…by Jonas E. Alexis
“the NSA has a surveillance relationship with Israel that often entails cooperation as close as the Five Eyes partnership, if not sometimes even closer.
“A Memorandum of Understanding between the NSA and the Israeli intelligence service details how the United States takes the unusual step of routinely sharing with Israel raw intelligence containing the communications of American citizens.
“Among the data furnished to Israel are ‘unevaluated and unminimized transcrips, gists, facsimiles, telex, voice, and Digital Network Intelligence metadata and contant.’
“What makes this sharing particularly egregious is that the material is sent to Israel without having undergone the legally required process of ‘minimization.’”
Greenwald further points out that
“when it comes to disseminating data to Israeli intelligence, the NSA has apparently dispensed with…legalities altogether. The memo flatly states: ‘NSA routinely sends ISNU [the Israeli SGINT National Unit] minimized and unminimized raw collection.’
“Highlighting how a country can both cooperate on surveillance and be a target at the same time, and NSA document recounting the history of Israel’s cooperation noted ‘trust issues which revolve around previous ISR operations,’ and identified Israel as one of the most aggressive surveillance services acting against the United States…
“The same report observed that, despite the close relationship between American and Israeli intelligence agencies, the extensive information provided to Israel by the United States produced little in return. Israeli intelligence was only interested in collecting data that helped them. As the NSA complained, the partnership was geared ‘almost totally’ to Israel’s needs.”
In order to attack critics that they do not like, NSA officials lump them with terrorists and really wicked people. As Greenwald declares,
“It typically extends to meaningful dissent and any genuine challenge. It is the nature of authority to equate dissent with wrongdoing, or at least with a threat.”
Those dissents include non-violent protesters and people who opposed the Iraq war from the start. For example, one document “labeled ‘potential terrorist activity,’ lists events such as ‘Stop the war NOW!’ rally in Akron, Ohio.” It gets even more interesting:
“The NSA explicitly states that none of the targeted individuals is a member of a terrorist organization or involved in any terror plots. Instead, their crime is the views they express, which are deemed ‘radical,’ a term that warrants pervasive surveillance and destructive campaigns to ‘exploit vulnerabilities…’
“Much of the data collection conducted by the NSA has manifestly nothing to do with terrorism or national security.
“Intercepting the communications of the Brazilian oil giant Petrobras or spying on negotiation sessions at an economic summit or targeting the democratically elected leaders of allied states or collecting all Americans’ communications records has no relationship to terrorism.
“Given the actual surveillance the NSA does, stopping terror is clearly a pretext. Moreover, the argument that mass surveillance has prevented terror plots—a claim made by President Obama and a range of national security figures—has been proved false.”
Much of this information was made available to the Washington Post itself, and no one in his right mind can deny that Israel has performed covert operation against the U.S for decades. In fact, Newsweek has recently declared that
“Now U.S. intelligence officials are saying—albeit very quietly, behind closed doors on Capitol Hill—that our Israeli ‘friends’ have gone too far with their spying operations here.
“According to classified briefings on legislation that would lower visa restrictions on Israeli citizens, Jerusalem’s efforts to steal U.S. secrets under the cover of trade missions and joint defense technology contracts have ‘crossed red lines.’
“Israel’s espionage activities in America are unrivaled and unseemly, counterspies have told members of the House Judiciary and Foreign Affairs committees, going far beyond activities by other close allies, such as Germany, France, the U.K. and Japan.
“A congressional staffer familiar with a briefing last January called the testimony “very sobering…alarming…even terrifying.” Another staffer called it ‘damaging.’
“The Jewish state’s primary target: America’s industrial and technical secrets.
“‘No other country close to the United States continues to cross the line on espionage like the Israelis do,’ said a former congressional staffer who attended another classified briefing in late 2013, one of several in recent months given by officials from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), the State Department, the FBI and the National Counterintelligence Directorate.
“The intelligence agencies didn’t go into specifics, the former aide said, but cited ‘industrial espionage—folks coming over here on trade missions or with Israeli companies working in collaboration with American companies, [or] intelligence operatives being run directly by the government, which I assume meant out of the [Israeli] Embassy.’
“Israel and pro-Israel groups in America have long lobbied U.S. administrations to free Pollard, a former U.S. naval intelligence analyst serving a life sentence since 1987 for stealing tens of thousands of secrets for Israel. (U.S. counterintelligence officials suspect that Israel traded some of the Cold War-era information to Moscow in exchange for the emigration of Russian Jews.)
“After denying for over a decade that Pollard was its paid agent, Israel apologized and promised not to spy on U.S. soil again. Since then, more Israeli spies have been arrested and convicted by U.S. courts.
“I.C. Smith, a former top FBI counterintelligence specialist during the Pollard affair, tells Newsweek, ‘In the early 1980s, dealing with the Israelis was, for those assigned that area, extremely frustrating. The Israelis were supremely confident that they had the clout, especially on the Hill, to basically get [away] with just about anything.
“‘ This was the time of the Criteria Country List—later changed to the National Security Threat List—and I found it incredible that Taiwan and Vietnam, for instance, were on [it], when neither country had conducted activities that remotely approached the Pollard case, and neither had a history of, or a comparable capability to conduct, such activities.’
“Until recently, the major sticking point was the Jewish state’s discriminatory and sometimes harsh treatment of Arab-Americans and U.S. Palestinians seeking to enter Israel.
“It has also failed to meet other requirements for the program, such as promptly and regularly reporting lost and stolen passports, officials say—a problem all the more pressing since Iranians were found to have boarded the missing Malaysia Airlines flight with stolen passports.”
“The Israelis ‘thought they could just snap their fingers’ and get friends in Congress to legislate visa changes, a Hill aide said, instead of going through the required hoops with DHS.’”
Even the Jerusalem Post declared a few days ago that the State Department even “declined to refute reports that Israel regularly spies on the United States, and has for decades, after claims of expansive intelligence activity surface in the press last week.”
Yet according to Ari Lieberman of FrontPage magazine, the report by Newsweek was “sensational” and had little to do with truth.
Virtually every serious observer knows by now that Israel’s massive underground work against the U.S. has been going on for more than three decades. Former CIA official Philip Giraldi documents case after case where Mossad operations in the United States is well known among the intelligence community, but no one is willing to do something about it.
Both the San Francisco Chronicle and the Israeli newspaper Haaretz tells us:
“Despite inarguable ties between the U.S. and its closest ally in the Middle East and despite statements from U.S. politicians trumpeting the friendship, U.S. national security officials consider Israel to be, at times, a frustrating ally and a genuine counterintelligence threat…
“The CIA considers Israel its No. 1 counterintelligence threat in the agency’s Near East Division, the group that oversees spying across the Middle East, according to current and former officials”
Israel, according to some former CIA officials, is “to be the Mideast’s biggest spy threat.” For the past decade,
“Israel has been implicated in U.S. criminal espionage cases and disciplinary proceedings against CIA officers and blamed in the presumed death of an important spy in Syria for the CIA during the administration of President George W. Bush….
“Unlike Iran or Syria, for example, Israel as a steadfast U.S. ally enjoys access to the highest levels of the U.S. government in military and intelligence circles…
“This means the CIA believes that U.S. national secrets are safer from other Middle Eastern governments than from Israel.”
The report concludes,
“Israel is not America’s closest ally, at least when it comes to whom Washington trusts with the most sensitive national security information.”
If Israel is not America’s closest ally, wouldn’t it be stupid to provide Israel at least $3 billion every year?
I have also said that the Zionist kingdom is powerful but fragile. If Alexander Solzhenitsyn is right, that “One word of truth outweighs the world,” then the neo-Bolshevik ideology is in trouble, despite the fact that they are currently winning and holding the West captive.
They seem to be moving faster than the speed of light. With the help of technology, they are even infiltrating your TV, using it as a vehicle for spying information. We saw that Samsung stroke a deal with the CIA, and
“the CIA’s chief technology officer detailed the Agency’s vision for collecting and analyzing all of the information people put on the Internet. After laying out what the CIA does — i.e. collect intelligence, conduct analysis, perform covert action — CIA CTO Ira ‘Gus’ Hunt detailed just how the agency plans to acquire, store, and analyze digital data on a massive scale.”
