NATO struggling to fulfill commitments for more troops in Afghanistan – Washington Post

1
564

Okay.  Here is the situation and it is not what we were told would happen by our friends.

NATO either cannot or will not send the troops to Afghanistan that they promised Obama that they would send.  There is stiff opposition among the European governments to any increase in troop levels for this unpopular war.  Simply stated, their citizens do not support the war.  There is no surprise there.

Now, here is the question.

Why are European governments sensitive to the demands of their citizens on this issue of ‘soldiering up’ for an unwanted war and our government just simply plods along?

Why are we sending our sons and daughters, grandsons and grand daughers  into harm’s way against the will of the majority of our people?

What is the lesson to be learned here?

The Washington Post article is entitled NATO struggling to fulfill commitments for more troops in Afghanistan .

Read between the lines.  The article should be entitled “European governments teach American politicians about responsibilities to their constituents”.

Maybe Donald Rumsfeld was wrong.  Maybe “Old Europe” has lessons to teach us after all!

CWO3 Tom Barnes, USCG (Ret.)

ATTENTION READERS
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy