…by Jonas E. Alexis
In his recent work Breach of Trust, noted military historian and political scientist Andrew J. Bacevich of Boston University argues that
“Apart from a handful of deluded neoconservatives, no one believes that the United States accomplished its objectives in Iraq, unless the main objective was to commit mayhem, apply a tourniquet to staunch the bleeding, and then declare the patient stable while hastily leaving the scene of the crime.”
This is not just the assessment of an academic sitting behind his desk at an ivory-tower institution and making detached observation. Bacevich is a military man who lost his son in Iraq in 2007.
After graduating from West Point in 1969, Bacevich got accepted in the U.S. Army. He served his country in Vietnam, the Persian Gulf, and got retired from the army in the 1990s.
Bacevich has been saying since 2005 that the war in Iraq is “an unwinnable war.” The war is unwinnable largely because it was based on colossal lies. Soldier after soldier who went to Iraq to find weapons of mass destruction detailed the same thing. One soldier in particular, Justin LeHew, called the invasion “madness and chaos.”
In response to Jewish neoconservative Max Boot’s Machiavellian assertion that “Public apathy [toward war] presents a potential opportunity,” Bacevich declares,
“Apathy toward war is symptomatic of advancing civic decay, finding expression in apathy toward the blight of child poverty, homelessness, illegitimacy, and eating disorders also plaguing the country.
“Shrugging off wars makes it that much easier for Americans—overweight, overmedicated, and deeply in hock—to shrug off the persistence of widespread hunger, the patent failures of their criminal justice system, and any number of other problems.”
In short, what Boot ends us saying is that if Americans could care less about what is going on in the Middle East, if they can forget that perpetual wars will eventually breed perpetual suffering and the destructions of nations, Boot would be happy. As Bacevich puts it,
“The thread that binds together this pattern of collective anomie is plain to see: unless the problem you’re talking about affects me personally, why should I care?”
Put simply, Boot and other neo-Bolsheviks play an enormously powerful role in bringing about chaos and madness in America and the Middle East. In that sense, they are being consistent with Jewish subversive movements. As Jewish scholars Stanley Rothman and S. Robert Lichter put it more than two decades ago,
“In almost every country about which we have information, a segment of the Jewish community played a very vital role in movements designed to undermine the existing order. This was true even in the United States where Jews have achieved unparalleled economic, cultural, and social success.”
THE NEOCONS AND SAMSON
Boot’s Machiavellian tactic seems to relate to the story of Samson in the Old Testament. Samson’s enemies quickly realized that there was no way they could bring him down by brute force or military might. They therefore tried one of the highest forms of control ever discovered: spiritual or intellectual and psychological blindness. And psychological blindness will often include preying on other people’s sexual weakness.
Samson’s enemies quickly discovered that once your enemy is blind, then you can do whatever you want with him.
First, Samson’s enemies preyed on his sexual lust. He eventually fell into their traps and hence “He was no longer on the field of battle, but rather, to use Milton’s phrase, ‘eyeless in Gaza, grinding at the mill with slaves.’”
This was not the first time that sexual weakness was used as a form of psychological weapon. Euripides’ play The Bacchae can perhaps help us unravel some of the mystery here.
Pentheus, who is the king of Thebes in the play, observes that once Dionysus has unleashed sexual debauchery among the women in particular, the moral culture is doomed and sexual destruction ensues. The women usually perform their sexual rites on the mountainside, usually on Mount Parnassos above Delphi.
In an attempt to put an end to this moral decay, Pentheus plans to capture Dionysus, which he eventually did.
When Dionysus, the god of sexual excess and debauchery, was finally captured, he basically told Pentheus that he got Pentheus under his wings. How can Dionysus get me under his wings, reasons Pentheus, when I got him locked up?
To make a long story short, Dionysus asks Pentheus if he would like to see the women dance naked on the mountainside. Using our modern language to parody Pentheus, he responds by saying,
“An opportunity to look at naked women? Heck, yeah! What man would say no to that? As king of Thebes, it would pain me to see this and apply my moral judgment on those naked women, but it is a small price to pay. Let’s do this.”
Using the actual version, Pentheus says, “Aye, indeed! Lead on. Why should we tarry?…That would I, though it cost me all the gold of Thebes!”
Shocked by Pentheus’s lustful desires, Dionysus responded,
“So much? Thou art quick to fall to such great longing.”
Dionysus hinted that this would probably lead to Pentheus’s own death, but since his sexual lust was overshadowing everything else, including his own moral reasoning, Pentheus could not think straight.
In the end, Dionysus led Pentheus to the mountainside, and the naked women ended up tearing Pentheus apart, leading him to a tragic death.
Pentheus’ own mother, Agave, was also one of the women who participated in the Dionysian madness. Being intoxicated by the revelry and being possessed by Dionysus, she ripped off Pentheus’ head without knowing that it was her own son.
Pentheus got what he wanted, but it cost him his own life.
WEAPONIZING SEXUAL ENERGY
The enemy of Western civilization and any culture that upholds the moral and sexual order has been able to harness that sexual debauchery and unleash it in America through movies in particular.
But in order to get the big picture, let us go back to the Old Testament and see how sexual decadence ended up taking the lives of thousands of people right after the Hebrews got out of Egypt (see Numbers 25).
In Numbers 22 through 31, we find an interesting phenomenon. Balak, king of the Moabites, Israel’s enemy, tried unsuccessfully to have his sorcerer Balaam use divination to curse Israel. After many failed attempts, Balak became desperate.
Finally, when all hope had faded, Balaam told Balak that one way to bring down the people of Israel was to entice them into sexual debauchery and decadence. The book of Revelation later tells us that it was Balaam who “taught Balak to cast a stumblingblock before the children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed unto idols, and to commit fornication” (Revelation 2:14).
Sexual fornication is a quick way to fall into spiritual and psychological decadence, and the early church was reprimanded for this issue in the book of Revelation.
First-century Jewish historian Josephus cites Balaam saying to Balak,
“Do you therefore set out the handsomest of such of your daughters as are most eminent for beauty, and proper to force and conquer the modesty of those that behold them, and these decked and trimmed to the highest degree able.
“Then do you send them to be near camp [Israel’s camp], and give them in charge, that the young men of the Hebrews…
“When they see they are enamored of them, let them take leaves; and if they entreat them to stay, let them give their consent till they have persuaded them to leave off their obedience to their own laws, the worship of that God who established them, to worship the gods of the Midianites and by this means God will be angry at them.”
Josephus says that when the Israelites began to be blinded by lust and sexual immorality, they “fell into sedition” and became the “slaves” of the Midianite women, doing whatever the Midianite women asked them to do, including making pagan sacrifices to the gods of the Midianites.
“Once the youth had tasted of these strange customs, they went with insatiable inclinations into them; and even where some of the principal men were illustrious on account of the virtues of their fathers, they also were corrupted together with the rest.”
Aquinas would later say that lust makes one blind, and this was clearly the case with the Israelites when they got enticed in what was later called the affair of Peor. Commentator Matthew Henry declared that “Israel’s sin did that which all Balaam’s enchantments [sorcery and magic] could not do.”
Other commentators declared that Baal-Peor was the god of prostitution, “in honour of whom women and virgins prostituted themselves.”
In other words, sexual debauchery is more powerful than magic or enchantment or sorcery. Thousands of years later, Jewish cultist Anton LaVey harnessed that sexual power and turned it into a real cultural revolution in the late 1960s and 1970s in America, which explicitly called for a subversion of Christianity and the moral order.
Like Sigmund Freud and Wilhelm Reich before him, and like David Cronenberg and Al Goldstein after him, LaVey thought that people need to be released from the cage of Christian morals. In the process, morality was replaced with sexual liberation and perversion.
LaVey’s organization was the first group among many to revive sexual magic that had been dead for a long time in much of the West, most particularly in America.
Put simply, lust, political blindness, and sexual seduction can be used—and have been used—as psychological weapons in covert wars. How else could you explain David Cronenberg’s movies such as Cosmopolis, A Dangerous Method, Eastern Promises, A History of Violence, etc.?
Let us hear from the filmmaker himself:
“Yes. I´m putting art in opposition to religion—or as a replacement of religion, in the sense that if religion is used to allow you to come to terms with death, and also to guide you how to live your life, then I think that art can do the same thing. But in a much less schematic way, in a much less rigid and absolute way.”
Having been influenced by William S. Burroughs—a writer who shot his wife, flirted with black magic, and who became possessed while writing some of his major works such as Naked Lunch—Cronenberg wrote, “Whenever I kill someone in my films I’m really rehearsing my own death.”
Pornography, then, is no longer an abstract principle as in Freud’s psychoanalysis, but is a psychological weapon aimed at the heart of Western culture and those who embrace the moral order. As Al Goldstein, former publisher and founder of the pornographic magazine Screw, put it,
“The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks.”
This brings us to a crucial point in our discussion: the art world is bound to be degraded if and when it is governed by an ideology that seeks to subvert the moral order. Israel Shamir attributes this to the rejection of Christ, for Christ, says Shamir, is “the main fountain of creativity…There is no visual art or poetry outside of God; at best, a godless person can imitate art.”
It was only a matter of time before the art world was used as a weapon against Christ:
“A photograph of a crucifix in a container of urine, entitled Piss Christ, was exhibited in the Whitney Museum, which is headed by a great friend of [former Israeli Prime Minister] Ariel Sharon, a member of Mega, Leonard Lauder.”
In 2011 Israeli TV released a video near Easter which explicitly blasphemed and mocked the crucifixion of Christ, saying, “Yeshu [Jesus] was an enemy of the Jewish people. He attempted to convert us all into Christians.”
Jesus, according to the video, wanted the Jews to assimilate with the Goyim, and to assimilate “means to get [f-up] with the goyah.” In the process, a puppet monkey is crucified on the cross saying things like,
“I’m scared! I walked on water, I transformed crickets into cake! I am not Yeshu! This is a mistake!”
Imagine the outcry if a goyim attempts to slightly mimic this video clip. Remember the outcry when Mel Gibson’s The Passion of the Christ came out?
After movie was released, Charles Patterson blamed all the horrors of Jewish suffering on the gospels’ accounts. Patterson writes:
“The trouble with Mel Gibson’s film ‘The Passion’ is not the film itself, but the gospel story on which it’s based. The gospel story, which has generated more anti-Semitism than the sum of all the other anti-Semitic writings ever written, created the climate in Christian Europe that led to the Holocaust. Long before the rise of Adolf Hitler, the gospel story about the life and death of Jesus had poisoned the bloodstream of European civilization.”
Heinrich Graetz drew the same conclusion more than a century earlier, charging that Christians’ “hatred against Jews” was “derived from the gospels and their theological literature.”
For Jami Bernard of the New York Daily News, Gibson’s Passion was “the most virulently antisemitic movie made since the German propaganda films of World War II.”
Daniel Jonah Goldhagen, author of the fraudulent book Hitler’s Willing Executioners, wrote that “Gibson’s film takes the fetishizing of horror and death that exists within Christianity to some sort of sickly logical conclusion.
Visually, iconographically and symbolically, Gibson’s ‘Passion’ is a sadomasochistic, orgiastic display that demonizes Jews as it degrades those who revel in viewing the horror…
“Its orgy of unsurpassed and virtually unremitting sadism restores this part of the Jesus story—de-emphasized by the Catholic Church since the Vatican II reforms—to center stage, to haunt all those who would follow Jesus with indelible, iconic images of cruelty. Gibson has thus unwittingly exposed the misguidedness of this cult of death.”
Jewish professor Paul Fredriksen declared when the movie came out, “When violence breaks out, Mel Gibson will have a much higher authority than professors and bishops to answer to.”
The Los Angeles Times added that the movie is “a gasoline-soaked rag tossed on the already roaring flames of anti-Semitism.”
Rabbi Tovia Singer was more pessimistic:
“By the time the first nail is hammered into the cross, viewers in Germany will be passing around knife sharpeners in the theater. Israel may have to absorb a massive flight of European Jewry.”
Fredricksen implies that the movie is anti-Semitic, but Fredriksen writes it was the Jews who inspired Pilate to kill Jesus! After reading Fredricksen’s work, Jewish writer David Klinghoffer opined,
“Pilate Killed Jesus. But even Fredriksen allows that it was the priests who tipped him off to the threat posed by the Christian savior—or rather, by those who followed him.”
But according to America’s most popular Rabbi, Shmuley Boteach, “It was the Romans, and solely the Romans, who put Jesus to death,” [but] “it was the Christians who crucified him. They made him the very fountain of anti-Semitism.”
Gibson, according to Boteach, is “a rancid anti-Semitic bigot!” Boteach made those comments even before the movie came out! This had baffled even Jeremy Gerard of New York Magazine. When Boteach asked the question, “where are the Hollywood celebrities to condemn the film?,” Gerard responded, “Waiting to see it, perhaps?”
Gibson even had to delete scenes such as “his blood be upon us and upon our children,” but that was not good enough for Boteach. Gibson, who “could not get backing from the Hollywood studios,” had to get the money somewhere else: his own pocket.