The report continued,
“You’re already a walking sensor platform. You are aware of the fact that somebody can know where you are at all times because you carry a mobile device, even if that mobile device is turned off. You know this, I hope? Yes? Well, you should.”
One reporter wrote, “Since you can’t connect dots you don’t have, it drives us into a mode of, we fundamentally try to collect everything and hang on to it forever. It is really very nearly within our grasp to be able to compute on all human generated information.”
Now they are moving to the next stage of the spying game. CNN itself reported:
“The flaws in Samsung Smart TVs, which have now been patched, enabled hackers to remotely turn on the TVs’ built-in cameras without leaving any trace of it on the screen.
“While you’re watching TV, a hacker anywhere around the world could have been watching you. Hackers also could have easily rerouted an unsuspecting user to a malicious website to steal bank account information.”
Remember what Greenwald said, “Given the actual surveillance the NSA does, stopping terror is clearly a pretext.” He also declares that the spying system
“had clearly been implemented with virtually no accountability, no transparency, and no limit….
“The US government had built a system that has as its goal the complete elimination of electronic privacy worldwide. Far from hyperbole, that is the literal, explicitly stated aim of the surveillance state: to collect, store, monitor, and analyze all electronic communication by all people around the globe.
“The agency is devoted to one overarching mission: to prevent the slightest piece of electronic communication from evading its systemic grasp.”
If that is the case, what is the actual goal? If the Israelis are monitoring virtually the entire world through the NSA, what are they planning to do?
Furthermore, why is it that the same people who are monitoring the entire world do not want to be monitored? Greenwald again writes,
“Those Internet tycoons who are so willing to devalue our privacy are vehemently protective of their own. Google insisted on a policy of not talking to reporters from CNET, the technology news site, after CNET published Eric Schmidt’s personal details…in order to highlight the invasive dangers of his company
“Meanwhile, Mark Zuckerberg purchased the four homes adjacent to his own in Palo Alto, at a cost of $30 million, to ensure his privacy. As CNET put it, “Your personal life is now known as Facebook’s data. Its CEO’s personal ife is now known as mind your own business.
“The same contradiction is expressed by the many ordinary citizens who dismiss the value of privacy yet nonetheless have passwords on their email and social media accounts.
“They put locks on their bathroom doors; they seal the evelopes containing their letters. They engage in conduct when nobody is watching that they would never consider when acting in full view.
“the many pro-surveillance advocates I have debated since Snowden blew the whistle have been quick to echo Eric Schmidt’s view that privacy is for people who have something to hide. But none of them would willingly give me the passwords to their email accounts, or allow video cameras in their homes.
“When…Diane Feinstein insisted that the NSA’s collection of metadata does not constitute surveillance…online protesters demanded that she back up her assertion with action:
“Would the senator, each month, puboish a full list of people she emailed and called, including the length of time they spoke and their physical locations when the call was made?
“That she would take up the offer was inconceivable precisely because such information is profoundly revealing; making it public would constitute a true breach of one’s private realm.”
How, then is it possible that the oligarchs, the dreadful few, and NSA officials desire to monitor virtually the entire world but they themselves do not want to be monitored?
Furthermore, how is it possible that when people like Edward Snowden expose their evil deeds by monitoring them, all of a sudden their veins start pumping as if they were having a seizure or heart attack?
Well, to understand the magnitude of this issue, one must go beyond geopolitics and purely naturalistic phenomenon. One must look at patterns of revolutionary movements to see how the dreadful few have longed to turn the world upside down.
If this sounds a little far-fetched, let us call upon Baruch Levy, one of Karl Marx’s correspondents, and see what he said. He declared,
“the Jewish people taken collectively shall be its own Messias…In the new organization of humanity, the sons of Israel now scattered over the whole surface of the globe…shall everywhere become the ruling element without opposition….
