What is Odious Debt? How Do We Wipe it Out?

23
2267

People Power in Ecuador worked. Why not here in USA?

by Tom Valentine

 

The facts put forth in this Debt-O-cracy video can have earthquake type effects on the bleeping world banksters.

Most Americans wont take the time and effort to watch, and read the English subtitles, long enough to get the education that is here. (what’s new with that)? So I will try my best to explain it.

The concept of “Odious Debt is clearly explained, (at the 34-minute mark till the 40 minute mark on the tape.) It’s a phrase The global banksters fear so much, that when the Neocon Bush bunch used it to rid the conquering US of any liability for the billions of debts that Saddam Hussein allegedly owed to these crooks, our own government of puppets, crooks and whore media furiously covered up the truth as instructed. It’s all on this documentary video (at bottom of page) put out by International citizens who want to rid our world of the debt game, once and for all.

The video also shows what angry people can do when they get a united will to do so. Examples are documented in Argentina and especially Equador, which was not played up in the media so we did not know what really happened. “March on Rafael Correa

Watching this one hour, fourteen minute documentary was sheer pleasure for me. I cheered out loud when the angry green party politician called his EU peers hypocrites for selling billions of dollars worth of ships planes, and armaments to Greece for top dollar, to keep the factories running in Germany while destroying Greece.

Of course, the Greek politicians and privileged elites sold out their own people, and this is why a citizens commission route must be used. The video calls out Goldman Sachs for outrageous crimes, and we get to see documentation for how they operated internationally, criminally, in the name of US taxpayers.

We all have work to do. Cleaning up will be long and hard; but revolution of the kind they pulled in 1776 will only play into their hands. We need to be smarter about this.

An “audit of the Fed” is likely only part of a smokescreen. We can demand a select commission be named, publicly, that puts the International Finance Under a glaring spotlight, ,just as was done in Equador, and may soon happen in Greece because the people are that pissed off!

By openly forcing our government to publicly name such a commission—members we publicly name, which we can do with the Internet and some huge marches on Washington and at pro sports games , etc.

We, the people, must remain persistent. They will blackout the media at first, but there are more than enough pissed off Americans to pull this demonstration game off.

Egyptians did it, so did the Tunisians; however we need to discern which of these “Arab Spring” uprisings are genuine against the phony-debt bastards and which were spawned by our own myrmidon agencies, which are run by the IMFers (Immoral motherbleepers).

Watch the Spaniards, the Irish, The Portuguese, and Icelanders; I think they get it.

NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS ISSUES OPINION REGARDING TOMIKA GOODSON V. AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES

US Fed News Service, Including US State News July 10, 2009 RALEIGH, N.C., July 7 — The North Carolina Court of Appeals issued the following opinion:

TOMIKA GOODSON, Employee, Plaintiff, v. N.C. Industrial Commission I.C. No. 668784 AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES Employer, ACE USA/ESIS, Carrier, Defendants.

Appeal by Plaintiff from opinion and award entered 12 August 2008 by the North Carolina Industrial Commission. Heard in the Court of Appeals 12 March 2009.

Scudder & Hedrick, PLLC, by Samuel A. Scudder and April D. Seguin, for Plaintiff-Appellant. go to website affiliated computer services

Hedrick, Gardner, Kincheloe & Garofalo, L.L.P., by Vachelle Willis and Dana C. Moody, for Defendants-Appellees.

STEPHENS, Judge.

I. Procedural History and Factual Background Tomika Goodson (“Plaintiff”) filed a Form 18 on 20 March 2007 alleging her previously diagnosed post traumatic stress disorder (“PTSD”), depression, and panic attacks were aggravated by statements made about her prosthetic eye during a training class on 6 September 2006. Affiliated Computer Services, Inc. and Ace USA/ESIS (collectively “Defendants”) had previously filed a Form 61 on 30 November 2006 denying Plaintiff’s claim. Plaintiff filed a Form 33 requesting a hearing in this matter. Defendants responded by filing a Form 33R on 28 December 2006 maintaining their denial of the claim.

This matter was heard before Deputy Commissioner Theresa B. Stephenson on 17 May 2007. The evidence presented at the hearing tended to show the following:

In August 2000, prior to the incident at issue in this case, Plaintiff’s ex-boyfriend attacked her. Plaintiff was living in New Jersey at the time. Plaintiff’s ex-boyfriend punched Plaintiff in the eye, which resulted in the loss of her eye. Thereafter, Plaintiff received a prosthetic eye. Plaintiff’s ex-boyfriend was convicted and served jail time as a result of the attack. Plaintiff testified that after the attack and loss of her eye, she became very depressed and frustrated, and felt ugly and ashamed due to her eye injury. She also received psychiatric care, and was diagnosed with PTSD. Plaintiff met with a psychiatrist, was placed on medications, and was taken out of work. Plaintiff received social security disability benefits. see here affiliated computer services

In August 2005, Plaintiff’s ex-boyfriend was released from prison. Plaintiff saw her ex-boyfriend after his release, and decided to relocate for her safety and peace of mind. Through a grant from an organization called “Victims of Crime,” Plaintiff was able to relocate to Raleigh, North Carolina in October 2005. In March 2006, Plaintiff began working as a cashier for Food Lion. Plaintiff testified that her job with Food Lion “was scary at first because . . . [she] felt . . . someone was going to say something to [her] about [her] eye[.]” Plaintiff wore her hair pulled over her injured eye and always wore transitional glasses. Before getting a job at Food Lion, she always wore sunglasses in public.

ATTENTION READERS
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy