DISCLOSURE: VT condemns the horrific tragedy committed by the NAZI Party against Jewish Citizens of Europe during Word War II known as the "Holocaust". VT condemns all racism, bigotry, hate speech, and violence. However, we are an open source uncensored journal and support the right of independent writers and commentors to express their voices; even if those voices are not mainstream as long as they do NOT openly call for violence. Please report any violations of comment policy to us immediately. Strong reader discretion is advised.
“I don’t believe in Western morality. Living by Torah [the Talmud, of course] values will make us a light unto the nations who suffer defeat because of a disastrous morality of human invention.”—Rabbi Ovadia Yosef
…by Jonas E. Alexis
(We will pick up our examination of Christian Zionism after the next article.)
In 1924, just four years after Winston Churchill wrote his controversial article “Zionism vs. Bolshevism: The Struggle for the Soul of the Jewish People,” Jewish novelist, intellectual, and lecturer in history Maurice Samuel wrote in his book You Gentiles,
“We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain the destroyers forever. Nothing that you [Gentiles] will do will meet our needs and demands. We will forever destroy because we need a world of our own, a God-world, which is not in your nature to build.”
Previously, Maurice wrote that “Jew and gentile are two worlds, that between you gentiles and us Jews there lies an unbridgeable gulf.”
Maurice is right and wrong at the same time but not in the same respect. Yes, there is a gulf between being “Jewish” and “Gentile.” Maurice sees this “unbridgeable gulf” as racial, but it is primarily theological. This theological gulf indeed has political and ideological consequences.
Theologically, being Jewish means being anti-Christ, anti-order, and anti-reason. In other words, being Jewish means subverting the moral order and replacing it with Jewish messianic movements which always promise heaven on earth but delivers chaos instead. This is why Paul declares in the New Testament that “the Jews,” in essence, “are contrary to all men” (1 Thessalonians 2:15).
Does that mean that my dear brothers in Christ Roy Tov and Nathanael Kapner are contrary to all men? Does that mean that my esteemed colleague Gilad Atzmon is contrary to all men? Does that mean that Richard Wurmbrand, who was tortured by the Communist regime in Romania and who later wrote the widely read book Tortured for Christ, is contrary to all men?
No. It means that the Jewish subversive ideology, which directly and directly springs from the Talmud and which has progressively become the theological and political worldview that largely guides the Jewish people, is contrary to all men.
So long that the Jews remain essentially and ideologically Talmudic, they are contrary to all men and therefore will seek to destroy nations and cultures. Benjamin Disraeli (1804-1881), British Prime Minister, seemed to have agreed with that view when he said in 1884:
“You never observe a great intellectual movement in Europe in which the Jews do not greatly participate.”
Once an ethnic Jew rejects the theological weltanschauung which springs from the Talmud, he ceases to be a “Jew” in the ideological sense and has become an enemy of those who still embrace the system.
Moreover, one does not need to be a Christian in order to reject the implications of the Talmudic madness. There are decent Jews everywhere who find themselves in conflict with the ideological numbo-jumbo and reject it altogether. The works of Norman Finkelstein (The Holocaust Industry and Beyond Chutzpah), Stephen M. Walt and John J. Mearsheimer (The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy), are perhaps examples of this.
This was the case for all of Jesus’ disciples, and this is relevant event today. It grieved me to learn that Roy Tov has been attacked several times by Jewish terrorists. He told me, “Troubles started after it was discovered I was an underground Christian and an IDF officer. I was put to test during Defensive Shield in the Bethlehem Nativity Church Siege and left Israel afterwards.”
In spite of that, he is still strong. As he continued, ‘I won’t be silenced, [although] the pain is unbearable.”
The “unbridgeable gulf ” which Maurice has described has come into sharper focus in the lives of many. Stephen Steinlight, former Director of National Affairs, stated bluntly and unashamedly:
“I’ll confess it, at least: like thousands of other typical Jewish kids of my generation, I was reared as a Jewish nationalist, even a quasi-separatist…More tacitly and subconsciously, I was taught the superiority of my people to the gentiles who had oppressed us.
“We were taught to view non-Jews as untrustworthy outsiders, people from whom sudden gusts of hatred might be anticipated, people less sensitive, intelligent, and moral than ourselves. We were also taught that the lesson of our dark history is that we could rely on no one.”
Michael Chabon of the New York Times concurs:
“As a Jewish child I was regularly instructed, both subtly and openly, that Jews, the people of Maimonides, Albert Einstein, Jonas Salk and Meyer Lansky, were on the whole smarter, cleverer, more brilliant, more astute than other people. And, duly, I would look around the Passover table, say, at the members of my family, and remark on the presence of a number of highly intelligent, quick-witted, shrewd, well-educated people filled to bursting with information, explanations and opinions on a diverse range of topics.”
Though Chabon tempers this statement by poking fun at “our own stupidity as a people,” this again shows how ingrained the smarter-than-thou attitude is. Sigmund Freud held the same core belief, boasting that Jews are smarter than everyone else.
Rabbi Saadya Grama of Beth Medrash Govoha asserts,
“Jewish success in the world is completely contingent upon the failure of other peoples. Jews experience good fortune only when gentiles experience catastrophe…The difference between Jews and gentiles is not historical or cultural, but rather genetic and unalterable.”
Rabbi Kook the Elder has a similar opinion:
“The difference between a Jewish soul and the souls of non-Jews—all of them in all different levels—is greater and deeper than the difference between a human soul and the souls of cattle.”
Rabbi Menachem Mandel expands on this view further, saying that “the body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of (members) of all nations of the world…A non-Jew’s entire reality is only vanity.”
I include these examples not to imply that all Jewish people and scholars hold these views, but merely so that one can understand this Jewish sense of superiority, as perpetrated by Jewish scholars and passed down, both covertly and overtly, in Jewish culture.
Lucy Dawidowicz, a historian whose work I will examine in the future, told us in her autobiography,
“Our sense of being Jews and therefore being different from non-Jews were nurtured in me and my sister from infancy. We were raised to know that the world was divided into two irreconcilable groups: We and They. They were the non-Jews, who hated us and wished to destroy us. But We will prevail, largely because of our moral virtues and mental endowments.”
Once again the Talmudic tone is still there, but this just shows how careless Dawidowicz was: she never seemed to think that this “We and They” thesis could be the cause of anti-Jewish reaction throughout the centuries.
How is it that Dawidowicz, who believes that Hitler intended to exterminate all the Jews of the world, never saw that that conflict could may well lie at the feet of the Talmudic reasoning?
“We and They” in history and the Middle East
The best way to test the “We and They” thesis is to see what it has produced in the twentieth and twenty-first centuries alone. We have already seen how the Bolshevik Revolution sought to destroy the Russian people.
In the twentieth-first century, the neo-Bolsheviks/Zionists/neoconservatives have destroyed Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and now are currently seeking to destroy Syria. Evidence does not seem to work for them, so lies are their best weapons.
Moreover, once lies and fabrications take precedence over truth, you will not need the approval of anyone to invade a sovereign country and spread bloodshed in the name of national security and self defense.
The Syrian government categorically denied that it had used chemical weapons and declared that if the United Nations does some serious investigation, they will find out that the rebels were responsible for the act. They moved on to say that they had evidence showing that the rebels carried out the job.
The evidence seems to indicate that the Assad government is correct. Syrian doctors and residents confirmed that the rebels used chemical weapons and blamed it on the Syrian government. Moreover, it has been pointed out that the Saudi government has been sending those chemical weapons to the rebels.
The Saudi government tried to bribe Vladimir Putin so that he would stop supporting Assad. In exchange, they offered Putin an easy access to oil. The Saudi government also played a major role in telling the entire world that Assad had used chemical weapons. Moreover, the Saudi government and Washington are ideologically in agreement with destabilizing Syria.
