“The Western use of lies to demonize Russia endangers life on earth and reveals the West to be both reckless and irresponsible.” Paul Craig Roberts
…by Jonas E. Alexis
Over the past two years or so, I have been looking for consistent neoconservatives/Zionists who would state their positions clearly (most specifically with respect to the Middle East) and follow them to their logical conclusions.
On many occasions I would accept their faulty premises for the sake of argument, but once those Zionists discover that their arguments are existentially worthless and unlivable, they would back off and repudiate the very thing that they attempted to show. One of my dear historian friends and colleagues is a classic example.
For more than a year, he and I have been discussing the Israel/Palestine conflict and he never seems to take some his own ideological claims to their metaphysical abyss because they are so ridiculous.
He kept saying that Palestine largely belonged to the Jews since the beginning of time and therefore they now have legitimate reasons to reclaim the land.
Once again, I grant him that premise but move to explore it in a different context, since he is an expert of some sort in American history.
“The Indians used to live in the Americas long before you and I came on the scene, am I correct?,” I asked. “Yes,” he responded cynically. I continued:
“What if they get together now and say something like, ‘Dear Americans, this is our land and we want it back. Please find somewhere else to live.’ Do you think we should give it back to them?”
There was a long pause, and he mentally and mightily tried to get out of the ever-present dilemma. We were both sitting next to each other during a break at a retreat center and it was winter. It was warm and comfortable inside and extremely cold outside. So, there was no way for either of us to just walk out of the nice facility and chill outside for more than thirty minutes.
But the warmness and coziness inside seemed to be fading away, particularly when his mental process was failing him.
As the silence continued, I realized that I should make him feel at ease by dropping the subject and move on to something else…like talking about biking, places to explore and so on. (He and I usually bike together.) But then I quickly realized that this would not work either.
So I grabbed my kindle from my backpack and continued to read Marc David Baer’s recent study The Donme: Jewish Converts, Muslim Revolutionaries, and Secular Turks, published by Stanford University Press in 2010, which I shall discuss in the future.
Then he broke the silence by saying, “I’ll tell you what. If they [meaning the Indians] have enough power to do it, then they should get their land back.”
That certainly was a surprise, to which I responded, “So, survival of the fittest?” He reluctantly said, “Yeah.”
I looked at him for about fifteen seconds, eyeball to eyeball, because he teaches in his history class that slavery is wrong, but his ideological weltanschauung unintentionally and inexorably leads him to embrace the very position he tries to refute!
Once again, I did not want to pursue this any longer, since further attempts would have been futile.
What happened over the next six months or so was that he would send some of his best students to talk to me about similar issues. “We’ve heard you’ve taken the Israelis to task,” they would say.
Knowing that this is a thorny and complex issue which cannot be discussed thoroughly without some background knowledge, I proceeded to ask them, “Why does Korea still have some animosity toward the Japanese?”
“Well, duh, they humiliated us and our women and forced many of them into sex slaves between 1910 and 1945,” was the typical response. In fact, it is widely viewed that
“Some 20 million people died and millions more were subjugated and oppressed during Japan’s half-century of war and colonial expansion, which ended in 1945.”
My response was simple:
“You guys are carrying a scar that needs to be buried once and for all. You ought to learn to forgive, particularly when the perceived enemy recognized what he did in the past and ask for reconciliation.
“If you cannot forgive, then you have to examine your own hearts and realize that you all need forgiveness for many of the evil things you’ve committed. Look at history and ask yourselves: do you think Korea has always been innocent and has never committed atrocities—either abroad or even at home?
“Moreover, if forgiveness should not be part of your vocabulary when it comes to Japan, then you are stopping progress and fruitful and meaningful dialogues, which are essential to heal historical wounds.
“But let us suppose that you are right in being angry at the Japanese. Don’t you see why most Palestinians are upset? What if I tell you that in 1948, at least 700,000 Palestinians were uprooted from the homes and slaughtered?
“This is not Mr. Alexis saying this. You can ask Israeli historians such as Benny Morris and others and they will tell you exactly that.
“Furthermore, what if I tell you that Israeli government has never issued an apology for this genocide? Japan has apologized numerous times. You all know that many Koreans, particularly the women who suffered during that period, still have not accepted that apology because they think that it is not genuine.
“What if I tell you that the Israeli genocidal process is still going on in places like Gaza, which to many Jewish scholars and U.S. politicians is an ‘open-air prison’ or ‘concentration camps’”?
All of a sudden, the room got quiet. And I do not have to describe how the conversation ended, since we have plenty of other things to talk about.
The search for consistent neoconservatives/Zionists has been all in vain. You can walk into neoconservative circles and projects, follow their premises to their “logical” conclusions, and soon or later you will find yourself in a torrent of illogical leaps, historical inaccuracies and deliberate lies and fabrications, and ultimately covert deceptions.
Neoconservative Bill Whittle is no exception. This man in particular could be a perfect rat catcher. (Did you know that the active ingredients of many pesticides are over 90% good food? It is only a very small amount that eventually kills the rat. )
Whittle seems to be an expert at producing a little bit of truth here and there and blend it with a swamp of lies and covert deceptions.
Whittle continues to propound his lies and half-truths in his videos not because the historical evidence is unavailable but because to crack-open rigorous historical studies—such as Jews and Revolution in Nineteenth-Century Russia or Esau’s Tears or Two Nations in Your Womb or Cursing the Christians or Jewish Terrorism in Israel or even Righteous Victims?—would literally render his propaganda films historically incoherent and logically worthless.
To understand the magnitude of Whittle’s demonstrably preposterous argument, let us watch one of his recent videos very carefully:
Did you see how slick Mr. Whittle is? He mentioned Felix Dzerzhinsky, but he never told us that Dzerzhinsky was part of the Jewish revolutionary movement which terrified the entire Russian people and which took innocent Russians, to use Winston Churchill’s words, by the hair of their heads and slaughtered them in cold blood.
Dzerzhinsky noted on the first day of the Bolshevik Revolution:
“The defense of the revolution cannot take into account that it may harm particular individuals…the Cheka must defend the revolution and defeat the foe even if in doing so its sword might chance to fall on innocent heads.”
Whittle mentioned Vyacheslav Menzhinsky, but he could not bring himself to the fact that Menzhinsky was Jewish and was following the revolutionary movement which his largely Jewish brethren had started.
Russian historian and playwright Edvard Radvinsky himself tells us that Menzhinsky “had a hand in all the dreadful deeds of the Red Terror,” although “he fastidiously absented himself from the torture chamber and from executions.”
Menzhinsky, “formally in charge of the Cheka,” eventually “became the effective head of the Bolshevik secret service…”
Menzhinsky “had failed to make his mark at law, poetry and prose, in revolutionary politics, music, painting, languages, finance, or diplomacy,” and as a law student, his dissertation, “Communal Land Ownership in Populist and Marxist Literature,” was a failure and
“was returned as ‘unsatisfactory’ by one professor who read it and as ‘unlikely to be assessable by a civilian’ by another. The dissertation scornfully surveyed the peasantry whom thirty years later Menzhinsky would help Stalin destroy.”
Menzhinsky studied law, but his real political appetite and nihilistic aspiration is revolution, which drew him to Satanists and decadent individuals . Historian Donald Rayfield tells us,
“In the early 1900s Menzhinsky practiced law, but his literary ambitions drew him into the decadent circle around a notorious homosexual, Satanist, and multifarious genius, Mikhail Kusmin…
“He also dabbled in Bolshevism: his mother Maria Nikolaevna was a friend of the great-aunt of Elena Stasova, who was close both to Lenin and Stalin in his Tbilisi years.
“On weekends Menzhinsky followed the family hobby of workers’ education and preached revolution…A bourgeois on workdays, a Bolshevik on Sundays, and a decadent at night, Menzhinsky showed remarkable duplicity.”
Menzhinsky eventually made his mark at slaughtering innocent people and watching them bleed to death.
Whittle also made reference to Genrikh Yagoda. Who was he? Yagoda was once again Jewish and ended up serving as director of the NKVD, the most brutal and wicked law enforcement of the Soviet Union which involved in covert operations such as spying and terrorist operations, assassinations, brutal torture, mass murder, and mass execution.
Whittle called Nikolai Yezhov an “animal,” but he never told us that it was the Jewish revolutionary spirit that corrupted Yezhov’s mind and turned him into, well, “an animal.”
If Whittle has a problem with those historical and incontrovertible facts, perhaps he needs to pick up the phone and call Jewish writer Sever Plocker, who declared unequivocally in 2006:
“We mustn’t forget that some of the greatest murderers of modern times were Jewish…
“In his new, highly praised book ‘The War of the World,’ Historian Niall Ferguson writes that no revolution in the history of mankind devoured its children with the same unrestrained appetite as did the Soviet revolution.
“In his book on the Stalinist purges, Tel Aviv University’s Dr. Igal Halfin writes that Stalinist violence was unique in that it was directed internally.
“Lenin, Stalin, and their successors could not have carried out their deeds without wide-scale cooperation of disciplined ‘terror officials,’ cruel interrogators, snitches, executioners, guards, judges, perverts, and many bleeding hearts who were members of the progressive Western Left and were deceived by the Soviet regime of horror and even provided it with a kosher certificate.
