Confessions Of A "Modern Anti-Semite"

7
717

The modern anti-semite:  The so-called Israel critic

 

“The ‘Israel critic’ will never state ‘Jews go home’ but is questioning the legality of the incorporation of the State of Israel and therefore the right for the Jewish people to settle in their homeland. He will not say the Jews are the evil of the world but claim that the State of Israel is a major cause for instability and war in the region.

There is no other country, no other people on this planet the ‘Israel critic’ would dedicate so much time and devotion as to the case of Israel. For no other country he would criticize or ask to boycott its goods or academics. And this for one simple reason: Because Israel is the state of the Jewish people, not more and not less.” -Zionist apologist Nathan Gelbart, quoted by Zionist Y-Net News

Right you are, Nathan. We anti-Zionists don’t like Israel for only one reason: We’re anti-Jewish bigots.

If it had been Presbyterians who crossed the seas to invade and occupy Palestine, we would be saying: “Hooray for the Presbyterian State! Go, Presbytarians! Kill more Arabs!”

If Irish-Americans, proud of their Celtic heritage, organized to invade and occupy Palestine because it is the home of the ancient Celtic (i.e. Phonecian) peoples, we would all scream “Three cheers for the Celtic state! Exterminate those brown-skinned natives who have no business being there!”

If American Bible-belt Christians organized to invade and occupy the Holy Land of their Lord and Savior, and established a Redneck Christian State there, we would all cheer “Right on, Rednecks! Long live the Conservative Christian Holy Land State! (And thank God they’re leaving North America!)”

Yes, we anti-Zionists, who are of course anti-Semites in disguise, strongly support EVERY ethnic and/or religious group that wants to travel thousands of miles to genocidally invade and occupy someplace that their ancient mythology tells them is their “original homeland.” But for some reason we don’t want to let the Jews do it. Why not? Because we hate Jews, of course.





We would be ecstatic if Native American groups throughout North and South America banded together to invade and occupy China, expel the Chinese people, and declare it their long-lost Red Chinese Homeland. After all, Asia is the original home of the Red Man – the Chinese are just interlopers.

And since the word “Indian” suggests they came from India, let’s give them that, too. What to do with the two billion Chinese and Indian ethnic cleansing victims? Do what the Israelis did – put them in open air concentration camps. At a population density comparable to Gaza, all two billion Chinese and Indians could easily fit into Sri Lanka.

And we support white pride groups who want to invade and occupy Africa and expel the black people. After all, white people originally came from Africa. The black people don’t really belong there.

We’d love to see the Gypsies to invade and occupy Egypt, ethnically cleanse the Egyptian population, and set up a Gypsy state. And we hope their cousins the Bohemians will do the same thing to Bohemia.

In short, we support the rights of everybody EXCEPT the Zionist Jews to do exactly what the Zionist Jews have done in Palestine: Go halfway around the world, commit genocide, and justify it by citing myths about an “ancient homeland.”

Unfortunately, it seems that nobody EXCEPT the Zionist Jews wants to do this…or has the raw power to accomplish it.

And of course we can’t support THEM.

Because they’re Jewish.

And we’re bigots.

That’s it.

That’s the only reason.

Or so people like Nathan Gelbart would have you believe.

When Profits Drop at Ford Motor Co., So Do Executives’ Rewards.(Originated from Detroit Free Press)

Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News April 10, 1996 | Brennan, Mike Apr. 10–Despite a healthy profit of $4.1 billion last year, Ford’s board of directors cut Ford Chairman Alex Trotman’s bonus in half and froze his salary in 1995. here ford stock price today

Trotman wasn’t the only top Ford executive to take a financial hit because of lower corporate earnings, according to the automaker’s 1995 proxy statement to shareholders, released Tuesday.

Executive Vice President W. Wayne Booker, Ford Automotive President Edward Hagenlocker, Vice Chairman Louis Ross and Ford Financial Services Group President Kenneth Whipple also received little or no raises and smaller bonuses.

“We pay for performance,” said Ford spokesman Chris Vinyard. “And 1994 was a record year for Ford. While 1995 was the fourth-best year ever, compensation is tied to performance both long-term and annually.” In 1995, Ford earned $4.1 billion, down 23 percent from the record $5.3 billion in 1994.

Trotman also was awarded 350,000 stock options worth about $1.1 million as of Tuesday’s closing stock price.

Stock options are a form of executive compensation tied to stock prices. Executives can buy stock at prices typically below prevailing market values and pocket the difference.

In the United States, Ford’s automotive operations earned $1.8 billion, declining $1.2 billion compared with 1994. A solid first half of 1995 was followed by a disappointing second half, due in large part to the cost of retooling more factories than usual to build redesigned models such as the Ford Taurus midsize sedan and the F150 pickup.

The board also weighed product quality and customer satisfaction in deciding how much to pay its top executives, Vinyard said, but neither counted as much as the lower financial results.

Even so, Trotman earned $5,431,354 last year, about $2.5 million less than in 1994. Much of the change came from a cut in his bonus from $6 million in 1994 to $3 million. here ford stock price today

Ford’s chairman actually pocketed about $3.1 million last year, and had the remaining $2.3 million deferred to future years. How much he earns in deferred income is tied to the long-term performance of Ford and the future of Ford’s stock price.

It’s another incentive for Trotman to pull the right strings so that Ford stock price and profit levels increase.

It’s also the same carrot Ford’s board gave to the other top executives and to the board itself. Each director has agreed to maintain ownership in stock equal to five times the sum of the outside director’s annual board and committee fees, roughly $60,000 a year.

Ford last year adopted guidelines for people at the vice-presidential level and above that establish target ranges from one times salary to five times for Trotman.

Trotman has extended the one-time earnings target to 30 other key executives below the vice-presidential level, tying the bulk of Ford’s senior executives compensation to company performance.

The board also decided that as of last January, $10,000 of each director’s annual fee will be paid in stock, not cash.

Both Chrysler Corp. and General Motors Corp. have made similar moves to either fully or partially compensate board members with stock instead of cash.

Story Filed By The FREE PRESS, DETROIT, MI —– FOR ONLINE SERVICES:

Visit the Detroit Free Press Forum on CompuServe. Go DETFORUM.

—– C, GM, F, Brennan, Mike

Author Details
Read Dr. Barrett’s Latest Posts Here >>>

Dr. Kevin Barrett, a Ph.D. Arabist-Islamologist, is one of America’s best-known critics of the War on Terror.

He is host of TRUTH JIHAD RADIO; a hard driving weekly radio show funded by listener donations at Patreon.com and FALSE FLAG WEEKLY NEWS (FFWN); a audio-video show produced by Tony Hall, Allan Reese, and Kevin himself. FFWN is funded through FundRazr.

He also has appeared many times on Fox, CNN, PBS and other broadcast outlets, and has inspired feature stories and op-eds in the New York Times, the Christian Science Monitor, the Chicago Tribune, and other leading publications.

Dr. Barrett has taught at colleges and universities in San Francisco, Paris, and Wisconsin; where he ran for Congress in 2008. He currently works as a nonprofit organizer, author, and talk radio host.
ATTENTION READERS
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

Comments are closed.