This book was finally published in 1956, and the author, Douglas Reed, closed out the detailed world history and the threat of “Destructive “Talmudism with this line:
“I believe the Jews of the world are equally beginning to see the error of revolutionary Zionism, the twin of the other destructive movement, and, as this century ends, will decide to seek involvement in mankind.”
Throughout this detailed, utterly documented and exhaustive history of civilization, Reed pointed out clearly that many Jews were the implacable enemies of Zionism, and were thereby crushed without mercy.
Talk about beginning at the beginning:
“The true start of this affair occurred on a day in 458 BC, which this narrative will reach in its sixth chapter. On that day the petty Palestinian tribe of Judah (earlier disowned by the Israelites) produced a racial creed, the disruptive effect of which on subsequent human affairs may have exceeded that of explosives or epidemics. This was the day on which the theory of the master-race was set up as “the Law”. At the time Judah was a small tribe among the subject-peoples of the Persian king, and what today is known as “the West” could not even be imagined. Now the Christian era is nearly two thousand years old and “Western civilization”, which grew out of it, is threatened with disintegration. The creed born in Judah 2,500 years ago, in the author’s opinion, has chiefly brought this about. The process, from original cause to present effect, can be fairly clearly traced because the period is, in the main, one of verifiable history.”
Those of us today are not conditioned to think so clearly on the true beginning of this destructive power, because we are taught that the”Old Testament” simply precedes and establishes the New in our reading of The Bible. Reed points out this was fatal error, because the Talmud usurped whatever may have been Revelation from God and converted it into a filthy, racist, abominable work of men, who sought only power and the destruction of others.
Gospel preachers today tell the biographies of Jesus without delineating who his mortal enemies were other than Pharisees and scribes in the temple. We are seldom told about the Talmudist Pharisees in detail, and even when admonished famously by Jesus as hypocrites and liars, preachers do not delve into what the “Sanhedrin” really was. Christians want the philosophy of love and salvation, they have seldom in these centuries since hungered for the evil details of Christ’s persecution. I for one never had a “bible study” that explained the power of the “jews” at that time in a true historical perspective; perhaps if we Christians were preached the whole story, we would not have been such dupes throughout western history. Those last thoughts here are mine not necessarily the author’s.
From the beginning with the mysterious tribe of Judah, until today’s quaking world and a nation called Israel is what this history covers. We learn that the very name “Israel” is a Talmudic con Job, because the Biblical Israel ceased to exist about 2500 years ago; and had absolutely nothing to do with today’s “shitty little country.”
I admit to having a big problem with the writers version of ancient history early on, but I am likely one of very few who would react this way. It is because, I have learned to be an implacable enemy of the cult of “British Israel”snd the “Destiny” crowd, who want so badly to be powerful Jews, they have adopted a racial philosophy based on the mythology of the “Lost tribes”The entire premise is false, just as the Talmud is entirely false.
Recently on the Internet I found this statement about the Talmud:
“It would be impossible to find less wisdom, less eloquence, and less high morality, imbedded in a vaster bulk of what is utterly valueless to mankind — to say nothing of those parts of it which are indelicate and even obscene — in any other national literature of the same extent.”
That may be attributed to an Internet favorite Henry Mankow
Not long ago prior to the dawn of the blogger. One never saw or heard about the Talmud, and for good reason, who in their right mind would claim it?
The greatest value of Reed’s detailed research is clearly shown in his weaving the facts behind the manipulations of the American and British governments by the modern Sanhedrin of International Talmudist Elders: On today’s issue of War powers, Reed points to the notorious “Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” about which he gives detaled historical background:
“This forecast of 1905 or earlier particularly deserves Lord Sydenham’s tribute of “deadly accuracy”. American presidents in the two wars of this century have acted as here shown. They did take the right of declaring and making war, and it has been used at least once (in Korea) since the Second World War ended; any attempt in Congress or outside to deprive them of this power, or curb them in the use of it meets with violently hostile attack.
“American presidents in the two wars of this century have acted as here shown. They did take the right of declaring and making war, and it has been used at least once (in Korea) since the Second World War ended; any attempt in Congress or outside to deprive them of this power, or curb them in the use of it meets with violently hostile attack.
“So the Protocols continue. The peoples, on their progress “from one disenchantment to another”, will not be allowed “a breathing-space”. Any country “which dares to oppose us” must be met with war, and any collective opposition with “universal war”. The peoples will not be allowed “to contend with sedition” (here is the key to the furious attacks of the 1790s, 1920 and today on all demands for “investigation”, “Witch-hunting”, “McCarthyism” and the like). In the Super-State to come the obligation will fall on members of one family to denounce dissidents within the family circle (the Old Testamentary dispensation earlier mentioned). The “complete wrecking of the Christian religion” will not be long delayed. The peoples will be kept distracted by trivial amusements (“people’s palaces”) from becoming troublesome and asking questions. History will be rewritten for their delusion (another precept since fulfilled in communized Russia), for “we shall erase from the memory of men all facts of previous centuries which are undesirable to us, and leave only those which depict all the errors of the national governments”. “All the wheels of the machinery of all States go by the force of the engine, which is in our hands, and that engine of the machinery of States is Gold”.
“And the end of it all: “What we have to get at is that there should be in all the States of the world, beside ourselves, only the masses of the proletariat, a few millionaires devoted to our interests, police and soldiers. . . The recognition of our despot. . .will come when the peoples, utterly wearied by the irregularities and incompetence. . .of their rulers, will clamor: ‘Away with them and give us one king over all the earth who will unite us and annihilate the causes of discords, frontiers, nationalities, religions, State debts, who will give us peace and quiet, which we cannot find under our rulers and representatives.”
From that statement alone it is easy to understsnd why the powerful Talmudists fought so long and so hard to discredit the protocols.
To me, a history buff, so to speak, the revealing chapters in Reed’s massive tomb. explained political manipulation, and how it is done; when he described the “advice”given to Harry Truman that led the president to go against public pressure and literally establish Israel as a nation, Reed told how it came about during election campaigns where the closest advisors are never statesmen, but easily dominated political creatures. Reed’s coverage of the sorry Truman business as well as the sickening manipulations of Woodrow Wilson, along with a detailed history of the mysterious Col. Mandell House are vital reading; not to mention the most thorough coverage of the Balfour Declaration one will find anywhere..
For good measure let me toss in some other pithy jewels
“Republicanism, too, is to be a “cover” for the conspiracy. The Protocols are especially contemptuous of republicanism, in which (and in liberalism) they see the weapon of self-destruction forged out of “the mob”: “. . . then it was that the era of republics became possible of realization; and then it was that we replaced the ruler by a caricature of a government, by a president, taken from the mob, from the midst of our puppet creatures, our slaves. This was the foundation of the mine which we have laid under the peoples”.
Today, we may consider those interminable polls to be the “mob” of the protocols.
Read: The Controversy of Zion