“All these things are well-known to some extent or another, even though the former Soviet Union’s archives have not yet been fully opened to the public.
“But who knows about this? Within Russia itself, very few people have been brought to justice for their crimes in the NKVD’s and KGB’s service. The Russian public discourse today completely ignores the question of ‘How could it have happened to us?’ As opposed to Eastern European nations, the Russians did not settle the score with their Stalinist past.
“And us, the Jews? An Israeli student finishes high school without ever hearing the name “Genrikh Yagoda,” the greatest Jewish murderer of the 20th Century, the GPU’s deputy commander and the founder and commander of the NKVD.
“Yagoda diligently implemented Stalin’s collectivization orders and is responsible for the deaths of at least 10 million people. His Jewish deputies established and managed the Gulag system.
“After Stalin no longer viewed him favorably, Yagoda was demoted and executed, and was replaced as chief hangman in 1936 by Yezhov, the “bloodthirsty dwarf.”
“Yezhov was not Jewish but was blessed with an active Jewish wife. In his Book “Stalin: Court of the Red Star”, Jewish historian Sebag Montefiore writes that during the darkest period of terror, when the Communist killing machine worked in full force, Stalin was surrounded by beautiful, young Jewish women.
“Stalin’s close associates and loyalists included member of the Central Committee and Politburo Lazar Kaganovich. Montefiore characterizes him as the ‘first Stalinist’ and adds that those starving to death in Ukraine, an unparalleled tragedy in the history of human kind aside from the Nazi horrors and Mao’s terror in China, did not move Kaganovich.
“Many Jews sold their soul to the devil of the Communist revolution and have blood on their hands for eternity. We’ll mention just one more: Leonid Reichman, head of the NKVD’s special department and the organization’s chief interrogator, who was a particularly cruel sadist.
“In 1934, according to published statistics, 38.5 percent of those holding the most senior posts in the Soviet security apparatuses were of Jewish origin. They too, of course, were gradually eliminated in the next purges.
“In a fascinating lecture at a Tel Aviv University convention this week, Dr. Halfin described the waves of soviet terror as a ‘carnival of mass murder,’ ‘fantasy of purges’, and ‘essianism of evil.’ Turns out that Jews too, when they become captivated by messianic ideology, can become great murderers, among the greatest known by modern history.
“The Jews active in official communist terror apparatuses (In the Soviet Union and abroad) and who at times led them, did not do this, obviously, as Jews, but rather, as Stalinists, communists, and ‘Soviet people.’
“Therefore, we find it easy to ignore their origin and ‘play dumb’: What do we have to do with them? But let’s not forget them…”
“Even if we deny it, we cannot escape the Jewishness of ‘our hangmen,’ who served the Red Terror with loyalty and dedication from its establishment. After all, others will always remind us of their origin.”
In short, Whittle’s argument is a massive pile of propaganda because he lacks the historical courage to tell us that the NKVD itself was largely Jewish. For example,
“One of Stalin’s closest collaborators, to the end of his life, was Lazar Moissee Kaganovich, chiefly responsible, in addition to other persons, for ‘an unprecedented act of genocide’—the carefully planned murder of seven to nine million Ukrainian farmers during the 1932-1933 famine.
“Kaganovich was ‘responsible for the death of an entire generation of intellectuals,’ and personally signed execution orders for 36,000 people.”
Jewish historian P. Medvedev wrote that Kaganovich had “‘his hand in the murder of millions,’ and had more crimes on his conscience ‘than the men hanged at Nuremberg in 1946.’”
The men who ordered the execution of 15,000 Polish officers at Katyn were Voroshilov, Molotov, Mikoyan, Kalinin, Kaganovich, and of course Stalin.
But things got even more interesting: The Soviets used the Nuremberg proceedings
“to perpetuate the myth that the Nazis were responsible for shooting the twenty-two thousand Polish officers and government officials whom Stalin and Beria ordered to be executed by the NKVD in 1940.
“The Western judges never challenged this shameful subterfuge, though the indictment against the Nazis for the killing was eventually dropped.”
There is more. Noted historian Norman Davies writes,
“The British War Crimes Act applies exclusively to crimes committed ‘by Germans or on German-occupied territory.’ And the European parliament, when recently asked to grant a minute’s silence in honour of 22,000 allied officers shot by the NKVD (the communist secret police), refused.”
The fact that Stalin was responsible for killing the Polish officers was well known to historians, but the news only came out to the public in 2010!