But that is not what the Zionist regime in the United States and Israel is looking for. Therefore this piece of evidence was rejected out of hand. Just a few days ago, United States officials declared that they would hold Assad responsible for chemical weapons even though Assad knew nothing about chemical weapons. What they ended up saying is that you are responsible for the death of your mother in law even though you knew nothing of her death! How is that going to work in a court of law?
Well, in the neo-Bolshevik world, you do not need evidence to make a case. All you have to do is listen to the orders given by the terrorist state known as Israel. In fact, the U.S. did not even consult U.S. Intelligence committees. Instead, they proceeded to craft a deceptive report saying that Assad has used chemical weapons without an iota of reputable evidence.
In the neo-Bolshevik world, if orders given by Israel happen to be lies and fabrications, then proceed to make them palpable so that people will believe them. Once they became palpable and are believed, then you can commit the some of the most horrible acts in human history and still get away with it. You can support Al Qaeda and still convince the Western world that you are fighting against terrorism.
Even Caroline Glick of the Jerusalem Post—of all people!—admits that the “rebel forces are dominated by al-Qaida.” Yet despite all of this, Glick contradicted herself in the same article by saying that
“The US and its allies share an interest in preventing Iran, Moscow or al-Qaida from winning the war or making any strategic gains from their involvement in the war.”
Glick is not that stupid, but the Zionist dream simply gives her no chance to think straight. She knows very well that you simply cannot support Al-Qaeda while pretending to fight Al-Qaeda.
This, by the way, was quite a surprise to Syrian editor Camille Otrakji, who said:
“For example, the Islamists and Al-Qaeda think, ‘We can have an alliance with the Americans or with any secular opposition forces, but later we will be in power,’ and the Americans think they can use Al-Qaeda temporarily, if they have to, to get rid of the Syrian regime, and they will somehow manage to get rid of them. So, unfortunately they are apparently working together.”
It is this wicked idea that the neo-Bolsheviks/Zionists/neoconservatives have been jamming down the West’s throat for the past fifty years or so when they took control over the media. Destroying nations and wrecking families in the Middle East have always been done in the name of national security and spreading democracy. It was Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and now it is Syria. Here’s how Bill O’Reilly suggests that the U.S. ought to take down Assad:
“It’s got to be done quickly. Bang, boom. And then let the chips fall where they may. But no more dead kids breathing poison gas.”
Even Robert Spencer himself declared that there is actually no evidence pointing to the fatuous idea that Assad had used chemical weapons. Vladimir Putin, like a good scientist, asks the U.S. to provide the evidence for the chemical-weapons claim. As he rationally declares,
“If they say that the [Syrian] governmental forces used weapons of mass destruction… and that they have proof of it, let them present it to the UN inspectors and the [UN] Security Council. Claims that the proof exists, but is classified and cannot be presented to anybody are below criticism. This is plain disrespect for their partners.”
But Bill didn’t get that memo because he is willfully blind.
Who wants a war with Syria?
The vast majority of Americans do not want a war with Syria;  many Syrians agree. Most French people do not want another false flag. Britain has already rejected Cameron’s plea to invade Syria. Because of this, Israeli officials declared bitterly that they cannot trust the international community. Globally, no one actually wants a war with Syria. And no serious intelligence expert agrees with the Zionist narrative on the use of chemical weapons.
The only people who really want the bloodshed are the Zionist regime. And the only people who will pay a huge price for this “bang” and “boom” are the average American and the Syrian people. The Israelis could care less about our precious soldiers. Gil Hoffman of the Jerusalem Post writes,
“The United States and European countries should attack Syria but Israel should not, two separate polls in weekend Hebrew newspapers found. While polls in the US and United Kingdom have found overwhelming opposition to their countries attacking Syria, a Gal Hadash poll published in Israel Hayom found that 66.6 percent of respondents would be in favor of American and European military intervention in Syria. Only 17% opposed a US/EU strike and 16.4% did not know.”
