Will the American ‘Final Option’ work?

Will the American ‘Final Option’ work?


By M. I. Bhat


Hitler took pride in his “Aryan race” that put Jews in disadvantage because changing race is beyond one’s means. So, he found an easy excuse to go for Final Solution to solve his Jewish problem once for all. Contrarily, America takes pride in its freedom and values that any one can adopt.

So the option: Adopt or perish. When communists proved problematic, America went all out against them and we had the actual wars and Cold War. Now it is Muslims who have turned out to be problematic. And America seems to have settled for ‘Final Option’ to settle its Muslim problem. In one short sentence, the ‘Final Option’ could be summed up thus:  Kill every Muslim you see standing.

Publically undeclared it may be though, this seems to be what America is working on if the recent history of American threats against and the trajectory of its one-after-another wars on the Muslim countries is any guide. The pro forma script is: First comes persistent volley of allegations and threats supported in full measure by mainstream media, followed by orchestrated howling by America and its “international community,” invitation to the table set with humiliating menu, sanctions, UN Security Council drama, more sanctions, and then the big bang bombing.

Though no body is keeping actual count, millions of Muslims have already been slaughtered and maimed and families ruined and displaced in a continuing process.

Sudan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya — trophies that already decorate White House; Syria and Iran are in pipeline.

Presidential hopeful Mitt Romney has marked a new game. He calls for “tougher action” against Egypt, which President Obama, as priming-up measure, ordered for dumps (neither ally nor enemy).

Will this option work one way only to the total victory of America or both ways as in the case of Germany?

To find the answer, America needs to drop its arrogance for a moment and try to contemplate what the trophies already won have brought it in bonus.

The toughest action that one can think of is what US took against Afghanistan and Iraq using everything it its diplomatic and military arsenal —  creating the largest ever international coalition of the willing and unwilling and using every type of big and small piece of military hardware in its inventory and even testing-live those still under development. Isn’t it?


Let us first consider war on Iraq. Although it began two years later than the one on Afghanistan, it exposed America, morally and military, very early. Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo are there for ever tagged with any American high moral preaching.  The “enduring” military bases that where supposed to signal American intentions of being in perpetual occupation of Iraq stand deserted. The fate of US Embassy in Bagdad – the largest in the world intended to announce and hallmark Pax Americana — is virtually a shelter house for the shunned (by Iraqis), defunct US diplomatic corpse and most likely some JSOC commandos (American President’s private militia, neither reporting nor accountable to either Secretary of Defense or Congress).

Winners? US bête nova – Iran and China!

But it is really Afghanistan that takes the cake in thoroughly and abundantly exposing not just American military might but also all of its Nato and non-Nato coalition partners’. The latest out from Afghanistan is the Taliban attack on Prince Harry’s base inflicting “unprecedented” damage and accelerated green-on-blue killings. This is just only days after ISAF Chief, the Four-Star General, Allen Jones put his head together with his 40 commanders in Afghanistan to avoid such attacks. Policy shift these brave and wise-heads announce: Carry weapon even in loo!

Did that help? No.

So the new strategy: No joint operations with Afghan soldiers!

Will this new strategy help? Your guess is as good as mine. For certainty you may read the unclassified Pentagon-commissioned report “A Crisis of Trust and Cultural Incompatibility” or its highlights-cum-commentary by Colonel Eugene Khrushchev here on VT, if you haven’t read it already.

Here is one more recent revealing piece – an 84 page draft  report titled “Dereliction of Duty II” by some unnamed US army personal who basis his report on what “I have personally observed or physically participated in programs for at least the last 15 years” and “What I witnessed in my most recently concluded 12 month.” It should shock any American irrespective of their political allegiances or position on America’s wars. The summary of the report reads:

“Senior ranking US military leaders have so distorted the truth when communicating with the US Congress and American people in regards to conditions on the ground in Afghanistan that the truth has become unrecognizable. This deception has damaged America’s credibility among both our allies and enemies, severely limiting our ability to reach a political solution to the war in Afghanistan.  It has likely cost American taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars Congress might not otherwise have appropriated had it known the truth, and our senior leaders’ behavior has almost certainly extended the duration of this war.  The single greatest penalty our Nation has suffered, however, has been that we have lost the blood, limbs and lives of tens of thousands of American Service Members with little to no gain to our country as a consequence of this deception.”

Insightful, like former CIA analyst Michael Scheuer who published ‘Imperial Hubris: Why the West is Losing the War on Terror’ in 2004, saw it coming very early in the war but were ignored.

