David Irving - Winston Churchill - Adolf Hitler



By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor

Editor’s note:  We apologize as we learn that David Irving, even when discussing Winston Churchill, is under ban in Germany.

Was it Osama bin Laden or the Mossad?  Was it the Illuminati or the Council on Foreign Relations?  Did they do it together?  Where was Marc Anthony after 9/11 when we really needed him?  A sad thing, perhaps beyond comprehension, is that we know more about Julius Caesar than we know about or own recent history.  A few days ago someone sent me a link to a video by David Irving, the British author who professionally debunks everything.

Irving, famous of late for taking on the holocaust, is the “go to guy” on World War II and Germany in particular.  His research is, hands down, the best out there and he loves humiliating others for being duped by writing academic garbage based on secondary sources, too often proven, not just unreliable, but utter fiction.

Irving takes on a lot of targets but his best debunking is Winston Churchill.  Sitting through his book tour lecture from the 1980s, a grainy video, was surprisingly painless.  With the rise of cable television, the new networks have made a cottage industry out of debunking our phony history, shows on military secrets, scandals and cover-ups run for hours each day.  These are humiliating for historians who made their reputations writing “definitive” works based on what we now know to be forgeries, propaganda and disinformation. (optional full length Google Video below)

[youtube qKuXW2fLkz4]

Irving’s case against Churchill is shocking and, worst of all, nobody has been able to debate him face to face.  His sources are impeccable and his research beyond anything yet seen.  This is a guy who will spend years reading letters, bank statements or travel around the world to get primary documents.  Irving paints Churchill as a villain as great as Hitler, nearly as great as Stalin.  Was World War II started by Churchill, a brilliant but immoral drunk, art forger and scoundrel who took payoffs from foreign intelligence services, banking cabals and anyone else willing to shove an envelope in his pocket?

If so, then everything we know of World War II, of Hitler, of events of the 20th century is, not just a little bit wrong, but outrageously false.

[youtube FOe1RYBdtAI&feature=related]

Most damning, to me at least, is learning that Churchill’s History of the Second World War was largely fabricated, ghost written by his American editors who made sure the truth never got out.  Though Irving finds Churchill an easy target, it goes much further.  Embarrassingly, the Goebbel’s wartime attacks on Churchill were far more fact and far less propaganda than our “history” teaches.  A nasty thought, “What if Goebbels” was simply telling the truth?”

If the truth seems like outrageous propaganda, what have we allowed to happen to us?  How can there be honest discussion on any subject, politics, religion or where to get decent Chinese food if all research is either “secondary source recycling” or, even worse, simply invented as we are now beginning to learn.

Irving questions the nature of the holocaust, the gas chambers, the “soap and lampshade” stories  and has made some major enemies in the process.  What is particularly dangerous is his detailed analysis of Adolf Hitler as a masterful military strategist and pragmatic political leader.  The immediate response is to stand up screaming, “What the hell is he talking about?”

[youtube qqWLx8hSov4&feature=related]

I can think of dozens of instances that absolutely prove Hitler was an incompetent, insane, brutal and…

Come to think of it, if I go on the internet, I can prove anything.  I can even prove Hitler was Jewish.  The accepted realities, our history as written in books, the history that defined Hitler, Irving implies, was as much history as today’s network news is, well, “fair and balanced.”  What if every “fact” we use to refute Irving’s ideas came from Stalin?

We know so much of what happened.  I am reading the battle diaries from D-Day.  I know there were landings, I know men died, but we don’t know why, only what we were told.

[youtube 7tpETw7uAUw]

Everything we believe is based on one known fact, that Germans are brutal and insane, a race of criminals, vicious monsters with an inbred need to destroy.  40% of Americans are of German ancestry, of course.  It doesn’t take much research to learn that, in the 19th century, Germany became, not only powerful but the most advanced society on earth, science, philosophy, the arts, public welfare and education, Germany entered the 20th century as the leader of the world.  German colonial policies, when compared to Britain, France, Spain, the Netherlands and Portugal, were typified by decency and humanitarian values.  German citizens had more human rights, by a mile, than their British counterparts.

A century later, Germany is a virtual mirror of mainstream “Midwest” America.  Though politically castrated, Germany is what Americans wish their country was, in many ways at least.  Germany has almost no military, almost no debt and relative freedom with one glaring exception.  German’s have taken “political correctness” to a point that no American could imagine.  Things heard on American television daily are crimes in Germany.

