Dimitri Khalezov talks about nuclear terrorism, 9/11 and who is responsible for terror attacks that have killed thousands of Americans.

By Gordon Duff STAFF WRITER/Senior Editor

What if someone could prove that the terrorist bombs, Oklahoma City, Beirut Marine Barracks, the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia, the Bali attacks and more, many more weren’t car and truck bombs at all, not the kind we were told, what then?  Buildings thrown into the air like toys, mushroom clouds rise a dozen miles, explosions larger than anything known previously, many times larger than the biggest bomb, even larger than exploding munition ships from World War 2.  These have happened over and over, been misreported in our news, nuclear attacks, new precision weapons that emulate conventional explosives.

[youtube 4aGY5oWffas]

Khalezov says that when we hear truck or car bombs, sometimes something else is going on, something sinister.  One case in particular stands out, the murder of over 200 US Marines in Lebanon in 1983.  Americans are told that a truck bomb blew up a four story building, heavily reinforced, killing everyone in and near it.  The explosion could be seen in Israel and felt in Cyprus.  We are told this was the largest non-nuclear explosion in history:

The suicide bomber detonated his explosives, which were equivalent to 12,000 pounds (about 5,400 kg) of TNT. The force of the explosion collapsed the four-story cinder-block building into rubble, crushing many inside.It is said  to have been the largest non-nuclear blast ever (deliberately) detonated on the face of the earth. “The force of the explosion,” “initially lifted the entire four-story structure, shearing the bases of the concrete support columns, each measuring fifteen feet in circumference and reinforced by numerous one and three quarter inch steel rods. The airborne building then fell in upon itself. A massive shock wave and ball of flaming gas was hurled in all directions.”

About 20 seconds later, an identical attack occurred against the barracks of the French 3rd Company of the 6th French Parachute Infantry Regiment. Another suicide bomber drove his truck down a ramp into the building’s underground parking garage and detonated his bomb, leveling the headquarters.

The claim is that the explosives in the truck were equal to 6 tons of TNT and made the largest explosion known to man, even larger than the blast made when, in 1944, the munitions ship, USS Mt. Hood exploded.  However, the Hood was loaded with 4000 tons or as we call it now, 4 “kilotons” of explosives.  Beirut was bigger, much bigger, not 6 tons, not even 4000 tons but 10,000 tons.  The Marine and French barracks in Lebanon were destroyed by two variable yield nuclear weapons, each set to 10 kilotons, roughly half the size of the nuclear weapon that destroyed Hiroshima.


Until 1992, Dimitri Khalezov was a Soviet military specialist.  His job?  He tracked the use of nuclear weapons around the world, not just from known nuclear states and not just the bombs we all fear will rain Armageddon on us and our


children by other nuclear weapons as well.  Dimitri Khalezov says that nuclear weapons and been used many times, “micro-nukes” and he can prove it.  Khalezov says that small nuclear weapons, known as “dial a nukes” with selected output of as low as 10 tons of TNT and up to 100,000 tons are commonly used for car and truck bombs.

We talked about this today.  I was skeptical.  Then he sent me something that hit me between the eyes.  I was asking him if he knew about the January 24, 2010 “suicide bombing” in Moscow that killed 35 and injured over 100.  He sent me an article from CNN, something I had never seen and something that, if read carefully will take your breath away.


The BBC said it “sounds like a car bomb.”  They also quoted it as being described as an “almighty explosion.”  This was how the explosions two weeks ago were described in Moscow, but this wasn’t the first time.

We have seen these bombs before, damage on a massive scale, and were told it was fertilizer in the trunk of a car set off by a mobile phone.  Then I read the statement carried in the CNN article, one I have been told has been suppressed.  This was another similar bomb, a truck bomb used to attack a Moscow apartment complex.  The year was 1999.

This time, the truth got out, for a while at least, picked up by CNN but quickly suppressed.  This is what the authorities in Russia said:

“The force of the blast was equivalent to about 100-300 tons of TNT, it said.”

The link to the CNN video has been disabled, but we have the description as given to CNN by Russian officials:

“At least 17 people were killed and more than 115 injured when explosives hidden in a truck or an underground pipe blew off the front of a nine-story apartment block in Volgodonsk, about 800 kilometers (500 miles) south of Moscow, Russian security officials said.”

A truck can carry 2 or 3 tons of the explosives described, no more, certainly not 100 tons or 300 tons.  However a rail car holds 60 tons of fertilizer, a common way of transporting this material.  The problem is, there are no railroad tracks in the area and no one saw a train explode.

This explosion could have been nothing but a nuke.  Figure a ton of TNT is roughly the size of a Russian car.  Did someone miss 100 cars?  300 cars?  A small train, no tracks mind you, just a train driving down the road?



In 1996, a United States Air Force housing complex was destroyed by a “truck bomb” in an attack almost identical to Oklahoma City.  20 were killed, 19 Americans and 372 were injured.  The explosion was, as with Beirut, the “largest conventional explosion known to man.”

Not all large truck bombs have used ANFO. On June 25, 1996, Saudi terrorists sponsored by Iran attacked the Khobar Towers barracks, a high-rise building complex in a densely populated urban environment in Saudi Arabia. T tanker truck loaded with at least 5,000 pounds of plastic explosives was driven into the parking lot in front of the Khobar Towers residential complex in Dhahran. Nineteen American service members were killed in the blast, and hundreds of other service members and Saudis were injured. There is no doubt that the extent of the casualties at Khobar Towers resulted, in part, from the extraordinary size of the terrorist bomb. Reports initially estimated that the bomb contained the equivalent of 3,000 to 8,000 pounds of TNT, but a study by the Defense Special Weapons Agency concluded that the power of the bomb was actually closer to 20,000 pounds of TNT.(100 tons)


  We can talk all day about imaginary explosives that can equal a hundred tons of TNT.  We can talk ten trucks or twenty but we had one hole and a blast radius of such power and acceleration that, again, no conventional explosive could come close.  The story is almost a perfect match for Oklahoma City.



  1. What do you mean by his motive? Mike Harari was the head of the Mossad.Who is he supposed to finger,Lindsey Lohan? I guess hes just another evil anti-Semite.Zionists….lol. Are you a jew,Jim?

  2. What’s Mr. Khalezov’s motive here? Why does he finger the Mossad? Don’t forget that the Soviets and Zionists were thick as thieves – think of Pollard. The Russians and Israelis are still crime partners of the Red Mafiya.

  3. One nuclear device in the basement would not do that in my opinion. But thermite cutting charges on the outer colums with a string of micro-nukes, timed to go off in succession, running down the core colums, could achieve the desired result in tandum with the thermite cutting charges.

    Bollyn’s response in toto on why nukes aren’t involved (one device in the basement):

    “I do not agree that the pulverization of the concrete was done by a nuclear device. The evidence indicates that a very large amount of highly explosive nano-composite thermite was used to demolish the Twin Towers. In my opinion, the nano-thermite had probably been applied as a spray coating to the floor pans and is what caused the pulverization of the 220 concrete floors and their floors pans. The evidence indicates that the floors were exploded from the top down – one-by-one at the speed of a falling object. How would a nuclear device do that?”

    That response does not answer all the anomalies that only the presence of micro-nukes can fully explain.

    Problem for Bollyn: Bathrooms were in the core, toilets & sinks are made out of porcelain, yet none were found, no broken pieces, not even chips, as I understand it. Thermite is more a cutting charge than an explosive charge, so, where did all the porelain fixtures disappear to? Also, massive amounts of steel, core columns, disappeared. Thermite is powerful, but it stretches the thermite “only” theory to its limit to assert that the core colums were vaporized into dust by thermite painted onto the floor pans as Bollyn asserts in his response.

    Also, Bollyn fails to explain the elevated levels of Strontiim & Barium observed & measured by the USGS at ground zero. As well as the Tritium Levels 55 times the normal environmental amount. Heat generation at ground zero for six months (china syndrome), inability to quench ground zero heat with water (thermite would not stay hot that long especially with it constantly being quenched with water, which ground zero was). Electro Magnetic Pulse (EMP) detected slightly before North tower hit by plane (remote live video news feed briefly electronically distorted at same time “boom” type noise is heard instant before plane is heard to hit building. EMP and electromagnetic plasma formation during tower destruction (exploding cars, partial burning). Melted, “hanging” skin in WTC survivor Felipe David in absence of fire. Vaporized press and crumpled steel door in WTC 1 basement reported by Pecoraro, just after basement explosion and plane impact at WTC 1. Small iron microspheres found by Jones et al in WTC dust— evidence of steel vaporization by high temps of nukes.

    Bollyn’s response is a throw away line, “pay no attention”, not a detained refutation of the micro-nuke theory, at best it only pertains to Khalezov’s hypothesis, not the string of micro-nukes running down the core colums. Bollyn in no way addresses all the facts & evidence, anomalies, supporting nuclear demolition.

  4. Gad sakes. Apologies, an’ I hope you will delete all those occidental multiple postings. Thanks ‘n best wishes, &c.

  5. The real victims families got real money I would guess, but they would be VERY few. All money paid should be traced and audited, including Larry’s insurance payout, he was a front. Larry should also be audited for where he got the money to buy the towers

  6. Thanks J.F.E for the reply, I agree. The bottom-line, as always, is that it was not the airplane, pancakes or any unshaven middle-eastern men (well.. you know what I mean) who brought down the tower, that we know for sure.

  7. “…The evidence indicates that THE FLOORS WERE EXPLODED FROM THE TOP DOWN [empasis mine -SC] – one-by-one at the speed of a falling object. How would a nuclear device do that?”
    – (Q & A)

  8. Hey, I know I’ve made a few mildly impertinent comments i’ th’ past — but Bollyn’s analysis of the proposition ‘seems to me’ to be highly apposite. What say?

  9. MR.RON PAUL AND MR.ROSS: you keep saying and asking the same things when your questions or rebuttals to your statements are included here in comments and Khalezov’s book (free download); your problem is psychological; my advice: read don’t drink! Again about this and other things: for top intel on the rat-cat black psy-ops by the mossad “master-race”talmudic mythomaniac kleptocrats in Tel-Aviv and their CIA”lube-boys”go to . For deep new knowledge on the historico-geographic farce-and-fraud by the transgenerational jewish crime syndicate-a mafia disguised as a religion- go to click top red line for satellite and ancient maps,go back to bottom of page for elaborate proofs and comments section and go to (false map at top and our maps’research bottom) and download QueenofShebaandIsrael pdf book by Dr.Bernard-Leeman and go to to October archive for english…

  10. General Leonid Ivashov,russian chief of staff on 9/11 was not fooled and he wrote extensively on this being an inside job and that the international “war on terror”is just a hoax setup by the narcopetrol military-genocidal ziocon plunder-murder complex to a nuclear attack on Iran the soft belly of the eurasian land mass and key to Caspian oil fields and to strangling China and Russia and keep full spectrum dominance as prescribed by Brzezinsky so as to proceed with Rothschild’s rat-brain-“master-race”-world- enslavment talmudic agenda and to his messianic rule with his “iron rod” . Please read him and others at (or google globalresearch+Ivashov and also at (click international for english,upper left )

  11. french zio networks invovled.,.. that’ss something we put in the net long time ago… and that explains the hate against me and the voice of the oppressed !

    France and North Africa is ruled by zionist jews ! nothing new here… these masonic networks done the job using these countries to start this ww4

  12. I confirm in 2008 israel threatened to destry the bourj al dubai if UAE were not cooperative in attacking Iran, that’s spure intel… so I assume there is micro nukes pre planted in Bourj al Dubai ? !

  13. I have 15 years experience in oncology in different type of cancers… I used to manipulate radioactivity in my lab to measure cell growth when testing new anti cancer drugs, we can measure radioactivity in groundd zera so I asssume courageouss and hoonest people did it ! We can compare the differents types of cancer the first helpers died of… and compare ti with what we know from previous nuclear explosions…

    I have been sent some links but nothing at this time that I can compare with cancers provked duee to radioactivity.

    Second point, how do you measure the exact amount of micro nukes needed to get these special effects… knowing the fact that for example here in Europe the CERN strated to work on atomic collision around 2007… if I am not wrong… so how do you predict the results we saw on nearly perfect controlled demolition… scientifically we can assume that micro nukes started the process underground, under basement and hypercontrated thermo-nanites were used to give thiss perfect FX style effect…

    at the ned of the day all the way leads to Israel but we shouldd never give Cass Sunstein win this one…

    If we have pre planted micro-nukes on secret and very important buildings all over the world, like the UN and the pentagone, the FBI building etc…, I understand that Israel want to transfer the UN to Jerusalem, after Israel blitzkrieg the middle east… so will israel wil ldestroy the UN and recreate one in Jerusalem ?

    Khalezov confirms what I’ve been saying, coming from deep sources, that France networks were invovled… since the very first day ! This explains why Chirac was on the 12th September in ground zero… as the israelis stried to kill him, but they killed after the best friend of Saddam Jean Luc Lagardere and then Rafik Hariri… israelis just wanted to grab occult financial networks created by the french empire under Chirac hands… which includes Turkey, Syria, Iraq, Lebanon and all north Africa from Mauritiania to Lybia !!!

    Sorry Gordon a lot fo question to ask as I could not do before, busy coolecting mushrooms were you know !

  14. Did you hear Kevin Barrett’s interview with Dimitri? He mentioned France’s involvement. That blew me away! Anyone have any thoughts on that?

  15. ‘no planes’ in not theory, it’s a fact. Where’s all the victims? They didn’t exist. Everyone here believes it was an inside job, but I don’t believe ‘insiders’ would agree to kill 3000 innocents, on TV!! The buildings were mostly evacuated. The identities and photos of victims were made up. That’s why the there was an FBI gag on first responders and firefighters. Read the form at septemberclues, IMHO Simon Shack hit the nail on the head.

  16. Gordon,I’m not disputing the existance of mico-nukes and small radiation signature.I have a problem with Dimitri and his theory of what actually happened.I think that is excellent that so many comments on this topic are skeptical like mine.We are more likely to reach the truth with minds of science and logic.

    This is analysis is in no way a reflection upon you integrity or ability.You have enormous volumes of data to sift through before publication and thus cannot possibly assess all the relevant info.

    Your dedication and aspirations for our humanity are much appreciated.

  17. From memory there was a few ships just off the coast of NY including 1 or 2 aircraft carriers and these were even photographed by the orbiting space station and also curiously the Russian Military. They also had their satellites trained on events in NY and pentagon for some reason… They got a first hand view of proceedings. As did the USS George Washington just off the coast of NY
    Looks like this link is now Broken But a cursory search of :

    “Russia Watched 9/11 In Real Time On Satellite By Jon Carlson”

    Produces this one with images intact:
    Thank goodness some smart people mirrored that original website.

  18. Mike,

    To cut straight threw I-Beam requires small amount of X-Material, which is specifically packaged for this purpose. This r-bbon ch-rge is about 1 lb. of X-Material and will cut through I-Beam. How do you connect r-bbon ch-rges? with d-cord, it looks like computer network cable, maybe a clue for you.

  19. Gordon,

    You really need to have your friend teach you something about compression. Something I won’t discuss here, but maybe your friend can explain to you.

  20. This is the best explanation that I have come across so far. From my analysis or judgement, I would like to advise people not to discredit somebody or call them crazy, simply because you don’t believe it to be so… The reason: we all have expertise in different and specific areas, e.g:
    1. No Planes Theory – Computer Graphics experts
    2. Mossad, CIA links – Sociology type of people
    3. Dimitri Khazelov – Nuclear Physicist with a army background and insider information

    Dimitri has made some very good points. Maths and physics were my favorite subjects and I did really well in my nuclear physics and mechanics. I would recommend everybody to study these topics. There are some issues that I need explanation from Dmitri:
    1. Switching planes or whatever happened, what happened to the people, this thought just terrified me… why would they on the very same day before they even pressed the buttons to nuke the building because apparently they learned from French that nuclear devices are on the impact zones would they pack the planes with a bunch of idiots who could not even pilot a C152 or a C172? Or was this implication being done by the Mossad?
    2. There were survivors from FDNY and civilians that were on emergency exit stairs, so why were they not effected by the 77ft underground thermal nuclear blast?
    3. If a missile capable of carrying a nuclear device landed in Pentagon, where was it launched from?

    I am going to have to read his book for more info and research paper on nano thermites. Could it be combination of both?? In that case no planers will win if nano thermite was used to blow holes to depict planes entry path but that still doesn’t explain eyewitness accounts, “it wasnt a US airlines”, “it had blue markings on side of plane” but then again there are also witnesses who saw a plane hit pentagon minus debris or any part from a commercial airliner. I trust the physical evidence…

    n.b: 10^3=kilo, 10^6=Mega 10^9=Giga, 10^-3=milli, 10^-6=micro, 10^-9=nano

  21. Interesting question(s).

    About 3-4 months ago I came across a mirror of Judicial Biz which contained EVERY webpage possible in an Open Directory format.
    I will see if I can track that link down for you.

    Looking into the Vialls missing page, it is most certainly still there. You needed to insert /myahudi/ sub-directory path to get the page showing:*/

    I do notice that the images on all these pages are also “blurred” as you noted and can only suggest that these were originally posted in 2004 with originals. When backed the site up it possibly blurred the images for reasons of legalities I cannot say for sure.

    Interestingly there is a 6 month discrepancy between when Wayback machine began backing up and when the page was first uploaded.

    Could have been donr by Joe himself after a warning from his hosters about ICAAN rules and regs.
    I am curious about what happened now and you have indeed sparked my interest. Joe was a good friend whom I invited onto paltalk chat more than once, and we both shared links on occasion. I will let you know what I find.


  22. What actually struck me about Khobar Towers crater is the apparent fusion of the sand at the bottom of the crater that, if true, could only have been produced by intense heat beyond anything resulting from normal explosives.

  23. Khalezov, Gordon, Dr. Nur, and the late Joe Vialls – RIGHT
    Skeptics – WRONG (Look, you haven’t been studying all this for more than a decade, and some of us have.)

  24. David, I appreciate your comment.

    The physical evidence Ms. Wood has recorded via photographs is valuble.

    But I suggest it is consistent with nuclear reaction effects and not some unknown and undescribed weapon.

    Ms. Wood has no mechanism (an schematic of a device) and no location this mechanism was aimed from to do in the towers.

    At best it’s a theoretical musing — with no substance to it. Wood implies, but doesn’t say, “HOW”, an offshore hurricane provided, or was a conduit for, the energy necessary for her idea. It’s fanciful at best and intentional disinformation at worst. Why would she do it? Simple, individuals were beginning to catalogue the effects, facts & evidence, i.e., pictures, physical samples, physical objects, and so on, supporting, and ONLY explained by, the nuclear demolution theory.

    If you reviewed William Tahil, B. A.’s Ground Zero: The Nuclear Demoltion of The World Trade Centre, you noted there were elevated levels of Strontium and Barium detected in multiple locations around ground zero. These elements are products of nuclear reaction and the concentrations and locations are, also, consistent with nuclear reaction as opposed to naturally occuring. This is strong, if not irrefutable, evidence of nuclear reactions at the WTC complex.

    How to discredit strong evidence? Wrap it in a ridiculous hypothesis, so average folks dismiss it. Ms. Wood’s DEW fits the bill perfectly.

    As to nukes under the WTC (150mt nukes!!LOL), sure there were, but
    they were micro Bali, Oklahoma, Taba, Jakarta Australian
    Embbasy and Jakarta Marriott, to mention just a few.

    In 1993, Joe Vialls exposes some facts about single explosions that
    were very similar to the 2001 WTC bombing. The article, “Micro Nukes
    in London,” notes the sudden usage of massive explosions in business
    districts by the IRA with a brief mention of the 1993 bombing of the
    WTC. In the supposed first mega-bombing by the ‘IRA’, an eyewitness
    stated, “The ground shook under our feet. There was a brilliant white
    flash and a tall vertical column of smoke.” Significant information
    about the Special Atomic Demolition Munition (SADM – the general class
    of the W54 warhead). While the government was working on the usage of
    a conventional bomb to the corporate media, there was accidental
    filming of investigators of the bombing in full radiation protective
    gear. Description of the crater created by the second explosion
    reveals a hole 60 feet wide and 40 feet deep. Quotes of physicists’
    Galen Winsor, John McPhee and Theodore Taylor are prophetic for the
    usage of micro nukes. Taylor specifically notes the future usage of an
    extremely small micro nuke being used in the WTC in the year 1973.

    Another crater 22 feet wide and 5 feet deep is noted in the article
    “Bali Micro Nuke – Lack of Radiation Confuses Experts.” Within 48
    hours the Bali government found traces of C4 explosive. Next came the
    revised explanation of explosives on top of gas containers. After that
    failed to explain noted facts, the next theory was explosives with
    napalm. The final explanation from London quoted a reliable source
    that an IRA style bomb mixture was used. Still, there were significant
    problems with the story as the IRA had detonated 1,000 pounds of the
    mixture and there was no crater produced. The US bomb, BLU-82 – used
    for clearing helicopter landing zones in the jungles of Vietnam,
    contains 6.3 Tons of high grade military explosive with an aluminum
    additive for increased heat does not create a crater. The 1/4 inch
    steel encased explosive is parachuted to its target and detonated 1 to
    2 feet above ground. Approximately 40 people close enough to be
    vaporized simply vanished without a trace. Insights on Israel’s .01 kt
    Dimona nuke are also related in this article. According to the
    information presented, the bomb uses highly enriched Plutonium 239,
    99.78% pure, and only emits alpha radiation which is invisible to most
    Geiger counters.


    Theodore Taylor would be a very respected and credible source. The Manhattan
    Project scientist I work with worked very closely with Taylor. Taylor just died
    a few years ago.

    I know they used mininukes at the WTC, because there was deuterium and tritium
    also contaminating the WTC in air monitoring studies for 5 months after it
    happened. Also, the scientist at UC Davis who voluntarily did the air
    monitoring (so the data is all his and I saw his report) was asked by a Dept. of
    Energy person to do the air monitoring but he was not allowed to start
    monitoring until Oct. 5 – long enough for the neutron activated radioactive
    products to lose most of their radioactivity (about 2-3 weeks) like physicists
    reported in Lebanon who monitored the bomb crater we have samples from.

    They also used HAARP or directed energy weapons on the WTC because those
    buildings went up into lower orbital space in 24 hours – that is unheard of, and
    they had to be nanoparticles that took an enormous amount of energy to finely
    divide buildings into nanoparticles. Chemical explosives could never do that.

  27. We can’t measure the efficiency of an explosion using conventional explosives… supercomputer would have been needed to measure and get the right amount of micro-nukes to get the special FX effect of control demolition but still though it can be possible that a combination of micro-nukes and hyperconcentrate thermonanite might have been used…

    we lack knowledge in both new technology that’s why it is still stongly debated in the web !

  28. he infamous battle of the Baghdad airport took place in the first week of April 2003. It was the final battle of the “official” conquest of Iraq. Even the Iraqi army admitted it was the deathblow. We call it the Battle of al-Hawasim (“the finals”). The same phrase, since then, is used to refer to any thug, thief, or criminal in the chaos of life after Saddam.

    Our entire army was concentrated in the south of Baghdad waiting for the American troops to come on land. But the American 101st Division of air-transported vehicles landed at the airport west of Baghdad and surprised Saddam’s army. The Iraqi response was to send the entire National Guard (the equivalent of the US Special Forces in training and skill) and all of Saddam’s freedom fighters directly to the scene. Many Arab men also voluntarily joined up to meet a certain death.

    Very few Iraqis survived the airport battle, which made it a myth on the tongues of the entire country. Rumors swirled around, mixed with stories from the few survivors, about the epic fight that took place at Saddam’s international airport. But now even the earth cannot tell us the truth about what happened—the land was completely burned by mysterious American weapons. After the war, the American army brought many bulldozers filled with new soil to cover the evidence before the eyes of thousands of Iraqis and to bury the thousands of stories that took place on the famous airport road, aka the Highway of Death. CONTINUE AND GO TO

  29. Gordon, this is the right path… focus and concentrate on the new 911 in preparation using radiological… if thiss can be avoided…then israel will fall before 2015 !


    THE NEUTRON BOMB & Inventor, Samuel Cohen: It Kills People & Pets But
    Leaves Buildings & Infrastructure Relatively Intact

    Did U.S. use neutron bomb in Battle of Baghdad?
    By Gary Wilson
    Published May 5, 2007 12:35 AM

    The U.S. military used neutron weapons in the Battle of Baghdad, says
    a former commander of Iraq’s Republican Guard. And at least one
    retired U.S. Army officer is backing up his charge.

    “The biggest story of the war became a non-event when the truth of the
    matter was that it was simply too bloody an event to report.” Captain
    Eric H. May, former intelligence officer.

    Ever more reports are emerging on the likelihood that the US
    experimented with tactical nuclear weapons against the Iraqi armed
    forces four years ago during the last days of the invasion.

    In a recent interview with The Iconoclast entitled “Battle of Baghdad
    Cover-up — Four Years Later,” Captain Eric H. May, a former
    intelligence and public affairs officer in the military, stated “The
    truth is that the battle started April 5, the night that Baghdad Bob
    said that they had counterattacked us at the Baghdad Airport and there
    was a sustained fight that went on for several hours. The best
    evidence that I have from international sources, scientific sources,
    is that our position was becoming untenable at the Baghdad Airport and
    we used a neutron warhead, at least one. That is the big secret of
    Baghdad Airport.”

    Martin Timothy is infamous around these partsMartin Timothy is
    infamous around these parts

    Zionists nuke Egypt’s Taba Hilton Hotel ..Beslan

    By Vladimir Ras-Putin, aka Gog of Magog!!! aka Joe Vialls

    For years Taba, Egypt has been used by western intelligence agencies
    as the “New Beirut”, a convenient and apparently neutral venue where
    terrorists employed by the Mossad and CIA, could plan covert ops
    against the oil rich nations of the Middle East. These agencies went a
    giant step too far when they invited dissident Yukos executives down
    from Moscow, in a bid to add Russia to their hit list.

    Anyone who has ever studied the Alfred P. Murrah building in Oklahoma,
    will notice very obvious similarities with the Taba Hilton Hotel in
    Egypt. A hypersonic blast wave has neatly removed the entire face of
    the building, and four days later on 11 October 2004 the ABC reported,
    “Israeli and Egyptian rescue workers ended their mission at the Taba
    Hilton bombing after they failed to recover the bodies.”

    Only critical nuclear weapons can generate the massive temperatures
    and pressures needed to instantly consume away, 16 missing humans into
    invisible heat and light.

  31. Joe Vialls on micro nukes used on American Marines at Beirut Lebanon:

    By his orders and actions, war criminal Sharon was making a deliberate point: The Yisraelim would rape or murder whichever Goyim they chose, whenever they chose, as was their ‘legal entitlement’ under the insane ‘laws’ of the Babylonian Talmud. In the words of the master war criminal himself, The Lebanon and Beirut in particular were “wonderful training grounds”, but the sheer level of brutal savagery at Sabra and Shatilla ensured growing attention by the international community, and over the Christmas period, the multinational peace keeping force more than doubled in size, headed by the Americans and French.
    The Zionists were furious when the multinational peace keeping force invaded their new training ground, and on 18 April 1983 they bombed the American Embassy in Beirut, killing 63 people. Then on 23 October the Zionists detonated two Dimona micro nukes outside the American and French marine barracks in Beirut, killing 241 and 58 soldiers respectively. The multinational peace keeping force swiftly retreated, leaving the Lebanese people as live targets for Mistaravim and other Zionist kill-teams wishing to hone their lethal skills.

    This was the first documented use of Yisraeli micro nukes outside Palestine, but it was not to be the last. Most notable of the new low-radiation micro nukes used overseas during later years for practice, reprisals and covert operations, were three detonated in London and a fourth in Bali. Intelligence received in 2003 indicates that Dimona has so far manufactured in excess of 600 of these exotic weapons. Most micro nukes remain in Palestine, though 220 have allegedly been pre-positioned in North and South America, with a further six deployed to Western Australia.
    Though the Yisraelis had already managed to butcher most of the Palestinian refugees in The Lebanon, they were attacked by an increasing number of outraged Lebanese, and by the Hizbollah, a new counter-insurgency army formed and funded by Syria and Iran, specifically to drive the Yisraeli terrorists out of Lebanese sovereign territory. By mid 1985 the Hizbollah gathered strength and efficiency, forcing the Yisraelis to withdraw to southern Lebanon, where they formed a new ‘occupation zone’ for the continued field training of Fortress Americas and other terrorist personnel. Between 1985 and 2000, more than 100,000 Yisraelim terrorists were ‘blooded’ in the south Lebanon occupation zone, until direct threats from Russia forced them to withdraw completely. And so it was that at exactly 0341 hrs GMT on 24 May 2000, the last Yisraeli tank left the Lebanon, crossing through the Fattier Gate back into Palestine.

  32. had the absolute best summary of all israel’s false flag attacks. If the got it wrong on Vialls/ ari Ben Menasche, they got everything else right including the story at the National Pencil Company in Atlanta which was said to be the galvanizing event for the creation of the DEFAMATION LEAGUE.



  33. Steve, I understand what you are saying. I was confident that people like you and others would keep Vialls site in one form or another if someone had not been working against that. But you and anyone else were unsuccessful, bottom line . Why?

    So despite what you have said, I believe SOMEONE made an effort to eliminate them to the greatest extent possible. had all of Vialls stories and if I’m not mistaken, they were not links to vialls sites. Truthseeker has nothing now and no explanation. does not have ALL of the Vialls stories and many of them are incomplete.

    I lost an almost complete collection of them with a stolen computer including un-retouched “pack rape” pics of Iraqi women. Some of those pics are still available but the “interesting” portions have been blurred. Who blurred them? Certainly not Joe Vialls, as I saw and saved the original pics which were not blurred.


    I also know what you are saying about The Ari Ben Menasche article seemed like bullshit at the time but now I am not sure. Judicial had articles that were more radioactive as far as jews are concerned than anything else anywhere on the net. They were not ignoramus articles. Judicial had no reason to shut down except for powerful harassment. Even if it was a disinfo site it would have been extremely valuable to such interests today because it was getting a huge readership.

    I don’t know the final answer on either but I don’t agree that your comments settle and fully explain the issue.

    I also wonder why the archived vialls articles are missing so many pics? I still say whatever happened to these two sites is a huge unanswered question.

    I actually believe the Government may have been responsible for my computer being stolen. The morning my car was looted they were seven county police cars with their trunks open at the storage facility where my car was parked. It was unusual to have county at locations in the city and the storage facility lied to me about them being there.

    I know it may sound ridiculous that the Gov would track down every last pic download but the truth is stranger than fiction today and they have a blank check to carry out any hair brained idea anyone comes up with. The US Government paid 2 million each “hush money” to all the victim’s families to help coverup the mossad crime.


  34. This needs to be included in the post:

    J. Bruce Campbell says:
    February 11, 2011 at 4:48 pm
    Dimitri has corrected my seven points above. [My points are in brackets.]

    Hi Bruce.

    I received all your letters.

    Yes, you are right in using the word “cultivated” by the Mossad. This was exactly the case. But you know, I am not too “cultural” to be really cultivated. Many people had broken their teeth on me before and the Mossad will not be an exception to this rule. This is sure.

    Regarding the rest – please see my comments below:

    Friday, February 11, 2011, 2:04:15 AM, you wrote:

    [Hi, Dimitri –

    Spent the day reading all the deniers and attackers and your very good responses to them.] —– I will try to send you one more of such piece today. I am preparing one with answers to certain Yan Zeman – one of the recent most spiteful critics of mine. Hope to finish it soon, perhaps today.

    [I’m having the same stuff in the piece I wrote the other day so I put this in the comments:

    Dimitri has several main points that should be kept in mind.

    1. He was approached around January, 2001 by Mossad agents in Bangkok, who “befriended” him.] ————– no, the Mossad agents befriended me long before that. In 1997 I guess. In the beginning of 2001 it was Harari, but those who introduced me to him knew me long before that.

    [2. He was introduced by them to Mike Harari, who became very friendly and wanted to know from him, did the Soviet military know about the nuclear demolition plan for the WTC buildings? (answer: yes)] —————– this is correct.

    [3. On September 12, 2001 he was a guest of Harari and the other Mossadniks at a celebration of the successful attacks of the day before. Harari said happily that it was the greatest thing he had ever done.] ———————— no we were only three there – Harari, me and his son. The rest of the Mossad people are too young to be in friendly terms with Harari – it is just like captains in comparison with 4 star general. Subordination would not allow him to be so close with the rest. But with me personally it is another story – because we were friends (or at least so it seemed). When it comes to the rest of the Mossad operatives in Bangkok – they were indeed celebrating and I also saw it, but it was separately and later in the day. While Harari had a celebratory breakfast early in the morning 12 of September 2001 (about 6 AM or so Bangkok time), younger Mossad guys were celebrating it later in the day and in a different location.