“After early accusations of anti-Semitism, it became difficult for Gibson to find an American distribution company. 20th Century Fox had a first-look deal with Icon and passed on the film in response to public protests.”
Let us entertain the thought that the Passion of the Christ is anti-Semitic, as Boteach and others claimed. What are we going to do with movies such as You’re Next (2011), Eli Roth’s The Last Exorcism (2010), and countless others?
Is Boteach at least willing to bear some responsibility? Shouldn’t we hold Cronenberg, Stuart Gordon, Darren Aronofsky, and a host of others responsible for deconstructing what art is supposed to be? Shouldn’t they be held responsible for mocking what people consider to be sacrilegious?
You are a premillenial dispensationalist and believe in this rapture stuff? Welcome to Rapture-Palooza. You are a Catholic? Welcome to Frank Miller’s Sin City (2005), Monsignor (1982), Agnes of God (1985), Rosemary’s Baby (1968), and a host of others.
You are a Muslim and have nothing to do with terrorist activity? Welcome to the Iron Man movie series, Dark Knight Rises, and a host of others. Your country will more than likely be mentioned as a terrorist cell.
You’re a decent German have nothing to do with Nazi Germany? Welcome to Captain America, Inglorious Basterds, etc.
You’re a Russian? Welcome to Kick Ass 2 and Salt. You are an Israeli? Well, your country will be portrayed as an ally to the United States and beacon of light in much of the Western world and the Middle East in movies such as Delta Force, featuring Chuck Norris.
In short, Hollywood, the ministry of propaganda, has something for each and every one of us.
The crux of those movies is that terrorism and covert activity can only come from countries in the Middle East and in Russia. They never even remotely suggest that Jewish revolutionaries, since the time of Bar Kokhba, play an astronomical role in spreading terrorism in much of the world for thousands of years.
But if you produce just one movie about how the crucifixion was a joint effort between the Jews and Pilate, you are then a rabid anti-Semite!
THE ISRAELI REGIME IS THE REAL ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM
In a nutshell, in the psychological war, anything that will distract the enemy and perceptive and articulate observers from seeing the real elephant in the room is permissible.
Let us suppose for example that ninety percent of Americans stay away from Hollywood propaganda for just three months and concentrate on how the Israeli regime has wrapped America around a neo-Bolshevik plan, certainly there would be a huge change in foreign policy because the vast majority of Americans would be able to see that the Zionist regime can and is willing to suspend any law, including international law, in order to marshal their Mephistophelian agendas in the Middle East. Just recently,
“The Obama administration waived provisions of a federal law which ban the supply of weapons and money to terrorists. The move is opening doors to supplying Syrian opposition with protection from chemical weapons.
“The Arms Export Control Act (AECA) allows the US president to waive provisions in Sections 40 and 40A, which forbid providing munitions, credit and licenses to countries supporting acts of terrorism. But those prohibitions can be waived “if the President determines that the transaction is essential to the national security interests of the United States.”
The Zionist regime suspends the rule of law in order to support terrorists! That’s not worse than stupid—that’s hellish. Obama is not that stupid. He is just being used as a master puppet to fulfill the Zionist dream of heaven on earth, since we know for certain that the Israeli regime controls American foreign policy. Scholar and former CIA official Paul R. Pillar writes,
“The Israeli government may have the deciding vote on the matter before Congress [strike on Syria], not so much because it appears to have been the source of intelligence that the Obama administration is relying on to make a case tying the chemical incident two weeks ago to the Assad regime (although there are interesting questions to be raised about that) but because members of Congress anticipating their next re-election campaign will be thinking about what type of vote Benjamin Netanyahu’s government desires, a criterion that routinely gets equated in American political discourse with ‘support for Israel.’”
Obama and the neo-Bolsheviks keep talking about a limited strike, but no one has been able to tell us how a military and aggressive strike against a sovereign nation can be “limited.”
Moreover, no one has been able to explain how the Zionist regime can invade a sovereign country while the majority of people in the same country, including university students, do not accept a military strike. As Pillar articulates,
“Neither the administration nor anyone else has adequately explained how this can be assured if subsequent escalation or retaliation from the other side follows a U.S. strike. As California Republican Ed Royce observed in a hearing of the House Foreign Affairs Committee Wednesday, “the Assad regime would have a say in what happens next.”
What is even more outrageous is that when Russia presented a 1000-page document concluding that it was the rebels, not Assad, who actually used chemical weapons, the Zionist regime in America declared otherwise—with not a single evidence to the contrary.
