The “Times Square Bomb”

21
1551

A possible set-up to attack Pakistan..?

By Sajid Ansari

Yes, it may be true, in the wake of “Times-Square Bomb”, possibly a ‘set-up’ plan made by the CIA and Mossad, to create pleas and justifications to attack and invade Pakistan, as a last resort, after failing to achieve the “desired objectives” to denuclearize Pakistan, exactly as they did to Iraq on a fake CIA Report of the presence of WMDs in Iraq and then US President acted as a stooge in the hands of CIA and Pentagon and attacked Iraq and later on confessed that it was an unconfirmed Report.  How easy it was to say after killing millions of innocent Muslim civilians and bringing devastation to a country, George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and their other accomplices must be tried at The Hague for war crimes and crime against humanity.

However, in the case of Pakistan, after miserably failing to lay hands onto Pakistani nuclear sites and arsenals, through the TTP-Pakistani Taliban and Indian army infiltrators in the cities of then MWFP province of Pakistan, now US/CIA and Mossad have possibly ‘set-up’ a plan to attack  Pakistan taking the plea of ‘Times-Square Bomb’, and they will as they don’t have time because Obama has asked them to “to finish the job” by July, 2011.

In my last article “Nuclear Attack Threat by USA”, published in the Frontier Post, dated 16th April, 2010, I have written that the Secretary of State Ms Hillary Clinton, and the Defense Secretary Robert Gates, have issued a joint statement on Sunday, 11th April, 2010, in  television interviews that Iran and North Korea represented exceptions to the limits on a US nuclear response, as both had defied UN resolutions on their atomic programme. Ms Clinton clearly said, “The United States could not rule out using nuclear weapons if it comes under biological attack.”

The vital question is why on earth both these top US diplomats, felt a need to issue such a statement. Therefore, I foresee a possible pre-emptive (nuclear) attack by US and NATO on Pakistan, in collaboration with India, justifying to eradicate “terrorism breeding” in Pakistan and a possible use of nukes by Pakistani “terrorists”. Though I had rated the attack on Pakistan as the second possibility as the first probability of a possible nuclear attack was Iran, in view of the statements issued by Ms Clinton and Robert gates, my previous article, but now after the “Times-Square Bomb” incident it is Pakistan which is possibly going to be attacked any time in the next winter.

The US administration adding 30,000 more troops, coming to Afghanistan in June, 2010 plus 7,000 troops promised by NATO whereas they already have 110,000, therefore, logically speaking, what these additional 37,000 troops could do what 110,000 troops could not do in 9 years…? So why do they need 37,000 more troops…? In fact they need these forces to enter into Pakistan after a brutal attack by USAF, may be more than what they did at Tora Bora, using nukes as well, if need be. The USA’s three fleets, which I call USA’s “hegemonic floating terrorism”,  were stationed in the Persian Gulf have been ordered to shift to the Arabian Sea, last year, and they all have nukes on them. One of the USAF aircraft which was carrying nukes for these fleets, flew across from the west coast over flying different cities of mid-west and the east coast, was vehemently criticized by the US media of flying over US cities with nukes onboard.  The questions comes to a normal mind as why the Pentagon decided to arm its fleets with nukes when there was no other super power in the world which could challenge the USA…?

However, making the ‘Times Square Bomb’ as a strong plea and then issuing a serious warning by the top US diplomat, Ms Hillary Clinton on 8th May, 2010, in Washington, in an interview to CBS, saying “Washington had already conveyed this message to Islamabad, the consequences for Pakistan would be very serious if a terror attempt like the failed Time Square bombing were to succeed and was found to have originated in that country”, now it seems that the US administration, CIA and Pentagon have decided to take-on one country at a time and now first Pakistan as this is the only Muslim country which has nukes whereas Iran has yet to develop it as yet as she has also not officially announced, therefore, AIPAC must have given instructions to deal with Pakistan first and then with Iran, and afterward there will be no country in the world to challenge Israel, US or India. Therefore, in order to justify their pre-emptive nuclear strikes on Pakistan the Secretary of State, Ms Clinton and the Defense Secretary, Robert Gates have already announced in a joint press conference on 11thApril, 2010 as mentioned earlier.