Many of these acts were the source of Hitler’s anti-Jewish reactions, and even historian Ralf-George Reuth has already come out and implicitly declared that Stalin’s Bolshevism and Jewish domination of the banks in Germany were largely responsible for Nazi Germany. Reuth declared,
“With World War One lost and Germany in financial ruin, with revolution threatening, he came to see the Jews as solely responsible for stock-exchange capitalism, which caused acute poverty and suffering when it faltered, and Bolshevism.”
No serious historian can deny the fact that Jews played the central role in the Bolshevik Revolution, and no serious scholar would brush aside the fact that Jewish revolutionaries were literally suppressing the Germans through banking, the press, and the entertainment industry.
The entertainment industry itself turned Berlin into a whore zone. People like D. H. Lawrence and Christopher Isherwood, who were deeply committed to sexual liberation, were even frightened to see how the sex and queer industry turned the Weimar Republic into a sex machine that could produce perversity in a matter of minutes.
Furthermore, Jewish historian Edward J. Bristow argues that the sex industry was dominated by Jewish pimps and whores and eventually spread like wild fire in Europe and other places. Hitler was observing all that and was taking copious notes, which he later reproduced to boost Nazi Germany.
Finally, did you see how Whittle showed a picture of Alexander Solzhenitsyn (for about three seconds) without even mentioning his name and his work? If you are not familiar with Solzhenitsyn, you probably did not even notice him in the video clip. Why is that?
Well, Solzhenitsyn, like Winston Churchill, had some damning things to say about the Bolshevik Revolution, which he witnessed firsthand. Solzhenitsyn wrote,
“There are many Jewish authors who to this very day either deny the support of Jews for Bolshevism, or even reject it angrily, or else—the most common case—only speak defensively about it.
“The matter is well-attested, however: these Jewish renegades were for several years leaders at the center of the Bolshevik Party, at the head of the Red Army (Trotsky), of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee (Sverdlov), of the two capitals (Zinoviev and Kamenev), of the Comintern (Zinoviev), of the Profintern (Dridzo-Lozovsky), and of the Komsomol (Oskar Ryvkin, then Lazar Shatskin).
“In 1918 Trotsky, with the aid of Sklianski and Yakov Sverdlov, created the Red Army. Jewish soldiers were numerous in its ranks. Several units of the Red Army were composed entirely of Jews, as, e.g., the brigade commanded by Joseph Forman. Among the officers of the Red Army, the share of Jews grew in number and importance for many years after the Civil War.”
Solzhenitsyn was a Marxist and even blamed himself for being part of the Bolshevik regime. Yet in later life, Solzhenitsyn became a committed Christian and saw what the Jewish revolutionaries who were in power did to Christians—he was imprisoned, tortured, and sent into exile.
Yet he was by no means anti-Semitic, as Jewish writers such as Vladimir Voynovich have argued. A few years before Solzhenitsyn’s death in August 2008, Jewish historian Richard Pipes attacked Solzhenitsyn in print.
Regarding Solzhenitsyn’s Deux Siecles Ensembles: Juifs et Russes avant la Revolution (“Two Hundred Years Together: Jews and Russians before the Revolution”), which has only been published in France because no publisher will print it in the English-speaking world, Pipes has nothing good to say about the book other than that it was “something more than a personal statement yet less than a work of scholarship.”
Not only that, Pipes stated that the charge of anti-Semitism leveled against Solzhenitsyn “was not entirely unmerited,” based largely on how Solzhenitsyn treated the Jewish characters in his novels.
Nothing could be further from the truth. Solzhenitsyn, like a serious Catholic intellectual who actually understands the historical and metaphysical conflict between Christ (the moral order) and anti-Christ (inventors of chaos and bloodshed and mass murder), explicitly said,
“I have never made general conclusions about a people. I will always differentiate between layers of Jews. One layer rushed headfirst to the revolution. Another, to the contrary, was trying to stand back.
“The Jewish subject for a long time was considered prohibited. Zhabotinsky [a Jewish writer] once said that the best service our Russian friends give to us is never to speak aloud about us.”
“I would not doubt his sincerity. He says that he firmly supports the state of Israel. In his fiction and factual writing there are Jewish characters that he writes about who are bright, decent, anti-Stalinist people.”
There is nothing in Solzhenitsyn’s writings to suggest that he was against the Jews as a race of people. He even proposes “patient mutual comprehension” between Russians and Russian Jews in the hope that this would open “mutually agreeable and fruitful pathways for the future development of Russian-Jewish relations.”
What Solzhenitsyn disagreed with, as he clearly states, was the ideological basis of Judaism—“not in the racial sense, but in the sense of the Jewry as a certain worldview.”
This is what the Catholic Church has been saying since time immemorial, and this is what Civilta Cattolica later articulated indirectly at the end of the nineteenth century. Furthermore, this is what the Gospels articulate.
