ALAN SABROSKY: Zionism Unmasked — The Dark Face Of Jewish Nationalism


The differences between Jewish nationalism (Zionism) and that of other countries and cultures

Israeli prime minister Binyamin Netanyahu once remarked to a Likud gathering that “Israel is not like other countries.” Oddly enough for him, that time he was telling the truth, and nowhere is that more evident than with Jewish nationalism, whether or not one pins the “Zionist” label on it.

Nationalism in most countries and cultures can have both positive and negative aspects, unifying a people and sometimes leading them against their neighbors. Extremism can emerge, and often has, at least in part in almost every nationalist/independence movement I can recall (e.g., the French nationalist movement had The Terror, Kenya’s had the Mau Mau, etc.).

But whereas extremism in other nationalist movements is an aberration, extremism in Jewish nationalism is the norm, pitting Zionist Jews (secular or observant) against the goyim (everyone else), who are either possible predator or certain prey, if not both sequentially. This does not mean that all Jews or all Israelis feel and act this way, by any means. But it does mean that Israel today is what it cannot avoid being, and what it would be under any electable government (a point I’ll develop in another article).

The differences between Jewish nationalism (Zionism) and that of other countries and cultures here I think are fourfold:

1. Zionism is a real witches’ brew of xenophobia, racism, ultra-nationalism, and militarism that places it way outside of a “mere” nationalist context — for example, when I was in Ireland (both parts) I saw no indication whatsoever that the PIRAs or anyone else pressing for a united Ireland had a shred of design on shoving Protestants into camps or out of the country, although there may well have been a handful who thought that way — and goes far beyond the misery for others professed by the Nazis;

2. Zionism undermines civic loyalty among its adherents in other countries in a way that other nationalist movements (and even ultra-nationalist movements like Nazism) did not — e.g., a large majority of American Jews, including those who are not openly dual citizens, espouse a form of political bigamy called “dual loyalty” (to Israel & the US) that is every bit as dishonest as marital bigamy, attempts to finesse the precedence they give to Israel over the US (lots of Rahm Emanuels out there who served in the IDF but NOT in the US armed forces), and has absolutely no parallel in the sense of national or cultural identity espoused by any other definable ethnic or racial group in America — even the Nazi Bund in the US disappeared once Germany and the US went to war, with almost all of its members volunteering for the US armed forces;

3. The “enemy” of normal nationalist movements is the occupying power and perhaps its allies, and once independence is achieved, normal relations with the occupying power are truly the norm, but for Zionism almost everyone out there is an actual or potential enemy, differing only in proximity and placement on its very long list of enemies (which is now America’s target list); and

4. Almost all nationalist movements (including the irredentist and secessionist variants) intend to create an independent state from a population in place or to reunite a separated people (like the Sudeten Germans in the 1930s) — it is very rare for it to include the wholesale displacement of another indigenous population, which is far more common of successful colonialist movements as in the US — and perhaps a reason why most Americans wouldn’t care too much about what the Israelis are doing to the Palestinians even if they DID know about it, is because that is no different than what Europeans in North America did to the Indians/Native Americans here in a longer & more low-tech fashion.

The implications of this for Middle East peace prospects, and for other countries in thrall to their domestic Jewish lobbies or not, are chilling. The Book of Deuteronomy come to life in a state with a nuclear arsenal would be enough to give pause to anyone not bought or bribed into submission — which these days encompasses the US Government, given Israel’s affinity for throwing crap into the face of the Obama administration and Obama’s visible affinity for accepting it with a smile, Bibi Netanyahu’s own “Uncle Tom” come to Washington.

The late General Moshe Dayan, who — Zionist or not — remains an honored part of my own Pantheon of military heroes, allegedly observed that Israel’s security depended on its being viewed by others as a mad dog. He may have been correct. But he neglected to note that the preferred response of everyone else is to kill that mad dog before it can decide to go berserk and bite. It is an option worth considering.

Alan Sabrosky (Ph.D, University of Michigan) is a ten-year US Marine Corps veteran and a graduate of the US Army War College. In December 1988, he received the Superior Civilian Service Award after more than five years of service at the U.S. Army War College as Director of Studies, Strategic Studies Institute, and holder of the General of the Army Douglas MacArthur Chair of Research. He can be contacted at [email protected]

Also See:

ALAN HART: Zionism Unmasked – A fairy tale that’s become a terrifying nightmare

JEFF GATES: Zionism Unmasked — Serving the Great Deceiver

MAIDHC Ó CATHAIL: Zionism UnmaskedChutzpah, thy name is Zionism



    Ever time I’ve challenged ANY of America’s Parasitic and Traitorous Glut of Frothing Zio-Nut Propagandists to the following question :

    “Name ONE other Country that has, repeatedly elected Proven and Documented Mass Murderers (Sharon, Shamir, Begin, etc) to the HIGHEST Office in the land?”

    The “Responses” I’ve gotten have ALWAYS been Apoplectic, Off-Topic, Insult Ridden

    AS ADDITIONAL ‘CAGE-RATTLER”; (Re: “What other country would…..?”

    You can ALSO ask:

    “So what does that Fact say about the Mentality of Israel’s Electorate?”

    CAUTION: Like other Lower Primates…….Zionists WILL Throw their Feces!!!!!

  2. The victim of abusive behaviour is very often responsable of what befalls him/her, because the ABUSE was not met with a strong reaction, the same moment it started, to make it STOP at once. However, the ZionTalmudicMafiaDons, taking advantage of the open societies, which are UNAWARE of the racist-secretive-selective-exclusive-talmudic laws of the auto-labelled “chosen ones”, were ALL (east/west-north/south)caught off guard by the cunning-devious mindset of the Zio mbrs of the TRIBE. It won’t happen again…

  3. A mad dog is more likely to rip you to bloody shreds if you don’t KILL it first – not just bite you!

    Was 911 just a little “nip” by that Zionist Israel “MAD DOG”?

    Is the GRAND DEPRESSION just more “nips” out of millions of Americans by that Zionist Israel “MAD DOG”?

    Are the Palestinians being “nipped” every day by that Zionist Israel “MAD GUARD DOG”?

    Were the Freedom Flotilla victims just “nipped” by that Zionist “MAD DOG”?

    Personally, I prefer to characterize Zionist Israel as “ZIORex” – a MAD RAPTOR, gone BERSERK!

    Don’t they MELT BERSERK RAPTORS? Ooooops – only YAHWEH does that! Thank God!


  4. a “mad dog” would normally be “put down” for the animal would be considered sick. I guess Israel never thought of that aspect.

  5. March 30, 2010

    The Israeli Mossad and 9/11: Conversations with/about Alan Sabrosky

    Kevin Barrett interviews Alan Sabrosky whose forceful and unequivocal statement that the Israeli Mossad did 9/11 sent shock waves through the 9/11 truth movement. Some have cheered his forthright honesty and heartfelt sincerity. Others are afraid of the PR blowback. A few have attacked Sabrosky, calling him a provocateur or even an anti-Semite, which seems odd since Sabrosky is part Jewish and obviously concerned for the welfare of Jewish Americans in the coming post-9/11-truth world.

Comments are closed.