“The governments of the nations forming the Universal or World-Republic shall all thus pass, without any effort, into Jewish hands thanks to the victory of the proletariat….
“Thus shall the promise of the Talmud be fuifilled, that, when the messianic epoch shall have arrived, the Jews will control the wealth of all the nations of the earth.”
In a speech delivered at the B’nai B’rith in 1902, Solomon Ehrmann, a Viennese Jew, envisioned a future in which “all of mankind will have been jewified and joined in union with the B’nai B’rith.”
When that happens, “not only the B’nai B’rith but all of Judaism will have fulfilled its task.” According to historian Albert S. Lindemann of the University of California, for Ehrmann, “Jewification equaled enlightenment.”
There you have it. The reason that the U.S. is able to spend at least $5 billion in Ukraine, the reason that the European Union can spend at least $15 billion in the same country to support covert activities, is pretty simple: Western morality and civilization must go down the tube and Talmudic ideology has to be substituted. As Jewish revolutionary Willi Munzenberg put it,
“We must organize the intellectuals and use them to make Western Civilization stink! Only then, after they have corrupted all its value and made life impossible, can we impose the dictatorship of the proletariat.”
Throughout the 1920s, Munzenberg sought to “make Western Civilization stink” by trying “to penetrate every conceivable milieu, get hold of artists and professors, make use of cinemas and theatres, and spread…the doctrine” of revolutionary activity. For Munzenberg, “social snobbery and high fashion” could be used for revolution.
“Munzenberg saw that the support of actors and actresses could make a political opinion fashionable, and it would then spread of its own accord…One front group would breed many more, in a pattern that Munzenberg referred to as ‘rabbit breeding.’”
Finally, flaming Jewish neoconservative and thought-police David Horowitz declared,
“For nearly two hundred years, Jews have played a disproportionate role as leaders of the modern revolutionary movements in Europe and the West.”
These covert and revolutionary movements have jumped from one era to the next with different names and political ideologies, but the metaphysical substratum remains the same: the overthrow of the moral and political order in all of its manifestations.
Once again, if you doubt this, take a look at how Bill Kristol views Israeli terrorist Yitzhak Shamir. Kristol did not even call him a terrorist but a simple “Zionist” who thought he was doing the right thing for the Jewish people! Kristol cannot escape the fact that this is what Leon Trotsky (the revolutionary father of neoconservativism) would have done.
There are other indications showing that Jewish revolutionary movements want to subvert the moral order, and a classic example would be the situation in Syria.
Can anyone with an ounce of common sense understand why 700 Britons want to go to Syria and support jihadist movements while much of the West stays silent? How is it that the U.S. is using millions upon millions of dollars to transport weapons to the jihadists in the same region while the average man in America is barely surviving and while at least 48,000 Afghan and Iraq veterans are at risk for homelessness?
Can Washington really explain to the American people why there are at least 400 U.S. mercenaries in Ukraine? Can anyone explain why Victoria Nuland was passing out cookies to protesters in Ukraine?
From a political and moral standpoint, the answers to those questions do not make sense whatsoever. Talmudic/Rabbinic ideology has taken a toll on economics and politics.
If you doubt the seriousness of this statement, ask Benjamin Netanyahu, who has recently declared that the Talmud will be the central core of Israel’s law. Hence, Netanyahu never can never pursue a peace deal with the Palestinians, since Talmudic and Rabbinic interpretations forbid its.
As Aluf Benn of the Guardian points out, Neantyahu “would rather stay in power than pursue a peace deal.” In fact, Shimon Peres himself has already made it clear that Netanyahu “torpedoed peace deal 3 years ago.” Israel, says former CIA officer Philip Giraldi, is very serious about spying on all of us but doesn’t care about peace in the Middle East.
Once Talmudic ideology takes over, the goyim will be suppressed both directly and indirectly; code speech will be the norm (which is to say that you will be labeled a wicked person is you challenge the powers that be); wars will roam the world (most particularly the Middle East and now in Ukraine) in the name of democracy.
Moreover, the blood of the goyim will be shared and splashed with unprecedented gusto.
If you doubt this, the Time of Israel has recently reported that “Israel barred Palestinian banks from making shekel deposits in Israeli banks and will run Palestinian electricity at half-strength for an hour each day. In addition, Israel is withholding $116 million of Palestinian tax revenue.
“The reduction in electricity will take effect on West Bank Palestinians daily between 1 p.m. and 1:30, and 7 p.m. and 7:30. The Israel Electric Company pointed to a $154 million debt owed by the Palestinian Jerusalem District Electric Company as the reason for the measure.
“With the restriction on shekel transfers, Palestinian banks now will be unable to exchange shekels for foreign currency, a right established in a 1994 Israeli-Palestinian economic agreement.”
Doesn’t that seem to be concentration camps? Imagine what would happen if America withholds millions of dollars of tax revenue that belong to an ethnic group.
And what’s some sickening is that the dreadful few think that you should accept their madness, otherwise you are an anti-Semite! The ADL has recently declared that “26 percent of the world’s adults are anti-Semitic.”
The West Bank and Gaza, according to the same thought-police organization, is 93 percent anti-Semitic and Iraq is 88 percent, and Libya 87! The ADL forgot to mention that those are the countries that Jewish revolutionary movements helped destroy. The same organization declared that 19 million Germans have anti-Semitic views.
I think the Germans should rise up and demand an explanation when Menachem Begin declared,
“There is not one German who has not murdered our fathers. Every German is a Nazi. Every German is a murderer.”
If the Germans are labeled anti-Semitic for asking what Begin actually meant here, I think they should take it as a compliment.
We must also keep in mind that Talmudic ideology seems to have no boundary: if blatant lies have to be invented in order to destroy one country after another—as we saw in Iraq, Libya, and more recently in Syria—then so be it.
But in this war, serious and important distinctions must be made. As Russian-Israeli writer Israel Shamir rightly pointed out,
“One should make a clear distinction between Jews as persons, and the Jewish paradigm as ideology. Jews are just human, and deserve to be treated and accepted as human. The Jewish paradigm should be confronted and counteracted.
“Two important issues were confused: the question of external relations, human and civil rights, human dignity on one side and ideological difference and variance, on the other. They can and should be treated separately.”
The Church has articulated something very similar from time immemorial. Sicut Judaeis non made it clear that Jews are not subjected to violence and hatred, but they should not enjoy no rights other than those permitted by law and the moral order.
If both statements are ignored or suppressed, trouble will be the end result. The document was written in about 1120. It reads in part:
“We decree that no Christian shall use violence to force them to be baptized as long as they are unwilling and refuse, but that if anyone of them seeks refuge among the Christians of his own free will and by reason of his faith, after his willingness has become quite clear shall he be made a Christian without subjecting himself to any calumny.
“For surely none can be believed to possess the true faith of a Christian who is known to have come to Christian baptism not willingly, and even against his wishes.
“Moreover, without the judgment of the authority of the land, no Christian shall presume to wound their persons, or kill [them] or rob them of their money, or change the good customs which they have thus far enjoyed in the place where they live.
“Furthermore, while they celebrate their festivals, no one shall disturb them in any way by means of sticks and stones, nor exact from any of them forced service, except that which they have been accustomed to perform from ancient times.
“In opposition to the wickedness and avarice of evil men in these matters, we decree that no one shall presume to desecrate or reduce the cemetery of the Jews, or, with the object of extorting money, to exhume bodies there buried.
“If anyone, however, after being acquainted with the contents of this decree, should presume to act in defiance of it (which God forbid), he shall suffer lost of honour and office, or he shall be restrained by the penalty of excommunication, unless he shall have made proper amends for his presumption.”
In the twenty-first century, Sicut Judaeis non is ignored and suppressed. What do we get in return? The war in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, and now Ukraine.
If the trends continue, probably Iran will be next. Victoria Nuland will probably hand out goodies to Iranian protesters. Let us hope that this is just pure imagination.