    [4. The FBI had him and Harari, who used an Arabic name and French ID, arrested for extradition to the US for selling nuclear weapons to terrorists and for supplying false passports to them. Harari escaped but Dimitri did over a year in jail fighting extradition and was successful. It was during his time in jail that he decided to tell what he knew to the public, since the US authorities already knew the truth but were trying to frame him. Now they are framing Viktor Bout for the same thing, and he, too, is totally innocent.] ————————– more or less correct, but Harari did not actually “escape”. He just arranged an unprecedented trick by hiring someone to stay in prison in his stead and the Thais and the French just pretended “not to notice” this fact. When it comes to Victor – it is 100% correct.

    [5. Dimitri is simply saying that because of his highly-specialized work in the Soviet nuclear security department, the 12th Chief Directorate, he and his colleagues were aware of the decades-old nuclear demolition plan for the WTC towers and the Sears Tower in Chicago. He does not attempt to present himself as an expert in nuclear demolition able to answer myriad technical questions on every aspect of the demo job. Although mini-nukes have been used maybe a dozen times to wreck targets and slaughter people, the three WTC buildings are the only ones to his knowledge that were obliterated and turned to powder. He suspects that this will not be done again due to the catastrophic results which would be easily compared with 9-11. Mini-nukes, of course. But the WTC yields were 150 KT each.] —————— yes, this is correct. But I can’t say that am an expert in particularly “nuclear demolition” since such things were not even conceivable in the former USSR. I am not even a big specialist in nuclear weapons in general, to be honest, because I lack a special education in this field, but, still, I could say that I know about nuclear weapons more compare to just an approximate military officer, due to my specific position in service – as you can see I know the basics that allow me to explain the physics of underground nuclear explosions and nuclear weapons designs, for example (not enough knowledge to make the actual nuclear bomb, still, hope you realize this).

    [6. In 2007 he discovered the truth about the Granit naval cruise missile, which was that the 500 KT nuclear warhead was left on it as evidence to US officials that terrorists had one more in each WTC tower that if detonated would flatten NYC and this threat persuaded US officials to bring the towers down using the thermonuclear devices placed below the sub-basements. He doesn’t claim to know the motive for bringing down #7 other than to destroy evidence of the whole plot. The Granit missile in the Pentagon was necessary to bluff US officials to destroy the towers.] ————— no it was a bit earlier than that. I knew about the Granit missile from my conversations with Mike Harari in 2002-2003, though I did not suspect that the nuclear warhead was on. But I got to know about the nuclear warhead in 2005 only. And, still, only in 2007 I finally learned that the fact of the nuclear warhead was used as a prop to “convince” the US officials that other similar nukes were allegedly planted by “terrorists” in the upper floors of the Twins and were allegedly “about to explode.”

    [7. The Mossad had him as the perfect fall-guy, since the cruise missile was Soviet and “everybody knows” about all the mini-nukes for sale from the old Soviet Union. As he says, “It’s not that easy to find a former Soviet nuclear security officer.” But they did and brought the chief (Harari) in to make him part of the family. Harari wound up in Bangkok to escape justice in Manila for killing Nick Rowe.] ——————————– correct. I noticed (though belatedly) some dirty game around me with constant attempts to connect me to nuclear trade even back in the end of the 90s. But I duly appreciated all of that only after the Bali bombing of 2002 when I realized the game. I don’t think they would be able the “Granit” missile on me, it will be a bit too much. It was mini-nukes only. But when it comes to Victor Bout – yes, in his case they made him a complete “culprit” – just for everything ranging from the “Granit” missile to the “mini-nukes” and enriched Uranium of weapon-grade.

    [Dimitri, like Lee Oswald, was set up long in advance to take the fall for this monster crime that would put America in its long-planned war against Islam on behalf of Israel.] —————– looks like, at least to a certain extent.

    [If these are good, you might consider them as introductions to yourself, as they seem to me to be important points. Please correct any errors. I should have made it clearer that the WTC weapons were not mini-nukes, as far as I understand them, but rather conventional-sized devices.] ———— correct. The WTC demolition devices were by no means “mini-nukes”, but huge hydrogen charges, a size of a barrel each and with yields 150 times that of a “mini-nuke” set at its maximum yield – 1 kiloton.

    ADDITIONALLY. I strongly suggest you to download and look carefully at these photos:

    I guess you will understand that it had nothing to do with “mini-nukes” (judging by the size of the cavities and by the amount of molten rock). Also you might be interested in this 1998 article:

    If you can pass this info to those people who are about to make the today’s interview, I will greatly appreciate this, so that they could have some ideas or adjust their questions to these points.

    Sincerely yours,

  35. How do you say this: Micro-nukes make depleted Uranium a walk in the park.

    All of this must be exposed & stopped.

    It is a crime against humanity.

  36. Note:God bless for Gordon Duff and JB Campbell for raising the micro and not micro (big nukes used at Baghdad and 9/11) just for all to land and see how far we are in the realm of deception and already started WW4. I left many leads on Joe-Vialls articles and Khalezov on the comments on Gordon Duff article on Wheeler’s assassination and JB Campbell article on Khalezov. Please google: Duff+Wheeler+micronukes (or Dr.Nur) and Campbell+veteranstoday+Khalezov. Also for radiations do Vialls+Bali+nuke and Vialls+micronuke+Hariri and Meyssan+uranium+Hariri.

  37. After re-discovering Jeff Hills large financial donation which made him refute all his years of “NO PLANE” research including his telephone calls…

    …Combined with the recent attacks on researchers like Dimitri and myself made by SIMON SHACK of LIES SEPTEMBER (sic) I am totally convinced the noplaners are largely dis-informationists out to obfuscate and confuse. *(Even the 9-11taboo director has shown bizarre behaviours of late)

    What sticks in my MIND much more is this link from January 2000. Be sure to read it all especially the last few paragraphs on page 2 concerning “showing faked plane crashes”:

    ” …He said that he understood the argument against the use of the technology — which is widely employed in sports and some entertainment shows — on news programs. The danger is ”that it looks too real and therefore it’s wrong or potentially wrong,” he said. ”I certainly agree it’s potentially subject to abuse.”

    He noted that advances in computer-generated techniques had made things like missiles hitting Baghdad and airplanes crashing look so real that it was incumbent on networks to underscore that these were not real images….”


    Why even mention missiles hitting Baghdad or planes crashing. BIZARRE choices of examples to refer to if you ask me…

  38. Joe Vialls websites were not “wiped” by the CIA. They expired after his death in 2005 and the hosting company simply expired the hosting when it financially ran out. I know because I telephoned the hosting company personally to see if I could re-finance his hosting to keep it online.

    I also telephoned Joes Widow to discuss whether she would allow me to do so, and not surprisingly she did.

    Judicial-Biz however were closed down numerous times by numerous hosters after repeated serious ICAAN terms of service violations including calling Joe Vialls an israeli : Ari Ben Menashe. Were these claims not completely laughable I might have taken judicial Biz a more seriously on some of their more interesting articles.

  39. Who says there are no radiations? Yes there are but like the great late australian journalist-scientist and martyr Joe-Vialls explains (assassinated by Mossad for his revelations) about Mossad’s Dimona micronuke bombing at Bali, but also of Hariri, Madrid,London etc.,is that they are highly purified plutonium nukes which give off little gamma rays which are those picked on radiation Geiger counters but rather give much highly lethal alpha rays which are inhaled in dust especially and give the radiation sickness seen in veterans and civilian victims of these isramerican genocidal war crimes, which is the main telltale syndrome. Of course the much talking about DU is a farce aiming at hiding the fraud and avoiding responsibility and lawsuits by the american ‘canon fodder’survivors veterans,cheap goyim cattle at the service the “master-race’s”narcopetrol wars for talmudic world enslavment.

  40. Remain cautious Gordon .Dimitri also totally discounts the use of nano thermite found by Prof Steven Jones,Prof Niels Harritt and many other scientists.These scientists say that other explosives are definite possibliity but they have not the evidence.We know that people just prior the plane’s crashing people experienced explosions in the lobby.So other devices were probably used.Dimitri is saying this was all nuclear,that a 150 mega ton nuke was set 50m below the basement of the towers and this caused the towers to pulverise into dust.

    I would get another scientific opinion Gordon.Speak to Prof Steven Jones.He is quietly spoken,in no way and egotist and in my opinion extremely honest.

    This could be an attempt to muddy the waters and make all theories look ridiculous,thus giving creedence to the official theory.

  41. Demitri is suggesting underground 150 Kton blast containing most of the radiation as in an underground nuke test. He says the shock wave from the blast would couple to the building and pulverize it in place at the speed of sound in steel: 3200 m/s. This is the only plausible nuclear theory for the WTC, as any above ground nuke would be apparent due to the blinding flash, which we did not see. I do not think Dimitri’s theory or super-nano-termites, lol, (nano thermitics also emit copious light, regardless of their popularity in the 9/11 termite movement, ahem) explain the effects seen at WTC. The NIST version of events has ZERO possibility of occurring, so we are looking at a Secret Weapon of implicit and very literal Mass Destruction, imho.


    This video (the non-frame-blended portion starting @0:30) is the most simple proof possible of a fake video of a fake event. Ace has slowed the video so we can count frames. It takes 11 frames for the plane to fly through it’s length in air, and 11 frames to fly through it’s length in a steel and concrete tower.
    This is a clear violation of Newton’s 2nd Law.
    There is no deceleration, so F=mass*0=0.
    There is no force available to break the building structure or the plane. 100% proof of fakery, with elementary physics!
    Ace Baker Treatise on video compositing:
    Blessings and good luck!
    Thanks Gordon!

  42. From my own research I have also come to the conclusion that many of the big “terror-attacks(tm) are from smaller nukes.

    The only thing is the strange effects seen on 9/11, I can see how one would think that it also was nukes – like so many other events, but the strange effects on cars, metal turning to dust and so on, the “dustification” (Judy Wood term) happening from above and so on.

    I really think that Judy Wood is on to something regarding the WTC’s. With that said, I understand completely how it could be hard to even entertain the idea that some kind of energy-based weapon did it, but non the less, it fit the best from the effects. Imho.


    (Yes, I know the site is a bit on the hideous side, but the information is very interesting)

  43. Sorry, but these articles are clips of the writings of the mysterious “Joe Vialls” who seems to have been vaporized by mossad owned and controlled CIA.
    In my haste to post these relevant articles, I failed to give proper credit to Joe Vialls.


  44. Mike
    A year ago, Bob Nichols came to me and said the US was using micronukes all the time. Then I put together a group of defense tech guys and reviewed the WTC. The problem we had was the placement of a nuke in the parking structure. It wasn’t deep enough to absorb the radiation as the WTC would not have been a micronuke but a demolition package. It would have had to be under the structure.
    Then Dimitri said it had been built into the building.
    Run the Larry Silverstein tape in your head…
    listen for the “BONG”

  45. Apparently Zionist Judge Mukasey was right when he thought two million dollars per family hush money, paid the families of those who died on 911 by the USA government would be enough to prevent those parties from asking too many questions.


  46. As Joe Vialls explains in my postings bellow , the simplest micro nukes would be only 19 lbs of pure plutonium. Finding any residue out of 19 lbs of plutonium in Manhattan would make finding a needle in a haystack the simplest matter.

    Perhaps plutonium micronukes are our first “green (terrorist)weapon”?

    BTW, who invented terrorism?


  47. The possible use of micro nukes doesn’t preclude the use of nano thermite in the World Trade Center demolitions. The evidence has already been collected and analyzed. Building six I believe was vaporized into a deep hole, probably dialed yield micronuke, no nano-thermite.

    Professional demolition companies like to mix and match and use whatever combination works best.

    Unfortunately nukes haven’t gotten approval fro commercial demolition jobs— yet.


  48. Concrete is an explosive when it comes in contact with molten metal as any foundry man or steel mill melt shop employee would know.

    Paint nano thermite on the bottom of the steel decking, .046″ inches thick, (easily accessible on the ceiling of each floor bellow) which supports the concrete floors when they are poured, ignite the nanothermite, melt the steel decking and cause the four inches of concrete to blow up.

    Why was the concrete so thoroughly pulverized? Concrete is an explosive, under certain circumstances. Buildings go down quicker when the concrete is turned to dust. It also makes it cheaper for the jewish owned cleanup company to remove.


  49. Poor Israel, blamed once again???????????? Why does Norman Finkelstein say the animus towards the jews is not irrational? Is it because the produce stupid TV shows like Seinfled? Surely that isn’t the only reason??


  50. One golf ball size hunk of plutonium weighing 19 lbs can go critical by itself if I’m not mistaken. Is that why Homeland (In)Security is checking one’s genitals at the airport?


  51. Michael J Volz:

    Joe Vialls lays out the facts & evidence which substaniates the Bali bombing was with a micro-nuke. Thanks for sharing.

  52. Regarding Dimitri Khalezov:

    There are several different individuals who have asserted a micro-nuke theory of demolition. Frankly, Khalezov’s theory isn’t the best of these theories for several reasons.

    I subscribe to the theory that micro-nukes were part of the WTC demolition.

    What is unique about Khalezov is his witness statement that ties the Israeli government to 911. Khalezov had contact with Mossad before 911 in January 2001, Mike Harari, a senior Mossad agent, met with Khalezov in Bangkok on September 12, 2001 along with some other individuals who were celibrating the success of 911.

    As J. Bruce Campbell, Veterans Today staff writer related:

    “Dimitri has several main points that should be kept in mind.

    1. He was approached around January, 2001 by Mossad agents in Bangkok, who “befriended” him.

    2. He was introduced by them to Mike Harari, who became very friendly and wanted to know from him, did the Soviet military know about the nuclear demolition plan for the WTC buildings? (answer: yes)

    3. On September 12, 2001 he was a guest of Harari and the other Mossadniks at a celebration of the successful attacks of the day before. Harari said happily that it was the greatest thing he had ever done.

    4. The FBI had him and Harari, who used an Arabic name and French ID, arrested for extradition to the US for selling nuclear weapons to terrorists and for supplying false passports to them. Harari escaped but Dimitri did over a year in jail fighting extradition and was successful. It was during his time in jail that he decided to tell what he knew to the public, since the US authorities already knew the truth but were trying to frame him…”

    It is this direct evidence of Mossad, and, thus, Israeli government involvement in 911 that makes Dimitri Khalezov a valuble source of direct evidence, not necessarily his theory.

    I take at face value Khalezov’s experience in the Soviet Union and agree this experience could quite possibly cause Mossad to seek out Khalezov.

    Debriefing Khalezov is a valuble endeavor.

  53. hey….this wasn’t where i went at first
    dimitri makes his point
    i can’t find another explosive with the characteristics
    i am not given many choices
    then again…dimitri has the creds…
    and nobody else does

  54. Hi Gordon
    I’m here BECAUSE i don’t believe the powers that be, i just found it hard to grasp it was a nuke. Al-tho i have always thought something else brought them down. But i have been reading and researching, and now GET IT.
    My father was a war baby sent to North Wales here in the UK. He spent his time with people who went on to join the Freemasons and the Air Force where some went on to do work for the Government(4 wks work for a years pay)He regularly told me never to believe what we are told, question everything, and to look for the stories that get covered up when the big stories break. And to look out for the false information. Unfortunately it is my friends who wont even take a look at anything, encase it shatters their cosy little world. I know they laugh at me behind my back, but i don’t care and will keep telling em anyway. 🙂

    keep up the good work.

  55. There are pictures of the landfill which show fire department trucks with little or no damage. If it is conventional, non-nuclear, why would they junk undamaged or little damgaged firetrucks?

    On the other hand, if it was nuclear demolition (not necessarily Khalezov’s version), then there are two possible reasons to junk undamaged firetrucks. One, there is nuclear radiation in the trucks. Two, the electronic components were fried by the ionized plasma (free electrons & ions) within the pyroclastic flows. This ionized plasma would “short” upon contact with metal components. Thus, with all the electronic components fried, to repair the firetrucks would be too expensive or, perhaps, more important, would raise too many questions.

  56. One thing the various photos of political bombings show for certain is that the damage to the Murrah Building in Oklahoma City could not have been caused by a truck bomb in the street alone. Neither the massive Khobar Towers bomb nor the enormous bomb that killed Rafiq Hariri in Beirut brought down even one of either building’s support columns, while ripping the entire facing off the buildings. See “Lying about Bombing” at

  57. Some clues about the 911 attack and radiation:

    The recent crash of a Boeing 747 in Halifax, Canada, raises a number of questions about the use of depleted uranium (DU) in airplanes, public health concerns and the 9-11 attacks. When a Boeing 747 crashed and burned on takeoff at Halifax International Airport in Nova Scotia, Canada, on Oct. 14, an official accident investigator said the aircraft probably contained radioactive depleted uranium.

    Bill Fowler, an investigator with the Transportation Safety Board of Canada, said the plane was likely equipped with DU as counterweights in its wings and rudder.

    “A 747 may contain as much as 1,500 kilograms [3,300 lbs.] of the material,” the Canadian Press reported. It took 60 firefighters and 20 trucks about three hours to control the fire.

    Now, some researchers are turning to the large number of sick firefighters and workers from the World Trade Center site and reports of elevated radiation levels around the Pentagon after 9-11. They contend that the Boeing 757 and 767 aircraft involved in the attacks may have also contained depleted uranium counterweights.

    If the radiation came from the explosion and fire at the Pentagon, it most likely did not come from a Boeing 757, which is the type of aircraft that allegedly hit the building.

    “Boeing has never used DU on either the 757 or the 767, and we no longer use it on the 747,” Leslie M. Nichols, product spokesperson for Boeing’s 767, told AFP. “Sometime ago, we switched to tungsten, because it is heavier, more readily available and more cost effective.”

    Bill Bellinger, then head of the EPA’s Radiation Program for Region III, which includes Virginia, told AFP that he had received information of elevated radiation levels and contacted EPA officials at the Pentagon.

    “I was concerned about that,” Bellinger said. “I didn’t disregard it at all.”

    Bellinger told AFP that he thought the radiation was from DU in the aircraft.

    Is Leslie M. Nichols correct or is this a Boeing cover up? I really don’t know. Did a 747 actually hit the Pentagon?

    The whole article is interesting.

  58. BBC, FOX news hang your heads in shame. Look CCTV China’s world propaganda arm are allowing debate on the causes of 911 and they are “a totalitarian communist state”.
    You should also be shamed by the quality and accuracy of reporting by the following news stations RT, PressTV and Al Jazeera.

    Richard Gage can’t get on U.S. propaganda channels, so he has to spread the truth about the 9/11 attacks on a Chinese propaganda channel.


  59. billy – you’re right about the cell phone cameras. I stand corrected. I just totally disagree with Dimitri’s assertion that the planes were visual FX.

    Also, some suggest the nanothermite was sprayed on like fire protection. Work like that could go on for months without anyone thinking it could be nefarious. In fact, the largest modernization of an elevator system in history was going on in the towers in the months before.

  60. bf:
    please get better informed , in 2001 no one had a cellphone camera !
    and there are actually practically no digital pics of the WTC disaster either , in 2001 even most professional reporters still used film cameras !
    there were just a handful people with those very expensive Kodak DCS digital cameras
    Can’t say wether there were real planes or not, as I wasn’t in NYC that day,
    but everyone here understands that those Boeings didn’t bring down the towers , so there remain just 2 solutions: nanothermites or a mini-nuke.
    As planting enough nanothermites on the pillars of those enormous buildings would have been time-consuming and suspicious, the nuclear theory seems more credible !

  61. No one here is saying planes took down the towers, we’re just saying that to suggest they used video FX instead of real planes/drones is BS. The chance of ten thousand phones with video cameras pointed at the first burning tower would make the idea that the second plane was a video effect a total load of BS. You would have a dozen videos with no plane, just an explosion. Suggesting video effects is thin and shoddy with no proof at all. Why would they even bother? You’re being tricked on this.

  62. Nanothermite would be unconventional too. Plus if it was sprayed on, like some suggest, it would account for the instant practically uniform pulverization/aerosolization effect you see.

    Check out Kevin Ryan talking about demolition access to the WTC prior to 9/11

  63. my positon on this…i had to be sold
    this is the last viable explanation left
    it fits
    as for radiation..
    we have a ton of very sick people
    all the first resonders are dying

  64. Planes are planes
    they just don’t bring down skyscrapers or turn steel into powder or molten metal
    that is insanity and anyone who believes it anymore is too crazy to take seriously

  65. That the planes were a video FX trick… please, that is total BS. And it is baseless. I think you’re getting bamboozled into promulgating what will discredit everything else.

  66. Ian:

    “And again, as a post script, aren’t nuclear weapons (as they have been employed in the cold war) principally “terror” weapons? What is the point of a nuclear weapon if no one knows that that’s what it is?”

    This is a fair statement that needs an answer.

    However, it’s also a statement that has a relatively easy answer.

    First, it’s the power of the blast and destructive capability with a corollary of control over that destructive capability.

    The micro-nuke is an expression of power & control. The powers that be love the symbolism.

    Second, and, perhaps, even more important than the above reason, the need for the ability to transport & place the explosive in secrecy & concealment (plausible deniability). Remember, a conventional explosive of comparable power and destructive cabability is much larger and, thus, harder to transport & place in secrecy, much harder to transport, period.

    Micro-nukes are incredibly easy to keep concealed.

    Maintaining plausible deniability is part and parcel of every black-ops event.

    Third, micro-nukes, because of their ability to be concealed, can be used in false flag events and maintain plausible deniability.

    Fourth, a secret message for other countries and their political leaders at the black-op level: “Nobody is beyond our reach.” — Ian, at the secret communication level between nations, this is a message designed to inflict a state of terror & intimidation upon oppositional political leaders.

    There’s your terrorism angle.

  67. hence the reason Isreal doesn’t want anyone to see what nukes they have. Basic army field manual states radiation can disapate to liveable levels in 2 weeks. That’s an old manual.

    leathal radiation doesn’t hang around for ten thousand years or else Horishma would never been rebuilt.

    I believe this guy and has offered the best theory so far. My cousin was a marine demo expert and he agrees: 9/11 and OK city were demolitions of some sort.

    Think about the new application for these nukes. Mini nukes that can level just one house in a city. Imiagine dropping them from a plane over a city.

    We already have radio active ammo. Heck we have spraying that all over the 3rd world.

  68. I do admit that it is possible, even likely if we are stictly speaking with regard to the advancement of weapons technology, I would just like a little corroboration. Something, anything concrete. Because if we take this to our families without something to stand on, we look nuts, right?

  69. Bali Micro Nuke – Lack of Radiation Confuses “Experts”
    “The bomb flashed and exploded like a micro nuke, but our Geiger counters don’t show any radiation”

    Copyright Joe Vialls, 21 October 2002, Updated 13 February 2003

    Zionist Nuclear Attack on Bali Officially “Buried” by Western Mediai – scroll down to brown update for details

    The delivery of American and Israeli micro nukes is always by swimmer to maximize security. You can watch the official American Special Atomic Demolition Munition training film via your Real Media Player by clicking the left link. Allow about one minute for download and automatic playing. If you do not have Real Media Player , click right link to download and install a free copy.

    Play Official SADM Film Clip Download Free Real Media Player
    It was precisely 11.30 p.m. on Saturday 12 October 2002, when someone somewhere pressed a button that sent a single coded radio-squirt to an underground aerial located in a monsoon drain outside the Sari Club in Bali. An unseen circuit closed and a primer fired, then one-millionth of a single second later, a terrible fireball formed under the street. Less than six inches in diameter and burning at a staggering 300,000 degrees centigrade, the fireball was a perfect shimmering sphere, made possible by 99.78% Plutonium 239 manufactured at the Dimona nuclear facility in the Negev Desert.
    Five microseconds passed while this fission monster from hell expanded, then the already-cooling fireball tore its angry way out into the street above, vaporizing all victims standing within thirty feet while simultaneously spreading two tons of deadly microscopic roadbed shrapnel in a lethal arc across Kuta Beach. Every survivor standing in direct line-of-sight of its awesome ultraviolet emission received terrible flash burns, the like of which three eminent Australian burns surgeons would later claim on TV they “had never seen before”.
    Less than ten-millionths of a second after the monster achieved critical mass, its searing thermal wave set fire to twenty-seven buildings in the immediate area, and spontaneously ignited automobiles parked two blocks away from ground zero. But as you will read later in this report, no ordinary Geiger counter from any nation could detect radiation from the weapon.
    This atrocity was the “punishment” meted out to Australians and others opposed to the Judeo-Christian Crusade against Islam. Ordinary everyday people, Australians in particular, who had earlier been sensible enough and brave enough to speak out against their Prime Minister’s slavish obedience to Ariel Sharon and George W. Bush in their ruthless quest to loot and destroy the Middle East. But the fission monster from hell was also designed to send a very clear and unmistakable message to like-minded dissidents in Britain: “Jump on the crusade bandwagon quickly, or our Dimona thought-reform folk will pay you a visit.”
    Political and paid “academic experts” were quickly thrust in front of television cameras to explain the inexplicable. How and why the bombing happened in the first place, and increasingly as harsh reality kicked in and facts became clearer, why dozens of full-size human victims had vanished completely without trace.
    Every bomb expert in the world knows that conventional explosives lack the heat and velocity to “vanish” complete bodies in this manner, except perhaps when crushed into total oblivion by a million tons of masonry as happened at the World Trade Center. When the dust from the biggest IRA bomb ever detonated in Northern Ireland finally cleared, the victims were still in the local area. Many were disassembled into large bloody body parts, but they were still generally recognizable.
    When a diminutive member of Hamas recently detonated thirty pounds of TNT strapped tightly around his own chest in Palestine, emergency services still had to remove large recognizable chunks of his dismembered body from the area. Believe me people, believe me, conventional explosive cannot “vanish” citizens without trace, and Bali simply did not have a million tons of masonry available to fall on their heads. Only a critical nuclear weapon has the heat needed for instant cremation, combined with the incredibly fast shock wave needed to completely remove the resulting cremated particles from the local area.
    Next big problem for the politicians and “experts” was the large crater in the street outside the Sari Club. Five feet deep and twenty-two feet in diameter, the crater served as proof that the weapon was detonated underground rather than on the surface. The only way any explosive can cause a crater is if it is first dropped from an aircraft and penetrates sub-surface before exploding, or if it is physically positioned sub-surface in advance. The thousand-pound Omagh bomb detonated in Northern Ireland by the IRA during 1998 did not cause a crater, nor has any nuclear weapon ever detonated above-ground regardless of TNT equivalence yield.

    Kuta Beach, Bali
    22 x 5′ Crater
    Omagh, Northern Ireland
    No Crater

    Politicians and “experts” alike had less of a problem than they originally thought with the crater. The helpful media folk simply refrained from showing it on television or in the newspapers, and the brainwashed public soon forgot about the crater altogether. However, there were considerably more problems with the savage blast and horrific burns “never seen before” in Australia. Knowing that even the public would not believe these could have been caused by a large packet of runaway Chinese firecrackers; it was time to start dishing out some serious disinformation.
    Less than 48 hours after the blast, media outlets claimed that investigators at the crime scene, “had found traces of C4”. This was a lie but nonetheless devastating news, because everyone with a television set and a Sylvester Stallone or Bruce Willis video knows how awesome C4 is [supposed to be]. Stallone sticks blocks of the stuff on every enemy installation in sight, and Willis uses it to knock down skyscrapers. In every case the resulting television blast is accompanied by a giant fireball designed to impress the hell out of you, to the point where C4 has become television’s “most powerful explosive on earth”.
    Unfortunately C4 is no such thing, and it is probably time to put this magic bullet down once and for all, and along with it all the other media myths surrounding Bali. Composition 4 [C4] is pretty dull stuff. Only 1.2 times as powerful as TNT, this plastic explosive gained its reputation primarily because of its flexibility in use. You can shape it anyway you like, and stick it wherever you want including underwater with little personal risk. Composition 4 is a stable and boring compound made from 91% RDX and 9% non-explosive Polyisobutylene plasticiser.
    Think about the formulation people, think very carefully. Could this possibly mean that 100% plain old everyday World War II RDX actually has more explosive power than the Stallone and Willis magic bullet? Sadly, yes it does. In fact about nine-percent more.
    The media in Australia were reminded of C4’s shortfalls, and further advised the giant oily fireball that always accompanies its detonation on television is not real. The giant oily fireball is a special pyrotechnic effect designed specifically to satisfy the “armchair soldier” lurking inside many television viewers. Real C4 contains no incendiary materials at all, and has a brisance [velocity of detonation] of just over 26,300 feet per second, tending to extinguish fires rather than light them.
    This caused the media to swiftly put their heads together with their paid “experts” to find an explosive device that the public could really believe in, short of a micro nuke of course. Less than 24 hours later the revised media fiction went to air as, “a minivan full of gas bottles, with explosives on top”. Evidently the aim was to force the public to believe the weapon was a FAE [Fuel Air Explosive] commonly known as the “Poor Man’s Atom Bomb”, which was successfully dropped by American aircraft on both Vietnam and Iraq.

    A “perfect” Fuel Air Explosive [FAE] burst, one-hundred feet above ground level
    Several telephone calls later, the media were forced to admit that a Fuel Air Weapon must be “burst” at least 100 feet above the target in order to create a stable ethylene oxide gas cloud suitable for ignition. They also learned that even air-launched FAEs cannot make craters because they do not penetrate the earth, and the suction force developed by the weapon when it grabs oxygen for combustion, is sufficient to drag a victim’s lungs out through his or her mouth. Horrific though the injuries were in Bali, there were none even remotely like this.
    By now the media and their paid “experts” were getting quite angry, finally suggesting in Australia that the blast and horrific burns were caused by high explosive “laced with napalm”. The fact that napalm leaves dirty stinking residue and soot all over the place, and produces burns quite different from those on the victims appeared not to disturb them.
    The napalm story failed to impress the public, and the media lead was taken over by ITN in London on 18 October, in the aloof haughty way that only a British television station with ‘real contacts’ can manage: “ITV News correspondent Julian Manyon, in the Indonesian capital, Jakarta, has been told by a highly placed western source that there was no plastic explosive and the bombers used a home-made brew similar to that which the IRA has relied on in the past in Northern Ireland and Canary Wharf.
    “The ingredients are readily available in Indonesia and experts suggest that they were almost certainly mixed together on the island of Bali itself.” Oh, really? The IRA used one thousand pounds of the stuff in the Omagh photo shown above, which killed nearly 30 people but made no crater, and failed dismally in its feeble efforts to create an instant fiery war zone.
    The perception of most members of the public where a critical nuclear weapon is concerned, was shaped decades ago in the wake of the American bombing of Hiroshima in Japan. An atomic bomb with a Uranium 235 core, nicknamed “Little Boy”, was detonated overhead the city with a TNT equivalence of 15,000 tons. For nearly two generations thereafter, members of the public were ‘taught’ that this was the text book interpretation for use after any and all nuclear detonations, despite the fact that nothing could be further from the truth.
    Little Boy was one of the ‘dirtiest’ fission weapons ever detonated in the atmosphere, with less than 1% of its critical mass undergoing true fission. Thus what remained after the explosion was a giant blizzard of lethal neutron, alpha, beta and gamma radiation. For practical [amateur] purposes we can forget the short-range neutron, alpha and beta radiation, which has trouble penetrating the human body.
    Over time it was to be the gamma radiation that would inflict such terrible injuries on the survivors of Hiroshima, including necrosis and ulceration. It is this gamma radiation that a standard Geiger counter detects, warning users that they are entering a hazardous zone. The standard Geiger counter can also detect significant quantities of beta, though this is more difficult. In summary, every Geiger counter within miles of Hiroshima clicked furiously for weeks after Little Boy went critical, primarily because of the gamma radiation.
    Time passed and by the late fifties these fission weapons were being “micronized” because they were needed as “core weapons” for hydrogen bombs. Incredible temperatures are required to start the fusion reaction in a hydrogen bomb, with the atom bomb the only device capable of providing them. So for a while at least, the text books accurately referred to the hydrogen bomb as a “fission-fusion” weapon, meaning the heat from the core fission weapon [atom bomb] started the fusion reaction in the larger weapon encasing it [the hydrogen bomb].
    It was not long before the scientists realized that in creating the tiny “core weapon” for the hydrogen bomb, they had also created a relatively lightweight micro nuclear weapon that could be carried by a single soldier for various uses against high value targets, including hydroelectric power stations and bridges.
    Less than two years later, the first of the SADM [Special Atomic Demolition Munition] series shown at the top of this page was pressed into operational service. The “standard” SADM that evolved would eventually have a core of Plutonium 239 encased in a thin shell of non-fissile Uranium 238 known as a “neutron reflector”.