Ms Clinton..!, refering to your warning to Pakistan, may we ask as what is the guarantee that CIA and Mossad will NOT make a false-flag conspiracy plan, proposed within the United States government in 1962..?  The plan called for CIA or other operatives to commit apparent acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Castro-led Cuba. One plan was to “develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington”. This operation is especially notable in that it included plans for hijackings and bombings followed by the use of phony evidence that would blame the terrorist acts on a foreign government, namely Cuba”.

Now let us analyze  what could be the circumstances that Faisal Shahzad had to go for such an attempt, knowing that despite being a US citizen his identity of Pakistani origin, may put not only him, but also his family in US and in Pakistan and his country of origin, Pakistan, may be put in tremendous difficulties and problems but still he did it and confessed to do it at once. Therefore, there could be only two possibilities which are;

  1. Being a Pashtun Faisal Shahzad would have been much frustrated of USA’s indiscriminate killing of Pashtuns under the garb of ‘war-on-terror’, through Drone attacks, the same race which used to be praised a lot by the same US when they were fighting, (or were being used), against USSR, then the presence of US troops in FATA, again under the disguise of “Army Trainers”, making fools of the Pakistani people, and also spreading waves of terror throughout NWFP through Blackwater. If it is so, then this is the high time for US to think that there is something wrong in her Af-Pak policy, as now there could be more Faisal Shahzads in future.
  2. The probability of Faisal Shahzad been bought by CIA and Mossad, in a ‘set-up’ by CIA and Mossad, can’t be overlooked. Why did Shahzad lie that he got training in North Waziristan whereas the militants based in North Waziristan have denied even to know of him or his name. Secondly, why the “Pakistani Taliban”  accept the responsibility ‘so soon’,  through a video tapped message, because the ‘bomb’ was detected at 6:30pm NYC time and it was 5.30am, the next day, in Pakistan and 5.00am in Afghanistan so how did the Pakistani Taliban  know about the ‘bomb’ in Times Square, New York..? And how could they announce acceptance of responsibility, prepare video cassette and send it to Washington so soon..?. The CIA and Mossad are known to be experts in preparing counterfeit video taped messages, films and even the passports of other countries as they have been preparing fake videos a lot of Osama Bin Laden, and Al-Zahveri. Moreover, the big question is that keeping in view the importance of Times Square which remains crowded by tourists from all over America and the world, at least 3-4 dozens policemen keep patrolling the area 24 hours a day then why did even one of the NYPD officer not notice the gun-smelling fumes coming out of a long-standing SUV, parked there, and the surveillance through security cameras also remained unable to detect the fuming SUV and a small vendor noticed and informed the police..? By the way where the entire NYPC police official had disappeared from that place and why..?

However, Shahzad did and said exactly what US/CIA and Mossad wanted, deliberately or in-deliberately, but they have achieved miles through it which is depicted clearly in Hillary Clinton’s warning to Pakistan. Now it is quite likely that these agencies may create another fake ‘Bomb Attack’ somewhere in New York, blaming again Pakistan as CIA can do it as it had proposed the same plan/tactics in “Operation Northwood” which was turned down by JFK. The details, of Operation Northwood, obtained from Journalist James Bamford, summarized Operation Northwoods in his April 24, 2001 book, Body of Secrets, as below.

Operation Northwoods

Operation Northwoods, or Northwoods, which was a false-flag conspiracy plan, proposed within the United States government in 1962. The plan called for CIA or other operatives to commit apparent acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Castro-led Cuba. One plan was to “develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington”. This operation is especially notable in that it included plans for hijackings and bombings followed by the use of phony evidence that would blame the terrorist acts on a foreign government, namely Cuba”.

