“It’s not neo-Nazis. It’s Judeo-Nazis… Racism, murderousness and profound hatred originating in a religious-messianic worldview…is fueled by the occupation and settlement enterprise.” Uri Misgav, Haaretz
“Netanyahu and other politicians have instilled a terrible and unnecessary fear in the Israeli public…” Uzi Eilam, former head of the Israel Atomic Energy Commission
…by Jonas E. Alexis
The late Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, known as Lubovitcher Rebbe and the seventh of the Chabad-Lubavitch movement, has become a household name in the Jewish community, in some neoconservative circles, and most importantly in the political landscape.
Schneerson died in 1994. Ronn Torossian of FrontPage, a neoconservative magazine, declares,
“Schneerson, in a timeless manner, used authentic Jewish values to make the world a better place – and his disciples continue to work to make America and the world brighter and better.”
Schneerson’s wisdom, Torossian tells us, “was personally imparted to politicians of all political parties – and Americans of all religious and political stripes – including world leaders Ronald Reagan, Robert F. Kennedy, Menachem Begin and others.”
Schneershon, Torossian continues, is “the most influential rabbi in modern history.” We are told that
“Schneerson had great influence on numerous politicians, many of whom would seek his advice. During his years as Rebbe, he was visited by Presidents, Prime Ministers, Governors, Senators, Congressmen and Mayors.
“Many politicians came to him during their campaigns, courting his blessing and endorsement. Notable among them are prominent American politicians such as John F. Kenney, Robert Kennedy, Franklin D. Roosevelt, Jr, Jacob Javits, Ed Koch, Rudy Giuliani, David Dinkins and Joe Lieberman.
“Rabbi Schneerson always took an interest into the affairs of the state of Israel. Although he never was in Israel, he had many admirers there, and many among Israel’s top leadership made it a point to visit him.
“One of Israel’s presidents, Zalman Shazar, who was of Lubavitch ancestry, would visit Schneerson and corresponded extensively with him.
“Menachem Begin, Ariel Sharon, Yitzhak Rabin, Shimon Peres, Moshe Katzav, and later, Benjamin Netanyahu also paid visits and sought advice, along with numerous other less famous politicians, diplomats, military officials, and media producers.”
Netanyahu himself got his inspiration from Schneerson.
“Benjamin Netanyahu said that while serving as Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations in 1984, Schneerson told him: ‘you will be serving in a house of darkness, but remember, that even in the darkest place; the light of a single candle can be seen far and wide…’ Netanyahu later retold this episode in a speech at the General Assembly, on Sept 23, 2011.”
Many biographers and authors and polemicists present a sanitized version of Schneerson and never produce his deep-seated Talmudic ideology. In the process, those polemicists have indirectly and sometimes deliberately exalted Schneerson above the political and moral heavens.
What did the great rabbi and Talmudic metaphysician actually teach his disciples and indirectly many world leaders such as Netanyahu?
Schneerson believed that “a non-Jew should be punished by death if he kills an embryo, even if the embryo is non-Jewish, while the Jew should not be, even if the embryo is Jewish.”
The great Rabbi expanded on this Talmudic metaphysics in 1965 this way:
“The difference between a Jewish and a non-Jewish person stems from the common expression: ‘Let us differentiate.’ Thus, we do not have a case of profound change in which a person is merely on a superior level. Rather, we have a case of ‘let us differentiate’ between totally different species.
“This is what needs to be said about the body: the body of a Jewish person is of a totally different quality from the body of [members] of all nations of the world…
“The Jewish body ‘looks as if it were in substance similar to bodies of non-Jews,’ but the meaning…is that the bodies only seem to be similar in material substance, outward look and superficial quality.
“The difference of the inner quality, however, is so great that the bodies should be considered as completely different species. This is the reason why the Talmud states that there is an halachic difference in attitude about the bodies of non-Jews [as opposed to the bodies of Jews] ‘and their bodies are in vain…’
“An even greater difference exists in regard to the soul. Two contrary types of soul exist, a non-Jewish soul comes from three satanic spheres, while the Jewish soul stems from holiness…
“The body of a Jewish embryo is on a higher level than is the body of a non-Jew…We therefore ask: Why should a non-Jew be punished if he kills even a non-Jewish embryo while a Jew should not be punished even if he kills a Jewish embryo?
“The answer can be understood by [considering] the general difference between Jews and non-Jews: A Jew was not created as a means for some [other] purpose; he himself is the purpose, since the substance of all [divine] emanations was created only to serve the Jews.
“In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth” means that [the heavens and the earth] were created for the sake of the Jews, who are called the ‘beginning.’
“This means everything, all developments, all discoveries, the creation, including the heavens and the earth—are vanity compared to the Jews. The important things are the Jews, because they do not exist for any [other] aim; they themselves are [the divine] aim.”
Unless you understand that the great rabbi was drawing his conclusion from the Talmud—a book that is full of hatred of the Goyim and other perceived enemies such as Titus, who destroyed the Jewish Temple in A.D. 70, and Christ, who confronted the Pharisees and rabbis of his day by saying that their father is Satan—you probably will not understand that this has been the bedrock upon which current Zionism and messianic politics are based.
