Last month back the Army general of U.S. forces in Northern Iraq ordered pregnancy banned among military personnel in his command, under threat of court-martial and jail time. The order went into effect on Nov. 4, and was first reported by the military publication Stars and Stripes. Under crushing criticism, and objection from four U.S. female Senators, Cucolo has backed off, but still says he will use "lesser, nonjudicial punishments" to enforce his order. From the Times and Crooks and Liars:
General Backs Off Court-Martial Threat for Pregnant SoldiersBy JIM DAO
It didn’t take long. Just three days ago Stars and Stripes broke the story that the commander of United States forces in northern Iraq had threatened to court-martial military personnel under his command who became pregnant, or impregnated someone else. The order applied also to married couples who are deployed together.
But on Tuesday, the commander, Maj. Gen. Anthony A. Cucolo III, told ABC News that he would use only lesser, nonjudicial punishments to enforce the order. Courts-martial can lead to loss of all benefits and jail time.
“I see absolutely no circumstance where I would punish a female soldier by court-martial for a violation … none,” General Cucolo told ABC News.
General Cucolo, who commands 22,000 soldiers in northern Iraq, said that seven soldiers, four of them women, have been punished under his order, which was issued in early November. Those punishments mostly involved letters of reprimand.
General Cucolo’s order lists about 20 activities punishable by court-martial, including entering a mosque without orders, drinking alcohol or using illicit drugs, and photographing detainees.
But it was the prohibition on pregnancy that caused controversy, with critics saying it discriminated against women and could lead to hasty abortions.
Some legal experts and soldiers, however, said it seemed a reasonable way to prevent a depletion of the ranks. Typically, troops who become pregnant in a combat theater are sent home.
“I’ve got a mission to do, I’m given a finite number of soldiers with which to do it and I need every one of them,” General Cucolo told the BBC in explaining the order.
The Pentagon itself put out a news story on Tuesday afternoon explaining the policy and the general’s decision to avoid court martial for pregnancy.
Eugene R. Fidell, who teaches military law at Yale Law School, said General Cucolo probably never intended to court-martial a pregnant soldier and just wanted the threat to discourage pregnancies.
“The question is, is it reasoanble?” Mr. Fidell said. “And I think it is. It’s at the intersection between personal autonomy and military exigencies. What he’s reacting to is the extraordinary difficulty of filling vacancies in a war zone.”
##
We ran a story on Dec. 20th, when General Cucolo first banned pregnancies under his command. Well, he took it a step further.
The crazy that comes out of the military sometimes is breathtaking. I wonder if this General is connected to the C-Street gang known as The Family?
VELSHI: Twenty-two U.S. soldiers serving in northern Iraq have just gotten two new orders from their general. Rule one, don’t get pregnant. Rule two, don’t get another soldier pregnant. Break those rules and you will get court-martialed. The general, Anthony Cucolo, e-mailed CNN explaining his decision, telling us — quote — "I need every soldier I have got, especially since we are facing a drawdown of forces during our mission."
LISA BLOOM, CNN LEGAL ANALYST: In my view, this is patently unconstitutional, Ali. There’s a long line of U.S. Supreme Court cases that says that the right to be a parent is a fundamental constitutional right. That means it’s a right of the highest order and worthy of the highest protection.
Now, the military does get great deference from the courts, which means, if they want to redeploy a pregnant soldier, as they often do, they can do that in the way that a private employer could not do. But they cannot threaten with court-martial or jail a pregnant woman or a man who impregnates a woman. In my view, this will not pass any kind of constitutional muster.
—
THOMAS KENNIFF, FORMER ARMY JAG OFFICE ATTORNEY: Well, first of all, I think he may be going into hiding soon, because I think this is a situation where you have a commanding general who is in charge of his own fiefdom in northern Iraq and probably thought that he could do this with the consent of his own JAG, who may — we use a term in the military when JAGs are referred to as going native, meaning that they’re basically acting as yes men for the commend.I agree with Lisa fully that there are serious constitutional problems with this and military laws and military orders are not exempt from constitutional scrutiny. The Supreme Court weighs in on military case laws and military decisions all the time.
So, you know, I think when this gets more exposure, as it is now through the media, there’s going to be some major fallout here, because there’s no question in my mind this is a major violation of the right to privacy.
UPDATE: John Amato:
Four Democratic female Senators have demanded that this horrific policy by General Cucolo be rescinded immediately. This is insane stuff.
Four Democratic senators have written a letter to an Army general in Iraq asking him to rescind an order that threatened to court martial female soldiers who become pregnant while deployed in the war zone.
The policy by Maj. Gen. Anthony Cucolo III was instituted on Nov. 4, but it has triggered outrage among women’s groups since it became publicly known in recent days."We can think of no greater deterrent to women contemplating a military career than the image of a pregnant woman being severely punished simply for conceiving a child," the senators wrote to Cucolo today. "This defies comprehension. As such, we urge you to immediately recind this policy."
The letter was signed by Sens. Barbara Boxer of California, Barbara Mikulski of Maryland, Jeanne Shaheen of New Hampshire, and Kirsten Gillibrand of New York.
UPDATE II: Now the general is saying that no soldier will actually be court martialed.
The commander who instituted a policy cracking down on pregnancy among soldiers defended it Tuesday as necessary to maintain troop strength, but said no soldier would ever be court-martialed for violating the directive. The policy — which would punish soldiers who get pregnant or impregnate another soldier — was included in Maj. Gen. Anthony Cucolo’s orders to troops regarding conduct while deployed under his command in northern Iraq.
Cucolo said that as a former public affairs officer, he realized when he created the rule that it would be controversial for those outside the military.
"When I wrote this, I knew there would be public interest, and I also knew there would be a period of time when many folks would opine and give their own personal thoughts and blog about it. And I am fine with that. That’s America," he said. "But I was also willing to deal with this attention because this is important. I am responsible and accountable for the fighting ability of my task force. I’ve got to take every measure to preserve my combat power, and that’s the reason."
Yes General, we will blog about it and you got your fifteen minutes of shame, but in the end it’s just another attack on the ladies when all is said and done no matter how you care to view this issue. I didn’t realize that serving in battle was a lot like "Animal House."
ATTENTION READERS
We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully InformedIn fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.
About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy