Palestinian Statehood: The Ayes And The Nays (Updated)

35
944

John Pilger details the war in Palestine through interviews of Palestinian and Israelis. It details the progress of peace and the strategies and policies at work on both sides of the issue

 

by Debbie Menon

 

Watch the program by John Pilger

 

Source of John Pilger’s Film: gisfilms.org

John Pilger, renowned investigative journalist and documentary film-maker, is one of only two journalists to have twice won British journalism’s top award; his documentaries have won academy awards in both the UK and the US. In a New Statesman survey of the 50 heroes of our time, Pilger came fourth behind Aung San Suu Kyi and Nelson Mandela.

Countries that support the recognition of a Palestinian state:

A partial listing of the Ayes, as of July 2011…


# Name Date of recognition





  1. Algeria 15 November 1988
  2. Bahrain 15 November 1988
  3. Iraq 15 November 1988
  4. Kuwait 15 November 1988
  5. Libya 15 November 1988
  6. Malaysia 15 November 1988
  7. Mauritania15 November 1988
  8. Morocco 15 November 1988
  9. Somalia 15 November 1988
  10. Tunisia 15 November 1988
  11. Turkey 15 November 1988
  12. Yemen 15 November 1988
  13. Afghanistan 16 November 1988
  14. Bangladesh 16 November 1988
  15. Cuba 16 November 1988
  16. Indonesia 16 November 1988
  17. Jordan 16 November 1988
  18. Madagascar 16 November 1988
  19. Malta 16 November 1988
  20. Nicaragua 16 November 1988
  21. Pakistan 16 November 1988
  22. Qatar 16 November 1988
  23. Saudi Arabia 16 November 1988
  24. United Arab Emirates 16 November 1988
  25. Serbia 16 November 1988
  26. Zambia 16 November 1988
  27. Albania 17 November 1988
  28. Brunei 17 November 1988
  29. Djibouti 17 November 1988
  30. Mauritius 17 November 1988
  31. Sudan 17 November 1988
  32. Cyprus 18 November 1988
  33. Czech Republic 18 November 1988
  34. Slovakia 18 November 1988
  35. Egypt 18 November 1988
  36. India 18 November 1988
  37. Nigeria 18 November 1988
  38. Seychelles 18 November 1988
  39. Sri Lanka 18 November 1988
  40. Belarus 19 November 1988
  41. Guinea 19 November 1988
  42. Namibia 19 November 1988
  43. Ukraine 19 November 1988
  44. Russia 19 November 1988
  45. Vietnam 19 November 1988
  46. China, People’s Republic of 20 November 1988
  47. Burkina Faso 21 November 1988
  48. Comoros 21 November 1988
  49. Guinea-Bissau 21 November 1988
  50. Mali 21 November 1988
  51. Cambodia 21 November 1988
  52. Mongolia 22 November 1988
  53. Senegal 22 November 1988
  54. Hungary 23 November 1988
  55. Cape Verde 24 November 1988
  56. Korea, North 24 November 1988
  57. Niger 24 November 1988
  58. Romania 24 November 1988
  59. Tanzania 24 November 1988
  60. Bulgaria 25 November 1988
  61. Maldives 28 November 1988
  62. Ghana 29 November 1988
  63. Togo 29 November 1988
  64. Zimbabwe 29 November 1988
  65. Chad 1 December 1988
  66. Laos 2 December 1988
  67. Sierra Leone 3 December 1988
  68. Uganda 3 December 1988
  69. Congo, Republic of the 5 December 1988
  70. Angola 6 December 1988
  71. Mozambique 8 December 1988
  72. São Tomé and Príncipe 10 December 1988
  73. Congo, Democratic Republic of the 10 December 1988
  74. Gabon 12 December 1988
  75. Oman 13 December 1988
  76. Poland 14 December 1988
  77. Botswana19 December 1988
  78. Nepal 19 December 1988
  79. Burundi 22 December 1988
  80. Central African Republic 23 December 1988
  81. Bhutan 25 December 1988
  82. Rwanda 2 January 1989
  83. Ethiopia 4 February 1989
  84. Iran 4 February 1989
  85. Benin May 1989 or before
  86. Equatorial Guinea May 1989 or before
  87. Gambia May 1989 or before
  88. Kenya May 1989 or before
  89. Lebanon May 1989 or before
  90. Vanuatu 21 August 1989
  91. Philippines September 1989
  92. Swaziland July 1991 or before
  93. Kazakhstan 6 April 1992
  94. Azerbaijan 15 April 1992
  95. Georgia 25 April 1992
  96. Bosnia and Herzegovina 27 May 1992
  97. Tajikistan 2 April 1994
  98. Uzbekistan 25 September 1994
  99. South Africa 15 February 1995
  100. Kyrgyzstan November 1995
  101. East Timor 1 March 2004
  102. Papua New Guinea 4 October 2004
  103. Paraguay 25 March 2005
  104. Montenegro 24 July 2006
  105. Costa Rica 5 February 2008
  106. Côte d’Ivoire 2008 or before
  107. Venezuela 27 April 2009
  108. Dominican Republic 14 July 2009
  109. Brazil 1 December 2010
  110. Argentina 6 December 2010
  111. Bolivia 22 December 2010
  112. Ecuador 24 December 2010
  113. Chile 7 January 2011
  114. Guyana 13 January 2011
  115. Peru 24 January 2011
  116. Suriname 1 February 2011
  117. Uruguay 15 March 2011
  118. Malawi 19 April 2011
  119. Lesotho 6 June 2011
  120. Syria 18 July 2011
  121. Liberia 2011
  122. Turkmenistan 2011 or before