As Pillar further explains,
“Does the United States want to follow its powerful and privileged Israeli client on a path that not only brushes aside international law, international organization, and the peaceful pursuit of international objectives but also entails perpetual warfare, much isolation, and all of the costs and risks that go with that?”
Pillar suggests in his conclusion that when a “game works well for Netanyahu,” more than likely the same game “is awful” for the United States.
How ironic that it is Russia, not the United States or Britain, that is forcing the West to take the path of peace in Syria. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov had even thought about forcing “foes of Syrian President Bashar-al-Assad to attend an international peace conference instead of urging them to do so”! What does Russia get in return?
“US Senators have urged the Obama administration to freeze assets of three major Russian banks, ban their activities in the US, and deny employees’ entry into the country on the suspicion they are doing business with the Assad regime.”
CRIMES COMMITTED BY ZIONISM KEEP PILING UP
We have already seen that the Saudis sent death-row inmates in Syria to overthrow Assad.
Now we are learning that Al-Qaeda and sections of the Syrian rebels/terrorists are recruiting soldiers from other places such as Iraq. Since the past two months, hundreds of prisoners from the notorious Abu Ghraib have been let go, and the rebels are making use of those people.
“On July 21, Islamic militants used suicide bombers to blow their way into Abu Ghraib’s prison, releasing close to 500 convicts, many of whom were senior members of Al Qaeda. According to Jessica Lewis from the Institute for the Study of War, a public policy think tank that provides defense analysis, the prison rescue was the last operation of a year-long campaign called ‘Breaking the Walls,’ in which Al Qaeda members sprung jails in and around Iraq, and as a result, have ‘significantly increased the operational depth of the organization.’
“The campaign was orchestrated by Abu Bakr al Baghdadi, the leader of the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIS), which along with Jabhat al Nusra, has become a major Al Qaeda faction within the Syrian opposition.” 
Despite all of that, Stephen Rapp, U.S. war-crimes ambassador, raps that Assad should be trialed for his crime against humanity.
Assad should accept that challenge.
Let us further suppose that Assad did use chemical weapons and was responsible for killing innocent civilians. Assad should propose that Bush, Obama, Perle, Veith, and nearly all the neoconservatives should be trialed for creating chaos in the Middle East and for slaughtering millions of civilians.
Even former Secretary of Defense Robert M. Gates declares that for Obama to attack Syria is like “throwing gasoline on an extremely complex fire in the Middle East.”
Israel ambassador Michael Oren has recently brought some light into the Syrian situation by saying that Israel has privately wanted to remove Assad since the war began. Oren unequivocally declares,
“The initial message about the Syrian issue was that we always wanted Bashar Assad to go, we always preferred the bad guys [Al Qaida] who weren’t backed by Iran to the bad guys who were backed by Iran.
“The greatest danger to Israel is by the strategic arc that extends from Tehran, to Damascus to Beirut. And we saw the Assad regime as the keystone in that arc.” Oren is optimistic about the future of Jews in America because they will be “committed and attached to Israel.”
Assad should also ask that the Israeli regime be trialed for mass murder in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya, etc. The neo-Bolsheviks in America should be trialed for eradicating the Christian population in Syria, for allowing the NSA to spy on far-distant countries such as Austria, for continuing to disregard the vast majority of Americans and Europeans who reject a Syria invasion, and for creating economic havoc in the U.S. and in much of Europe.
Just last year, it has been reported that the U.S. spent $25 billion in Afghanistan, and all that money was largely wasted on what the Zionists wanted to do, and no one can actually know for sure where all the money went.
Finally, the Zionist war machine should be trialed for telling a Swat team, “one of the first teams of heavily armed police to respond to Monday’s shooting in Washington,” to “stand down” during the recent mass shooting.
The story behind Aaron Alexis gets even more complicated when Bloomberg declares that the “U.S. government contractor that vetted Edward Snowden” performed background checks on Alexis.
Moreover, “Alexis had a secret-level clearance that would have enabled him to get an access card needed to get on the base.” Senator Claire McCaskill of Missouri suddenly had a political awakening:
“From Edward Snowden to Aaron Alexis, what’s emerging is a pattern of failure on the part of this company[Providence Equity Parners], and a failure of this entire system, that risks nothing less than our national security and the lives of Americans.
“What’s most frightening is that USIS performs a majority of background checks for our government. We clearly need a top-to-bottom overhaul of how we vet those who have access to our country’s secrets and to our secure facilities. I plan to pursue such an overhaul, and won’t rest until it’s achieved. ”
The same company was under criminal investigation last June.