[youtube asggheqfoBM&feature=related]

If we aren’t willing to take the leap of faith that history demands, that Germans are monsters, then we are faced with something else.  If Germans are who we know them to be, then we are a nation of liars and cowards, fools willing to follow any road, eat anything put on a plate in front of us.  America could, very possibly, be a country scammed into war in Vietnam or Iraq or Afghanistan or, just maybe, into two wars with Germany.  But again we leap to our feet, and scream.  Many Americans are willing to consider that World War I was a “Vietnam” experience, phony atrocities and manipulation by a vast international conspiracy.  That information has been “out there” for awhile and more and more are willing to consider it.

[youtube gzLeoTeOU0I&feature=related]

However, the “sacred cow” of all time has been World War II.  We aren’t talking Japan.  No question, they attacked the United States.  Germany, on the other hand, was that something else?  We got used to lying to ourselves about the Civil War.  Ask any American, we went to war to free the slaves.  Problem is, the North only freed the slaves years later, when they were losing the war and only slaves in the South.  The Civil War was over economics and bad government, “States Rights,” not slavery.

How different is the truth about World War II?  Should we have never gone to war with Germany and let them destroy Russia?  How many Americans know that Hitler was willing to end the war in 1940 and withdraw his troops?  How many Americans know that World War I could have ended in 1916 with an honorable peace but was pushed on by Balfour and Rothschild?  Oh, you never heard that?

World War II would never have happened, there would have never been communism, no Korea, no Vietnam, no Cold War, no potential for nuclear holocaust.  Whose game are we playing then?

[youtube sbobokzG-oE&feature=related]

[youtube tHX6pY5pSu8&feature=related]

[youtube aoCKu2t82GE&feature=related]

[youtube AI8yd11suaQ&feature=related]

[google 7277751690450162669#]

Books By David Irving

The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

Posted by on November 2, 2010, With Reads Filed under WarZone. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.


  1. Bill  November 9, 2010 at 7:21 pm

    If our leaders and historians told the truth, there would be no need for “revisionist” history.
    The winner writes the history books!

  2. Mike  November 9, 2010 at 11:48 am

    Thanks for an important article! It’s hard to admit when you’re wrong. However, it must be done if you’re going to make improvements and advance towards the truth and reality. As General Patton said shortly after WWII, we were on the wrong side. We should have been fighting with Germany against the Communists of the USSR. However, just as Jewish powers and influence have pushed us to war in Iraq and Afghanistan and are now working on having the US start a war against Iran, so they also pushed us into war with Germany. It’s also interesting to note that FDR knew about Pearl Harbor prior to the attack. That was his backdoor way of getting us to fight Germany. Infamy by John Toland does a great job of documenting this fact.

    Keep up the important and great work! Semper Fi!

  3. Equalizer  November 6, 2010 at 10:28 pm

    Gordon, this truly shows how little we know to be true. How fortunate I am to have, at least, one of Mr. Irving’s books from my Dad’s library. Mr. Irving’s website is facinating, his letters from prison worth a look; and, the grim reminder of fellow truth-seekers now incarcerated, sobering.

  4. Vee  November 6, 2010 at 5:55 pm

    Who the hell is this jim guy? He dont show no respect for what our guys done for this country.

    • Gordon Duff  November 6, 2010 at 7:47 pm

      This guy is a total piece of shit.

    • Gordon Duff  November 6, 2010 at 8:02 pm

      We are going to be selling Irvings books. I think he should ge a Medal of Freedom.

    • Gordon Duff  November 7, 2010 at 12:07 am

      We are putting Irving up for the Ben Gurion award also.

    • Gordon Duff  November 7, 2010 at 12:58 am

      Thus far we are opposing a Hitler statue at Ground Zero.

  5. Peter  November 5, 2010 at 11:11 pm

    Who defines the qualities that makes someone an anti-semite? Do you think the surviving relatives of the 1,400 massacred Palestinians in the Gaza strip two years ago are anti-semitic yet? If they’re not, how much more do you think it will take to make them anti-semitic? By the way, is anti-semitism worse than racial hatred of blacks? How about hatred of Japanese or Germans? Are there some forms of bigotry that are more acceptable than others? The Anti-Defamation league would certainly say yes to that question. They call David Irving an anti-semite because he has written about some uncomfortable truths that other “politically correct” historians won’t write about.

    He says he is not a holocaust denier and actually went to court to sue one of his main accusers. He lost the case, but if everyone was defined by labels tagged on them by their detractors we would all have negative labels attached to us.

