entire year’s worth of revenues from the World Trade Towers.

    The perfect collapse of the twin towers changed the picture.

    Under a pending agreement, a developer and his investors will get back most of the down payment that they made to lease the World Trade Center just six weeks before a terrorist attack destroyed the twin towers. Developer Larry Silverstein and investors Lloyd Goldman and Joseph Cayre are nearing a deal that would give them about $98 million of their original investment of $124 million, The New York Times reported Saturday. [MontereyHerald 11/22/2003]

    Instead of renovation, Silverstein is rebuilding, funded by the insurance coverage on the property which ‘fortuitously’ covered acts of terrorism. Even better, Silverstein filed TWO insurance claims for the maximum amount of the policy, based on the two, in Silverstein’s view, separate attacks. The total potential payout is $7.1 billion, more than enough to build a fabulous new complex and leave a hefty profit for the Silverstein Group, including Larry Silverstein himself.

    As reported in The Washington Post, the insurance company, Swiss Re, has gone to court to argue that the 9/11 disaster was only one attack, not two and that therefore the insurance payout should be limited to $3.55 billion, still enough to rebuild the complex.

    Update: WTC Leaseholder May Collect Up To $4.6B

    A federal jury on Monday ruled that the assault on the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center was in fact two occurrences for insurance purposes. The finding in U.S. District Court in Manhattan means leaseholder Larry Silverstein may collect up to $4.6 billion, according to reports. [Forbes.com 12/06/04]

    The result of court ruling: Silverstein makes a huge profit off of the 9/11 attacks.

  6. Sally  September 8, 2011 at 9:04 am

    Western folk have been asleep for far too long.

    From this period in 1916-1917 the decay of parliamentary and representative government can be traced, both in England and America. If secret men could dictate major acts of American state policy and major operations of British armies, then clearly “e1ection” and “responsible office” were terms devoid of meaning. Party distinctions began to fade in both countries, once this hidden, supreme authority was accepted by leading Western politicians, and the American and British electors began to be deprived of all true choice. Today this condition is general, and now is public. Leaders of all parties, before elections, make obeisance to Zionism, and the voter’s se1ection of president, prime minister or party makes no true difference.

    In November 1917 the American Republic thus became equally involved with Great Britain in Zionism, which has proved to be a destructive force. However, it was only one agency of “the destructive principle”. The reader will recall that in Dr. Weizmann’s Russian youth the mass of Jews there, under their Talmudic directors, were united in the revolutionary aim, and only divided between revolutionary-Zionism and revolutionary-Communism.

    In the very week of the Balfour Dec1aration the other group of Jews in Russia

    achieved their aim, the destruction of the Russian nation-state. The Western po1iticians thus bred a bicephalous monster, one head being the power of Zionism in the Western capitals, and the other the power of Communism advancing from captive Russia. Submission to Zionism weakened the power of the West to preserve itself against the world-revolution, for Zionism worked to keep Western governments submissive and to deflect their po1icies from national interests; indeed, at that instant the cry was first raised that opposition to the world-revo1ution, too, was “anti-semitism”. Governments hampered by secret capitulations in any one direction cannot act firmly in any other, and the timidity of London and Washington in their dea1ings with the world-revolution, during the four decades to follow, evident1y derived from their initial submission to “the web of intrigue” spun across the Atlantic between 1914 and 1917.

    After 1917, therefore, the question which the remainder of the 20th Century had to answer was whether the West could yet find in itself the strength to break free, or prise its po1itical 1eaders 1oose, from this double thrall. In considering the remainder of this account the reader should bear in mind what British and American politicians were induced to do during the First World War.

    http://knud.eriksen.adr.dk/Controversybook/TheWebofIntrigue.htm

    Hart stated that “until enough Americans are made aware of the truth of history, no American president will have the space to break the Zionist lobby’s stranglehold on Congress.

    Britons too Mr Hart, Britons too!!

    Controversy of Zion is akin to reading a book of horrors!

    For nothing is secret that shall not be made manifest; Neither anything hid, that shall not be known and come abroad – Luke 8: 17.

    http://knud.eriksen.adr.dk/Controversybook/Epilogue.htm

  7. Charlotte NC Bill  September 8, 2011 at 1:35 am

    15 of the 19 “hijackers” got there student visas through direct CIA intervention through the Consulate in Jedda..Several are still alive…They were building a narrative for the “patsies”..( much like sending Oswald to the USSR..Lee Harvey, a patriot, thought he was spying on them…building a narrative..his CIA handler did a fairly good job…)…There were no hijackers…the cockpit door of flt 77 was never opened after takeoff….which never hit the Pentagon…..This was a total false-flag waged by Mossad and the assets that they cultivated over decades in DOD, CIA, FAA…etc…

  8. Rehmat  September 7, 2011 at 7:12 pm

    Sorry to say Alan, you’re talking to a 10ft. thick Wailing Wall. As a member of the so-called ‘Bible’s Chosen People’ – Abe Foxman has God-given right to say anything he or fellow Zionist Jews want to say.

    YES – Moses’ law do “has at its core a set of moral values and ethical principles” – but then its followers were known as Hebrew tribes and not Jews. The later cult was invented a century ago, according to Jewish historian Shlomo Sand.

  9. Paul  September 7, 2011 at 7:04 pm

    “It would be a tragic irony if the Jewish state, which was intended to solve the problem of anti-Semitism, was to become a factor in the rise of anti-Semitism.”

    If Mr McDonagh3 submission is any indication, I’d say the tipping point has almost been reached. Come the next false-flag, it will become an avalanche. We’re all in for a bumpy ride.

  10. Derek  September 7, 2011 at 6:45 pm

    Alan knows his stuff! Love his articles.

  11. william f mcdonagh3  September 7, 2011 at 6:02 pm

    dont even waste your time trying to talk sense into this traitor,hes just another spy terrorist posing as an american,hatred of the jews is a natural reaction to a tribe of racist liar war criminals waging total war on america

  12. Chris  September 7, 2011 at 3:22 pm

    “Judaism has at its core a set of moral values and ethical principles.”

    Sorry but Judaism is based on the Talmud and the Zohar. Read the Talmud lately? It has no moral values and ethical principles.

    Zionism is a shield for Talmudic Judaism.

    • Charlotte NC Bill  September 8, 2011 at 1:42 am

      I agree completely….just tribal self-worship and hatred of the goy..

    • DaveE  September 8, 2011 at 10:04 pm

      Right you are, pal! Evil is evil, period.

    • Mike Delaney  September 9, 2011 at 11:31 pm

      Exactly, glad to see someone pointed that out!

      http://www.911missinglink.com

  13. Brian  September 7, 2011 at 1:01 pm

    Alan, I’m glad you wrote the letter, hopefully it will get linked to by websites such as whatreallyhappened.com, sott.net and thetruthseeker.co.uk. They might not publish it at the popular informationclearinghouse.info. I write this because I got banned from posting there due to placing these links http://www.bollyn.com/solving-9-11-the-book and http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=622552

    in two articles on one day even though I have occasionally placed them in the comment sections at the website. The text and the free book provide the evidence that the Mossad and their pals, primarily Jewish Zionists, did 911.

    It’s great someone with your stature has the guts to strongly suggest the Mossad did 911. Based on the evidence I don’t believe any of the Muslim patsies got on the airplanes and I really don’t think 911 started as a Muslim plan. I don’t believe even very angry Muslims would actually try and murder a few thousand people in the United States. The Mossad blows up Gentiles all the time and occasionally Jews to gain sympathy from the people of the world.

    • DaveE  September 8, 2011 at 10:07 pm

      Couldn’t ‘ave said it bettter, m’self.

  14. Sam  September 7, 2011 at 12:17 pm

    Okay. Hart’s article is great, until he mentions the Holohoax. I wish he could go to Germany and lighten their hearts about that.

  15. Sam  September 7, 2011 at 12:16 pm

    Tried to leave a post, but it timed out. So I’m testing.

  16. Sam  September 7, 2011 at 11:57 am

    Excellent article!!

    • Speed of Dark  September 7, 2011 at 9:41 pm

      Remember, remember the 11th of September…
      the diversions, treason, and plot.
      I know of no reason why the Zionist treason
      should ever be forgot.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH
From Veterans Today Network