Let us further entertain the Zionist position that Assad is responsible for the deaths of 100,000 people—although the claim is completely bogus. They will never take even one responsibility for their own chaos precisely because it goes back to what Maurice Samuel said a number of years ago.
For example, from 1962 until 1971, the U.S. dropped 20 million gallons of chemicals on the population, which culminated in the death of civilians.
Between 2008 and 2009, Israel dropped white phosphorus on the vast majority of the Palestinians. Human rights groups such as Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and International Red Cross have all condemned the act, but the international community dared not to sanction Israel.
The U.S. also attacked Iraq in 2004 with white phosphorus, but as the Zionist saying goes, they were just fighting the bad guys.
JOHN MCCAIN SIGNS PACTS WITH TERRORISTS TO POLITICALLY DESTROY RUSSIA
As we are currently observing, when a serious politician challenges the essentially Masonic heaven on earth of the Zionist regime, that politician will be lambasted all over the world. John McCain’s recent denigration of Putin and the Russian people is a classic example.
What probably brought McCain over the edge was that Putin truthfully made it clear that the United States relies “solely on brute force” in its dealings with other nations, most particularly countries in the Middle East.
McCain, who has been ideologically Jewified and politically bar-mitzvahed long ago, tells the Russian people that Putin “doesn’t believe in you” and is “destroying” Russia’s reputation in the world. Putin and his associates, continues McCain,
“don’t respect your dignity or accept your authority over them. They punish dissent and imprison opponents. They rig your elections. They control your media. They harass, threaten, and banish organizations that defend your right to self-governance.”
Does McCain actually believe that the Russian people, who produced brilliant thinkers like Alexander Solzhenitsyn and Fyodor Dostoyevsky, are that stupid and unintelligent?
McCain is saying that Russia punishes dissent and imprisons opponents without even thinking that it was Russia that actually gave dissident voices like Edward Snowden asylum!
McCain does not seem to remember that it was the Zionist State of America that actually wants to “punish and imprison” Snowden.
It is not that McCain is getting old and his memory is astronomically fading; it is that McCain has already made packs with the Syrian terrorists. He declared that “it is not true” that the Syrian rebels are terrorists.
McCain should have listened to Neo-Bolshevik William Kristol when Kristol admitted that “al Qaeda is stronger among the Syrian rebels” than before, despite the fact that Kristol still wanted the U.S. to attack Syria.
Even the Wall Street Journal declares that the rebels fight among themselves and do not have a coherent military organization, but McCain and the Zionist regime are too blind to see it.
McCain declared right after Snowden was granted asylum that Russia’s actions were
“a disgrace and a deliberate effort to embarrass the United States. It is a slap in the face of all Americans. Now is the time to fundamentally rethink our relationship with [President Vladimir] Putin’s Russia. We need to deal with the Russia that is, not the Russia we might wish for. We cannot allow today’s action by Putin to stand without serious repercussions.”
In a similar vein, Clifford D. May of National Review and president of the Foundation for Defense Democracies called Putin “a Neo-Soviet Man” who espouses “Russian nationalism, crony capitalism, authoritarianism, and Machtpolitik.”
In other words, if you do not allow Jewish bankers and usurers like Goldman Sachs and Wall Street send the population into abject servitude, then you more than likely will be called all sorts of names. The neo-Bolshevik continues,
“Putin is deeply committed to winning, to beating Obama like a rented mule, to diminishing the United States, exacting a little revenge for all America did to undermine the Soviet empire…
“As for the gassing of women and children by Bashar Assad, Russia’s friend and Iran’s loyal servant, I think Putin will leave it to bourgeois humanists to shed the salty tears.”
TO THE RUSSIAN PEOPLE
Finally, speaking of silencing dissident voices, Solzhenitsyn’s magnum opus, Two Hundred Years Together, is yet to appear in the English-speaking world because the Zionist state does not like the conclusion of the book, although it was a best-seller in Russia.
Here is my challenge to the decent Russian people: read Solzhenitsyn’s Two Hundred Years Together, and you will discover that McCain has been paid to do the Zionist’s dirty work.
My dear Russian friends, consider this. Nearly all of Solzhenitsyn’s books have been translated into English. Ask yourself this question: why no one has ever agreed to publish Two Hundred Years Together?
My dear Russians, if McCain is so open-minded, ask him that question the next time he wants to scourge you with his Zionist tongue. The answer may surprise you.