    Plutonium and Napalm flash burns – but can you tell which are which?
    When the 10-ton TNT equivalence SADM went critical, it obviously created far less radiation than the huge and inappropriately named “Little Boy” at Hiroshima, but still produced dangerously high levels of residual radiation. Most of this came from SADM’s very “dirty” Uranium 238 reflector, which along with its Plutonium 239 core, exploded into millions of particles at the point of criticality. This same non-fissile Uranium 238 material still causes serious illnesses today, after being fired by American tanks and aircraft as sub-critical Depleted Uranium [DU] shells or missile warheads. Ask anyone in southern Iraq and Kosovo how sick this stuff can make you.
    The years rolled by and top-secret projects were initiated in America and Israel to replace the old SADM with its overly heavy weight and excess radioactivity, culminating in the successful development and testing at Dimona during 1981 of the “new” micro nuclear device. Using advanced nuclear physics, the scientists found a way of detonating the new “suitcase” bomb without the use of a Uranium 238 reflector, and further refined the Plutonium 239 in its core to 99.78%. These measures resulted in a weapon considerably smaller and lighter than SADM, which also had another enormous advantage.
    The new Dimona micro nuke was the very first critical weapon that could be used in “stealth” mode. Gone was the dirty Uranium 238 reflector, and up went the purity of the smaller Plutonium 239 core. You see, Plutonium emits only alpha radiation, which for all practical purposes is “invisible” to a standard Geiger counter. If you do not believe me then ask the American Environmental Protection Agency, whose staff will confirm this.
    In direct contrast with its more deadly cousins beta and gamma, alpha can travel only a few feet and is incapable of penetrating human skin. If you can afford an incredibly expensive and highly specialized Muller tube or similar, you may be able to detect tiny amounts of alpha directly outside the Sari Club, though you will more than likely be defeated in this quest by the Bali environment.
    Remember that this micro nuke was a tiny weapon in terms of critical mass, with its limited number of particles distributed over a very wide area. You will have to be within five feet to detect a single particle, and most may have already washed away. Bali lies in the Monsoon Belt with frequent heavy showers, and the Sari Club is located less than 200 yards away from the surf at Kuta Beach, which is where the monsoon drains in Kuta main street flow into the ocean. One week on from the blast, detection may already be too late.
    Though the alpha particles cannot penetrate the skin, such radiation is extremely hazardous if inhaled or ingested, because Plutonium is the most toxic substance known to man. If you breathed in a mouthful immediately after the blast you would be dead in less than an hour, perhaps within minutes. If instead you breathed in a single microgram, you might last for as few months. Anything in-between is on a sliding scale.
    The most dangerous time for burns victims as I understand it, is known as the “golden hour” immediately following the burn event. It is in this short critical time period that medical staff have the best chance of stabilizing the victim and hopefully accelerating his or her recovery. Nobody was helped medically this quickly in Bali because the resources simply did not exist. Thus those suffering excessive burns and/or shrapnel wounds alone, would certainly have perished during the waiting period.
    The next most critical period is when being physically manhandled from the scene and eventually evacuated to hospital in another country. If you manage to survive this second critical period and are suffering only burns and shrapnel injuries, your chances of long-term survival are extremely high. An air-conditioned hospital with every facility available in a western country, is a far cry from lying without help in the bomb debris of Kuta Beach.
    Despite this intensive care in a variety of different western countries, several of these victims have died quite suddenly and inexplicably under the latter favorable circumstances. Just how many in total we will probably never know, because governments in general have a common interest in preventing their citizens from ever finding out they were exposed to a critical nuclear weapon. It is not difficult to imagine the panic this news would induce in the general population, and even less difficult to envisage the torrent of legal actions against government from survivors and bereaved relatives alike.
    The distinctive pattern of the “vanished” victims, and the later sudden inexplicable deaths, provides a match for those following the Nagasaki Plutonium blast in Japan. Of particular note is the total number of “vanished” citizens, for those who vanished were certainly not restricted to westerners. Earlier this week a single Balinese kampong [village] buried seven empty coffins, and this was only one of at least a dozen different kampongs that provide labor to the clubs and shops in Kuta Beach.
    It was a moving ceremony barely covered by the western media, at which the headman of the village told an Indonesian journalist, “We know that we will never be able to find any parts of their physical bodies, but this ceremony will help their families to live in peace.” So a crowd of simple Balinese villagers know that their loved ones had been 100% vaporized, but the western public is deliberately left in the dark for political reasons.
    On a more encouraging note, it must be emphasized firmly here that very few of those survivors burned in the blast will actually die from internal alpha inhalation or ingestion at this late stage. Common sense dictates that ninety-percent of those close enough to ground zero to inhale or ingest an appreciable quantity at or immediately after the point of criticality, are most probably already dead.
    This is particularly good news for hordes of political and law-enforcement idiots, who could be seen wandering around the heavily contaminated Bali crime scene without even the basic precaution of paper face masks covering their noses and mouths. Paper face masks are not designed solely to prevent the inhalation or ingestion of alpha radiation. Paper masks should always be worn during the first week at any major crime scene when parts of decomposing bodies and associated vermin are present, especially in the tropics. Any deaths which later result from this criminal negligence, will be the direct responsibility of their supervisors.

    Indonesian police investigators wear correct facemasks and gloves, while unprotected Australian and British “investigators” stand around inhaling and ingesting residual contamination at the crime scene
    After this “Terrorist” attack on Bali, the Judeo-Christian road show predictably shifted up into high gear, with American newspapers reporting generically, “In the town of Solo, about 100 students from the school run by Islamic cleric Abu Bakar Bashir briefly blocked access to the Muhammadiyah Hospital where he is being treated for cardiac and breathing problems. Armed policemen stood by, but did not intervene” …”Authorities accuse Bashir of being linked to al-Qaida and said that his right-hand man, known as Hambali, was behind many of the country’s terrorist bombings. The two men are accused of being leaders of Jemaah Islamiyah, believed to be al-Qaida’s main ally in Southeast Asia.
    “Bashir was arrested Saturday for a series of church bombings across Indonesia on Christmas Eve 2000, in which 19 people died. He has previously denied involvement in those attacks as well as the Bali bombings — and insists the CIA invented Jemaah Islamiyah and al-Qaida as an excuse to persecute Muslims and foment religious violence”. Bashir is obviously correct in his claims, for no fictional member of “al-Qaida” could ever penetrate the massive security surrounding Israel’s Dimona in order to steal a critical nuclear weapon.
    Update 3 November 2002
    As further horrifying details of its illegal armed attacks on Muslims in their own homes reach local media, the Australian Government has been desperately trying to deflect attention back towards the “Muslim Terrorists” allegedly responsible for the Bali bombing. On the home front, Australian lawyers have revealed that during the pre-dawn raids last week, armed goons from the Federal Police and Security Service ASIO forced unarmed women and children to lie face-down on the floor, handcuffed them, and in some cases conducted strictly illegal full-body strip searches of the defenseless women without their consent.
    This last-named abuse is identical to the actions of the American 82nd Airborne in Afghanistan, who recently deliberately strip searched Muslim women in their own homes in order to dishonor their husbands. Further details of this obscene and illegal activity can be read by clicking on the “Australian Gestapo” link at the bottom of this page.
    Were it not so serious, this latest attempt by Australian authorities to pin the blame for the Bali bomb on “Muslim Terrorists” would be laughable. Officials are now claiming that the staggering blast which vaporized dozens of victims at Kuta Beach, was caused by a bomb “made from between 50 kg and 150 kg of chlorate”, the only quasi-explosive conveniently stolen from an Indonesian warehouse in Java during September. This new claim is in stark contrast to information posted on the official Australian Government web site less than one week ago:
    “Within 10-15 seconds of the first explosion at Paddy’s Bar, a devastating explosion was detonated in front of the Sari Club … The explosion resulted in a tremendous release of energy in the form of gas, heat and light. This essentially caused a pressure wave, fragmentation and fire – all of which contributed to the devastation seen at the Sari Club. As a measure of the force of the blast, the sound from the explosion was heard up to 15km away.”
    To claim that the Bali bomb was made from potassium chlorate [the variant stolen in Java] is pure idiocy, and the fact that such a claim was made at all, highlights increasingly desperately American and Israeli pressure on Australia to formally declare that “The Muslims did it”.
    Yes, you can manufacture a crude weapon from 90% potassium chlorate and 10% paraffin, but it is an incredibly slow and entirely unpredictable low-explosive. Provided the weapon did not detonate prematurely [a real risk with this unstable compound], four hundreds pounds of potassium chlorate & paraffin slurry with a Power Gel initiator might make a mess of Kuta Beach high street, but it could manage little else.
    At best, crude potassium chlorate & paraffin slurry has a pathetic velocity of detonation of 3,500 feet per second, compared to 12,000 fps for Ammonium Nitrate & Diesel, and 27,800 fps for RDX. Thus in simple terms, at any given distance from ground zero these different explosive compounds will exert ascending pressure in pounds per squuare inch on the target. Forget the impressive bang, which is simply the pressure wave from the weapon travelling at supersonic speed, and has no bearing on actual damage. The level of damage inflicted on the target is always directly proportional to the overpressure exerted in pounds per square inch, i.e. pressure over and above the standard atmospheric pressure of fifteen psi.
    Absolute proof that this Australian myth is a structured lie, can be seen in these photographs of a reinforced concrete structure located more than fifty feet away from ground zero. Every fragment of hard concrete has been completely stripped away by overpressure, leaving only the ductile reinforcing rods or bars, known in the trade as “rebar”. The critical significance of this is best explained by General Benton K. Partin USAF (Ret), who had overall responsibility for all research, development, testing, analysis, requirements generation and acquisition management of weapons systems in the United States Air Force.

    Concrete completely stripped from Reinforcing bar “rebar”, 50+ feet from ground zero
    In an official rebuttal to media and executive branch claims that the source of the awesome damage to the Alfred P. Murrah building in Oklahoma was a single truck bomb consisting of 4,800 pounds of ammonium nitrate & diesel low-explosive, General Partin wrote:
    “The detonation wave pressure (1,000,000 to 1,500,000 pounds per square inch) from a high detonation velocity contact explosive sweeps into the reinforced concrete structure as a wave of compressive deformation. Since the pressure in the wave of deformation far exceeds the yield strength of the concrete (about 3,500 pounds per square inch) by a factor of approximately 300, the concrete is turned into granular sand and dust until the wave dissipates to below the yield strength of the concrete.
    “This leaves a relatively smooth but granular surface, with protruding, bare reinforcement rods, a distinctive signature of damage by contact explosives. The effect of the contact explosive on the reinforcement rods themselves can only be seen under microscopic metallurgical examination. (The rods are inertially confined during the explosion and survive basically intact because of their much higher yield strength and plasticity.)”
    Note here that General Partin is referring to explosives “in contact” with the reinforced concrete structure requiring between 1,000,000 and 1,500,000 pounds per square inch to strip the concrete away, leaving only the bare reinforcement rods. Think about this people, think about it. The stripped reinforcement rods in Bali were more than fifty feet away from the weapon, and thus not in contact at all.
    Because blast through a fifty foot air gap is a very inefficient energy coupling mechanism against heavily reinforced concrete, four hundred pounds of the fastest chemical explosive so far touted by the Australian Government, RDX, would exert [but would not exceed] approximately ten pounds per square inch, fifty feet away from the point of criticality at ground zero. An equal weight of Potassium chlorate would be lucky to exert two pounds per square inch at the same range.
    The problem here is obvious, and the only accurate conclusion about Kuta Beach is impossible for the Australian authorities to simply wish away with wild tales about potassium chlorate detergent all too conveniently “stolen from Java”. To cause the actual damage photographed at the crime scene in Bali, we must have a weapon with a compound yield, and velocity of detonation fast enough to ensure one million pounds per square inch of retained pressure fifty feet away from ground zero. There is only one weapon in the world compact enough to perform this staggering trick: A micro nuke from Dimona in the Negev Desert. .
    Update 10 November 2002
    On the morning of 6th November, my claims about a micro nuclear weapon in Bali were published on the front page of a major newspaper in Java. Apparently the claims were enthusiastically embraced by Indonesians already deeply suspicious of Australia’s unseemly and entirely unnecessary involvement in the Kuta Beach investigation. To understand the level of outrage and mistrust, ask yourself how angry you would be if a bunch of uninvited Indonesian police turned up to “investigate” a crime in New York, London or Sydney.
    Early the next morning, members of the Indonesian Government in Jakarta became involved and called urgently for further details about the nuclear device. And so it was that by 10 a.m. on 7th November, the ludicrous Australian-American myth about “Jemaah Islamiyah” and “al Qaeda” attacking Bali, was rapidly starting to unravel across Indonesia.
    According to a well-placed government source in Jakarta, firm action was then taken to reverse the situation, and restore the Australian-American myth in the eyes of the public. Sometime around noon an Indonesian general connected to TNI, ordered that a man called Amrozi be ‘strongly’ encouraged to confess.
    To quote the Jakarta government source, Amrozi “was hooked up to 220 volts, given a cup of Scopolamine, and thirty minutes later was ready to swear he was George Bush”. Our brave Australian and American investigators neatly sidestepped direct involvement in this torture, by lamely telling television viewers at home that they had “no need to interrogate the suspect personally”.
    In reality Amrozi is a motorcycle mechanic from east Java, whose wife and neighbors can prove he never left his home island, but this awkward truth was of no concern to the general, nor to his western paymasters. By early morning on the 8th of November, the western media obediently started parroting claims that Amrozi was a “known associate of Jemaah Islamiyah”, with indirect links to “al Qaeda”.
    By late afternoon the same day, al Jazeera television, the nice folk who brought you the blatantly forged video footage of “Osama Bin Laden” last year, issued a press release stating that, “al Qaeda has accepted full responsibility for the Bali bombing”. Wrong! The web site on which this bogus claim was made, is owned and discreetly operated by a ‘blind’ company in Qatar, the home base of al Jazeera.
    It was perhaps on this date that we finally slipped seamlessly into a post-Orwellian media world, where those who control the present ignore the past, and don’t give a damn about the future. As if bewitched, journalists worldwide jumped on the Thought Police band wagon, telling us to believe that an imaginary terrorist organization had motivated a motorcycle mechanic in Java to kill nearly 300 people in Bali, using only a van full of Potassium chlorate detergent. As George Orwell foresaw in his famous novel “1984”, there seems to be little we can do at present about this blatant media disinformation:
    “At present nothing is possible except to extend the area of sanity little by little. We cannot act collectively. We can only spread our knowledge outwards from individual to individual, generation after generation. In the face of the Thought Police there is no other way.”
    No matter the level of direct and indirect media control, the vexing problem of a newly alert Indonesian Government had still not been completely resolved. What if a suspicious minister [or ministers] managed to slip the right scientific equipment into Bali, and detected residual traces of slow alpha radiation from the micro nuke at Kuta Beach?
    Help was soon on the way to deal with this possible contingency. On the morning of Saturday 9th November, just three days after my claims were published in the Indonesian newspaper, Intelligence services in London used the British Home Office as a ‘front’, and issued a dire warning that “al Qaeda might be planning to attack the west with a dirty radiological weapon”.
    For those not fully conversant with this dreadful technology, it was helpfully explained that a radiological weapon is a conventional explosive bomb with nuclear waste wrapped around it. When the bomb explodes it hurls radioactive material outwards, causing terrible injuries to the victims of the blast. Of course, the Home Office warning was swiftly “retracted’ six hours later by Minister of Home Affairs David Blunkett, who said it was a “clerical error”, but not before the bogus warning had been peddled to the public by every television network in the western world.
    This is not the first time that British intelligence has used this technique to subtly deflect attention away from a real micro nuke. The same claim was peddled back in 1993 after micro nukes were used on the City of London, as indirect warnings for the City to fall in line behind New York. I recorded this earlier intelligence leak in a report first published in 1993, and posted on the Internet six years later.
    “During early May 1993, ITN World News from London carried an interesting feature in which it was explained that due to thefts of highly-radioactive Uranium 235, terrorists would now be able to contaminate conventional bombs with 500 grams of Uranium, thereby forcing the police to stay away from the area for days. Exactly why experienced terrorists would risk detection & death by transporting deadly unshielded Uranium around in their pockets was not explained.
    “There is no credible reason for keeping the police and other authorities away from a bombsite after the weapon has been detonated. However, the rumor could form the basis of a government defence in cases where American or British citizens located positive traces of radiation, near the World Trade Centre or in the City of London, for example.” The original 1993 report can be read here.
    The British Home Office never makes “clerical errors” of this magnitude, especially on a Saturday when its civil servants are at home for the weekend, and the only people left in the Home Office building are duty spooks and cleaners. The bogus story was released specifically [and only] to cover any future discovery of radiation at Kuta Beach.
    Now if an Indonesian minister manages to establish that traces of slow alpha radiation are still present in Bali, all the deranged General has to do is collect a few more “suspects”, hook them up to 220 volts, pour Scopolamine down their throats, and urge them to “confess” that the mythical “al Qaeda” provided nuclear waste to wrap around their homemade bomb constructed from potassium chlorate detergent.
    Update 18 November 2002