List taken FROM

Be a part of Peace and Progress!!

HELP FILL IN THE MAP!

If your country is not on the list, urge your government to join in…. USA, Canada, Australia and Columbia in particular.

 

No one will be disenfranchised.

 

by Prof. Francis Boyle

Oxford University Professor Guy Goodwin-Gill prepared a legal opinion, claiming granting Palestine Statehood will result in the PLO losing its status. In addition, he said, diaspora refugees will be disenfranchised.

University of Illinois Law Professor Francis Boyle, former PLO legal advisor in drafting its 1988 Declaration of Independence discounted Goodwin-Gill’s concerns, saying he built explicit safeguards into the 1988 Declaration of Independence he drafted “to make sure that his doomsday scenario does not materialize.”


Boyle emailed the following comments in response to Goodwin-Gill’s opinion:

My Dear Palestinian Friends:

This Memo is based upon most erroneous assumptions. But in a nutshell, in the 15 November 1988 Palestinian Declaration of Independence that was approved by the PNC representing all Palestinians all over the world, the Executive Committee of the PLO was set up as the Provisional Government for the State of Palestine—pursuant to my advice.

In addition, the Declaration of Independence also provides that all Palestinians living around the world automatically become citizens of the State of Palestine—pursuant to my advice. So the Executive Committee of the PLO in its capacity as the Provisional Government for the State of Palestine will continue to represent the interests of all Palestinians around the world when Palestine becomes a UN Member State. Hence all your rights will be preserved: for all Palestinians and for the PLO. No one will be disenfranchised.

The PLO will not lose its status. This legal arrangement does not violate the Palestinian Charter, but was approved already by the PNC. Unfortunately, this professor is not aware of all the legal and constitutional technicalities that were originally built into the Palestinian Declaration of Independence to make sure that his doomsday scenario does not materialize–at my advice.

All of your rights have been protected and will be protected by Palestine becoming a Member State of the United Nations, including the Right of Return. Indeed, in the Memo I originally did for President Arafat and the PLO back in 1988, I explained how we could obtain UN Membership.

All of the advice that I gave to President Arafat and the PLO in 1987 to 1989 was originally premised on the assumption that someday we would apply for UN Membership. That day has come. Please move forward. I have been working for this Day since I first proposed UN Membership for Palestine along the lines of Namibia at the United Nations Headquarters in New York in June of 1987. Palestine’s Application for UN Membership was my idea.

When my Client and Dear Friend the late, great Dr. Haidar Abdul Shaffi Chair of the Palestinian Delegation to the Middle East Negotiations instructed me to draft the Palestinian counter-offer to the now defunct Oslo Agreement, he most solemnly told me:

“Professor Boyle, we have decided to ask you to draft this Interim Peace Agreement for us. Do whatever you want! But do not sell out our right to our State!”