Like I wrote earlier, how many Three and Four Star Generals have preceded General Jones and how many times they repeated “our resolve is fierce, and our commitment to this fight is total?” They are gone and lost in history along with their Joint Chiefs of Staff and their Defense Secretaries and their “fierce” resolve but the “rag-heads” are there making one after another coalition partner along with their Generals and killer toys leave Afghanistan in haste with coal — thick and dark — on their face. The latest to announce early departure is New Zealand while Britain has started working on excuses. Guardian quotes the British Defense Minister Phillip Hammond saying:

Six months ago the military was privately pushing “for keeping force levels as high as possible for as long as possible …. But … British military thinking was evolving because commanders had been “surprised by the extent to which they have been able to draw back and leave the Afghans to take the lion’s share of the combat role.”

English way of massaging and managing truth!

This takes the cake:

“We have to be clear why we came here in the first place. I believe very clearly that if we are going to ask British troops to put themselves in the firing line, we can only do that to protect UK vital national security interests….[We did] “not come here to defeat the insurgency”

So, whatever we heard for the past 11 years from British Prime Minister, Defense Minister, Foreign Minister and other sundry pro-war politicians about British soldiers being in Afghanistan to secure Britain and its national interests and lauding the British public for their sacrifices was all crap. Will some one ask Mr. Hammond what and who his soldiers have been fighting against for over a decade if not insurgency and insurgents? Afghan army? Well, stick for some time more, Mr. Hammond, you won’t be disappointed, after all, given the speed at which “green-on-blue” attacks are happening.

Anyway, it is precisely the same logic-of-convenience that helped US and UK re-dress once the most cherished Afghan “Mujahedeen” into now the most hated Al Qaeda and Taliban “terrorists!”

As an aside, watch out for Mr. Hammond’s contrived explanation for his British pregnant soldier giving birth to a baby on the Afghan war front.  Wow! Fighting Taliban and getting pregnant!

As for the coalition’s puppet master, America, I believe Tom Engelhardt has the best take:

“[T]he flight of those Kiwis should be thought of as a small omen, even if they are departing as decorously, quietly, and flightlessly as possible.  Because here’s the thing: once the November election is over, “expedited departure” could well become an American term and the U.S., as it slips ignominiously out of Afghanistan, could turn out to be the New Zealand of superpowers.”

New Zealand of superpowers – what a low adjective for the “superpower!”

That being the story on war fronts, what about the home front?

The stats streaming out non-stop about ever-mounting American Government (in fact for the whole Western world) and public debt, homeless, unemployed, hungry, people on food-stamps, social disharmony (crimes, drugs, suicides, protests) as well as the preparations by Homeland Security and other non-military Government agencies (importantly purchase and piling of deadly munitions) to control potential civil disorder  have become so common and widespread that it hardly needs any further analysis or comment. All it needs is simple defining — America is broke, and breaking like the past great empires.

More than anything, American is morally broke. Every word coming from its leaders is suspect in the eyes of ordinary people. Its elected leadership hates its own poor, so typically reflected in Mitt Romney’s comments on “half of Americans”: “[My] job is not to worry about those people. It has lost its body and soul to Zionists, again so unabashedly stated by Romney:

“I’d get on the phone to my friend Bibi Netanyahu and say, ‘Would it help if I said this? What would you like me to say and do?”

Not to be left behind, Obama assures his Jewish audience saying:

“So America’s commitment — America’s commitment and my commitment to Israel and Israel’s security is unshakable. It is unshakable.”

In the same breath he goes on to say:

“I am proud to say that no U.S. administration has done more in support of Israel’s security than ours. None. Don’t let anybody else tell you otherwise. It is a fact.”

That America is broke, however, doesn’t mean its military capability to destroy the world several times over has in anyway diminished. In fact its capability to do so is ever on the rise. It may not have won any of its major wars (Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan) but the addiction it has developed in turning other countries into rubble and destroy societies remains insatiable. And that is precisely the reason that has brought it — as a nation, as a society — to the pass where its people and world at large find it today. Where it should be exerting its attention, energy and resource, like, for instance, mending its economy and controlling drug use, it is asking others to work for its causes — “Do more”: e.g., Europe for economy, Mexico for drug control.

Wars may have hugely indebted American Government and destroyed lives of its 99% but it has equally hugely benefited its 1% and its ruler — Israel. So, why avoid future wars? The impression that America is being cornered by Israel into war on Iran is humbug for any one who knows that right from Bush’s war on Afghanistan and Iraq, military planning for the war on Iran has been continuously in the works in the Pentagon. No less an authority than General Wesley Clark, among numerous others, is on record to have openly confessed this.

