9/11 for Dummies: Top Five 9/11 Facts Everyone Should Know

Using Common Cents and Telling the 9/11 Facts

 

by Johnny Punish

 

In speaking with my fellow Americans about 9/11 ten years after the fact, I have found that many, sadly and unfortunately, have either forgotten what happened that terrible day or have purchased the propaganda delivered to them by their own “trusted” main stream US media. 

What especially concerns me is the progressive dummying down of our youth; specifically those under 20 years old who either hardly remember that day as it happened or where not even born yet.  These people must rely on what is told to them by “trusted” sources.  In other words, our American youth are getting an even  larger dose of propaganda then we did shortly after the event and it’s troubling.

As it stands, another lost generation can only accelerate the USA and it’s continued devolution towards Idiocracy.  In my view, this is NOT in our best interests and so I write this “9/11 for Dummies” post in hopes that those with limited time to invest in truth can get enough of the facts to at least ask “Hey! What really happened that day?”

First, why is truth important?

Well, as most of the intelligencia already know, the American public is being farmed by the globalists posing as American firsters in their fancy $ 3000 suits with American flag lapel pins.  We see them everyday on their respective party TV channels selling the snake oil. This has been going on for decades.  It’s nothing new.

What is new is that we, the people, now have access to information that was once hidden from us and thus are in shock mode as we get pummeled by reality as each layer of fakery is uncovered.  It’s destabilizing as if we’re on a boat in rough seas ready to vomit and realize, oh oh, no Dramamine; only truth to set us straight.

Okay, so what’s at stake here is the future because the human world is teetering on failure with overpopulation while gorges on mother nature’s resources.   In the meantime, globalists continue the rapture with no consequence.

So for us who live on edges of their empire, the question is simply “Should we allow the globalist to decide who lives and dies or can we, the global peoples, rise up and decide our own fate?”.  It’s a heavy question and I offer no answer except to ask you to share these 9/11 Top Five Facts with your neighbors and friends and help get the facts out so that, at the very least, when we completely give up our lives to the globalists, we do so with eyes wide open and not as cows at the slaughter house.

Oh, before I launch the Top Five Facts, please know that I am not a conspiracy theorist. I have no cards in the confusion game of misdirection.  Facts are facts!  At the end I will note my opinion and then you can decide for yourself.   So here we go……..

1. WTC Building 7:  Why did it fall?

This 47 story building fell on the same day as the twin towers yet it was NEVER hit by a plane.  There was a small fire with the cause never fully explained.  Then, in the early evening it collapsed. The video of the collapse shows it going straight down.

The 9/11 Commission does NOT have much to say about this  collapse and the main stream media never mentions it.  Moreover, most Americans do NOT even know that it fell and that it’s even part of that terrible day we  call 9/11.  On this one, 2 plus 2 does NOT equal 4.

No plane hit the building, period!  Why did it collapse?  How?  Has the red flag been raise?  Yes, by  many yet the general public is amazingly unaware.  Thus, this fact may go down and get lost in time.

The Common Cents Punish Opinion: In my view, this is key evidence that 9/11 does not pass the smell test.  But that’s my opinion only.  What’s yours?

2. Pentagon:  No Plane Debris

Witnesses at the scene who were in the building and had to crawl during the chaos report NO sightings of any plane debris; no cockpit, engines, seats,  nothing.

Worse, the Pentagon is the most secure building in the world and in 2001, that would mean hundreds of cameras on full time recording events outside  the building, not only by the Pentagon itself but by the myriad of buildings around the Pentagon yet NOT one video of a plane flying extremely low and hitting the building, not one!  Really?

All we have is an explosion and hole with no evidence of a plane hitting the building.  These are the facts.

Worse, professional pilots including ex-Air Force pilots report that there is no way they could have flown that plane that low at that alleged speed and hit  the building.  No way! Yet the 9/11 commission says it was an Arab pilot who could hardly fly a Cessna who did the deed.

Finally, the only evidence that we do have of a plane that was hijacked comes from a phone call from Barbara Olson to her husband Theodore Olson.  Yet, when we take a look at who these people are, it’s clear that they are NOT  average Americans.

Barbara Olson was a Republican Conservative employee of Fox News and her husband, Theodore (Ted), was a member of the Bush Administration as United States Solicitor General from 2001-2004.

In legal terms, these people are NOT exactly at arms-length and under cross  examination would be deemed biased and not credible witnesses yet these two are the only connection we have to a plane hitting the Pentagon.

The Common Cents Punish Opinion:  Who wrote this script?


YouTube - Veterans Today -

Free MP3 Download of 9/11 Truth Rock

3. Shanksville:  No Plane Debris

There is no evidence that a plane hit the ground.  There is just burned dirt and shrubbery. The first videos from the scene are no longer available and so  we’re left with what the government says about this thing.

According to the Shanksville Mayor Ernie Stull “There was no plane,” he told German television in March 2003.  He said “My sister and a good friend of mine  were the first ones there,” Stull said. “They were standing on a street corner in Shanksville talking. Their car was nearby, so they were the first here —  and the fire department came. Everyone was puzzled, because the call had been that a plane had crashed. But there was no plane.”

There are family members of those on the plane that said they received calls including the infamous “Let’s Roll” line yelled by one of the passengers but where are the bodies?  No bodies?  No recovery of seats?  engines?  Nothing!

The Common Cents Punish Opinion:  Again, no evidence that a plane crashed except what the government says happened.  This from the same government that gave  us WMD’s in Iraq.  Come on! why should I believe a known liar?  Give me evidence!

4. WTC Towers:  Planes and Collapse

At 8:46 a.m. the government says five hijackers crashed American Airlines Flight 11 into the World Trade Center’s North Tower (1 WTC) and at 9:03 a.m. another five hijackers crashed United Airlines Flight 175 into the South Tower (2 WTC).

Average Joe Blow witnesses on the ground say they saw planes hit the building and clearly, from the video evidence from both main stream media and some amateurs on the ground, we do see planes hit the buildings.  But the plane markings are NOT clear and thus we are NOT sure if those planes were in fact the planes that the government said were flights.

What we do know is that Larry Silverstein procured a lease for the WTC in July 2001 and won the bid despite  being outbid by a rival.  And it just so happens, Larry Silverstein also had the lease on Building 7.  His insurance policy calls for 3.55 billion to be paid out.

The Common Cents Punish Opinion:  I think the planes hit but it may not have been the planes that they said hit.  And did the buildings fall because of the planes or were they “pulled”.  Many in the field of engineering say they were pulled.  In my view, the government is notorious for cover-ups. They are the most secretive entity on the planet.  There is plenty of evidence that the government has kills their own to complete a mission.  So it’s sensical to question their account of that terrible day.  I don’t trust them at all!  Why should I?

5.  9/11:  The Perpetrators

According the government, the leader of the 9/11 attack was former CIA agent Osama Bin Laden and the mastermind operations manager was Khalid Sheik Mohamed.  They said they were 19 hijackers involved in the attacks and the government sponsored 9/11 commission concluded so.

As anyone who understands crime investigations knows, one must follow the evidence.  And the evidence says a lot that the government does NOT say.

