The New York Times today is running a story concerning the substance of the U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan’s cables to the White House last November. They are stark reminders of the divisions within our government relative to our Af-Pak policies. I am not the only one who opposses General McChrystal’s myopic view of the situation.
The piece is entitled U.S. Envoy’s Cables Show Concerns on Afghan War Plans and is best read without any further comments from me in order for its full impact to be felt by our readers.
ATTENTION READERS
We See The World From All Sides and Want YOU To Be Fully InformedIn fact, intentional disinformation is a disgraceful scourge in media today. So to assuage any possible errant incorrect information posted herein, we strongly encourage you to seek corroboration from other non-VT sources before forming an educated opinion.
About VT - Policies & Disclosures - Comment Policy
Due to the nature of uncensored content posted by VT's fully independent international writers, VT cannot guarantee absolute validity. All content is owned by the author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images are the full responsibility of the article author and NOT VT.
