…by Jonas E. Alexis
Let us do some thought experiment here. Suppose a famous politician or journalist or talk show host walks into a very popular academic conference or historical meeting and dialogue and starts saying some uncomfortable but true things about Nazi Germany. Suppose he or she does not even like Adolf Hitler or the Third Reich but wants to look at Germany in the 1920s from a logically historical and rationally defensible point of view.
Suppose the same person wants to start from the metaphysics of history and moves on to lay out incontrovertible and stunning facts about places like Berlin and indeed the Weimar Republic. The same individual has read historian Jon Wiener’s Historians in Trouble: Plagiarism, Fraud, and Politics in the Ivory Tower and realized that “conformist historians” (to use David Irving’s words) lie all the time to save their career or to keep an ideology moving.
Suppose that person read what Lucian (c. AD 125 – after AD 180) said about true history and begins to take the historical method seriously and apply it to Germany in the 1920s. After much investigation and soul-searching, suppose he or she starts saying something like this:
“From a historical perspective, Germany’s survival was certainly at stake during the 1920s and 30s. In fact, if one reads even Paul Johnson’s Modern Times or David Clay Large’s Berlin or Mel Gordon’s Voluptuous Panic: The Erotic World of Weimar Berlin or Maria Tatar’s Lustmord: Sexual Murder in Weimar Germany or Edward J. Bristow’s Prostitution or Prejudice or any fair and honest historical study of that period, he would invariably conclude that Germany, most specifically Berlin, was the sex capital in Europe. And those who were promoting sexual revolution during that period had a clear agenda. Hitler maybe a bad guy, but he did clean much of the city when he took over Germany.
“Some would say that Hitler did try to rescue Germany from economic collapse and cultural oblivion. One needn’t be a Hitlerite or an advocate of the Third Reich to look at what happened in the past and draw cogently rational conclusions. Isn’t that part of the Western intellectual patrimony?”
What do you think would happen to that person? Well, I can assure you that the New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, Fox News, the Wall Street Journal, and other Zionist outlets would have a unified headline virtually everywhere: anti-Semitism, anti-Semitism, anti-Semitism.
Remember what happened to a man named Fred Leuchter? You remember how he made the mistake of saying that there were vital inconsistencies within the Holocaust narrative with respect to gas chambers?
Well, the Mossad and NWO agents eventually put a price on Leuchter’s head. Listen to his recent testimony, which my intrepid friend and fighter Dr. Fredrick Toben has recently sent me:
The sad thing is that when members of the Dreadful Few pompously and hubristically glorify Stalin in popular books or in the media, they get great accolades! What is equally worse is that they sell their propaganda to the masses and are laughing all the way to the bank. Listen very carefully to Jewish Neocon Mark Levin in his book Liberty and Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto:
“America has, will, and must make alliances with nondemocratic regimes and even former enemies if, under the right circumstances, doing so preserves and improves American society.
“During World War II, the United States allied with the Soviet Union in order to defeat the Axis powers, including Nazi Germany. The Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin was a genocidal, imperialistic regime. But America’s survival was at stake. And, in fact, the alliance did preserve the nation.”
Thanks, Mark. You have made our job really easy. So, the so-called war on terror is not and has never been about war on terror at all—it is about the Dreadful Few getting their greedy and bloody hands on foreign policy and using it to bludgeon the Middle East to death.
Moreover, Levin just told us that he is willing to move heaven and earth and sign pacts with just about any mass murderer in history in order to bring about his essentially subversive ideology, which we all know is metaphysically Talmudic. Who cares about the millions upon millions of poor peasants who were sent to slaughter houses under Stalin’s watch? They were simply subjects. “America” was much more important than those “swine,” “dogs,” “cockroaches,” “scum,” “vermin,” “filth,” and even “garbage,” to use Stalin’s own words. When it comes to saving members of the Dreadful Few, peasants during the “Great Purge” are just secondary.
If the “Stalinist dictatorship subjected at least 60 million people to some sort of ‘hard’ or ‘soft’ repression and discrimination,” as historian Oleg V. Khlevniuk puts it, then that would be all right for Levin because those people are not members of the tribe. Levin’s overarching concern here is the survival of Zionist America and nothing else. For those who do not know, get this.
Within one year alone, 1932-1933, Stalin has already liquated 5 to 7 million people. Khlevniuk says that
“At its peak in late 1932 and early 1933, the famine afflicted an area populated by more than 70 million people: Ukraine, the North Caucasus, Kazakhstan, and some Russian provinces….While the entire country suffered from famine and mass repression, Ukraine and North Caucasus were the most affected. It was in these two important regions of the USSR where the policy of punishing grain requisitions and terror were most brutally applied.”