American Christian Zionists and its war industry are brimming in their zeal for perpetual wars to need any outside prodding or cornering for a new war. It is congruence of their interests with those of Israel’s desire to see its regime expand that has made the two brothers-in arms in their political and military missions. After the Cold War, Muslim world, in particular the Middle East — where Israel has its major interests and with its financial, media and political wherewithal to influence American policies — provided a common ground to accomplish their own goals. There is no other apparent reason that could explain American per blind partisan approach to the ground facts and international opinion as, for instance, in the case of Israel’s brutal occupation of Palestine, war on Iraq or NTP-signatory Iran’s peaceful program vs NTP- non-signatory Israel’s illegitimate nuclear weapons.

Unless something cataclysmic holds America back, war on Iran is very much a fact accompli. The tiff between Netanyahu and Obama is only about timing – pre-election (Netanyahu) or post-election (Obama). There are gains to be made by American businesses, Christian Zionists and Israel that can not be sacrificed for the potential death and destruction of the Muslims or the losses to be suffered by the American 99%. Recall the historically unprecedented public protests or political and military advice against war on Iraq didn’t affect one bit US decision to attack and occupy Iraq on pure false and fabricated grounds.

And then we are told “Muslims hate our freedom!”

Way back in 2004, the very first conclusion of the study conducted by the American Defense Science Board Task Force is “Muslims do not “hate our freedom,” but rather, they hate our policies.” That is right. Muslims don’t hate American or Western freedoms. In fact, Muslims want freedom from their America-backed tyrants as protests from Tunisia to Bahrain and Saudi Arabia have amply demonstrated. Backing Pharaoh Mubarak, America wasted lives of thousands upon thousand of Egyptians for four decades. Yet Hillary Clinton is now calling them ungrateful!  A case of typical American values! France bans Muslims from protesting against insults to their Prophet but same time allows its Christian citizens to publish cartoons insulting their Prophet. What a fair play! Truly “exalted” Western values!

What Muslims hate, and hate to their over fill, is this Western hypocrisy and such hypocritical values. Any assumption on the part of America and its Western allies to be able to make Muslims conform to such values is simply a “cognitive oxymoron.” That is not because Muslim do not want to progress and enjoy fruits of democracy like the people in the Western world nor is it because of so-called “cultural incompatibility.” It is primarily and fundamentally because of the fundamental contradiction in the value system between the two. Jus one example, consider this: Ever, repeat ever, heard of any Muslim – liberal, progressive, fundamental, Salafi, Sufi, Shia, Suni or whatever you have – say a word of disrespect, let alone insult, any of the Prophets or symbols of any religion including of those who practice something absolutely unacceptable to Islam, like idolatry?  Instead, as a fundamental part of their faith, they believe not just in Moses and Jesus and their messages but all the prophets.

Given the existing state of affairs, it is naive to expect any change in American attitude and policies toward Muslims in the foreseeable future. Rather, the American attitude is going to harden further. Be sure, so would the Muslim resistance. Time will tell if the outcome of Final Option proves be any different for America than what Final Solution proved for Germany.

It's only fair to share...Share on FacebookShare on Google+Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on TumblrShare on RedditEmail this to someone

All content herein is owned by author exclusively. Expressed opinions are not necessarily the views of VT Archives, VT Archives authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians or Veterans Today Network and its assigns. In addition, all images within this post are the full responsibility of the author and NOT Veterans Today Network.
Legal Notice - Comment Policy

Posted by on September 20, 2012, With Reads Filed under Veterans. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

23 Responses to "Will the American ‘Final Option’ work?"

  1. this is too simple  September 24, 2012 at 3:50 pm

    Or until all the sociopathic, ego maniacal, double standard worshiping boomers finally retire into a nice nursing home and generation X wipes out everything they have done.

  2. Excalibur  September 24, 2012 at 5:58 am

    I believe that the aggressive tendency within islam that makes Muslims an easy target for the zionist propagandists needs to be reigned in by the Muslim authorities themselves. This also needs to start at grass roots level – where devotees of Islam have been led to believe that it is their duty to impose their will on others by violence and intimidation – exactly the same criticism leveled at the west in Islamic lands.


    Have a look at the above – which might shock many Americans. I would rather Christians and Muslims were in agreement to keep to their own lands and to fight the common enemy.

