…by Jonas E. Alexis
Last month, Jim W. Dean predicted that the “Iran nuclear agreement [is the] biggest defeat” for AIPAC. That prediction turned out to be true.
AIPAC, a cell of Satan worshipers and New World Order agents and a group which positions itself as masters of foreign policy in America, was completely humiliated and then defeated last month. This has recently been recognized by the Washington Post itself at the beginning of this month. Flaming Neocon Jonathan S. Tobin lamented, “The Iran deal fight was won by Obama far more than it was lost by Netanyahu.” Take it from the Washington Post:
“Not since George H.W. Bush was president has the American Israel Public Affairs Committee sustained such a public defeat on an issue it deemed an existential threat to Israel’s security.
“But the Iran nuclear deal has Washington insiders wondering if the once-untouchable lobbying giant has suffered lasting damage to its near-pristine political reputation.
“In fighting the deal, AIPAC and its affiliates mustered all of its considerable resources: spending tens of millions on television ads in the home states of undecided lawmakers and organizing a fly-in to blitz lawmakers on Capitol Hill – another is planned for next week when Congress returns from August recess to vote on a resolution of disapproval.
“But all that noise amounted to a humbling and rare defeat this week, when President Obama secured a strong enough plurality in the Senate to protect the pact from efforts to dismantle it.
“Many say AIPAC’s efforts were doomed to fail in the aftermath of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s combative speech to Congress in March — an appearance brokered by Israel’s ambassador to the U.S. along with House Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) without White House consultation.
“Many of AIPAC’s supporters also blame President Obama and what they see as a process he rigged and a debate he polarized…
“‘The lesson that lawmakers have learned from this experience is that right-leaning pro-Israel groups are not immortal,’ said Dylan Williams, vice president of government affairs for J Street, a more liberal, rival pro-Israel group. ‘Blood can be drawn. And it is possible to stand up and say “no” to them. And not suffer political consequences.’
“AIPAC’s position on the Iran deal lines up with the Republican Party’s, but its efforts thus far have helped persuade only two Senate Democrats, and a handful in the House – while Obama has secured more than the 34 Senate votes to ensure that opponents won’t collect a two-thirds, veto-proof majority to block the deal. On Thursday, three more Senate Democrats sided with Obama — Heidi Heitkamp (N.D.), Cory Booker (N.J.), and Mark Warner (Va.).”
There is more. Netanyahu got another defeat, which means that his speech in the United States last March did not really help the Zionist cause. Again, the Washington Post declared:
“No political leader fought longer or harder against the Iran nuclear deal than Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who appears to have suffered the worst foreign policy defeat of his career following the announcement that President Obama has secured enough votes in the Senate to preserve the pact.”
Sure, both AIPAC and Netanyahu will be looking for plan B, since they are really upset at this present moment. In fact, Neocon Lee Smith says that “the fight over the Iran deal isn’t over.”
But the simple fact is that New World Order agents and Satan worshipers such as AIPAC and Netanyahu are beginning to recognize that they are not as immortal as they thought they were. “King Bibi” can politically bleed. And if he and AIPAC can bleed, then their Satanic plan can be killed as well.
Moreover, if Hegel and Solzhenitsyn are right, then Satan Worshipers and NWO agents will continue to bleed precisely because they are working against reason and truth, the very essence of a moral and harmonious universe. No matter what those NWO agents do, they will eventually and inevitably lose because reason will work itself out in the end, even in places we would not expect.
For example, who would have thought that Obama could have posed a serious challenge to AIPAC in 2015? Didn’t he previously give them carrots? Didn’t he make them feel at home in 2008? Yet by 2011, Obama was telling AIPAC that “I won’t back down on Israel-Palestine border issue.” By 2012, Obama was attacking those who wanted to promote a bloody war with Iran.
Granted, there is a sense that Obama has misread or misunderstood the Zionist position, and one can reasonably argue that he is part of the New World Order. How else would he support or authorize the destruction of thousands upon thousands of innocent civilians in places like Pakistan and Afghanistan and Yemen?
But the point here is that Obama seems to be getting tired of AIPAC and Netanyahu’s perpetual lies and fabrications. Now listen to the New York Times:
“The president accused Aipac of spending millions of dollars in advertising against the [Iran] deal and spreading false claims about it, people in the meeting recalled. So Mr. Obama told the Aipac leaders that he intended to hit back hard.
“The next day in a speech at American University, Mr. Obama denounced the deal’s opponents as ‘lobbyists’ doling out millions of dollars to trumpet the same hawkish rhetoric that had led the United States into war with Iraq. The president never mentioned Aipac by name, but his target was unmistakable.
“The remarks reflected an unusually sharp rupture between a sitting American president and the most potent pro-Israel lobbying group, which was founded in 1951 a few years after the birth of Israel.”
So, NWO agents are not really confident that they will sit on the Zionist throne forever. This is probably one reason why they are very scared. They seem to perceive that they are doomed to fail, even though they are currently enjoying tremendous seasonal power. Listen to NWO representative Jacob J. Lew (secretary of the Treasury): “The Iran nuclear deal offers a long-term solution to one of the most urgent threats of our time.”
In a similar vein, Jennifer Rubin cried out:
“The Iran deal is as big a threat to Israel as any event since the 1973 Yom Kippur War. The American people as a whole by a large majority oppose it, and yet a Democrat from New Jersey, Sen. Cory Booker, who has had excellent relations with the pro-Israel community, cannot bring himself to oppose the deal even after it is certain there are enough votes to sustain a veto.”
What Rubin did not tell her readers is that if Americans aren’t manipulated by the Zionist media—and by AIPAC specifically—they would almost certainly choose the Iran deal. In fact, it was reported last March that “most Americans back Iran deal.” In contrast to Rubin’s assertion, William Booth of the Washington Post itself has reported just two days ago:
“Yet recent polling is not so definitive. According to a survey released this week by the University of Maryland’s Program for Public Consultation, Americans narrowly support the deal, with 52 percent wanting Congress to approve it and 47 percent wanting the pact rejected. Other polls have shown greater opposition.”
So, there is reason to be optimistic. Whatever comes out of the Iran deal, NWO agents and Satan worshipers definitely know that they can bleed pretty bad. They can say some of the most disgusting things about Iran and foreign policy, but we as representatives of Logos will do our best to expose them for promoting lies and fabrications in the world.
Let us continue to tell them that we are not for sale. Let us continue expose their Satanic ideology, which, as Solzhenitsyn would have forcefully put it, is a “gangrenous edge” and a “decomposing garb.”
 What I mean by the terms “Satan worshipers” and “NWO agents” is that those people are anti-reason and are working day and night to attack the moral and political order in both its metaphysical and practical sense. I am certainly working with St. Athanasius’ definition of being Satanic: “St. Athanasius established the principle that being against Logos is synonymous with being Satanic.” Cited in E. Michael Jones, “The Great Satan and Me: Reflections on Iran and Postmodernism’s Faustian Pact,” Culture Wars, July/August 2015.
 See for example David Ignatius, “Benjamin Netanyahu faces a stark dilemma in the Iran nuclear deal,” Washington Post, September 3, 2015.
 Jonathan S. Tobin, “Did Netanyahu Lose the Iran Deal Fight for AIPAC?,” Commentary, September 3, 2015.
 Karoun Demirjian and Carol Morello, “How AIPAC Lost the Iran Deal Fight,” Washington Post, September 3, 2015.
 William Booth, “Netanyahu seeks to snatch victory from jaws of defeat on Iran deal,” Washington Post, September 3, 2015.
 Lee Smith, “Obama’s Victory Is Iran’s Victory,” Weekly Standard, September 14, 2015, Vol. 21, NO. 01.
 “Transcript: Obama’s Speech at AIPAC,” National Public Radio, June 4, 2008.
 Brad Knickerbocker, “Obama to AIPAC: I won’t back down on Israel-Palestine border issue,” Christian Science Monitor, May 22, 2011.
 Helene Cooper, “‘Loose Talk of War’ Only Helps Iran, President Says,” NY Times, March 4, 2012.
 See for example Steve Coll, “The Unblinking Stare: The Drone War in Pakistan,” New Yorker, November 24, 2014; “Warren Weinstein and the Long Drone War,” New Yorker, April 23, 2015; Matt Sledge, “The Toll Of 5 Years Of Drone Strikes: 2,400 Dead,” Huffington Post, May 15, 2014; “Obama’s high-stakes drone war in Yemen,” CNN, April 21, 2014; Glenn Greenwald, “New Stanford/NYU study documents the civilian terror from Obama’s drones,” Guardian, September 25, 2012; “Drone Strikes Under Scrutiny,” NY Times, February 6, 2013; Michael B. Kelley, “President Obama’s Super Aggressive Drone War In One Graphic,” Business Insider, December 14, 2013; Jon Swaine, “Barack Obama ‘has authority to use drone strikes to kill Americans on US soil,’” Telegraph, March 6, 2013; Jo Becker and Scott Shane, “Secret ‘Kill List’ Proves a Test of Obama’s Principles and Will,” NY Times, May 29, 2012.
 This is a true statement. See for example “Pro-Israel Aipac Creates Group to Lobby Against the Iran Deal,” NY Times, July 17, 2015.
 Julie Hirschfeld Davis, “Fears of Lasting Rift as Obama Battles Pro-Israel Group on Iran,” NY Times, August 7, 2015; for other reports, see also “It’s Either Iran Nuclear Deal or ‘Some Form of War,’ Obama Warns,” NY Times, August 5, 2015.
 Jacob J. Lew, “The High Price of Rejecting the Iran Deal,” NY Times, August 13, 2015.
 Jennifer Rubin, “Sen. Booker ends the myth of bipartisan support for Israel,” Washington Post, September 3, 2015.
 David Jackson, “Poll: Most Americans back Iran deal,” USA Today, March 31, 2015.
 Booth, “Netanyahu seeks to snatch victory from jaws of defeat on Iran deal,” Washington Post, September 3, 2015.
 See for example Michael Rubin, “Is North Korea Blame Game Future of the Iran Deal?,” Commentary, September 2, 2015.
 Alexander Solzhenitsyn, The Solzhenitsyn Reader (Wilmington: ISI Books, 2006), 558.
Jonas E. Alexis has degrees in mathematics and philosophy. He studied education at the graduate level. His main interests include U.S. foreign policy, history of Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the new book Zionism vs. the West: How Talmudic Ideology is Undermining Western Culture. He teaches mathematics in South Korea.