First, the alleged evil doers are dead and their Al-Qaeda organization is decimated.  More, they don’t appear to have benefits from the attacks except notoriety.  Who did benefit from the attacks were the war profiteers and anti-civil liberties groups. In the days after 9/11, the government waged 2 major wars and reduced the American public from a once free society to a complete controlled corportocracy.   In the wars, trillions of dollars were made. The evidence is everywhere. The global beneficiaries are everywhere in plain sight while the American peoples are saddled with a broken economy, no relative freedom, and a bleak future.

The Common Cents Punish Opinion:  So who benefited again?  Oh that’s right, not us! And why is it that Zionism has it’s fingerprints everywhere from Douglas Fife, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Larry Silverstein et al…?   Is it me or does everyone who benefited from 9/11 happen to be associated with global Zionism?


ABOUT THE AUTHOR: Johnny Punish is a musician, artist, entertainer, businessman, investor, life coach, and syndicated columnist. Educated at University of Nevada Las Vegas, his articles appear in Veterans Today, MunKNEE and his Johnny Punish blog. His art music is promoted by Peapolz Media Records and played on net radio at Last.fm , EarBits and more.

Resources: StoreMusicVideosAmazonYouTubeTwitterFacebook

2011 copyright – Johnny Punish


Land Gigs



The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on September 9, 2011, With Reads Filed under Veterans. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

50 Responses to "9/11 for Dummies: Top Five 9/11 Facts Everyone Should Know"

  1. monster beats  October 27, 2011 at 2:43 am

    Juicy Couture, Lyle as well as Scott, Rob Lauren, Franklin as well as Marshall … We are likewise incredibly stockists of UGG ” booties ” in addition to endorsed authorised retailer we all only promote genuine GHD hair straightener. We stock Argyle, Bailey, Cardy, Sheepskin, …

  2. Mike Delaney  September 14, 2011 at 4:54 pm

    “Remember 9/11 and the USS Liberty, done by the same COWARDS!”

    Absolutely true as shown in this movie:

    http://www.911missinglinks.com

  3. 911Truth controlled demolition  September 13, 2011 at 5:37 pm

    baby if you say that Building 7 “was apparently demolished because of fears that it would collapse unexpectedly.” ….. so this would take weeks of setting demolition charges , so that is a proof of foreknowledge, or make-it-happen false flag inside operation

    nanothermite high tech military explosive was found in WTC dust.

    steel cannot melt in office or kerosene fires.

    cellphones could not have worked then, and at that altitude

    speculations:
    Shanksville : a fake plane was shot down, and a missile fired into the ground

    flights might have been faked out, and planes were very likely remotely controlled

  4. Rob  September 12, 2011 at 8:51 am

    I would be interested in your feedback from this.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9U8CZAKSsNA = Testing & Fabrication

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/49624448/Jeff-Prager-Nuclear-911-2011-Detailed-Exposure-of-the-Thermonuclear-Demolition = Theory/Hypothesis

    http://www.nucleardemolition.com/files/Download/GZero_Report0.pdf = Evidence/Proof

  5. Brakatak  September 11, 2011 at 11:54 am

    Osama did not take responsibility for it. The CIA started making bogus tapes with Osama months after the incident and the supposed Osama in those tapes started taking responsibility. As a matter of fact, as soon as the 911 incident happened, Osama denied having anything to do with it. Maybe he didn’t live much longer after the 911 incident. I do not have the links with me on hand, but he had a serious kidney problem and there are reports that he died around December of 2001. I saw a photo of the Osama on a later tape and definitely he is not Osama. As a matter of fact I even showed it to friends of mine. If Osama had done the deed, he would have taken responsibility immediately. He would have told the world why he did it and he would have laid his case out. I don’t think he was a coward and a fool. Why not let the world know his grievances? Is he just attacking America for the sake of killing Americans? This is senseless. Whichever way I look, I am not seeing Obama and his cronies. I am seeing Israel together with elements in the US establishment. It is not the first time Israel has attacked any US interest, just think of the USS Liberty. Wouldn’t like to get into this but you can check it out. . If people want to believe Osama was recently killed in Pakistan, that is fine. Personally I do not because there is so much Government lying with that incident too. We are dealing with ruthless people in the financial and political establishment. At a dinner given one time after the invasion of Iraq, George Bush was making fun of the weapons of mass destruction he couldn’t find in Iraq. He was looking under the table and laughing to his guests, ” no weapons of mass destruction here” and looking somewhere else (can’t recall what) laughing, “no weapons of mass destruction here either”. His guests were laughing too. He had no regrets on what he did, on all the carnage, on all the loss of life, no regrets on anything. I guess that is what happens when a soul has been totally sold to the devil. He is only a gopher, imagine the people that control him. Also, sometimes it is hard for people to understand the scale of media deception. The criminals own the media so what can be expected? Anyway, gotta run. I have a lot of chores to do. I left some links below and maybe you can have a look at them. Make up your own mind. The links are hugequestions(dot)com and 911missinglinks(dot)com In my opinion, these 2 classics really shread the official explanation to pieces and point the finger where we least expect. I hope there are more people like you who have an enquiring mind and who would like to make sense of all that’s happening.

  6. jerry bolduc  September 11, 2011 at 10:54 am

    ‘n I forgot to mention…if you receive payments from the government related to military service, you’re part of this “military-industrial” complex!! that info will quickly separate the wheat from the chaff!

  7. Brakatak  September 11, 2011 at 10:21 am

    The last news I got, it was sold to China; Taiwan didn’t want anything to do with the whole damn thing …LOL. We will never know all the details of everything these criminals do, just enough for convictions.

  8. jerry bolduc  September 11, 2011 at 10:14 am

    Does Congress Yahu! ?

  9. Gordon Duff  September 11, 2011 at 9:49 am

    ML
    They were offloaded at a small airstrip, which took about half an hour, they were executed, thrown into the back of 3 garbage trucks and hauled to the military base in Harrsisburg, from where they were in barrels and shipped to Egypt.

    this is just a guess….how good a guess?

    People will squirm.

    The real plane was sold to Taiwan.

  10. jerry bolduc  September 11, 2011 at 9:32 am

    HOWDY trowbridge…so the heroic “let’s roll” gang has morphed into “7 CIA agents”? Like the 7 dwarfs? Maybe YOU should take a few days off yourself; take in a flick or two. Whaddya say? Big airplanes and there engines don’t disappear into nothingness friend…never have, and never will!

    I wanted to let the dear readers know that the money we give to Israel each year is in the form of VOUCHERS…redeemable only thru purchases of US made armaments. Aid to Israel is nothing less than a US taxpayer subsidy to the US “military-industrial complex”. It’s not about the “Jews”…the real Jews are being scape goated and sacrificed just as readily as the Gentile by the fake Jews (Rev 3:9) and by their equally culpable zionist Christians!

    It’s all about WAR folks…the “blame the Jews” thing is merely a distraction to keep you looking in the wrong direction!

    A few months ago Netanyahu gave a speech to Congress…and just like trained circus seals they bobbed up and down clappin’ their flippers together at every opportunity. Congress loves Netanyahu (a pure Caucasian if I ever saw one) because he’s a warmonger and that’s good for the arms manufacturers and, of course, war profiteers like the “too-big-to-fails”! Those are the people who have bought off Congress and attempted to rob us of our Liberty. Bush wasn’t kidding when he said “the terrorists hate our freedoms”! And they’re doing everything they can to destroy our freedoms entirely!!!!!

    Now that you know who is really to blame, isn’t it about time we started pushing back?

    jerry bolduc

  11. ML Pittsburgh  September 11, 2011 at 9:29 am

    Wow, reading all of this is a 1st for me. I suppose it’s plausible, nothing should surprise me anymore. My one question? If there were no plane parts for Flight 93 then where/what happened to the plane and people of Flight 93? Obviously people on that flight lost their lives, I don’t think that is being questioned…am I right about that? Are you saying their bodies weren’t found or they were not on a plane? If this is all true what a huge hoax and sad, tragic loss of life. Oh wait, one more question. I thought Osama and his cronies took credit for these events so how is that explained? I’m not being a skeptic here, just trying to make sense of this new hoax idea that I was never aware of before now.

  12. Bill Seifert  September 10, 2011 at 9:25 pm

    Truer words were never spoken.

  13. Brakatak  September 10, 2011 at 1:59 pm

    I presume Sir, you are talking about the documentaries I mention here? If you are, you are entitled to the way you want to do things and to whatever conclusions you want to draw, however, I still invite people to look at the documentaries and then draw their own conclusions. If no one wants to accept anything there, it is fine. You have had a chance to see the facts of the matter, facts which the Jewish owned media still hide from us. I will simplify things. Israel did 911 and it was nothing more but a ‘false flag operation’ meant to get the USA to do the dirty work for them in the Middle East. Seriously, if after looking at the documentaries, you can’t see ……………..THIS!!! Well! We do not need to know all the details of an incident. Yes, you asked in your first post here, where did this flight go ? Where did that flight go? We do not know and it is not necessary to know. What is necessary right now is for people to look at what we know and move from there, educate others if that is all you can do. If you believe the official explanation Sir (please, I apologize if I am wrong), you are complete ‘toast’.

  14. grandma caesar  September 10, 2011 at 11:59 am

    ??? our own government (nist report) says it “collapsed primarily due to fire”.

    “apparently demolished”?

    there ain’t two separate truths here…

  15. Trowbridge Ford  September 10, 2011 at 11:34 am

    I have never even seen much less been influenced by official documentaries about 9/11. Nor have I been the slightest impressed by posters who claim that there were no planes involved, the Pentagon was hit by a missile, there were no telephones, pilots or highjackers on the planes, John Wheeler was killed because he was going to blow the whistle on the ‘inside job’, etc.

    And I need no introduction to SDI, Gordon, as I learned about by my endless probing – what ultimately got the screwballs in Washington so concerned that they decided I was either someone’s spy or a whistleblower working for a domestic or foreign one.

    For more, see the 16-part series that cryptome.org posted about glimpses of America’s man-made disasters. Its administrator, John Young, thought that he could help nail me as either one, and then hoped I would go down the drain in the sting that the FBI arranged with the Swedish Security Service that I was ‘Jihad’Jane’s Islamic lover who was planning to kill islamophobe cartoonist Lars Vilks.

    I need no help from people who are only interested in entrapping and/or discrediting me to suit Big Brother.

  16. BrklynMd3  September 10, 2011 at 10:58 am

    You say “It was apparently demolished because of fears that it would collapse unexpectedly.” and you do not even realize what you are saying. Ok, lets say you are right… They feared it would collapse and so they demolished it. Ok… so for a building like that, it would take at least a MINIMUM of a MONTH to get that ready to demolish and fall in it’s own foot prints… So how did they do it in 6 or so hours??? Also if you look at demolished buildings, they are all brought down the same way. The inside is made to collapse first and drag the walls in and the walls fall on top of the pile. Go look and see this WAS IN FACT the case with building 7. So again, how did they do it in the 6 or so hours??? Keep your mind open and don’t listen to what the government, myself, Johnny Punish, or anybody else tells you something and go look it up for your self (like I do) and you will find the truth… and the truth is 9-11 was a inside job!

  17. Gordon Duff  September 10, 2011 at 10:50 am

    Trow,
    If you want, I can give you the number of folks who worked on SDI and can be more than a bit exacting on how this was done.
    I hope your physics background is better than mine…which is only fair at best.
    Where things really broke open, for those who have “access” is when Khalezov brought up Brazil’s nuclear program.
    This was leaked and confirmed but reburied some time ago. However, it proved his bona fides.
    g

  18. Gordon Duff  September 10, 2011 at 10:46 am

    Bill,
    Is Trow talking about Barb Olsen?
    Ouch.
    I think I saw her at Wendy’s yesterday.
    g

  19. Gordon Duff  September 10, 2011 at 10:44 am

    my big concern is for the hijackers themselves
    how would you feel if people kept telling you that you are dead?
    they should sue
    g

  20. Gordon Duff  September 10, 2011 at 10:29 am

    The real video was 1991 taken a a birthday party.

  21. Brakatak  September 10, 2011 at 9:45 am

    Gentlemen, please see as well Eric Hufschmid’s video, ‘Painful Deceptions’ and Mike Delaney’s ‘911missinglinks’. Both can be found respectively at hugequestions(dot)com and 911missinglinks(dot)com Both are top quality documentaries, so please, if possible make an effort to see them. I see the facts are very clear against the official explanation and no amount of intellectual contortions will do justice to what actually transpired that very fateful day.

  22. Trowbridge Ford  September 10, 2011 at 8:24 am

    If building inspectors are convinced that a building is in danger of imminent collapse, it doesn’t take much to bring it down.

    The 19 suicide bombers on the planes, five on the first three planes, and four on the last, are all quite dead, and they could have used someone else’s documents and name, or it is just another person with the same name that you are alluding to.

    The more disturbing dancers were those people, apparently Israelis, filming and dancing when they saw one of the planes hit the WTC on the Jersey side of the Hudson, and another crew at the Brooklyn Bridge. They obviously were informed about about what planned, and were exstatic when it happened.

    As for the 7/7 bombing, I am just too tired to go through it all now after an afternoon of house painting, so you will just have to take this, and feel free to ask any questions you have about it;

    The Perfect Conspiracy: The London Bombings
    by
    Trowbridge H. Ford

    Whenever any high-profile, violent event occurs – whether it be the assassination of some important politician, an unexpected conflict, or a sudden, devastating act of terrorisim – everyone immediately wants to know its causes, key players, and consequences. The problems occur for those needing to react or those just seeking to understand because they bring to the process too much conceptual baggage they have amased along the way, and take too many short cuts in seeking solutions. Despite what counterterrorist experts claim about wanting to make what they are doing predictable – some kind of science – almost all these events are highly individualistic ones because of the specific context in which they occur, the unexpected action by some previously uninvolved party, and the most likely occurrence of some mistake or oversight along the way.

    In today’s world of asymetric warfare, actions come so thick and fast that we have developed abbreviations to denote them – like 9/11, 3/11 and 7/7 – as if they were as common as neighborhood dispensers of modern man’s essentials – and all kinds of items – acronyms, abbreviations, tradecraft, jargon, new facts, speculation and the like – are used to describe and define them. Then all observers bring to their tasks all kinds of assumptions and biases which both shape and distort what they have been trying to understand and explain. It is apparetnly the only way we can keep from going completely mad and impotent in today’s unpredictable, violent world.

    One only has to look at any day’s headlines to see what this approach to events produces in the way of content and understanding: “Youths Lost to Islam Became ‘Suicide’ Bombers in London”, “9/11 Attacks Were Inside Jobs”, “Dr. Kelly Killed Himself”, “Mossad Pulls Off Another False Flag Operation in Gaza”, “Al-Qaeda Strikes Gold Again”, “House Inquiry Reconfirms Oswald JFK’s Assassin”, “FRU Refuses to Come Clean about ‘Psyops’ in Ulster”, “KGB Planned to Kill Politician in Scandinavian False Flag Move”, “Mossad Had Most to Gain in Attacks of 9/11”, and the like.

    The trouble with such articles is that they are based upon a level of information, prejudice, and uncertainty which would not be permitted in other stories. All these incidents involved governments whose security services must be protected at all costs, so information is only disclosed or leaked which helps promote explanations which serve their interests. The services of other governments give a wide berth to the process in order to receive the same privilege when they are in center stage though all the world’s leading security services are intimately involved in all kinds of ways when anything important happens. As a result, claims of incompetence, corruption, and bad luck by officials are very much at a premium in explanations. It is the culprits who are usually guilty of oversights, manipulation, and good fortune in such accounts.

    As a result, the mainstream media generally discuss such events as tragedies, surprises, and accidents while sites on the internet are prone to see them as the result of conspiracies. Actually, they are usually the result of cock-ups by authorities, plans or counterterrorist operations which have gone wrong because of blunders. Even when deadly conspiracies are plotted, they generally go astray even if they are carried out by official agencies because of some oversight, accident, or more pressing matter. In sum, the suspicion that conspiracies have occurred should be the last option that officials and their critics resort to rather than the first when such events occur.

    Having followed this advice in examining the underground and bus bombings in London on July 7th, I have come to the conclusion that it is one of the best examples of a conspiracy conceived, and carried out in a long time – or, if you prefer, Britain’s counterterrorists effected one of the biggest cock-ups of all times. Conspiracies and cock-ups are inversely proportional except when some plot is prevented, and the concepts can be used to calculate the performance of either the terrorists or the counterterrorists. In this case, the Leeds sleeper cell must be given total marks, and their protagonists among the authorities virtually nothing.

    To understand why Britain’s counterterrorists did so badly, one must go back to the end of the Cold War when MI5 aka Security Service – unlike what was happening to the FBI in the States – was given new powers, personnel, and privileges to combat the terrorists, especially the Provisional IRA, in Northern Ireland. In 1993, MI5’s new T Branch was given overall control of the kingdon’s counterterrorism efforts, much to the expense and chagrin of Scotland Yard’s Anti-Terrorist Unit aka SO-13, and the Royal Ulster Constabulary’s Special Branch. Whitehall wanted results in combating the Provos, and was not too worried about legal niceities along the way, providing that it only had to answer to the Home Secretary for its performance.

    And the changes did not come a minute too soon as the PIRA was in the midst of its most deadly bombing campaign ever throughout the kingdom. Its temporary ceasefire in December 1990 after Mrs. Thatcher stepped down as Prime Minister was not followed by the expected permanent one but a renewed campaign of terror when the UK could least afford it because of its involvement in the Gulf War. On February 7, 1991, the Provos fired three mortar rounds at No. 10 Downing Street – reminiscent of how it had obliterated the Newry Police Station, and nearly killed the former PM back in the mid-1980s -setting off a wave of tit-for-tat killings between republicans and loyalists which would only end when the Provisionals declared a “complete cessation of military operations” on August 31, 1994.

    During the bombing campaign, Sinn Fein and the PIRA Council were badly divided over its conduct. While SF leaders Gerry Adams and Martin McGuinness were talking to MI6’s Michael Oatley in the hope of establishing real peace, the Council, especially Sean Kelly, was most desirous of pressing ahead with the war. The bombing in London’s Soho, Oxford Street, and the Baltic Exchange, the Warrington Gas Works, its shopping centre, the City of London’s NatWest Tower, St. Ethelburga’s Church in Bishopsgate, six no-warning bombs in North London, and many others seemed to be Kelly’s handiwork, and little wonder that T Branch was most desirous of catching him red-handed – what could only be achieved by penetrating the PIRA Council back in Belfast.

    At the same time, Special Branch officials back in Northern Ireland, especially those in the Stevens Inquiry investigating British collusion by the Army’s Force Research Unit (FRU) in sectarian murders, were finally regaining control of the spiraling terror by getting the Ulster Defence Association’s Johnny ‘Mad Dog’ Adair, commander of its ‘C’ Company aka Ulster Freedom Fighters (UFF) in the Shankill Road, to resume its dirty work for it. (For more on this, see my article “Just Who Is Lord Stevens of Kirkwhelpington?”) While UDA’s intelligence chief Brian Nelson was being scapegoated for all the killings in which the FRU participated, and UDA members, especially John Gregg, who wanted to kill Sinn Fein leaders seeking a peaceful settlement were being imprisoned, Adair’s assassins so attacked innocent Catholics in West Belfast that the PIRA Council had to increase its efforts to protect Catholics back home, operations at the expense of the bombing campaign on the mainland.

    After five unsuccessful attempts to assassinate Adair, the UFF, RUC, and some of Stevens’ people were finally able to take Kelly’s measure. With a meeting of Adair’s people scheduled on October 23, 1993 in his office above Frizzell’s fish shop on the Shankill Road – though the personnel prudently were advised to stay away in case there were any unexpected fireworks – Kelly and Thomas Begley walked into the shop, dressed in white coats to make it appear that they were making a delivery, with a time-fused bomb, set to destroy the above office, after they had given a warning, and everyone had made their escape. Unfortunately, the bomb exploded while still in Begley’s possession, killing him and nine others when the building collapsed.

    The massacre, especially after Adair committed one of his own in retaliation, was a great boost to the peace process, and a big set-back for Kelly and his bombing campaign. While Kelly received nine life sentences for his blunder – something he accepted would make him be seen as a terrorist for the rest of his life – the British and Irish government soon agreed to the ‘Downing Street Declaration’ which established the principles for the making of a settlement, and the Provisional’s ceasefire followed. It was then basically a question of making it permanent, with the PIRA decommissioning its weapons, and joining the peace process.

    The only problem is that the Provisionals never followed through, and Stevens, though ultimately the Met’s Chief Commissioner, especially since his immediate subordinate Hugh Orde was now head of the province’s new police force, the PSNI, never lost sight of it – particularly now that Kelly and Adair had both been released from prison under the terms of the Good Friday Agreement. According to Sir John, Kelly was constantly looking for the right opportunity to resume his paramilitary career, especially his
    bombings. “With the IRA ceasefire,” Mark Urban wrote in UK Eyes Alpha, “some senior policeman began to worry that the Security Service would now be searxching for new territories to conquer.” (p. 281) Stevens was dedicated to making sure that it did not happen.