  3. Ann  September 22, 2012 at 6:23 pm

    Glad you’re on the job. Another good starter is JFK’s Secret Society Speech, available online and at the JFK website, and also the speech by the valiant Sen. Louis Thomas McFadden who was murdered for his loyalty. Even the fessing up by the idiot Woodrow Wilson who realized far too late that he was used to enslave us and said so, although most “teachers” still have no clue. He got caught with the floozie next door and blackmailed and thought that it was better to violate the Constitution and sell us all into slavery and drag us into war than anyone found out about l’affaire. Which we all found out about anyway.

    He’s another one who should be dug up and sprinkled over the town dump. I never could figure out what she saw in that jerk anyway. Not his looks, that’s for sure. Just the thought of him in some, any affair is just creepy. Maybe they paid her. Must have been a fortune. She was probably cringing and repeating to herself “houseboatcarhouseboatcarhouseboatcar” throughout. Or maybe she was just another skanky creep like him. Whatever.

  4. Curmudgeon  September 21, 2012 at 1:45 pm

    “So, he found an easy excuse to go for Final Solution to solve his Jewish problem once for all.”

    Sorry, Mr. Bhat if you believe the “Final Solution” was that the Jews perished, I have a bridge to sell you.

  5. Sami Jamil Jadallah  September 21, 2012 at 11:28 am

    Ricohands, of course you are right Pakistan has the nukes so what. In order for the Muslim and Arab world to rise up to the challenge and meet the 21 century it needs to develop its own infrastructure, schools, schools, and more schools at all level, it needs roads, dams, agriculture development, science and technology, it needs education and more educations… so what if Pakistan has the nukes? The Soviet Union fell apart and it has some 30,000 nukes and it did not help it from collapsing. The only two countries crazy enough to use nukes are Israel and the US since the decision makers in both countries are the same, Tel-Aviv rules Washington. And then what? Total destruction. If I was a decision maker I will not spend one penny on a nuclear weapons but will spend more and borrow to invest in education. It is the only thing that uplift people and countries.

  6. ricohands  September 21, 2012 at 10:20 am

    Exactly it used to be all about the Iron curtain in the Lame stream media. They had to focus on someone else after that fell.

  7. ricohands  September 21, 2012 at 10:18 am

    Pakistan already have the nuke.

  8. Dan  September 21, 2012 at 5:40 am

    Many good points. If a society is a reflection of its highest values, and if ours are the Enlightenment’s economic and vital values (health, fitness, sex), the fast-approaching and inevitable economic collapse entails the destruction of this society. The question is whether tribulation will bring about another, better society based on traditional moral values, or the Zios and their stooges are able to impose its antithesis; another oriental despotism and living hell, where the living may well wish they were dead, as happened in communist Russia.

  9. wiggins  September 21, 2012 at 5:29 am

    The British goverment could help this urgent problem by taking their collective heads out of their asses, but, of course they have as much influence as a Parish Council on their real masters the EU.

  10. Charlotte NC Bill  September 21, 2012 at 2:49 am

    Nations, organic nations, have the right to remain nations…from the latin “natal”..to be born into…Mass immigration is a crime of the elite against it’s own people…like the 1965 Immigration Act here..

  11. Tiu  September 20, 2012 at 10:13 pm

    In the 70’s NZ was a pretty even society, with no great gap between rich and poor and everyone was a Kiwi. Now you’re a Maori (and sub-dividing daily into sub-tribes), Pakeha, Polynesian, Asian or some other kind of immigrant or foreigner.
    The only thing people think about is their house prices as all the young people flee the country in search of meaningful work.
    Calling America the New Zealand of superpowers is very appropriate. Divide and ruin a once great place to live. Bro.

  12. Justin Kennedy  September 20, 2012 at 9:33 pm

    Wars are good for business and after the dissolution of the Soviet Union the U.S. was scrambling to find new enemies and boogie-men. The Arabs fit the bill perfectly. I don’t think being Muslim matters that much. They’re far away, are the Axis of Evil, non-Christians, have strange customs, can’t fight back and spout anti-U.S. rhetoric. In other words, a perfect place to bomb.

    I don’t think the U.S. wants Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan or wherever to conform…or do anything. There’s nothing they can do about it (other than seek out a hardened bunker). The U.S. doesn’t need any reasons to bomb, just that they want to…they need to.

  13. truthman  September 20, 2012 at 8:23 pm

    The most monumental lie ever told, in my opinion, is the lie of one Adolph Hitler. His contribution and dedication to the people of his beloved Germany has been so overly distorted in the history books that one can only wonder how much all other history has suffered the same consequences. Why? How? Ask the Zionists and their historians. The victors write the history books, or so I’ve been told. And if I am to believe that (and I do) then the Zionists are the victors. They were in WWI and WWII and every war that America has fought and lost or won in. What does that tell you about America? We are owned, at least, that is what it says to me. I would vote for Adolph Hitler (or Osama Bin Laden, or Ahmedenijahd, or Saddam Hussein, for that matter) over any US President since JFK. Not based on what the Zionist media writes about them, but what they say, how they say it, and what they DO! None of them follow the rules laid out by the Zionists and that…THAT is why they are destroyed either physically, or politically, through the Zionist controlled western media. So sad, and yet SO true. Peace.

  14. matthewmccauley  September 20, 2012 at 7:11 pm

    Gordon you really need to read London Times correspondent (circa 1940) Douglas Reed’s book, The Controversy of Zion. When you do, you will be unable to write an article detailing the Zionist design of mideast conflict while simultaneously referring to Germany’s “final solution”. Otherwise I find you a rare and very bright light, and truly thank you.

  15. DaveE  September 20, 2012 at 7:11 pm

    I think that “education system” you describe is called the Internet. Less easily corrupted by the zionists, hard as they may try. It may just defeat the bastards, yet.

    I have a couple degrees from rather prestigious schools in the US, all run by zionists. It ain’t worth PISS, if your teachers are pathological liars. If you are taught lies, you will repeat lies, as far as I’m concerned. I wish someone had told me that a long time ago.

  16. DaveE  September 20, 2012 at 7:01 pm

    Bingo, Ann. I’ve had good luck with the “Balfour Declaration” to get people turned onto the Jewish theft of Palestine, or “WTC Building 7” to get people aware of the Jewish false-flag operation known as 9/11, leading to the Jewish wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, etc. etc.

    Great strategy. All I can add is the word “repetition.” It WILL sink in, eventually, whether we’re alive at that point or not. The truth will win, if we tell it often enough.

  17. Sami Jamil Jadallah  September 20, 2012 at 7:01 pm

    I have to agree with Excalibur, so far Muslims proved to be their own worst enemies and of course with lots of help from the West mainly America, which with the orders from Israel is emerging as the leaders of the camp. Of course the mosques and the Madrasa and since the Afghan War against the Communist has emerged as the source of “ignorance” that has contributed to Muslims countries being at the end of development and advancement. The mosque with its mostly illiterate ignorant and demagogues view has so much influence specially in least developing countries such as Pakistan, Afghanistan, Somalia etc, and yes we must not forget the damaging influence mosques plays in countries such as Egypt, Jordan, Palestine, Tunisia, Morocco, Yemen among many. At one time the mosques were the center of learning not any more. What is needed is an enlightened religious and political leadership with more schools everywhere. Education and more education is the only way out of the misery and retardation Muslims live in. Malaysia and Turkey is but one good example of an enlightened religious and political leadership. Islam and Muslims need scholars, educators, scientists, sociologists, economists, engineers, doctors and nurses more than they need Imams and clergymen.

  18. DaveE  September 20, 2012 at 6:45 pm

    It could be that Jews have infil-traited and corrupted Muslim governments even more than Western ones, as preposterous as that sounds. The Wahhabis of Saudi Arabia and the Donmeh of Turkey, all Jews, have made it their business to persecute Muslims relentlessly. The modus operandi of the most evil crime syndicate, ever.

    In other words, perhaps the zionists are even more entrenched in Muslim countries than they are in the West.

    As bad as things are in the USA, I think you in Britain have it even worse with regard to the Jewish Mafia. (I lived in England as a lad for 3 years…… I love the place and miss it dearly, to be honest.) But to be honest, with myself and everyone else, I think we Yanks, known for our “take no prisoners” attitude, are onto the zionists even more so than our “don’t make a fuss” compatriots in England.

    Anyway, if I were a Muslim, I would sure as Hell want to get out, but the question is “why.” My personal opinion is that as bad as the Jews have made life here (in the US), they’ve been even more successful elsewhere in promoting and disguising their evil filth.

  19. Allesandro  September 20, 2012 at 6:24 pm

    Another example. In the US anyone wanting to protest a DNC or RNC Convention is corralled and fenced off from the activities, even at a G-8 or G-20 Summit. All this talk of free speech, we need to allow people to speak against the Prophet Muhammad, meanwhile on a day to day basis our freedoms under the US Constitution are denied without a second thought,… like under the Patriot Act, NDAA, the Military Commissions Act etc.