President John F. Kennedy personally rejected the Northwoods proposal. A JCS/Pentagon document (Ed Lansdale memo) dated March 16, 1962 titled MEETING WITH THE PRESIDENT, 16 MARCH 1962 reads: “General Lemnitzer commented that the military had contingency plans for US intervention. Also it had plans for creating plausible pretexts to use force, with the pretext either attacks on US aircraft or a Cuban action in Latin America for which we could retaliate. The President said bluntly that we were not discussing the use of military force, that General Lemnitzer might find the U.S so engaged in Berlin or elsewhere that he couldn’t use the contemplated 4 divisions in Cuba.”[16] The proposal was sent for approval to the Secretary of Defense, Robert McNamara, but was not implemented. Kennedy removed Lemnitzer as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff shortly afterward, although he became Supreme Allied Commander of NATO in January 1963.

The continuing push against the Cuban government by internal elements of the U.S. military and intelligence community (the failed Bay of Pigs Invasion, the Cuban Project, etc.) prompted Kennedy to attempt to reign in burgeoning hard-line anti-Communist sentiment that were intent on proactive, aggressive action against communist movements around the globe. After the Bay of Pigs, Kennedy fired then CIA director Allen W. Dulles, Deputy Director Charles P. Cabell, and Deputy Director Richard Bissell, and turned his attention towards Vietnam.

Kennedy also took steps to bring discipline to the CIA’s Cold War and paramilitary operations by drafting a National Security Action Memorandum (NSAM) which called for the shift of Cold War operations to the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the U.S. Department of Defense as well as a major change in the role of the CIA to exclusively deal in intelligence gathering. Kennedy was notably unpopular with the military, a rift that came to a head during Kennedy’s disagreements with the military over the Cuban Missile Crisis, shortly before the presentation of Northwoods. Personally, Kennedy expressed concern and anger to many of his associates about the CIA’s growing influence on civilians and government inside America.

But it was something surprising that JFK was assassinated on Nov. 22, 1963, in Dallas, under conspicuous circumstances and the person who had been alleged to be his murderer, was also murdered by another person again under controversial circumstances, before he coughs out the ‘facts’ and the “truth” actually who was involved in JFK’s murder and why…? . Unquote

Didn’t 9/11 happen exactly the same way as CIA planned it in “Operation Northwoods but couldn’t be materialized….? It’s an accepted fact and 9/11 is a vital proof of it where, according to a Report, 150 Israelis had arrived in US just 2 months before the happening of 9/11 out of whom five Israelis were caught dancing nearby streets of WTC while the towers were burning. Why these five Israelis were dancing..? The logical answer is simple, to celebrate the accomplishment of their mission which was an important factor to be considered by the “9/11 Commission”.  The 9/11 Commission Rejects own Report as Based on Government Lies.

Therefore, the 9/11 was planned exactly in accordance with the Operation Northwood Plan and G.W Bush and Dick Cheney were completely taken-over by the Hawks of US administration and both of them were acting on whatever they were told by CIA high-ups. For example, full fledged attack by a Super Power, on a tiny country, Iraq, on the totally false baseless Report on WMDs, submitted by CIA about which Bush had confessed that it was fake, but the Hawks in CIA prevailed upon and got killed a few million Muslims in Iraq and occupied the second biggest source of oil in the world.

In John Farmer’s book: “The Ground Truth: The Story Behind America’s Defense on 9/11″, the author builds the inescapably convincing case that the official version… is almost entirely untrue…

In 2006, The Washington Post reported…”Suspicion of wrongdoing ran so deep that the 10-member commission, in a secret meeting at the end of its tenure in summer 2004, debated referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation, according to several commission sources. Staff members and some commissioners thought that e-mails and other evidence provided enough probable cause to believe that military and aviation officials violated the law by making false statements to Congress and to the commission…” Please link the following site for more details about the 9/11 Commission’s Report and criticism on it.

http://www.salem-news.com/articles/september112009/911_truth_9-11-09.php

After the disintegration of the USSR, USA was the only super power in the world so making the best use of it the Hawks of US administration, dominated by Jewish and Christian Zionists, decided to kill the ardent Muslim leaders and also to go for genocide of Muslims as they were afraid of them ever since Bhutto had convened Conference of Muslim Heads of the States at Lahore, in 1974, wherein Bhutto, late Shah Faisal and Col. Qaddafi, of Libya, have been talking of Muslim’s unity. Therefore, the Jews never wanted that the Muslims be united as well as may also develop nukes, so, they managed to get killed Shah Faisal of Saudi Arabia and Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto and bombed Col. Qaddafi’s palace to kill him as well.

Almost all the Presidents of USA, after the controversial deaths of JFK and Robert Kennedy, had been totally taken-over by Hawks, that’s why operation Desert Storm War was planned on totally false and baseless grounds, against Iraq whereas the basic objectives, of the Desert Storm war, were to sell the stockpiles of arms, produced in US war machines/factories as there was no further storage capacity, to the filthy rich Sheikhdoms of Persian Gulf and Saudi Arabia, and place US armed forces permanently in the M.E at the expenses of Gulf States and Saudi Arabia, by creating the fear of Saddam Hussein in the region, keeping Saddam Hussein alive for his ‘use’ in the future and so  he was again used by G.W Bush.

Jeff Gates has written in his book, ‘Guilt by Association’, “In a 2008 poll, 81% of Americans agreed that the U.S. is on the wrong track, up from 35% in early 2002. Just 4% agree the country is better off than it was five years ago.” Therefore, by creating incidents like “Christmas day crotch Bomber” and now the ‘Times Square Bomb’, are to confuse and mislead 81% Americans public who are of the opinion that the US is on the wrong track.

However, taking the lame excuses of ‘war-on-terror’ USA invaded another weak and a tiny country, Afghanistan, with the sole objective to denuclearize Pakistan as they know by themselves that 9/11 was never ‘born’ in Kandahar. They could not attack  Pakistan as are afraid of Pakistani nukes about which Pakistan has told a number of times that if pushed to the wall we shall have no alternative but to use nukes, on India, Israel and also on an enemy wherever it is.

This is an accepted fact that the US and allied forces are extremely coward as they have remained unable to go beyond 20% of Afghanistan despite possessing state-of-the-art weaponry as well as head-to-toe protective gadgets. And now observing the bravery of Pakistani armed forces they want to engage Pakistani army with them in combats with Taliban to keep them in the front line as they do of poor Afghan Govt. soldiers, in order to save US and allied troops from the onslaught of Taliban, the killing machines who fight with naked head and foot with only one meal a day. This is also a proof of extreme cowardice of US and allied forces, stationed in Afghanistan for the last 9 years.

USA’s ‘double-edged-sword’ strategy against Pakistan.

Theses agencies, on the assurance of India’s’ RAW that since Pakistan army has been ‘defeated’ in 1971 and in Kargil, therefore, now a mercenary force with state-of-the art ammunition, in collaboration with Indian army, would prevail upon Pakistan army and  take-over, if not Islamabad, then at least the nuclear sites and the nukes the Taliban, in collaboration with Indian army, would be able to make a breakthrough in laying hands on Pakistani nuclear sites and arsenals, CIA, Mossad and RAW trained in India

I have said in my almost all articles that USA is keeping a dagger in its ‘cloak’ of friendship with Pakistan. Therefore, CIA, in collaboration with Mossad and RAW, created TTP, trained them in India and supplied them state-of-the-art ammunition which even Pakistan’s army did not have, with the sole purpose and strategy to spread and create chaos and devastation in Pakistani cities in order to destabilize Pakistan. Then US administration and also US media, in both print and electronically, made alot of hue and cry that the nuclear arsenals of Pakistan are not safe e and may go into the hands of Taliban, as per ‘plan’.