 See for example Andrea Peterson, “The NSA Is Sharing Data with Israel. Before Filtering out Americans’ Information,” Washington Post, September 11, 2013; Glenn Greenwald, Laura Poitras, and Ewen MacAskill, “NSA Shares Raw Intelligence Including Americans’ Data with Israel,” Guardian, September 11, 2013.
 Jeff Stein, “Israel Won’t Stop Spying on the U.S.,” Newsweek, May 6, 2014.
 Michael Wilner, “US State Department Does Not Deny Reports of ‘Unrivaled’ Israeli Spies,” Jerusalem Post, May 13, 2014.
 Ari Lieberman, “Zionist Spies in the U.S.?,” FrontPage Magazine, May 13, 2014.
 See for example Grant F. Smith, Divert!: Numec, Zalman Shapiro and the Diversion of Us Weapons Grade Uranium Into the Israeli Nuclear Weapons Program (WA: Institute for Research, 2007).
 Philip Giraldi, “Mossad in America,” American Conservative, August 23, 2010.
 “Former U.S. Officials Say CIA Considers Israel to Be Mideast’s Biggest Spy Threat,” Haaretz, July 28, 2012; Adam Goldman, “US Sees Israel, Tight Mideast Ally, as Spy Threat,” San Francisco Chronicle, July 28, 2012.
 Ibid; emphasis added.
 Michael Kelley, “CIA Chief Tech Officer: Big Data Is The Future And We Own It,” Business Insider, March 21, 2013.
 Jennifer Valentino-Devries, “FBI Taps Hacker Tactics to Spy on Suspects,” Wall Street Journal, August 1, 2013.
 Michael Kelley, “CIA Chief Tech Officer: Big Data Is The Future And We Own It,” Business Insider, March 21, 2013.
 Erica Fink and laurie Segall, “Your TV Might Be Watching You,” CNN, August 1, 2013.
 Quoted in E. Michael Jones, Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2008), 1066.
 Albert S. Lindemann, Esau’s Tears: Modern Anti-Semitism and the Rise of the Jews (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), 331.
 Daniel N. White, “Ukraine: Follow the Money,” Counterpunch.org, March 19, 2014; Ria Novosti, “Nuland Says US Spent $5 Billion to Back Democracy in Ukraine,” Kyiv Post, April 22, 2014.
 Alanna Petroff, “EU Offers $15 Billion in Aid to Ukraine,” CNN, March 5, 2014.
 Quoted in Fred Siegel, The Revolt Against the Masses (New York: Encounter Books, 2013), 87.
 Quoted in Jones, Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, 953.
 Tom Whitehead, “Up to 700 Britons Feared to Be in Syria,” Telegraph, April 24, 2014.
 TM Gibbons, “U.S. Weapons in Syrian Rebel Hands,” Daily Beast, April 24, 2014; Ian Black, “US and Britain to Boost Support to Syrian Rebels, Says Kerry,” Guardian, May 15, 2014.
 David Leonhardt and Kevin Quealy, “The American Middle Class Is No Longer the World’s Richest,” NY Times, April 22, 2014.
 Gregg Zoroya, “Up to 48,000 Afghan, Iraq Vets at Risk for Homelessness,” USA Today, January 17, 2014.
 Aluf Benn, “Binyamin Netanyahu Would Rather Stay in Power than Pursue a Peace Deal,” Guardian, April 30, 2014.
 “Israel Restricts Palestinian Banking, Electricity,” Times of Israel, May 17, 2014.
 Rick Gladstone, “26 Percent of the World’s Adults Are Anti-Semitic, Survey Finds,” NY Times, May 13, 2014.
 Quoted in Tom Segev, The Seventh Million: The Israelis and the Holocaust (New York: Henry Hold, 2000), 216.
 Harriet Sherwood, “Israeli Intelligence ‘Intercepted Syrian Regime Talk About Chemical Attack,’” Guardian, August 23, 2013.
 Shamir, Cabbala of Power, 317.
 Quoted in James Parkes, The Jew in the Medieval Community (New York: Sepher-Hermon Press, 1976), 212.