…by Jonas E. Alexis
Seymour M. Hersh has done it again. He certainly did not help the New World Order when he wrote a long article in the London Review of Books earlier saying that the Obama administration, including the C.I.A., knew very well that they were arming ISIS in Syria.
That’s not all. Hersh moved on to say that the administration knew perfectly well that if Assad is removed from power, then terrorism will roam in the rigion like vampires ready to strike. Hersh quotes one individual who said that the administration “did not want to hear the truth.”
Well, that is one of the central tenets of the New World Order. Its agents are ready to move heaven and earth in order to bring about their diabolical plan. What if it costs them trillions upon trillions of dollars? What if millions of precious people end up losing their lives?
It’s a small price to pay. For the New World Order and its agents, a diabolical plan is more rational than anything else. As John J. Mearsheimer and John M. Schuessler have pointed out, lying and sophisticated deception are already acceptable doctrines in international politics. Leaders will lie to perpetuate wars and conflict.
There is more. Hersh did not hesitate to write that supporting the so-called Syrian rebels “was bleak: there was no viable ‘moderate’ opposition to Assad, and the US was arming extremists.”
Well, Mr. Hersh, welcome to Veterans Today. We have been saying since the past three years that Washington, the Israeli regime, and ISIS, are birds of the same feather and they usually flock together. Now you have Turkey joining the crew.
“The military’s resistance dates back to the summer of 2013, when a highly classified assessment, put together by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, then led by General Martin Dempsey, forecast that the fall of the Assad regime would lead to chaos and, potentially, to Syria’s takeover by jihadi extremists, much as was then happening in Libya.”
Hersh’s article is a breakthrough only for people who have been bamboozled by the Zionist media and the Neoconservative ideology, which perpetuated the colossal lie throughout 2013 and much of 2014 that Vladimir Putin was “the new Hitler” and that Assad was a dictator who wanted to exterminate his own people.
Since the New World Order is based on a colossal lie, its agents could never answer the central question: Why did almost 88 percent of the Syrian people want Assad and not so-called the Syrian rebels? Are the Syrian people stupid? They could not recognize that their own government was literally slaughtering them by the thousands?
Or is it possible that the Zionist media and its agents lie again about Assad and the situation in Syria?
You be the judge. Veterans Today has already published a plethora of articles showing that the Zionist media lied about Assad using chemical weapons. They lied about so-called free Syrian army. And it should not be a surprise at all if they continue to lie about the situation on the ground.
It has been reported that the Pentagon is now “drafting [a] ‘new narrative’ for the war against ISIS.” Whenever the Pentagon publishes things like that, you can safely say that they are drafting a new lie for the war against ISIS.
Hersh declares that “Assad had approached Israel via a contact in Moscow and offered to reopen the talks on the Golan Heights. The Israelis had rejected the offer.”
In other words, the Israeli regime wanted Assad to go and therefore any peaceful dialogue was out of the question. In fact, Israeli officials have made it clear that they “prefer al-Qaeda-run Syria to an Assad victory.”
My problem with Hersh is that he could not bring himself to the fact that the Israeli regime has been supporting terrorist cells (including al-Qaeda and by deduction ISIS) since the beginning of time. Will it take him another two years to point out this fact?
We’ll just have to wait and see.
The central point in all this is that the New World Order and its agents continue to show that their moral and political feet are firmly planted in mid-air. They have to rely on fabrications, colossal lies, and blatant hypocrisy to thrive and survive. How else would they perpetuate one war after another without any remorse? How else would Jewish Neocon Jonah Goldberg say things like the war in Iraq was “a worthy mistake”?
What we are witnessing here is the death knell of the New World Order in the political and intellectual landscape. Its advocates repeatedly blamed Putin for allegedly killing and slaughtering civilians in Syria indiscriminately (a bold lie), but nearly all of the GOP presidential candidates advocate the killing of civilians:
“Donald Trump has called on killing families of terrorist suspects. Ted Cruz has called on “carpet bombing” Syrian cities controlled by IS and see if ‘sand can glow in the dark.’
“When moderator Hugh Hewitt asked Ben Carson, ‘So you are OK with the deaths of thousands of innocent children and civilians?’ he responded, ‘You got it. You got it.’