Therefore, Washington issued statements, one after the other, in Sep, 2007, as appeared in a section of the press, “We know some of the places but not all so we have asked Pakistan military to hand-over these arsenals before Taliban’s access to these nuclear arsenals”. Washington further said, “We have also made arrangements to carry these nukes safely from Pakistan to Boston,  through our Delta and Orange forces deployed in Afghanistan, along with the borders of Pakistan, and may act on 12-24 hrs notice and are fully trained to handle transportation of nuclear arsenals.” So, on the one hand the US/CIA created TTP and then made hue and cry that the Taliban may take-over Pakistani nuclear arsenals, therefore, either Pakistan should handover these nuclear arsenals to US or USA will ask its Special Elite Forces, Delta and Orange forces enter into Pakistan and take-over all nuclear arsenals. Probably Washington was treating Pakistan like a child who had a time bomb in his hand which the child did not know how to use and the US wanted to take it.

However, this strategy miserably failed and the Pakistan army crushed the militants who were backed by CIA, Mossad and RAW and were creating devastation almost all over Pakistan. But the USA, Israel and India, don’t want to go empty handed from Afghanistan and now it seems that, after being disappointed from Pakistani Taliban’s failure to “complete the job”, now they have decided to attack  Pakistan, and so what if Pakistan may use nukes on India as the US and Israel are more concerned about themselves. India should learn from the mistakes of others, analyze USA’s friendships with other countries, in the past,  before deciding to go for a longer and broader friendship deals with the US.

The ‘friendship’ of USA, with Pakistan, could be proved as totally false because of just one simple logical reason that USA can never be sincere to Pakistan, a Muslim country possessing nuclear arsenals, and as well as to Pakistan’s enemies i.e. Israel and India, at the same time. Because the US can never be insincere to Israel otherwise AIPAC- American Israel Public Affairs Committee will turn the US administration upside down, and since USA has ‘just become married’ to India so the USA can’t ditch her so soon. In fact AIPAC is running the foreign affairs of the USA and no President, Senator or a Congressman, can go against the decisions of AIPAC. Therefore, Obama has to work very cautiously with the present Hawks in US administration.

USA, Israel and Britain don’t care even if Pakistan retaliates by attacking on Delhi and Mumbai with nuclear war-heads and even if 2-3 million people are killed on both sides because these countries want to get rid of Pakistan’s nuclear capability in any case, therefore, won’t care of world anger as what happened after US used nukes over Japan, killing app.600,000 Japanese in Hiroshima and Nagasaki, in 1945.  So what if 2-3 million people are killed in a nuclear war between India and Pakistan since the USA and Britain want to ensure security for Israel, from the nukes of a Muslim country, be it Pakistan first as Iran will be ‘taken care’ off later.

Author Details
Carol graduated from Riverside White Cross School of Nursing in Columbus, Ohio and received her diploma as a registered nurse. She attended Bowling Green State University where she received a Bachelor of Arts Degree in History and Literature. She attended the University of Toledo, College of Nursing, and received a Master’s of Nursing Science Degree as an Educator.

She has traveled extensively, is a photographer, and writes on medical issues. Carol has three children RJ, Katherine, and Stephen – two daughters-in-law; Suzy and Katie – two granddaughters; Isabella Marianna and Zoe Olivia – and one grandson, Alexander Paul. She also shares her life with husband Gordon Duff, many cats, two rescue pups, and two guinea pigs.
{p}Carol’s Latest Posts{/p}
ATTENTION READERS
Due to the nature of independent content, VT cannot guarantee content validity.
We ask you to Read Our Content Policy so a clear comprehension of VT's independent non-censored media is understood and given its proper place in the world of news, opinion and media.

All content is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are NOT necessarily the views of VT, other authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners or technicians. Some content may be satirical in nature. All images within are full responsibility of author and NOT VT.

About VT - Read Full Policy Notice - Comment Policy

Comments are closed.