That again is no big deal for Levin because those poor Russian peasants were almost exclusively Christians. After all, the Neocons are indirectly doing almost the same thing in the Middle East; they liquidating Christians and other innocent people through the “Israeli Secret Intelligence Service” known to the masses as ISIS or ISIL.
Ironically, it turned out that it was Assad who was protecting the Christian population from groups like ISIS.
Levin certainly needs to explain the following facts to us and tell us forthrightly how he still can praise a man like Stalin:
“Stalin was physically destroying church buildings, as Lenin had willed. The famous seventeenth century church of St. Paraskevi on Okhotny Ryad was destroyed. Curious crowds stared wild-eyed as the great bell, nine tons in weight, was hurled to the ground.
“Five thousand people joined enthusiastically in demolishing the Monastery of St. Simon. But the high point of the campaign was the collective destruction by a crowd many thousands strong of the Church of Christ the Savior, the largest place of worship in Moscow.
“As a symbol, Stalin decided to erect on the site of this Christian temple the greatest temple of the new regime—the Palace of the Soviets, to be crowned with a gigantic statue of the God Lenin.
“Such churches as survived were converted into storehouses. Children were told at school to bring icons for a public bonfire, and were given posters of Lenin to hang in their place. Newspapers published letters to the editor announcing that some former priest had broken with religion forever. The slogan ‘religion is the opium of the people’ was displayed everywhere and anywhere.”
Did those facts even remotely show up in Mark Levin’s so-called Conservative Manifesto? The answer is a resounding no. Why? Again, St. Athanasius provided the answer a long time ago:
“being against Logos is synonymous with being Satanic.”
The Neoconservative ideology, which does not allow Levin to clear his head when it comes to politics, is metaphysically Satanic because it violates the moral law and implicitly or indirectly attacks logos. In that sense, Levin is a Satanist in disguise.
 See for example Maria Tatar, Lustmord: Sexual Murder in Weimar Germany (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1995); for another fair representation, see Albert S. Lindemann, Esau’s Tears: Anti-Semitism and the Rise of the Jews (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).
 He said: “If you are going to write history you must sacrifice to truth alone, ignoring everything else…Well, my historian should be like that: fearless, incorruptible, frank, a friend of free speech and the truth, determined, as the comic poet puts it, to call figs figs and a tub a tub, indulging neither hatred nor friendship, sparing nobody, not showing pity or shame or diffidence, an unbiased judge, kindly to everyone up to the point of not allowing one side more than it deserves, a stranger without a stake in his writings, independent, serving no king, not taking into account what any man will think, but simply saying what happened…On the whole, I ask you to remember this—and I shall keep on repeating it: don’t only write with an eye to the present, hoping that the present generation will praise and honour you. You should aim at eternity, writing for posterity and claiming payment for your book from them; so that it can be said of you: ‘He was a free man, totally frank in his speech, untouched by flattery or servility, showing truthfulness in everything.’” Lucian, Selected Dialogues (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), 96, 197, 201.
 Mark R. Levin, Liberty and Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto (New York: Threshold, 2009), 196.
 Quoted in Norman Naimark, Stalin’s Genocide (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010), 59.
 Oleg V. Khlevniuk and Nora Seligman Favorov, Stalin: New Biography of a Dictator (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2015), 38.
 Ibid; see also Steven Rosefielde, Red Holocaust (New York: Routledge, 2010).
 Khlevniuk and Favorov, Stalin, 119.
 Shelby Lin Erdman, Mohammed Tawfeeq and Hamdi Alkhshali, “Islamic extremists kill 270 in attack on a gas field in central Syria, report says,” CNN, July 19, 2014; “ISIS recruiting children to kill Christians, Shiite Muslims,” Christianity Today, August 12, 2014; David D. Kirkpatrick, “ISIS Video Appears to Show Executions of Ethiopian Christians in Libya,” NY Times, April 19, 2015.
 “Obama: Assad Protected Christians In Syria,” MintPress News, September 12, 2014; “Rand Paul: Assad ‘Protected Christians’ in Syria, Rebels ‘Attacking Christians,’” Huffington Post, September 3, 2013.
 Edvard Radzinsky, Stalin: The First In-Depth Biography Based on Explosive New Documents from Russia’s Secret Archives (New York: Anchor Books, 1996), 242.
 Cited in E. Michael Jones, “The Great Satan and Me: Reflections on Iran and Postmodernism’s Faustian Pact,” Culture Wars, July/August 2015.
Jonas E. Alexis has degrees in mathematics and philosophy. He studied education at the graduate level. His main interests include U.S. foreign policy, the history of the Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the new book Zionism vs. the West: How Talmudic Ideology is Undermining Western Culture. He teaches mathematics in South Korea.