    Indonesian Parliament Claims Micro Nuke in Bali

    Amrozi – Bali’s Alleged Psychedelic Nuclear Bomber
    On Monday 18 November, Indonesian Parliamentary Speaker Amien Rais said he questioned the validity of the police conclusion that “Amrozi” was the main perpetrator of the Bali bombings which claimed more than 187 lives. Rais was supported by Deputy House Speaker A.M. Fatwa, who stated, “`My conscience says that he is not a key actor. I don’t believe that Amrozi has the capability to make all kinds of the preparations for the bombings, like setting off a kind of micro nuclear bomb in Bali.”
    These pointed observations by two of the most powerful politicians in Indonesia, designed to counter deliberate Australian police & media disinformation about the bombing in Kuta Beach, were then recorded verbatim in the official Indonesian parliamentary transcripts. A wide range of media outlets in Asia and the Middle East reported Rais and Fatwa’s comments, which were predictably ignored in Australia and America.
    It was late on Wednesday 15 November, just one day before the special Hindu cleansing ceremony of the Bali bombsite in Kuta Beach, that the local Indonesian police chief thoughtfully paraded “prime suspect” Amrozi in front of the assembled media pack. The fact that Amrozi was clearly disoriented, rambling, as high as a kite on drugs and separated from western journalists by a thick glass wall, was apparently not a problem for our sacred guardians of the truth.
    Despite the obvious audio impediments and complete lack of direct access, Australian and Singaporean media outlets were nonetheless able to “accurately” interpret Amrozi’s muffled and garbled mixture of Javanese and Indonesian, to mean that he confessed to killing nearly 300 people at Kuta Beach, with a minivan full of potassium chlorate detergent stolen from Java.
    Not only that, but as Amrozi peered hopefully through a thick psychedelic haze to wave cheerfully at the television cameras, we were further asked to believe he claimed to enjoy killing people, wanted to kill some more, and in particular wanted to kill lots and lots of Americans. So thick was the psychedelic fog surrounding him, Amrozi completely forgot that the punishment for “confessing” to such crimes in Indonesia is death by firing squad.
    Needless to say, the entire media event was contrived rubbish, but it served the purpose for which it was mounted, i.e. to drive increased levels of Australian hatred against Amrozi, and through him against all Muslims across south east Asia. Australian relatives of the dead at the Hindu ceremony understandably shouted “kill him”, while Australian politicians at home took the opportunity to increase religious and ethnic division with comments including “ugly sneering Indonesian attitudes”, and “these people are vicious and dangerous.”
    To establish exactly who arranged and paid for the Amrozi charade in Bali, we need only look at exactly where the story was covered and broadcast in excessive detail by the western media, and who benefited most from staging the charade in the first place. Australians were beyond doubt the prime media target audience, with Indonesians following a close second. There was also significant coverage in Great Britain, but virtually none at all in America.
    Think about it people, think about it. Here was the alleged Bali “culprit” confessing to one of the biggest civilian mass murders in history, and apparently linked to the very same alleged “terrorist organizations” peddled incessantly by the American media. On its own track record, New York should have snapped the story up immediately, and used it relentlessly to further promote its fictional “terrorist” groups.
    The only possible or plausible reason for this spectacular event not hogging American television prime time for the same three long days it did in Australia and Indonesia, is that US authorities already knew it was a pathetic scam, quite probably funded by its own shadowy agents in Bali handing out thick wads of crisp $100 bills to corrupt officials. Beneath that lies the 99% probability that Judeo-Christian Americans arranged the Bali attack themselves, in order to “socially engineer” Australian public support for the forthcoming oil crusade in the Middle East.
    Subject as always to political pressure, members of the Australian Federal Police in Bali cheerfully threw their questionable weight behind the Amrozi “confession”. When AFP forensic chief Royds was asked whether he believed Amrozi was telling the truth to police, Mr Royds said: “I believe so”. Unfortunately for the Australian Government, members of the AFP also appeared to confirm that earlier claims identifying the so-called “chemical explosives” in the Bali bomb, were at best pure guesses, and at worst outright lies.
    It was explained to assembled journalists that because evidence at the crime scenes had been washed away by fire hoses, investigators had this week acted on British advice to “climb up light poles and take forensic swabs from roof tiles, signposts and other places that had not been wet.” Oh dear, if you tell enough lies for long enough, you will surely be found out.
    So, are members of the Australian investigative team now prepared to say exactly which explosives were used to make the Bali bomb? Well, no, they have now fallen atypically silent, apart from making irrelevant and inane remarks about the bombers having “amazing chemical skills” and “the ability to build very sophisticated weapons.” And for the first time in many weeks, these same investigators have suddenly decided to wear full-length protective clothing, including facemasks and airtight hoods.
    Claiming “amazing chemical skills” for the bombers is seriously understating the case. Any alchemist out there who could transmute potassium chlorate detergent into a critical plutonium nuclear weapon of the kind detonated at Kuta Beach, would instantly win the Nobel Prizes for chemistry and physics, before being politely but forcibly inducted into the American nuclear program at Los Alamos Laboratories.
    Although providing no details about the bomb personally, the AFP representative who spoke to the media stood right next to a large board, on which was clearly written the word “Semtex”. Oh no! The Bali bomb was surely not made from the deadly Czechoslovakian plastic explosive allegedly used in tiny quantities by “Muslim Terrorists” to blow up Pam Am 103 over Lockerbie? No, because that would be impossible, but the board was certainly placed next to the AFP representative to subliminally suggest that you, the viewer, should believe Semtex was the probable villain.
    In reality, the most powerful version of this “terror” explosive, Semtex–H, is only 1.104 times as powerful as TNT, and thus substantially weaker than either C-4 or RDX. Manufactured by the Semtin Glassworks in Czechoslovakia, the most common version of Semtex-H contains 42% RDX and 41% PETN, with the balance made up of antioxidant, plasticizer and binder. Semtex had nothing, I repeat nothing, to do with the blast outside the Sari Club. Nor did any other “chemical” explosive.
    Yesterday it was discreetly announced that the contents of the crater, and other debris from the bombsite would be disposed of far out to sea, as a final step in the “Hindu cleansing process”. The fact that no Hindu cleansing process known to man requires that nuclear-contaminated waste be buried far out to sea, seems to have escaped media attention. Dumping your nuclear waste in an ocean trench and then blaming it on the Hindu religion is an ingenious idea, in this case based on pure desperation.
    . Late yesterday the diggers started work, frantically removing structures from Kuta high street before they could be subjected to proper examination by suspicious politicians in Jakarta. The first target of this combined mechanical assault was the building shown in the pictures above with the exposed reinforcing bar, an embarrasing monument perpetually proving the nuclear nature of the blast. Not any more it isn’t, with trucks swiftly removing the rubble for a tasteful religious burial far out to sea.

    Immediately after the Hindu cleansing ceremony, diggers and wrecking balls were
    sent in to remove the crater contents and other material for burial “far out to sea”
    Removing the physical evidence will heighten rather than diminish the controversy, and it will certainly not stop those determined to prove that this was not an attack by Muslims on Indonesian, Australian, and British soft targets. Perhaps more significant now that the dust has literally settled, is determining exactly how many people are still officially missing: critical numbers that are currently some of the best-kept secrets in the west.
    You see, by allowing the diggers and wrecking balls to move in yesterday and demolish the site, authorities have made it clear publicly that they have now recovered every available body part from the crime scene. If they had not recovered every available body part, international convention would require that the crime scene remain a crime scene for as long as it takes to effect full recovery, normally several months for an incident as huge as this one.
    Jakarta politicians may not yet be aware of the fact, but a nuclear event can be proved not only by available evidence at the crime scene, but also by evidence that should have been recovered and stored away from the crime scene, but was not. Because a nuclear weapon is the only device capable of generating sufficient heat and pressure to completely vaporize human bodies, a substantial deficit of human remains at the site, or in correct storage afterwards, is as convincing and damning in the nuclear sense as finding slow alpha radiation lurking in a monsoon drain.
    As stated these figures are very hard to come by, and your help is needed to track them down in your own country. It seems likely on present estimates that the actual death toll is not 182 as claimed by Australian authorities, but much closer to 300. If you live in Indonesia, Britain, Germany, France, New Zealand, or any other country affected by the blast, do your best to obtain your own country’s total number of confirmed dead, and those still unaccounted for. Note here that it is the “unaccounted for” figures that western governments are desperately trying to conceal, because they and they alone have the easy ability to blow the Bali “body scam” wide open. Please send a copy of your results to [email protected] Crude figures available at present indicate that a minimum of 40 Australians are still missing, 30 British, 7 German, 3 French and possibly 6 New Zealanders. I know this sounds gruesome, but if these figures are even close to accurate, then the authorities in Bali must have 86 x 120 lbs average weight of body parts in storage, before we make an allowance for dehydration and decomposition. Let us be generous and allow a full 30% deduction for dehydration and decomposition, meaning the authorities must currently have a minimum of 7,224 pounds [ 3.61 TONS] of body parts in storage awaiting identification.
    If the current figure in storage is much lower than that, as I have been repeatedly assured it is by Balinese contacts, then a large number of human beings were turned into heat and light at the micro nuclear weapon’s point of criticality. If we can accurately determine the total number of “unaccounted for” victims, then we can apply simple arithmetic to calculate how many of them vanished in the first five microseconds of the 300,000 degree centigrade fireball.
    It is already being rumored [but has not yet been confirmed], that authorities have been speeding up the process by “cheating” on the body parts. Put simply, and mostly in order to give the affected families rapid “closure”, coffins containing as little as a single DNA-identified arm have been buried, with the balance of the body weight made up with sandbags. Normally such a procedure is used for genuinely humane reasons, and provides the family with a physical grave to mourn over. Nothing wrong with that so far as it goes, because the procedure hurts no one and helps relatives get over the tragedy. Nor is it unusual. The procedure has been used countless times in the past at major disaster sites.
    The problem we face is that of forensic authorities trying to use this procedure to “cover” for the deficiency in body parts, by suddenly “speeding up” the identification process in a bid to camouflage the huge deficit in stored body parts. Fifty quick funerals with only twenty pounds of body parts in each coffin would certainly help to do that. We therefore need to establish the total weight of body parts in storage TODAY, and make a note of it for future reference. Any Indonesians reading this please do the best that you can, and send the accurate figure to the email address above
    Update 13 February 2003

    Zionist Nuclear Attack on Bali Officially “Buried” by Western Media

    Amrozi, Alleged Bomb Supplier
    Written Police “Confession”
    “Chlorate, aluminium powder & fuze”
    Colonel Zainuri Lubis
    Indonesian Police Expert
    “Chlorate, black powder & TNT” Tim Morris, Counter-Terrorism
    Australian Federal Police
    “Chlorate, detonator cord & TNT”

    Alarmed by new evidence which points directly at the real villains behind the atrocity in Bali, commercial and government-owned western television networks worked together last week to finally “prove” that an unlikely bunch of poor and ill-informed Muslim villagers from central Java, were responsible for the exotic million-foot-per-second nuclear blast that killed more than 200 people at Kuta Beach on 12 October 2002.
    Western governments and media alike have become especially nervous about three renegade American investigative journalists, who managed to penetrate Denpasar Airport, and establish that certain aircraft movements on 12 and 13 October have been deliberately deleted from the control tower logs, though details still exist in the aircraft handling logs, i.e. those kept by the ground crew responsible for refueling the aircraft, checking its tires, and so on.
    At least two of the deleted aircraft were wearing “false number plates”. All altered tower log pages, and those pages of the handling logs which prove the arrival and departure times of the three “mystery” aircraft, have now been meticulously photographed and stored for future use. More details about this later.
    Painfully aware that poor Muslim “terrorists” from small villages in central Java simply cannot afford very expensive jet and prop-jet aircraft, the collective western media was ordered to put the Zionist boot in before the airport deception became more widely known. The Bali bombing has always been a big problem for western governments. Prove that Bali was initiated by murderous Zionists solely to “encourage” more Australian support for an attack on Iraq, and at the same time you prove that almost every other “Muslim Terrorist Attack” on the west was conducted by the same Zionist fanatics. Such a revelation could not be allowed under any circumstances.
    So the media rushed in where only fools dare to tread, and managed to make a complete cock-up of the entire exercise. Despite the fact that everyone has allegedly already “confessed” to the bombings at Kuta Beach, and despite the media trying desperately to avoid mentioning the pathetic potassium chlorate “detergent bomb”, details did finally emerge. Unfortunately, the Indonesian police cited one formulation for the bomb and the Australian Federal Police cited an entirely different formulation for the bomb, neither of which matched the ingredients written down in suspect Amrozi’s “confession”.
    These conflicting statements were made on exactly the same day to different western media interviewers! According to the Australian Government, the AFP has been working “closely with the Indonesian Police” ever since the atrocity on 12 October 2002, when manifestly the Indonesian Police have not been cooperating with the Australian Federal Police at all.
    No doubt assisted by Sodium Pentathol and probably while hooked up the mains electricity supply, suspect Amrozi originally “confessed” to supplying potassium chlorate, aluminum powder and fuze wire, which could not explode no matter how you mixed it together. Remember here that potassium chlorate crystals are not explosive, and need sophisticated treatment and augmentation to even contribute to a low-explosive blast. Translated to Kuta Beach, Amrozi’s “bomb” would have been no more dangerous than a child’s firework.
    Australian Federal Police Director of Counter Terrorism, Tim Morris, was a little more inventive. Tim claimed the bomb was composed of “chlorate, detonator cord [cordex] and TNT”. Getting better here, Tim, getting better! The TNT would certainly trigger the cordex, or the cordex trigger the TNT, but neither would do anything to the inert potassium chlorate detergent crystals, which must first be blended very carefully with an exact quantity of paraffin wax [fuel] before they can augment anything. Translated to Kuta Beach, Tim’s bomb would have killed a few people from blast alone, while simultaneously bleaching the shirts of hundreds of survivors.
    Indonesian police explosives expert Colonel Zainuri Lubis, blandly claimed the bomb was composed of “chlorate, black powder and TNT”, which were “mixed together”. Colonel Lubis is a genuine explosive expert [unlike Amrozi and Tim], who smiled broadly throughout his media interview, and seemed to be deliberately misleading the pathetic western media lobby confronting him. For many months now, most Indonesian media and the official Indonesian Parliamentary Records in Jakarta, have recorded the reality of a nuclear blast at Kuta Beach, NO details of which have managed to find their way into the western press. So Colonel Zainuri Lubis gave the latest idiot western media pack an idiot composition to pass on to its idiot viewers.