Here’s the rub: a number of neoconservatives even sent Obama a letter stating unequivocally that he needs to invade Syria.
Yet according to noisemaker Ann Coulter, Obama seeks to invade Syria because he is a Democrat! As such, “Democrats do not care about America’s national security.”
This is one of the dumbest statements ever uttered by Coulter. Coulter spent the entire time without even mentioning the neoconservatives who are pushing for a regime change. Those neocons include Elliott Abrams, Paul Berman, Eliot A. Cohen, Robert Kagan, William Kristol, Bernard-Henry Levy, James Traub, Eric Elderman, Martin Peretz, Leon Wieseltier, among others. Kristol himself writes, “We therefore feel an obligation to persuade the president to follow through on his promises and threats.”
Kristol once again writes in his article “Regime Change”:
“Regime change is not only Assad’s just reward. It’s also the best hope for a modicum of stability in and near Syria. And it’s the only message other WMD-loving dictators will understand. So Obama doesn’t have to talk about regime change right now. He just has to do it.”
It looks like those neocons are going to be bar-mitzvahed in Syria and then drink the blood of the Syrian civilians. Coulter cannot say that she knew nothing about the neoconservative cabal. The obvious conclusion here is that Coulter has been bought with a price. She is just a puppet doing the neocons’ dirty work.
William Kristol wants blood in the Middle East
If you want a quick answer to anti-Jewish reactions, you can blame the neoconservatives/neo-Bolsheviks. They do not want to admit this precisely because that would ruin their messianic plan for the Middle East and much of the Western world. Even Steven A. Cook of the Council of Foreign Relations, a neoconservative think tank, admits that an intervention in Syria would destroy the country (Cook accepts the false claim that Assad has used chemical weapons). But Kristol disagrees. He writes,
“No decent person can ignore what’s happening. What is supposed to be an enlightened world cannot remain silent. Each day, the Syrian civil war is taking on the chilling connotations of the Spanish Civil War. It heralds the end of an era and delineates the coming era.
“It’s not only innocent victims being buried in Damascus… Women and children who were apparently gassed to death are being buried in Damascus, along with the ideal of an international community and the illusion of international law. . . . It’s the end of the world that purports to be moral and enlightened.”
But get this: in the 1982 Lebanon War, Israel literally butchered 17 thousand men, women, and children. Kristol was a professor of political philosophy during that time and had the psychological and academic advantage to point this out in the media and in academic journals. He never did.
Moreover, Bush supported the sunnis back in 2007 through Saudi Arabia. Once again Kristol said nothing. Now he is telling us that Syria is his next victim and we should all listen to the wisdom of Benjamin Netanyahu. Kristol even calls the Syrians “Huns,” “lunatics,” and “insane”:
“Many in the West and Israel despise Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. But what’s happening in Syria proves the validity of Netanyahu’s warning that the greatest danger to world peace in the 21st century is the combination of unconventional weapons and unconventional regimes. Lunatics really are insane. Barbarians are really barbaric. Huns will be Huns.
“Those who act mercifully toward Huns bear direct responsibility for the fact that nuclear weapons are being built in Iran, chemical weapons are being used in Syria and doomsday weapons threaten the future of the Middle East. Those who underestimate the inherent danger of the Huns bear direct responsibility for the deaths of today’s victims, the Syrians, and tomorrow’s victims, the Israelis, Europeans and Americans.”
It sounds like Kristol was reading the pronouncements made by Israeli rabbis. Do not ever forget the words of rabbi Ovadia Yosef. According to him, Palestinians are “evil, bitter, enemies” of the Jewish people and must be “perish[ed] from this world.” The rest of us should never “be merciful” to them because they are unredeemable. They are “evil and damnable.” The best way to take care of those cancerous people is to kill them all: “You must send missiles to them and annihilate them.” Scholars like Paul R. Pillar calls this “a culture of hatred in Israel.”