    When Mel Gibson made his movie “The Passion of the Christ” in 2004 he was attacked mercilessly. The NY Times and other media sources (with big Jewish influence) attacked him to try to force him to change the movie. He didn’t back down and they ratcheted up their attack. He finally blew up and said something negative about Jews.

    A few weeks ago the the host of a TV program Rick Sanchez was fired when he called the Jewish comedian Jon Stewart a bigot. Just google it. So to sum this up, when a gentile calls a Jew a bigot the gentile gets fired and when a Jew calls a gentile an anti-semite, the gentile still gets fired. So, who do think runs things here.

    These are just two examples. There are many other examples of people being fired because the ADL or some other Jews are offended. Even Jews are maligned if they don’t walk the line. Professor Norman Finkelstein (Jewish himself) is continuously attacked for criticizing Israel and he’s been called anti-semitic.

    • Equalizer  November 6, 2010 at 10:46 pm

      Peter, ashkenazi jews are NOT semetic. Palestinians ARE semetic. So, if the surviving relatives of the massacred Palestinians are anti-semetic, they would not like themselves. Get it?

      The ADL uses the label to smear individuals; but the accusation is nonsensical, ludicrous.

      Educating people about this one simple LIE may be the best ammunition truth-tellers can muster.

      Also, Norman Finkelstein is BANNED from entering Israel.

      Those who live in DARKNESS, FEAR THE LIGHT (TRUTH)

  6. David  November 5, 2010 at 8:51 pm

    The Royal Canadian Legion—that great outfit that remembers the soldiers who fought for freedom—actually opposes freedom when it cuts into their profits.


  7. Gordon Duff  November 5, 2010 at 6:20 pm


    • Michael J Volz  November 5, 2010 at 10:20 pm

      Jim (the shill?) who said Irving will wind up dead like Kelly.


  8. eddy  November 4, 2010 at 11:07 pm

    this site works if you want to save the video:


  9. Craig Pepe  November 4, 2010 at 9:13 pm

    hey MIke

    kids, listen up when Mike j volz speaks

    you will learn things

  10. Craig Pepe  November 4, 2010 at 6:47 pm

    still doing scare tactics eh

    just to remind you

    its NOvember

    its autumn

    its 2010


    what else is going on the world right now

  11. Gipsy Kong  November 4, 2010 at 11:12 am

    He was less like a Churchill and more like a Boot Hill.

  12. American Muslim  November 4, 2010 at 10:17 am

    Robert Faurisson is also worth studying.

  13. The Populist  November 4, 2010 at 9:45 am

    I just discovered David Irving this summer. A few months earlier I had researched “holocaust revisionism”. This will be the next scandal to go viral. The holocaust was a lie.

    • Michael J Volz  November 5, 2010 at 3:47 pm

      It’s been out there on the net for a long time. Irving does USA lecture tours (when not in jail on thought control charges)every year in the USA, and of course the DEFAMATION LEAGUE chases him down and tries to get the hotel to reject his reservations at the last minute.


    • Equalizer  November 7, 2010 at 1:33 am

      I’ve got a guest room for Mr. Irving, any time.

  14. hareli  November 4, 2010 at 2:58 am

    EXCELLENT video. Every parent needs to show this to his or her high school kid to help the kid understand how information and books work, not to promote a point-of-view, but to help the kid see that knowledge is like an onion you have to peel off one layer at a time.

    I’m supposedly highly educated, but I have learned more in the years since the net was available than all my years of expensive schooling. We were taught by someone standing in front of a room and telling us ‘learn this, you must know this content in order to pass’. (This gave us groupthink, as well.) The kids today learn by searching, and it is that ability which determines the content they get.

    A video like David Irving’s speech could impress upon a kid not to denigrate certain sources….a valuable tool in their arsenal of learning. [Should also impress upon them to learn to spell and learn other languages.]

  15. john  November 4, 2010 at 1:23 am

    You all too nuts for me man! Good bye and good riddens!

    • Michael J Volz  November 5, 2010 at 3:49 pm

      Back to Israel? Or are you in Hertzeliya (mossad HQ) now ? You’ll keep reading.


  16. Tom Dillman  November 4, 2010 at 1:06 am

    Quite enjoyable, G. And based on me being a few months older than you, right on track for my impeccable memory. Or whatever that memory is….. I forget.


You must be logged in to post a comment Login

From Veterans Today Network