    What a hypocritical bunch of BULLSHIT. The instigators of the film against Muslims may have cost us all in terms of trust, good will, and fair play, as well as general respect for another culture and their beliefs. We need to seek out and punish those involved, to discourage a repeat performance, and apologize for the insulting, unnecessary film. ASAP. The importance of our relationship with all Muslims is far more important than letting them publish a film whose only purpose was to incite hostility.

  20. steve393  September 20, 2012 at 4:59 pm

    what’s “low adjective” about being called the New Zealand of superpowers, bro?
    New Zealand does not have a dirty filthy human rights abuses record like many other countries i could name, but won’t. We are polite, we kiwis.
    Check out a document called “The Opal Files”. It describes how one of your Rockefellers invaded Australia and NZ starting in the 70s, using the weapons of debt, assassination and corruption. Check out Soros’ alleged connection with the Port Arthur massacre.
    Over my lifetime i have watched both your beautiful country, and mine, turned into basket cases. By whom? Not us, bro.

  21. Ann  September 20, 2012 at 3:41 pm

    We have been lied to, conditioned, and continually fed reinforced brainwashing from our earliest ages in school, confirmed with memorization of the lies to pass tests, instructed by so-called scholars who memorize and debate permitted information, and by our leaders who willingly or unknowingly legislate laws and policies to keep the lies in place. And anyone who genuinely questions the script is ridiculed at best and professionally punished at worst.

    At some point we have to accept that this is the structure of deceit and if we are called names just call one back. As you can imagine I do so without hesitation and you know what? They get disoriented and shut up. They are simply not programmed to manage someone who calls them out and is not afraid of stupid schoolyard names and throws them right back. This creates the first crack in a wall of lies but there are some of our friends and neighbors who cannot face the truth for it is too terrible. No matter, they will find out soon enough whether they like it or not.

    Try it someday when talking to a stranger at the park, store, etc., and tell them something to look up. Just suggest one thing–you don’t want to overload them. Don’t get emotional, shout, or start backing up, just pick one topic that is easy to look up which exposes a lie. The listener can decide to hide from the awful truth or face it head on.

  22. Mike Kay  September 20, 2012 at 2:37 pm

    I may be the only person to say this, but I am really getting tired of the pop culture version of Hitler and Nazis spread around like cheap butter everywhere.
    If people want to understand the phenomenon of Hitler, and the Nazis, the information is available, information which is obviously rarely perused. Sure, swastikas were and are ancient symbols of motion and direction, but show a swastika today, and every drooling idiot on the planet shrieks “HITLER!”
    I might have read this article, but I have too much to do to wade through more pop culture nonsense.

  23. Excalibur  September 20, 2012 at 2:26 pm

    You do not need to be a genius to work out who is behind the programme to whip up hatred against Muslims. This is of course the jewish lobby, israeli agents and all their hidden operatives in the machinery of western government and media. They want young Christian and western men to fight and die attacking Islamic lands on their behalf. It is an old story and one which is repeated by zionists throughout history against one group or another. It is what they do.

    With few exceptions – like Sami and some on this VT site – Muslims do not do themselves many favours, however.

    There is an aspect of Muslim behaviour which I find hard to understand. That is the fact that currently they are streaming into the west in their hundreds of thousands and millions each year. They criticise the west both before and after they arrive here – and yet would still prefer to live here than in an Islamic country it would seem. Muslims in Britain arrive, refuse to integrate, refuse to learn the English language, create ghettos, demand their various benefits – and then talk down to their new hosts and tell us that we are inferior and doomed to death or slavery shortly under their world wide Caliphate.

    ‘How to win friends and influence people’ – it is NOT!

    The early ‘asylum seekers’ seemed to be running away from a way of life that was oppressive and horrible. They came to Britain and the west for refuge. Now they seem to be re-creating the very same conditions that they originally fled from. This is irrational. Recently it emerged that Muslim gangs and taxi drivers have been running sex slaves among extremely young local white British girls across the whole country – many as young as twelve. Thousands may be involved and the government is desperately trying to cover this up to prevent a backlash.

    Certainly the arrogant and downright hateful attitude of ‘British’ Muslims to their hosts leaves much to be desired – and of course makes it easy for our common enemy to point the finger. I would be interested to hear any suggestions that you might have to address this urgent problem.

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

From Veterans Today Network