US appellate judge Bybee declines to testify on interrogation memos he approved at Justice Dept.

0
482

WASHINGTON – U.S. Circuit Judge Jay Bybee has declined to give Senate testimony on the memos he approved while at the Justice Department that supported harsh interrogation methods for detainees.

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., chairman of the Judiciary Committee, announced at a Senate hearing Wednesday that Bybee turned down his invitation to appear. Leahy did not provide details.

Leahy had asked Bybee to explain his views on the legality of the extreme interrogation methods and the role he played

     

Bybee, a judge on the California-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, headed the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel from October 2001 through March 2003. He signed off on four memos related to the policy.

During his 2003 confirmation hearing, Bybee declined to answer questions about his work in the Legal Counsel’s office.

In the summer of 2004, Leahy noted, more than a year after his confirmation, a memo signed by Bybee on Aug. 1, 2002, became public.

The memo interpreted the federal anti-torture statute as only prohibiting pain equivalent to "the pain accompanying serious physical injury, such as organ failure, impairment of bodily function, or even death."

"There is significant concern about the legal advice provided by OLC while you were in charge, how that advice came to be generated, the considerations that went into it, and the role played by the White House," Leahy wrote.

         

ATTENTION READERS

We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed
In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.

About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT.
Previous articleJudge in Calif. proceeds with Laos overthrow case
Next articleReport: Medicare fund is 8 years from insolvency