The Jewish Temple, as Jewish scholar Naftali S. Cohn declares, was
“a symbol of Judaea itself…The Temple is a synecdoche for Judaea, and its defeat corresponds fully to the defeat of Judaea and its people…When they destroyed the Temple, the Romans, in a figurative sense, critically wounded Judaea.”
Once that symbol was destroyed, the rabbis had to produce a text over the centuries which progressively espoused hatred, false accusation and indeed blasphemous concepts toward the Romans and largely toward all mankind. Titus for example is accused in the Talmud of fornicating with a whore on a Torah scroll in the Temple.
Throughout the centuries, Jewish revolutionaries had directly or indirectly carried that Talmudic scar with them and sought to destroy civilization by covert means—be they sexual liberation and perversion as in psychoanalysis, political subversion as in the Bolshevik Revolution and later Neoconservatism in America, moral decadence as in Hollywood, artistic degradation as in Piss Christ, etc.
One of those revolutionaries who understood this Talmudic duty was none other than Sigmund Freud, whose subversive ideology we have examined in a previous article. Once again, listen to Freud carefully here:
“My longing for Rome is, by the way, deeply neurotic. It is connected with my high school hero-worship of the Semitic Hannibal, and this year I did not reach Rome any more than he did from Lake Trasimeno.’”
Even before the Temple was destroyed in A.D. 70, the Apostle Paul lamented that temptations “befell me by the lying in wait of the Jews,” who “are hostile to the entire human race” (1 Thessalonians 2:15; CEB version) or “are adversaries to all men.” In other words, they “oppose all mankind.”
If you doubt this statement, just look at some of those countries where Jewish revolutionary movements have played a central role. As a case study, look at four specific countries: Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, and Syria, where people are being slaughtered daily like animals.
Later we will include the Ukraine, where Victoria Nuland (born Nudelman) has played a central force in establishing a neo-Nazi regime.
Fred Kaplan, a fervent supporter of the war in Iraq and columnist for Slate magazine, immediately pulled back just one week prior to the invasion because he quickly realized that Bush and others had no clue of what they were doing. In other words, Bush and others were just puppets on a string. Kaplan wrote,
“I knew immediately they were going to fu$k it up.”
Now we are left with more suffering and devastation than ever. In Iraq alone, it has been recently reported that over
“434,000 men, women and children have fled their homes since fighting escalated in January this year…Displacement jumped after fighters deliberately breached a dam in Anbar, flooding the area and forcing some 72,000 people from their homes.”
Just yesterday, 80 people were killed and 88 others were wounded in Iraq. What if I change this sentence to “80 Jewish people”? How many articles would crop up in the New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, the Weekly Standard, Commentary, FrontPage, the Jerusalem Post, Times of Israel, and other Zionist media outlets?
Once again, the plot thickens: Jewish blood is more precious than Gentile blood—in this case, Palestinian blood. We basically were in Iraq to drink or spill blood. As one observer put it,
“If we were not even able to provide the most basic of liberties and freedoms to the people living in those nations, what in the world did we actually accomplish by ‘liberating’ them?
“Just look at what has happened in Afghanistan. We have been at war in Afghanistan for more than a dozen years, and yet things are so bad for Christians in that country at this point that there is not a single church left.
“We find a similar story in Iraq. It is estimated that before the invasion, there were up to 2 million Christians living in Iraq. Now that number is down to less than 450,000, and it is falling fast.
“In fact, things are so dire for Iraq’s Christian community that some Iraqi Christian leaders are warning that Christians may soon become ‘extinct’ in that nation…
“As the mass exodus of Iraq’s Christians continues, so does the call for ending the plight of those who have remained. Like Iraq’s ancient Jewish community before them, one of the world’s oldest Christian communities may soon cease to exist.
“The disappearance of Iraq’s religious minorities has been a troubling trend since the US-led invasion in 2003, and it has threatened to end the cultural diversity of Iraq.
“As the violence in the country spikes and religious intolerance grows, many Christians, Yazidis, Mandaeans and other minority community members are leaving the country.”
“Last week, the head of the Iraqi Catholic Church sent a chilling warning that Iraq’s 2,000-year-old Christian community is on the brink of extinction as new waves of Christians take the journey of exodus.
“In the end, what did we actually accomplish? The Obama administration likes to brag about how it got rid of Qaddafi and “liberated” Libya, but now al-Qaeda is in control of much of the country and things are much worse for Christians than ever before…
“Ever since U.S.-backed, al-Qaeda-linked terrorists overthrew Gaddafi, Christians—including Americans—have indeed suffered extreme persecution. Churches have been bombed; Christians have been tortured and killed (including for refusing to convert); and nuns have been threatened.”
If the Talmud condemns Titus, Balaam, and Christ; if it declares that Balaam is sitting in hot semen; if Christ is sitting forever in boiling excrement, then those who seem to be the descendent of Titus and those who try to follow Christ will receive the same treatment.
The historical and converging evidence indicates that this has been the case, as many Jewish revolutionaries and rabbis pronounced deliberate maledictions against the Goyim, Christ and his followers throughout the Middle Ages and beyond.
Now you understand why politicians do not really care about the Goyim dying in the Middle East and elsewhere. Now you understand why people can be burned alive in the Ukraine and Western nations stay quiet because no one wants to offend the dreadful few. Even in the first century, some even scared to say something “because they feared the Jews” (John 9:22). Fear got the best of them.
