Anti-New World Order Rises

0
1072

america

…by Jonas E. Alexis

 

We are at the end of 2015, and one can say that it has not been a really smooth ride for the New World Order. This is not to say that NWO agents cease to exert an enormously powerful influence on world affairs. What it does mean is that NWO agents now know that things do not usually go according to plan. They know that they cannot quickly shout victory anymore.

In October of last year, the Obama administration got tired of Benjamin Netanyahu as a pathological liar and blood sucker and ended up calling him “a chickenshit.” This move immediately put the “crisis in the U.S.-Israel relationships” back on the table.[1]

During the same year, Vladimir Putin got into to the political ring and challenged New World Order agents.[2] This eventually led to the inevitable fact that NWO agents created terrorist cells like ISIS. We now know that for the U.S. to send troops to Syria to fight ISIS is, as Jim W. Dean has recently put it, “window dressing.” He wrote:

“We have state-sponsored people backing terrorists now for years and it has now become a ‘ho-hum’ type of thing, and that is the biggest danger that we have here…that countries can continue to do this simply by saying we are “pursuing our interests.

“It is against all the international laws. It basically gives everyone else, including terrorist organizations, the right to pay no attention to the laws either. So it puts us, the public, in a bigger threat from more state-sponsored terrorism and regular terrorism.”

Putin’s move obviously took NWO agents by surprise. Chrystia Freeland of Politico noted then:

“The war between Russia and Ukraine erupted so unexpectedly and escalated so quickly that it is tempting to think the motivations of the combatants are complicated or obscure.”[3]





As a puppet of the New World Order, Freeland was so confused that she irrationally and perversely declared, “Vladimir Putin is seeking to rewrite [geopolitical] rules himself, and we don’t know what the Russian president believes the new rules should be.”[4]

Freeland could not see that Putin did not invent those geopolitical rules and practical reason but discovered them. As Kevin Barrett would have put it, Freeland could not see that Putin was just putting the fear of God in the New World Order.

Moving on to March of this year, forrmer Mossad chief Meir Dagan called Netanyahu’s Iran speech “bullshit.”[5] Dagan added that Netanyahu’s policy is actually hastening the “end of the Zionist dream.”[6]


chrystia-freeland
Chrystia Freeland

Well, the New World Order continues to receive a heavy blow precisely because it is illogical, untenable, and repugnant. Some of its greatest proponents can never cease to propound one nonsense after another. Here is a classic example.

Michelle Malka Grossman of the Jerusalem Post just recently stripped herself of her political clothes when she basically reported that the Michigan city of Detroit is being anti-Semitic for displaying a billboard which reads: “America First Not Israel.”[7]

Is there something wrong with the billboard? According to the founding fathers of America, no. But according to the Zionist premise, yes. What Grossman ends up reporting is that being a true American is intrinsically anti-Semitic! According to this logic, the founding fathers were anti-Semitic as well.

Thomas Jefferson himself would have almost certainly dumped Israel. “Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations – entangling alliances with none,” he said. In a similar vein, George Washington argued that there ought to be no “foreign attachments” with other nations. He added back in 1796:

The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible.”

So, what would Grossman, AIPAC, the Neo-Conservatives, and the Zionist puppets say to Washington and Jefferson? How can those puppets pretend to maintain the constitution and then disregard what those founders said about a vitally important issue? Why are they picking and choosing? How can terrorist supporters and apologists such as John McCain and Lindsey Graham talk about Washington and Jefferson and then ignore what they said on foreign policy?

It simply doesn’t add up.

Grossman wrote:

“In an interview with Detroit’s WXYZ radio, a Fox News affiliate, the Anti-Defamation League’s Heidi Budaj said that the ad and its choice of location is trying to ‘drive a wedge between the American people and the State of Israel.’”[8]

Well, duh! Washington and Jefferson drove the wedge between the United States and other countries centuries ago. Putin is indirectly taking that wedge and cutting NWO agents to pieces with it. This is why they are really mad. Their plan is so diabolical that they have bombed a Russian airliner to perpetuate wars in much of the world.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wkoPlKKMQc


[1] Jeffrey Goldberg, “The Crisis in U.S.-Israel Relations Is Officially Here,” Atlantic, October 28, 2014.

[2] “Putin calls for a new world order,” The Australian, July 14, 2014.

[3] Chrystia Freeland, “What Will Putin’s New World Order Be?,” Politico, September 17, 2014.

[4] Ibid.

[5] Avi Lewis, “Ex-Mossad chief calls Netanyahu’s Iran speech ‘bullshit,’” Times of Israel, March 5, 2015; “Ex-Mossad chief pans Netanyahu’s ‘bulls—‘ speech to Congress,” Jerusalem Post, March 6, 2015.

[6] Lewis, “Ex-Mossad chief calls Netanyahu’s Iran speech ‘bullshit,’” Times of Israel, March 5, 2015.

[7] “Anti-Israel billboard causing controversy in Detroit,” Jerusalem Post, October 26, 2015.

[8] Ibid.

Author Details
Read Jonas Alexis’s latest posts here >>>

Jonas E. Alexis has degrees in mathematics and philosophy. He studied education at the graduate level. His main interests include U.S. foreign policy, history of Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the new book Zionism vs. the West: How Talmudic Ideology is Undermining Western Culture. He teaches mathematics in South Korea.
ATTENTION READERS
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy