Veterans aren’t lying about PTSD


As the U.S. Dept of Veterans Affairs (DVA) and Veterans Benefit Administration (VBA) made significant steps last year in improving the ludicrous regulations for veterans obtaining disability benefits for Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), it has become more clear that anti-veteran forces in the military, the American media, think-tanks and the DVA are still dedicated to preserving the culture of delay, deny and hope you die.

Agent Orange, PTSD, Gulf War Syndrome, Mesothelioma, Sexual assault, veterans gaming the system; the push-back has begun.

Nowhere is this anti-veteran culture more obvious than in the national Associated Press.

As the new House of Representatives takes aim at veterans benefits, we believe the 2010 column is even more relevant these next two years during the new legislative session. Now, the new anti-veteran message includes not just fraud, but debt, cost, efficiencies, personality disorder and privatization.

From the Wisconsin State Journal (Madison, Wisconsin)

The Wisconsin State Journal and many newspapers across the country ran an article by national Associated Press writer Allen Breed this month disparaging veterans’ disability benefits.

The benefits system is so veteran-friendly that Breed mocks it as “an open invitation to fraud.”

The AP article reads like a deliberate hit piece on America’s veterans and still provokes outrage.

Long overdue welcome-backs such as the LZ Lambeau event are great. But what our veterans really need is a U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs system that truly cares for them, not forcing veterans negotiating everyday life to jump through hoops until they give up and go away.

Breed quotes Mark Rogers, a longtime claims specialist with the Veterans Benefits Administration, who says: “I could get 100 percent disability compensation for post traumatic stress disorder for any (honorably discharged) veteran who’s willing to lie.”

Debatable at best, but can Rogers guarantee that he can get disability compensation for veterans who speak the truth?

No chance, say veterans’ advocates who compare the process of getting disability compensation to fighting an enemy you can’t engage, the infamous Veterans Affairs fog of “delay, deny, and hope you die.”

Says one angry Vietnam Army combat veteran, Bob Walsh, an attorney who battles the VA every day on behalf of veterans, “What about the claims of all the honest veterans that languish in the system for decades until they die.

“They freeze to death on the streets or blow their brains out in the garage. The veterans’ benefits claims system is a national tragedy, and men like Mark Rogers are the problem, not the solution for our veterans and their families.

“What a great attitude for an employee who is paid to serve disabled veterans.”

The Veteran Administration’s own office of Inspector General semiannual 2008-2009 report cites fewer than 100 benefits fraud cases per year, and you had better believe that they look hard.

The organization Veterans for Common Sense notes, there “is no widespread fraud problem at VA. Out of more than one million claims per year, less than a score are ever investigated for fraud.”

But there have been think tank-inspired attempts to seek out veterans claiming they have PTSD and to discredit them.

A Wisconsin Navy veteran referenced in Breed’s article was unjustly caught up in this dragnet.

Keith Roberts was charged and convicted of mail fraud, sentenced to five years in federal prison for accepting disability benefits from the VA for his diagnosed PTSD.

The VA’s policy continues to be that veterans have to prove there was a precipitating incident that led to their PTSD – as if trauma is not the natural outcome of exposing anyone to the miseries of war.

Under pressure from veterans groups, the VA is expected to publish more reasonable regulations in the near future.

In February, U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts questioned Assistant to the Solicitor General Anthony Yang in federal benefits-related case, Astrue v. Ratliff.

Marine in China Beach

Asked Justice Roberts, “In litigating with veterans, the government more often than not takes a position that is substantially unjustified?”

Yes, he was told.

Roberts found this “really startling.”

Mr. Chief Justice, you’re right.

What we do to our veterans is startling, and calling their benefits system an open invitation to fraud is outrageous.


We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully Informed
In fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.

About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT.
Previous articleCourts See an Increase in Veteran Offenders in Phoenix
Next articleBG Asif Haroon Raja: The US must solve Kashmir Issue