“For Saudi Arabia and Qatar, if they cannot have all of Iraq back, they are hell-bent on taking part of it for now.” … Zayd Alisa – Middle East Enterprise for Democracy Liberty and Counter Terrorism
by Zayd Alisa … for VT
Iraq, nearly a decade after the U.S. led invasion and one year after the end of the U.S. occupation is undeniably grappling with not merely an escalating sectarian crisis between the Shia-led partnership government and an increasingly disaffected Sunni minority, but also an intensifying ethnic crisis with an increasingly defiant and heavily armed Kurdish Region.
In 1991 Saudi Arabia fiercely resisted the toppling of Saddam’s regime and played a major role in pressurising the U.S. to turn its back on the popular uprising against Saddam’s tyrannical regime.
In 2003, however, Saudi Arabia’s immense influence in the U.S. was dramatically weakened due to the decisive role played by Saudi nationals in the 9-11 atrocities in the heart of the U.S.
Ever since the ousting of Saddam’s regime in 2003, the Saudi regime has adamantly refused to recognise the new democratic system in Iraq and has been steadfastly determined not to have any diplomatic representation in Baghdad.
Among the real underlying reasons behind the Saudi regime’s conspicuously emphatic hostility towards the fledgling democracy in Iraq, was and still is its deeply entrenched fear that the success of democracy in Iraq is an immensely harmful precedent, which would undoubtedly inspire its own people.
Another reason is the deeply rooted hatred towards the Shia, which explains its fierce refusal to come to terms with the inescapable reality that the Shia in Iraq constitute the indisputable majority. The Saudi regime also accuses, Nouri Al Maliki, the Iraqi Prime Minister, and the Shia-led Central Government (CG) of giving Iran a freehand to dramatically intensify its influence in Iraq.
Since the 2010 bitterly contested national elections, the heavily Sunni-dominated Iraqiya bloc -which enjoys the full blown support of both Saudi Arabia and Qatar- has persistently accused Al Maliki and the Shia-dominated National Alliance of high-jacking the elections, despite the patently unambiguous Federal Court’s ruling permitting the formation of the biggest bloc inside parliament.
The Saudi king left absolutely no doubt where his sympathies lie, underlining his unequivocal backing to the Iraqiya bloc by personally meeting its head, Ayad Allawi, immediately before and after the elections.
It is doubtless that the U.S. final withdrawal from Iraq in Dec 2011, which coincided with the arrest warrant issued against, Tariq Al Hashimi, Iraq’s Sunni Vice President, provided Saudi Arabia and Qatar with a golden opportunity to ramp up the message that Sunni discrimination would dramatically escalate.
Despite the enormous geo-political concessions made by the Iraqi government on its stance towards Syria and Bahrain – before the Arab League summit held in Baghdad, in April 2012 – to specifically appease the Saudi regime. It, nonetheless, decided to appoint its ambassador in Jordan as a non-resident ambassador to Iraq, reiterating the same old message that Iraq is far too insecure and unstable.
But, even more disparaging, was the Saudis and Qataris decision to restrict their representation to low level delegations.
And as part of Saudi and Qatari relentless efforts to ratchet up sectarian tensions in Iraq, the Qatari Prime Minister, Hamad Bin Jassim, not only asserted that Qatar’s low level participation was aimed at highlighting Qatar’s fierce objection to the marginalisation of Sunnis in Iraq, but to add insult to injury the Qatari PM and afterwards the Saudi Foreign Minister, Saud Al Faisal, offered Al Hashimi, a formal red-carpet reception in Doha and Riyadh, even while Al Hashimi –found guilty and handed down death sentence– was facing terrorism allegations.
The bombings keep coming
Both Saudi Arabia and Qatar have been working tirelessly to break up the Shia-Kurdish strategic alliance in Iraq, replacing it by a Turkish strategic alliance with the Kurdish Region (KR), headed by, Massoud Barzani, which has unquestionably, not only dramatically bolstered the position of the KR in its tense confrontation with the CG over land and oil, but also ramped up the ethnic tension.
Against this backdrop of growing sectarian tension, the arrest, in Dec 2012, of nine bodyguards of Iraq’s Sunni Finance Minister, Rafe Al Essawi and his accusations to the CG of marginalising the Sunni population, this sparked protests that swept the Sunni-dominated provinces of Anbar, Nainawa, Salah Al Deen and Deyala.
Although the protests started spontaneously, nonetheless, they were swiftly taken over by a number of the Iraqiya bloc leaders and hard-line Sunni clerics, who are closely connected to Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
And amid Iraqiya’s strenuous attempts to win over Muqtada Al Sadr’s unarguably vital endorsement, to ensure that the protests spreads far beyond the Sunni provinces, hence, it scrambled to replace the menacingly sectarian and Al Qaida’s slogans by patriotic ones.
It was, beyond doubt, Izzat Ibrahim’s –vice president during Saddam’s rule– ringing endorsement of the protests, which was followed by Al Qaida’s spokesman’s ominous call on the protesters to take up arms, that made it absolutely inconceivable for any Shia leader, let alone, Al Sadr to urge the Shia to join the protests.
The demonstrations that took place in Shia areas were by contrast highly supportive of Al Maliki’s government and have categorically refused any alterations to either the terrorism or the Justice and accountability laws.
The principal accusation of deliberately discriminating against the Sunni minority levelled at the CG, holds no water for the following reasons: Firstly, while the Sunni minority has persistently been in power since 1920, it was however, during the Baathist era –which started in 1968–and specifically under Saddam’s rule–which began in 1979–that the Sunnis were almost exclusively calling the shots in Iraq.
No wonder the Sunnis regard the prominent positions –Vice President, Deputy Prime Minister, Finance Minister and seven more ministries– given to them as woefully inadequate. Secondly, with the exception of the single clash, which occurred on 25th Jan 2013 –five weeks after the protests commenced– between the army and the protesters that caused the death of 8 protesters.
It is, nonetheless, incontestable that the army has consistently been extremely patient and extraordinarily lenient. While in comparison, the army was by far much harsher in dealing with protests in Shia areas like Basra, Al Nasriya and Al Diwaniyah.
Thirdly, in stark contrast to Sunni claims that Article 4 of the terrorism law has persistently been exploited to unfairly target them, in fact it was the Shia cities of Basra, Amarah, and Sadr city that experienced, in 2008, the harshest crack down and the strictest implementation of anti-terror laws.
Obama has kept the US out of Iraqi politics as a lose/lose situation
And finally, in an unprecedented move, the CG swiftly established three committees –headed by highly influential officials– to meet protesters demands. The CG is promptly meeting the protesters demands, including the release of thousands of prisoners and the return of thousands of those excluded to their jobs or receiving pensions.
The protesters, however, have not only insisted that none of their demands have been fulfilled, but dramatically ramped up their demands, calling for scraping the constitution and toppling Al Maliki’s CG.
This without doubt underlines that there are internal and external parties, spurring these protest not merely to persist but to dramatically escalate.
The internal parties include: Firstly, Iraqiya leaders, namely the speaker of the parliament, Usama Al Nujayfi, the Finance Minister, and the head of bloc in Parliament, Salman Al Jumaili, are desperately attempting to revive their popularity by portraying themselves as being targeted for standing up to the CG.
They are also using these protests to pile the pressure on Al Maliki to force him to resign, and, above all, hoping to regain lost ground to Al Maliki –particularly in the disputed areas with the KR– whose tough stance against the KR has undoubtedly bolstered his popularity with Sunni-Arabs. Secondly, these protests are certainly music to Brazani’s ears, who has been increasingly alarmed by Al Maliki’s growing popularity among the Sunni-Arabs in the disputed areas.
The external parties include: Firstly, Al Qaida which views the on-going protests as a golden opportunity for more radicalisation and ultimately an upsurge in recruitment. Just as important to Al Qaida, is exploiting the army’s reluctance to tackle terrorist suspects in the Sunni provinces –fearing the ready-made accusation of targeting Sunnis– to re-activate the safe-havens that originally existed in the Sunni provinces.
Secondly, for Saudi Arabia these protests are a dream come true: with Saudi Arabia’s popular uprising –which swept the Shia-dominated and oil-rich Eastern province– spreading to the Sunni heartland. The Saudi regime is increasingly using Iraq’s turmoil to convince its people that democracy eventually leads to instability, insecurity and ultimately civil war.
The Saudi regime is also seeking not merely to fend off any potential challenge by a democratic Iraq to its leadership of the Arab World, but also to ostracize Iraq by trumpeting these Sunni protests as irrefutable evidence from the horse’s mouth that Iraq is adopting a sectarian policy against the Sunnis.
Both Saudi Arabia and Qatar are exploiting the protests in Iraq as a highly effective tool to divert Iraq’s CG attention away from pursuing a diplomatic solution in Syria, as well as placating Iraq’s strident opposition to Saudi and Qatari concerted derive to, not just finance and arm the Syrian opposition –namely the extremist and hard-line Wahhabi Salafi, Jabhat Al Nusra, which is essentially Al Qaida’s branch in Syria– but also pay salaries to the insurgents.
In addition, the Saudis and Qataris are using the protests to keeps Iraq’s CG far too busy to prop up the Syrian regime. The Saudi regime is taking advantage of these protests and the sectarian strife it is deliberately stoking –in Iraq, Syria and Bahrain– to stave of dissent in its Sunni heartland by demonstrating that it is not just the guardian of Sunni Islam, but also at the forefront of combating an existential threat from the Shia, namely Iran.
The sectarian-ethnic conflicts, protests, Turkey’s open hostility and a revitalised Al Qaida are all an integral part of a modified last ditch attempt spearheaded by Saudi Arabia and Qatar to achieve their overarching goal of destabilising and ultimately dismantling the fledgling democracy in Iraq.
Yet, alarmingly, even if this ferocious all-out assault fails to restore minority rule, which is almost certainly the case –since the Shia are ready to fight tooth and nail to hold-on to power and indeed the CG have shown its unwavering determination on the 15th Feb 2013 to thwart all attempts to march on Baghdad– then Saudi Arabia and Qatar are implacably determined to throw their support behind the Sunnis drive to establish a Sunni Regional Government, which is similar to the KR but under Saudi and Qatari complete control.
For Saudi Arabia and Qatar, if they cannot have all of Iraq back, they are hell-bent on taking part of it for now.
Editing: Jim W. Dean