For example, Christ makes it clear that “Salvation is of the Jews,” which obviously means that Christ and his disciples were ethnic Jews.
But there was and still is a serious tension between the Jews who accepted Christ as the Messiah and those who don’t, which inevitably shows that the issue is not “racial” but theological.
Those who did embrace Christ eventually came to be known as Christians, and those who rejected him and attacked him theologically came to be known as “the synagogue of Satan.”
And that “synagogue of Satan” over the years produced a theological book known as the Talmud, which is essentially a repudiation of the moral and social order and the denigration of the Goyim.
Furthermore, the political ideology of that theological book is directly or indirectly the bedrock upon which all significant revolutionaries are based. That subversive ideology has never died out, and over the centuries has jumped around from place to place and movement to movement and has even taken different forms and variations.
It manifested itself briefly in fourteenth-century Spain when usury was used at an exorbitant rate, which ended up suppressing the peasants and provoking anti-Jewish reactions in the region.
It sent shockwaves across much of Europe during the Hussite rebellion in the fifteenth century. It reached its pinnacle during the Peasant Revolt in the sixteenth century when judaizing “Christians” ended up smearing excrement on crucifixes and vandalizing and destroying churches and monasteries.
From 1221 until 1796, the Act, or Statue, was proclaimed in Poland. It provided the background for exclusively Jewish courts in Poland, free of society’s rules and, in the process, exempted Jews from engaging in slavery.
This eventually led again to usurious activity, which drove the peasants into abject poverty and led to anti-Jewish reactions, although some scholars state that the peasants’ charges were based on false grounds.
(This itself is based on false historical grounds, and even the father of modern Jewish historiography Heinrich Graetz admitted that by immersing themselves in the study of the Talmud, Polish Jews found a sophisticated way to cheat the Gentiles.)
That the revolutionary spirit which fell upon some Jews used usury as a weapon to reduce the majority to abject economic poverty has been pointed out by other historians of various stripes, and we have examined this issue in the past.
In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the revolutionary spirit produced false Jewish messiahs such as Shabbatai Zevi (1626-1676), who spearheaded the Sabbatean movement, which is based on literal sexual perversion.And Zevi himself flirted with some of these sexual fantasies.
The same movement later produced staunch disciples and lesser known messiahs such as Barukhia Russo, Miguel Cardoso, Mordecai Mokia, Lobele Prossnitz, and Jacob Joseph Frank, compounding disaster on disaster.
The revolutionary spirit swept Europe in the nineteenth century with the rise of Marxism, which was the ideological brainchild of Karl Marx and Moses Hess.
In the nineteenth century, it showed itself in much of Europe and sections in America in the sex industry, which was largely a Jewish enterprise—an enterprise which gave rise to Hitler’s negative conception of the Jews.
The revolutionary spirit drove the Bolsheviks into mass murder, which, according to Jewish historian Arno J. Mayer of Princeton, largely ended up driving Hitler into a bloody conflict with the Soviet Russia.
The revolutionary ideology also had a great influence on the slavery business in the nineteenth century and beyond—a business which again was largely Jewish and which is now laid at the feet of helpless Europeans.
In the twentieth century, the revolutionary spirit morphed in the psychoanalytic movement with Sigmund Freud as the founder, who brought “the plague” (Freud’s own words) to America in 1909.
This gradually branched off into the obscenity scene in the 1920s and all the way to the 1940s in New York and other parts of the United States. Freud ended up redefining sexuality and pornography and was indirectly a key figure in the sexual revolution.
Wilhelm Reich, Freud’s devoted disciple, took Freud’s ideology and spread it across the board, and for that he was eventually kicked out of Germany.
It is this diabolical spirit that we are attacking, and it is this Mephistophelian ideology that Alexander Solzhenitsyn was addressing. Some people have argued that the issue is “racial” and “genetic” and that the Jews somehow are genetically defective. Pure nonsense.
“Your recent two-volume work 200 Years Together was an attempt to overcome a taboo against discussing the common history of Russians and Jews. These two volumes have provoked mainly perplexity in the West.
“You say the Jews are the leading force of global capital and they are among the foremost destroyers of the bourgeoisie. Are we to conclude from your rich array of sources that the Jews carry more responsibility than others for the failed Soviet experiment?”
Without hesitation, the articulate and no-nonsense scholar responded:
“I avoid exactly that which your question implies: I do not call for any sort of scorekeeping or comparisons between the moral responsibility of one people or another; moreover, I completely exclude the notion of responsibility of one nation towards another. All I am calling for is self-reflection.
“You can get the answer to your question from the book itself: “Every people must answer morally for all of its past—including that past which is shameful. Answer by what means? By attempting to comprehend: How could such a thing have been allowed? Where in all this is our error? And could it happen again?
“It is in that spirit, specifically, that it would behoove the Jewish people to answer, both for the revolutionary cutthroats and the ranks willing to serve them. Not to answer before other peoples, but to oneself, to one’s consciousness, and before God.
“Just as we Russians must answer—for the pogroms, for those merciless arsonist peasants, for those crazed revolutionary soldiers, for those savage sailors.”
Again, Solzhenitsyn did not close his eyes in order to avoid witnessing what was happening in Russia. He asked the Jews who took part in the revolution and “in the ideological guidance of a huge country down a false path” to accept “moral responsibility” for their actions and to “repent” for their role in the “Cheka executions, the drowning of the barges with the condemned in the White and Caspian Seas, collectivization, Ukrainian famine—in all the vile acts of the Soviet regime.”
Yet despite the fact that Solzhenitsyn called all peoples to repent for their evil acts, Jewish historian Yuri Slezkine writes,
“Like most attempts to apply the Christian concept of individual sin to nationalist demands for inherited tribal responsibility, Solzhenitsyn’s appeal envisions no ultimate absolution, no procedure for moral adjudication among competing claims, and no call on his own kinsmen to accept open-ended responsibility for the acts that any number of non-Russin peoples—or their self-appointed representatives—may consider both vile and ethnically Russian.”
The simple fact is that Solzhenitsyn’s observations about Jews during the Russian Revolution have been confirmed, even by Jews. Ginsberg writes, “In [Communist] Russia, Jews commanded powerful instruments of terror and repression.”
Likewise, twentieth century Russian historian Robert Service of Oxford thinks that Solzhenitsyn was “absolutely right.”
My simple question for Whittle is this: Does he think that Solzhenitsyn is an anti-Semite? If yes, why is he citing the work of an anti-Semite in his video propaganda?
If no, does he agree with the Solzhenitsyn quote as pointed out earlier? If yes, why doesn’t he tell us that in the video? What is he afraid of?
It is all the more despicable that Whittle mixed Putin with the Cheka, then the NKVD, and finally the KGB. Like Solzhenitsyn who got involved in the Bolshevik Revolution, Putin was indeed part of the KGB.
Like Solzhenitsyn, Putin became a Christian and renounced his KGP allegiance. And like Solzhenitsyn, Putin damned the Bolshevik Revolution as largely Jewish. He declared last year that the Soviet government “was 80-85 percent Jewish.”
Those Jews, continued Putin, were blinded by “false ideological considerations,” which led to moral and political terrorism on an entire nation.
It seemed that saying things like that was a terrible and unpardonable sin, and the Jewish neocons have been after Putin ever since.
If Whittle wants to be intellectually and historically fair and honest, why doesn’t he use similar equations to denounce people like Bill Kristol and the whole neoconservative kingdom? After all, aren’t they all former Trotskyists?
Former neoconservative luminary Francis Fukuyama of Stanford (formerly of Johns Hopkins) compares the neoconservative movement to Leninism. Neoconservatism, according to Fukuyama, is the reincarnation to some extent of both Leninism and Bolshevism.
Fukuyama’s observation makes sense when even Irving Kristol proudly admitted that the “honor I most prized was the fact that I was a member in good standing of the [Trotskyist] Young People’s Socialist League (Fourth International).”
Kristol was not just a former Trotskyist, but a former neo-Marxist, neo-socialist, and neo-liberal. And this neoconservative movement, as Jewish writer Sidney Blumenthal has shown, found its political and intellectual ideology “in the disputatious heritage of the Talmud.”
Even after the birth of the neoconservative movement, many of its members such as Stephen Schwartz of the Weekly Standard and Joan Wohlstetter of the RAND Corporation still had a burning thirst for Lev Davidovich Bronstein, known as Leon Trotsky.
If America has get into conflict with Putin for being a former KGB, then America has to prepare special prison cells all over the country for all the neoconservatives who plunged the country into a fierce conflict in Iraq and elsewhere. Remember what Paul Wolfowitz said?
When Wolfowitz was told by deputy national security advisor Stephen Hadley that there was no link between Al Qaeda and Saddam Hussein, Wolfowitz responded with certainty, “We’ll find it. It’s got to be there,” which is another way of saying that if it does not exist, they would make it up.
To sum up: should we really take Whittle seriously? Is he not an ideology whose purpose is to serve the Dreadful Few? Again, you be the judge:
So, Whittle wants the United States to go after ISIS, but the same Whittle cannot tell us where ISIS originated because that would destroy his Zionist propaganda.