    Consequently, while a series of operations were occurring to make the Provisionals finally decommission their heavy weapons and come to the peace table – the alleged PIRA spying ring at Stormont Castle after provincial government had finally been restored, their alleged raid on the files at the Castlereagh police headquarters in East Belfast on St. Patrick’s Day, 2002, and the Northern Bank raid around Christmas, 2004 – British police, especially the Met, made sure that MI5’s efforts in countering international terrorism, G Branch’s responsibility, always had a domestic, hopefully Ulster, component.

    When British subjects Asif Hanif and Omar Khan Sharif went to the Occupied Territories in late 2003, and blew themselves up in Mike’s Bar in Tel Aviv, killing and wounding several Israelis, Stevens and other senior policemen were immediately reminded of what Kelly and Begley had accomplised in Frizzell’s fish shop a decade before, and worried about what this indicated for the future, particularly in light of the domestic feedback the war on terror was creating. This was after T Branch had made a complete cock-up out of what psychopath Kamel Bourgoss, an asylum seeker from Algeria, was attempting in his Manchester flat – what it claimed was a laboratory site of a ricin-based WMD attack but turned out to be, after a massive roundup of would-be terrorists, only the murder site of Special Branch detective Stephen Oake.

    To get G Branch interested in the domestic dimension of its pursuits, T Branch, thanks to apparent input from the Met, then tried to make out that Muslims youths at the PC UK Internet Cafe in Crawley were part of an international conspiracy which was circling the world (Operation Crevis). The plot concerned the “Portland Seven”, especially Haroon Rashid Aswat, wanting to go to Pakistan so that they could make contact with Al-Qaeda in order to fight for it in Afghanistan; the buying of a large amount of fertilizer which could be made into bombs, and the storing of it near Heathrow by alleged Canadian terrorist Mohammad Monim Khajawa; the recuitment of Muslim youth, and then sending them to Afghanistan for terrorist training by fiery Muslim radical Abu Qatada, close associate of his counterpart in Spain, Abu Dahdah; and many of the youth who frequented the Crawley cafe. This started in November 2003, just after Jeffrey Leon Battle had been sentenced in Portland to 18 years in prison for trying to fight for foreign terrorists. (For more on this, see my article “War on Terror Sucks More Still” in the Trowbridge Archive.)

    The plot turned out to be a utter fiasco, given the fact that it just diverted international counterterrorists away from what Al-Qaeda was plotting in Madrid on March 11, 2004. Still, G Branch, especially agent ‘Gould’, tried to reclaim something from it by getting the youths – Jawad Akbar, Omar Khjam, Anthony Garcia, and several others – to flee to Pakistam as if they were guilty of something. Stevens joined the call by shouting out to all who would listen that a domestic terrorist attack was not a question of if but when. The FBI did what it could by trying to connect Portland lawyer Brandon Mayfield to 3/11. Unfortunately for G Branch, the Met, and the Bureau, none of it worked, as the youths stayed put and avoided indictments, as did Khajawa and Mayfield.

    The trouble with this domestic overkill over the issue of domestic, Muslim terrorism was the terrible blowback it created. Some Muslim youths became convinced that the security authorities were dedicated to proving, one way or another, that they were domestic terrorists. This gave them a calling that they had never had before – what became ever more attractive as the illegitimate invasion of Iraq turned into a civil war which could promote the expelling of the West from the Middle East. Stevens’ shouts became a self-fulfilling prophecy.

    In this context, Mohammad Sidique Khan, a friend of one of the Luton youths arrested during Operation Crevis, put togther a conspiracy which would give the Met Commissioner and his colleagues all they bargained for, and more. Khan, after recruiting Shehzad Tanweer, Hasib Hussain, and Germaine Lindsay to join the operation, put together a plan which would supply them with everything they needed for a suicide mission while betraying nothing which would elicit any suspicion of them or it. Their families even had no idea as to what they were up to, as they never discussed anything with them, or conducted any necessary acts anywhere near them. They observed a tradecraft which the Agency and SIS have rarely, if ever, emulated. It was something the MOSSAD would be proud of.

    After visits to Israel and Pakistan to determine just how bad the plight of Muslims is, and the apparent merits of such a plot, Khan’s group decided upon a London attack while a G8 meeting was taking place in Edinburgh. The timing seemed ideal because the Joint Terrorist Analysis Center had just agreed to reducing the threat level of terrorism from “severe” to “substantial”, though it added, to please the just-retired Met Commissioner apparently, that the threat of a domestic terrorist attack was growing because of the occupation of Iraq.

    It assumed that domestic Muslim terrorists, some 200 according to Stevens, still did not have the means of carrying out their designs. To make sure of this, the Secretary of State for Northern Ireland Peter Hain ordered on June 20th the reimprisonment of Kelly because of his alleged resumption of terrorist activities, thanks to advice provided by Stevens’ closest police associate, PSNI Commissioner Orde, though no details were given to justify the action. Counter terrorist officials were apparently convinced that Kelly was the most likely supplier of what potential Muslim terrorists needs, and with him being back in prison, it would not happen.

    7/7 proved them totally wrong. The four suicide bombers followed a most carefully thought-out plan down to the last detail. Setting out from home as if they only intended to spend the day in the capital – what required no tearful, revealing good-byes – they then joined up at Luton where they picked up their backpack bombs which had probably been put together in a car-rental vehicle which they duly paid the parking fee for before embarking. They wanted to make sure that no possible surveillance would spot any irregularity, and inspect it. They bought return tickets in order to prevent similar suspicion and inquiries.

    Once they reached London – at the lowest state of alert in a long time, thanks to the G8 summit, a terror alert exercise in the underground which would inconvenience the least amount of people, and the counterterrorists most concerned about keeping Israeli Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu informed of rather than the general public – the suicide bombers had a cakewalk in the capital. The exercise, unlike the ones NORAD was conducting during the 9/11 attacks to steal a march on the would-be highjackers, was just a coincidence.

    The simultaneous explosions in the underground made up for the fact that not more people were killed and injured. Under the circumstances, 55 persons killed would be almost as effective as killing 3,000. And they did not shout Muslim oaths when they set off the bombs only to embarrass counterterrorist officials more when they true identities were discovered at the site because of the papers and plastic they carried with them – what are the least likely items destroyed in explosions. The later blast on the bus, intended just to spread more panic, proved successful, though Germaine Lindsay may have been rushed into setting it off prematurely for fear that he was being discovered, and stopped. His was apparently intended for the rescue teams making their way to the victims at King’s Cross.

    When the full extent of the conspiracy was revealed, all the counterterrorists could do was to plead surprise, and grab for straws – try to hook up an Egyptian biochemist who returned to Cairo as the plot’s mastermind, see that Pakistani authorities finally arrested Haroon Rashid Aswat in the hope that he could be fitted out for the role, and now re-stage underground attacks at Shepherd’s Bush, Warren Street, and Hackney Road Stations, and on a No. 26 bus nearby in minute miniature to keep the plan of making the best out of a terrible situation going. In sum, the answer to a dreadful conspiracy by your worst enemies is a most devious one of your own.

  23. Vox  September 10, 2011 at 7:30 am

    Something I NEVER see mentioned is when after the towers came down all three zionist news networks showed live shots from Tel Aviv with the Israelis dancing in the streets and tearing up American flags. Later it was claimed that the video was of Palestinians then later it was “what film?” until now it’s “WTF is Vox blabbering about now?” I REMEMBER THAT VIDEO CLEAR AS DAY AND IT INFURIATED ME THEN AND INFURIATES ME NOW!!!! Our only friend in the ME my ass!

  24. adeUK  September 10, 2011 at 5:27 am

    How do you explain the “suicide bombers” some of which are still alive and well ?

    Also you being both posts in a confrontational and argumentative manner intended to irritate and introduce irrational talking points. One might argue deliberately to divert the thread to pointless argument and away from rational analysis.

    Insults followed by diversion and division Hmmmm where have I seen that before ?

    What is your take on the 7/7 bombings in London ?

  25. adeUK  September 10, 2011 at 5:11 am

    “It was apparently demolished because of fears that it would collapse unexpectedly.”

    How do you explain a truck full of explosives and detonators / det cord and a crew to fit it being on hand to do the job at such short notice in the middle of New York. Just by co-incidence ?

    If the building was so clearly about to collapse how was the work crew persuaded to enter the building and work quickly under pressure avoiding the hazards associated with an unstable structure ?

    How do you explain the world speed record breaking effort to wire the building for such a tidy demolition ?

  26. fiko  September 10, 2011 at 3:43 am

    God will show you soon that we Moslems aren’t murder neither OBL or anyone of those allegedly hijacker were ever involved in this crime act and you will be surprised once day that only your own people did 11/9 (cia and mossad) and only they have benefited of it. We are only the victims like American average people too. I hope we will still see this time.

  27. Charlotte NC Bill  September 10, 2011 at 1:55 am

    “Collapse unexpectedly”?? Do you believe in the tooth fairy also? .Flt 93 was shot down by a NORAD fighter flying outof Fargo, ND…the “let’s roll” crap is propaganda…Barb Olson never called anybody..Ted lied….we’ve known that a long time…Flt 93 was supposed to fly into WTC 7…Embarassing to have a bldg rigged to explode though…investigators might take notice and unravel the official 9-11 narrative…flts 11 and 175 converged over the privatised Stewart Air Field….They very well could have been switched…the turned off transponders are another clue…this was an electronic hijacking that piggybacked onto the war games that were going on that day..One of which involved “the simulated hijacking of 11 passenger aircraft…” Just like 7/7 and Norway…Read up..

  28. Trowbridge Ford  September 10, 2011 at 1:52 am

    Thanks, guys, for all your irrelevant whataboutery regarding my response to the article’s claims.

    The article essentially claimed that there were no airplanes involved in the attacks or that they were not the ones the government claimed because there was little or no evidence to support such claims – concluding falsely that all your favorite Jews or their supporters were responsible for the attacks when, in fact, it was the doing of DCI George Tenet and his supporters who hoped to catch the 19 highjackers red handed, and had them over to the officials in Washington as a cause of war against Al-Qaeda.

    When the highjackers turned out to be suicide bombers, and hit the WTC and the Pentagon, the officials in Washington decided to make the Agency cockups look like a new Pearl Harbor, and added Iraq to their war on terror.

    For more, see my double article in Eye Spy’s Issue Eight right have the tragedy.

    And I am still me, not some imposter in support of Zionism, as I have already indicated on another thread, raising the probability that the WTC disintegrated under high energy levels from exploding neutron bombs, what most likely came from Israel, and posters have grabbed for all kinds of straws to avoid the likely consequences of, if true.

  29. Louise  September 9, 2011 at 9:45 pm

    I believe that flight 93 was blown up over Shanksville which would have sent the debris over many miles.

  30. Kathy  September 9, 2011 at 8:48 pm

    SPLC along with ADL are “Hate Groups” and the True Terrorists!

  31. Gordon Duff  September 9, 2011 at 7:58 pm

    i invterviewed khalezov on beruit
    you talk about ‘lebanon’s top explosive expert’
    khalezov says it is nuke

    the blast is estimated between 15 and 30kt

    as i remember, rdx is basically the same crap inside hand grenades, claymores and blocks of c4 but in varying mixtures

    add petn and you have a landmine

    what you are describing would fill an oil tanker, not a small truck

    g

  32. Gray  September 9, 2011 at 7:40 pm

    CLARIFICATION :

    Not “consistent” but among the Range of Sophisticated Explosives available almost Exclusively to Israel & the U.S.

    “Exotic High Tech Explosives Positively Identified in World Trade Center Dust”

    http://www.ae911truth.org/fr/nouvelles/41-articles/204-exotic-high-tech-explosives-positively-identified-in-world-trade-center-dust.html

    “Ordinary thermite burns quickly and can melt through steel, but it is not explosive. Nanothermite, however, can be formulated as a high explosive. It is stable when wet and can be applied like paint.”

    Thanks again for your contribution,
    Gray

  33. Gray  September 9, 2011 at 7:32 pm

    Excelllent, Detailed Analysis consistent with:

    “CSI Forensics Proves Who Killed US Marines – Evidence shows Israel is Guilty! “
    http://65.118.73.164/cache/forensics.htm
    
By Ralph Forbes
    General Kelly
    The Beirut bombing that killed 241 U.S. Marines was “the largest non-nuclear explosion in history,” according to General Paul X. Kelley, past-Commandant of the Marine Corps.

    U.S. military intelligence’s equivalent of CSI (Crime Scene Investigators), using the most sophisticated, high tech diagnostic tests, forensically examined evidence found at the scene of the terrorist explosion that killed 241 U.S. Marines in Beirut – They know where the bomb came from, but the stunning truth has been suppressed for 23 years. Even without full disclosure of those test results, experts on explosives and terrorism believe more than enough proof exists to establish who is guilty. The truck that blew up the Marine Barracks was loaded with 666 pounds of enhanced RDX “rag bombs.”
    
The Israelis call RDX, “rag bombs,” because they use it to kill “rag-heads” or to blame bombings on “rag-heads.” Also, the “safest” way to handle it is in “rags” that have been soaked in RDX and dried. Their planted bombs often look like a pile of dirty “rags.”

The only active sources of RDX in 1983 were the United States, Canada, France, Sweden, China – and Israel.

    Forensic Evidence Points to Israelis Guilty of Massacre of U.S. Marines!
    The RDX that killed our Marines was “enhanced” with propane gas and primed with PETN boosters or detonation cord, according to Yosef Bitar, Lebanon’s top explosive expert. Bitar is an expert; between 1975 and 1983 he had defused 1,870 bombs! Gas-enhanced RDX bombs are exotic devices. Only explosive experts with a great deal of practical experience can prepare a gas-enhanced bomb. The bomb must be prepared so that first the gas cylinders are exploded to create a cloud in which the RDX is detonated. The gas cloud “amplifies” the exploding plastic charge.

    “Beirut Marine bombing was Mossad False Flag Operation”

    http://rehmat1.wordpress.com/2009/09/15/beirut-marine-bombing-was-mossad-false-flag-operation/
    EXCERPTS “I reported that Marine had been sent there to become the focus of a major incident. The Mossad is to arrange for a number of our Marines to be killed in an incident that will be blamed on Arabs! This will be used to inflame American public opinion to help us lead into war including ultimately nuclear war,” – Dr. Beter, a Pentagon analyst, November 3, 1982.

    241 fellow Marines who fell victim to Israeli false flage operation – just like Israeli attack on USS Liberty to make Muslims and Arabs look as enemies of Americans.”CONTINUED

    Israeli Mossad acknowledged that it had prior information on these terrorist activities – but its chief Nahum Admony (former member of Haganah Jewish terrorist militia. In September 2006, he chaired the investigation committee to find out the reasons behind Israeli military humiliation at the hands of Hizbollah in 34-day war) decided not to warn Israel’s ally in details: “No. We are not going to protect the Americans. They’re a big country. Send only the regular information.” Israel took a similar position on September 11, 2001 attack on WTC and the Pentagon – while asking prime minister Ariel Sharon to cancel his schedule travel to Washington.

    Many Thanks,
    Gray

  34. DDL  September 9, 2011 at 6:29 pm

    Dear Mr Ford
    Analyses of air and dust samples from the 9/11 WTC (“”Ground Zero””) particle plume reveal the unexpected presence of many particles smaller than 1 micron (ie, nanoparticles). Among the smaller GZ particles, the distribution of their sizes clearly indicates that they were caused not by pulverization but by widespread molecular dissociation, which occurs only at energy levels higher than what could result from a collapse or even what can be achieved through the use of any conventional weapons technology.
    When matter is elevated to temperatures hotter than the surface of the Sun, molecular dissociation results. Molecular Dissociation (MD) is easy to understand once we realize that there are four (4) states of matter: solid, liquid, gas, and plasma. Just as ice has trouble surviving in water or steam, molecules have trouble surviving in plasma, which is highly energetic (ie, extremely hot). When molecules dissociate, they leave behind loose atoms and fragments of molecules. In other words, extremely small particles. In this sense, it is correct to think of molecular dissociation as disintegration.
    When molecular dissociation occurs, covalent molecular bonds are broken, but atomic bonds survive. The resulting particles — loose component atoms and fragmented molecules — are far tinier than what occur in any conventional explosive event, including the most violent volcanic eruptions: There is no known “pulverization” mechanism which can account for so many unnaturally-tiny nanoparticles at Ground Zero. There are also other highly unconventional aspects to the devastation of the 3 WTC skyscrapers at Ground Zero, all of which indicate the release of an enormous amount of excess energy (heat), which has never been accounted for:
    So once we confirm evidence of widespread molecular dissociation having occurred at Ground Zero in New York City, we have a very strong indication that only exotic, unconventional weaponry could have released that much extremely — unimaginably — high intensity energy which suddenly appeared just as the towers disintegrated from top to bottom. This understanding means we cannot blame the highly unconventional Ground Zero devastation on thermite/thermate/superthermate and “controlled demolition” any more than we can blame it on “jet fuel” or “box cutters”.
    Few civilians have had much experience observing the effects of a small thermonuclear detonation in an urban setting. So if they saw one, and were given some other explanation for its strange appearance, would they know they’d been deceived? How? What does a region of plasma look like, and how does it behave at the boundary between 2 regions, one where molecules exist and a more energetic one where they don’t? And what does that boundary look like?
    So when we see pictures of chunks of the walls of the towers trailing roiling plumes of particles behind as they fall after having been blown outward from the perimeter columns, we can draw conclusions from such observations. First of all, the pressure of the air (or plasma) inside the tower was much higher than that of the air outside the tower. Second, the exterior walls had suddenly become very hot, apparently on the order of thousands of degrees or more. Given how heat disperses, and the radial symmetry about the vertical axis to the destruction of the towers, it is therefore reasonable to deduce that temperatures along a thin line within the core of the towers (think of the lead inside a wood pencil) were very high indeed, very much higher than the tens of thousands of degrees at which molecular dissociation occurs.
    Get a clue – there were no highjackers (where’s the proof), there were no flights (where’s the proof)
    WTC7, the possible planning/command center with its plethora of federal agents, was special. No nukes, at least not above ground. I suggest that it was NOT a faux pas that Silverstein, on public TV, admitted they “pulled it” with conventional demolition! But the regime tried to “take it back” when a public outcry began over that admission!

    WTC3, the 22-story Marriott Hotel, may have also had a nuke vaporize most of its top floors, or this one may have been destroyed by falling debris? Let us analyze this. A picture of WTC3 after the first WTC2 collapse, but before WTC1 collapse, indicates WTC3 had its own “underpowered” internal nuclear spherical blast wave damage it, a la WTC6: Did the nukes going off in WTC 2 vaporize these chunks before they hit WTC3? Did the nukes of WTC1 cause the outer shell of WTC3 to later vaporize? Did after-collapse nukes do this? Should we call these “cleaner nukes” in analogy to how the regime sends in its “cleaners” to remove evidence after one of their agents has performed some nefarious deed?

  35. Jupiter  September 9, 2011 at 6:18 pm

    Two key points proving demolition:

    a. no steel-framed building has EVER been taken down, especially in 6 or 7 seconds, by fire alone! The bldgs remain erect, only they are gutted from the fire.

    b. Victor Thorn’s ‘9-11 On Trial’: “Witness 5: The melting point of steel is 2,795 degrees F. The highest temperature you can achieve by burning hydrocarbons in the atmosphere [exploding jet fuel] without pressurization or pre-heating of the air is 1,517 degrees F, and that’s when you have pre-mixed fuel and air – the kind of blue flame you get with a gas stove.”

    “Question: Would the type of flames indicative of a structural fire be hotter or cooler than what you’ve described?”

    “Witness 5: Diffuse flames of the type you have in building fires are far cooler…” page 45.

    http://911research.wtc7.net/talks/towers/text/index.html

    http://www.serendipity.li/wtc5.htm

    Steve S, is this meant to scare us? Potok can go soak his biased head if he cannot look at facts.

  36. Steve Scroggins  September 9, 2011 at 4:37 pm

    A lot of “Free Thinkers” here… Mark Potok of the Southern Poverty Center says yall are amenable to conspiracy theories. In fact, SPLC would say you’re probably right wing extremists and perhaps members of “hate groups.”

  37. Marc C. Daniele  September 9, 2011 at 3:20 pm

    @Trowbridge Ford,

    Wow I didn’t think anyone could be so completely ignorant as you!

    First of all the engine found from the world trade center plane was not even that of a 767! See the pictures!