“Governor Jeb Bush, a supposedly moderate voice in the debate, underscored Republican hostility to international humanitarian law in his criticism of the Obama administration’s failure to take more aggressive action in civilian-populated areas, saying they should ‘get the lawyers off the backs of the fighting forces.’
“Although more liberal commentators have expressed appropriate outrage at such remarks, they have failed to note that, for a number of years now, prominent Democrats have also been advocating these very dangerous ideas as well, with Democratic leaders also defending the large-scale killing of civilians in the name of ‘fighting terrorism.’”
Now, think for a moment. Suppose Putin didn’t step up throughout 2015. Suppose he didn’t upset the New World Order and its agents. Can you imagine Assad staying in power in December 2015? Can you imagine Assad protecting the minority of Christians in the region? Can you imagine Assad going to church and saying hello?
I sure cannot. Syria would have looked like Libya when Gaddafi left.
We do not worship Vladimir Putin, as some has promiscuously and unconvincingly argued. But if he is upsetting the New World Order, what are we to do? Alienate people of good will? Is that what we should be doing?
Granted, Putin may not be who he is. But if he is putting his words into actions, if he keeps bringing morality and practical reason to the political table, can we tell him to be quiet and simply brush him aside? What are we looking for? A sinless and immortal political leader?
More recently, Sputnik News has reported that “Russia’s military capabilities displayed during the military operation against Daesh in Syria ‘were a shock to the US…’” The Daily Beast has said something similar, though they put a little spin on it.
What are we supposed to do? Tell Putin to stop upsetting the apple card? You may disagree with the man on many other issues, but the fact that he is putting “the fear of God” in the New World Order is a good thing. Many people are beginning to be upset about what’s going on in America and the Middle East as well. This again is a great thing.
 Seymour M. Hersh, “Military to Military,” London Review of Books, January 2016, Vol. 38, NO 1.
 John J. Mearsheimer, Why Leaders Lie: The Truth About Lying in International Politics (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011); John M. Schuessler, Deceit on the Road to War: Presidents, Politics, and American Democracy (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 2015).
 I have been debating some of these issues with a very good friend of mine but he never listened to the evidence. I was really surprised today. I sent him a copy of Hersh’s article to get his response. He quickly replied: “Holy crap…I’ll be damned.” To which I responded: “Now, you understand my frustration. My friend, this has been my whole argument since the past two years!”
 Hersh, “Military to Military,” London Review of Books, January 2016, Vol. 38, NO 1.
 Bashar al-Assad wins re-election in Syria as uprising against him rages on,” Guardian, June 4, 2014; “Bashar Assad wins Syria presidential election with 88.7% of vote,” Russia Today, June 4, 2014.
 Kristina Wong, “US military drafting ‘new narrative’ for ISIS war,” The Hill, December 27, 2015.
 Hersh, “Military to Military,” London Review of Books, January 2016, Vol. 38, NO 1.
 “Saving their sworn enemy: Heartstopping footage shows Israeli commandos rescuing wounded men from Syrian warzone – but WHY are they risking their lives for Islamic militants?,” Daily Mail, December 8, 2015; Johnlee Varghese, “UN Report: Israel in Regular Contact with Syrian Rebels including ISIS,” International Business Times, December 7, 2014.
 Jonah Goldberg, “Iraq Was a Worthy Mistake,” LA Times, October 19, 2006.
 Stephen Zunes, “Republican Candidates Defend Killing Civilians to Fight Terrorism—and So Do Democrats,” Foreign Policy in Focus, December 23, 2015.
 “Game Changer: Russia’s Actions Drastically Changed Situation in Syria,” Sputnik News, December 25, 2015.
 David Axe, “U.S. Fears Grow of a ‘Newly Awakened’ Russian Navy,” Daily Beast, December 28, 2015.
 In January, we will address this issue more fully in an article entitled, “Vladimir Putin and the Metaphysics of the New World Order.”
Jonas E. Alexis has degrees in mathematics and philosophy. He studied education at the graduate level. His main interests include U.S. foreign policy, the history of the Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the new book Zionism vs. the West: How Talmudic Ideology is Undermining Western Culture. He teaches mathematics in South Korea.