And I responded to Dr. Haidar:

“Do not worry, Dr. Abdul Shaffi. As you know, I was the one who first called for the creation of the Palestinian State back at United Nations Headquarters in June of 1987, and then served as the Legal Adviser to the PLO on its creation. I will do nothing to harm it!”

As I promised Dr. Haidar, I would do nothing to harm Palestine and the Palestinians.


Francis A. Boyle, Professor of International Law Legal Advisor to the PLO and H.E. Yasser Arafat on the Palestinian Declaration of Independence. Legal Advisor to the Palestinian Delegation to the Middle Peace Negotiations (1991-1993) and H.E. Dr. Haidar Abdul Shaffi Author, Palestine, Palestinians and International Law (2003) and The Palestinian Right of Return under International Law (2011)

IN CONCLUSION:

Professor Mazin Qumsiyeh when asked weighs in:

The internet is abuzz about the September bid at the UN for an upgrade in the status of Palestine.  There are many arguments on all sides being presented.  Even international legal experts differ, Guy Goodwin-Gill holds a very negative opinion about going to the UN while Francis Boyle a very positive one (Abdullah Abu Eid, a Palestinian legal expert holds a somewhat intermediary position).  Some points are convincing to some of us and some not.  The discussions are getting intense but in actuality are coming a bit too late. It is not clear that the opinions offered will affect the course going forward since no mechanism exists for Mr. Mahmoud Abbas to seek and receive input in a democratic and open way.  What would have helped would be an open democratic decision making process at the PLO.  The Palestinian National Council should have been revived democratically as agreed to three times already in discussions between the factions.  If the PNC had been constituted, a real discussion among Palestinians would have happened that address these existential issues like whether to go to the UN or not and more importantly how to move before and after such events to ensure success regardless of the decision we collectively make.  No real discussion of these issues was possible or allowed in the structure of Oslo.  It is that lack of rational and democratic decision making since Oslo (intentional) that really harms the cause of Palestine.


Prof. Mazin Qumsiyeh teaches and does research at Bethlehem and Birzeit Universities in occupied Palestine. He previously served on the faculties of the University of Tennessee, Duke and Yale Universities. He served on the board/steering/executive committees of a number of groups including Peace Action Education Fund, the US Campaign to End the Occupation, the Palestinian American Congress, Association for One Democratic State in Israel/Palestine, and BoycottIsraeliGoods.org. He is now president of the Palestinian Center for Rapprochement Between People. He advised many other groups including Sommerville Divestment Project, Olympia-Rafah Sister City Project, Palestine Freedom Project, Sabeel North America, and National Council of Churches of Christ USA. He is an active member of a number of human rights groups (Amnesty, Peace action, Human Rights Watch, ACLU etc.). He published several books of which the most acclaimed “Sharing the Land of Canaan: human rights and the Israeli/Palestinian Struggle” which was also translated to spanish. For more about his work go to: qumsiyeh.org

Also see:

 

Sources: Desert Peace / Veterans Today

 

Author Details
Debbie Menon is an independent writer based in Dubai. Her main focus are the US-Mid- East Conflicts. Her writing has been featured in several print and online publications. Her writing reflects the incredible resilience, almost superhuman steadfastness of the occupied and oppressed Palestinians, who are now facing the prospect of a final round of ethnic cleansing. She is committed to exposing Israel Lobbies control of ‘U.S. Middle East Policy. Control’ which amounts to treason by the Zionist lobbies in America and its stooges in Congress, and that guarantees there can never be a peaceful resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, only catastrophe for all, in the region and the world. Her mission is to inform and educate internet viewers seeking unfiltered information about real events on issues of the US/Middle East conflicts that are unreported, underreported, or distorted in the American media. PS: For those of her detractors that think she is being selective and even “one sided,” tough, that is the point of her work, to present an alternative view and interpretation of the US-Israel-Middle East conflict, that has been completely ignored in mainstream discourse. The purpose is to look at the current reality from a different and critical perspective, not to simply rehash the pro-US/Israel perspective, smoke and mirrors that has been allowed to utterly and completely dominate Mainstream discourse.
ATTENTION READERS
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

Comments are closed.