Now you know why Netanyahu, who has been viewed by many in Israel as an ideologue, can say things like he wants Israel to be separated from the Palestinians, and no public officials would dare challenge him.
Now you understand why the media and the state department, according to Vladimir Goldstein of the Slavic Studies at Brown University, can manipulate the situation in the Ukraine for their own political ends.
And now you know why Jewish psychologist Steven Pinker can write books such as The Better Angels of our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined, when in fact Jewish violence in the Middle East and elsewhere through black operation has skyrocketed since the founding of Israel.
As rabbi Yaacov Perrin put it two decades ago, “One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail.”
But this is not limited to Palestinians. Just recently, 181 people lost their lives in Ukraine, while 293 others got wounded. And how does President Obama respond? Well, he plans to pour billions of dollars into the situation.
Some politicians may not like Perrin’s attitude on the surface, but politically and ideologically those same politicians will not say a word about Palestinians and other goyim dying daily due to the neoconservative and nefarious ideology. In other words, the indirectly shake hands with their oppressors.
Here is a classic example.
A few days ago, a gunman opened fire at the Jewish Museum in Brussels and killed three people. Two of them happened to be an Israeli couple from Tel Aviv.
With little information on their hands, a flood of Jewish commentators jumped on the anti-Semitic and anti-Israeli bandwagon. Ben Cohen of the neoconservative magazine Commentary wrote:
“Saturday’s brutal shooting at the Jewish Museum in Brussels was a stark reminder that, for its Jewish communities, Europe is rapidly becoming a dark continent, one where extreme violence lurks behind the constant stream of anti-Zionist and anti-Semitic invective found on extremist websites and mainstream media outlets alike.”
Caroline Glick of the Jerusalem Post declared,
“Anti-Israel incitement is ubiquitous in Europe and is appearing in ever-widening circles of the Western world as a whole.”
Raya Kalenova, the executive vice president of the European Jewish Congress, said,
“The spirit of the Jewish people, the Jewish community, here in Belgium is really very, very low. They do not even report anti-Semitic attacks. They feel that it is useless to report and they do not feel protected. For sure, the general atmosphere is not good here in Belgium, especially because of anti-Israeli sentiment.”
Benjamin Netanyahu, who, according to former head of Israel’s Atomic Energy Commission (Uzi Eilam), is using “Iran threat for political gain,” quickly used the opportunity to accuse Europe of “hypocrisy.” Netanyahu moved on to say that the incident was the result of
“endless incitement against Jews and their state. Slander and lies against the State of Israel continue to be heard on European soil even as the crimes against humanity and acts of murder being perpetrated in our region are systematically ignored.
“Our response to this hypocrisy is to constantly state the truth, continue a relentless fight against terrorism and build up our strength.”
Israeli Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman added,
“This act of terror is the result of anti-Israeli incitement. ‘Pro-Palestinian’ activities which like in darker times call to boycott ‘Jewish products’ are anti-Semitic activities, and nothing more.”
Henry Goodman, president of the Jewish Community Center in Brussels, told CNN:
“We didn’t expect such a terrible act. Since we don’t know who has done it or the reason, we can only imagine that it is an act of pure anti-Semitism.”
My heart goes out to the families of the victims. But there are a number of points that need to be considered here.
When a few Jewish people die in a Jewish Museum, the entire continent of Europe has once again become dark!
But when hundreds upon hundreds of innocent families and civilians die every single day in the Middle East and in the Ukraine due to the neoconservative ideology, it is part of democracy, and Cohen stays quiet.
Here’s the kicker: 2,249 people were killed last month in Iraq alone, and 1,953 others were wounded! Can Cohen and others really justify their conspiracy of silence on the basis of reason and logic?
Cohen may reject the Talmudic premise on the surface, but politically he abides by its nefarious ideology, which is another way of saying that he indirectly supports rabbi Schneerson’s Talmudic metaphysics.
There is a second issue that Cohen and others will never get the courage to address. The BBC has recently declared that at least one individual (29-year-old Mehdi Nemmouche) who took responsibility for the incident in Brussels is a jihadist from Syria! Other news outlets, including the Jerusalem Post, declare the same thing. One news outlet declares that Nemmouche
“would deepen concerns among European governments about citizens, often with Islamic immigrant backgrounds, going to fight in Syria and bringing back political and sectarian violence to Europe on their return.”
The million-dollar question is this: which country has supported—and is supporting—the Jihadists in Syria? Iran? Russia? China? North Korea? Japan? Cuba? Venezuela? Iraq? Pakistan?
Well, it’s none of the above. The country that is supporting Jihadists is the United States of America—or shall we say the Zionist States of America (ZSA)—with a strong support from their masters: the Israeli regime.
Moreover, at least 3,000 jihadists “with passports from Western nations [are] now fighting in Syria, most for al-Qaeda faction…”
Shouldn’t America and Israel, and in indeed much of the West, take some responsibility for the death of the people who died in Brussels?
In response to the incident, European Jewish Congress president Moshe Kantor declared,
“There is a wave of terror against the Jews in Europe, and we need far greater cooperation and resources to catch these people before they act, to clamp down much harder on the spread of hate, and focus on gathering intelligence on potential threats, especially against those who [would] become global jihadists by traveling to places like Syria, where they learn hate, terror and murder.”
He continued to assert that “If prevention isn’t set as the highest priority,‘we will see these types of attacks more frequently, against all populations.’”
If Kantor is really serious, he would start telling the United States and Israel to stop supporting the Syrian jihadists.
If Kantor wants to easily disprove conspiracy theorists, who keep quoting the Protocols as if it were a legal and scholarly document, he would also tell the NSA to stop spying on countries with no significant political power such as the Bahamas, the Philippines, and even Kenya. But there is no indication that Kantor has the moral fiber to take that route.
Let us not forget that politicians such as John McCain, David Patraeus, Hilary Clinton, and New Jersey Senator Robert Menendez have advocated arming the Syrian terrorists from time immemorial. The U.S. Department of State admitted that hundreds of millions of dollars have been sent to Syria.
The Syrian rebels/terrorists have been meeting with other Islamist terrorists since 2011. The terrorist group al-Nusra for example attacked at least 600 major cities, causing the death of Syrian civilians during the war against Assad.
The Obama administration labeled them terrorists, but the rebels resisted the label. Recently, warmonger and puppet John R. Bolton, a former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, has sanitized the Jihadists and called them “moderate opposition forces.”
Similarly, Susan Rice, in order to justify the U.S. supporting those jihadists, called them “moderate.” She told CNN that
“the United States has ramped up its support for the moderate vetted opposition, providing lethal and non-lethal support where we can to support both the civilian opposition and the military opposition.”
Former U.S. ambassador to Syria Robert Ford told the PBS in an interview a few days ago, “We need – and we have long needed – to help moderates in the Syrian opposition with both weapons and other non-lethal assistance.”
In her upcoming memoir, Hillary Clinton admits that she wanted to arm the Syrian terrorists, but Obama had second thoughts.
As one observer put it, those people can’t even name one “moderate” to make their case. And it is so sad that many of these people went to law school, where evidence, documents and rationality play a major role in proving a case.
Those “moderate” terrorists have recently “executed a 14-year-old boy and threw his body on a road in the eastern Arsal region.” Amnesty International has also reported recently that those terrorists have “targeted families working in a farming community in Hassakeh province in May,” and in the process have killed fifteen civilians, including seven children.
Yet Obama once again declared that Americans still had to support this proxy war against the Syrian government, even though Hilary Clinton herself admitted that jihadists were behind the Syrian rebels!
In Aleppo, Syria’s largest city, they controlled the power plant and even presided over a court that legislated Islamic law. Ari Ratner, a fellow at the Truman National Security Project and former Middle East advisor in the Obama State Department, declared that those terrorists are “scary,” but Ratner still wanted to oust Assad.
The United Kingdom too was planning to provide the Syrian rebels with ammunition in December 2012.
By the middle of December, the United States signed an official deployment order to send at least four hundred American soldiers to Turkey in order to help oust Assad. Germany and the Netherlands also sent troops there. NATO had already supported Turkey at the beginning of the month.
As the days went by, Europe was largely united in helping the rebels and terrorists oust Assad. Other countries such as France, Turkey, and the Gulf states put their stamp of approval on the Syrian rebels.
As it turned out, the United States was training several members of the Syrian rebels on the borders of Jordan, just like Bush trained the MEK in Nevada in order to create a clandestine war against Iran.
Iranian intellectuals such as Professor Muhammad Sahimi wrote against the United States removing the MEK as a terrorist organization, and the U.S. knew very well that the MEK had committed terrorist acts over the years, but once again the Zionist regime seemed to have the upper hand.
In October, Obama gave a hint of what he was going to do by sending more than 150 U.S. forces to Jordan.
As former Mossad agent Efraim Halevy and the neoconservative crowd have declared, the war in Syria is in favor of Israel because in the end it will politically and ideologically help destabilize Iran.
Moreover, Bush started a covert and terrorist operation to literally destabilize Iran while in office. As noted journalist Seymour M. Mersh put it in 2012,
“It was here [in Nevada] that the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) conducted training, beginning in 2005, for members of the Mujahideen-e-Khalq, a dissident Iranian opposition group known in the West as the M.E.K. . . .
“The M.E.K.’s ties with Western intelligence deepened after the fall of the Iraqi regime in 2003, and JSOC began operating inside Iran in an effort to substantiate the Bush Administration’s fears that Iran was building the bomb at one or more secret underground locations.
“Funds were covertly passed to a number of dissident organizations, for intelligence collection and, ultimately, for anti-regime terrorist activities.
“Directly, or indirectly, the M.E.K. ended up with resources like arms and intelligence. Some American-supported covert operations continue in Iran today, according to past and present intelligence officials and military consultants.
“Despite the growing ties, and a much-intensified lobbying effort organized by its advocates,M.E.K. has remained on the State Department’s list of foreign terrorist organizations – which meant that secrecy was essential in the Nevada training.
“‘We did train them here, and washed them through the Energy Department because the D.O.E. owns all this land in southern Nevada,’ a former senior American intelligence official told me.
“‘We were deploying them over long distances in the desert and mountains, and building their capacity in communications — coördinating commo is a big deal.”
But who was really behind all of this? Was Bush really a puppet following the guiding principles of the dreadful few? Well, let us listen to Hersh once again:
“The former senior intelligence official I spoke with seconded the NBC report that the Israelis were working with the M.E.K., adding that the operations benefitted from American intelligence. He said that the targets were not ‘Einsteins.’
“‘The goal is to affect Iranian psychology and morale,’ he said, and to ‘demoralize the whole system — nuclear delivery vehicles, nuclear enrichment facilities, power plants.’
“Attacks have also been carried out on pipelines. He added that the operations are ‘primarily being done by M.E.K. through liaison with the Israelis, but the United States is now providing the intelligence.’
“An adviser to the special-operations community told me that the links between the United States and M.E.K. activities inside Iran had been long-standing. ‘Everything being done inside Iran now is being done with surrogates,’ he said.”
In short, Bush, Obama, and much of the neoconservative and Zionist mafia are guilty of supporting terrorism and therefore should be spending time in jail. In fact, according to the law, they could receive even death penalty. Listen to this:
“Whoever knowingly provides material support or resources to a foreign terrorist organization, or attempts or conspires to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 15 years, or both, and, if the death of any person results, shall be imprisoned for any term of years or for life.
“To violate this paragraph, a person must have knowledge that the organization is a designated terrorist organization (as defined in subsection (g)(6)), that the organization has engaged or engages in terrorist activity (as defined in section 212(a)(3)(B) of the Immigration and Nationality Act), or that the organization has engaged or engages in terrorism (as defined in section 140(d)(2) of the Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Fiscal Years 1988 and 1989).”
But in the Zionist/neoconservative/neo-Bolshevik age, it is pretty hard to keep political criminals behind bars. For example,
“May 2009, the justice department called off the prosecution of what seemed a well-supported case against two AIPAC agents, Steven Rosen and Keith Weissmann, for spying on the U.S. government.
“In 2004, the FBI had launched an investigation into actions of the Iraqi politician Ahmed Chalabi, the adviser-in-exile enthusiastically cited by the neoconservatives who pressed hardest for the war on Iraq.
“The investigation of Chalabi had been unexpected, too; and as with the prosecution of AIPAC agents, an action by the justice department, surprisingly launched, had been as abruptly terminated.”
Once again, what we are seeing here is that the so-called war on terror is only good for the dreadful few. Listen to this. In 2010,
“Number of American civilians who died worldwide in terrorist attacks: 8 — Minimum number who died after being struck by lightning: 29…
With the exception of the Philippines, more Americans died from road crashes in all of the 160 countries surveyed than from homicides.
“The U.S. Department of State reports that only 17 U.S. citizens were killed worldwide as a result of terrorism in 2011. That figure includes deaths in Afghanistan, Iraq and all other theaters of war.
“In contrast, the American agency which tracks health-related issues – the U.S. Centers for Disease Control – rounds up the most prevalent causes of death in the United States:”
I guess we should declare a global war on lightening and car crashes as well! As John Mueller of Ohio State University and Mark G. Stewart of the University of Newcastle (Australia) write,
“the likelihood any person living outside a war zone will be killed by a terrorist is so low that the risk can, applying accepted conventional standards, be considered minimal.”
Even Fareed Zakaria actually came out in 2012 and declared that if we end the “war on terror,” we would save billions of dollars.
Iranian leaders were not, are not, and have never been oblivious to what is happening. And to destabilize Iran, anything goes. If you have to lie or sign pacts with terrorist groups such as the Syrian jihadists, so be it.
Amir Taheri, an Iranian-born journalist and neoconservative who frequently appears on Fox News, National Review, the New York Post, and the Wall Street Journal, declared in 2006 that the Iranian parliament required Jews to wear strips of yellow cloth attached to their clothing.
The accusation turned out to be a bold lie concocted by Taheri himself. The National Post, which published Taheri’s story, retracted it and apologized.
“When asked about Taheri’s penchant for falsehood, his publicist replied that accuracy is ‘a luxury’ where Iran is concerned: ‘As much as being accurate is important, in the end what’s important is to side with what’s right. What’s wrong is siding with the terrorists.”
Bernard Lewis, whose ideology we will examine in more detail in a future article, summoned a date back in 2006 on which he said Iran could have unleashed its nuclear bombs on the world.
By the end of spring 2013 reports began to circulate that “the West and its allies cynically bleed Syria to weaken Iran.”
By the end of January 2013 Israel struck Syria, using the lame excuse that Israel wanted to make sure that Syria did not transfer its chemical weapons to Hezbollah or Al-Qaida.
The Syrian government declared that the Israelis attacked a scientific research facility, but U.S. sources claimed it was a convoy carrying weapons to Hezbollah.Given the Zionist premise, the latter claim carried the day, even though the attack was illegal.
But Haaretz later declared that the Syrian government was correct, that Israel attacked the Scientific Studies and Research Center in Jamarya, right outside Damascus. And who gave Israel a green light to attack Syria? The Zionist States of America.
By February 2013, ex-intelligence chief in Israel Amos Yadlin made the declaration that Israel ought to “forge relationships with new Sunni powers, and work with them to isolate ‘the big enemy, which is Iran.’”
According to Yadlin, Israel ought to strike deals with terrorists in order to destabilize Iran. Does that make any sense at all? I thought Israel and America were fighting against terrorism? What we are seeing here once again is that Israel and America cannot continue their Zionist plan without terrorism.
In response to Obama’s recent speech at West Point, Joachim Hagopian, a graduate of the same school and former army officer, wrote,
“For nearly seven decades the US Central Intelligence Agency has been the chief operating engineer and primary culprit covertly orchestrating this entire diabolical front engaging in acts of terrorism to ensure that Obama’s unabashed exceptionalism in the form of an overstretched, morally bankrupt, imperialistic American Empire in decline reaches every corner of the planet…
“The fact is the neocon network is far more America’s enemy than any so called al Qaeda network…
“The label al Qaeda was eventually attached to Osama’s Islamic freedom fighters whose mission was to support fellow Moslems everywhere oppressed by Western imperialism.
“As the young emerging leader of the Mujahideen fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan, the US with CIA support had been financing, arming and training Osama and his randy brand of terrorists since the late 1980’s and continued sponsoring their terrorist activities throughout the 1990’s in Bosnia and Kosovo. Many of the Mujahideen fighters were on the US payroll.
“Michael Springman, Chief of Visa Section at the US General Consulate in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia from 1987 to 1989 disclosed that many CIA personnel worked undercover issuing US visas to a number of the same terrorists later allegedly involved in the 9/11 attacks.
“The CIA was sponsoring state supported terrorism bringing them to the US and training them at various US military schools, fine tuning their terror skills.
“After 9/11 from an LA Times article Springman recognized a number of the terrorist hijackers amongst those freely receiving visas years before and promptly informed the FBI.
“In fact 15 visas belonging to the alleged 9/11 terrorists had been attained in Jeddah. But not surprisingly, the FBI never bothered getting back to Springman.
“A similar story was heard from Sibel Edmonds a former FBI translator and government whistleblower who became aware of an Iranian FBI informant who had been on the payroll for ten years in April 2001 warning the FBI that al Qaeda terrorists were planning to fly airplanes into key buildings in several US cities.”
Hagopian has a point. He continues in another article saying,
“Psychopaths dominate the halls of power in both the United States and throughout the world. The current economic, political, military and legal system breeds psychopaths, rewarding psychopathic behavior and punishing those with conscience and integrity.
“Psychopaths will naturally be drawn to and converge at the apex of the power pyramid as much from their own drive for ambitious power as the hierarchical system that both requires and reinforces those who can comfortably operate without conscience, guilt or any genuine level of empathy toward others.
“Psychopaths are in love with power and risk taking, masters of manipulation, self-serving opportunism and self-aggrandizement, and hold doctorates in deceit and deception.
“Psychopaths are super intelligent charmers who are highly skilled at playing others in order to get what they want. They are keenly perceptive at reading people, understanding their motives and values, brilliant at learning their weaknesses and blind spots, and highly effective at inducing both sympathy and guilt in others.”
It should become clear by now that the war on terror has been spearheaded by the dreadful few to terrorize much of the Western world for their own gain. And, like Smigol in the Lord of the Rings who loves and hates the ring of power at the same time, the dreadful few love and hate terrorism at the same time. They love terrorism when it suits their ideological agenda, but hate it when it begins to kill their own children.
They also love and hate Nazis. For example Victoria Nuland (Nudelman) loves Nazis, and she was the mediator who
“began funneling money into the coffers of the Ukrainian fascists, the descendants of Stepan Bandera, a Ukrainian nationalist who collaborated with the Nazis during World War II and with the CIA and the Bundesnachrichtendienst (Germany’s intelligence agency) under former Nazi Reinhard Gehlen beginning in 1956.”
But Putin, the Zionist world tells us, is the “new Hitler” who must be expunged from the pages of history.
You remember Otto Skorzeny, “one of the great heroes—if not the greatest—of Nazi Germany” who “had become a daredevil commando officer who carried out spectacular operations”? Well, shortly after World War II, the Mossad quickly recruited him in their covert operation.
Lansky was a Zionist who poured millions upon millions of dollars into “Israeli business and industry.” When one of the Mossad agents telephoned him and said, “I am an Israeli, operating in Paris, and I need your help for the Zionist state,” Lansky quickly responded, “No problem. In a month I shall be in Lusanne, in Switzerland. Let’s meet there.”
As E. Michael Jones put it last April,
“The collaboration between Nazis and Zionists is not as surprising as it seems at first glance. Both ideologies are grounded in an unshakable belief in racial superiority. The only difference is which group is racially superior.
“This may explain what would otherwise constitute anomalous behavior, as when the Israeli ambassador to the Ukraine made overtures to the fascist Right Sector…
“As if to prove that politics continue to make strange bedfellows, Israeli soldiers were also involved in the Maidan square demonstrations fighting alongside the Ukrainian fascists.
“In an interview with the Jewish Telegraph Agency, an officer in the Shu’alei Shimshon reconnaissance battalion of the Givati infantry brigade of the IDF explained how he headed a force of 40 men and women, ‘including several fellow IDF veterans,’ in violent clashes with Ukrainian government forces, clashes which eventually brought down the government…
“What is clear is Delta’s (the pseudonym for the IDF officer) willingness to work with anti-Semitic Neo-Nazis to achieve common political goals.”
