by Jonas E. Alexis
One can say that Ann Coulter’s career as a New York Times best-selling author and political commentator was officially over yesterday. In fact, the Jewish World Review, which had always published Coulter’s confusing and unbalanced polemics for at least fifteen years, has recently dumped her.
Coulter got tired of the GOP presidential candidates talking about how good they will be to Israel and even to Jews without emphasizing or concentrating on some of the main issues facing America. Coulter then twitted:
“How many f—ing Jews do these people think there are in the United States?”
Coulter had more to say:
“How to get applause from GOP donors: 1) Pledge to start a war 2) Talk about job creators 3) Denounce abortion 4) Cite Reagan 5) Cite Israel…. How about Huckabee, Rubio, Kasich etc talk about Israel’s sturdy and effective border fence?
“Cruz, Huckabee Rubio all mentioned ISRAEL in their response to: ‘What will AMERICA look like after you are president.’”
One can say that Coulter includes unnecessary and stupid obscenity in her statement because she is incapable of addressing the fundamental issues, which we have been discussing since the past two years or so.
“She could have been drunk, she could have been high, I don’t know, I have to give her the benefit of the doubt…but I don’t have to delude myself. Pandering to Jewish money is about as anti-Semitic a stereotype as you could put forth. Her ‘eff-ing Jews’ comment is not identifying Israel—it’s identifying Jews, plural, and all Jews. There is no excuse for that. You can’t just wiggle out of something that vile and hateful.”
Tom Sykes of the Daily Beast wrote, “The whole argument echoes a historic libel against Jews that they hold secret influence.”
Sykes is a classic representation of what one ought to call a complete moron. First of all, it is not a secret that the Dreadful Few wield enormous power in much of the world, most particularly in the American culture.
If Sykes does not think so, then we would like to invite him to check out Neal Gabler’s Empire of Their Own, Benjamin Ginsberg’s Fatal Embrace: Jews and the State, Yuri Slezkine’s The Jewish Century, Eric Haberer’s Jews and Revolution in Nineteenth-Century Russia, Nathan Abrams’ The New Jew in Film, Omer Bartov’s The “Jew” in Cinema, Henry Bial’s Acting Jewish, Hollywood’s Chosen People, Josh Lambert’s Unclean Lips, among other scholarly works. Volumes of scholarly studies have been written on this very issue, and it is really stupid to ignore those works. Jewish writer J. J. Goldberg for example entitled his book Jewish Power: Inside the American Jewish Establishment. Is Goldberg anti-Semitic for coming up with such a daring title?
If Sykes is not prepared to spend some time delving into this issue from a purely scholarly point of view, then we should challenge him to read Joel Stein’s LA Times article, “Who runs Hollywood,” in which he wrote:
“I have never been so upset by a poll in my life. Only 22% of Americans now believe “the movie and television industries are pretty much run by Jews,” down from nearly 50% in 1964…
“How deeply Jewish is Hollywood? When the studio chiefs took out a full-page ad in the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago to demand that the Screen Actors Guild settle its contract, the open letter was signed by: News Corp. President Peter Chernin (Jewish), Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey (Jewish), Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Robert Iger (Jewish), Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton (surprise, Dutch Jew), Warner Bros. Chairman Barry Meyer (Jewish), CBS Corp. Chief Executive Leslie Moonves (so Jewish his great uncle was the first prime minister of Israel), MGM Chairman Harry Sloan (Jewish) and NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker (mega-Jewish). If either of the Weinstein brothers had signed, this group would have not only the power to shut down all film production but to form a minyan with enough Fiji water on hand to fill a mikvah…
“The Jews are so dominant, I had to scour the trades to come up with six Gentiles in high positions at entertainment companies. When I called them to talk about their incredible advancement, five of them refused to talk to me, apparently out of fear of insulting Jews. The sixth, AMC President Charlie Collier, turned out to be Jewish.
“As a proud Jew, I want America to know about our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood. Without us, you’d be flipping between ‘The 700 Club’ and ‘Davey and Goliath on TV all day. So I’ve taken it upon myself to re-convince America that Jews run Hollywood by launching a public relations campaign because that’s what we do best.”
Stein concluded his article with the following sentence:
“I don’t care if Americans think we’re running the news media, Hollywood, Wall Street or the government. I just care that we get to keep running them.”