    Alleged “Bali Bomber” Ali Imron demonstrates how he assembled the chlorate-black-powder-TNT
    device, but conveniently forgets to explain why he wasn’t blown sky-high when trying to mix it!
    Along with every other explosive expert on earth, Colonel Lubis knows very well that you cannot mix sharp potassium chlorate crystals with sensitive black powder particles. Well, you can try of course, but not if you wish to live long enough to go home for dinner. The split-second “the bomber” started mixing, the sharp chlorate crystals would create immense friction across the surface of the black powder particles, which would then react violently by either exploding or burning furiously, depending on particle size.
    At the same time, an exothermic [heat] reaction would start between the two compounds. If the friction didn’t get “the bomber”, the exothermic reaction would, instantly transforming :the bomber” into a white-hot Roman Candle. So Colonel Lubis’s chosen bomb cannot be translated to Kuta Beach, because the mythical bombers would already have been burned to death in their mythical “secret bomb making laboratory”.
    It seems that all of us in the west owe a big vote of thanks to Colonel Zainuri Lubis. Unable to comment on the true nature of the nuclear device in Bali because of severe political constraints placed on him by Bali Police Chief General Made Pastika, Colonel Lubis nonetheless managed to find a way of leaking the absurdity of the western media “Muslim witch hunt” to tens of millions of western viewers, using the increasingly desperate western media lobby as a willing though pitifully unwitting conduit!
    Parallel investigations in Bali by three “renegade” American investigative journalists, have thrown up some interesting and potentially damning facts about events on the night of 12-13 October 2002, in which the air traffic control logs have been deliberately “edited” to exclude some highly suspicious aircraft movements in and out of Denpasar. Most suspicious of course is the editing itself. Why would anyone go to the trouble of breaking into the control tower and deleting the flight details, if the aircraft in question were engaged in legitimate operations that could be easily explained at a later date?
    Most interesting is a Canadian De Havilland Dash 7 carrying the registration C-FWYU, which landed in Denpasar four hours before the explosion at the Sari Club, and took off again for an unknown destination one hour after the weapon exploded. This flight was “whited out” of the control tower logs, but can still be identified by shining a bright light on the back of the log page in question. Full details of the flight are shown in the aircraft handling logs, which someone presumably forgot to delete, and which have now been photographed for future legal use if required. Denpasar ground crew members remembered this particular aircraft well, because it was in their words “very distinctive”, an observation that deserves explanation.
    Only about 100 Dash 7 aircraft were ever made, which ensures that any one of them is a curiosity at any airfield in the world. The only four engine STOL [Short Take Off & Land] aircraft produced in the last thirty years, the Dash 7 is easily identified by its four jet-prop engines and thick-bladed props, high “T” tail and huge landing flaps. Even when fully loaded the Dash 7 can take off with zero wind assistance in 600 yards. The aircraft is excellent for low flying reconnaissance and radar evasion, as proved by the American Special Operations version known as ARL-C [Airborne Reconnaissance Low – Model C]. When carrying a light payload and only 50% fuel, the Dash 7 is also the only four engine STOL plane in the world that can take off and land on an aircraft carrier deck, without external steam catapult or arrester hook assistance.

    The photo is for illustration only, and shows C-FWYU in the colors of Conair Aviation of Canada, who flew it many years ago in the remote Canadian north. It must be stressed that at the time of the Bali bombing, the Dash 7 in question was not in any way involved with Conair or any of its subsidiaries. Checks reveal that C-FWYU was sold and removed from the Canadian Register in August 2002, and was thus no longer entitled to display this Canadian registration on its fuselage. So bearing in mind that we do not have the actual aircraft’s documents and thus a corroborating hull number, and also bearing in mind that painting a set of false registration marks on any fuselage is child’s play, exactly which Dash 7 was really present in Bali that night, and why the absolute secrecy?
    Where “C-FWYU” came from and where it went remain a mystery. Despite its dazzling STOL performance the Dash 7 is extremely limited in both speed and range, for all essential purposes limiting its operating base to Singapore, Darwin, or perhaps to an aircraft carrier at sea. We do need to find out exactly what C-FWYU was doing that night, and we do need to establish the current owner. I have so far failed in my attempts to find this information, so anyone who can establish these points is asked to copy the details to [email protected]
    There were two other aircraft deleted from the control tower logs, though they seem less important. Both are Lear Jet 45 fast business jets listed on the Australian Register, but their landing and take off times are not as precise as Dash 7 registration C-FWYU. For this reason I am not at this stage publishing their registration numbers, for fear the information might prove both distracting and misleading. The bottom line is that the pathetic suspects from central Java could not under any circumstances have acquired sophisticated aircraft such as these, and we now need to backtrack the “real” bombers using this fresh information.

    Biggest Newspaper in Indonesia Denies Conventional Explosives Were Used in Bali
    By Robert S. Finnegan – National News – January 03, 2003

    On October 12, 2002 the Indonesian island of Bali experienced a terrorist attack that rocked the world. It was unquestionably well-coordinated and executed, the largest in the country’s history.
    Investigators and forensics experts from both national and international teams that had quickly been assembled flocked to the crime scene, ostensibly to begin what should have been a long, drawn out exercise in forensics and investigative sleuthing to identify and capture the foot soldiers, coordinators and masterminds behind the attack that has left over 190 known dead, scores missing without a trace and hundreds more wounded It has turned out to be anything but that.
    The Indonesian government immediately vowed to unite in the hunt for the bombers. The U.S. government along with the international community seized the opportunity to point the finger at the shadowy al-Qaeda group along with Muslim cleric Abu Bakar Ba’asyir as the culprits. In hindsight, it would appear that perhaps these individuals, given their apparent intimate knowledge of the perpetrators immediately following the bombing should have been included on the investigating team. Perhaps if they had we would know more than we do today, which is very little despite the volume of information (or disinformation) being vomited out by the spokesmen for the investigative teams on a daily basis.
    A creeping sense of foreboding began soon after the forensics people and other investigators (inclusive of Insp. Gen. I Made Pastika and his army of hundreds of supposedly top-notch investigators with virtually unlimited resources at their disposal) announced after only a week and a half that they were wrapping up their on-site work and retreating to the labs to analyze their findings. Astounding work, as it must have set a world record for crime scene forensic analysis.
    Given the scope of the bombing and the sheer size of the primary and secondary blast areas – where trace from a plethora of different explosive compounds were swabbed from – this was a feat that escaped even the vaunted investigators working the World Trade Center crime scene in New York, who spent nearly a year literally sifting by hand for evidence at the site. It would appear that the teams on Bali possessed far superior skills and techniques … or was there something else responsible for their haste in wrapping up so quickly and then sending the rest of the evidence as quickly as possible to the bottom of the ocean off Bali?
    At this point in their investigation National Police Chief Gen. Da’i Bachtiar states for the record that “traces of a chemical powder used in the bomb” were found in the van allegedly used to transport the large device. What powder? Even a cursory examination of the crater and primary site immediately following the bombings would make this statement laughable were it not for the circumstances.
    If indeed the Mitsubishi L300 van was used in the large blast, the five-foot deep by twenty-foot wide crater indicates that it would have been completely vaporized, including the engine block which they apparently found intact – along with the victims who instantly vanished. Indeed, this begs the question: Where did the investigators obtain this evidence in relation to the crater? Is it possible that if the van survived the large blast it was because it was parked at the edge of the primary blast zone, packed with small amounts of all the explosives – whose traces were found at the sites – in order to throw off independent investigators?
    In addition, there is the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), allegedly signed jointly by the National Police and the international investigation team, specifically restricting the scope of the “investigation links” and prohibiting international inquiries. Could this at least partially explain why Pastika has continually stonewalled, intimidated and generally obstructed independent investigators during the course of their work?
    During the first weeks of the investigation, notables such as State Intelligence Agency (BIN) Chief Hendropriyono, Susilo Yudhoyono, Assembly Speaker Amien Rais and Pastika focused or pretended to focus on foreigners – without specifying “which” foreigners – who they said were behind the attack. Somehow this twisting, turning trail dried up and disappeared into thin air without explanation, along with the former retired Air Force Officer who allegedly confessed to police his involvement in the bombing and was then released. To this day his whereabouts remain unknown and police investigators either cannot or will not release any information on this man, an officer who was allegedly trained in America in explosives and is an incredible lead that should have been followed-up on aggressively and thoroughly. Why was it not?
    Are these the statements and actions of professional investigators – or the actions of individuals engaged in a cover-up? Let’s look at the myriad of explosive traces found at the site and subsequently cited individually off and on by investigators and police as “the explosive” used in th

  70. Though it will have very little impact on western sheeple watching CNN, the Islamic Republic of Iran Broadcasting Service issued a statement from its Damascus office on 15 January 2005, which reads in part: “A senior official at [the] Syrian information ministry condemned the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri on Monday, saying, ‘all over Syria the people are furious and angry over this criminal act and mad at its perpetrators.’
    The Ministry spokesman continued, “Syria continues its firm support for Lebanon, especially in such a tense situation in which enemies are determined to destabilize Lebanon’s tranquility and security, but, God-willing, they will never succeed” …”by killing the Lebanese political leaders, the enemies of Lebanon and Syria are trying to restore coarseness in Lebanon again”.
    Finally, the Syrian spokesman concluded, “Lebanon’s enemies are displeased with the Lebanese peoples’ victory against Zionist occupant forces and opposed to the establishment of tranquility in Lebanon that is playing an effective role in the region. So, by committing such terrorist and criminal acts they are trying to weaken Lebanon once again. The ultimate goal of these crimes is fulfillment of Israel’s desires and pushing forth their war-monger policies”.
    Bearing in mind that this blast was caused by a highly specialized micro-nuke sourced from Dimona in the Negev Desert, the Syrian spokesman was obviously correct. Early forensic examination indicates this critical nuclear weapon was from the same class and batch used on Bali during October 2002, in a murderous and blatant attempt to force Australians to believe in the entirely fictional “al Qaeda” and “Jemaah Islamiyah” alleged terrorist groups.
    Though the weapon on Bali instantly killed more than 100 Australians in the immediate vicinity of the Sari Club at Kuta Beach, it failed utterly in its primary mission of force-feeding fictional “terrorist groups” down the throats of unreceptive Australians. Nowadays the only people in Australia who believe that “al Qaeda” and “Jemaah Islamiyah” exist, are brainwashed members of the media, and corrupt political war criminals in Canberra.
    In an equally crude attempt to ‘false flag’ the Syrians as the culprits in this latest deadly tableau, the western media started quoting the White House, which nowadays merely acts as a propaganda office for the Zionist Cabal in New York: “The White House described it as a brutal murder and said Lebanon should be allowed to pursue its political future “free from violence… and free from Syrian occupation”.
    To understand fully why Rafik Hariri and fourteen of his staff and colleagues were suddenly vaporized by a nuclear weapon placed under Beirut’s gleaming Corniche, we first need to examine why this small country is so important to Zionist Jews, and how the Lebanon has been undermined and attacked by Zionist terrorists in the past. In particular, we need to examine why Rafik Hariri, plus the religious and secular heads of Hezbollah, were all sentenced to death by Jewish war criminals more than twenty years ago.
    Zionist Jews have never concealed their plans for a “Greater Israel” stretching from the Mediterranean Sea in the west to Persia’s Abadan in the east. How to get hold of this real estate was not a problem for these madmen, who were and still are living in a time warp, where the antics of Ghengis Khan apparently still constitute acceptable social behavior.
    Using the truly evil Babylonian Talmud ‘Bible’ as a war crimes guide, the Jews intended to force a beachhead in Palestine [achieved in 1948], then progressively rape and pillage their way north, south, and east through Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, northern Saudi Arabia and Iraq, eventually forming an eastern border beyond Kuwait and the Persian oilfields in Abadan. Regardless of the appalling human suffering along the way, this would give the Zionists complete control of Middle East oil, and thus control of the whole world. Well, that was the game plan, before it all started to go horribly wrong in September 2001.
    Despite the fact that Lebanon has no major oil reserves, this beautiful country had a very special role to play in the new “Greater Israel”, with a major clue being Beirut’s sixties reputation as the Paris of the Middle East. Back then it was a stunningly beautiful secular city, with pristine white beaches and a night club on every corner. In a single word, Beirut was drawn in on Zionist plans as “headquarters” for the Jewish criminal elite, who had absolutely no intention of getting their manicured hands dirty in the eastern desert oilfields.
    Like Roman Emperors of old, the criminal elite intended to sit by the beach eating bunches of ripe grapes, and then as dusk fell, humbly consult their Talmuds to see exactly how many small Lebanese boys and girls they were allowed to defile and sodomize during the long warm night ahead. As you might expect, the Talmud imposes no bag limit at all.
    All non-Jews [Goyim] were and still are available for the unrestricted sexual pleasure of the Jewish conquerors, a religious ‘law’ that, according to sworn witness statements, indicted war criminal Ariel Sharon later enforced more than two dozen times in the Lebanese Shatila and Sabra refugee camps, when he eagerly unzipped his flies and brutally sodomized helpless screaming children held down by his fellow criminals.
    The Zionists reasoned that capturing and suborning Lebanon would be as simple as a walk in the park, achieved by using cheap agent provocateurs to spark a religious war between Lebanon’s Muslims and Maronite Christians. All Tel Aviv had to do was sit tight and make sure a steady stream of weapons found their way to the Maronite Christians, who were as slavishly subservient to the Jews back then, as the Texan Southern Baptists are in America today.
    In the early 1970s, as a direct consequence of this deliberate Jewish provocation, Muslim and Christian differences in Lebanon grew more intense and difficulties arose over the presence of Palestinian refugees, most of whom arrived after the 1967 Arab-Israeli war and the orchestrated hostilities of Black September [a Mossad front] in 1970. Full-scale civil war broke out in Lebanon during April 1975. Finally, when the Zionists calculated that the organized chaos had reached a peak, they invaded Lebanon in 1982 to claim their new headquarters.

    Like the good Zionist servants that they are, various officials in Washington kept prattling on relentlessly, and ratcheting up the pressure against Syria. By Wednesday morning Washington had “recalled our ambassador to Syria for urgent consultations prompted by the ‘heinous’ assassination of Lebanese former prime minister Rafik Hariri.”
    Washington stopped short of directly pointing the finger at Syria this time, but expressed to Damascus its “deep concern as well as our profound outrage over this heinous act of terrorism”, State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said.
    US officials said they were consulting with members of the UN Security Council on a response to the bombing and mulling additional sanctions against Syria if it did not resolve US complaints over a range of issues.
    Boucher said Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice “has decided to recall the US ambassador to Syria, Margaret Scobey, for urgent consultations following the brutal murder of former Lebanese prime minister Rafik Hariri.”
    Spokesman Boucher did not call the move a downgrading of ties, but said there was no timeframe for when Scobey would return to Damascus where she delivered a message of the United States’ anger on Monday night and Tuesday morning.
    As usual, the Zionist Jews and American officials have all developed historical amnesia, and are once again indulging themselves in hallucinations about overwhelming American firepower, and the mistaken belief that they can defeat anyone at any time.
    When Sharon and his mass murderers retreated south from Beirut to Palestine in 1985, it was not because they just felt like going home to Tel Aviv for a coffee break. The Zionist Jews were driven out of Lebanon by a vastly superior military force called the Hezbollah, and no amount of exaggerated war stories will change the harsh reality that the Zionist Jews were outflanked, out maneuvered, and comprehensively beaten on all fronts.
    During the twenty years that have passed since then, Zionist forces in Palestine have shrunk in size while Hezbollah has more than doubled its operational strength. Syria has been rearmed with state-of-the-art Russian weapon systems, which to a large extent have now been integrated with the Lebanese Army and Hezbollah.
    The bottom line is that the Zionist Jews in Palestine are now operating largely on smoke and mirrors, with only a handful of micro nukes left for theatrical effect. Yes, Rafik Hariri was a good man who Lebanon could ill afford to lose at a critical juncture in history like this, but ultimately his murder will make no difference to the performance of the massive heavily armed Arab juggernaut, when it finally decides to move south-east and crush that puny twenty-two foot concrete wall around Tel Aviv.

    Lebanese Army General Proves Bomb Was Pre-positioned Underground

    LEBANON 19 February 2005:

    “The bomb was placed underground, especially (since) the crater was so huge,” said Hisham Jaber, a retired brigadier general and former professor at the Lebanese Military and Staff Command College. “Even a car with 1,000 kilograms (2,200 pounds) of TNT wouldn’t create such a crater.”
    Jaber, who inspected the assassination site but is not part of the investigation, said a suicide attack was the least likely cause of the explosion. He noted the crater was near the middle of the road, indicating the bomb was likely placed under the street and not in a parked car.
    Suspicion that the bomb was under the street increased Friday when the chief military investigator demanded that police investigate recent road works in the area. Jaber said that although Hariri’s motorcade had equipment to jam electronic transmissions, the device could have been circumvented by a wire-triggered bomb or a counter-device placed in a nearby vehicle.

    Unfortunately for the Jewish invaders, close neighbor Syria decided to help Lebanon resist these rampant war criminals, which was extremely ominous behavior. Though the Zionists had been sure that Lebanon would jealously guard their own territory and thus order Syria to stay well clear, Lebanon did the reverse, and welcomed the well armed Syrian relief troops with open arms.
    Mistakenly believing it had been asked to help, the Americans used the USS Missouri to lob massive 16′ naval shells at the Syrians, but were rebuked by the Zionists for their spontaneous efforts. Unfortunately the Americans and the French were not listening properly, and continued to disobey explicit Jewish instructions to butt out of this particular firefight.
    In the end, the frustrated Jewish terrorists were circumstantially obliged to nuke the American and French marine barracks in Beirut, which finally got their belated attention. America and France left Lebanon.
    It was then [with Iran providiing partial funding via Damascus], that Hezbollah was formed specifically to drive the Jewish invaders out of Lebanon. So, take careful note here, Hezbollah was formed as a highly trained counter-insurgency army to drive the illegal Jewish insurgents out of its own sovereign Lebanese territory, in the same way that Republican Guard counter-insurgency units are slowly but surely driving illegal American, British and Australian insurgents out of Iraq.
    Hezbollah, the Republican Guard, and to a lesser extent Hamas and Islamic Jihad, are genuine counter-insurgency forces attempting to rid their own countries of illegal invaders, so cannot under any circumstances be described as ‘terrorists’ or ‘insurgents’. The only terrorists and insurgents in the Middle East today are Zionist Jews, Americans, Britons and Australians.
    Back in the eighties the massed forces of the Lebanese Muslims and Syrian Army in Beirut proved too much for the Jewish invaders, who were forced to withdraw during 1985, carrying out horrifying war crimes against local Lebanese civilians as they retreated back towards occupied Palestine.
    Naturally enough, when the Jews finally withdrew, Beirut, the old ‘Paris of the East’ was a smoking ruin, with barely a brick left standing. The most beautiful city in the Middle East had been reduced to rubble by the machinations of maniacs trying to emulate Ghengis Khan. There was also the possibility that these same maniacs might one day attempt to return, so the Arab nations of the Middle East, in concert with Iran, put their heads together in order to find a way of ensuring Lebanese national security.
    By the early nineties, two huge income streams were entering Lebanon. The first stream was from Iran via Damascus, and used primarily to pay and equip Hezbollah units, and to fund Syrian military personnel stationed in Lebanon to reinforce Hezbollah. The second less obvious income stream was from Saudi Arabia, to be spent specifically on Lebanese military infrastructure and the complete rebuilding of beautiful Beirut. The man put in charge of the Saudi side of the business was Rafik Hariri, nuked by the Jews on Monday.

  71. And again, as a post script, aren’t nuclear weapons (as they have been employed in the cold war) principally “terror” weapons? What is the point of a nuclear weapon if no one knows that that’s what it is? Unless we are entering a new era where the principle use (or threat of use) of nukes is no longer simply to use threats to terrorize, but actually to use these things tactically, in which case it makes sense to keep their “nuclear” character concealed. This story needs some follow up information.

  72. Ross
    Radiation yield on these nukes is supposedly very low
    The nukes that have put out for years now in secret have characteristics few scientists imagine
    bob nichols confirmed that the US was using nukes in iraq and afghanistan
    bob and dimitri are experts, work in the field and are honest and credible
    i am not an expert
    but…you are right…we will do dimitri again and talk about radiation
    his point is that we cover it up
    think there are places in iraq where radiation levels are 38 times that of hiroshima

  73. Ed
    then the fault is mine
    these were nukes
    if you are willing to believe the cover story…you are very gullible…
    that part of the fault is yours
    we are talking tons of science..physics here
    much of it secret
    and..incidents that we saw nothing of…and were misinformed on
    beirut…i was always told was something else…
    others…i knew nothing about
    it has taken me some time…much as with you….to see the point dimitri makes
    when you debunk conventional explosives…and he has…then nothing else is left.

  74. Like JFK, and Katyn, Smolensk, there will be no ‘911 truth’ -that’s how they do it. (Pennsylvania 911 crash had no bodies, Smolensk had maybe four? -unverified, no decent photos, but not 100 bodies)

    Harari may die waiting for trial or retire to Argentina after a fake execution. TPTB will say ‘we live in a society of laws’

  75. I have no doubt that the “military” has many bombs whose yields and characteristics which many people, even in the military, are not familiar with. Do we really jump to the conclusion that these bombs were “nuclear” (which can mean MANY things) on the word of some ex-Soviet? What kind of “nuclear” are we talking? Were these fission bombs, which the reference to Hiroshima suggests? Or some new kind of “mini” thermonuclear device? Are we talking Uranium, Plutonium, or some other fissile element not previously known to be useful in a bomb? The apparent lack of fallout suggests not. Gordon, are we really just supposed to take someone’s WORD on this? The story offers NO evidence of anything whatsoever except an “unconventional” yield on “conventional” (i.e. no detectable nuclear fallout) explosions. Where is the corroboration? Where are hypothetical “specs” on these devices? Where’s the beef? Occam’s maxim applies here: the explosions were much bigger than what we were told, obviously; is it more likely these blasts employed a highly energetic, yet still conventional (i.e. non-nuclear) material not widely known outside of military circles, or that they are some kind of “mini” “nuke” which fantastically and miraculously has none of the tell tales of a nuclear blast? And then what would be the point? Why not just pack a Rider to the rafters? It would presumably be cheaper than some sophisticated “micronuke” right? Of course we know these people have unlimited means, and these could have been sophisticated tests I suppose. What we can say for sure is that now there are rumors floating out there about “mini-nukes” which we must presume are undetectable by standard radiometric means. Seems like a pretty sweet tool to keep people running around like chickens with their heads cut off. Gordon, seeing as you felt compelled to post this article, which seems to me rather specious, I think it is now incumbent on you to provide some corroboration, or bring this “KHALEZOV” to the fore and have him account for this alleged information, respectfully.

  76. Joe Vialls was right about micronukes, AKA “Party Nukes”.

    Little mistake? :

    “Defense Special Weapons Agency concluded that the power of the bomb was actually closer to 20,000 pounds of TNT.(100 tons)”

    100 tons on TNT = 200,000 lbs, not 20,000 lbs.
    20,000 lbs of TNT = 10 tons; not 100 tons

    Re 911, it really doesn’t change the story if “party nukes” were used in conjunction with super thermite which is highly likely, “the mossad did 911, it is 100% CERTAIN, PERIOD”, as Alan Sabrosky said. The super thermite is much more easily traceable, so the guilty parties would like to refute the super thermite evidence, of course.

    That mossad used micro nukes at Kohbar Towers on our F-15 Wing doesn’t change the fact that mossad has been killing American troops all along, as stated by Joe Vialls and, both of which sources have been “wiped” by mossad run CIA.


  77. Bomb technology has advanced like all other forms of technology. The public is not “privy” as to exactly what kind of bombs they are. We have “fat free” salad dressimg, sugar without the sugar, and electronic cigarettes with the nicotine and not the tar. Why not a “nuke” without the radiation.

  78. Well, conventionally YES>> There should be radiation.
    According to the standard beliefs about Nuclear Blasts and effects.

    However times have changed. Since the 1950’s the US government has embarked on an adventure known as Project PlowSHARE, which basically developed high yield blasts with low radioactive counts. Over 60 years of experiments and implementation of R+ D has resulted in what we see today. Minimal radioactive devices that project maximum destruction sanitization. Was there radiation counts measured at the dumpsites of the 9-11 steel?

    SURE WAS =
    Elevated levels of RADIUM found at fresh kills dumpsite. Also across much of Manhattan especially the NY Israeli embassy:



    Much of the evidence of contamination has been swept under the carpet. ESPECIALLY concerning the DUMPED emergency vehicles. Many of which were never even scratched during 9-11 yet dumped as if they were toxically contaminated.

  79. well,, Conventionally YES>>> There should be radiation.
    According to the standard beliefs about Nuclear Blasts and effects.

    However times have changed. Since the 1950’s the US government has embarked on an adventure known as Project PlowSHARE, which basically developed high yield blasts with low radioactive counts. Over 60 years of experiments and implementation of R+ D has resulted in what we see today. Minimal radioactive devices that project maximum destruction sanitization. Was there radiation counts measured at the dumpsites of the 9-11 steel?

    SURE WAS =
    Elevated levels of RADIUM found at fresh kills dumpsite. Also across much of Manhattan especially the NY Israeli embassy:



    Much of the evidence of contamination has been swept under the carpet. ESPECIALLY concerning the DUMPED emergency vehicles. Many of which were never even scratched during 9-11 yet dumped as if they were toxically contaminated.

  80. ‘The Marine and French barracks in Lebanon were destroyed by two variable yield nuclear weapons, each set to 10 kilotons, roughly half the size of the nuclear weapon that destroyed Hiroshima.’
    But not half the damage, sorry just not convinced.
    Is this just more miss-information to screw with our heads

  81. Ron Paul has a point Gordon.Split an atom and you get lots of radiation.You have to be careful that you are possibly being set up with false flag information.

    Dimitri needs to expalain where the radiation went,since it has a half life of many thousnands of years.

  82. Where is the radio active fallout? Do these mini nukes not contain any radio active elements? Seems like BS to me.

  83. Regarding Oklahoma City: Youtube videos of LOCAL news reports from Oklahoma City reported at least two other unexploded bombs, that local officials confirmed to the local news stations, but…

    Then POOF! No unexploded bombs and no explanation about them, at all.

    And, positively, no national reportage of these unexploded bombs, period.

    Unconfirmed reports claim that the unexploded bombs were micro-nukes, and that’s why everybody went silent, and, the bombs “never existed” as reported by the national news media.

    A doctor reported a patient who was a First Responder at Oklahoma City that allegedly had a rash which was consistent with radiation burns.

    Do I think we have a cancer of crisis proportions regarding false flag attacks?

    You damned right I do!

    And, it’s a bi-partisan cancer — bet on that.

  84. I found a link to Demitri’s interview videos several weeks ago and watched them all (very long) and came away convinced re. nukes at the WTC. Very happy to see him here at VT as a staff writer!

  85. It so looks like Oklahoma City, i’ve heard about the radiation suppression regarding the WTC but,
    what do you think it is here?? How was the radiation level suppressed enough not to be noticed???
    Or is the news completely closed from here?

    We’re there we have all the necessary evidence to force the government to stand down. They are
    fraudulent to the very core. Nothing, Nothing whatsoever that they have done has been legal,

    To Kerguelen with them

  86. Was a shaped charge used to create the hole in the Pentagon?

    From an article:

    So what other possibilities could there be for a hole which has these unique characteristics. I have previous with experience in shape charge warheads, and anyone with this experience would immediately recognize the hole to match that caused by a shaped charge warhead or device.

    The C-ring exit hole has these distinct features, which would have occurred if this wall was struck by some sort of shaped charge:
    1. The hole is circular as the typical shaped charge warhead is round.
    2. The hole is cleanly cut, in that the walls surrounding the hole do not appear to have suffered any visible forces as would be expected from the extremely localized and focused energy from the shaped charge warhead.
    3. Windows are broken outside of the C-ring exit hole. Shock waves from the shaped charge high explosive are strong enough to break typical glass (but not a reinforced brick wall).
    4. The wall beyond the C-ring (towards the interior of the Pentagon) is relatively undamaged, only some light charring. The force of the shaped charge warhead is extremely localized and focused and would have dissipated shortly after it breached the C-Ring wall.

    What is a shape charge? In simple terms it is high explosives formed in a very specific geometry so that the explosive force is extremely focused. Some good general information is located here . Look at the hole in reinforced concrete hole here
    You can see how the wall is undamaged except for the hole; also note how the rebar is cut.

    So how did a shaped charged warhead get this far into the Pentagon? One possible explanation is a multi stage shaped charge warhead device. I do not propose that the following device was used at the Pentagon, but one such multi stage device is described here.

    A page or so into this site describes “a weapon called a PAM, or Penetration Augmented Munition”. “Although compact and lightweight (approximately 35 pounds, 33 inches long), it contains the power of four explosive charges and when deployed, can effectively destroy bridges, runways, roads, and tunnels”. It describes a technology where multiple shaped charges are used together, where the first charge creates a hole for a second, and so forth. The successive charges can be set off by separate sensors which detect the impact with a wall.

    If you were to design a “bunker buster” warhead where you had to penetrate multiple reinforced walls, this would be technology to utilize, to allow you to penetrate further into a multi walled structure than with a single shape charge warhead alone. Due to the lack of walls between the exterior E-ring wall and the C ring wall, it is likely that such a device would travel until it hit a support column. Hitting a support column at an angle could serve to deflect slightly the trajectory of the device. Following this theory, the last charge struck the C-ring wall and created the C-Ring exit hole. Having the device follow a deflect path would also explain how there were still support columns in the direct path of the aircraft to the C-Ring exit hole.

    If something smaller than a 757 hit the Pentagon, a multi stage shape charge may have been part of the payload to increase the damage into the building, to better approximate the damage that would be envisioned by a larger 757. A shaped charge warhead would seem to be the only explanation that fits the evidence of a sudden increase in damage to the Pentagon near the C-Ring exit hole and the C-ring exit hole itself.

    The only explanations offered by the “official” community, the “circle of energy” and the “shock wave theory”, have no precedent, and violate some basic common sense and physics. My proposal fits the classic shape charge damage seen from a typical shaped charge warhead. The first time I saw the C-Ring exit hole, a chill went down my spine because I knew that the only way to cut a clean hole in a reinforced brick wall (including cutting through rebar) is with a shaped charge warhead. With any type impact or wave, forces would have caused the wall to crumble or cave in, without cutting through rebar.

    If anybody has expertise with shaped charges, comments would be appriciated.

    Yes, I believe a large plane hit the Pentagon. I know, it’ not a popular theory these days. Oh well. I think it’s OK if we disagree on this issue.

  87. Ron Paul, I have the same question.

    BTW, A very good article on the Oklahoma City bombing:

    It seems to have been a false flag. Why was it done? Some say to discredit the militia movement. Some say it was originally planned to blame Saddam Hussein.

    Is there a Dimitri Khalezov biography on the Web. I couldn’t find one. I’m just curious.

    From an article: Dimitri Khalezov explains about the nuclear-tipped “Granit” missile with 500 kiloton warhead used in the Pentagon attack.

    I DON’T BELIEVE IT. If Gordon can use capital letters so can I. 🙂

    I’m posting this again:

    Besides the abundance of evidence I would like you and everyone else who believes a missile hit the Pentagon to think about the planning of the false flag.

    Do you really believe the plan would include a fly over of a passenger plane that hundreds of people would see and then hope some of the witnesses don’t see the plane fly away from the Pentagon?

    The plan included forcing the air traffic controllers, who watched the plane at the Pentagon on their radar screens, lie and state they didn’t see the plane fly away from the Pentagon? It’s a ridiculous plan. Did the plan include a technique for making the plane invisible?

    If you look at my links there are photographs of the plane wreckage including the tail. Did the plan include dragging out fake plane wreckage with a vast number of Pentagon employees and other people at the scene who might witness the process? Also the people involved in the staged event may in the future talk to a reporter about what really happened. An absurd plan.

    Some people actually believe there was no plane wreckage at the scene, thus the plan was to use a missile, tell everyone that a plane hit the Pentagon and provide no plane wreckage at the scene of a major crime scene. That’s a ridiculous plan.

    The plan included convincing people at the Pentagon to lie and state they saw a plane flying very low at the Pentagon and smacking the Pentagon. It’s a lousy plan.

    The planners hoped that nobody would notice a missile soaring across the sky. If you have evidence it’s impossible for humans to see the missile which they supposedly used please provide it.

    The plan included getting rid of the plane and its passengers by perhaps dumping it in the ocean and hope no air traffic controllers figured out what happened. It’s very risky.

    The plan supposedly included identifying all but one passenger with forensics and hope that the applicable people involved with this portion of the investigation go along with the charade. That’s very risky.

    The planners decided to take their chances that government experts would’t notice the signs of a missile strike or would lie. That’s very risky.

    If you look at it from a planning perspective it’s extremely unlikely they used a missile. It’s a lousy, highly risky plan. The plan would never have been approved.

    It would have been substantially less risky to put explosives in the plane or place explosives in the Pentagon. That portion of the Pentagon was renovated shortly before 911. They could have easily put explosives in the building, which may have actually happened. It’s hard to believe a plane made out of lightweight material could have created the damage done at the Pentagon. The hole could have been created by a stout engine but I’m not sure.

    In conclusion, nobody would have made such a ridiculous, highly risky plan.

    For those that don’t think a 757 could have made the maneuvers think about a plane swap.


Comments are closed.