If Obama goes after ISIS in Iraq, that means he has to go after ISIS in Syria. As Stars and Stripes reported,
“The U.S. and its allies are trying to hammer out a coalition to push back the Islamic State group in Iraq. But any serious attempt to destroy the militants or even seriously degrade their capabilities means targeting their infrastructure in Syria.”
If Obama does that, then logically he and other political figures would invariably have to join forces with Assad, who has been fighting factions of ISIS since the beginning of time.
And if he joins forces with Assad, then that means the United States spent millions upon millions of dollars supporting the Syrian rebels/jihadists for nothing! (At this present moment, “Obama pushes $5 billion counterterrorism fund to fight ISIS.”)
In fact, the New York Times has already reported that the Obama administration aspires to destroy “the terrorist army in its sanctuary inside Syria,” but “the plan might not be completed until the next administration.”
If the U.S. joins Assad, ISIS would be defeated in a matter of weeks or days. But that would logically lead that both the United States and Israel are terrorist states when they supported the Syrian rebels, and that would lead to the inevitable conclusions that the so-called war on terror is not only a sham but a carefully planned strategy used by the Zionist states to destroy countries that they do not like.
This also would give credence to the idea that “the great Islamophobic crusade” is really a sham.
Certainly no neoconservative/Zionist would want the United States to ally with Syria or Iran or Russia, and Jonathan S. Tobin of Commentary has already been on the front line saying that “in this case the enemy of our enemy isn’t necessarily our friend.”
In other words, we should never ally with Russia or Syria or Iran in order to defeat ISIS.
Yet retired General McInerney admits in a widely viewed interview that the United States indeed helped built ISIS:
“was sold to the terrorist group the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) by Syria’s ‘so-called moderate rebels…’ for something between $25,000 and $50,000”!
There is more sad news for the neoconservatives: “Islamic State fighters appear to be using captured US military issue arms and weapons supplied to moderate rebels in Syria by Saudi Arabia…”
So, shouldn’t the Zionists and Neo-Bolsheviks at least take some blame for the chaos in Syria and Iraq? Can Zionist politicians wash their hands so easily and say that they are all innocent? Should we not start collecting the neoconservatives en masse and send them to jail?
Who will hit the padded cells first: Bill Kristol, or Daniel Pipes, or Jonathan S. Tobin, or their Zionist puppets such as John McCain and Lindsey Graham?
 For further studies on this, see for example Kirk Spitzer, “Why Japan Is Still Not Sorry Enough,” Time, December 11, 2012.
 Erich Haberer, Jews and Revolution in Nineteenth-Century Russia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995); Albert S. Lindemann, Esau’s Tears: Anti-Semitism and the Rise of the Jews (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997); Israel Jacob Yuval, Two Nations in Your Womb: Perceptions of Jews and Christians in Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages (Berkley: University of California Press, 2006); Ruth Langer, Cursing the Christians?: A History of the Birkat HaMinim (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011); Ami Pedahzur and Arie Perliger, Jewish Terrorism in Israel (New York: Columbia University Press, 2011); Benny Morris, Righteous Victims: A History of the Zionist-Arab Conflict, 1881-2001 (New York: Vintage, 2001).
 Quoted in Paul R. Gregory, Terror by Quota: State Security from Lenin to Stalin (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009), 28.
 Edvard Radzinsky, Stalin: The First In-Depth Biography Based on Explosive New Documents from Russia’s Secret Archives (New York: Anchor Books, 1997), 239.
 Ibid., 240.
 Donald Rayfield, Stalin and His Hangmen: The Tyrant and Those Who Killed for Him (New York: Random House, 2004), 108.
 Ibid., 109.
 See for example Wendy Z. Goldman, Inventing the Enemy: Denunciation and Terror in Stalin’s Russia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011); Sheila Fitzpatrick, Everyday Stalinism: Ordinary Life in Extraordinary Times: Soviet Russia in the 1930s (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999).
 Sever Plocker, “Stalin’s Jews,” Y-Net News, December 21, 2006.
 For further studies on this and other related topics, see for example Yuri Slezkine, The Jewish Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004); Jerry Z. Muller, Capitalism and the Jews (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010); Norman M. Naimark, Stalin’s Genocide (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010); Alexander Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago (New York: Basic Books, 1997); Donald Rayfield, Stalin and His Hangmen: The Tyrant and Those Who Killed for Him (New York: Random House, 2004).
 Hoffman, Stalin’s War of Extermination, 196-197.
 Ibid., 197.
 Norman Naimark, Stalin’s Genocide (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010), 20.
 Norman Davies, “Russia: The Missing Link in Britain’s VE Day Mythology,” Sunday Times, May 1, 2005.
 “Russian Lawmakers Say Stalin Ordered Massacred of Polish Soldiers,” CNN, November 27, 2010.
