HR 1627 – Would Tighten VA Rules for Service Dogs

5
819

 

tn_01About 3 years ago, I posted several articles written by Dr. Joan Esnayra, President and Founder of the Psychiatric Service Dog Society. At the time these articles were written (2009), Dr. Esnayra was a consultant for the U.S. Armybplane2_150 then looking for innovative ways of assisting troops and Veterans with PTSD using among other innovations-expanded access to Dogs.

What I came away with, both back then and now is a debate and effort on the part of established (or is that establishment) Physical Service Dog organizations fearing an influx (competition) of poorly trained dogs destined for people with cognitive or mental disorders such a PTSD.

That’s one way of looking at it another of course is that the establishment Service Dog organizations (meaning Guide Dogs for the Blind and related physical disabilities) did not want competition from the Psych Dog community.

psd_400One need only do a Google search of “Dogs for Vets or Dogs for Veterans,” to note the growth of a potential competitor to the traditional physical disability community of Dog Trainers and Suppliers.

Let’s be the Devil’s Advocate for a moment and agree that Rules for Assistance and Service Dogs should remain in the realm of organizations that have traditionally focused on physical disabilities such as blindness.

Question remains as regards Veterans (or even youngsters with autism and related cognitive disorders), does the establishment Service Dog community seriously intend expanding their focus into Mental Health related disabilities? Can the established traditional Service Dog organizations provide enough professionally trained dogs to meet the needs of America’s Veterans, and if they can at what costs?

That said, when one considers that the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) may intent siding with the establishment Service Dog industry to restrict access to the VA to solely dogs trained by those organizations whose focus had been (and remains) physical handicaps – the result can only be that the VA will never recognize disability compensation or benefits to cover training and access such dogs.

img_0043_400Anyway Dr. Esnayra has asked the Veterans Activist Community to not support HR 1627 – Honoring America’s Veterans and Caring for Camp Lejeune Families Act of 2012 because of language that would allow the VA to restrict the definition of what a Service Dog is and as a result limiting the number of Veterans with Service Dogs from entering VA facilities unless such animals have the blessing of establishment Physical Service Dog organizations.

In her words, “HR1627 was finally signed-off by Congress.  Now, this proverbial ‘Trojan Horse’ bill is sitting on Obama’s desk waiting for his NAIVE signature.”

To the nontraditional Service Dog community that tends to focus beyond physical to cognitive and mental handicaps of Veterans caused by never ending wartime deployments and exposure to trauma, Dr. Esnayra says:

 

 

“Right now is truly your LAST chance to prevent the wholesale exclusion of owner-trained service dogs from VA property forever into the future.   (Exclusion of our dogs has already been achieved within the Army by virtue of its ADI-only service dog policy).”
Note: as mentioned earlier Dr. Esnayra’s approach to Assistance Dogs for our troops was in favor with the U.S. Army when the Army wanted to give the impression it was serious about dealing with PTSD and seeking innovative ways to do so.

 

She concludes her call to action by saying, “Hopefully now you are better able to perceive the careful noose that ADI is setting up for us.  I have been rattling cages and ringing bells about this impending doom for a long time, think Paul Revere–“the British are Coming!”.  Many small-minded persons have made fun of me for this.  Now it is happening for real.  What are YOU going to do about it?

 

 

Flood the White House with calls and emails.  Tell Obama to VETO this bill. Follow this link to Contact the White House and tell President Obama to VETO this bill.

 

 

Our rights will be LOST if you do nothing.  After establishing these strategic legal precedents, toppling the ADA regulations on owner-trained Service Dogs will be a mere cake walk for the ADI cartel.  If Obama signs off on HR1627, then, I give the cartel exactly three years to successfully pass an ADI certification requirement nationwide.  Then owner-training will be gone forever.

 

I can no longer fight this battle on my own, folks.  I have held this ADI monster at bay on behalf of this community for years, and I have paid dearly on so many levels for having done so.  It is time for the rest of you to step up to the plate.
It is NOW or never.

 

Joan

Posted by: Robert L. Hanafin, SP5, U.S. Army (69-77), Major, U.S. Air Force-Retired (77-94), Veterans Issues and Peace Activism Editor, Veterans Today News Network. 

These links to the several articles I posted for Dr. Esnayra back in 2009 serves as background on the debate between the Physical Disability Assistance Dog community and the Cognitive Disability Assistance Dog Community.

As a side note, I personally have a problem with calling of labeling an Assistance or Service Dog as a Psychiatric Service Dog due to the never ending STIGMA associated with having such illnesses. Simply put, I personally would not set myself up for confrontation in a public place by having my dog advertise my handicap. However, the point remains that such animals are beneficial to Veterans with cognitive disabilities and PTSD regardless.

Current Related Articles and Opinions on the restrictive nature of HR 1627.

Army Times – Congress may tighten VA rules for service dogs

Some of the new Service Dog Rules Explained from the Website of USMCrazy-the After Effects of Going to Combat

H.R.1627 – Janey Ensminger Act

SPECIAL SERIES: Training Your Own PTSD Service Dog by Dr. Joan Esnayra

Stigma: We Shall Overcome! by Dr. Joan Esnayra.

 

ACTION ALERT – Contact DOT to Stop Potential Discrimination Against Disabled Vets

vetsdog

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

ATTENTION READERS
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy