Jewish Projection For Christmas

23
103

By Gilad Atzmon

One day before Christmas, the Israeli embassy in Ireland posted a message on its Facebook page that said that if Jesus and Mary were alive today in Bethlehem, they would probably be lynched by local Arabs.

The Israeli Right Wing media outlet Arutz 7 described it as “(a) thought for Christmas”, explaining to their readers that “If Jesus and Mother Mary were alive today, they would, as Jews without security, probably end up being lynched in Bethlehem by hostile Palestinians. Just a thought …”

Yet the Israeli diplomats in Ireland must surely know very well that, according to the Christian Gospels, it was actually the Sanhedrin who pushed for the crucifixion of Jesus: though the Gospels plainly depict the Roman Pontius Pilate as the author of the Crucifixion of Jesus Christ, it clearly suggests in the following verses that Pilate was subject to the incitement of the ‘Jewish’ Sanhedrin — 12: And Pilate answered and said again unto them, What will ye then that I shall do unto Him Whom ye call the King of the Jews? 13: And they cried out again, Crucify Him. 14: Then Pilate said unto them, Why, what evil hath He done? And they cried out the more exceedingly, Crucify Him (Mark 15:12-14).

But I guess that the Israeli diplomats in Ireland must have realised that their Hasbara attempt was counterproductive and would likely backfire, for they were very quick to remove the above FB post and apologise.

And yet, one possible explanation for their regretful Facebook post is projection. Psychological projection is commonly defined as a tendency to subconsciously deny one’s own attributes, thoughts, and emotions, which are then ascribed to other people.

Tragically enough, excommunication (Herem) and lynching are embedded in every form of Jewish political and cultural thinking, be it Left, Right or Centre. Every too often we detect a Zionist or Jewish ‘progressive’ campaign against those whom ‘some Jews’ regard as the ‘enemy of the tribe’.

Sadly enough, the inclination towards lynching ‘a la Sanhedrin’ is deeply rooted in Jewish political thought: sometimes it is performed by Zionist lobbies such as AIPAC. In the last week, for instance, we followed the American Jewish Lobby’s push for the political annihilation of Chuck Hagel. On other occasions, the exact same exercise is performed by the so-called ‘progressive Jews’ such as HRW, JVP, IJAN and Mondoweiss who also follow the Sanhedrin’s modus operandi, trying to destroy their critics by means of political lynching or by proxy.

And just like the Zionists, the so-called ‘anti’ Zionists will use every trick in the ‘tribal manual’ – they would call for excommunication (herem); they would demand disavowal, and like the Sanhedrin, they would search for their contemporaneous Pontius Pilate, who is stupid enough to agree to go down in history as their Sabbath Goy.

However, I do believe that both Zionists and ‘anti’ Zionists should start to consider very seriously what they are doing: they should grasp that as time goes by, their opponents will gather a deeper understanding of Jewish culture and power.

I myself take some credit for this: my latest book helped many to understand the continuum between Jewishness, Zionism and power. I also managed to dismantle the imaginary distinction between the ‘Zionist’ and the so-called ‘anti’ Zionist, and I guess that by now we are capable of detecting the controlled opposition within our ranks.

Interestingly enough, it took the Israeli Embassy in Ireland just a few hours to realise that they had gone one step too far. Seemingly, The Israeli foreign office was very quick to issue an apology. But our Jewish ‘anti’ Zionists are yet to apologise to Greta Berlin, Prof’ Finkelstein, Prof’ Richard Falk myself and many others for their relentless harassment campaigns against us.

The explanation for it all may be rather simple – in terms of awareness, ideology and consciousness, the Israelis are probably slightly ahead of their ‘anti’ Zionist twins: at least the Israeli diplomats were quick to realise that they were caught projecting their symptoms onto the Palestinian peoples. The Jewish ‘anti’ Zionists though, are failing on that front because they are still saturated with their own sense of ‘progressive righteousness’.

‘Progressiveness’ is a tribal inclinations and should be realised as a secular replacement for  ‘chosen-ness’. Being ‘progressive’ implies that someone else must be ‘reactionary’.  Jewish ‘progressiveness’  should be grasped, therefore’ as a ‘kosher secular supremacy’. It stands in total opposition to the idea of equality, human brotherhood and universalism. The so-called Jewish ‘progressive anti Zionist’ is subject to a self-imposed blindness and I believe that he or she have a lot to reflect upon in those regards. Yet,  by judging their general reaction to criticism, I am not so sure that this is ever going to happen.

SHARE
Previous articlePentagon Held Secret Meeting With Nuclear Industry 2003
Next articleTop 10 Veterans Stories in Today’s News – December 26, 2012
Gilad Atzmon

Gilad Atzmon is an Israeli-born British jazz saxophonist, novelist, political activist and writer.

Atzmon’s album Exile was BBC jazz album of the year in 2003. Playing over 100 dates a year,[4] he has been called “surely the hardest-gigging man in British jazz.” His albums, of which he has recorded nine to date, often explore the music of the Middle East and political themes. He has described himself as a “devoted political artist.” He supports the Palestinian right of return and the one-state solution in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

His criticisms of Zionism, Jewish identity, and Judaism, as well as his controversial views on The Holocaust and Jewish history have led to allegations of antisemitism from both Zionists and anti-Zionists. A profile in The Guardian in 2009 which described Atzmon as “one of London’s finest saxophonists” stated: “It is Atzmon’s blunt anti-Zionism rather than his music that has given him an international profile, particularly in the Arab world, where his essays are widely read.”

His new book The Wandering Who? is now availble at Amazon.com

23 COMMENTS

  1. In Our Ancient European religions there isn’t any jesus, moses mohammed or any of the semitic gawds just real dieties based on real facets of Nature. We never wanted the dead jew or his daddy jehovah. Everything written in the jew bible, torah or talumd is nothing but lies and stolen occult knowledge.

  2. What is chilling and inadmissible is that the Israeli Embassy in Ireland can scot-free walk away from its manipulative-false-Palestinophobic allegation.

    The afterward given excuses are just a trick, giving the impression that it was a “mistake”. LOL.

    Once the damage has been done, no excuse can undo it. Though, it is very probable that the underlying motive for such a weird behavior is to be found within the mindset of the Jews and how they are irremediably conditioned to project their own crimes and misdeeds unto those they consider as their enemies.

  3. Jesus not only ranted against the Israeli leaders of his day, he hurled many expletives toward them, condemning them for their ultimate sin, which was claiming to represent God when what they really represented was the devil, the father of lies. It’s perfectly understandable that the pharisees would want him dead. And not merely dead, but dead with extreme prejudice.

  4. Anti-Zionist Zionist (and Atzmon detractor) Tony Greenstein even admitted that being publicly against Zionism was important to counter the bad will generated against Jews by Israel.

  5. Ironic that most USian Christians accept Judaism as a legitimate “fellow religion” while demonizing Islam, since of course Islam considers Jesus a holy prophet of a “prior revealed religion”, and most Muslims follow his name with “Peace be upon him” just as they do for the prophet Muhammad.

  6. On the web site: ifamericansknew.com, they are offering a post card with a picture of the holy family, Joseph, and pregnant Mary on donkey. Bethlehem in backgrownd with the huge concrete separation wall keeping the holy family out. Priceless.

    Joy to the world,
    Infidel

  7. I think Dadee Bush – how is he? – made a similar remark….if the public knew what we were doing to them, we would all be swinging from lamp posts……or words to that affect.

  8. Thank you Mr. Atzmon:

    For an unbiased research about this and other related subjects I’d like to refer readers to the only known comprehensive source of written ancient history which is proved to have remained in its original form (namely the Holy Koran/Quran unaltered for over 1400 years).
    ****************http://quran.com

    Once in the Quran website a search for Jesus returns this page with 69 verses (hits) all of which can be viewed by clicking on NEXT at bottom right of page:

    ***********http://quran.com/search?q=jesus&page=1

    But above pages show only beginning of each verse not the whole text of each verse. So to get to full text of each verse reader can click on the actual number of the verse at left side (like 2:87) and a complete verse like this one appears:

    *************http://quran.com/2/87

    Now at top of such a page by clicking on “MORE CONTEXT” you can see the verses before & after the above full verse. When the new page comes up you can again click on “MORE CONTEXT” & it expands to include additional full verses before & after your previous page.

    For another research put the word “ USURY” in the search box and follow the same method.

    As Christian, Jew, or Moslem, you’d be amazed at what you read!!!

    Note to Christians: Allah = God (not the person of Jesus). This is critical to know when reading the Quran (in order to prevent misunderstandings).

  9. Still speaking for everyone then. That old self chosen “mandate”.Troll too huh? Projection is all you are good for.

  10. Given the Sandy Hook incident, it looks like they consider infant females a threat, too. They can’t be kings, obviously, but the can be ARMED.

  11. Exactly…well said. The only reason they show concern for any “oppressed minority” anywhere is bc they know that if the goyim filth ever wake-up they’ll be banished fm country to country once again…as they, for the most part, richly deserve.

  12. No they don’t know when to stop…How can they when no one ever tells them to? To Pilate Jeshua was just another Jew…and yet he did have a strong sense of justice…”Why….what evil has He done..” “See to Him yourselves…” “and who shall I release Barrabas..( scumbag murderer ) or Jeshua…?” And we know their response and their threat to incite an uprising…

  13. And perhaps the Israeli Embassy should explain why they saw fit to magnify the pain and anguish of the Anglo-Irish conflict for all parties concerned by bringing Mossad into the mix in the 1970’s. They just don’t know when to stop.

  14. Perhaps the israeli embassy in Ireland is to tact and diplomacy – what King Herod was to babysitting services.

  15. Perhaps the israeli embassy in Ireland have forgotten that in REALITY – the biggest danger to the life and limb as far as the infant Jesus was concerned – was an edict by the jewish King Herod to have every male child of two years and under slaughtered. This “Just to make sure” that they exterminated anyone that might one day become a King and a potential rival. A harbinger of things to come.

    Herod’s plan did not succeed as Jesus was quickly evacuated from the area to avoid the mass murder of small children. This is perhaps not a subject or memory that the israelis might want to conjure back up – bearing in mind current events.

  16. When Jews are socalled against injustice practised by Jews they almost always do that : 1) to control the opposition, 2) to spread the idea that there are also “good Jews”, in short they don’t do it for real moral reasons but for their tribal interests. That is why they always do it “as Jews” (Jews against this, Jews against that). Contrary to their “universalist” posturing they are and remain a tribe pursuing tribal interests.

    When Jews act as “progressives” then that is simply a secular version of their “chosen people” complex. Only the moral superior Jews are worthy to lead humanity to Utopia (which more often than not appears to be a dystopia).

  17. Jesus in the Talmud:

    Horrible Blasphemies Against Jesus Christ

    1) He and his disciples practiced sorcery and black magic, led Jews astray into idolatry, and were sponsored by foreign, gentile powers for the purpose of subverting Jewish worship (Sanhedrin 43a).

    2) He was sexually immoral, worshipped statues of stone (a brick is mentioned), was cut off from the Jewish people for his wickedness, and refused to repent (Sanhedrin 107b; Sotah 47a).

    3) He learned witchcraft in Egypt and, to perform miracles, used procedures that involved cutting his flesh, which is also explicitly banned in the Bible (Shabbos 104b).

    Gittin 57a. Says Jesus is in hell, being boiled in “hot excrement.”

    Sanhedrin 43a. Says Jesus (“Yeshu” and in Soncino footnote #6, Yeshu “the Nazarene”) was executed because he practiced sorcery: “It is taught that on the eve of Passover Jesus was hung, and forty days before this the proclamation was made: Jesus is to be stoned to death because he has practiced sorcery and has lured the people to idolatry…He was an enticer and of such thou shalt not pity or condone.”

    “The Editio Princeps of the complete Code of Talmudic Law, Maimonides’ Mishneh Torah — replete not only with the most offensive precepts against all Gentiles but also with explicit attacks on Christianity and on Jesus (after whose name the author adds piously, ‘May the name of the wicked perish’)… –Dr. Israel Shahak, Jewish History, Jewish Religion, p. 21.

    “The Talmud contains a few explicit references to Jesus…These references are certainly not complimentary…There seems little doubt that the account of the execution of Jesus on the eve of Passover does refer to the Christian Jesus…The passage in which Jesus’ punishment in hell is described also seems to refer to the Christian Jesus. It is a piece of anti-Christian polemic dating from the post-70 CE period…” –Hyam Maccoby, Judaism on Trial, pp. 26-27.

    “According to the Talmud, Jesus was executed by a proper rabbinical court for idolatry, inciting other Jews to idolatry, and contempt of rabbinical authority. All classical Jewish sources which mention his execution are quite happy to take responsibility for it; in the talmudic account the Romans are not even mentioned.

    “The more popular accounts–which were nevertheless taken quite seriously–such as the notorious Toldot Yeshu are even worse, for in addition to the above crimes they accuse him of witchcraft. The very name ‘Jesus’ was for Jews a symbol of all that is abominable and this popular tradition still persists…

Comments are closed.