 Allan Hall, “Has Historian Finally Discovered Real Reason for Hitler’s Obsessive Hatred of Jews?,” Daily Mail, June 19, 2009.
 See for example E. Michael Jones, Monsters from the ID: The Rise of Horror in Fiction and Film (Dallas: Spence Publishing, 2000, 134-138.
 Edward J. Bristow, Prostitution and Prejudice: The Jewish Fight Against White Slavery, 1870-1939 (New York: Schocken, 1983).
 Richard Pipes, “Solzhenitsyn and the Jews, Revisited,” The New Republic, Nov. 25, 2002.
 Nick Paton Walsh, “Solzhenitsyn Breaks Last Taboo of the Revolution,” Guardian, January 25, 2003.
 Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Solzhenitsyn Reader, 489.
 Ibid., 505.
 For an excellent treatise on this, see E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2008).
 See Iwo Cyprian Pogonowski, Jews in Poland: A Documentary History (New York: Hippocrene Books, 1993).
 See Keely Stauter-Halsted, “Jews as Middleman Minorities in Rural Poland: Understanding the Galician Pogroms of 1898,” Robert Bloblaum, ed., Anti-Semitism and its Opponents in Opponents in Modern Poland (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2005), chapter 2.
 Heinrich Graetz, History of the Jews (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America, 1894), 4:80-81.
 See for example Pawel Maciejko, The Mixed Multitude: Jacob Frank and the Frankish Movement, 1755-1816 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2011).
 See for example Matt Goldish, The Sabbatean Prophets (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2004), 4-5.
 We shall discuss this issue in a future article.
 See Jones, Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, chapter thirteen.
 See Edward J. Bristow, Prostitution and Prejudice: The Jewish Fight Against White Slavery, 1870-1939 (New York: Schocken, 1983).
 See Arno J. Mayer, Why Did the Heavens Not Darken?: The “Final Solution” in History (New York: Pantheon Books, 1988).
 See Jay A. Gertzman, Bookleggers and Smuthounds: The Trade in Erotica, 1920-1940 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999). Jewish scholar Joshua Lambert ended up saying the same thing but in an indirect and intellectually perverse way. Joshua Lambert, Unclean Lips: Jews, Obscenity, and American Culture (New York: New York University Press, 2013).
 Christian Neef and Matthias Schepp, “Spiegel Interview with Alexander Solzhenitsyn,” Spiegel, July 23, 2007.
Yuri Slezkine, The Jewish Century (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2004), 360.
 Ibid., 361.
 Benjamin Ginsberg, Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993), 57.
 Nick Paton Walsh, “Solzhenitsyn Breaks Last Taboo of the Revolution,” Guardian, January 25, 2003.
 Last Saturday, a group of friends and I were having dinner and the question was posed, “What do you say about Putin being a former KGB?” I said, “What do you say about Irving Kristol being a former Trotskyist?” There was a complete silence, and some of the individuals tried to choke in the background because they never thought about that before. After a good laugh, one individual then said, “All right. Let’s switch the topic.”
 “Putin: First Soviet Government Was Mostly Jewish,” Jerusalem Post, June 20, 2013.
 Quoted in J. J. Goldberg, “Putin: Jews Ruined Russia—But Now We’re Pals, Eh?,” Jewish Daily Forward, June 21, 2013.
 Francis Fukuyama, “After Neoconservatism,” NY Times, February 19, 2006.
 Stephen Halper and Jonathan Clarke, America Alone: The Neo-Conservatives and the Global Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004), 43.
 Meir Soloveichik, “Irving Kristol, Edmund Burke, and the Rabbis,” Jewish Review of Books, Number 6, Summer 2011.
 Sidney Blumenthal, The Rise fo the Counter-Establishment: From Conservative ideology to Political Power (New York: HarperCollins, 1998), 124.
 Craig Unger, The Fall of the House of Bush (New York: Scribner, 2007), 40-43.
 Thomas E. Ricks, “Fear Factor,” NY Times, October 5, 2012.
 Zeina Karam, “US Wary Over Hitting Syrian Militants,” Stars and Stripes, September 6, 2014.
 For a report on this, see for example Rajeev Syal, “David Cameron Must ‘Consider Cooperating with Syria’ to Crush ISIS,” Guardian, September 5, 2014.
 Eric Schmitt, Michael R. Gordon, and Helene Cooper, “Destroying ISIS May Take Years, U.S. Officials Say,” NY Times, September 7, 2014.
 Max Blumenthal, “The Great Islamophobic Crusade,” Huffington Post, December 20, 2010.
 Jonathan S. Tobin, “Will ISIS Help Pave the Way for Iranian Nuke?,” Commentary, September 3, 2014.