One last example for Sykes:
“Bill Stadium, a former Harvard-educated Wall Street lawyer who is now a screenwriter in LA, told me that he recently came across an old WASP friend in an LA restaurant who had been president of the Porcellian at Harvard—the most exclusive undergraduate dining club. His friend—a would-be producer—was dressed in a black nylon tracksuit and had gold chains on his wrist; dangling around his neck was a chunky Star of David. Stadium asked: ‘Why hell are you dressed like that?’ The WASP replied: ‘I’m trying to look Jewish.’”
It certainly is frustrating when people like Sykes cannot take responsibility for their thick-headedness.
Going back to Coulter. In her defence, she declared that her comments were “pro-Semitic.” John Podhoretz, one of the leading Jewish Neocons in America, responded, “Holy shit, Ann. Shame on you.”
I am really confused here because I have read much of what Coulter has written over the past ten years or so. She has been a puppet of the Dreadful Few for her entire career, and now she is blaming the GOP presidential candidates for being useful idiots. Didn’t Bush do the same thing? Didn’t “Prince of Darkness” Richard Perle brag that Bush “did not make decisions, in part because the machinery of government that he nominally ran was actually running him”?
Doesn’t Coulter defend Bush in virtually all her books? Didn’t Bush use deliberate lies to invade Iraq? Weren’t Jewish Neocons the key players pushing the button? Lest we be accused of something weird, listen again to NWO agent Thomas L. Friedman. He said that the war in Iraq
“was disseminated by a small group of 25 or 30 neoconservatives, almost all of them Jewish, almost all of them intellectuals (a partial list: Richard Perle, Paul Wolfowitz, Douglas Feith, William Kristol, Eliot Abrams, Charles Krauthammer), people who are mutual friends and cultivate one another and are convinced that political ideas are a major driving force of history.”
So, if Coulter wants to be serious, then she needs to start apologizing to the people who plunked down the money to buy her books. She needs to start refunding millions of dollars to her favourite fans. She also needs to start fresh. Until then, we will still have to place her in the Zionist/Neoconservative/Neo-Bolshevik matrix. She is still a Zionist whore. But I really can’t wait to see what she will say in her next book–and where that book will be published!
I can predict that Coulter will no longer write books for major publishers such as Crown Forum. In response to Coulter’s statement, Jolkovsky said:
“It’s like when you have a friend and then the friend totally disses you, [even though] you’ve always been there for that friend. It hurts.”
So, Coulter screwed things up bad. She hurts the Dreadful Few, and obviously, they will make her pay for her unpardonable sin. She will have a hard time making a living for the next few years or so. She better starts saving every penny that she got from deluding the masses with her books because she is going to need every single one of those pennies. Remember what happened to Norman Finkelstein?
Oh, Coulter. What hast thou done? And who is going to come out of the closet next? Thomas Sowell? Bill O’Reilly? Sean Hannity? Sarah Palin? Michelle Bachmann? John McCain?
We are certainly living in an exciting time.
 Tom Sykes, “Trump Supporter Ann Coulter Slams Pandering to ‘F—ing Jews,” Daily Beast, September 17, 2015; see also “Ann Coulter Accuses Republican Candidates of Pandering to ‘F—ing Jews,’” Haaretz, September 17, 2015.
 “Conservative pundit Ann Coulter tweets about the ‘f—ing Jews,’ sparking controversy,” Jerusalem Post, September 17, 2015.
 Sykes, “Trump Supporter Ann Coulter Slams Pandering to ‘F—ing Jews,” Daily Beast, September 17, 2015
 Joel Stein, “Who runs Hollywood? C’mon,” LA Times, December 19, 2008.
 Cited in E. Michael Jones, The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (South Bend: Fidelity Press, 2008), 1035.
 We can play the anti-Semitic card here and discover that Coulter’s point, if we go along with the Holocaust establishment, is quite foolish. But time will fail us.
 David Rose, “Neo Culpa,” Vanity Fair, November 3, 2006.
 See for example John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt, The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy (New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2007); Paul R. Pillar, Intelligence and U.S. Foreign Policy: Iraq, 9/11, and Misguided Reform (New York: Columbia University Press, 2011); Vincent Bugliosi, The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder (New York: Perseus Books, 2008).
 Ari Shavit, “White Man’s Burden,” Haaretz, May 4, 2003.
Jonas E. Alexis has degrees in mathematics and philosophy. He studied education at the graduate level. His main interests include U.S. foreign policy, the history of the Israel/Palestine conflict, and the history of ideas. He is the author of the new book Zionism vs. the West: How Talmudic Ideology is Undermining Western Culture. He teaches mathematics in South Korea.