    Second, what Mr. Punish seems to forget to mention also! Who was actually arrested on that day? Israeli’s with explosives in white vans, false passports, 4 stuffed in socks, and filming the planes with forehand knowledge, and celebrating. Who also happened to fail polygraphs, then went back to Israel and said how they were there to document the event! You should see the NJ Police Report! I have!

    Third, let’s not forget about the BBC reporting, live on air that Building 7 had fallen nearly a full half hour before it did! Not to mention Sliverstein (yes I know it’s spelled wrong) said to “pull it” in an interview! And again that’s not to mention the billions this scum profited from that day!

    Fourth, how about the fact that 7 of the so-called hijackers are still alive today, and that another one died about a year before that day! That’s 8 of 19!

    Fifth, how about the fact that in 2001 cell phones could not be used on airplanes, had no seatback phones, and it has been proven that Olsen received one call for 0 seconds that day!

    I could go on “Trowbridge Ford” because there is much, much more, but it seems to me that you are either very, very ignorant, or just one of the “TROLLS” hired by Israel to keep people from learning the real truth!

    Go back and do some REAL research!

    WAKE UP US “Republic”!

    Remember 9/11 and the USS Liberty, done by the same COWARDS!

    Restore the US Constitution!

    US “Republic” First, Always!

    US Army Veteran,
    Marc C. Daniele
    Herculaneum, Mo.

  38. Kelderek  September 9, 2011 at 3:13 pm

    Spending time on this nonsense on the 911 government conspiracy is a distraction and divides us, the only real opposition to the current corrupted system. Ron Paul is far from perfect, but because he wants to disengage the US from the Middle East especially Israel, it is enough to gain my vote. If you can recommend to me any other viable anti-Zionist candidate for the government, I am all ears.
    VT website passing visitors may think the conspiracy writers are kooks and decide to base their judgment on the entire website on this nonsense and leave VT for good. But there are authors here with important and excellent articles, which the sleeping Americans should know about it.
    Without a concrete, verifiable, undeniable proof, the 911/government involvement hypothesis competes side by side with UFOs, evil vaccines and haunted castles, which are proper for children fantasy books, not a political analysis site.

  39. Umm Sulaim  September 9, 2011 at 3:09 pm

    I have come across statements from people who share TF’s views that building 7 was demolished to prevent its collapse. That is sufficient acknowledgement of government involvement.

    How do we know the other buildings were not put through the same measure? With a secretive, lying government, we simply don’t.

    Umm Sulaim

  40. Gaz McGazza  September 9, 2011 at 2:54 pm

    nobody has EVER debunked the Truck Bombs…
    “It was apparently demolished because of fears that it would collapse unexpectedly”
    Lmao… takes a month to rig a building half that size….

  41. Gordon Duff  September 9, 2011 at 2:48 pm

    Trow
    Which is, in itself, proof the other two were brought down by controlled demolitiion also.
    g

  42. DaveE  September 9, 2011 at 2:30 pm

    Are we sure this really is Trowbridge Ford? The real TF has written some good stuff so it’s a little hard to see how his brain could have turned into bathtub caulk so quickly.

    Looks to me like a very unsophisticated “intelligence” operation from zionist HQ.

  43. wolf  September 9, 2011 at 2:22 pm

    “It was apparently demolished because of fears that it would collapse unexpectedly.”

    Excuse me Tollbridge, “it was apparently demolished”???
    Yes. Totally. And obviously by means of controlled demo which would have taken weeks if not months to prepare. Can’t you connect the dots?

    If WTC7 was wired for demo, then ALL THREE BUILDINGS WERE. 100% certain. Period.

  44. Derek  September 9, 2011 at 2:11 pm

    Lol. He lives under a rock. Why was all the CCTV footage confiscated? Planes can be remotely controlled. Oh so many questions yet you follow blindly.

  45. RJ  September 9, 2011 at 2:02 pm

    Who let Trowbridge post articles on VT? He’s a fool.

  46. Truth Seeker  September 9, 2011 at 1:41 pm

    You should spend 911-11 watching Loose Change and Fable Enemies instead of excepting the Government Kool-Aid.

    …and how did the demolition crew make it up the burning building 7 in the 8 hours after the first plane hit to wire it for perfect demolition?

    Why is there no video of any of the allege 19 Arabs in the Respective Airports from where the planes took off on 911, when there were video cameras everywhere in those airports?

    …and how about the 40+ videos ceased near the Pentagon by the FBI that have never (and will never) be released to the public?

    As far as CIA agents, they dispensable when they aren’t willing to go along with the program.

  47. Jamil Hanna  September 9, 2011 at 1:04 pm

    A question I raise:why the investigators into 9,11 attacks did not interrogate the families of the 14 Saudis perpetrators?they are young in the early twenties and it is likely their families have a lot about who were behind them.

  48. Dr. Ed Kendrick  September 9, 2011 at 12:52 pm

    ReDiscover911.com Mission Statement closely follows your discoveries, Johnny.

    Those who collaborate to keep the cover-up in place deserve to be brought before grand juries for likely indictment–and have their assets seized using RICO (racketeering) statutes.

    Cheney and Rumsfeld have slipped to reveal Flight 93 was shot down. Silverstein is reported to have consulted his insurance company about the possibility of claim payout should they implode Building 7. There wasn’t time to deliver an order for explosives in the chaos that day–much less get the explosives strategically placed.

    Troll-bridge Ford is too obvious–and clumsy in his obfuscation and attempts to distract from the obvious: A Jewish crime network and criminal zionist fingerprints are all over the crimes of 9/11–and the subsequent cover-up by media. Yes, I also know that traitorous gentiles served as shabbas goyim in the conspiracy.

    Check out ReDiscover911.com and look up a most interesting article written by Allan Sherman in 1973 entitled: WHY LIES ARE BETTER THAN THE TRUTH

  49. Brett  September 9, 2011 at 12:31 pm

    Johnny, another home run……….The biggest fraud ever perpetrated? With an ‘ally’ like I$rael, we certainly don’t need enemies…………

  50. Trowbridge Ford  September 9, 2011 at 12:21 pm

    What a load of utter fantasy, Johnny Punish!

    I know of no one who claims that WTC7 was hit by a plane, so what is your point?

    It was apparently demolished because of fears that it would collapse unexpectedly.

    And the 19 suicide bombers are still the perpetrators – what the Israelis apparently counted on to trigger the
    collapse of the WTC, and Tel Aviv has been benefiting ever since.

    AA Flight 77, with Barbara Olson on board along with three CIA agents to subdue the alleged five highjackers, as the plane made its way to LA: if she and the Agency agents were not on board, whatever happened to the fight and its 65 passangers?

    So if no plane hit Shanksville, whatever happened to UA Flight 93, especially the 7 CIA agents who were on board, and apparently subdued the five suicide bombers, but not in time to prevent the fatal crash?

    If the flights from Boston were not the ones which hit the WTC, what ones did, and where did AA Flight 11, and UA Flight 175 disappear to?

    Why don’t you get lost for the weekend, perhaps punishing yourself during the break, rather than subject us to your rubbish

You must be logged in to post a comment Login


TOP 50 READ ARTICLES THIS MONTH
From Veterans Today Network