 Uri Misgav, “Israel: Not neo-Nazis, Judeo-Nazis,” Haaretz, May 30, 2014.
 “Israeli Nuclear Expert: Netanyahu Using Iran Threat for Political Gain,” Haaretz, May 8, 2014.
 Ronn Torossian, “‘Rebbe’: The Most Influential Rabbi in Modern History,” FrontPage Magazine, June 2, 2014.
 A classic example would be Samuel Heilman and Menachem Friedman’s The Rebbe: The Life and Afterlife of Menachem Mendel Schneerson (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010).
 Quoted in Israel Shahak and Norton Mevzinsky, Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel (New York: Pluto Press, 2004), 59.
 Ibid., 59-60.
 Naftali S. Cohn, The Memory of the Temple and the Making of the Rabbis (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2013), 93.
 Peter Schaeffer, Jesus in the Talmud (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007), 83.
 See for example Peter Schaeffer, Jesus in the Talmud (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2007).
 See for example Israel Jacob Yuval, Two Nations in Your Womb: Perceptions of Jews and Christians in Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2006); Ruth Langer, Cursing the Christians?: A History of the Birkat HaMinim (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011); Rodney Stark, The Rise of Christianity: How the Obscure, Marginal Jesus Movement Became the Dominant Religious Force in the Western World in a Few Centuries (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1996), 50-51.
 See for example Trita Parsi, “Former Israeli Nuclear Head: No Iran Bomb for Ten Years—If They Even Want It,” National Interest, May 8, 2014.
 Quoted in Amy Teibel, “Netanyahu Wants Separation from Palestinians, Official Says,” Bloomberg, June 6, 2014.
 Vladimir Goldstein, “Why Everything You’ve Read About Ukraine Is Wrong,” Forbes, May 19, 2014.
 Dan Fesperman, “Israel Tortures Palestinian Prisoners Despite Peace Accords, Rights Group Says,” Baltimore Sun, Jun. 15, 1994; Joel Greenberg, “Israel Reports Admit Abuses by Security Forces/Unsealed Probe of Shin Bet Details Harsh Treatment of Palestinians,” San Francisco Chronicle, Feb. 10, 2000; Joel Greenberg, “Israel Rethinks Interrogation of Arabs,” NY Times, Aug. 14, 1994.
 Michael Kaplan, “When Israelis Teach Their Kids to Hate,” Jewish Daily Forward, May 8, 2014.
 See for example Zeev Sternhell, The Founding Myths of Israel (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998); John B. Judis, Genesis: Truman, American Jews, and the Origins of the Arab/Israeli Conflict (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2014); Gordon Thomas, Gideon’s Spies: The Secret History of the Mossad (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1999); Michael Bar-Zohar and Nissim Mishal, Mossad: The Greatest Missions of the Israeli Secret Service (New York: HarperCollins, 2012).
 Quoted in “From Orthodox Jewish Education to Hebron; Scripture Distorted,” NY Times, March 9, 1994.
 Ben Cohen, “Another Anti-Semitic Outrage on the Dark Continent,” Commentary, May 26, 2014.
 Quoted in Andrew Higgins, “3 Shot Dead at Brussels Jewish Museum,” NY Times, May 24, 2014.
 “Israeli Nuclear Expert: Netanyahu Using Iran Threat for Political Gain,” Haaretz, May 8, 2014.
 “Robert Tait, “Brussels shooting: Benjamin Netanyahu condemns weak European response to Jewish centre attack,” The Telegraph, May 25, 2014.
 See for example “France Arrest Syria Jihad Suspects as Nemmouche Held,” BBC, June 2, 2014.
 “French Jihadist Arrested in Shooting at Jewish Museum in Brussels That Killed 3,” NY Daily News, June 1, 2014; Joseph Strich, “French Police Arrest Suspect in Brussels Jewish Museum Shooting,” Jerusalem Post, January 1, 2014.
 Ingrid Melander and Adrian Croft, “Jewish Museum Shooting Arrest: Were Seed for Brussels Attack Sown in Syria?,” Christian Science Monitor, June 1, 2014.
 Quoted in Joseph Strich, “French Police Arrest Suspect in Brussels Jewish Museum Shooting,” Jerusalem Post, January 1, 2014.
  Ruth Sherlock, “Leading Libyan Islamist Met Free Syrian Army Opposition Group,” The Telegraph, November 27, 2011.
 “U.s. Recognizes Opposition as Representative of Syria,” Jerusalem Post, December 12, 2012.
 Paul Schemm, “U.S. and Syrian Opposition Disagree at Conference Over Labeling Islamist Rebel Group Terrorist,” Associated Press, December 12, 2012.
 John R. Bolton, Syria Is a SideShow,” NY Post, May 5, 2014.
 Ian Black, “US and Britain to Boost Support to Syrian Rebels, Says Kerry,” Guardian, May 15, 2014.
 Mark Lander and Michael R. Gordon, “Obama Says U.S. Will Recognize Syrian Rebels,” NY Times, December 11, 2012; Nour Malas and Jay Solomon, “U.S. Formally Recognizes Syria’s Main Rebel Group,” Wall Street Journal, December 12, 2012.
 Ben Hubbard, “Islamist Rebels Create Dilemma on Syria Policy,” NY Times, April 27, 2013.
 Kim Sengupta, “UK Military in Talks to Help Syria Rebels,” The Independent, December 11, 2012.
 Thom Shanker and Michael R. Gordon, “United States to Deploy Anti-Missile Units in Turkey,” NY Times, December 14, 2012.
 Michael R. Gordon, “NATO Backs Defense Plan for Turkey,” NY Times, December 4, 2012.
 “EU: All Options Are on the Table to Support Syrian Opposition,” Haaretz, December 14, 2012.
 “U.S. Recognizes Opposition as Representative of Syria,” Jerusalem Post, December 12, 2012.
 Kelly Mcevers and Rima Marrough, “Syrian Rebels Training on Anti-Aircraft Weapons in Jordan,” http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way/2012/12/12/167055437/sources-u-s-jordan-training-syrian-rebels-on-anti-aircraft-weapons.
 Seymour M. Hersh, “Our Men in Iran?,” New Yorker, April 6, 2012.
 Muhammad Sahimi, “Don’t Remove the MEK from the Terrorist List,” Antiwar.com, July 6, 2011.
 Michael R. Gordon and Elizabeth Bumiller, “U.S. Military Is Sent to Jordan to Help with Crisis in Syria,” NY Times, October 9, 2012.
 Edmund Sanders, “Ex-Mossad Chief Sees Opportunity in Syrian Crisis,” Jerusalem Post, February 22, 2012; Daniel Halper, “Using Syria to Get to Iran,” Weekly Standard, March 7, 2012.
 See Vincent Bugliosi, The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder (Perseus Books, 2008).
 David Bromwich, “After 9/11: The Stories We Tell and the Stories We Don’t,” Huffington Post, May 15, 2014.
 John Mueller and Mark G. Stewart, Terror, Security and Money: Balancing the Risks, Benefits, and Costs of Homeland Security (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011), 74.
 Fareed Zakaria, “End the War on Terror and Save Billions,” Washington Post, December 7, 2012.
 “Assad’s Overthrow ‘Red Line’ for Iran: Supreme Leader’s Aide,” http://ca.reuters.com/article/topNews/idCABRE90J08320130120?sp=true.
 Flynt Leverett and Hillary Mann Leverett, Going to Tehran: Why the United States Must Come to Terms with the Islamic Republic (New York: Henry Holt and Company, 2013), 10.
 Ibid., 16-17.
 Seumas Milne, “The West and Its Allies Cynically Bleed Syria to Weaken Iran,” Guardian, May 9, 2013.
 Olga Khazan, “What We Know About the Israeli Air Strike in Syria,” Washington Post, January 30, 2013; “Israeli Officials Warns that Transfer of Chemical Weapons to Hezbollah Might Trigger Attack,” Washington Post, January 27, 2013; Ian Deitch, “Israel Syria Strike: Chemical Weapons Transfer Could Bring Israeli Military Attack, Official Warns,” Huffington Post, January 27, 2013; Isabel Kershner and Michael Gordon, “Israeli Airstrike in Syria Targets Arms Convoy, U.S. Says,” NY Times, January 31, 2013; Farnaz Fassihi, Julian E. Barnes, and Sam Dagher, “Israeli Jets Blast Arms Shipment Inside Syria,” Wall Street Journal, January 30, 2013; Anne Barnard and Jodi Rudoren, “Syria Says It Has Right to Counterattack Israel,” NY Times, January 31, 2013.
 Paul R. Pillar, “Adding Flame to the Syrian Fire,” National Interest, January 30, 2013.
 “Israel Target Multiple Targets in Recent Attack on Syria, U.S. Intelligence Official Tells Time,” Haaretz, February 2, 2013.
 Yaakov Lappin, “Yadlin: Israel’s Threat to Strike Iran ‘Unhelpful,’” Jerusalem Post, January 2, 2013.
 E. Michael Jones, “Crimea River: The Hypocrisy of U.S. Foreign Policy,” Culture Wars, April 2014.
 See Michael Bar-Zohar and Nissim Mishal, Mossad: The Greatest Missions of the Israeli Secret Service (New York: HarperCollins, 2012), chapter 8.
 See historical studies on this issue, see for example Albert Fried, The Rise and Fall of the Jewish Gangster in America (New York: Columbia University Press, 1993); Jenna Weissman Joselit, Our Gang: Jewish Crime and the New York Jewish Community, 1900-1940 (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1983); Stephen Birmingham, The Rest of Us: The Rise of America’s Eastern European Jews (New York: Syracuse University Press, 1999); David Pietrusza, Rothstein: The Life, Times, and Murder of the Criminal Genius Who Fixed the 1919 World Series (New York: Basic Books, 2011); Robert A. Rockaway, But He Was Good to His Mother: The Lives and Crimes of Jewish Gangsters (Jerusalem and New York: Gefen Publishing House, 2000).
 Bar-Zohar and Mishal, Mossad, chapter 8.
 Ibid., 119.
 Jones, “Crimea River: The Hypocrisy of U.S. Foreign Policy.”
Jonas E. Alexis has degrees in mathematics and philosophy. He studied education at the graduate level. His main interests include U.S. foreign policy, history of Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the new book Zionism vs. the West: How Talmudic Ideology is Undermining Western Culture. He teaches mathematics in South Korea.