The moral corruption of America is good for the Zionist regime
Kristol continues, “It’s time to break free of the moral relativism, multicultural hypocrisy and political correctness that prevent us from seeing our evil neighborhood as it really is.”
Kristol is right. It is high time to see our evil neighborhood as it really is.
But the sad part is that the vast majority Americans cannot see the true nature of our evil neighborhood because the same neighborhood has corrupted their morals. While the war party was working hard to invade Syria, Summer Redstone’s MTV (real name Summer Murray Rothstein) was promoting the Miley Cyrus’s new sexual corruption. Larry Rudolph, Cyrus’ manager, said:
“It could not have gone better. The fans got it. The rest eventually will.” The question that must be asked is this: What did Cyrus and Rudolph want the fans and the rest of us to get?
It was Thomas Aquinas who articulated the principle that lust will morally and intellectually blind any person. Once you become blind, you simply have lost the capacity to see things as they really are. Aquinas wrote thousands of years ago:
“Just as bodily blindness is the privation of the principle of bodily sight, so blindness of mind is the privation of the principle of mental or intellectual sight.
Now this has a threefold principle. One is the light of natural reason, which light, since it pertains to the species of the rational soul, is never forfeit from the soul, and yet, at times, it is prevented from exercising its proper act, through being hindered by the lower powers which the human intellect needs in order to understand, for instance in the case of imbeciles and madmen…
“Another principle of intellectual sight is a certain habitual light superadded to the natural light of reason, which light is sometimes forfeit from the soul. This privation is blindness, and is a punishment, in so far as the privation of the light of grace is a punishment. Hence it is written concerning some (Wis. 2:21): ‘Their own malice blinded them.’”
In other words, both Cyrus and Rudolph want the rest of us to be morally and intellectually blind. Cyrus and Rudolph probably did not know that they were implicating what the Israelis did to the Palestinians in 2002.
Right after Israeli military forces took over Palestinian TV stations in Ramallah in the West Bank, they immediately shut down all other TV stations and started broadcasting pornography. The Israelis learned long ago that the best way to corrupt the moral and political capacity of any individual is to entice him with lust.
This is the message that Rudolph has tried to tell us, and Cyrus was used as a sexual puppet to bring this message about. Once we are all blind, we cannot see that a war with Syria will ultimately lead to more chaos in the Middle East and more poverty both in America and much of the Western world.
It has been reported that 430,000 people in Philadelphia alone live below the poverty line, and “some 200,000 live on income that is less than half the federal poverty threshold, placing them in the ‘deep poverty’ category…” In Europe, particularly in Britain, poverty has risen to an astronomical rate.
But who cares about those rotten scoundrels? Did not Rabbi Ovadia Yoself declare that “the sole purpose of non-Jews is to serve Jews”? If you cannot serve them, then you are ultimately useless. Yosef continued,
“In Israel, death has no dominion over them… With gentiles, it will be like any person – they need to die, but [God] will give them longevity. Why? Imagine that one’s donkey would die, they’d lose their money. This is his servant… That’s why he gets a long life, to work well for this Jew.”
Yosef again and again proved to be right. The United States sends 3 billion dollars every year to Israel, and the NSA spends at least $73 billion every year on programs designed to spy on virtually every American. What do the average American and much of the Western world get in return? More perpetual wars in the Middle East.
This subversion of America is essentially and theologically Masonic, and this Masonic invasion was the backdrop of the French Revolution. It subverted the moral order then, and it has already subverted both the political and moral order in America. An essential element of that Masonic ideology is “to bring about the domination of Israel.”
If America is to survive the next one hundred years or so years, she will have to stop her unconditional support to the terrorist state. Until then, America will continue to be a laughing stock among the nations.
Jonas E. Alexis has degrees in mathematics and philosophy. He studied education at the graduate level. His main interests include U.S. foreign policy, the history of the Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the new book Zionism vs. the West: How Talmudic Ideology is Undermining Western Culture. He teaches mathematics in South Korea.